Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 1;1(2):204–223. doi: 10.1007/s40501-014-0015-4

Managing Chronic Pain in Patients with Opioid Dependence

Jane Liebschutz 1, Donna Beers 1, Allison Lange 1,2
PMCID: PMC4039557  NIHMSID: NIHMS581235  PMID: 24892008

Introduction

“Pain is Inevitable; Suffering is Optional.” [M. Kathleen Casey].

Pain is a subjective multi-dimensional experience that is influenced by physiological stimuli and the emotional, cultural, environmental and social climate surrounding an individual. Chronic pain, usually defined as lasting 12 weeks or longer, is associated with increased psychological distress, decreased mobility, obesity, decreased physical function, social isolation, financial loss, and development of chronic disability [1]. Individuals with opioid dependence may have increased vulnerabilities that influence their experience of pain, including lowered pain thresholds [2, 3], increased social stress, psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety), financial strain, and decreased coping skills. More than one-third of patients on methadone maintenance therapy have chronic severe pain [4, 5]. In some cases, patients developed opioid addiction after being given opioid medication for the treatment of acute or chronic pain [6].

Since chronic pain lasts for months to years [7], a primary goal of treatment is to manage pain, rather than eliminate pain altogether. This is true in patients with and without addictive diseases, but is particularly important to establish with patients with addiction. Pain is associated with increased odds of opioid misuse in opioid dependent persons [8]. Managing expectations of both clinician and patient is a mainstay of treatment. A second principle is to address the individual symptoms contributing to and resulting from chronic pain and those of importance to the patient. Lastly, self-management of pain symptoms and sequelae should be integrated into all aspects of pain treatment. Very little evidence exists specifically for treating pain in patients with addiction of any type, but principles of pain treatment in the general population are applicable to patients with opioid dependence.

The five pillars of treatment include

  1. Improving psychosocial engagement. Cognitive behavioral therapy as well as other therapies may be helpful for pain [9, 10] but has not been proven to be helpful in opioid dependence [11-13]. Mindfulness- based therapies have been studied for pain management but have shown little efficacy to date [14, 15]. Developing a specific plan for socialization, whether it be participation in regular substance abuse treatment group, 12-step programs or other activity (perhaps with family or friends) is key to keeping the patient engaged. In particular, with pain and disability, finding a way to feel useful and engaged is essential to recovery from chronic pain. Case management or social work referral may help patients identify potential aid for financial or housing stress.

  2. Physical mobility and function. A variety of methods can be used for patients to improve and maintain physical function. Increasing activity can improve mood [16, 17], increase weight loss [18], prevent deconditioning and improve pain related disability [19]. Physical therapy and other modalities (yoga) improve pain outcomes [20-28].

  3. Weight loss in persons with obesity. A combination of diet and exercise for weight loss can improve pain symptoms and function [29].

  4. Engagement with substance use treatment and/or relapse prevention. To treat pain optimally, patients also need to focus on their substance use, including taking accountability for their use. In the experience of the authors, some patients with substance use disorders may focus so much on the pain that they avoid doing the cognitive and emotional work required to recover from substance use problems. Full commitment to substance use disorder treatment is central to success of managing pain.

  5. Medications. Medications can be used to both decrease the pain sensation but also to treat the other symptoms that occur with chronic pain. Medications from different classes of medicine may be synergistic to relieve symptoms. Opioid medications are not recommended for use to treat chronic pain in patients with opioid dependence. The exception would be a patient with terminal cancer, for whom it would be appropriate. Opioid agonist treatment for addiction may have benefits for chronic pain [30]. Opioids are appropriate for acute pain in an inpatient medical setting.

TREATMENT

Diet and lifestyle
  • Weight loss has been shown to decrease disability from osteoarthritis in obese patients in combining results from several trials together [31]. An individual study found that it was the combination of exercise plus diet together that improved function and decreased pain in osteoarthritis whereas diet alone was not effective [32]. Both strength training and aerobic walking have been shown to improve pain and function in osteoarthritis, Class I [33].

  • Self-management is a process by which patients with a chronic illness or disability learn to effectively care for themselves via training, intervention, or skills acquisition. This process has been shown to improve pain, distress, and mood in patients with chronic pain in small randomized trials. Self-management using CBT has been shown to be effective in a randomized trial of 141 adults, improving pain, distress, disability, mood at one month follow up, Class II [34]. Benefits of self-management in patients with chronic neck pain were sustained over a 2 year follow up period [35].

Pharmacologic treatment
  • The treatment aims of pharmacological therapy include reduction of pain, but also reduction of symptoms that accompany chronic pain, such as depression, anxiety, sleep, and muscle spasm. Most medications were developed and tested in populations without active addiction problems, however. Effectiveness in patients with addiction is unknown, except where noted.

  • A multimodal medication regimen combines medications with different underlying mechanisms. Additive analgesia may occur and this approach allows lower doses of each of the drugs in the treatment plan, which lowers the potential for each to produce adverse effects [36]. Further, multimodal analgesia may result in comparable or greater pain relief than can be achieved with any single analgesic [37]. It may also be more effective at treating the co-occurring symptoms that accompany chronic pain and addiction.

  • Patients with substance dependence who are in recovery through an abstinence-based program (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous) may be reluctant to take psychoactive medications, although these programs encourage their members to take medications that have been legitimately prescribed by their physician.


WHO’s Pain Relief Ladder (WHO, 1986)
  • The World Health Organization Pain Relief ladder [38] was developed and promulgated internationally as a cohesive view toward treating cancer pain. It has been also adapted for non-cancer chronic pain, but prescribers should cautiously approach its applicability in patients with co-occurring addiction and pain because opioids are a mainstay of treating severe pain. In general, opioids are not recommended to treat chronic pain in patients with addiction, even if they are in recovery.

  • The analgesic ladder focuses on selecting analgesics on the basis of the intensity of the pain using analgesics from each of the analgesic groups and, to some extent, building on previously effective analgesics.

  • Step 1: Simple analgesics (acetaminophen, NSAIDs)

  • Step 2: Weak opioids

  • Step 3: Strong opioids

  • Adjuvants (anti-seizure medications, muscle relaxants, TCAs, SNRIs, SSRIs). These may be added at any of the above 3 steps.

Simple Analgesics

Acetaminophen has been shown to be better than placebo in patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee with respect to pain control, but not superior to NSAIDs, Class I [39]. However, Acetaminophen can be considered first-line for chronic pain because it has a better side effect profile than NSAIDs, Class I [40].

Acetaminophen:
Standard dosage: 650 mg Q6 hours (Max 2000 mg if cirrhosis or ≥ 3 alcoholic drinks/day)
Contraindications: Patients with liver impairment and those with daily, regular alcohol intake
Main drug interactions: Anticonvulsants, barbiturates, carbamazepine may increase the metabolism of
acetaminophen; isoniazid, prilocaine. Acetaminophen increases the effects of
warfarin with doses > 1.5-2g/day. Acute excessive intake of alcohol can lead to
increased risk of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity.
Main side effects : Occasional skin rash and other allergic reactions. Acute overdose can cause fatal
hepatic injury.
Special points: Well tolerated. Can be combined with other analgesics. Effective analgesic-
antipyretic agent, but its anti-inflammatory activity is weak. When used as part of
multimodal analgesia, can reduce the amount of opioids needed to control pain.
Cost: Low cost

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory (NSAID)

This category of medications includes a number of over-the-counter and prescription options. Doses suggested are prescription level. This list is a sampling of widely used options. For all NSAIDs, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions following aspirin or other NSAIDS is a contraindication to use. In a systematic review of 65 RCTs including 11,237 patients, strong evidence was found to support the efficacy of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors for acute and chronic low back pain, Class I [41]. All NSAIDs were found to have similar efficacy.

Naproxen:
Standard dosage: 500 mg Q12 hours or 500 Q AM plus 250 BID (Max 1000 mg/24 hours)
Contraindications: Full-dose naproxen is not recommended in older adults because of its long half-life
Main drug interactions: Avoid combining NSAIDS. May interact with drugs prescribed for cardiac disease
including anti-hypertensive, anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications.
Main side effects: GI toxicity, renal toxicity, platelet dysfunction.
Special points: First line NSAID.
Cost: Low cost

Ibuprofen:
Standard dosage: 600 mg every 6 hours (Max 2400 mg/24 hours)
Main drug interactions: ACE-inhibitors, aspirin, lithium, warfarin
Main side effects: GI toxicity, renal toxicity, platelet dysfunction
Special points: Second line NSAID. Ibuprofen can interfere with the cardioprotective effect of
aspirin, so it should be taken 30 minutes to 2 hours after aspirin intake or at least 8
hours before. Pregnancy Category C.
Cost: Low cost

Piroxicam:
Standard dosage: 10mg once daily
Contraindications: Avoid full dose in elderly due to its long half-life and risk of GI toxicity
Main drug interactions: ACE-Inhibitors, MAOIs, aspirin, warfarin
Main side effects: High risk of GI toxicity, renal toxicity, platelet dysfunction
Special points: Second line NSAID. Pregnancy Category C
Cost: Moderate cost

Diclofenac:
Standard dosage: 18 or 35 mg ORALLY 3 times daily
Main drug interactions: Concomitant use with other NSAIDS may result in enhanced gastrointestinal
adverse effects (peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding and/or perforation).
Main side effects: Increased liver function test
Special points: Second line NSAID. Pregnancy category C
Cost: High cost

Indomethacin:
Standard dosage: maximum recommended oral or rectal dose is 200 mg/day
Main drug interactions: Concurrent use of other NSAIDs may result in enhanced gastrointestinal adverse
effects (peptic ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding and/or perforation).
Main side effects: Dizziness, headache, GI toxicity, increased liver enzymes, renal toxicity
Special points: Use lowest effective dose for shortest possible duration this is to be used in short
term only.
Cost: Low cost

COX-2 Inhibitors

This subset of NSAID category of medications have less gastrointestinal side effects. Some formulations have been found to increase risk for cardiovascular disease and have been removed from the market. Urticaria or allergic-type reaction to aspirin or other NSAIDS is a contraindication to use. In a randomized controlled trial of 446 patients with chronic low back pain, a COX-2 inhibitor was found to be comparable to NSAIDs for pain relief, Class II [42]. In a systematic review of patients with chronic low back pain, two randomized trials compared COX-2 inhibitors with traditional NSAIDs, and no statistically significant difference was found between the two treatments, Class I [43].

Nabumetone
Standard dosage: Arthritis 1000-2000mg PO daily. May be given once or twice daily. Max dose
2000 mg/day.
Contraindications: Allergy or hypersensitivity to aspirin or NSAIDs.
Main side effects: Edema, pruritus, rash, constipation, diarrhea, headache, tinnitus
Special points: The drug is best taken with food or milk. Patient should not drink alcohol while
taking this drug.
Cost: Moderate cost

Celecoxib
Standard dosage: 200-400 mg daily in two doses.
Contraindications: Asthma, pruritis, rhinorrhea, or other reaction after aspirin or other NSAID. Up to
21% of patients with a hypersensitivity to NSAIDs also have a hypersensitivity to
COX-2 inhibitors [44].
Main drug interactions: Concurrent use of NSAIDs may result in enhanced gastrointestinal toxicity.
Main side effects: Hypertension, diarrhea, headache
Special points: Instruct patients on higher doses (400 mg twice daily) to take drug with food. Lower
doses may be taken with or without food. Tell patient to avoid drinking alcohol and
smoking, as this may increase risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.
Cost: Moderate cost

Muscle Relaxants

Of note, carisoprodol (Soma) is a muscle relaxant that is metabolized to a barbiturate and should not be prescribed for patients with opioid dependence. Cyclobenzaprine is the best studied muscle relaxant. A meta-analysis of 5 RCTs showed that cyclobenzaprine had efficacy for treating pain due to fibromyalgia [45], and later Kroenke et al. found that 21 RCTs show that cyclobenzaprine is effective for pain relief in patients with fibromyalgia [40]. A recent randomized trial of 36 patients showed that low-dose cyclobenzaprine improved pain associated with FM, Class II [46].

Cyclobenzaprine: (Flexeril)
Standard dosage: immediate release: 5 mg TID, may increase to 10 mg TID; extended release: 15 mg
PO daily.
Contraindications: Cardiac conduction disturbances, CHF, hypersensitivity, hyperthyroidism, MI (or
acute recovery period).
Main drug interactions: MAOIs, TCAs, bupropion phenothiazine, clonidine
Main side effects: Dizziness, sedation, dry mouth, orthostatic hypotension.
Special points: Generally well-tolerated but have sedative effects that may be additive to other
centrally-acting drugs, including opioids. Muscle relaxants are not recommended in
older adults as this age group has increased sensitivity to the anticholinergic and
sedating effects of the drugs, and the muscle relaxant effect may contribute to falls
[47].
Cost: Low cost

Anti-Seizure Medications

Anti-seizure medications, in particular gabapentin and pregabalin, are FDA approved to treat neuropathic pain. A Cochrane Review in 2013 found that gabapentin and pregabalin were supported by 2nd tier evidence for the treatment of diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia, Class I [48]. Evidence also supported the use of pregabalin in fibromyalgia for pain [48].

Gabapentin: (Neurontin)
Standard dosage: Titrate up to 900-1200mg TID
Contraindications: Kidney disease, depression, pregnancy.
Main drug interactions: Antacids
Main side effects: Sedation, dizziness, unsteadiness, and nausea.
Special points: Adverse effects usually lessen with time. Reports of abuse exist for gabapentin at
high doses.
Cost: Moderate cost

Pregabalin:(Lyrica)
Standard dosage: 300-450 mg QD, divided into BID doses
Contraindications: Caution in elderly, depressed, renal impairment, heavy alcohol consumption
Main drug interactions: Pioglitazone (Actos) and rosiglitazone (Avandia)
Main side effects: sedation, dizziness, unsteadiness, and nausea
Special points: Adverse effects usually lessen with time. Approved for treatment of fibromyalgia.
Should be considered the first-line drug for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia
and other neuropathies unless a co-morbid depression suggests that a tricyclic
antidepressant should be tried first [49, 50].
Cost: High Cost

Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs)

TCAs have been shown to be more effective in fibromyalgia than other anti-depressants as well as other treatment options [51, 52]. In addition to the two well-studied TCAs listed below, a number of other TCAs are likely to be equally effective.

Amitriptyline: (Elavil)
Standard dosage: Start at 10-25 mg at bedtime; titrate to 100 mg (max 50 mg if taking an SSRI/SNRI)
Contraindications: TCA allergies
 Main drug interactions MAOIs, St. John’s Wort, clonidine. Use with caution with other medications that
cause QTc prolongation
Main side effects: sedation, orthostatic hypotension, urinary retention, and dry mouth.
Special points: Avoid in older adults.
Cost: Low cost

Nortriptyline:(Pamelor)
Standard dosage: Start at 10-25 mg, titrate to 100 mg (max 50 mg if taking an SSRI/SNRI)
Contraindications: TCA allergies
Main drug interactions: Alcohol can increase side effects. Use with caution with other medications that
cause QTc prolongation.
Main side effects: sedation, orthostatic hypotension, and dry mouth
Special points: Try at least 2 TCAs but avoid in older adults (65+ years). It has less hypotension
than Amitriptyline.
Cost: Low cost

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)

Fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram
SSRIs have been used for chronic pain, although have less efficacy than TCAs for fibromyalgia. The beneficial effect on
chronic pain may be more on the co-occurring symptoms, in particular depression, associated with chronic pain rather
than the pain itself. In a trial of 12 weeks of treatment with antidepressant medication (n = 123) or usual care (n = 127), at
12 months patients receiving the intervention had greater reduction in depression and pain, Class I [53].
Standard dosage: Dosing varies based on the SSRI.
Contraindications: hypersensitivity to sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, or citalopram.
Main drug interactions: disulfiram, MAOI within 14 days, pimozide
Main side effects: sexual dysfunction, drowsiness, weight gain, insomnia, anxiety, dizziness,
headache, dry mouth, blurry vision, nausea, rash, tremor, constipation.
Cost: Moderate cost (variable, depending on which medication)

Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs)

This class of medications treats both mood and a variety of other disorders- fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and menstrual syndromes. Duloxetine was found to be effective for treating pain due to fibromyalgia in a recent Cochrane review, Class I [54].

Venlafaxine: (Effexor)
Standard dosage: Start at 37.5 mg and titrate up to effective dose, with max at 225mg QD
Contraindications: Glaucoma, heart disease, HTN, mania, seizure disorders
Main drug interactions: MAOIs, SSRIs St John’s Wort
Main side effects: Dizziness, drowsiness, nausea and vomiting, dry mouth.
Special points: Better adverse event profile than TCAs [55]. Use cautiously in patients with high
CV risk. Should not stop abruptly. Can cause dose-related hypertension, and, if
appropriate, blood pressure (BP) monitoring should be done during initiation of
treatment.
Cost: Low cost (generic available)

Duloxetine (Cymbalta)
Standard dosage: titrate up to 60mg QD
Contraindications: An increase in hepatotoxicity has been linked to the use of duloxetine in individuals
with pre-existing liver disease, suggesting that the drug may aggravate the disease
Main drug interactions: MAOIs, selegiline, tranylcypromine
Main side effects: dizziness, fatigue, and dry mouth.
Special points: FDA-approved for fibromyalgia and diabetic neuropathy. Side effects can be
reduced by starting at 30 mg daily for 1 week and then increasing to 60 mg daily.
Should not be stopped abruptly. Numerous trials have shown efficacy in decreasing
pain due to osteoarthritis [56, 57]. Better adverse event profile than TCAs [55].
Cost: High cost (still on patent)

Dual Mechanism Opioids

These medications have both mu-opioid agonist and nor-epinephrine (+/−) serotonin reuptake inhibitor properties. This may improve inhibitory processes in the mid-brain to decrease pain signals. Both have abuse and addiction potential.

Tramadol:
Standard dosage: 100 mg PO once daily; titrate up by 100 mg every 2-3 days as needed for moderate
pain. For severe pain, 100 mg PO daily, titrate up by 100 mg every 5 days as
needed with a maximum of 300 mg /day.
Contraindications: Hypercapnia, acute or severe bronchial asthma, respiratory depression,
hypersensitivity to opioids.
Main drug interactions: Acute intoxication with alcohol, hypnotics, narcotics, centrally acting analgesics, or
psychotropic drugs (may worsen CNS and respiratory depression).
Main side effects: Flushing, pruritis, constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, insomnia,
somnolence. Rarely, seizure, dyspnea, pancreatitis.
Special points: Patients should be tapered if they are on tramadol chronically.
Cost: Low cost

Tapentadol:
Standard dosage: For severe chronic pain, 50 mg PO extended release q12h. Titrate up by 50 mg q3d,
up to therapeutic range of 100-250 mg PO q12h. Maximum dose of 500 mg/day.
Contraindications: Hypercapnia, bronchial asthma, hypersensitivity to tapentadol, GI obstruction,
respiratory depression.
Main drug interactions: MAOIs, sedatives.
Main side effects: Constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, Headache, somnolence, hypotension, left
bundle branch block, anaphylaxis, seizure, respiratory depression.
Special points: Seizure potential
Cost: Moderate cost

Opioids

Although opioids are a common treatment for chronic pain, they are not recommended for patients with active addiction of any type. They can be cautiously recommended for patients in stable recovery, although even then have to be closely monitor. Use of opioids may become problematic in patients with prior addiction. High quality studies on use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain are not available, and most available trials of opioids for chronic pain are limited by the exclusion of patients with addiction, sponsorship by pharmaceutical industry, small sample sizes, and short duration. A Cochrane review combining the largest trials with 8-13 month follow up found that only 44% of patients treated with opioids experienced a 50% reduction in pain [58]. In certain patients, the underlying pain condition may warrant use of opioids, in which case, they should be under the care of someone with both addiction and pain expertise who has the ability to do close monitoring with pills counts, and urine drug testing.

Two opioids used in the treatment of opioid dependence have potential analgesic properties. A study of patients with addiction on chronic opioid therapy who were randomized to low dose methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone produced moderate analgesia [30].

Methadone:
Standard Dosage: For chronic pain treatment: methadone should be started at very low doses and
increased slowly over weeks. Since the analgesic half-life is 6-8 hours, it should be
given 3-4 times daily. It can be started at 2.5-5 mg 3-4 times per day, with
increases done at weekly intervals. For chronic pain, 30-60 mg total daily dose is
typical range.
For opioid dependence, methadone should be prescribed by programs and
providers with federal licensure to treat opioid dependence with methadone. It
should not be initiated for this purpose without enrollment in such a program. For
opioid dependence, methadone is started at a dose of 20-300mg/day, with a
maximum dose of 30 mg [59, 60]. An additional 10 mg can be given on the first
day if withdrawal symptoms persist hours later. If the initial dose of methadone is
too high, patients may experience respiratory depression, urinary retention, edema,
and abdominal distension. After the first day, the dose is then increased at 5-10 mg
increments daily until 60-80 mg/day is reached. Dose increases after 80 mg /day
should proceed slowly based on the individual patient’s cravings and withdrawal
symptoms. Most patients are stable on doses 80-120mg/day [59].
Main drug interactions: Phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, rifamycins, benzodiazepines.
Concomitant use with MAOI’s can induce serotonin syndrome.
Main side effects: Constipation, sedation, potential QTc prolongation.
Special points: Methadone serum half-life ranges from 20-100 hours, and is dosed every 24 hours
for opioid replacement therapy. The analgesic effects of methadone are much
shorter (6-8 hours) and it is given more frequently for pain relief. . The peak
respiratory depression due to methadone occurs at 12-14 hours after the dose, and
lasts longer than the analgesic effects, which contributes to the risk of overdose
[60]. Respiratory depression has been implicated as the cause of death in most
methadone-related deaths [60]. Even if the patient has a history of opioid tolerance,
it should be started at low doses and increased slowly. If the patient is already
taking other opioids, those medications can be tapered while the methadone is being
titrated up. It can also cause QT prolongation, particularly at higher doses and
when combined with other medications with QT prolongation effects. No
neurotoxic metabolites. Chronic low-dose methadone may be safe for pain and have
the side benefit of suppressing opioid cravings [30].
Cost: Low cost

Partial Opioid Agonists

Buprenorphine:
Standard dosage: 8-16 mg sublingual daily for opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence, but
doses as low as 2 mg a day or as high as 32 mg a day have been used successfully
Contraindications: Concurrent use of other opioids. Attaches tightly to mu receptor, limiting the ability
of other opioids to act
Main drug interactions: CNS depressants, azole antifungals, macrolide antibiotics, HIV antivirals, and
protease inhibitors
Main side effects: Taste aversion, sedation in opioid naïve individuals.
Special points: Has a ceiling effect at the mu receptor. Respiratory depression not easily reversed
with naloxone. It has some analgesic properties, and preliminary data suggests it
can be used to decrease pain (off-label) and to concomitantly treat opioid
dependence [30]. Because the analgesic effects are shorter than the serum half-life,
analgesic dosing should be every 6 hours
Cost: High cost

Topical medications

Topical medications have shown efficacy for decreasing musculoskeletal pain and often have fewer side effects than systemic therapy. Lidocaine has been proven to be effective for chronic pain due to post-herpetic neuralgia [61] and diabetic neuropathy [62], and limited evidence exists for the use of lidocaine with other chronic pain conditions, Class I [62]. Topical capsaicin is useful as an adjunct to other medications for chronic pain patients, Class I [63]. Topical NSAIDs, such as diclofenac, have also proven efficacy for osteoarthritis, but not for chronic low back pain [64].

Capsaicin:
Standard dosage: 3-4 times per day for arthritis and musculoskeletal pain
Contraindications: Specific contraindications have not been determined
Main drug interactions: None
Main side effects: Erythema, pain, rash, or pruritis of application site; nausea; nasopharyngitis;
hypertension
Special points: Treatment area may be heat-sensitive, and patient should not apply cream directly
before bathing, swimming, sun bathing, or exercise.
Cost: Low cost

Lidocaine Cream and Patch (Lidoderm):
Standard dosage: 5% ointment, maximum dose of 17-20 g of ointment daily; apply up to 3 patches
topically at one time, for up to 12 hours within a 24-hour period.
Contraindications: Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type.
Main drug interactions: None for topical lidocaine.
Main side effects: Rare for topical application.
Cost: High cost patch, low cost cream

BenGay (Camphor 4%, Menthol 10%, Methylsalicylate 30%):
Standard dosage: Apply to affected area 3-4 times daily
Contraindications: hypersensitivity to Camphor, hypersensitivity to peppermint, menthol, or any other
member of the mint family, topical application should not be used on the face or
chest of infants or small children or on open skin areas.
Main drug interactions: No drug interaction data available.
Main side effects: Nausea, vomiting, warmth, headache, confusion, vertigo, delirium, hallucinations,
tremors, elevated LDH, contact eczema, contact dermatitis.
Cost: Low cost

Diclofenac (topical)
Standard dosage: (1% gel) 2-4 gm applied daily around joint (1.5% solution) 10 drops around
affected joints 4 times daily
Contraindications: NSAID or aspirin allergy
Main drug interactions: Concomitant use of Ketoralac (Strong NSAID) or Cyclosporine
Main side effects: Local site reaction, blood coagulation disorder [65]
Cost: High cost
Physical/speech therapy and exercise
• Exercise, including physical therapy, aerobic exercise, and yoga, has been
evaluated to treat various chronic pain syndromes, including fibromyalgia
and chronic low back pain. Although there is currently no evidence to
support the use of exercise in patients with concurrent opioid dependence,
the exercise interventions below will likely have a positive effect on these
patients.

Physical Therapy
  • Exercise has been used to improve pain in patients with chronic low back pain. In a Cochrane review including 43 randomized trials pertaining to chronic low back pain, exercise therapy was found to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults, Class I [20]. A systematic review by Hayden et al states that healthcare personnel supervision during physiotherapy for chronic low back pain may further improve pain and function, Class I [21].

  • Exercise has also been used as a treatment for fibromyalgia. Moderate quality evidence from a Cochrane Review supports aerobic-only exercise training for improving global well-being and physical function for patients with fibromyalgia, Class I [22]. A lack of evidence precludes the evaluation of the benefits of strength-only and flexibility-only training for patients with fibromyalgia in the same Cochrane Review. Additionally, a meta-analysis that examined 33 trials in which physical therapy and exercise were used as treatment for fibromyalgia indicated a moderate effect on pain [23].


Yoga
  • A systematic review including 10 randomized controlled trials and a total of 967 patients concluded that strong evidence supported short-term effectiveness of yoga for low back pain patients and moderate evidence for the long-term effectiveness, Class I [25].

  • In a randomized trial of 313 patients with chronic low back pain, Tilbrook et al found that patients offered yoga (n = 156) v. usual care (n = 157) had better back function (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), and higher pain self-efficiency scores at 3, 6, and 12 months, Class I [27].

  • In another randomized controlled trial of 228 adults with chronic low back pain, Sherman et al found that yoga was superior to a self-care book at 12 weeks (mean difference for function, −2.5 [95% CI, −3.7 to −1.3], P < 0.001) and at 26 weeks (mean difference, −1.8 [95% CI, −3.1 to −0.5]; P < .001) but not to conventional stretching at any time [26].

  • In a systematic review of yoga for rheumatic diseases, Cramer et al found two randomized controlled trials pertaining to yoga for fibromyalgia. Based on these data, only a weak recommendation could be made, Class I [28].

Other treatments
• Clinical trials have investigated acupuncture, Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT), and massage as effective treatment options for chronic
pain in general populations, with limited evidence in populations with
addiction or opioid dependence. Mindfulness and qigong have not been
shown to be effective for pain conditions. CBT, while effective for pain,
has not been shown to be effective for addiction. It is not clear how it
would work in populations with opioid dependence.

Acupuncture for Chronic Pain
  • Acupuncture uses thin needles inserted into specific points on the body. Acupuncture has been used in China for centuries to treat many disorders. A more modern type of acupuncture, transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation (TEAS), uses electrodes placed on the skin to apply electrical stimulation at acupoints.

  • Acupuncture has been shown to be effective in reducing pain in patients with chronic pain conditions. A Cochrane review of 9 randomized controlled trials indicates low to moderate quality evidence supports the use of acupuncture to improve pain and stiffness in patients with fibromyalgia, Class I [66].

  • In a meta-analysis including 29 RCTs and data for 17, 922 patients, Vickers et al found that acupuncture improved pain in back and neck pain, chronic headache, and shoulder pain (P < 0.001), Class I [67].

  • Cherkin et al performed a four-arm randomized trial of 638 patients with chronic low back pain and determined that improvements in back-related dysfunction (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score) were greater in patients receiving individualized, standardized, or simulated acupuncture as compared with controls, Class I [68]. These improvements were present at 1 year.

  • Acupuncture may also play a role in decreasing opioid use in chronic pain patients. In a small randomized controlled trial of 35 chronic pain patients receiving opioids for pain, short-term reduction in opioid-like medications (codeine, methadone, oxycodone, morphine and tramadol) was found in those who received acupuncture (39% v. 25% reduction in opioid use), Class II [69]. However, the reduced consumption of opioids did not last beyond 8 weeks after treatment. A Cochrane review including this study stated that no conclusions could be made about the efficacy of the acupuncture treatment for reducing opioid use in chronic non-cancer pain patients, Class I [70].


Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
  • In a Cochrane review of patients with chronic pain, CBT was found to have small to moderate effects on disability, pain, mood, and catastrophizing when compared with treatment as usual, but only mild improvements in disability and catastrophizing when compared with active controls, Class I [10].

  • In a systematic review and meta-analysis including 14 randomized trials and 910 patients with fibromyalgia, CBT was found to reduce depressed mood after treatment (SMD −0.24, 95% CI −0.40, −0.08; P = 0.004), and the number of physician visits (SMD −1.57, 95% CI −2.00, −1.14; P<0.001), but no effect was found on pain, fatigue, sleep, and healthrelated quality of life, Class I [71].

  • In a trial of 701 adults, patients with chronic low back pain were randomized to six sessions of group CBT (n = 468) or control (n = 233). The outcomes of a Roland Morris disability questionnaire (difference between groups 1.3 points, 0.56-2.06, p = 0.0008) and modified Von Korff disability (difference 8.4%, 4.47-12.32, p < 0.0001) and pain scores (difference 7.0%, 3.12-10.81, p<0.0001) at 12 months showed continued improvement on chronic low back pain in patients who received the intervention compared with controls [9].

  • In a Cochrane review of any psychosocial intervention plus pharmacological standard v. pharmacological standard treatment of opioid dependence, 34 randomized trials including 3777 patients were included, Class I [11]. The authors concluded that adding psychosocial support does not change retention in treatment or opiate use during treatment.

  • In a trial of 141 opioid dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone in a primary care setting, patients were randomized to physician management or physician management and CBT. No difference in effectiveness for addiction was found between the two groups, Class II [12].

  • In Cochrane review of psychosocial treatment only for opioid abuse and dependence, five randomized trials including 389 patients were analyzed. Mayet et al found that psychosocial treatments are not currently proved to be effective alone and are not superior to any other type of treatment, Class I [13].


Mindfulness
  • In a trial of 99 patients with chronic pain, patients were randomized to receive a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program (n=51) or a multidisciplinary intervention (n=48), and no significant difference in pain intensity or pain-related distress was found between the two groups, Class II [15].

  • In a three-armed randomized controlled trial of 177 female patients with fibromyalgia, patients were randomized to MBSR (n = 53), active control (n = 56), or a wait list (n = 59). No significant differences between groups in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was found (p = 0.004), Class II [14]. Post-hoc analysis showed that patients receiving MBSR had the greatest pre- to- post improvements in HRQoL (p = 0.02).


Qigong
• Qigong is a form of Chinese medicine that includes deep breathing exercises
and meditation. Qigong has been investigated as a treatment for pain due to
fibromyalgia. In a systematic review of 7 articles and 395 fibromyalgia
patients, Lauche et al. found low-quality evidence to support the use of
qigong to improve pain, quality of life, and sleep. No evidence was found for
superiority of qigong over usual care of patients with fibromyalgia, Class I
[72].

Massage
  • In a systematic review, Kumar et al concluded that massage may have some increased benefit for patients with chronic pain compared with relaxation, but no statement could be made about spinal manipulation, Class I [73].

  • In a trial of 401 patients randomized to structural massage (n = 132), relaxation massage (n = 136) or usual care (n = 133), the adjusted Roland Disability Questionnaire score was lower in both the relaxation and structural massage groups after 10 weeks, Class II [74].

Multidisciplinary Therapy
• Multidisciplinary treatment for pain conditions has been shown in
individual trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews to be more
effective than control conditions [75]. Inpatient treatment programs tend
to be more intense that outpatient but do not have strong advantage over
outpatient treatment when accounting for intensity. In particular, chronic
back pain benefit from multidisciplinary treatment. A Cochrane review
of multidisciplinary treatment for fibromyalgia showed mixed results
without evidence of efficacy in low quality studies [76]. Behavioral
treatment and stress reduction as well as physical training appear to be
beneficial aspects of multidisciplinary treatment [76]. Class II

Opinion statement.

Chronic pain may last for months to years, and is often heightened by co-morbid opioid dependence; thus, setting realistic expectations for both patient and physician is a key step in formulating treatment plans. Chronic pain is influenced by psychological, social and environmental factors in addition to somatic pathology, and thus, treatment needs to encompass more than just analgesia. The specific treatments should address contributors to and sequelae of chronic pain and addiction (e.g. social isolation, physical disability, depression, anxiety, obesity, financial stress, housing instability) and include multimodal interventions: psychosocial engagement, physical mobility and conditioning, weight loss, substance use treatment, and medications. Psychosocial treatments include evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapies, substance abuse treatment groups, 12-step programs and other social activities. Physical mobility and conditioning can be accomplished with physical therapy, yoga, or other exercise programs, and are essential to avoid loss of function and a negative functional spiral. In the setting of obesity, diet in combination with exercise can decrease pain and improve function. Substance abuse treatment is essential for patients with comorbid pain and opioid dependence. Opioid replacement therapies may have some added analgesic benefit. Medication can help decrease the pain level and alleviate some of the complicating conditions but is unlikely to be effective used in isolation. Opioid analgesics are generally not recommended in cases of patient with opioid dependence because of mixed evidence for efficacy and high risk.

Footnotes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines Conflict of interest Jane Liebschutz, Donna Beers and Allison Lange declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

*of importance

  • 1.Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. Jama. 2003;290(18):2443–54. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Compton P, Charuvastra VC, Ling W. Pain intolerance in opioid-maintained former opiate addicts: effect of long-acting maintenance agent. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;63(2):139–46. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pud D, Cohen D, Lawental E, Eisenberg E. Opioids and abnormal pain perception: New evidence from a study of chronic opioid addicts and healthy subjects. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;82(3):218–23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barry DT, Beitel M, Garnet B, Joshi D, Rosenblum A, Schottenfeld RS. Relations among psychopathology, substance use, and physical pain experiences in methadone-maintained patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(9):1213–8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosenblum A, Joseph H, Fong C, Kipnis S, Cleland C, Portenoy RK. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain among chemically dependent patients in methadone maintenance and residential treatment facilities. Jama. 2003;289(18):2370–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tsui JI, Herman DS, Kettavong M, Alford D, Anderson BJ, Stein MD. Physician introduction to opioids for pain among patients with opioid dependence and depressive symptoms. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;39(4):378–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ang DC, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Wu J, Tu W, Kroenke K. Predictors of pain outcomes in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain co-morbid with depression: results from a randomized controlled trial. Pain Med. 2010;11(4):482–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tsui JI, Cheng DM, Coleman SM, Blokhina E, Bridden C, Krupitsky E, et al. Pain is associated with heroin use over time in HIV-infected Russian drinkers. Addiction. 2013;108(10):1779–87. doi: 10.1111/add.12274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):916–23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62164-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;14(11) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S. Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;5(10) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004147.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fiellin DA, Barry DT, Sullivan LE, Cutter CJ, Moore BA, O’Connor PG, et al. A randomized trial of cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care-based buprenorphine. Am J Med. 2013;126(1):005. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mayet S, Farrell M, Ferri M, Amato L, Davoli M. Psychosocial treatment for opiate abuse and dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;25(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004330.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schmidt S, Grossman P, Schwarzer B, Jena S, Naumann J, Walach H. Treating fibromyalgia with mindfulness-based stress reduction: results from a 3-armed randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011;152(2):361–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wong SY, Chan FW, Wong RL, Chu MC, Kitty Lam YY, Mercer SW, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and multidisciplinary intervention programs for chronic pain: a randomized comparative trial. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(8):724–34. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182183c6e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herring MP, O’Connor PJ, Dishman RK. The effect of exercise training on anxiety symptoms among patients: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):321–31. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martin CK, Church TS, Thompson AM, Earnest CP, Blair SN. Exercise dose and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(3):269–78. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hankinson AL, Daviglus ML, Bouchard C, Carnethon M, Lewis CE, Schreiner PJ, et al. Maintaining a high physical activity level over 20 years and weight gain. Jama. 2010;304(23):2603–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E, Limke J, Jouve C, Finno M. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4(1):106–15. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00174-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;20(3) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):776–85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Busch AJ, Barber KA, Overend TJ, Peloso PM, Schachter CL. Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17(4) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003786.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nuesch E, Hauser W, Bernardy K, Barth J, Juni P. Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: network meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):955–62. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hauser W, Thieme K, Turk DC. Guidelines on the management of fibromyalgia syndrome - a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(1):5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Dobos G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(5):450–60. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31825e1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Wellman RD, Cook AJ, Hawkes RJ, Delaney K, et al. A randomized trial comparing yoga, stretching, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):2019–26. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tilbrook HE, Cox H, Hewitt CE, Kang’ombe AR, Chuang LH, Jayakody S, et al. Yoga for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(9):569–78. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-9-201111010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J, Dobos G. Yoga for rheumatic diseases: a systematic review. Rheumatology. 2013;52(11):2025–30. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Senna MK, Sallam RA, Ashour HS, Elarman M. Effect of weight reduction on the quality of life in obese patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31(11):1591–7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2053-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *30.Neumann AM, Blondell RD, Jaanimagi U, Giambrone AK, Homish GG, Lozano JR, et al. A preliminary study comparing methadone and buprenorphine in patients with chronic pain and coexistent opioid addiction. J Addict Dis. 2013;32(1):68–78. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2012.759872. This small randomized trial compared methadone and buprenorphine as treatments for chronic pain in patients with opioid dependence.
  • 31.Christensen R, Bartels EM, Astrup A, Bliddal H. Effect of weight reduction in obese patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(4):433–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.065904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Messier SP, Loeser RF, Miller GD, Morgan TM, Rejeski WJ, Sevick MA, et al. Exercise and dietary weight loss in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis: the Arthritis, Diet, and Activity Promotion Trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(5):1501–10. doi: 10.1002/art.20256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Aerobic walking or strengthening exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee? A systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(4):544–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.028746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nicholas MK, Asghari A, Blyth FM, Wood BM, Murray R, McCabe R, et al. Self-management intervention for chronic pain in older adults: a randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2013;154(6):824–35. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gustavsson C, Denison E, von Koch L. Self-management of persistent neck pain: two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent group intervention in primary health care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(25):2105–15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182028b04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2226–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60402-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D, Holden RR, Weaver DF, Houlden RL. Morphine, Gabapentin, or Their Combination for Neuropathic Pain. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(13):1324–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042580. doi:doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Organization WH. Cancer Pain Relief with a guide to opioid availability. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Towheed TE, Maxwell L, Judd MG, Catton M, Hochberg MC, Wells G. Acetaminophen for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;25(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004257.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kroenke K, Krebs EE, Bair MJ. Pharmacotherapy of chronic pain: a synthesis of recommendations from systematic reviews. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009;31(3):206–19. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, Koes BW, Scholten RJ, van Tulder MW. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: an updated Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(16):1766–74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817e69d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zerbini C, Ozturk ZE, Grifka J, Maini M, Nilganuwong S, Morales R, et al. Efficacy of etoricoxib 60 mg/day and diclofenac 150 mg/day in reduction of pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: results of a 4-week, multinational, randomized, double-blind study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21(12):2037–49. doi: 10.1185/030079905X75069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chung JW, Zeng Y, Wong TK. Drug therapy for the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2013;16(6):E685–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Malskat WS, Knulst AC, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Rockmann H. Tolerance to alternative cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitive patients. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013;3(1):2045–7022. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-3-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tofferi JK, Jackson JL, O’Malley PG. Treatment of fibromyalgia with cyclobenzaprine: A meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(1):9–13. doi: 10.1002/art.20076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Moldofsky H, Harris HW, Archambault WT, Kwong T, Lederman S. Effects of bedtime very low dose cyclobenzaprine on symptoms and sleep physiology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(12):2653–63. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Spence MM, Shin PJ, Lee EA, Gibbs NE. Risk of injury associated with skeletal muscle relaxant use in older adults. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(7-8):993–8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, Aldington D, Cole P, Rice AS, et al. Antiepileptic drugs for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia - an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11(11) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010567.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Argoff CE, Backonja MM, Belgrade MJ, Bennett GJ, Clark MR, Cole BE, et al. Consensus guidelines: treatment planning and options. Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(4 Suppl):S12–25. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(11)61475-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain. 2007;132(3):237–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hauser W, Bernardy K, Uceyler N, Sommer C. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with antidepressants: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2009;301(2):198–209. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moore RA, Derry S, Aldington D, Cole P, Wiffen PJ. Amitriptyline for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(12) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008242.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kroenke K, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Wu J, Hoke S, Sutherland J, et al. Optimized antidepressant therapy and pain self-management in primary care patients with depression and musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2009;301(20):2099–110. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lunn MP, Hughes RA, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zin CS, Nissen LM, Smith MT, O’Callaghan JP, Moore BJ. An update on the pharmacological management of post-herpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. CNS Drugs. 2008;22(5):417–42. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822050-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Frakes EP, Risser RC, Ball TD, Hochberg MC, Wohlreich MM. Duloxetine added to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of knee pain due to osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(12):2361–72. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.633502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Abou-Raya S, Abou-Raya A, Helmii M. Duloxetine for the management of pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2012;41(5):646–52. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Noble M, Treadwell JR, Tregear SJ, Coates VH, Wiffen PJ, Akafomo C, et al. Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;20(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006605.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Joseph H, Stancliff S, Langrod J. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): a review of historical and clinical issues. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;67(5-6):347–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Corkery JM, Schifano F, Ghodse AH, Oyefeso A. The effects of methadone and its role in fatalities. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004;19(8):565–76. doi: 10.1002/hup.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Khaliq W, Alam S, Puri N. Topical lidocaine for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18(2) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004846.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Argoff CE. Topical analgesics in the management of acute and chronic pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(2):195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mason L, Moore RA, Derry S, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ. Systematic review of topical capsaicin for the treatment of chronic pain. Bmj. 2004;328(7446):19. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38042.506748.EE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Haroutiunian S, Drennan DA, Lipman AG. Topical NSAID therapy for musculoskeletal pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(4):535–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Derry S, Moore RA, Rabbie R. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12(9) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007400.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Deare JC, Zheng Z, Xue CC, Liu JP, Shang J, Scott SW, et al. Acupuncture for treating fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;31(5) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007070.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, Lewith G, MacPherson H, Foster NE, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(19):1444–53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *68.Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Avins AL, Erro JH, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, et al. A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):858–66. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.65. This randomized trial reports that patients with chronic back pain who received acupuncture had greater improvements in back-related dysfunction, and that these improvements were present 1 year later
  • 69.Zheng Z, Guo RJ, Helme RD, Muir A, Da Costa C, Xue CC. The effect of electroacupuncture on opioid-like medication consumption by chronic pain patients: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(5):671–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Windmill J, Fisher E, Eccleston C, Derry S, Stannard C, Knaggs R, et al. Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non-cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1(9) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010323.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bernardy K, Fuber N, Kollner V, Hauser W. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome - a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(10):1991–2005. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lauche R, Cramer H, Hauser W, Dobos G, Langhorst J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of qigong for the fibromyalgia syndrome. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;635182(10):31. doi: 10.1155/2013/635182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kumar S, Beaton K, Hughes T. The effectiveness of massage therapy for the treatment of nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Int J Gen Med. 2013 Sep 4;6:733–741. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S50243. eCollection 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Kahn J, Wellman R, Cook AJ, Johnson E, et al. A comparison of the effects of 2 types of massage and usual care on chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(1):1–9. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, Sprott H. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology. 2008;47(5):670–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for fibromyalgia and musculoskeletal pain in working age adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES