Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2014 May 28;5:228. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00228

Plant cell wall dynamics and wall-related susceptibility in plant–pathogen interactions

Daniela Bellincampi 1, Felice Cervone 1, Vincenzo Lionetti 1,*
PMCID: PMC4036129  PMID: 24904623

Abstract

The cell wall is a dynamic structure that often determines the outcome of the interactions between plants and pathogens. It is a barrier that pathogens need to breach to colonize the plant tissue. While fungal necrotrophs extensively destroy the integrity of the cell wall through the combined action of degrading enzymes, biotrophic fungi require a more localized and controlled degradation of the cell wall in order to keep the host cells alive and utilize their feeding structures. Also bacteria and nematodes need to degrade the plant cell wall at a certain stage of their infection process, to obtain nutrients for their growth. Plants have developed a system for sensing pathogens and monitoring the cell wall integrity, upon which they activate defense responses that lead to a dynamic cell wall remodeling required to prevent the disease. Pathogens, on the other hand, may exploit the host cell wall metabolism to support the infection. We review here the strategies utilized by both plants and pathogens to prevail in the cell wall battleground.

Keywords: cell wall, cell wall integrity, host cell wall metabolism reprogramming, plant defense, susceptibility factors

INTRODUCTION

Phytopathogenic fungi, bacteria, and nematodes infect, grow and reproduce themselves on the plant tissues and, at least at the early stages of infection, require breaking the integrity of the host cell wall. Beyond the cuticle layer, the interaction with the plant cell wall and the extent of the wall degradation are determined by the lifestyle of the pathogen. Plants perceive a diverse set of microbial molecules referred to as microbial/pathogen associated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs; Boller and He, 2009) through high-affinity cell surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) leading to intracellular signaling, transcriptional reprogramming, and biosynthesis of defense metabolites that limit the microbial infection (Dangl et al., 2013). Emerging evidences indicate that plant cells also exploit sophisticated mechanisms of sensing the alteration of cell wall integrity (CWI) during biotic stress (Hamann, 2012; Pogorelko et al., 2013a). For instance, they perceive endogenous molecules produced in damaged tissues (the so-called damage-associated molecular patterns, or DAMPs) through membrane receptors (Ferrari et al., 2013). The loss of CWI induced by pathogens activates a variety of defense responses including a cell wall remodeling required to prevent the disease. To escape recognition, pathogens produce effector proteins that counteract the plant defenses (Giraldo and Valent, 2013) and, sometimes, exploit the host cell wall metabolism to favor the infection process (Cantu et al., 2008b).

CELL WALL DYNAMICS DURING INFECTION BY MICROBIAL PATHOGENS

Infection by fungal necrotrophs is a complex process that includes conidial attachment, germination, host penetration, lesion formation and expansion, and tissue maceration followed by sporulation (Prins et al., 2000). Penetration may be achieved by degrading the external cuticle through the action of cutinases and lipases (Laluk and Mengiste, 2010). The role of the cuticle in plant defense is discussed elsewhere (Chassot and Metraux, 2005; Chassot et al., 2007). Once penetrated the cuticle, necrotrophs have a spatial and temporal strategy of attacking the plant cell wall by producing several cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs) belonging to multiple families (Figure 1A). The diversity of these enzymes mirrors the structural complexity and the dynamics of the cell wall as well as the lifestyle and host adaptation of the pathogen (King et al., 2011). The extensive degradation of cell wall polysaccharides by necrotrophs is sensed by plants. The leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) ERECTA (ER) and the heterotrimeric G-protein are involved in cell wall remodeling during Arabidopsis defense response against Plectosphaerella cucumerina and probably control CWI (Llorente et al., 2005; Sanchez-Rodriguez et al., 2009). The impairment of cellulose synthases involved in secondary cell wall deposition is also a mechanism of sensing CWI and enhances disease resistance of Arabidopsis to P. cucumerina and Ralstonia solanacearum (Hernandez-Blanco et al., 2007).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Cell wall dynamics during necrotrophs invasion. (A) Necrotrophic fungi secrete a large arsenal of cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs) like PGs, hemicellulases and cellulases, assisted by PMEs and AEs in the apoplastic space to degrade cell wall polymers and facilitate the availability of nutrients. PGs and EIXs have been proposed to function as PAMPs recognized by the membrane receptors RBPG1 and Eix1 or 2, respectively. (B) As first line of defense, plants produce a variety of CWDE inhibitors to hinder degradation by microbial CWDEs. For instance, the inhibition of PG degrading activity by PGIPs induces the accumulation of elicitor-active pectin fragments (OGs) perceived by WAK1 receptors. It cannot be excluded the presence of other not yet identified receptors sensing damage of other cell wall components. The perception of cell wall damage triggers specific signaling pathways activating defense responces aimed to reinforce cell wall structure. The more evident defense strategies are callose and lignin deposition, induction of peroxidases/ROS-mediated crosslinks between cell wall structural proteins and polysaccharides. (C) Necrotrophs force plants to cooperate in disease exploiting plant cellulases, expansins, PGs and PMEs as susceptibility factors. PM, plasma membrane; CW, cell wall; Cyt, cytoplasm; OGs, oligogalacturonides; WAK1, wall associated kinase 1; AEs, acetyl esterases; PGs, polygalacturonases; EIXs, ethylen induced xylanases; PME, pectin methylesterases; PMEI, pectin methylesterase inhibitor; FA, ferulic acid; Eix1-2, receptors of ethylene induced xylanases; RBPG1, Responsiveness to Botrytis PolyGalacturonase 1; Ca2+, calcium ions; XI, xylanase inhibitor; PRR, pattern recognition receptor; POX, peroxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

