To the Editor
Allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) are a frequent complication of blood transfusion, occurring in at least 2% of platelet transfusions1, 2. The mechanisms of most ATRs are not understood. Antibodies to plasma proteins such as IgA3, 4, haptoglobin5, and C46 in blood transfusion recipients are reported but rarely identified. Furthermore, individuals react sporadically to transfusions, which is inconsistent with a recipient having hypersensitivity to a ubiquitous plasma protein.
We hypothesized that understanding the epidemiology and clinical presentation of ATRs will elucidate the underlying mechanism and guide strategies to prevent ATRs. We developed a cohort of platelet donors and the platelet transfusion recipients who received their donated products. The goals of this study are 1) to identify risk factors for ATRs, using platelet transfusion as a paradigm, and 2) to define the clinical and biochemical presentation of ATRs.
We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving single donor apheresis platelet transfusions and their platelet donors. We defined an ATR as an acute transfusion reaction that included pruritus, urticaria, or angioedema. We took an allergy history, measured allergic sensitization and tryptase on the ImmunoCAP platform, and measured urine eicosanoid metabolites by mass spectrometry. Additional details of the study design, laboratory measures, and analysis are provided in the online supplement.
Recipients who did (n=124) and did not (n=44) experience ATRs were similar in terms of transfusion history (Table E1). A primary oncology diagnosis was present in 92.9% of platelet recipients. Including transfusions prior to enrollment, 36 subjects had ≥2 ATRs to platelet transfusion. ATRs manifested during or within 1 hour after platelet transfusion in 95% of ATRs. Diphenhydramine premedication was given in 27.9% of control transfusions and 42.3% of transfusions that resulted in an ATR. For two transfusions in the ATR group (1.4%), ACE inhibitor medication was given in the 24 hours prior to transfusion.
Urticaria and pruritus were the most common symptoms (Table E2). Criteria for anaphylaxis were met in 26 ATRs (18.2%). Diphenhydramine was used to treat 77 ATRs (53.9%), an H2 receptor antagonist in 22 ATRs (15.4%), and glucocorticoids in 19 ATRs (13.3%). Epinephrine was given in one case (0.7%). A typical cutaneous reaction is shown in Figure E1.
A history of hay fever and food allergy were more frequent in platelet recipients experiencing an ATR (Table I). Reported grass sensitivity was more prevalent among ATR recipients than never ATR recipients (37% vs. 18%, P=0.02, Table E3). When we defined hay fever and food allergy as reporting symptoms plus a positive Phadiatop or fx5, respectively, the association of atopy with ATRs persisted for hay fever, but not for food allergy. In contrast, there was no association between Phadiatop concentrations and ATRs in donors.
Table I.
Atopic phenotype of platelet recipients and donors
| Platelet Recipient | ATR (n=124) | P | Platelet Donor | ATR (n=87) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never ATR (n=44) | No ATR (n=46) | |||||
| Reported Atopic History* | ||||||
| Hay fever | 23 (53.5%) | 86 (71.7%) | 0.04 | 36 (78.3%) | 60 (69%) | 0.31 |
| Asthma/albuterol use | 17 (38.6%) | 38 (31.7%) | 0.46 | 10 (21.7%) | 15 (17.2%) | 0.64 |
| Eczema | 7 (15.9%) | 16 (13.1%) | 0.62 | 13 (28.3%) | 10 (11.5%) | 0.03 |
| Food allergy | 1 (2.3%) | 18 (14.6%) | 0.03 | 3 (6.5%) | 8 (9.2%) | 0.75 |
| Symptoms in last week | 2 (4.8%) | 10 (8.9%) | 0.52 | 6 (13%) | 7 (8.0%) | 0.37 |
| Specific IgE Screen** | ||||||
| Phadiatop positive | 10 (28.6%) | 62 (55.9%) | 0.006 | 9 (40.9%) | 23 (41.8%) | 1 |
| fx5 positive | 2 (10.5%) | 4 (5.8%) | 0.61 | 3 (15%) | 7 (14.6%) | 1 |
| Confirmed hay fever† | 7 (18.9%) | 51 (47.7%) | 0.002 | 8 (29.6%) | 22 (34.4%) | 0.81 |
| Confirmed food allergy† | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.9%) | 1 | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.5%) | 1 |
Responses have <5% missing data
Phadiatop and fx5 tests were performed on subsets of platelet recipients (Phadiatop n=144, fx5 n=88) and platelet donors (Phadiatop n=78, fx5 n=69)
Confirmed = positive history + positive specific IgE screen
Among recipients, total and aeroallergen-specific IgE was higher in those with ATRs than those without (Figure 1). IgE concentrations in platelet donors are not associated with ATRs. For platelet recipients, each quartile increase of Phadiatop concentrations was associated with a 43.5% increase in ATR incidence (95% CI: 27.2%–62.0% increase; P<0.001), controlling for the number of transfusions. Similarly, there was a 44.9% increase in ATR incidence for each quartile increase of total IgE (95% CI: 21.7%–72.5% increase; P<0.001). No ethylene oxide specific IgE was detected in 25 platelet recipients with a high incidence of ATRs (data not shown). To validate the IgE results, we studied archived samples from the Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets7 (Figure E2). As in the present cohort, there was a direct relationship between incident ATRs and concentrations aeroallergen-specific and total IgE.
Figure 1. Plasma concentrations of IgE are higher in platelet recipients who have ATRs, not donors.
Phadiatop (A,B) and fx5 (C,D) was tested in platelet recipients who did and did not have a history of ATRs and platelet donors whose products did or did not cause an ATR. The reference line at 0.35 kUa/L indicates a likely clinically significant result. (E) Platelet recipient total IgE levels. (F) The relationship between quartiles of Phadiatop concentration and the frequency of ATRs among platelet recipients (minimum 10 transfusions). Bars represent median values.
Older subjects tended to have milder ATRs. For the risk of anaphylaxis vs. mucocutaneous reaction, the OR is 0.75 for each 10-year increase in age (95% CI: 0.61–0.91; P=0.004). The association of ATR severity with age remained statistically significant after controlling for the number of platelet transfusions an individual received (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59–0.90). The risk for an ATR of any severity decreases with increasing number of platelet transfusions (Figure E3). No donor characteristic was statistically significantly associated with ATR severity.
We evaluated recipient and donor co-dependent risk factors. There was no ATR in which a donor reported food allergy matched a platelet recipient’s food ingestion. There was no case of a platelet recipient with an active food allergy who received a platelet from a donor who had ingested the cognate food. In two ATR cases, donors reported remote histories of possible penicillin allergy (rash, rash/vomiting) and the patient was receiving a penicillin (ampicillin, amoxicillin). Neither donor had detectable penicilloyl G, penicilloyl V, or amoxicilloyl IgE antibodies.
To establish the involvement of mast cells in ATRs, plasma total tryptase was measured prior to and 25–90 minutes following an ATR in a convenience sample of 11 subjects. Plasma tryptase was elevated in 2 of 2 anaphylactic ATRs and 1 of 9 mucocutaneous ATRs (Figure E4). Among urine eicosanoids measured, PGD-M and LTE4 correlated best with ATR severity (Figure E5).
In summary, we examined the atopic history and allergic mediators in platelet donors and recipients to determine the natural history of and identify risk factors for ATRs. We demonstrate that 1) ATRs to platelet transfusion resemble Type I, IgE mediated hypersensitivity reactions both clinically and biochemically; 2) recipient atopy, particularly hay fever, is a risk factor for ATRs to platelets; 3) ATR rates decrease with increasing transfusion exposure, raising the possibility that desensitization to platelet transfusion may occur; and 4) atopy in blood donors is not associated with ATRs. Complementary combinations of food/drug allergy and food/drug exposures in blood donors and recipients are not a common source of ATRs, although they have been reported elsewhere8, 9. Given the involvement of mast cell degranulation and leukotriene pathway activation in ATRs, compounds that block these pathways may have utility for preventing ATRs in highly susceptible transfusion recipients, i.e. those with hay fever and recurrent ATRs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Sources of funding:
Supported by an American Society of Hematology Scholar Award
This manuscript was prepared using TRAP Research Materials obtained from the NHLBI Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the TRAP or the NHLBI.
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21HL107828.
A.A.R.T. was supported by the NIH 1K23AI093152-01A1 and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinician Scientist Development Award (#22006.02). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Supported by a Brigham and Women’s Hospital Biomedical Research Institute Microgrant
We are thankful for the efforts and collegiality of Katherine Condon, Rosemary Case, Alice Fuller, Erica Arnold, Gabriel Verzino, and the technologists and supervisors at Johns Hopkins and Brigham and Women’s Hospital blood banks and immunology labs. We are especially appreciative of the time and efforts of patients, blood donors, and their families who participated in this study.
Abbreviations
- ATR
allergic transfusion reaction
- TRAP
Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets
- SBP
systolic blood pressure
- LT
leukotriene
- PG
prostaglandin
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Savage WJ, Tobian AA, Fuller AK, Wood RA, King KE, Ness PM. Allergic transfusion reactions to platelets are associated more with recipient and donor factors than with product attributes. Transfusion. 2011;51:1716–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03009.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Heddle NM, Blajchman MA, Meyer RM, Lipton JH, Walker IR, Sher GD, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the frequency of acute reactions to plasma-removed platelets and prestorage WBC-reduced platelets. Transfusion. 2002;42:556–66. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vyas GN, Perkins HA, Fudenberg HH. Anaphylactoid transfusion reactions associated with anti-IgA. Lancet. 1968;2:312–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)90527-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sandler SG, Eckrich R, Malamut D, Mallory D. Hemagglutination assays for the diagnosis and prevention of IgA anaphylactic transfusion reactions. Blood. 1994;84:2031–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morishita K, Shimada E, Watanabe Y, Kimura H. Anaphylactic transfusion reactions associated with anti-haptoglobin in a patient with ahaptoglobinemia. Transfusion. 2000;40:120–1. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40010120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Westhoff CM, Sipherd BD, Wylie DE, Toalson LD. Severe anaphylactic reactions following transfusions of platelets to a patient with anti-Ch. Transfusion. 1992;32:576–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32692367205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leukocyte reduction and ultraviolet B irradiation of platelets to prevent alloimmunization and refractoriness to platelet transfusions. The Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1861–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712253372601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arnold DM, Blajchman MA, Ditomasso J, Kulczycki M, Keith PK. Passive transfer of peanut hypersensitivity by fresh frozen plasma. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:853–4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Branch DR, Gifford H. Allergic reaction to transfused cephalothin antibody. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 1979;241:495–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

