Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2014 May 22;2(3):e00442-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00442-14

Draft Genome Sequences of Marinobacter similis A3d10T and Marinobacter salarius R9SW1T

Elena P Ivanova a,, Hooi Jun Ng a, Hayden K Webb a, Gao Feng b, Kenshiro Oshima c, Masahira Hattori c, Moriya Ohkuma d, Alexander F Sergeev e, Valery V Mikhailov f, Russell J Crawford a, Tomoo Sawabe b
PMCID: PMC4031335  PMID: 24855296

Abstract

Here, we present the draft genomes of Marinobacter similis A3d10T, a potential plastic biodegrader, and Marinobacter salarius R9SW1T, isolated from radioactive waters. This genomic information will contribute information on the genetic basis of the metabolic pathways for the degradation of both plastic and radionuclides.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Gram-negative, aerobic, moderately halophilic gammaproteobacteria with the ability to utilize hydrocarbons as the sole carbon and energy sources were incorporated into the genus Marinobacter more than 20 years ago (1). To date, the genus is composed of 33 validly described species (2), with another one yet to be validated (3). Currently, there are seven Marinobacter strains that have been reported to have their full genomes sequenced (410). Strain A3d10T was isolated from an enrichment experiment selecting for strains that can degrade polyethylene terephthalate (PET) from seawater collected from the first meter below the water surface from St. Kilda Beach, Port Philip Bay, Victoria, Australia (11), while strain R9SW1T was isolated from seawater collected from a radioactive contaminated area in Chazhma Bay, Gulf of Peter the Great, Sea of Japan, Pacific Ocean, Russia (12). In a recent study to screen for potentially PET-degrading marine bacteria, strain A3d10T was found to be able to hydrolyze bis(benzoyloxyethyl) terephthalate (3PET), a PET model substrate (13), whereas strain R9SW1T is of interest for its potential biodegradation of the radionuclides (12). The analyses of the genomes of these two novel Marinobacter species will stimulate further research on the metabolite activity, organic pollutant degradation, physiological and ecological functions, and evolution of the bacteria of the genus Marinobacter.

On the basis of taxonomic polyphasic analysis, strains A3d10T and R9SW1T are considered to represent novel species of the genus Marinobacter, for which the names Marinobacter similis A3d10T (type strain A3d10T = JCM 19398T) and Marinobacter salarius R9SW1T (type strain R9SW1T = JCM 19399T = LMG 27497T) are proposed (H. J. Ng, H. K. Webb, D. Gomez, T. Sawabe, J. Ryan, M. Vyssotski, C. Bizet, F. Malherbe, V. V. Mikhailov, R. J. Crawford, E. P. Ivanova, submitted for publication). The genomes of strains A3d10T and R9SW1T were sequenced using an Ion PGM system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and de novo assembled using the Newbler version 2.8 software. The resulting sequence data for each genome were then submitted to the Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MiGAP) (http://www.migap.org/index.php/en/) (14) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) for autoannotation. The open reading frames (ORFs), rRNAs, and tRNAs were also predicted using the MetaGeneAnnotator (MGA) (15), RNAmmer (16), and tRNAscan-SE (17), respectively. The size of the draft genome of strain A3d10T was found to be 3,975,896 bp, composed of 29 contigs, and it has a G+C content of 57.6%. The redundancy is 32, and the N50 contig length is 386,710 bp. Strain A3d10T contains 3,806 predicted genes, 2,692 putative coding sequences (CDS), 3 rRNAs, and 46 tRNAs. The size of the draft genome of strain R9SW1T was found to be 4,616,532 bp, composed of 99 contigs, and it has a G+C content of 57.1%. The redundancy is 27, and the N50 contig length is 152,316 bp. Strain R9SW1T contains 4,462 predicted genes, 3,168 CDS, 3 rRNAs, and 44 tRNAs.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The genome data have been deposited at GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ under the accession no. CP007151 and CP007152 for M. similis A3d10T and M. salarius R9SW1T, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by Genome Information Upgrading Program of National BioResource Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.

Footnotes

Citation Ivanova EP, Ng HJ, Webb HK, Feng G, Oshima K, Hattori M, Ohkuma M, Sergeev AF, Mikhailov VV, Crawford RJ, Sawabe T. 2014. Draft genome sequences of Marinobacter similis A3d10T and Marinobacter salarius R9SW1T. Genome Announc. 2(3):e00442-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00442-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Gauthier MJ, Lafay B, Christen R, Fernandez L, Acquaviva M, Bonin P, Bertrand JC. 1992. Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new, extremely halotolerant, hydrocarbon-degrading marine bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:568–576. 10.1099/00207713-42-4-568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Euzéby JP. 1997. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:590–592. 10.1099/00207713-47-2-590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gao W, Cui Z, Li Q, Xu G, Jia X, Zheng L. 2013. Marinobacter nanhaiticus sp. nov., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from the sediment of the South China Sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103:485–491. 10.1007/s10482-012-9830-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gärdes A, Kaeppel E, Shehzad A, Seebah S, Teeling H, Yarza P, Glöckner FO, Grossart HP, Ullrich MS. 2010. Complete genome sequence of Marinobacter adhaerens type strain (HP15), a diatom-interacting marine microorganism. Stand. Genomic. Sci. 3:97–107. 10.4056/sigs.922139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Grimaud R, Ghiglione JF, Cagnon C, Lauga B, Vaysse PJ, Rodriguez-Blanco A, Mangenot S, Cruveiller S, Barbe V, Duran R, Wu LF, Talla E, Bonin P, Michotey V. 2012. Genome sequence of the marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus SP17, which forms biofilms on hydrophobic organic compounds. J. Bacteriol. 194:3539–3540. 10.1128/JB.00500-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wang H, Li H, Shao Z, Liao S, Johnstone L, Rensing C, Wang G. 2012. Genome sequence of deep-sea manganese-oxidizing bacterium Marinobacter manganoxydans MnI7-9. J. Bacteriol. 194:899–900. 10.1128/JB.06551-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cui Z, Gao W, Li Q, Xu G, Zheng L. 2013. Genome sequence of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium strain Marinobacter nanhaiticus D15-8WT. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00301-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00301-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Handley KM, Upton M, Beatson SA, Héry M, Lloyd JR. 2013. Genome sequence of hydrothermal arsenic-respiring bacterium Marinobacter santoriniensis NKSG1T. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00231-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00231-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Papke RT, de la Haba RR, Infante-Domínguez C, Pérez D, Sánchez-Porro C, Lapierre P, Ventosa A. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the moderately halophilic bacterium Marinobacter lipolyticus strain SM19. Genome Announc. 1(4):e00379-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00379-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Song L, Ren L, Li X, Yu D, Yu Y, Wang X, Liu G. 2013. Complete genome sequence of Marinobacter sp. BSs20148. Genome Announc. 1(3):e00236-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00236-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Webb HK, Crawford RJ, Sawabe T, Ivanova EP. 2009. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) polymer surfaces as a substrate for bacterial attachment and biofilm formation. Microbes Environ. 24:39–42. 10.1264/jsme2.ME08538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ivanova EP, Gorshkova NM, Mikhailov VV, Sergeev AF, Gladkikh RV, Goryachev VA, Dudarev OV, Botsul AI, Mozherovsky AV, Slinko EN, Kiselev VI. 2005. Distribution of saprophytic bacteria in the atomic submarine accident zone in Chazhma Bay, Sea of Japan. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 31:65–72. 10.1007/s11179-005-0046-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Heumann S, Eberl A, Pobeheim H, Liebminger S, Fischer-Colbrie G, Almansa E, Cavaco-Paulo A, Gübitz GM. 2006. New model substrates for enzymes hydrolysing polyethyleneterephthalate and polyamide fibres. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 69:89–99. 10.1016/j.jbbm.2006.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sugawara H, Ohyama A, Mori H, Kurokawa K. 2009. Microbial genome annotation pipeline (MiGAP) for diverse users, abstr S-001, p 1–2 Abstr. 20th Int. Conf. Genome Informatics, Kanagawa, Japan [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res. 15:387–396. 10.1093/dnares/dsn027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108. 10.1093/nar/gkm160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964. 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES