Abstract
The unfolded protein response (UPR) is fundamental for development and adaption in eukaryotic cells. Arabidopsis has become one of the best model systems to uncover conserved mechanisms of the UPR in multicellular eukaryotes as well as organism-specific regulation of the UPR in plants. Monitoring the UPR in planta is an elemental approach to identifying regulatory components and to revealing molecular mechanisms of the plant UPR. In this chapter, we provide protocols for the induction and analyses of plant UPR at a molecular level in Arabidopsis. Three kinds of ER stress treatment methods and quantitation of the plant UPR activation are described here.
Keywords: Unfolded protein response, UPR, Endoplasmic reticulum stress, Tunicamycin, Protein folding, Arabidopsis
1 Introduction
The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a collection of signaling pathways aiming to maintain endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein folding homeostasis in eukaryotic cells [1, 2]. There is approximately one-third of total protein folded and modified in the ER. Environmental or physiological factors that cause an imbalance between demand and capability of ER protein folding lead to ER stress. To relieve the ER stress, increase in the ER protein folding ability is one of the most instant and central regulation in the UPR. Diverse stimuli from exogenous or endogenous signals trigger the activation of the UPR. To experimentally examine the UPR, chemicals disturbing the ER protein folding homeostasis are applied to induce the UPR. One of the most frequently used UPR inducers is a glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin (Tm). The majority of secretory proteins are glycosylated in the ER as the glycosylation is crucial for protein structure formation and for protein targeting to cellular compartments. As Tm blocks the first step of N-linked glycosylation, it can efficiently lead to accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER lumen and therefore activate the UPR [3 – 6].
To observe the plant UPR at different growth stages, we describe three experimental approaches to perform ER stress treatment. To investigate long-term ER stress tolerance, seeds are directly germinated on medium containing a relatively low concentration of Tm. Tm can also been infiltrated into leaves to monitor the UPR specifically on ground tissues. Finally, to examine the early outputs of the plant UPR, a short-term Tm treatment using a liquid method is conducted to observe a more instant and direct response to ER stress.
To cope with dynamic ER protein folding demands, the UPR adjusts the transcription of genes function in assembling protein structure, degrading mis-folded protein, and determining cell fates [7, 8]. Hence, the upregulation of well-established UPR target genes, such as BiP3 in Arabidopsis [9], is considered a molecular indicator of UPR activation. To introduce the quantitative method of reading UPR outputs, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of UPR target genes induction is included in this chapter.
2 Materials
Basic reagents and equipment for plant sterile tissue culture and RNA work handling.
Plant growth medium: Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) with Buffer and Sucrose (Caisson LSP04); Phytagel (Sigma P8169).
Growth chamber: temperature set to 21 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark cycle, 100 mEinstein/m2 s, and 65 % humidity.
Tunicamycin (Sigma T7765).
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solvent.
1 ml needleless syringes.
Liquid nitrogen.
RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen 74904).
RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen 79254).
SuperScript® VILO™ Master Mix (Invitrogen 11755500).
Reagents for qRT-PCR: MicroAmp® Fast optical 96-well reaction plate (ABI 4346936); optical adhesive cover (ABI 4311971); FAST SYBR Master Mix (ABI 4385612).
3 Methods
3.1 Germination Under the ER Stress
To examine the tolerant ability of plants in coping with different intensities of ER stress, seeds are directly germinated on medium containing Tm concentrations ranging from 10 to 50 ng/ml. Comparison of phenotype between wild-type plants and mutants of interest can reveal whether the mutants display over-sensitive or resistant growth phenotype under ER stress conditions. The Tm infiltration assay enables the observation of the plant UPR using adult plants.
Sterilize seeds and store at 4 °C for 2 days (see Note 1).
Prepare ½ LS with 0.4 % Phytagel medium.
Autoclave the ½ LS medium on liquid cycle program for 25–40 min.
Dissolve Tm powder in DMSO to prepare 10 mg/ml Tm stock solution (see Note 2).
Prepare 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 µg/ml Tm stock solutions by 1,000, 500, 333, 250, and 200× dilution of 10 mg/ml Tm stock solution respectively using ½ LS liquid medium.
Cool the autoclaved ½ LS medium to 50 °C.
Add 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 µg/ml Tm stock solutions respectively to cooled ½ LS medium (50 °C) by 1,000× dilution to make ½ LS medium containing 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 ng/ml Tm (see Note 3).
Swirl to mix and use a pipette to pour equal amount of Tm-containing medium per plate in the sterile tissue culture hood. Prepare Tm-containing medium freshly right before the Tm germination assay (see Note 4).
For Mock control, the same preparation procedure is carried out with the exception of replacing the Tm in the ½ LS medium with 0.0005 % DMSO.
Germinate Arabidopsis seeds on ½ LS medium containing 0.0005 % DMSO, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 ng/ml Tm. Place a single seed on the medium in an equally spaced manner (see Note 5). Perform the germination at least in triplicate with minimal three individual plates for each Tm concentration and mock control.
Grow the plants under these conditions: 21 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark cycle, 100 mEinstein/m2 s, and 65 % humidity.
Observe the growth phenotype 7–14 days after germination (see Note 6).
Using Col-0 ecotype wild-type Arabidopsis, the plants shows more pronounced growth defects starting from 30 ng/ml Tm (see Fig. 1).
3.2 Tm Infiltration into Leaf Tissues
Dissolve Tm powder in DMSO to prepare 10 mg/ml Tm stock solution (see Note 2).
Prepare 15 µg/ml Tm working solution by 666× dilution of 10 mg/ml Tm stock solution using ½ LS liquid medium. Prepare Tm-containing medium freshly right before the Tm infiltration assay (see Note 4).
Use a needleless syringe to infiltrate ½ LS liquid medium containing 15 µg/ml Tm into abaxial sides of 5-week-old rosette leaves (see Note 7).
For Mock control, the same treatment procedure is performed with the exception of replacing the Tm in the ½ LS liquid medium with 0.0015 % DMSO (see Note 8).
Observe the leaves phenotype 1–4 days after infiltration.
3.3 Short Period of ER Stress Treatment
While the ER stress tolerance assay can examine whether mutants of interest show a plant phenotype under ER stress, even if the mutants display a comparably visible plant phenotype to wild-type plants, it is possible that the defects of UPR in mutants of interest do not reflect on the plant growth morphology. For instance, a mutant of AtbZIP60 shows compromised UPR activation phenotype at a molecular level but displays a similar tolerant plant phenotype when germinated under ER stress [10, 11]. To verify whether genes of interest are involved in the UPR, short-term ER stress treatment coupled with analyses of UPR target genes induction are performed to monitor the UPR at a molecular level.
Sterilize seeds and store at 4 °C for 2 days (see Note 1).
Germinate seeds in vertical plates for 10 days. Medium: ½ LS with 0.4 % Phytagel. Place ten seeds evenly spaced per small round plate (100 × 15 mm) or square plate. Seal the bottom part of plates with parafilm and the upper part of plates with 3M surgical tape (see Fig. 2 and Note 9).
Dissolve Tm powder in DMSO to prepare 10 mg/ml Tm stock solution (see Note 2).
Prepare 5 µg/ml Tm-containing medium by 2,000× dilution of 10 mg/ml Tm stock solution using ½ LS liquid medium. Prepare Tm-containing medium freshly right before the Tm treatment (see Note 2).
Gently transfer 10-day-old vertically grown seedlings to 5 µg/ml Tm-containing medium for an appropriate time period (see Notes 10 and 11).
Collect 10–20 individual Tm-treated seedlings per biological replicate using liquid nitrogen (see Notes 12 and 13).
For Mock control, the same treatment procedure is performed with the exception of replacing the Tm in the ½ LS liquid medium with 0.05 % DMSO.
3.4 Quantitative Measurement of UPR Activation
The regulation of UPR target genes transcription is one of the major outputs of the plant UPR. Hence, measurement of UPR target genes induction under ER stress is a classical method to quantify the plant UPR activation.
Extract RNA from Tm-treated seedlings using an RNeasy plant mini kit and RNase-Free DNase Set.
Synthesize CDNA from RNA using a SuperScript® VILO™ Master Mix.
Perform qRT-PCR with SYBR Green detection in triplicate using the Applied Biosystems 7500 fast real-time PCR system. The primer sequence of UPR target genes is listed in Table 1 [11].
Analyze Data by the DDCT method.
Table 1.
Primers | Sequence (5#x02032;–3′) | Gene |
---|---|---|
BiP1/2-qP For | ccaccggccccaagag | AT5G28540/AT5G42020 |
BiP1/2-qP Rev | ggcgtccacttcgaatgtg | AT5G28540/AT5G42020 |
BiP3-qP For | aaccgcgagcttggaaaat | AT1G09080 |
BiP3-qP Rev | tcccctgggtgcaggaa | AT1G09080 |
AtERdj3A-qP For | tcaagtggtggtggtttcaact | AT3G0890 |
AtERdj3A-qP Rev | cccaccgcccatattttg | AT3G0890 |
AtERdj3B-qP For | gaggaggcggcatgaatatg | AT3G62600 |
AtERdj3B-qP Rev | ccatcgaacctccaccaaaa | AT3G62600 |
PDI6-qP For | cgaagtggctttgtcattcca | AT1G77510 |
PDI6-qP Rev | gcggttgcgtccaatttt | AT1G77510 |
PDI9-qP For | ggccctgttgaagtgactgaa | AT2G32920 |
PDI9-qP Rev | cagcagaaccacacttcttttcc | AT2G32920 |
CNX1-qP For | gtgtcctcgtcgccattgt | AT5G61790 |
CNX1-qP Rev | ttgccaccaaagataagcttga | AT5G61790 |
CRT1-qP For | gatcaagaaggaggtcccatgt | AT1G56340 |
CRT1-qP Rev | gacggaggacgaaggtgtaca | AT1G56340 |
AtERdj2A-qP For | tgggcttgtaggcgctctt | AT1G79940 |
AtERdj2A-qP Rev | aacccaatagttttcctccttgtg | AT1G79940 |
AtERdj2B-qP For | tgaaacgtcccaatggactca | AT4G21180 |
AtERdj2B-qP Rev | cctctttgtggaaaggaaagtaagg | AT4G21180 |
AtP58IPK-qP For | gcgttatagtgatgccctcgat | AT5G03160 |
AtP58IPK-qP Rev | gaaagcgcagggtctgctt | AT5G03160 |
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM101038-01), Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. DOE (DE-FG02-91ER20021), NASA (NNX12AN71G) and the National Science Foundation (MCB 0948584 and MCB1243792).
Footnotes
The quality of seed stock is extremely important for ER stress related assays. Using seeds freshly harvested from healthy plants is one of key points to get dependable and consistent results.
Aliquot Tm stock solution (10 mg/ml) into relatively small amount and store in a −20 °C freezer. Avoid freezing and thawing.
High temperature destabilizes Tm.
Tm-containing medium is unstable if it is not freshly prepared.
For a fair comparison, the distance between seeds should be consistent. Square petri dish with Grid (Fisher 08-757-11A) is useful as a single seed can be placed on the center of each small square area on the plates (see Fig. 1).
The growth phenotype can be more obvious at a relatively early stage (within 1 week) or vice versa. To detect stage-specific phenotypes, the growth of Tm-treated seedlings should be observed every day during the assay.
To fairly compare the ER tolerance between wild-type and mutant plants, choose the same stage, size, and condition of leaves for both varieties of plants.
The infiltration process needs be performed carefully and should not lead to any damage of plants. Leaves infiltrated with DMSO (Mock control) should appear comparable to leaves without infiltration after 1 day.
To allow proper ventilation, do not wrap plates completely with parafilm.
Select well-grown and unstressed seedlings as well as similar growth morphology for all plants.
Using 10-day-old seedlings coupled with a qRT-PCR system, the induction of UPR target genes can be detected starting from 0.5 h. Prolonged treatment is not recommended using this liquid system.
Using more seedlings per biological sample can reduce the standard deviation of fold change of UPR target genes induction between biological replicates.
Sample collection should be done carefully and timely to avoid additional stress before seedlings are frozen by liquid nitrogen.
References
- 1.Kozutsumi Y, Segal M, Normington K, Gething MJ, Sambrook J. The presence of malfolded proteins in the endoplasmic-reticulum signals the induction of glucose-regulated proteins. Nature. 1988;332:462–464. doi: 10.1038/332462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Back SH, Schroder M, Lee K, Zhang KZ, Kaufman RJ. ER stress signaling by regulated splicing: IRE1/HAC1/XBP1. Methods. 2005;35:395–416. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Takatsuk A, Arima K, Tamura G. Tunicamycin, a new antibiotic.1. Isolation and characterization of tunicamycin. J Antibiot. 1971;24:215–223. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.24.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heifetz A, Keenan RW, Elbein AD. Mechanism of action of tunicamycin on the UDP-GlcNAC-dolichyl-phosphate GlcNAC- 1- phosphate transferase. Biochemistry. 1979;18:2186–2192. doi: 10.1021/bi00578a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keller RK, Boon DY, Crum FC. N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase from hen oviduct—solubilization, characterization, and inhibition by tunicamycin. Biochemistry. 1979;18:3946–3952. doi: 10.1021/bi00585a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brandish PE, Kimura K, Inukai M, Southgate R, Lonsdale JT, Bugg TDH. Modes of action of tunicamycin, liposidomycin B, mureidomycin A: inhibition of phospho-Nacetylmuramyl- pentapeptide translocase from Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1640–1644. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.7.1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Acosta-Alvear D, Zhou Y, Blais A, Tsikitis M, Lents NH, Arias C, Lennon CJ, Kluger Y, Dynlacht BD. XBP1 controls diverse cell type- and condition-specifi c transcriptional regulatory networks. Mol Cell. 2007;27:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cox JS, Walter P. A novel mechanism for regulating activity of a transcription factor that controls the unfolded protein response. Cell. 1996;87:391–404. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81360-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Iwata Y, Koizumi N. An Arabidopsis transcription factor, AtbZIP60, regulates the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in a manner unique to plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:5280–5285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408941102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu DP, Christopher DA. Endoplasmic reticulum stress activates the expression of a sub-group of protein disulfi de isomerase genes and AtbZIP60 modulates the response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008;280:199–210. doi: 10.1007/s00438-008-0356-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen YN, Brandizzi F. AtIRE1A/AtIRE1B and AGB1 independently control two essential unfolded protein response pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012;69:266–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]