Lack of prognostic significance of adiponectin immunohistochemical expression in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract

Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) – which lack the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) – have no established markers that can be used for prognostic stratification. As adiponectin has been previously implicated in a more aggressive phenotype of primary breast cancer, we explored the relation between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and prognosis in TNBCs.

Material and methods

Immunohistochemical staining for adiponectin was performed in 38 TNBC patients. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures.

Results

Of the 38 TNBC patients, 18 (47%) had negative and 20 (53%) positive adiponectin immunohistochemical expression. We did not find any significant association between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and the baseline characteristics. In addition, there were no associations between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and prognosis.

Conclusions

Although our results suggest that adiponectin immunohistochemical expression is not of prognostic significance in TNBCs, further studies are warranted to determine the role of this adipokine in breast cancer biology.

Introduction

Basal-like breast cancers negative for the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) amplification are known as triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Triple-negative breast cancers are rare (15–20% of all breast cancers) [1–3] and tend to behave aggressively [4]. Triple-negative breast cancers are not only characterized by particularly poor outcomes [5, 6] but they are also refractory to currently available targeted therapy (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, trastuzumab) used to treat other breast cancers [7]. Because targeted treatment of TNBCs remains a major challenge, chemotherapy remains the only systemic therapy currently available for TNBCs [8]. However, disappointing outcomes of standard chemotherapy with TNBCs [1–3] might be related to poor efficacy of standard chemotherapy regimens in unselected patients [7]. Future research strategies in TNBCs should prioritize the identification of potential biomarkers significantly associated with prognosis [9]. The individualization of patient treatment through biomarker-based risk stratification may help to improve outcomes by maximizing efficacy whilst lowering toxicity [10, 11].

Adiponectin is the most abundant adipokine secreted from adipose tissue, and its synthesis is reduced in obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes [12, 13]. Besides metabolic derangements, several lines of evidence have suggested a potential role of adiponectin in the biology of breast cancer, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and insulin regulation [14–16]. Adiponectin has been suggested to exert anti-carcinogenic effects in mammary cancer [15]. However, based on existing immunohistochemical data in patients with primary breast cancer, patients with invasive carcinoma have higher positive rates of adiponectin expression compared with patients with ductal carcinoma in situ [16]. Interestingly, high adiponectin expression was significantly correlated with smaller tumor size [16]. Because there are crosstalks between obesity, the metabolic syndrome, adiponectin and breast tumorigenesis [3], the study of adiponectin in relation to TNBCs seemed worthy of investigation. In addition, adiponectin has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of human breast cancer cell lines [17–20]. Unfortunately, no information is currently available on the association between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and prognosis in patients with TNBCs.

Because of the lack of established prognostic markers in TNBCs, in this study we sought to investigate the prognostic significance of adiponectin immunohistochemical expression with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in a group of homogeneously treated TNBC patients. In the present report, immunohistochemistry was used because several previous studies have shown the prognostic utility of immunohistochemical markers in several different malignancies and disease conditions [21–23].

Material and methods

Patients with TNBCs were prospectively enrolled in the Department of Oncology at Uludag University Medical Center, Bursa, Turkey. Estrogen receptor status and progesterone receptor status were taken as positive if more than 10% of tumor cells showed staining. Immunohistochemical score of 3+ or fluorescence in situ hybridization+ for HER2 was accepted as HER2 positivity [24]. We prospectively identified a total of 38 patients with TNBCs who underwent surgery between January 2004 and September 2011. In all participants, the expression of ER, PR, and HER-2 was immunohistochemically negative in paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. None of these cancer patients received treatment prior to surgery. The patients underwent complete or partial mastectomies with fully resected axillary dissections. Patients received anthracycline- and taxane-containing chemotherapy if the tumor was node positive.

The clinicopathological characteristics such as menopausal state, age, and tumor invasiveness were evaluated based on pathological reports and medical records. Prognostic factors including tumor size, nodal status, and histological grade were evaluated in all participants. Lesion staging was assessed according to the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual for breast cancer. Tumor necrosis was defined as the presence of necrosis of any dimension in a section of invasive cancer. Histologic grading was performed using the criteria of Bloom and Richardson [25]. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review committee of the Uludag University Medical Center, Bursa, Turkey. All patients gave written consent.

Adiponectin immunohistochemical expression

Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue as previously described, with slight modifications. Adiponectin expression levels were analyzed in keeping with previous methodology by an expert pathologist who was blinded to the patient's clinical records [16]. The staining was scored as 0 if no cancer cells were reactive, 1 if staining was weakly positive in < 2/3 of cancer cells, or strongly positive in < 1/3 of cancer cells, and 2 if staining was weakly positive in > 2/3 of cancer cells, or strongly positive in > 1/3 of cancer cells. Finally, adiponectin immunohistochemical staining in breast cancer tissue of TNBCs was classified as negative (score 0) or positive (score 1 and 2; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Negative (A) and positive (B) immunostaining of adiponectin in triple-negative breast cancer specimens; magnification × 100

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated by using GraphPad StatMate version 2.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Our study had 95% power to detect a hazard ratio of death of 0.310 with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 (two-tailed) between patients with positive (vs. negative) adiponectin immunohistochemical expression. Variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation, medians (lower quartile-upper quartile) or as numbers (percentages) if categorical. Correlations were tested using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Disease-free survival was defined as freedom from breast cancer recurrence. Overall survival was defined as freedom from breast cancer death or other causes of death. We assessed the association of each risk factor with DFS and OS by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The multivariable Cox model included all the demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics of the study participants. The appropriateness of the proportional hazards assumption was verified using graphical methods and tested as per Grambsch and Therneau [26]. The assumption of linearity for the Cox models was examined through visual inspection, and no violation was found. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with the estimated regression coefficients and their standard errors in the Cox models. Cumulative survival rates of breast cancer cases were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences of cumulative survival were assessed using the log-rank method. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 14.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-tailed P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The main characteristics of the TNBC patients at baseline are shown in Table 1. Of the 38 study participants, 34 had invasive ductal carcinoma, 2 metaplastic carcinoma, and the remaining 2 other forms of carcinoma. The axillary lymph node status was as follows: pN0 in 19 patients, pN1 in 12 patients, pN2 in 5 patients, and pN3 in 2 patients. Three patients were carriers of mutations in BRCA1/2. Nineteen patients (50%) underwent total and 19 (50%) partial mastectomies. Besides chemotherapy, 26 patients (68%) received radiotherapy. The patients were followed up for a median of 30 months (maximum = 110 months).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the patient population (n = 38)

Age (years)	50 ±11
Postmenopausal status	17 (48%)
Presence of necrosis	21 (55%)
Tumor size  < 2 cm  2–5 cm  > 5 cm	7 (18%) 28 (74%) 3 (8%)
Tumor grade  1  2  3	5 (13%) 10 (26%) 23 (61%)
Tumor stage  1  2  3	4 (11%) 24 (63%) 10 (26%)

Data are means ± standard deviation or number of patients (%).

Adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and prognosis

Of the 38 TNBC patients, 18 (47%) had negative and 20 (53%) positive adiponectin immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer specimens. We did not find any significant association between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and the baseline characteristics of the study participants, including age, postmenopausal status, the presence of necrosis, tumor size, grade, and stage (Table 2).

Table 2.

Correlation analysis of adiponectin immunohistochemical expression with the general characteristics of TNBC patients

Parameter	Spearman's correlation coefficient	P-value
Age	–0.14	0.38
Postmenopausal status	0.27	0.10
Presence of necrosis	–0.19	0.21
Tumor size	–0.08	0.62
Tumor grade	–0.22	0.15
Tumor stage	–0.26	0.09

The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the study participants was 24 months (17–40 months), whereas the median OS was 29 months (20–48 months). Categorization of the patient population according to adiponectin immunohistochemical expression did not reveal any statistically significant difference in terms of either OS (p = 0.90) or DFS (p = 0.27, Fig. 2). The results of multivariable Cox regression analysis (Table 3) indicated that tumor grade and axillary lymph node status were the two main prognostic independent predictors in our TNBC series.

Fig. 2.

Kaplan-Meier plots for disease-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) according to adiponectin immunohistochemical expression

Table 3.

Predictors of disease-free survival and overall survival (Cox regression analysis) in TNBC patients

Variable	Disease-free survival				Overall survival
	univariable		multivariable		univariable		multivariable
	HR (95% CI)	p	HR (95% CI)	p	HR (95% CI)	p	HR (95% CI)	p
Age	1.07 (0.98–1.18)	0.21	1.09 (0.94–1.19)	0.45	1.09 (0.94–1.14)	0.43	1.10 (0.93–1.23)	0.57
Postmenopausal status	2.18(0.94–5.07)	0.11	2.05 (0.90–4.78)	0.38	3.33 (0.78–8.60)	0.57	2.95 (0.51–6.35)	0.65
Presence of necrosis	1.04 (0.91–1.17)	0.45	1.07 (0.93–1.28)	0.32	1.00 (0.94–1.07)	0.99	1.09 (0.90–1.19)	0.84
Tumor size	0.78 (0.31–1.97)	0.51	0.85 (0.42–2.15)	0.69	1.32 (0.55–3.85)	0.34	1.42 (0.50–3.79)	0.37
Tumor grade	3.22 (1.75–7.44)	0.007	2.71 (1.02–7.89)	0.03	1.48 (1.11–3.60)	0.01	1.24 (1.03–2.42)	0.04
Tumor stage	1.94 (0.96–2.89)	0.39	2.12 (0.93–2.97)	0.44	1.97 (0.90–2.99)	0.24	2.12 (0.89–3.22)	0.45
Axillary lymph node status	3.80(1.57–9.18)	0.003	3.93 (1.34–7.14)	0.01	4.28 (1.11–12.35)	0.02	4.55 (1.02–11.77)	0.05
BRCA1/2 mutations	1.13 (0.92–1.58)	0.29	1.11 (0.94–1.66)	0.27	1.27 (0.85–1.62)	0.71	1.39 (0.81–1.85)	0.84
Type of mastectomy	0.79 (0.69–1.11)	0.68	0.73 (0.55–1.89)	0.75	0.94 (0.61-1.44)	0.55	1.09 (0.69–1.67)	0.68
Adiponectin +	1.68 (0.68–2.70)	0.34	1.32 (0.76–2.39)	0.41	1.25 (0.67–3.14)	0.89	1.33 (0.59–3.67)	0.93

HR – hazard ratio

Discussion

The significance of adiponectin immunohistochemical expression in patients with breast cancer has recently been given its first epidemiological support. In this regard, Jeong et al. [16] have shown that high adiponectin expression in tissue specimens may be associated with breast cancer invasiveness. The present study is the first prospective survey addressing the association between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and prognosis in a series of patients with TNBCs. The prognosis of women with TNBCs is significantly poor compared to women with other forms of breast cancer [1–3]. Therefore, there is an urgent need of biomarker tools to improve the prognostic stratification of this high-risk group [8, 9]. Unfortunately, our data do not support an association of the adiponectin immunohistochemical expression with either PFS or OS in patients with TNBCs. In contrast, in our cohort of TNBCs we found that tumor grade and axillary lymph node status were the only two variables significantly associated with prognosis. The results on tumor grade were in keeping with previous studies analyzing TNBC cohorts [9]. In particular, a large study of 6,370 TNBC patients produced similar results in terms of histological grade [27]. Recent years have also witnessed increased awareness of the prognostic significance of lymph node status to stratify survival outcomes in TNBCs [28]. Although putatively less prominent lymph node involvement in TNBCs has been reported, it is clear from our and previous data that TNBC patients with axillary lymph node involvement experience a significant decrease in their outcome compared with those without nodal spread [28].

Adiponectin is a fat-derived hormone whose reduction plays central roles in obesity-linked diseases [29]. The deregulation of adiponectin in the setting of obesity and its impact on cancer progression and metastasis has been actively investigated in recent years due to the pleiotropic actions of this molecule. Notably, adiponectin has been linked to the metabolic syndrome, which in turn has been recently associated with TNBCs [3, 13, 28]. The potential role of adiponectin in TNBCs is a topic of considerable interest because of the lack of any established biomarkers in this clinical entity [1–3]. However, we failed to detect a prognostic significance on outcomes in this group of patients, suggesting that adiponectin is not useful in risk stratification of TNBCs. Our negative results do not appear to result from lack of power of our study as shown by our sample size calculation. Moreover, we did not identify any significant association between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and the baseline characteristics of the study participants, including age, postmenopausal status, the presence of necrosis, tumor size, grade, and stage. These data seem to suggest that adiponectin immunohistochemical expression is not directly correlated with the clinicopathological characteristics of TNBCs. In any case, further studies are warranted to determine the role of adiponectin in breast cancer biology.

Some limitations of our study merit consideration. First, our population consisted exclusively of Turkish subjects without ethnic diversity. Therefore, extrapolation of any conclusions from the present investigation may be incorrect and future studies in different clinical cohorts are needed to confirm and expand our findings. Second, we did not measure circulating adiponectin levels in plasma because of financial constraints. Therefore, we cannot exclude that plasma adiponectin levels may have a role in the risk assessment of TNBC patients. Future studies are needed to shed more light on this important issue. Notably, low levels of circulating adiponectin have been reported in women with endometrial cancer, in men with prostate cancer, and in patients suffering from colorectal cancer [29]. Importantly, Duggan et al. [30] recently reported an association between reduced levels of adiponectin and increased breast cancer mortality in breast cancer survivors.

In summary, we did not find any significant association between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and baseline characteristics of TNBC patients. In addition, there were no associations between adiponectin immunohistochemical expression and prognosis. Although our results suggest that adiponectin expression in cancer specimens is not of prognostic significance for TNBCs, further studies are warranted to determine the future potential of this molecular approach in primary breast cancer.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.