Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2014 May 29;2(3):e00530-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00530-14

Genome Sequence of the Native Apiculate Wine Yeast Hanseniaspora vineae T02/19AF

Facundo M Giorello a,b,a,b, Luisa Berná c, Gonzalo Greif c, Laura Camesasca d, Valentina Salzman e, Karina Medina b, Carlos Robello c,f,c,f, Carina Gaggero d, Pablo S Aguilar e, Francisco Carrau b,
PMCID: PMC4038898  PMID: 24874663

Abstract

The use of novel yeast strains for winemaking improves quality and provides variety including subtle characteristic differences in fine wines. Here we report the first genome of a yeast strain native to Uruguay, Hanseniaspora vineae T02/19AF, which has been shown to positively contribute to aroma and wine quality.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Even though Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces most of the ethanol in wine, apiculate yeasts of the genus Hanseniaspora are the main species present on grapes and they play a significant role at the beginning of fermentation (13). The genus Hanseniaspora includes at least six species associated in two groups (4): valbyensis, guilliermondii, uvarum and vineae, osmophila, occidentalis. We have shown (5) that wines produced by co-fermentation of H. vineae and S. cerevisiae consistently exhibit more intense flavors and complexity and are significantly more full-bodied than wines produced by S. cerevisiae. Indeed, the co-fermentation strategy with Hanseniaspora species provided significant increases in glycerol and acetate ester flavor compounds and relative decreases in higher alcohols and fatty acids which correlates with the wine differences found between these alternative fermentation procedures (5). Thus, it will be of particular interest to characterize the genes differentially associated with these processes. We present the genome of H. vineae T02/19AF in order to contribute to a better understanding of its “flavor phenotype.”

H. vineae T02/19AF was isolated from Tannat wine fermentation, the typical red grape of Uruguay (6). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx platform and generated 13,302,566 paired-end reads (2×100 cycles) representing an average coverage of 212-fold. Reads were filtered and trimmed with QC Toolkit (7), and redundancies were removed using Trinity in silico normalization (8). The processed reads were then assembled using MaSuRCA (9) (cgwErrorRate=0.15, insert size=900). Based on reciprocal BLASTn (10), redundant contigs (those included in a bigger read) were removed. A final assembly of 277 contigs (>500 pb) was obtained, which formed 124 scaffolds with a total length of 11,401,444 bp. The genome has an N50 of ~261 kb with an average G+C content of 37%, very similar to S. cerevisiae (11, 12).

A total of 4,733 putative open reading frames (ORFs) >100 nucleotides were predicted using Augustus (13) trained with S. cerevisiae. Automatic gene annotation using BLASTp (10) revealed that 4,206 ORFs (89%) are homologous to sequences of the NCBI’s non-redundant protein database from which 3,879 had at least one Pfam domain, indicating the high reliability of the predictions. Moreover, 4,061 predictions presented homology with 3,849 S. cerevisiae S288C strain distinct genes.

One hundred twenty eight genes associated with fermentation, such as those participating in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, citrate cycle, pentose pathway, steroid biosynthesis, fatty acid degradation, and fatty acid biosynthesis pathways (14), from KEGG (15) were analyzed. Despite the great sequence divergence observed between H. vineae and S. cerevisiae, 87 of those genes (68%) were found through BLASTp in the genome of H. vineae T02/19AF. The accurate analysis of these genes will help further the understanding of the “flavor phenotype” of this and other yeast species. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a Saccharomycodaceae yeast family genome.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. JFAV00000000. The version described in this paper is version JFAV02000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by CSIC Group Project 656, Sector Productivo Project 602 of University of the Republic (Udelar), Uruguay, and the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (Uruguay) grants DCI-ALA/2011/023-502 “Contrato de apoyo a las políticas de innovación y cohesión territorial” and FMV 2011-6956 “Hanseniaspora vineae.”

We thank the Department of Ecology and Evolution (Udelar) for computational support.

Footnotes

Citation Giorello FM, Berná L, Greif G, Camesasca L, Salzman V, Medina K, Robello C, Gaggero C, Aguilar PS, Carrau F. 2014. Genome sequence of the native apiculate wine yeast Hanseniaspora vineae T02/19AF. Genome Announc. 2(3):e00530-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00530-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fleet GH. 2003. Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 86:11–22. 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00245-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Jolly NP, Varela C, Pretorius IS. 2014. Not your ordinary yeast: non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered. FEMS Yeast Res. 14:215–237. 10.1111/1567-1364.12111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke Pa, Pretorius IS. 2005. Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 11:139–173. 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kurtzman CP. 2011. Discussion of teleomorphic and anamorphic ascomycetous yeasts and yeast-like taxa, p 293–307 In Fell JW, Kurtzman CP, Boekhout T. (ed), The yeasts, a taxonomic study. Elsevier, London, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Medina K, Boido E, Fariña L, Gioia O, Gomez ME, Barquet M, Gaggero C, Dellacassa E, Carrau F. 2013. Increased flavour diversity of Chardonnay wines by spontaneous fermentation and co-fermentation with Hanseniaspora vineae. Food Chem. 141:2513–2521. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Da Silva C, Zamperin G, Ferrarini A, Minio A, Dal Molin A, Venturini L, Buson G, Tononi P, Avanzato C, Zago E, Boido E, Dellacassa E, Gaggero C, Pezzotti M, Carrau F, Delledonne M. 2013. The high polyphenol content of grapevine cultivar Tannat berries is conferred primarily by genes that are not shared with the reference genome. Plant Cell 25:4777–4788. 10.1105/tpc.113.118810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Patel RK, Jain M. 2012. NGS QC Toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One 7:e30619. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, Macmanes MD, Ott M, Orvis J, Pochet N, Strozzi F, Weeks N, Westerman R, William T, Dewey CN, Henschel R, Leduc RD, Friedman N, Regev A. 2013. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8:1494–1512. 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zimin AV, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA. 2013. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Meyer SA, Phaff HJ. 1969. Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition in yeasts. J. Bacteriol. 97:52–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wendland J, Walther A. 2011. Genome evolution in the Eremothecium clade of the Saccharomyces complex revealed by comparative genomics. G3 (Bethesda) 1:539–548. 10.1534/g3.111.001032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. 2008. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24:637–644. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Backhus LE, DeRisi J, Bisson LF. 2001. Functional genomic analysis of a commercial wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under differing nitrogen conditions. FEMS Yeast Res. 1:111–125. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2001.tb00022.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M. 1999. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:29–34. 10.1093/nar/27.20.e29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES