Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2011 Dec 22;27(2):179–185. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11296

Occurrence of Multidrug-Resistant and Toxic-Metal Tolerant Enterococci in Fresh Feces from Urban Pigeons in Brazil

Vânia Lúcia da Silva 1,*, Natália Cândido Caçador 1, Carolina dos Santos Fernandes da Silva 1, Cláudia Oliveira Fontes 1, Gizele Duarte Garcia 2, Jacques Robert Nicoli 3, Cláudio Galuppo Diniz 1
PMCID: PMC4036010  PMID: 22791051

Abstract

Enterococcus are emerging as important putative pathogens resistant to chemicals that are widely released into the environment, and urban pigeons might act as a natural reservoir contributing to the spread of resistant strains. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of Enterococcus in pigeon feces and their antimicrobial and toxic metal susceptibility. Bacteria were isolated and identified from 150 fresh feces by phenotypic and genetic techniques. Antimicrobial and toxic metal susceptibility was determined by the agar dilution method, and the multiple antibiotic resistance index (MAR) was calculated. Out of 120 isolates, no resistance was observed against penicillin and vancomycin, but was observed against gentamicin (55.8%), chloramphenicol (21.7%), tetracycline (13.3%), ciprofloxacin (8.4%) and rifampin (2.5%). 18.3% presented a MAR index ≥0.2, ranging between 0.14 to 0.57, indicating resistance to more than one antimicrobial. All samples were tolerant to >1024 μg mL−1 zinc and chromium. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1,024 μg mL−1 was observed for copper (100%) and nickel (71.4%). Mercury inhibited 88.4% at 32 μg mL−1 and the MIC for cadmium ranged from 0.125–128 μg mL−1. Since pigeons were found to harbor drug-resistant Enterococcus, our data support that their presence in the urban environment may contribute to the spread of resistance, with an impact on public health.

Keywords: pigeon feces, enterococci, antimicrobial drugs, toxic metals


Urban pigeons (Columba livia) are birds that coexist with humans, especially in urban environments. It is accepted that their adaption to these environments is mainly related to three basic reasons: (i) the architecture of urban buildings, monuments and works of engineering has gaps, cracks and spaces that can be used for landing, nesting and shelter, protecting the birds from the weather; (ii) the absence of natural predators; and (iii) availability of food, as these birds are omnivorous, somewhat selective in their feeding (23). In this way pigeons may have an important role in spreading zoonotic agents to humans as they are a natural reservoir of many microorganisms, including pathogenic enterobacteria and other microbial groups such as Enterococcus(6, 19, 41). The transmission of infectious diseases happens usually by either ingestion of food, water, the handling of products contaminated with their feces. The dispersion of wind-dried pigeon droppings should also be considered as a route of pathogen spread (29, 36).

Enterococci are Gram-positive, facultative anaerobes, arranged in pairs and short chains. These bacteria were considered as harmless inhabitants of the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals, being commonly isolated from feces, water, plants, soil and food products (14, 33). Despite their low virulence, studies have documented that enterococci have been emerging as significant human pathogens (21, 25). Due to their frequent association with infections and their increasing antimicrobial resistance, enterococci have become a serious problem in human medicine as a pathogenic microorganism, as well as nosocomial infection-associated bacteria. Besides natural antimicrobial resistance among Enterococcus species to several antibiotics currently used, they may also acquire resistance determinants through horizontal gene transfer (5).

Furthermore, especially regarding bacteria spread environmentally, the release of toxic and heavy metals in various forms into the environment may contribute to the rise of antimicrobial resistance. In the last decade it was stated that antibiotic-resistant bacteria could arise in the environment through co- or cross-resistance to metals (30).

Considering global issues, such as public health, urban planning and environmental problems, as pigeon populations increase, especially in Brazilian cities, prospective studies are needed to better assess the risks of acquired infections related to multidrug-resistant bacteria that might be spread or released by urban birds (29, 41, 44). This study aimed to evaluate Enterococcus spp. occurrence in fresh fecal samples isolated from urban pigeons in a southeastern Brazilian city, their antimicrobial susceptibility and their toxic metal tolerance patterns.

Material and Methods

Isolation of Enterococcus spp. from pigeon feces

One hundred fifty fresh fecal samples were collected from urban pigeons at different sites in the metropolitan area of the city of Juiz de Fora, Brazil, between May 2007 and May 2008. As the pigeons were fed, fresh feces were collected with sterilized wooden sticks and placed in glass tubes containing sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Bacterial strains representative of different colonial morpho-types were isolated after selective culture in Bile Esculin Agar (Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) supplemented with 0.01% (w/v) sodium azide (Vetec, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Presumptive phenotypic identification included esculin hydrolysis, a catalase test and Gram stain.

Bacterial genus confirmation and species-specific identification

DNA from the presumptively identified bacteria was extracted by chemical digestion with phenol-chloroform, with some modifications (18). Briefly, bacteria cells from 2 mL overnight cultures (approximately 108 CFU) in Brain Heart Infusion broth (Himedia Laboratories) were pelleted by centrifugation and solubilized in 500 μL bacterial lysis buffer (25% [w/v] sucrose, in 50 mmol L−1 Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 10 mmol L−1 EDTA, 2.5 mg mL−1 lysozyme). The culture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. Further, 50 μL of 20% (w/v) SDS solution was added and the culture was left at room temperature for 30 min. DNA was extracted three times with equal volumes of phenol and chloroform, followed by ethanol precipitation and RNAse treatment (10 μg mL−1; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). DNA extracts were stored at −20°C until use.

Enterococcus genus identification was carried out by PCR amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA encoding DNA, as previously described (46), with the primers ENT1 (5′-AGGGGATAACACT TGGAAACA-3′) and ENT2 (5′-TTCGCGACTCGTTGTACTTC-3′). The reactions (25 μL) consisted of 5 ρmol L−1 of each primer, 2 μL template DNA and 12.5 μL of a ready-to-use 2X PCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), with the following amplification conditions: 95°C, 5 min, 30 cycles of 95°C, 30 s, 65°C, 30 s, 72°C, 30 s, and 72°C, 5 min. All the PCR reactions were performed in duplicate in a thermal cycler (Techne TC-412; Southam, Warwickshire, UK). The expected amplicons (1,178 bp) were observed after 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and the reference strain Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51299 was used as a positive control.

Species identification was performed by multiplex PCR as previously described (22), with the exception of E. faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, for which standard PCR was performed (24, 43). The primers and PCR conditions are described in Table 1. Reactions were performed in a 25 μL mixture containing 2.0 μL DNA template, primers at a final concentration of 16 μmol L−1 and 12.5 μL of ready-to-use 2X Qiagen PCR Multiplex Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for multiplex reactions or ready-to-use 2X PCR Master Mix (Promega) for standard PCR. The reactions were performed in an automated thermal cycler (Techne TC-412) and amplicons were observed after 2% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis.

Table 1.

Primers used for PCR reactions, sequences, amplicon size and amplification conditions

PCR Reaction Primers Species Primer sequence (5′ to 3′) Amplicon Amplification conditions
Reaction I (multiplex) CA1 E. casseliflavus TCCTGAATTAGGTGAAAAAAC 288 95°C, 4 min; 30×95°C, 30 s; 55°C, 1 min; 72°C 1 min; 72°C, 7 min.
CA2 GCTAGTTTACCGTCTTTAACG
GA1 E. gallinarum TTACTTGCTGATTTTGATTCG 173
GA2 TGAATTCTTCTTTGAAATCAG
SO1 E. solitarius AAACACCATAACACTTATGTGACG 371
SO2 AATGGAGAATCTTGGTTTGGCGTC
AV1 E. avium GCTGCGATTGAAAAATATCCG 368
AV2 AAGCCAATGATCGGTGTTTTT
CO1 E. columbae GAATTTGGTACCAAGACAGTT 284
CO2 GCTAATTTACCGTTATCGACT
SE1 E. seriolicida ACACAATGTTCTGGGAATGGC 100
SE2 AAGTCGTCAAATGAACCAAAA

Reaction II EF1 E. faecalis GTTTATGCCGCATGGCATAAGAG 310 95°C, 2 min; 26×95°C, 30 s; 60°C, 1 min; 72°C, 1 min; 72°C, 2 min.
EF2 CCGTCAGGGGACGTTCAG

Reaction III EFA1 E. faecium TTGAGGCAGACCAGATTGACG 658 94°C, 5 min; 30×94°C, 1 min; 54°C, 1 min; 72°, 1 min; 72°C, 10 min.
EFA2 TATGACAGCGACTCCGATTCC

Antimicrobial susceptibility assays

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for antimicrobial drugs and toxic metals were determined by the agar dilution method, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guideline (11). Antibiotic or toxic metal stock solutions were added to melted Muller-Hinton (HiMedia) agar to obtain final concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 1,024 μg mL−1. The antimicrobial drugs were selected on the basis of microbial characteristics and clinical relevance: penicillin, gentamicin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, rifampin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin (all MedQuimica, Minas Gerais, Brazil). The reference strains E. faecalis ATCC 51299 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 were included as controls and all tests were performed in duplicate. To determine the level of antibiotic resistance of the individual isolated bacteria, the multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index was calculated according to the literature (26), by dividing the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant by the total number of antibiotics to which the isolates were exposed. A MAR value >0.2 was indicative of multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Toxic metals were selected on the basis of their environmental availability and biologic relevance: nickel (NiCl2·6H2O), zinc (ZnSO4·7H2O), mercury (HgCl2), cadmium (CdCl2·H2O), chromium (Cr(NO3)3) and copper (CuSO4) (all Vetec). The reference strains E. faecalis ATCC 51299, S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were used as a control. All tests were performed in duplicate. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of metal salt that completely inhibited bacterial growth. The results are expressed as the level of tolerance based on toxic concentrations of these substances to other biological systems and compared to the reference values of MIC for the strain E. coli K-12, according to the literature (3, 31).

Results

Out of 150 fecal samples isolated from 150 pigeons in different urban areas of Juiz de Fora, Brazil, 175 strains of Gram-positive cocci presumptively identified as enterococci were recovered and 120 had identity confirmation to the genus level based on the amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA encoding DNA.

Regarding species-specific identification of Enterococcus, four different species were identified: E. faecium (2, 1.66%), E. faecalis (5, 4.16%), Enterococcus solitarius (13, 10.83%) and Enterococcus columbae (81, 67.5%); however, according to the methodology, 19 isolates (15.83%) had no specific identification and were assigned as Enterococcus sp.

The results of the antimicrobial drug susceptibility assays are shown in Table 2, and are presented in terms of MIC50 (lowest concentration that inhibits 50% of bacterial population), MIC90 (lowest concentration that inhibits 90% of bacterial population) and the range of MICs. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for the control strains E. faecalis ATCC 51299 and S. aureus ATCC 29213 were in accordance with CLSI. Penicillin and vancomycin were the most effective drugs, and all enterococci strains were susceptible. Considering all 120 strains, resistance was observed against chloramphenicol (26, 21.7%), tetracycline (16, 13.3%), ciprofloxacin (10, 8.4%) and rifampin (3, 2.5%). Gentamicin was the least effective drug, and high-level gentamicin resistance was observed for 55.8% of enterococci strains.

Table 2.

Susceptibility patterns of Enterococcus spp. (n=120) isolated from urban pigeon (Columba livia) feces in Juiz de Fora, Brazil

Tested antimicrobial drugs Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (μg mL−1) Susceptible strains (%)

MIC50 MIC90 Range
Penicilin 1 4 0.06–8 100.0
Ciprofloxacin 0.48 1 0.06–8 91.6
Rifampin 0.48 4 0.06–32 97.5
Tetracycline 0.48 64 0.12–>512 86.7
Chloramphenicol 8 16 4–16 78.3
Vancomycin 1 1 0.25–4 100.0
Gentamicin 512 512 44.2

MIC50: lowest antimicrobial concentration that inhibits 50% of the tested bacterial population;

MIC90: lowest antimicrobial concentration that inhibits 90% of the tested bacterial population.

Out of 120 evaluated strains, only 21.7% (n=26) were susceptible to all tested drugs, whereas 78.3% (n=94) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial drug. Resistance to more than one antimicrobial drug was observed, and the distribution of antimicrobial drug resistance phenotypes among Enterococcus strains is shown in Table 2. Regarding multi-drug resistance, 22 isolates (18.3%) showed MAR index ≥0.2, which is designated as multiple antimicrobial resistant. Isolates showed variations of the MAR index from 0.14 to 0.57. The species with the highest MAR index was E. faecalis (0.57), which showed simultaneous resistance to four antimicrobials.

As there are no standards for toxic metal susceptibility, we performed the tests according to the CLSI guidelines for antimicrobial drugs (11), and the results were referred to having high or low tolerance to toxic metals. All tested bacteria were tolerant to nickel, copper, zinc and chromium. No cadmium tolerance was observed, but most of the Enterococcus strains were tolerant to mercury, with the exception of 11 E. columbae. Among these mercury-susceptible bacteria, 5 strains were resistant only to gentamicin and 6 were susceptible to all tested antimicrobial drugs (Table 3).

Table 3.

Distribution of antimicrobial drug resistance and metal tolerance phenotypes among Enterococcus spp. (n=120) isolated from urban pigeon (Columba livia) feces in Juiz de Fora, Brazil

Bacterial samples (n) Phenotype Frequency

Antimicrobial resistance Metal tolerance n %
Enterococcus columbae(81) GEN Ni, Cu, Zn, Cr 5 6.17
GEN Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 33 40.74
CLO Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 22 27.16
GEN, TET Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 7 8.64
CLO, CIP Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 1.23
Susceptible to all drugs Ni, Cu, Zn, Cr 6 7.41
Susceptible to all drugs Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 7 8.64

Enterococcus faecalis(5) GEN, TET, CIP Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 20.0
GEN, TET, RIF, CIP Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 20.0
Susceptible to all drugs Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 3 60.0

Enterococcus faecium(2) GEN Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 50.0
GEN, TET Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 50.0

Enterococcus solitarius(13) GEN Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 4 30.76
GEN, CIP Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 5 38.46
GEN, RIF Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 7.69
GEN, RIF, CIP Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 7.69
GEN, TET, CIP Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 7.69
Susceptible to all drugs Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 7.69

Enterococcus sp. (19) CLO Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 3 15.79
TET Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 1 5.27
GEN Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 3 15.79
GEN, TET Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 3 15.79
Susceptible to all drugs Ni, Cu, Zn, Hg, Cr 9 47.36

The break point values for antimicrobial resistance were in agreement with CLSI, 2007 (11). RIF: rifampin; CLO: chloramphenicol; TET: tetracycline; CIP: ciprofloxacin; GEN: gentamicin. The break point values for metal tolerance were: 12.5 μg mL−1 for mercury (Hg), 100 μg mL−1 for cadmium (Cd), 200 μg mL−1 for nickel (Ni), 200 μg mL−1 for copper (Cu), 200 μg mL−1 for zinc (Zn) and 800 μg mL−1 for chromium (Cr) (3, 31).

Overall, all samples were highly tolerant to >1,024 μg mL−1 ZnSO4 and Cr(NO3)3. MIC of 1,024 μg mL−1 was observed for CuSO4 (100%) and NiCl2 (71.4%). Regarding HgCl2, 88.4% of isolates were inhibited at 32 μg mL−1 and the lowest tolerance was observed against CdCl2, with MIC ranging from 0.125–128 μg mL−1, with MIC50 8 μg mL−1, as observed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Metal tolerance patterns of Enterococcus spp. (n=120) isolated from urban pigeon (Columba livia) feces in Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

Tested toxic metals Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (μg mL−1)

MIC50 MIC90 Range
Cadmium (CdCl2·H2O) 8 32 0.125–128
Copper (CuSO4) 1,024 1,024
Chromium (Cr(NO3)3) >1,024 >1,024
Mercury (HgCl2) 32 32 8–128
Nickel (NiCl2·6H2O) 1,024 1,024 256–>1,024
Zinc (ZnSO4·7H2O) >1,024 >1,024

MIC50: lowest antimicrobial concentration that inhibits 50% of the tested bacterial population;

MIC90: lowest antimicrobial concentration that inhibits 90% of the tested bacterial population.

Discussion

The potential spread of infectious agents from animals to humans is high, and this is particularly pronounced in urban birds (20). The food chain may be one way of determining how bacteria are being spread, but environmental pollution is also important (10). In this regard, pigeons could play an important role in fecal contamination of drinking water sources and agricultural crops surrounding urban areas and might also come into close contact with domestic animals, enabling direct transfer of infectious agents. C. livia might also favor the inter-genus or inter-species horizontal spread of drug-resistance genetic determinants, because their feces can harbor several infectious agents representative of different environments that the birds recently visited (10, 20). Since these pigeons have peculiar gut microbiota, it is possible that these microorganisms are not true inhabitants of this ecosystem. The intestinal microbiota of pigeons probably differ from those of gallinaceous species, such as chickens. Pigeons possess a less developed cecum, which is the part of the gastrointestinal tract that harbors the most abundant and diversified microbiota. As a result, it has been suggested that these birds could not have a permanent gut microbiota with intestinal bacterial species commonly associated with humans (20, 41). The feeding habits of urban pigeons could enable them to be contaminated with medically important bacteria or residual antimicrobials and chemicals, since they may rely on garbage or nearby trash cans as food sources (37). Considering the geography of the city of Juiz de Fora, it is hard to address the origin of these urban pigeons. Indeed there are several nosocomial areas as well as public gardens and squares spread around the city, no different from other large metropolitan areas in the world.

Enterococcus species naturally associated with humans are rarely found in pigeons; however, their dietary habits may cause them to be contaminated with different bacterial species, chemical residues and antibiotics (6, 12, 23). Indeed, in our study, we observed not only the presence of E. faecium and E. faecalis in pigeon feces, which are human-related species, but other Enterococcus species showing drug resistance and toxic metal tolerance.

Enterococci infections have become increasingly common due to their intrinsic resistance to several antimicrobial agents and their propensity to acquire resistance genetic determinants from the environment. In this study, the isolates were phenotypically tested for antimicrobial resistance, but no molecular investigation of genes encoding antimicrobial resistance was carried out. In this way, it is difficult to address the origins of drug-resistance determinants or even to track the spread of bacterial strains from the nosocomial environment. None of the isolated bacteria were resistant to penicillin and vancomycin, in agreement with scientific information available from Europe regarding E. faecalis isolated from pigs, chickens, humans and wild rabbits (1, 2, 38, 42). However, in Brazil there are few reports of low β-lactam resistance in enterococci isolated from humans and animal products (8, 13, 16). The observed susceptibility to penicillins and glycopeptides might be a good outcome, since between these antimicrobial substances there are several compounds used to treat severe enterococci-related infections (8, 13). Considering vancomycin, we also did not observe any resistant strain, although for E. faecium isolated from chickens and pigs in Europe, resistance was observed at rates as high as 17% (1, 2). Non-human related enterococci resistance to vancomycin was also reported in Australia where Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus were isolated from the intestinal tracts of slaughter pigs (15).

Glycopeptides are used as the last treatment option for severe nosocomial enterococci-related infections of immuno-compromised patients, once penicillins prove to be ineffective. Resistance to vancomycin among Enterococcus in Brazil has been mostly associated with E. faecalis, contrasting with data from the United States and Europe which have identified E. faecium as the most common vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The lack of community reservoirs of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in Brazil also contrasts with epidemiological findings from Europe (28, 40).

Regarding high-level concentrations of gentamicin (an aminoglycoside), 55.8% of Enterococcus strains isolated in our study were resistant. Fard et al.(15) found susceptibility to high-level gentamicin for enterococci isolated from pigs; however, especially concerning human isolates, the ineffectiveness of this antibiotic was observed near to 20% (8, 13). With regards to animal origin and high-level gentamicin-resistant enterococci, Silva et al.(42) observed low rates of 6.3% among bacteria recovered from wild European rabbit fecal samples.

High-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) was first reported in 1979; thereafter, increasing occurrence has been documented in hospitals worldwide. In previous studies with enterococci isolated in Brazil, the overall prevalence of HLAR among clinical isolates showed a tendency to increase over the years (32). In Brazil, β-lactam in association with gentamicin is one of the first choice drugs to treat severe enterococcal infections (45).

Fluoroquinolones are effective in treating a wide variety of infections and are the antimicrobials of choice for treating invasive gastrointestinal infections in adult humans in many parts of the world. These drugs may also be used to treat enterococal urinary tract infections and it is accepted that urban pigeons may play an important role in spreading quinolone-resistant bacteria, such as E. coli in urban, suburban and agriculture environments (39).

Considering the resistance to ciprofloxacin observed in this study (8.4%), similar rates have been recorded for Enterococcus strains isolated from wild animals worldwide (8.6%), although among bacteria isolated from wild European rabbit fecal samples and humans, the resistance rates are higher as of 14.1% and 30%, respectively (8, 13, 16, 38, 42).

As rifampin remains widely used in Brazil, and in addition to the 2.5% resistance observed, our results show lower resistance rates if compared to other national studies of enterococci isolated from hospitalized patients, which showed resistance rates of about 24% (8). In the same way, regarding tetracyclines, as these drugs are still used as food supplements or therapy in poultry and young animals, the resistance rates observed in this study, considering urban birds (13.3%), were lower than reported in different regions of the globe, including enterococci strains isolated from different animals and other environmental sources (2, 8, 13, 15, 16, 38, 42). Although tetracycline is not routinely used to treat enterococal infections, resistance to this antimicrobial agent is still common among clinical- and environmental-associated strains (27).

According to the literature, chloramphenicol is a broad spectrum antimicrobial largely used in the treatment of nosocomial infections, and enterococci are among the most chloramphenicol-resistant bacteria of human origin, with resistance rates as high as 33% (1, 8, 13, 17). In this study, the resistance observed against this antimicrobial (21.7%) was higher than reported for Enterococcus spp. isolated from other animals (rates of up to 7%), with the exception of some strains isolated from pigs in Spain, which showed resistance rates of 19% (2, 16, 38).

Overall, the frequency of MAR >0.2 observed in our study among the bacteria isolated alerted us to the possible role of urban pigeons as potential agents for the spread of resistance genes. These multi-resistant bacteria may reflect the microbial adaptive response to residual antimicrobials and chemicals in the environment, since pigeons could rely on garbage and also can be found in nosocomial areas.

Resistance to antimicrobials, including toxic metals, is important for bacteria survival in contaminated environments. In most of the times, several antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes might share the same mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids, transposons and integrons (21). As a biologic consequence, these genes might be exchanged among bacteria living in highly contaminated areas. It has been suggested that the combination of antibiotic and metal resistance may not be a fortuitous phenomenon, and bacterial resistance against toxic metals appears to be directly related to the presence of these elements as environmental pollutants; therefore, it is suggested that the natural selective pressure imposed by toxic metals may indirectly select for resistance to antimicrobial drugs (5, 25).

In our study, all enterococci were tolerant to zinc, chromium, nickel and copper. Copper and zinc are extensively used in animals as growth-promoting additives (pigs, livestock, cattle, etc), and that urban pigeons may have contact with these agents through their dietary habits and, in this way, several bacteria species developed resistance mechanisms to survive copper toxicity (4). Copper tolerance, according to the literature, is usually mediated by a plasmid-born tcrB gene, and has been reported in E. faecium and E. faecalis isolated from pigs (2, 15). As for observations for zinc, copper tolerance and antimicrobial resistance have been reported (35).

With regards to mercury and cadmium, we observed low tolerance rates among the isolated enterococci, although mercury resistance is a common plasmid-mediated ability in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (47). This phenomenon might be related to the use of mercurial compounds in industry, agriculture and hospitals. As for Gram-positive bacteria, including E. faecalis, mercury resistance is associated with antibiotic resistance plasmids, particularly those encoding β-lactamases (47). As we did not observe resistance to β-lactam drugs, this is reasonable to explain the low mercury tolerance observed in our study. There is little information available in the literature about enterococci tolerance to cadmium, especially considering bacteria isolated from non-human sources. In general, when reported, no high tolerance has been observed (34).

Different studies have reported toxic metal tolerance among bacteria isolated from diverse environments (31); however, there is a lack of technical standards in these experimental designs, resulting in difficulties for data comparison. To avoid this lack of technical standards, experiments for testing toxic metal susceptibility patterns among the isolated bacteria were performed by the agar dilution technique, as recommended for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (11).

Thus, it is not surprising that toxic metal resistance genes are commonly found in environmental bacteria and that these genes may confer co-resistance or cross-resistance to antimicrobial drugs (7, 31). These co-selection mechanisms include co-resistance, i.e., different resistance determinants present on the same genetic element such as a plasmid, and cross-resistance, i.e., a single phenotype may be associated with both antimicrobial and metal resistance, such as an active efflux pump (7). In this way, the higher rates of toxic metal tolerance at high levels detected in most of the bacterial strains isolated in this study may be the result of toxic metal contamination in the environment. Moreover, it could be a consequence of the use of toxic metals in the urban and surrounding rural environments for water treatment, industry, agriculture and hospital disinfection purposes, among others uses (9).

Despite no correlation between antimicrobial resistance and toxic metal tolerance among the isolated Enterococcus strains, the high toxic metal tolerance patterns observed point to the high selective pressure to which bacterial populations associated to urban pigeons are exposed and the risks of the spread of genetic determinants which might confer, as stated previously, antimicrobial cross-resistance phenotypes.

Overall, in this study, antimicrobial resistance was observed to some antimicrobials that are important for human chemotherapy, especially in susceptible hosts. Such a phenomenon among other opportunistic Enterococcus spp. isolated from fresh urban pigeon feces hugely increases the potential of these birds to act as a reservoir of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and/or -resistant genes that may be transferred to pathogens through the environmental chain. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance and toxic-metal tolerance in bacteria from environmental sources, such as urban pigeon feces, would help to identify relevant factors that contribute to the spread of resistant bacteria and would support the prudent use of antibiotics and discharge or final disposal of metal-contaminated residues.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Natália Bento Barbosa for help with experiments. This study was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Aarestrup FM, Agerso Y, Gemer-Smidt P, Madsen M, Jensen LB. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;37:127–137. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aarestrup FM. Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance among food animals: principles and limitations. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Public Health. 2004;51:380–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Akinbowale OL, Peng H, Grant P, Barton MD. Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance in motile aeromonads and pseudomonads from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in Australia. Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amachawadi RG, Shelton NW, Jacob ME, et al. Occurrence of tcrB gene, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010;7:1089–1097. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aminov RI, Mackie RI. Evolution and ecology of antibiotic resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;271:147–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baele M, Devriese LA, Butaye P, Haesebrouck F. Composition of enterococcal and streptococcal flora from pigeon intestines. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92:348–351. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baker-Austin C, Wright MS, Stepanauskas R, McArthur JV. Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bender EA, de Freitas ALP, Reiter KC, Lutz L, Barth AL. Identification, antimicrobial resistance and genotypic characterization of Enterococcus spp. isolated in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2009;40:693–700. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220090003000035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bruins MR, Kapil S, Oehme FW. Microbial resistance to metals in the environmental. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000;45:198–207. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1999.1860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Butaye P, Baele M, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. Comparison of susceptibility to antimicrobials of the enterococcal species isolated from pigeons (Columba livia) Microb Drug Resist. 2002;8:215–218. doi: 10.1089/107662902760326931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. CLSI document M100-S17. Wayne, PA, USA: 2007. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 17th Informational Supplement. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Costa PM, Vaz-Pires P, Bernardo F. Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. Isolated in inflow, effluent and sludge from municipal sewage water treatment plants. Water Res. 2006;40:1735–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.D’Azevedo PA, Dias CAG, Lemos SK, Bittencourt JAF, Teixeira LM. Antimicrobial susceptibility among Enterococcus isolates from the city of Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2004;35:199–204. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doming KJ, Mayer HK, Kneifel W. Methods used for the isolation, enumeration, characterization and identification of Enterococcus spp.: 2. Pheno- and genotypic criteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;88:165–188. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fard RMN, Heuzenroeder MW, Barton MD. Antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance in commensal enterococci isolated from pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2011;148:276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fracalanzza SAP, Scheidegger EMD, dos Santos PF, Leite PC, Teixeira LM. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of enterococci isolated from poultry meat and pasteurized milk in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem. Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:853–859. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762007005000120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gaetti-Jardim EC, Marqueti AC, Faverani LP, Gaetti-Jardim E., Jr Antimicrobial resistance of aerobes and facultative anaerobes isolates from oral cavity. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;8:551–559. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572010000600004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Giraffa G, Rossetti L, Neviani E. An evaluation of chelex-based DNA purification protocols for the typing of lactic acid bacteria. J. Microbiol Methods. 2000;42:175–184. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00172-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gonzalez-Acuña D, Silva GF, Moreno SL, Cerda LF, Donoso ES, Cabello CJ, López MJ. Detection of some zoonotic agents in the domestic pigeon (Columba livia) in the city of Chillán, Chile. Rev Chil Infect. 2007;24:199–203. doi: 10.4067/s0716-10182007000300004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haag-Wackernagel D, Moch H. Health hazards posed by feral pigeons. J Infect. 2004;48:307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hammerum AM, Lester CH, Heuer OE. Antimicrobial-resistant enterococci in animals and meat: a human health hazard? Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010;7:1137–1146. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jackson CR, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Barret JB. Use of a genus and species-specific multiplex PCR for identification of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3558–3565. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3558-3565.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jokimäki J, Suhonen J. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc Urb Plan. 1998;39:253–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kariyama R, Mitsuhata R, Chow JW, Clewell DB, Kumon H. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for surveillance isolates of vancmycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3092–3095. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.8.3092-3095.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kimiran-Erdem A, Arslan EO, Yurudu NOS, Zeybek Z, Dogruoz N, Cotuk A. Isolation and identification of enterococci from seawater samples: assessment of their resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals. Environ Monit Assess. 2007;125:219–228. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9506-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krumperman PH. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing Escherichia coli to identify risk sources of faecal contamination of foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;46:165–170. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.165-170.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Luczkiewicz A, Jankowska K, Fudala-Ksiqzek S, Olanczuk-Neyman K. Antimicrobial resistance of fecal indicators in municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2010;44:5089–5097. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mannu L, Paba A, Daga E, Comunian R, Zanetti S, Duprè I, Sechi LA. Comparison of the incidence of virulence determinants and antibiotic resistance between Enterococcus faecium strains of dairy, animal and clinical origin. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;88:291–304. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Marques SMT, de Cuadros RM, Silva CJ, Baldo M. Parasites of pigeons (Columba livia) in urban areas of lages, southern Brazil. Parasitol Latinoam. 2007;62:183–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Matyar F, Kaya A, Dinçer S. Antibacterial agents and heavy metal resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from seawater, shrimp and sediment in Iskenderun Bay, Turkey. Sci Total Environ. 2008;407:279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Matyar F, Akkan T, Uçak Y, Eraslan B. Aeromonas and Pseudomonas: antibiotic and heavy metal resistance species from Iskenderun Bay, Turkey (northeast Mediterranean Sea) Environ Monit Assess. 2010;167:309–320. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1051-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mondino SSB, Castro ACD, Mondino PJJ, da Carvalho MGS, Silva KMF, Teixeira LM. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of clinical and intestinal enterococci isolated from inpatients and outpatients in two Brazilian hospitals. Microb Drug Res. 2003;9:167–174. doi: 10.1089/107662903765826769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moore DF, Zhowandai MH, Ferguson DM, McGee C, Mott JB, Stewart JC. Comparison of 16S rRNA sequencing with conventional and commercial phenotypic techniques for identification of enterococci from the marine environment. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100:1272–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nakipoǧlu Y, Gümüş D, Sertel-Şelale D, Küçüker MA. In vitro susceptibility of Enterococcus strains to high level aminoglycosides and heavy metals. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009;43:545–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nemergut DR, Martin AP, Schmidt SK. Integron diversity in heavy-metal contaminated mine tailings and inferences about integron evolution. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:1160–1168. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1160-1168.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oliveira AJFC, Pinhata JMW. Antimicrobial resistance and species composition of Enterococcus spp. isolated from waters and sands of marine recreational beaches in Southeastern Brazil. Water Res. 2008;42:2242–2250. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oshiro R, Fujioka R. Sand, soil, and pigeon droppings: sources of indicator bacteria in the waters of Hanauma bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Water Sci Technol. 1995;31:251–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Poeta P, Costa D, Sáenz Y, Klibi N, Ruiz-Larrea F, Rodrigues J, Torres C. Characterization of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in faecal enterococci of wild animals in Portugal. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Public Health. 2005;52:396–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Radimersky T, Frolkova P, Janoszowska D, Dolejska M, Svec P, Roubalova E, Cikova P, Cizek A, Literak I. Antibiotic resistance in faecal bacteria (Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp.) in feral pigeons. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;109:1687–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rossi F. The challenges of antimicrobial resistance in Brazil. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1138–1143. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Silva VL, Nicoli JR, Nascimento TC, Diniz CG. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains recovered from urban pigeons (Columba livia) in Brazil and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Curr Microbiol. 2009;59:302–308. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9434-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Silva N, Igrejas G, Figueiredo N, Gonçalves A, Radhouani H, Rodrigues J, Poeta P. Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci and Escherichia coli isolates from European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:4871–4876. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Souto R, Colombo APV. Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in subgingival biofilm and saliva of subjects with chronic periodontal infection. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53:155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tanaka C, Miyazawa T, Watarai M, Ishiguro N. Bacteriological survey of feces from feral pigeons in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2005;67:951–953. doi: 10.1292/jvms.67.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Titze-de-Almeida R, Rollo Filho M, Nogueira CA, et al. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from Brazilian intensive care units. Braz J Infect Dis. 2004;8:197–205. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702004000300002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yean CY, Yin LS, Lalitha P, Ravichandran M. A nan-oplex PCR assay for the rapid detection of vancomycin and bifunctional aminoglycoside resistance genes in Enterococcus species. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zscheck KK, Murray BE. Evidence for a staphylococcal-like mercury resistance gene in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1287–1289. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.6.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES