Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease
. 2014 Apr;4(2):150–153. doi: 10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60332-7

Clinical human brucellosis in Malaysia: a case report

Tyagita Hartady 1, Mohd Zamri Saad 1,*, Siti Khairani Bejo 2, Mohd Shahrom Salisi 3
Reviewed by: Roberto Sousa Dias MSc4
PMCID: PMC4032053

Abstract

Clinical human brucellosis is quite rare in Malaysia although seroconverters are relatively more. This report describes a case of clinical human brucellosis in Malaysia. This case involved a 29-year-old research assistant in a veterinary microbiology laboratory. She complained of intermittent fever, anorexia, profuse sweating, malaise, headache, normotensive (110/60 mm Hg), muscle pain, and arthralgia for 3 d. Blood tests against dengue and malaria were negative thus she was prescribed vitamin C, paracetamol and cough syrup for common flu. The complaints, however, persisted on and off for the next 1 month. She eventually developed anemia and hypotension (90/50 mm Hg) and started to show reduced body weight. Abdominal palpations revealed hepatomegaly and splenomegaly with pain. Thus, brucellosis was suspected before the Rose-Bengal plate test was performed, which revealed the presence of high level of antibody against Brucella. The same test was repeated after 14 d and the results confirmed the presence of high antibody level against Brucella. Following serum agglutination test, a diagnosis of brucellosis was made and she was eventually prescribed rifampicine p.o. once a day combined with doxycycline p.o. twice a day for 6 consecutive weeks before she made a full recovery.

Keywords: Brucellosis, Human, Malaysia

1. Introduction

Brucellosis is a multisystem disease with a broad spectrum of non-specific symptoms that generally occur within 2 weeks but sometimes up to 3 months after inoculation. In human, it developed as a result of consuming unpasteurized, contaminated goat's milk or soft cheese that had been infected with Brucella melitensis (B. melitensis)[1]. This Gram-negative, aerobic non spore forming coccobacillus is a free-living, soil-dwelling organism that usually infects goats and sheep. In infected hosts, the bacterium appears as intracellular localization, particularly within the reticuloendothelial system[2]. There are six species of Brucella and four of which are known to infect humans. They are B. melitensis, Brucella abortus (B. abortus), Brucella suis (B. suis) and Brucella canis (B. canis). B. abortus is found principally in cattle, B. melitensis in goats and sheep, B. suis in swine and B. canis in kennel-raised dogs[3].

Both human and animal brucellosis are still endemic in some parts of the world such as Pakistan[4], India[5], China[6] and Sri Lanka[7]. About 500 000 new brucellosis cases were reported annually from all over the world[8]. In Malaysia, Brucella among animals was first isolated in 1950 and the government embarked upon an eradication program for brucellosis (National Surveillance Program for Animal Brucellosis) in cattle, buffaloes, goats and sheep since 1978[9]. Brucellosis in human was first reported in 2010 involving a seven-year boy after consumed a raw milk of an infected goat. Nevertheless, studies have shown seropositive humans in Malaysia, mainly among veterinarians and farmers associated with occupational exposure to animals. The seroprevalent was mainly males (90%) within the age range between 20 and 45 years old[10]. This paper reports a case of human brucellosis involving a laboratory assistant in Malaysia.

2. Case report

A 29-year-old woman who worked as a research assistant in a veterinary microbiology laboratory complained of intermittent fever, anorexia, profuse sweating, malaise, headache, normotensive (110/60 mm Hg) and muscle pain especially of the neck and shoulder, and arthralgia for 3 d. She was one of the 9 laboratory workers who were involved in a research on isolation of B. melitensis from goats for the past 3 months. The next day, she was admitted to a clinic for blood tests against dengue and malaria but was found negative. Therefore, a common flu was suspected and she was prescribed vitamin C, paracetamol and cough syrup.

The complaints, however, persisted on and off for the next one month and the conditions were getting worse. Anemia and hypotension (90/50 mm Hg) were eventually developed and she started to show reduced body weight from 50 kg to 43 kg. Abdominal palpations revealed hepatomegaly and splenomegaly with pain. The hemoglobin, hematocrit and neutrophil were low while the lymphocytes and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were high during the first month of infection. Following treatment (Tables 1 and 2), the conditions improved slightly.

Table 1. The haemogram results of the patient during Brucella infection.

Date RBC CMM×103 Hb g/L PCV L/L MCV fL MCHC % WBC CMM×103 B. NEUT % S. NEUT % LYMP % MONO % EOS % BAS ×1012/L THROM ×1012/L PP g/L II Unit ESR MM/HR
21-01-2013 - 12.7 40.2 - - 5.51 - 58 32 8.0 1.0 1 184 - - -
29-01-2013 3.93 10.9 33.6 85.4 32.6 4.88 - 51 37 10.0 1.0 1 222 - - 64
01-02-2013 4.04 11.4 35.0 87.0 32.6 4.63 0.14 22 18 3.7 1.0 0 260 90 2 -
04-02-2013 - 11.2 34.4 - - 3.80 - - - - - - 310 - - -
03-04-2013 3.98 11.2 34.0 85.0 32.9 4.18 0.04 23 14 2.1 1.0 0 189 74 2 -
16-04-2013 4.42 12.5 37.8 85.5 33.0 4.79 - 50 39 7.0 3.0 1 252 - - 34
02-01-2013 4.41 12.3 38.1 - - 4.62 - 42 47 - - - 232 - - -

RBC: Red blood cell count, Hb: Haemoglobin B, PCV: Packed-cell volume, MCV: Mean corpuscular volume, MCHC: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, WBC: White blood cell count, NEUT: Neutrophil, LYMP: Absolute lymphocyte count, MONO: Monocytes, EOS: Eosinophil, BAS: Basophils, THROM: Thrombocytes, ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Table 2. The blood biochemistry results of the patient during Brucella infection.

Date TP g/L AST U/L ALT U/L Urea mmol/L Creatinine umol/L Tbil umol/L Albumin g/L Sodium mmol/L Potassium mmol/L Chloride mmol/L
29-01-2013 62.9 33.0 26.0 2.43 76 8.0 38.2 133.0 3.5 102.0
03-04-2013 66.5 17.9 9.9 4.30 79 3.8 42.4 138.6 5.0 103.4
16-04-2013 - 21.0 14.0 3.53 65 - - - - -

TP: Total protein, AST: Aspartate transaminase, ALT: Alanine aminotransferase, Tbil: Total bilirubin.

At this moment, either brucellosis or leptospirosis was suspected based on the symptoms and history of her previous handlings of both organisms. Therefore, the Rose-Bengal plate test (RBPT)[11] was performed using antigen of B. melitensis, which revealed the presence of high level of antibody. The same test was repeated after 14 d and the results confirmed the presence of high antibody level against B. melitensis (Table 3). Eventually, standard agglutination test was performed[12], which revealed the presence of high level of antibody titer against Brucella (1:40). The same tests were repeated after 14 d and the results confirmed the presence of high antibody level against Brucella (Table 3).

Table 3. Results of Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) prior to, during and post-treatment periods.

Date Results Description
31 January 2013 (Pre-treatment) +++ Agglutination<3 seconds
4 April 2013 (During treatment) ++ Agglutination<15 seconds
16 June 2013 (Post-treatment) + Agglutination<30 seconds

Based on the serological tests and PCR, a diagnosis of brucellosis was made. She was eventually prescribed rifampicine p.o. once a day combined with doxycycline p.o. twice a day for 6 consecutive weeks.

3. Discussion

Brucellosis, particularly those caused by B. melitensis is among the most frequently reported laboratory-acquired infections. About 30% to 100% of cases of brucellosis in humans were obtained from laboratory exposures[13]. In this case, the patient was a microbiology laboratory worker, thus highly at risk of getting brucellosis through unpredicted exposure to cultures from clinical specimens. Transmission was believed to occur mainly via inhalation[14]. Nevertheless, human brucellosis appears to be quite rare in Malaysia, making the suspicion level among clinicians to be quite low.

RBPT has been proven as a cheap, rapid and effective serologic test compared to other serological tests, such as serum agglutination test, coomb test, compliment fixation test, indirect immunofluorescent antibody test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). With the minimum of equipment, RBPT can be performed and the results can be read by the naked eye. However, the specificity and sensitivity are unclear but the results are reliable[15]. In our study, serum agglutination test was also performed as second serology test to support the diagnosis. serum agglutination test had been recognised as the most commonly used test that is able to detect antibodies against B. abortus, B. suis and B. melitensis but not B. canis[12],[16].

This patient showed many of the acute symptoms of human brucellosis, which included undulating fever, myalgia and other clinical manifestations such as splenomegaly, hepatomegaly and spondylitis[17]. Infective endocarditis, although rare, is the most devastating complication from systemic brucellosis and could require surgical intervention. Splenic, hepatic and pulmonary abscesses can also develop. Lymphadenopathy is found in 10% to 20% of cases and splenomegaly or hepatomegaly in 20% to 30% of cases[18]. Other rare conditions include deep vein thrombosis, eukocytoclastic vasculitis, meningitis and nephritis. Ocular manifestations include optic neuritis, papilledema and uveitis[19]. Common hematologic findings include leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia[20].

The standard treatment for human brucellosis is doxycycline 100 mg p.o. twice a day and rifampcine 450 mg/day p.o. for 6 weeks[21]. However, the standard treatments vary depending on the patient's age and pregnancy status[22]. There was no statistical difference regarding the type of combination therapy on the early clinical response of human brucellosis. Nevertheless, the recommended treatments are as follows. For children younger than 8 years, a combination therapy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and aminoglycoside[23] or a combination of rifampicin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 45 d is needed[24]. For those aged 8 years and older, a combination of doxycycline and rifampin or a rifampicin and gentamicin combination could be prescribed[25]. Rifampicin combined with ciprofloxacin for 30 d has also been shown to be effective and offers the advantage of a shorter-treatment duration[26].

Guideline from the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on management of laboratory exposures to Brucella spp. advises serological follow-up and antibiotic prophylaxis. The rationale for serological follow-up is to identify and treat asymptomatic infected patients, although the benefit is not proven. In one exposure incident, treating seroconverted asymptomatic workers led to milder symptoms compared with those treated for clinically apparent disease[18]. Prolonged follow-up of exposed workers is required, since the incubation period varies from 1 week to 5 months. Similarly, the benefit of early prophylaxis to the highest risk group was not confirmed since no seroconversion was produced in the high-risk staffs tested[27].

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by a Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [07-03-11-1026FR] of the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.

Comments

Background

Brucella infections are rare in humans, despite being present in many animals used for consumption. The infection cases reported in humans is essential so that we can discuss investment in the management of infected animals, research laboratories safety and public health.

Research frontiers

This paper is a case report of human infection by B. melitensis, which is already known to be capable of infecting humans.

Related reports

In this work the authors use Rose-Bengal plate test (RBPT) to finalize the diagnosis of brucellosis. After reviewing the clinical and symptomatic aspects, the diagnosis is finalized by the intersection of clinical data with the Rose-Bengal plate test.

Innovations & breakthroughs

Brucellosis is a major zoonosis and in this work the authors demonstrated the use of rapid tests to screen for possible infections. The addition of clinical information with serological data acquired by the Rose-Bengal plate test confirms the Brucella infection in humans.

Applications

The use of serological tests, as Rose-Bengal plate test, to screen positive cases of Brucella makes the procedure faster and cheaper, allowing greater agility in identifying and initiating treatment.

Peer review

This is an interesting work, where the authors report on human infection by B. melitensis which is helpful for clinical diaganosis and treatment.

Footnotes

Foundation Project: Supported by a Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [07-03-11-1026FR] of the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.

Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Ramin B, MacPherson P. Human brucellosis. BMJ. 2013;341:c4545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shaqinah N, Mazlina M, Zamri-Saad M, Hazilawati H, Jasni S. In vitro penetration and survival of Brucella melitensis in lymphocytic cells of goats. Online J Vet Res. 2012;16(3):104–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kang SI, Her M, Kim JW, Kim JY, Ko KY, Ha YM, et al. Advanced multiplex PCR assay for differentiation of Brucella species. Appl Environ Microbial. 2011;77(18):6726–6728. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00581-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akhtar R, Chaudhry PZI, Shakoori PAR, Ahmad MUD, Aslam A. Comparative efficacy of conventional diagnostic methods and evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Vet World. 2010;3:53–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghodasara SN, Roy A, Bhanderi BB. Comparison of Rose Bengal Plate Agglutination, Standard tube agglutination and Indirect ELISA tests for detection of Brucella antibodies in cows and buffaloes. Vet World. 2010;3:61–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang Z, Yu S, Wang X, Dong S, Xu J, Wang J, et al. Human brucellosis in the People's Republic of China during 2005-2010. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(5):e289–e292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Priyantha MAR. Identification of biovars of Brucella abortus in aborted cattle and buffaloes herd in Sri Lanka. Vet World. 2011;4:542–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Schelling E, Zinsstag J. Global burden of human brucellosis: A systematic review of disease frequency. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(10):e1865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bamaiyi PH, Abd-Razak NS, Zainal MA. Seroprevalence and economic impact of eradicating zoonotic brucellosis in Malaysia: A case study of Melaka state of Malaysia. Vet World. 2012;5(7):398–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jama'ayah MZ, Heu JY, Norazah A. Seroprevalance of brucellosis among suspected cases in Malaysia. Malaysian J Pathol. 2011;33(1):31–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Swai ES, Schoonman L. The use of Rese Bengal plate test to assess cattle exposure to Brucella infection in traditional and smallholder dairy production system of Tanga Region of Tanzania. Vet Med Int. 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Lousiana Office of Public Health . Infectious disease epidemiology program. Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals; [Online] Available from: www.infectiousdisease.dhh.louisiana.gov. [Accessed on 21 September 2013] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Traxler RM, Lehman MN, Bosserman EA, Guerra MA, Smith TL. A literature review of laboratory-acquired brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(9):3055–3062. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00135-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sophie R, Michael L, Marcel B, Earl R. Prevention of laboratory acquired brucellosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:e119–e122. doi: 10.1086/421024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shahaza O, Khairani-Bejo S, Zunita Z, Bahaman AR. In-house Rose Bengal Plate Agglutination Test (RBPT) for a rapid diagnosis of brucellosis in goats in Malaysia. Int J Trop Med. 2009;4(3):116–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.WHO . Brucellosis in humans and animals: WHO guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Hattendorf J, Schelling E, Zinsstag J. Clinical manifestations of human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(12):e1929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Corbel MJ. Brucellosis in humans and animals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. [Online] Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/Brucellosis.pdf. [Accessed on 3 June 2013] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rolando I, Olarte L, Vilchez G, Lluncor M, Otero L, Paris M, et al. Ocular manifestations associated with brucellosis: a 26-year experience in Peru. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(9):1338–1345. doi: 10.1086/529442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sari I, Altuntas F, Hacioglu S, Kocyigit I, Sevinc A, Sacar S, et al. A multicenter retrospective study defining the clinical and hematological manifestations of brucellosis and pancytopenia in a large series: Hematological malignancies, the unusual cause of pancytopenia in patients with brucellosis. Am J Hematol. 2008;83:334–339. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Skalsky K, Yahav D, Bishara J, Pitlik S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Treatment of human brucellosis: systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2008;336:701–708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39497.500903.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Figueroa Damian R, Rojas Rodriguez L, Marcano Tochon ES. [Brucellosis in pregnancy: course and perinatal results] Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1995;63:190–195. Spanish. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lubani MM, Dudin KI, Sharda DC. A multicenter therapeutic study of 1100 children with brucellosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8:75–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Solera J, Martinez-Alfaro E, Espinosa A. Recognition and optimum treatment of brucellosis. Drugs. 1997;53:245–256. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753020-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Brucellosis, WHO . FAO/WHO Expert Committee on brucellosis: sixth report; 1985 Nov 12-19 November 1985; Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Agalar C, Usubutun S, Turkyilmaz R. Ciprofloxacin and rifampicin versus doxycycline and rifampicin in the treatment of brucellosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:535–538. doi: 10.1007/s100960050344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mendoza-Núñez M, Mulder M, Franco MP, Maas KS, Castañeda ML, Bonifacio N, et al. Brucellosis in household members of Brucella patients residing in a large urban setting in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:595–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease are provided here courtesy of China Humanity Technology Publishing House

RESOURCES