Abstract
The identification of neural stem and progenitor cells (NPCs) by in vivo brain imaging could have important implications for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purposes. We describe a metabolic biomarker for the detection and quantification of NPCs in the human brain in vivo. We used proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to identify and characterize a biomarker in which NPCs are enriched and demonstrated its use as a reference for monitoring neurogenesis. To detect low concentrations of NPCs in vivo, we developed a signal processing method that enabled the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the analysis of the NPC biomarker in both the rodent brain and the hippocampus of live humans. Our findings thus open the possibility of investigating the role of NPCs and neurogenesis in a wide variety of human brain disorders.
The adult mammalian brain retains the ability to generate new neurons. These neurons are produced from neural stem and progenitor cells (NPCs), which reside in the hippocampus and the subventricular zone (1–4). NPCs possess the ability to self-renew and also to generate progeny that can give rise to mature cell types. The ability of NPCs to produce neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes in vitro and in vivo raises the prospect of harnessing them to repair nerve tissue damaged or lost to neurological disease or trauma (1, 2, 4). The realization of the curative potential of NPCs would benefit from the development of methods that would enable their identification and tracking in vivo. Currently, positron emission tomography, single-photon computed tomography scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are being examined toward this goal (5–7). These technologies require NPCs to be preloaded ex vivo with radiolabeled agents or superparamagnetic iron oxide–based derivatives, and therefore are not applied for the detection of endogenous NPCs in the human brain. We used proton magnetic resonance spectrosopy (1H-MRS) to overcome the above limitations and to detect NPCs in the live human brain.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) has been widely used for in vitro detection of low quantities of known metabolites and the identification of unknown compounds present in body fluids or tissues in vitro (8). 1H-NMR can identify metabolites that are specific for neurons [such as N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)] or glia [such as choline (Cho) and myoinositol (mI)], and these compounds have been used as reliable biomarkers of the corresponding cell types in isolated tissue samples. However, 1H-NMR cannot be used to analyze metabolites in live organisms; instead, its correlate, 1H-MRS, is used to provide information about the metabolic status of a tissue in vivo (9). These two techniques complement each other when physiological or pathological states are investigated (10–12). Thus, we decided to search for NPC-specific metabolites using 1H-NMR and then to exploit the information about these metabolites for detecting NPCs in the live brain using 1H-MRS.
To identify unique features in the spectroscopic profile of NPCs, we compared the 1H-NMR spectra of NPCs from embryonic mouse brain tissue cultivated as neurospheres in vitro (13) with the spectra of cultured neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes (Fig. 1A). The NPC spectra demonstrated a unique profile, including a prominent peak at the frequency of 1.28 parts per million (ppm), which was not observed in other neural cell types (Fig. 1A). Quantification of the selected signal amplitude confirmed that NPCs were strongly enriched in the 1.28-ppm biomarker as compared to other cell types, whereas, as expected, NAA (2.02 ppm) was predominant in neurons and Cho (3.22 ppm) in astrocytes (Fig. 1B). Small amounts of NAA and Cho were also observed in NPCs, most likely reflecting the presence of neuron- and astrocyte-committed progenitors in the neurospheres. The 1.28-ppm biomarker was detected, to a lesser degree, in our oligodendrocyte preparation, perhaps due to the presence of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs; also see Fig. 1D) within the primary cultures analyzed. The amplitude of the 1.28-ppm signal on the 1H-NMR spectra was proportional to the number of NPCs taken for analysis (Fig. 1C); this linear correlation indicated that it is possible to quantitatively account for NPCs based on the amount of the 1.28-ppm 1H-NMR signal.
To further examine the specificity of the 1.28-ppm biomarker, we compared the 1H-NMR spectroscopic profile of NPCs with the profiles of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), cells of the hair follicle–derived sphere cultures (SPCs) (14), OPCs, and other types of cells that may be present in the brain, such as macrophages, T lymphocytes, and microglia. The 1.28-ppm biomarker was detected in ESCs, SPCs, and OPCs at significantly lower levels than in the NPCs and was near or below the detection limit in the resting macrophages, T lymphocytes, and microglia (Fig. 1D). We also performed experiments with cultured neurospheres derived from brains of transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of nestin gene regulatory elements (13). Nestin-GFP neuro-spheres were dissociated and cells were sorted on the basis of GFP expression levels by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (fig. S2). NPC-enriched GFP-expressing cell populations contained higher levels of the 1.28-ppm biomarker than did GFP-negative cells (fig. S2). Together, these experiments indicate that progenitor cells of different origin (but each with neural potential) express the 1.28-ppm biomarker; that among the panel of tested cells, NPCs have the highest level of the biomarker; and that neither postmitotic differentiated cells nor cells without progenitor properties express the biomarker.