One of the strategies used by plants to limit the degradation of the cell wall polysaccharides by microbial CWDEs is the production of proteinaceous inhibitors (Figures 1A, B). Polygalacturonases (PGs) are pathogenicity factors produced at the earlier stages of a microbial infection that depolymerize the homogalacturonan (HG), i.e., the main component of pectin in dicots but also present in monocots (Caprari et al., 1993; D’Ovidio et al., 2004). Against microbial and insect PGs, plants produce cell wall-associated polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs; Spadoni et al., 2006). The over expression of PGIPs improves the resistance to fungal and bacterial necrotrophs in different plants (Aguero et al., 2005; Ferrari et al., 2012). The PG-PGIP interaction results in the accumulation of elicitor-active oligogalacturonides (OGs) that are perceived in Arabidopsis by the receptor Wall Associated Kinase 1 (WAK1; Brutus et al., 2010) to activate the plant immune responses (Ferrari et al., 2013). Accumulation and sensing of OGs in response to pathogens is critical for monitoring the pectin integrity and, in general, a tissue injury (De Lorenzo et al., 2011). Alteration of pectin integrity caused by the expression of PGII from Aspergillus niger in tobacco and Arabidopsis causes a constitutive activation of defense genes and resistance against Botrytis cinerea (Ferrari et al., 2008). Recently, B. cinerea and A. niger PGs have been proposed to function themselves as PAMPs recognized by the Arabidopsis Receptor-Like Responsiveness to Botrytis PolyGalacturonase 1 (RBPG1) belonging to a super clade of LRR receptor-like proteins (RLPs; Zhang et al., 2014).

Xylan is the major hemicellulose polymer in cereals. To counteract xylan degradation by microbial endoxylanases, graminaceous monocots produce the Triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor (TAXI), the xylanase inhibitor protein (XIP) and the thaumatin-like xylanase inhibitor (TL-XI; Bellincampi et al., 2004; Juge, 2006). The constitutive expression of TAXI-III in wheat reduces susceptibility to Fusarium graminearum (Moscetti et al., 2013). On the other hand, fungal xylanases function as PAMPs by eliciting defense responses and promoting necrosis (Noda et al., 2010; Sella et al., 2013). Ethylene inducing xylanases (EIXs) produced by Trichoderma species are perceived in tomato, by two specific LRR-RLPs receptors, LeEix1 and LeEix2 (Ron and Avni, 2004). Both receptors bind Eixs, while only LeEix2 mediates defense responses. LeEix1 heterodimerizes with LeEix2 upon application of the Eixs and attenuates Eix-induced internalization and signaling of the LeEix2 receptor (Bar et al., 2010). Xyloglucan, i.e., the main hemicellulosic polysaccharide in the primary walls of dicots and non-graminaceous monocots, is degraded by microbial xyloglucan-specific endoglucanases (XEGs). Fungal XEGs are inhibited by xyloglucan endoglucanase inhibiting proteins (XEGIPs), which so far have been characterized in tomato, carrot and tobacco (Juge, 2006).

Reinforcement of the cell wall is initiated at the pathogen penetration sites in response to cell wall damage (Figure 1B). Deposition of callose by the callose synthase PMR4 occurs upon infection of Arabidopsis with P. cucumerina and Alternaria brassicicola (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Flors et al., 2008). Callose deposition is triggered by PAMPs and DAMPs, is affected by environmental conditions and requires the apoplastic accumulation of the hydrolysis products of glucosinolates or benzoxazinoid metabolites (Galletti et al., 2008; Ahmad et al., 2011; Luna et al., 2011).

Deposition of lignin has been associated to resistance of cotton to Verticillium dahliae and of Camelina sativa to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Xu et al., 2011; Eynck et al., 2012). Lignin makes the cell wall more resistant to CWDEs and also prevents the diffusion of pathogen-produced toxins (Sattler and Funnell-Harris, 2013). The cell wall may also be reinforced by cross-links and insolubilization of structural proteins like the hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs) by peroxidase-mediated isodityrosine linkages formed in response to pathogen attach (Deepak et al., 2010). Plant peroxidases catalyze cross-links between phenolic compounds in the secondary walls and between polysaccharides and ferulic acid (FA) upon attack by necrotrophs (Passardi et al., 2004). Crosslinks between FA and polysaccharides enhance the recalcitrance of the cell wall to digestion by microbial CWDEs and the overall resistance to fungi (Bily et al., 2003). On the other hand, fungal FA esterases may shear FA from the cell wall polysaccharides (Udatha et al., 2012).

The activities of pectin methyl esterases (PMEs) from both plants and pathogens and the degree and pattern of pectin methyl esterification are critical for the outcome of plant–pathogen infections (Lionetti et al., 2012). The cell walls containing highly methylesterified pectin are somewhat protected against the action of microbial PGs and pectate lyases (PLs; Arancibia and Motsenbocker, 2006). PMEs, which remove methyl esters from pectin, are controlled by PME inhibitor proteins (PMEIs) either during growth and development (Raiola et al., 2004; Rocchi et al., 2011; Reca et al., 2012) and during plant–pathogen interactions (Lionetti et al., 2012). The biochemical and structural bases of the enzyme/inhibitor interaction have been elucidated (Mattei et al., 2002; Di Matteo et al., 2005). Arabidopsis over expressing PMEIs have a lower level of PME activity, a higher degree of pectin esterification and a concomitant reduced susceptibility to B. cinerea and Pectobacterium carotovorum (Lionetti et al., 2007; Raiola et al., 2011). The ectopic expression in wheat of a PME inhibitor from kiwi reduces the susceptibility to F. graminearum and Bipolaris sorokiniana (Volpi et al., 2011). The transcription factor MYB46 which affect the secondary cell wall biosynthesis (Zhong et al., 2007), regulates the expression of genes encoding several cell wall proteins including PMEI and mediates disease susceptibility of Arabidopsis to B. cinerea (Ramirez et al., 2011). Recently, jasmonic acid has been proposed to modulate the degree of methylesterification in potato to protect pectin degradation by PLs produced by Dickeya dadantii (Taurino et al., 2014). Acetylation of the cell wall polysaccharides is also a determinant of plant–pathogen interaction. An Arabidopsis mutant with reduced acetylation displays increased tolerance to B. cinerea (Manabe et al., 2011). Arabidopsis and Brachypodium distachyon plants expressing xylan or pectin acetylesterases from A. nidulans activate specific defense responses and are more resistant to B. cinerea and B. sorokiniana (Pogorelko et al., 2013b).

Biotrophic and hemi-biotrophic fungi acquire nutrients from the host cells without causing their death. They often attack the plant surface and penetrate the external barriers by developing appressoria and exploiting the mechanical pressure (Wilson and Talbot, 2009). In order to breach the host cuticle they also secrete oxidases, esterases, cutinases, and lipases (Feng et al., 2011). Small amounts of CWDEs associated with local softening and loosening of plant cell walls are produced by biotrophic microorganisms (Zhao et al., 2013) (Figure 2A). Plants contrast invasion of biotrophs by the apposition of “papillae,” cell wall thickening early produced at the site of pathogen penetration (Figure 2B). Papillae contain callose, as most abundant constituent, cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectins, lignin, and structural proteins such as arabinogalactan proteins and HRGPs (Aist, 1976; Celio et al., 2004; Voigt, 2014). Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the callose synthase PMR4 show an early and elevated deposition of callose at the sites of penetration which prevents the haustoria formation and further penetration by Golovinomyces cichoracearum and Blumeria graminis (Ellinger et al., 2013). Papillae are also the sites where antimicrobial peptides, toxic secondary metabolites and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate and contribute to plant resistance (Bednarek et al., 2009; Daudi et al., 2012). Lignification and cross-links of proteins in the papillar cell wall may entrap the penetration peg of biotrophic fungi and render the cell wall more resistant to the mechanical pressure exerted by fungal appressoria (Bechinger et al., 1999; O’Brien et al., 2012). Lignin downregulation may also activate defense responses and increases the resistance to the hemibiotroph Colletotrichum trifolii in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) (Gallego-Giraldo et al., 2011).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Cell wall dynamics in plant-biotrophic fungi interaction. (A) Biotrophic fungi use appressorial mechanical pressure and secrete cell wall degrading enzymes to penetrate plant cell wall. (B) Plants perceive fungal biotrophs penetration with not yet identified receptors and respond with “papillae” apposition between cell wall and plasma membrane. Papillae, in addition to new cell wall material are also sites of accumulation of ROS possibly involved in cell wall reinforcement. (C) At a later stage of infection, fungus forms the haustorium feeding organ invaginated into the host membranes and plant cell wall. Biotrophs locally affect cell wall metabolism by induction of susceptibility factors (callose synthase PMR4, O-acetyltransferase PMR5 and pectate lyase PMR6) to modify the extrahaustorial matrix to improve the accessibility of nutrients or to ensure the mechanical stability of the haustorium. PM, plasma membrane; CW, cell wall; Cyt, cytoplasm; PG, polygalacturonase; PME, pectin methylesterase; PRR, pattern recognition receptor; POX, peroxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

A reduced cellulose content by mutation of cellulose synthase CESA3, involved in primary cell wall formation, leads to production of lignin, and makes Arabidopsis more resistant to different powdery mildew pathogens (Ellis and Turner, 2001; Ellis et al., 2002; Cano-Delgado et al., 2003). RLKs belonging to the Catharanthus roseus (CrRLK)-like protein family are implicated in CWI mechanisms. Among these, THESEUS1 (THE1) is required for lignification in response to inhibition of cellulose biosynthesis (Hematy et al., 2007).

Alteration of pectin integrity can trigger plant immunity also against hemibiotrophs (Ferrari et al., 2008; Bethke et al., 2013). Arabidopsis PMEs, triggered by a Jasmonic acid dependent pathway, contribute to plant immunity against Pseudomonas syringae(Bethke et al., 2013).

MICROBIAL PATHOGENS EXPLOIT THE HOST CELL WALL METABOLISM TO FACILITATE PATHOGENESIS

Necrotrophs can force plants to cooperate in disease by altering the host cell wall and favoring the cell wall accessibility to CWDEs (Hok et al., 2010; Figure 1C). The Arabidopsis AtPME3 is induced upon infection with B. cinerea and P. carotovorum and functions as susceptibility factor required for the initial colonization of the host tissue (Raiola et al., 2011). A PG (LePG) and expansin (LeExp1) cooperatively contribute to cell wall loosening during tomato ripening; their expression is induced by necrotrophic pathogens to successfully infect fruits (Cantu et al., 2009). Transgenic tomato fruits with suppressed expression of LePG and LeExp1 exhibit a reduced susceptibility to B. cinerea (Cantu et al., 2008a). Silencing of two putative endo β-1,4-endoglucanases, involved in the hydrolysis of cellulose or hemicellulose during ripening, cause a reduced susceptibility of tomato fruits to B. cinerea (Flors et al., 2007).

Biotrophic fungi, at a later stage of infection, produce a limited and localized degradation of the cell wall in the epidermal or mesophyll cells (Herbert et al., 2004). On the other hand, they form intracellular structures, like the “haustoria,” i.e., feeding organs invaginated into the host membranes to acquire nutrients. Biotrophs need to avoid the host defense responses and carefully regulate the cell-wall degradation at the border of their feeding structures to allow fungal accommodation and haustorium function (Figure 2C). A screening for Arabidopsis powdery mildew-resistant mutants allowed isolating two pectin-related genes, PMR5 and PMR6 which are pathogen-induced and required for susceptibility to G. cichoracearum and G. orontii (Vogel et al., 2002, 2004). PMR5 encodes a protein with unknown function that shares sequence similarity with genes encoding polysaccharide O-acetyltransferase (Gille and Pauly, 2012). Therefore, acetylation may be a host susceptibility mechanism that is reprogrammed by biotrophs during infection. PMR6 encodes a putative PL that is, possibly, recruited by the fungi as a susceptible factor to reduce Ca++-pectate domains at the level of haustoria-plasma membrane and facilitate cell wall porosity and accessibility of host nutrients (Vogel et al., 2002). Callose deposition may also work in favor of the pathogen by contributing to the stability and function of the haustoria and acting as a barrier that renders haustoria less susceptible to toxic metabolites that are produced by the host and accumulate in the site of infection (Jacobs et al., 2003). On the other hand, callose may limit the diffusion of pathogen-derived elicitors, thus reducing the activation of defense responses (Underwood, 2012).

Many bacterial pathogens utilize a type III secretion system to inject effector proteins directly into the host cytoplasm and manipulate the host cellular activities to their own advantage (Buttner and He, 2009). The effector AvrPto of P. syringae suppresses a set of Arabidopsis genes that encode cell wall-related defense proteins such as HRGPs (Hauck et al., 2003).

CELL WALL DYNAMICS IN PLANT INTERACTIONS WITH NEMATODES AND VIRUSES

Changes in the cell wall metabolism occur during plant infection by nematodes (Barcala et al., 2010; Bohlmann and Sobczak, 2014). Like biotrophic pathogens, root-knot and cyst nematodes need to establish feeding structures inside the plant tissue to allow the uptake of nutrients (Davis et al., 2004; Williamson and Kumar, 2006). This process is assisted by the secretion of CWDEs such as pectinases and cellulases produced by the nematodes, (Vanholme et al., 2004; Davis et al., 2008) and by the local expression of host proteins like expansins and cellulases (Wieczorek et al., 2006, 2008). The sugar beet cyst nematode Heterodera schactii infects Arabidopsis roots and exploits the host-encoded AtPME3. Transgenic plants overexpressing AtPME3 exhibit an increased susceptibility to the nematode. It has been proposed that AtPME3 locally reduces the pectin esterification and improves the cell wall loosening of pre-syncytial cells during the early stages of syncytium formation (Hewezi et al., 2008).

Callose deposition at the level of plasmodesmata (PD) limits the cell-to-cell spreading of plant viruses. Due to the small diameter of the PD pore, some viruses utilize the viral movement proteins (MPs) to modify the PD size exclusion limit. Specific interactions of viral MPs with PME are often required (Chen et al., 2000). In addition to MP-PME interaction, the PME-dependent formation of methanol has also been reported to be important for viral cell-to-cell movement (Dorokhov et al., 2012; Komarova et al., 2014). The overexpression of PME inhibitor proteins in tobacco and Arabidopsis contrasts the cell-to-cell and systemic movement of tobamoviruses (Lionetti et al., 2013).

CONCLUSION

The cell wall is the battleground where plants and pathogens attempt to prevail by implementing contrasting wall-reinforcing and wall-weakening strategies. When pathogens start degrading the plant cell wall components, plants are capable of perceiving the loss of wall integrity and subsequently activate the defense signaling pathways. Pathogens try to escape the plant defenses and sometimes take advantage of the host cell wall metabolism to facilitate their entry into the tissue. These dynamic processes vary according to the lifestyle of the pathogen and the type of plant pathogen interaction. While necrotrophy involves a strong and diffused molecular warfare that may provoke extended lesions of the tissue, during biotrophy the battle involves a weaker cell wall degradation mainly localized at the point of penetration and at the level of the feeding apparatus. Perception of cell wall damage as well as the pathogen- and host-induced cell wall remodeling occurs in both cases. The damage of specific cell wall polysaccharides during infection may be perceived by receptors as THE1, ER and WAK1. Plants may also rely on the recognition of CWDEs by LRR-RLPs receptors, as RBPG1 and LeEIX1-2. Cell wall fragments may be released during infection and sensed as damage signals. Analysis of cell wall mutants has shed light on the relationship between cell wall remodeling and plant response to pathogens. The expression of endogenous and microbial CWDEs and their inhibitors is also a valuable approach for studying the dynamics of the cell wall during plant–pathogen interactions as well as a strategy to improve plant protection.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The Review Editor, Dr Ferrari, declares that, despite being affiliated to the same institution as authors Dr Daniela Bellincampi and Dr Felice Cervone, the review process was handled objectively. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to apologize to those people whose relevant publications could not be cited because of space constraints. This research was supported by the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant, 233083).

REFERENCES

  1. Aguero C. B., Uratsu S. L., Greve C., Powell A. L. T., Labavitch J. M., Meredith C. P., et al. (2005). Evaluation of tolerance to pierce’s disease and botrytis in transgenic plants of Vitis vinifera L. expressing the pear PGIP gene. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6 43–51 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00262.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad S., Veyrat N., Gordon-Weeks R., Zhang Y. H., Martin J., Smart L., et al. (2011). Benzoxazinoid metabolites regulate innate immunity against aphids and fungi in maize. Plant Physiol. 157 317–327 10.1104/pp.111.180224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aist J. R. (1976). Papillae and related wound plugs of plant cells. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 14 145–163 10.1146/annurev.py.14.090176.001045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arancibia R. A., Motsenbocker C. E. (2006). Pectin methylesterase activity in vivo differs from activity in vitro and enhances polygalacturonase-mediated pectin degradation in tabasco pepper. J. Plant Physiol. 163 488–496 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.06.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bar M., Sharfman M., Ron M., Avni A. (2010). BAK1 is required for the attenuation of ethylene-inducing xylanase (Eix)-induced defense responses by the decoy receptor LeEix1. Plant J. 63 791–800 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04282.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barcala M., Garcia A., Cabrera J., Casson S., Lindsey K., Favery B., et al. (2010). Early transcriptomic events in microdissected Arabidopsis nematode-induced giant cells. Plant J. 61 698–712 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04098.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bechinger C., Giebel K. F., Schnell M., Leiderer P., Deising H. B., Bastmeyer M. (1999). Optical measurements of invasive forces exerted by appressoria of a plant pathogenic fungus. Science 285 1896–1899 10.1126/science.285.5435.1896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bednarek P., Pislewska-Bednarek M., Svatos A., Schneider B., Doubsky J., Mansurova M., et al. (2009). A glucosinolate metabolism pathway in living plant cells mediates broad-spectrum antifungal defense. Science 323 101–106 10.1126/science.1163732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellincampi D., Camardella L., Delcour J. A., Desseaux V., D’Ovidio R., Durand A., et al. (2004). Potential physiological role of plant glycosidase inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1696 265–274 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bethke G., Grundman R. E., Sreekanta S., Truman W., Katagiri F., Glazebrook J. (2013). Arabidopsis pectin methylesterases contribute to immunity against pseudomonas syringae. Plant Physiol. 164 1093–1107 10.1104/pp.113.227637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bily A. C., Reid L. M., Taylor J. H., Johnston D., Malouin C., Burt A. J., et al. (2003). Dehydrodimers of ferulic acid in maize grain pericarp and aleurone: resistance factors to Fusarium graminearum. Phytopathology 93 712–719 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.6.712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohlmann H., Sobczak M. (2014). The plant cell wall in the feeding sites of cyst nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 5:89 10.3389/fpls.2014.00089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boller T., He S. Y. (2009). Innate immunity in plants: an arms race between pattern recognition receptors in plants and effectors in microbial pathogens. Science 324 742–744 10.1126/science.1171647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brutus A., Sicilia F., Macone A., Cervone F, De Lorenzo G. (2010). A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 9452–9457 10.1073/pnas.1000675107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Buttner D., He S. Y. (2009). Type III protein secretion in plant pathogenic bacteria. Plant Physiol. 150 1656–1664 10.1104/pp.109.139089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cano-Delgado A., Penfield S., Smith C., Catley M., Bevan M. (2003). Reduced cellulose synthesis invokes lignification and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 34 351–362 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01729.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cantu D., Blanco-Ulate B., Yang L., Labavitch J. M., Bennett A. B, Powell A. L. T. (2009). Ripening-regulated susceptibility of tomato fruit to botrytis cinerea requires nor but not rin or ethylene. Plant Physiol. 150 1434–1449 10.1104/pp.109.138701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cantu D., Vicente A. R., Greve L. C., Dewey F. M., Bennett A. B., Labavitch J. M., et al. (2008a). The intersection between cell wall disassembly, ripening, and fruit susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 859–864 10.1073/pnas.0709813105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cantu D., Vicente A. R., Labavitch J. M., Bennett A. B., Powell A. L. (2008b). Strangers in the matrix: plant cell walls and pathogen susceptibility. Trends Plant Sci. 13 610–617 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Caprari C., Bergmann C., Migheli Q., Salvi G., Albersheim P., Darvill A., et al. (1993). Fusarium moniliforme secretes four endopolygalacturonases derived from a single gene product. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 43 453–462 10.1006/pmpp.1993.1073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Celio G. J., Mims C. W., Richardson E. A. (2004). Ultra-structure and immuno cytochemistry of the host–pathogen interface in poinsettia leaves infected with powdery mildew. Can. J. Bot. 82 421–429 10.1139/b04-019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chassot C., Metraux J. P. (2005). The cuticle as source of signals for plant defense. Plant Biosyst. 139 28–31 10.1080/11263500500056344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chassot C., Nawrath C., Metraux J. P. (2007). Cuticular defects lead to full immunity to a major plant pathogen. Plant J. 49 972–980 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.03017.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen M. H., Sheng J., Hind G., Handa A. K., Citovsky V. (2000). Interaction between the tobacco mosaic virus movement protein and host cell pectin methylesterases is required for viral cell-to-cell movement. EMBO J. 19 913–920 10.1093/emboj/19.5.913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. D’Ovidio R., Mattei B., Roberti S., Bellincampi D. (2004). Polygalacturonases, polygalacturonase–inhibiting proteins and pectic oligomers in plant–pathogen interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1696 237–244 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dangl J. L., Horvath D. M., Staskawicz B. J. (2013). Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science 341 746–751 10.1126/science.1236011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Daudi A., Cheng Z. Y., O’Brien J. A., Mammarella N., Khan S., Ausubel F. M., et al. (2012). The apoplastic oxidative burst peroxidase in arabidopsis is a major component of pattern-triggered immunity. Plant Cell 24 275–287 10.1105/tpc.111.093039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Davis E. L., Hussey R. S., Baum T. J. (2004). Getting to the roots of parasitism by nematodes. Trends Parasitol. 20 134–141 10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Davis E. L., Hussey R. S., Mitchum M. G., Baum T. J. (2008). Parasitism proteins in nematode–plant interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11 360–366 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deepak S., Shailasree S., Kini R. K., Muck A., Mithofer A., Shetty S. H. (2010). Hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins and plant defense. J. Phytopathol. 158 585–593 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01669.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. De Lorenzo G., Brutus A., Savatin D. V., Sicilia F., Cervone F. (2011). Engineering plant resistance by constructing chimeric receptors that recognize damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). FEBS Lett. 585 1521–1528 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Di Matteo A., Giovane A., Raiola A., Camardella L., Bonivento D., De Lorenzo G., et al. (2005). Structural basis for the interaction between pectin methylesterase and a specific inhibitor protein. Plant Cell 17 849–858 10.1105/tpc.104.028886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dorokhov Y. L., Komarova T. V., Petrunia I. V., Frolova O. Y., Pozdyshev D. V., Gleba Y. Y. (2012). Airborne signals from a wounded leaf facilitate viral spreading and induce antibacterial resistance in neighboring plants. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002640 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ellinger D., Naumann M., Falter C., Zwikowics C., Jamrow T., Manisseri C., et al. (2013). Elevated early callose deposition results in complete penetration resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 161 1433–1444 10.1104/pp.112.211011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ellis C., Karafyllidis I., Wasternack C., Turner J. G. (2002). The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses. Plant Cell 14 1557–1566 10.1105/tpc.002022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ellis C., Turner J. G. (2001). The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 has constitutively active jasmonate and ethylene signal pathways and enhanced resistance to pathogens. Plant Cell 13 1025–1033 10.1105/tpc.13.5.1025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Eynck C., Seguin-Swartz G., Clarke W. E, Parkin I. A. P. (2012). Monolignol biosynthesis is associated with resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Camelina sativa. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13 887–899 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00798.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Feng J., Wang F., Hughes G. R., Kaminskyj S., Wei Y. D. (2011). An important role for secreted esterase in disease establishment of the wheat powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp tritici. Can. J. Microbiol. 57 211–216 10.1139/W10-120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ferrari S., Galletti R., Pontiggia D., Manfredini C., Lionetti V., Bellincampi D., et al. (2008). Transgenic expression of a fungal endo-polygalacturonase increases plant resistance to pathogens and reduces auxin sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 146 669–681 10.1104/pp.107.109686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferrari S., Savatin D. V., Sicilia F., Gramegna G., Cervone F, De Lorenzo G. (2013). Oligogalacturonides: plant damage-associated molecular patterns and regulators of growth and development. Front. Plant Sci. 4:49 10.3389/fpls.2013.00049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferrari S., Sella L., Janni M., Favaron F, D’Ovidio R. (2012). Transgenic expression of polygalacturonase–inhibiting proteins in Arabidopsis and wheat increases resistance to the flower pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Plant Biol. (Stuttg.) 14 31–38 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00449.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Flors V., Leyva M. D., Vicedo B., Finiti I., Real M. D., Garcia-Agustin P., et al. (2007). Absence of the endo-beta-1,4-glucanases Cel1 and Cel2 reduces susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant J. 52 1027–1040 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03299.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Flors V., Ton J., van Doorn R., Jakab G., Garcia-Agustin P., Mauch-Mani B. (2008). Interplay between JA, SA and ABA signalling during basal and induced resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and Alternaria brassicicola. Plant J. 54 81–92 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03397.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gallego-Giraldo L., Jikumaru Y., Kamiya Y., Tang Y. H., Dixon R. A. (2011). Selective lignin downregulation leads to constitutive defense response expression in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). New Phytol. 190 627–639 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03621.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Galletti R., Denoux C., Gambetta S., Dewdney J., Ausubel F. M., De Lorenzo G., et al. (2008). The AtrbohD-mediated oxidative burst elicited by oligogalacturonides in Arabidopsis is dispensable for the activation of defense responses effective against Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 148 1695–1706 10.1104/pp.108.127845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gille S., Pauly M. (2012). O-acetylation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Front. Plant Sci. 3:12 10.3389/fpls.2012.00012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Giraldo M. C., Valent B. (2013). Filamentous plant pathogen effectors in action. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11 800–814 10.1038/nrmicro3119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hamann T. (2012). Plant cell wall integrity maintenance as an essential component of biotic stress response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 3:77 10.3389/fpls.2012.00077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hauck P., Thilmony R., He S. Y. (2003). A Pseudomonas syringae type III effector suppresses cell wall-based extracellular defense in susceptible Arabidopsis plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 8577–8582 10.1073/pnas.1431173100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hematy K., Sado P. E., Van Tuinen A., Rochange S., Desnos T., Balzergue S., et al. (2007). A receptor-like kinase mediates the response of Arabidopsis cells to the inhibition of cellulose synthesis. Curr. Biol. 17 922–931 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Herbert C., O’Connell R., Gaulin E., Salesses V., Esquerre-Tugaye M. T., Dumas B. (2004). Production of a cell wall-associated endopolygalacturonase by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum and pectin degradation during bean infection. Fungal Genet. Biol. 41 140–147 10.1016/j.fgb.2003.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hernandez-Blanco C., Feng D. X., Hu J., Sanchez-Vallet A., Deslandes L., Llorente F., et al. (2007). Impairment of cellulose synthases required for Arabidopsis secondary cell wall formation enhances disease resistance. Plant Cell 19 890–903 10.1105/tpc.106.048058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hewezi T., Howe P., Maier T. R., Hussey R. S., Mitchum M. G., Davis E. L., et al. (2008). Cellulose binding protein from the parasitic nematode Heterodera schachtii interacts with Arabidopsis pectin methylesterase: cooperative cell wall modification during parasitism. Plant Cell 20 3080–3093 10.1105/tpc.108.063065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hok S., Attard A., Keller H. (2010). Getting the most from the host: how pathogens force plants to cooperate in disease. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 23 1253–1259 10.1094/MPMI-04-10-0103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jacobs A. K., Lipka V., Burton R. A., Panstruga R., Strizhov N., Schulze-Lefert P., et al. (2003). An Arabidopsis callose synthase, GSL5, is required for wound and papillary callose formation. Plant Cell 15 2503–2513 10.1105/tpc.016097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Juge N. (2006). Plant protein inhibitors of cell wall degrading enzymes. Trends Plant Sci. 11 359–367 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. King B. C., Waxman K. D., Nenni N. V., Walker L. P., Bergstrom G. C., Gibson D. M. (2011). Arsenal of plant cell wall degrading enzymes reflects host preference among plant pathogenic fungi. Biotechnol. Biofuels 4:4 10.1186/1754-6834-4-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Komarova T. V., Sheshukova E. V., Dorokhov Y. L. (2014). Cell wall methanol as a signal in plant immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 5:101 10.3389/fpls.2014.00101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Laluk K., Mengiste T. (2010). Necrotroph attacks on plants: wanton destruction or covert extortion? Arabidopsis Book 8:e0136 10.1199/tab.0136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lionetti V., Cervone F., Bellincampi D. (2012). Methyl esterification of pectin plays a role during plant–pathogen interactions and affects plant resistance to diseases. J. Plant Physiol. 169 1623–1630 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lionetti V., Raiola A., Camardella L., Giovane A., Obel N., Pauly M., et al. (2007). Overexpression of pectin methylesterase inhibitors in Arabidopsis restricts fungal infection by Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 143 1871–1880 10.1104/pp.106.090803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lionetti V., Raiola A., Cervone F., Bellincampi D. (2013). Transgenic expression of pectin methylesterase inhibitors limits tobamovirus spread in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15 265–274 10.1111/mpp.12090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Llorente F., Alonso-Blanco C., Sanchez-Rodriguez C., Jorda L., Molina A. (2005). ERECTA receptor-like kinase and heterotrimeric G protein from Arabidopsis are required for resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina. Plant J. 43 165–180 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02440.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Luna E., Pastor V., Robert J., Flors V., Mauch-Mani B., Ton J. (2011). Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense response. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24 183–193 10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Manabe Y., Nafisi M., Verhertbruggen Y., Orfila C., Gille S., Rautengarten C., et al. (2011). Loss-of-function mutation of reduced wall acetylation2 in Arabidopsis leads to reduced cell wall acetylation and increased resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 155 1068–1078 10.1104/pp.110.168989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mattei B., Raiola A., Caprari C., Federici L., Bellincampi D., De Lorenzo G., et al. (2002) “Studies on plant inhibitors of pectin modifying enzymes: polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) and pectin methylesterase inhibitor (PMEI),” in Carbohydrate Bioengineering Interdisciplinary approaches edsTeeri T. T., Svensson B., Gilbert H. J., Feizi T. (CambridgeRoyal Society of Chemistry; ) 160–167 [Google Scholar]
  67. Moscetti I., Tundo S., Janni M., Sella L., Gazzetti K., Tauzin A., et al. (2013). Constitutive expression of the xylanase inhibitor TAXI-III delays fusarium head blight symptoms in durum wheat transgenic plants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26 1464–1472 10.1094/MPMI-04-13-0121-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Noda J., Brito N, González C. (2010). The Botrytis cinerea xylanase Xyn11A contributes to virulence with its necrotizing activity, not with its catalytic activity. BMC Plant Biol. 10 1–15 10.1186/1471-2229-10-38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. O’Brien J. A., Daudi A., Butt V. S., Bolwell G. P. (2012). Reactive oxygen species and their role in plant defence and cell wall metabolism. Planta 236 765–779 10.1007/s00425-012-1696-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Passardi F., Penel C., Dunand C. (2004). Performing the paradoxical: how plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 9 534–540 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pogorelko G., Lionetti V., Bellincampi D., Zabotina O. (2013a). Cell wall integrity: Targeted post–synthetic modifications to reveal its role in plant growth and defense against pathogens. Plant Signal. Behav. 8 1–8 10.4161/psb.25435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pogorelko G., Lionetti V., Fursova O., Sundaram R. M., Qi M. S., Whitham S. A., et al. (2013b). Arabidopsis and Brachypodium distachyon transgenic plants expressing Aspergillus nidulans acetylesterases have decreased degree of polysaccharide acetylation and increased resistance to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 162 9–23 10.1104/pp.113.214460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Prins T. W., Tudzynski P., Von Tiedemann A., Tudzynski B., ten Have A., Hansen M. E., et al. (2000). “Infection strategies of Botrytis cinerea and related necrotrophic pathogens,” in Fungal Pathology ed.Kronstad J. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; ) 33–64 10.1007/978-94-015-9546-9_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Raiola A., Camardella L., Giovane A., Mattei B., De Lorenzo G., Cervone F., et al. (2004). Two Arabidopsis thaliana genes encode functional pectin methylesterase inhibitors. FEBS Lett. 557 199–203 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01491-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Raiola A., Lionetti V., Elmaghraby I., Immerzeel P., Mellerowicz E. J., Salvi G., et al. (2011). Pectin methylesterase is induced in Arabidopsis upon infection and is necessary for a successful colonization by necrotrophic pathogens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24 432–440 10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ramirez V., Agorio A., Coego A., Garcia-Andrade J., Hernandez M. J., Balaguer B., et al. (2011). MYB46 modulates disease susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155 1920–1935 10.1104/pp.110.171843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Reca I. B., Lionetti V., Camardella L., D’Avino R., Giardina T., Cervone F., et al. (2012). A functional pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (SolyPMEI) is expressed during tomato fruit ripening and interacts with PME-1. Plant Mol. Biol. 79 429–442 10.1007/s11103-012-9921-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rocchi V., Janni M., Bellincampi D., Giardina T, D’Ovidio R. (2011). Intron retention regulates the expression of pectin methylesterase inhibitor (Pmei) genes during wheat growth and development. Plant Biol. 14 365–373 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00508.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ron M., Avni A. (2004). The receptor for the fungal elicitor ethylene-inducing xylanase is a member of a resistance-like gene family in tomato. Plant Cell 16 1604–1615 10.1105/tpc.022475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sanchez-Rodriguez C., Estevez J. M., Llorente F., Hernandez-Blanco C., Jorda L., Pagan I., et al. (2009). The ERECTA receptor-like kinase regulates cell wall-mediated resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 22 953–963 10.1094/MPMI-22-8-0953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sattler S. E., Funnell-Harris D. L. (2013). Modifying lignin to improve bioenergy feedstocks: strengthening the barrier against pathogens? Front. Plant Sci. 4:70 10.3389/fpls.2013.00070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sella L., Gazzetti K., Faoro F., Odorizzi S., D’Ovidio R., Schafer W., et al. (2013). A Fusarium graminearum xylanase expressed during wheat infection is a necrotizing factor but is not essential for virulence. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 64 1–10 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Spadoni S., Zabotina O., Di Matteo A., Mikkelsen J. D., Cervone F., DL G., et al. (2006). Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) interacts with pectin through a binding site formed by four clustered residues of arginine and lysine. Plant Physiol. 141 557–564 10.1104/pp.106.076950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Taurino M., Abelenda J. A., Rio-Alvarez I., Navarro C., Vicedo B., Farmaki T., et al. (2014). Jasmonate-dependent modifications of the pectin matrix during potato development function as a defense mechanism targeted by Dickeya dadantii virulence factors. Plant J. 77 418–429 10.1111/tpj.12393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ton J., Mauch-Mani B. (2004). Beta-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. Plant J. 38 119–130 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02028.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Udatha D. B. R. K., Mapelli V., Panagiotou G., Olsson L. (2012). Common and distant structural characteristics of feruloyl esterase families from Aspergillus oryzae. PLoS ONE 7:e39473 10.1371/journal.pone.0039473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Underwood W. (2012). The plant cell wall: a dynamic barrier against pathogen invasion. Front. Plant Sci. 3:85 10.3389/fpls.2012.00085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Vanholme B., De Meutter J., Tytgat T., Van Montagu M., Coomans A., Gheysen G. (2004). Secretions of plant-parasitic nematodes: a molecular update. Gene 332 13–27 10.1016/j.gene.2004.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Vogel J. P., Raab T. K., Schiff C., Somerville S. C. (2002). PMR6, a pectate lyase-like gene required for powdery mildew susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14 2095–2106 10.1105/tpc.003509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Vogel J. P., Raab T. K., Somerville C. R., Somerville S. C. (2004). Mutations in PMR5 result in powdery mildew resistance and altered cell wall composition. Plant J. 40 968–978 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02264.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Voigt C. A. (2014). Callose-mediated resistance to pathogenic intruders in plant defense-related papillae. Front. Plant Sci. 5:168 10.3389/fpls.2014.00168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Volpi C., Janni M., Lionetti V., Bellincampi D., Favaron F, D’Ovidio R. (2011). The ectopic expression of a pectin methyl esterase inhibitor increases pectin methyl esterification and limits fungal diseases in wheat. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24 1012–1019 10.1094/MPMI-01-11-0021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wieczorek K., Golecki B., Gerdes L., Heinen P., Szakasits D., Durachko D. M., et al. (2006). Expansins are involved in the formation of nematode-induced syncytia in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 48 98–112 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02856.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wieczorek K., Hofmann J., Blochl A., Szakasits D., Bohlmann H, Grundler F. M. W. (2008). Arabidopsis endo-1,4-beta-glucanases are involved in the formation of root syncytia induced by Heterodera schachtii. Plant J. 53 336–351 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03340.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Williamson V. M., Kumar A. (2006). Nematode resistance in plants: the battle underground. Trends Genet. 22 396–403 10.1016/j.tig.2006.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wilson R. A., Talbot N. J. (2009). Under pressure: investigating the biology of plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7 185–195 10.1038/nrmicro2032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Xu L., Zhu L. F., Tu L. L., Liu L. L., Yuan D. J., Jin L., et al. (2011). Lignin metabolism has a central role in the resistance of cotton to the wilt fungus Verticillium dahliae as revealed by RNA-Seq-dependent transcriptional analysis and histochemistry. J. Exp. Bot. 62 5607–5621 10.1093/jxb/err245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang L., Kars I., Essenstam B., Liebrand T. W., Wagemakers L., Elberse J., et al. (2014). Fungal endopolygalacturonases are recognized as microbe-associated molecular patterns by the Arabidopsis receptor-like protein responsiveness to Botrytis polygalacturonases1. Plant Physiol. 164 352–364 10.1104/pp.113.230698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhao Z. T., Liu H. Q., Wang C. F., Xu J. R. (2013). Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics 14:274 10.1186/1471-2164-14-274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhong R., Richardson E. A., Ye Z. H. (2007). The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19 2776–2792 10.1105/tpc.107.053678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES