Abstract
Petroleum products play a major role in fueling the economy of the world but the pollution they create has become a critical issue. Understanding the diversity present in pipeline muck will help with the exploration of new microbial strains with better hydrocarbon degrading capacities for bioremediation of polluted sites. This study provides an analysis of petroleum muck using next generation sequencing.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Petroleum is considered to be a principal source of energy and petroleum products are used in a wide variety of industries such as agriculture, plastics, tires, pharmaceuticals, dyes, detergents, and others. However, the accidental release of petroleum leads to widespread pollution of soil and aquifers, stimulating the need for an upgrade in bioremediation processes. Metagenomic studies of petroleum associated samples explore both culturable and unculturable microbial diversity that may play an important role in bioremediation of sites contaminated due to oil spills. Previously reported data describe the microbial diversity of oil contaminated sites using metagenomic approaches (1–3). However, no attempt has been made to study the microbial population of petroleum pipelines. Such sites assume greater importance than oil contaminated sites because pipelines will contain only microorganisms that are resistant or able to degrade hydrocarbons while an indigenous microbial population will also be present in oil contaminated sites. This study is aimed toward unravelling the taxonomic and functional diversity of microorganisms present in muck samples. The petroleum muck sample used here was kindly provided by the Indian Oil Corporation, Kandla.
The metagenomic study was based on next generation sequencing using the Ion Torrent platform. To our knowledge, this is the first report which describes a next generation sequencing based study of microbial diversity from petroleum pipelines. Metagenomic DNA extraction was carried out using the Power Soil DNA Isolation kit (MoBioLaboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed with a high-throughput Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine with the Ion Torrent Server (Torrent Suite, version 3.2) using Ion Express Template 300 chemistry on a 318 chip, quality filtered, then exported in FastQ format. A total of 249 Mb data containing 2,228,423 sequences with an average length of 111 bps was obtained. Metagenomic reads were annotated with metagenome rapid annotation using the Subsystem Technology (MG-RAST) server (http://metagenomics.nmpdr.org/) (4). For contig level analysis, assembly was done with a MetaVelvet 1.13 assembler (5) using a max k-mer length of 51. Assemblies were uploaded to MG-RAST and the Integrated Microbial Genomes database (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/mer) (6). The taxonomic analysis revealed predominance of domain Bacteria (88.90%), followed by Eukaryota (0.06%) and Archaea (0.03%). Sequences affiliated with phylum Proteobacteria (99.09%) were most abundant, with Gammaproteobacteria (51.31%) as the major class and Pseudomonas stutzeri as the most abundant organism. Pseudomonas stutzeri strains are able to metabolize benzoate, cresol, naphthalene, xylene, toluene, and phenol (7). Other sequences belonged to phyla Actinobacteria (0.70%), Firmicutes (0.11%), and 0.75% other phyla. Although sequences were not affiliated with domain Archaea as much as other major phyla, Euryarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, and Crenarchaeota, have developed mechanisms of metal resistance and thus can be used in bioremediation (8, 9).
This study will form a basis for the understanding of indigenous microbial populations existing in petroleum samples which will help in devising isolation strategies for culturable organisms and cloning of better enzymes that may be used in bioremediation of petroleum polluted sites.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
DNA sequences obtained have been deposited at NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession no. SRX314771.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of Gujarat, under Project-151, a joint initiative of Gujarat Biodiversity Gene Bank, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, and the Virtual Institute of Bioinformatics.
We are thankful to Indian Oil Corporation, Kandla, Gujarat, India for providing the muck sample.
Footnotes
Citation Joshi MN, Dhebar SV, Dhebar SV, Bhargava P, Pandit AS, Patel RP, Saxena AK, Bagatharia SB. 2014. Metagenomic approach for understanding microbial population from petroleum muck. Genome Announc. 2(3):e00533-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00533-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Andreote FD, Jiménez DJ, Chaves D, Dias ACF, Luvizotto DM, Dini-Andreote F, Fasanella CC, Lopez MV, Baena S, Taketani RG, de Melo IS. 2012. The microbiome of Brazilian mangrove sediments as revealed by metagenomics. PLoS One 7:e38600. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Viñas M, Sabaté J, Espuny MJ, Solanas AM. 2005. Bacterial community dynamics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation during bioremediation of heavily creosote-contaminated soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:7008–7018. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7008-7018.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kimes NE, Callaghan AV, Aktas DF, Smith WL, Sunner J, Golding B, Drozdowska M, Hazen TC, Suflita JM, Morris PJ. 2013. Metagenomic analysis and metabolite profiling of deep-sea sediments from the Gulf of Mexico following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Front Microbiol. 4:50. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A, Wilkening J, Edwards RA. 2008. The metagenomics RAST server–a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9:386. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Namiki T, Hachiya T, Tanaka H, Sakakibara Y. 2012. Metavelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e155. 10.1093/nar/gks678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Szeto E, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. 2009. The DOE-JGI standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand. Genomic Sci. 1:63–67. 10.4056/sigs.632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lalucat J, Bennasar A, Bosch R, García-Valdés E, Palleroni NJ. 2006. Biology of Pseudomonas stutzeri. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:510–547. 10.1128/MMBR.00047-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Srivastava P, Kowshik M. 2013. Mechanisms of metal resistance and homeostasis in haloarchaea. Archaea 2013:732864. 10.1155/2013/732864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bini E. 2010. Archaeal transformation of metals in the environment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 73:1–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]