If the presence of the 1.28-ppm biomarker correlates with the progenitor status of cells, the levels of this biomarker should decrease as cells differentiate in vitro or in vivo, whereas the levels of the biomarkers of differentiated cells should increase. We cultivated neurospheres under conditions that promote their neuronal and astrocytic differentiation and analyzed their 1HNMR spectra. The levels of the 1.28-ppm biomarker decreased, whereas the levels of the neuronal biomarker NAA and astrocytic biomarker Cho increased after several days of cultivation (Fig. 2A).We next compared the spectra of cells isolated from the mouse brain at embryonic day 12 (E12), when neurogenesis begins, and at postnatal day 30 (P30), when most of the cells in the brain have already differentiated. The levels of the 1.28-ppm biomarker were significantly reduced, whereas the levels of biomarkers of differentiated cells were significantly elevated, in the postnatal adult brain as compared to the embryonic brain (Fig. 2B).
We next examined whether neurogenic regions of the adult brain are enriched in the 1.28-ppm biomarker. We compared the 1H-NMR spectra of cells isolated from the adult mouse hippocampus, where continuous neurogenesis takes place, and from the cortex, where neurogenesis is not detected (1, 2, 15). A significantly higher amount of the 1.28-ppm biomarker was observed in the adult hippocampus as compared to the cortex (Fig. 2C), providing additional evidence that the presence of the 1.28-ppm biomarker correlates with the presence of NPCs. We then analyzed whether changes in the levels of the 1.28-ppm biomarker correlate with dynamic changes in adult neurogenesis. Neurogenesis in the adult mammalian hippocampus is sensitive to a wide range of stimuli, including electroconvulsive shock (ECS) (16–21).We applied ECS to adult mice and assessed cell proliferation using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus and measured levels of the 1.28-ppm biomarker using 1H-NMR. The number of BrdU-immunoreactive cells was significantly increased in ECS-treated, as compared to control sham-operated, animals, demonstrating the effectiveness of the procedure (Fig. 2D). The levels of the 1.28-ppm biomarker in the preparation of cells from the hippocampus were also significantly increased after ECS (Fig. 2D). Together, our results with the cultured NPCs and with the developing and adult animal brain demonstrate that the amount of 1.28-ppm biomarker correlates with neurogenesis and suggest that changes in neurogenesis can be analyzed using the 1.28-ppm biomarker as a valid reference for NPCs.
We next sought to characterize the chemical nature of the 1.28-ppm biomarker. A specific group of resonances in the 0 to 2 ppm range of the 1H-NMR is thought to arise from macromolecules and the fatty acyl chains of triacylglycerides and cholesterol esters found in free-floating mobile lipids in the cytoplasm and in unrestricted lipid microdomains near the plasma membrane (22). Proton chemical shift correlation spectroscopy of NPCs showed that there was a J-coupling partner for the 1.28-ppm biomarker at 0.8 ppm, as would be expected for a fatty acid containing methyl (−CH3) groups on the same molecule (fig. S3 and Fig. 1A). The notion that the 1.28-ppm biomarker corresponds to lipids was also supported by a decrease in the 1.28-ppm signal amplitude when neurospheres were treated with cerulenin, an inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis (Fig. 2E). To further examine whether the 1.28-ppm biomarker contains lipids, we analyzed the 1H-NMR spectra of NPCs extracted with a chloroform/methanol mixture. The 1.28-ppmbiomarker was mainly present in the chloroform fraction, which is suggestive of a lipid metabolite (Fig. 2G). Indeed, it overlapped with some of the specific fatty acid spectra, most closely with the spectra of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), such as palmitic acid, and of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), such as oleic acid (Fig. 2G). The spectra of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as arachidonic acid, which resonate in the1.3- to 1.4-ppm range, did not overlap (Fig. 2G). Using gas chromatography, we sought to separate and quantify specific fatty acids in NPCs and compare them to those found in astrocytes. There was a higher concentration of SFAs and MUFAs than of PUFAs in NPCs, but not in astrocytes (Fig. 2F). Together, our results suggest that the 1.28-ppm biomarker is most likely a mixture of lipids that include SFAs and/or MUFAs.
We next addressed the possibility of using the NPC biomarker for in vivo brain imaging. Using a 9.4-T micro MRI (mMRI) scanner, we obtained adult rat spectra of the hippocampus, where endogenous NPCs reside, and the parietal cortex, where dividing NPCs are undetectable (Fig. 3). Traditional Fourier transform signal processing was unable to distinguish the 1.28-ppm biomarker in the hippocampus from background noise (Fig. 3A, insets), most likely due to a low NPC density in the adult rat hippocampus. Therefore, we developed a more sensitive signal-processing algorithm in order to isolate the signal of the 1.28-ppm biomarker from the noise within the in vivo 1H-MRS spectra. We used singular value decomposition (SVD), which permits improved detection at low signal-to-noise ratios and allows better resolution of signal components (modes) that are close to one another in a given frequency domain (23–25). Based on SVD signal processing, we developed an algorithm that enables detection of the 1.28-ppm biomarker in the adult rat hippocampus in vivo (Fig. 3A, red peak). Absolute quantification of the 1.28-ppm biomarker was achieved by estimating the amplitude of the 1.28-ppm signal, whereas relative quantification was achieved by ratiometric analysis with the creatine (Cr) signal amplitude as a denominator. Both quantification methods are established as reliable indicators of a given concentration of metabolite (26). A large difference was observed when the absolute quantities of the 1.28-ppm biomarker were compared between the hippocampal and cortical spectra; this was paralleled by the ratiometric quantification, which confirmed that the hippocampus was highly enriched in the 1.28-ppm biomarker as compared to the cortex (Fig. 3A).
We also transplanted NPCs into the left cortical hemisphere of the adult rat brain and injected an equal volume of saline into the control right hemisphere. 1H-MRS data were obtained for both hemispheres from voxels of the same size, centered on the injected areas (Fig. 3B). Both Fourier transform (inset) and SVD-based signal processing (colored peaks) clearly detected the 1.28-ppm biomarker in the spectra of the experimental site containing NPCs (Fig. 3B). Both the direct quantification and the ratiometric analysis demonstrated that the signal in the hemisphere with the injected NPCs was more than 35 times greater than that in the corresponding region of the control cortical hemisphere (Fig. 3B).
Furthermore, to detect changes in the density of endogenous NPCs in vivo, we treated adult rats with ECS. Five days after the treatment, we injected BrdU to label dividing cells and analyzed the ECS-treated and sham-operated control animals the next day. Quantification of the 1.28-ppm:Cr signal amplitude ratios in the hippocampus showed a significant increase of the 1.28-ppm biomarker in ECS-treated rats as compared to sham-operated controls (Fig. 3C). To validate the spectroscopic findings, we quantified the number of BrdU-immunoreactive cells in the hippocampus of the same animals (Fig. 3D). A significant increase in the number of BrdU-immunoreactive cells in ECS-treated rats as compared to sham-operated controls demonstrated that, as expected, ECS increased NPC proliferation. Moreover, in the ECS-treated animals, we found a correlation between the number of BrdU-immunoreactive cells and the 1.28-ppm:Cr signal amplitude ratio in the hippocampus of the same animal (Fig. 3E). Together, these data indicate that 1H-MRS can be used to detect and measure changes in the density of endogenous NPCs in vivo.
We then proceeded with the identification of endogenous NPCs in the human brain. Brain 1H-MRS was performed on healthy adults, using a 3-T MRI scanner and SVD-based signal processing (Fig. 4A). An experimental voxel was placed along the length of the hippocampus, while a control voxel of the same volume included gray and white matter of the ipsilateral parietal cortex (Fig. 4A). The Fourier transform did not reveal the 1.28-ppm biomarker (inset) in any of the voxels (Fig. 4A). However, the SVD-based analysis (colored peaks) clearly detected the 1.28-ppm biomarker in the hippocampal spectra, indicating that this methodology can be used to identify endogenous NPCs in the human brain (Fig. 4A). For each person, we found a major difference between the hippocampus and the cortex when using either absolute or ratiometric quantification of the 1.28-ppm biomarker, indicating that both can be applied to indirectly measure NPC density in the human hippocampus. No difference in the level of the 1.28-ppm biomarker was observed when the left and right hippocampi were compared (Fig. 4A). Further-more, when we imaged the left hippocampus of the same people after a 3-month period during which there was no major change in their daily routine, no difference was observed in the 1.28-ppm biomarker (Fig. 4B). Finally, we analyzed the age-related changes in the 1.28-ppm biomarker during human development by imaging people of varying ages: preadolescents, adolescents, and adults. Quantification of the 1.28-ppm biomarker revealed a decrease in the 1.28-ppm signal amplitude (Fig. 4C), which is compatible with data demonstrating age-related decrease in neurogenesis in animals (27).
In our work, we identified a spectroscopic biomarker of NPCs, developed a methodology to detect this biomarker in the live brain, and demonstrated the use of the biomarker for identifying NPCs in the live human brain. The NPC biomarker could be readily detected in vitro with 1H-NMR, but its detection at low concentrations in the live brain with 1H-MRS required the development of more refined methodology. Our SVD-based signal processing proved to be superior to the traditionally used Fourier transform and can now be applied in a variety of imaging settings where low levels of a particular metabolite preclude its reliable detection in vivo.
Our results suggest that the NPC biomarker, represented by a 1.28-ppm spectral peak, is a complex mixture of saturated and/or monounsaturated fatty acids and related compounds. The functional relevance of these molecules for the control of proliferation and differentiation of NPCs remains to be elucidated.
Finally, our data on humans provide in vivo imaging evidence for NPCs in the human hippocampus. These findings support the numerous data demonstrating continuous neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus (1, 2, 28). We also demonstrated that in humans the presence of the NPC biomarker in the hippocampus dramatically decreases with age. Although a decrease in neurogenesis has been reported in aging mammals, these are the first data from the living human brain that indicate a decrease in NPCs during brain development from childhood to adulthood. More generally, this biomarker can be applied to track and analyze endogenous or transplanted NPCs, to monitor neurogenesis in a wide range of human neurological and psychiatric disorders, and to evaluate the efficiency of therapeutic interventions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Ziliox and K. DeCock for expert technical assistance with 1H-NMR spectroscopy; B. Forester for mMRI assistance; H. Colognato for OPC cultures; S. Tsirka for microglial cultures; J.-H. Park for advice on ECS; and A. Sierra, J. M. Encinas, J. S. Trimmer, P. Stavropoulos, and J. Banerji for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (grants R21NS05875-1 and 5K08 NS044276); U.S. Army Medical Research (grant DAMD170110754) (M.M.-S.); the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (grant T32DK07521-16) (L.N.M.); NINDS grant R01-NS32764; NARSAD; the Seraph Foundation; the Hartman Foundation; the Hope for Depression Foundation; the Hazan Foundation (G.E.); the U.S. Department of Energy (grant FWP MO-065) (H.B.); NSF (grant CCF-0515246); and the Office of Naval Research (grant N00014-06-1-0012) (P.D.).
Footnotes
Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5852/980/DC1
Materials and Methods
SOM Text
Figs. S1 to S3
References and Notes
- 1.Lie DC, Song H, Colamarino SA, Ming GL, Gage FH. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004;44:399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ming GL, Song H. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005;28:223. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.051804.101459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Curtis MA, et al. Science. 2007;315:1243. doi: 10.1126/science.1136281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goldman SA, Windrem MS. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 2006;361:1463. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cicchetti F, et al. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2007;2:130. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chin BB, et al. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2003;24:1149. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200311000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arbab AS, Liu W, Frank JA. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2006;3:427. doi: 10.1586/17434440.3.4.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Viant MR. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007;358:229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-244-1_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ross B, Bluml S. Anat. Rec. 2001;265:54. doi: 10.1002/ar.1058. (New Anat). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shinno H, et al. J. Neurol. Sci. 2007;260:132. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stengel A, et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52:228. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Narayana PA. J. Neuroimaging. 2005;15:46S. doi: 10.1177/1051228405284200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mignone JL, Kukekov V, Chiang AS, Steindler D, Enikolopov G. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004;469:311. doi: 10.1002/cne.10964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mignone JL, et al. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:2161. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.17.4593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bhardwaj RD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103:12564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605177103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2:266. doi: 10.1038/6368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. Nature. 1997;386:493. doi: 10.1038/386493a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Encinas JM, Vaahtokari A, Enikolopov G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103:8233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601992103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Warner-Schmidt JL, Duman RS. Hippocampus. 2006;16:239. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Madsen TM, et al. Biol. Psychiatry. 2000;47:1043. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Perera TD, et al. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:4894. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0237-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sparling ML, Zidovetzki R, Muller L, Chan SI. Anal. Biochem. 1989;178:67. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90358-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barkhuijsen H, de Beer R, van Ormondt D. J. Magn. Reson. 1987;73:553. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910020111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cavassila S, et al. J. Magn. Reson. Anal. 1997;3:87. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stoica P, Sandgren N, Selen Y, Vanhamme L, Van Huffel S. J. Magn. Reson. 2003;165:80. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(03)00188-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dieterle F, Ross A, Schlotterbeck G, Senn H. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:4281. doi: 10.1021/ac051632c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kuhn HG, Dickinson-Anson H, Gage FH. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:2027. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-06-02027.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eriksson PS, et al. Nat. Med. 1998;4:1313. doi: 10.1038/3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.