Significance
Nuclear spins are only slightly aligned even in the strong magnetic fields of superconducting magnets because the magnetic energy of nuclear spin is much smaller than thermal energy. This is the major reason for the low sensitivity of NMR spectroscopy. Using electron spins in thermal equilibrium, which have 660 times higher magnetic energy, the sensitivity can be enhanced by at most this factor through a method called dynamic nuclear polarization. Utilizing photo-excited nonthermalized electrons instead, we demonstrate an enhancement factor of 250,000 at room temperature, which can be applied to a wide range of fields including NMR, MRI, and physics.
Keywords: sensitivity enhancement, regioselective deuteration, pentacene, quantum simulation, polarized target
Abstract
Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), a means of transferring spin polarization from electrons to nuclei, can enhance the nuclear spin polarization (hence the NMR sensitivity) in bulk materials at most 660 times for 1H spins, using electron spins in thermal equilibrium as polarizing agents. By using electron spins in photo-excited triplet states instead, DNP can overcome the above limit. We demonstrate a 1H spin polarization of 34%, which gives an enhancement factor of 250,000 in 0.40 T, while maintaining a bulk sample (∼0.6 mg, ∼0.7 × 0.7 × 1 mm3) containing >1019 1H spins at room temperature. Room temperature hyperpolarization achieved with DNP using photo-excited triplet electrons has potentials to be applied to a wide range of fields, including NMR spectroscopy and MRI as well as fundamental physics.
Nuclear spin is a useful probe for noninvasive analysis of bulk materials such as chemical compounds, industrial products, biological samples, and human bodies. The signal from a spin ensemble is proportional to the polarization P. In thermal equilibrium in a magnetic field B at temperature T, P for spin-1/2 particles is given by
[1] |
where is the Planck constant, k is the Boltzmann constant, and γ is the gyromagnetic ratio. In a magnetic field of several teslas at room temperature, the nuclear spin energy is much smaller than the thermal energy kT, so nuclear spins are only slightly polarized. This is the major reason why the sensitivity of NMR spectroscopy and MRI is so low.
Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a means of transferring spin polarization from electrons to nuclei. As a method to enhance the bulk nuclear polarization, DNP has been successfully applied to areas ranging from fundamental physics (1–3) to materials science (4), biology (5–7), and medical science (8), since it was discovered 60 y ago (9, 10). As long as electron spins in thermal equilibrium are used as polarizing agents, the upper limit of the polarization enhancement is 660 for 1H spins and cryogenic temperatures of around 4.2 K are required for hyperpolarization in the order of 10% even in the strong magnetic fields used for NMR. Hyperpolarization at room temperature will simplify instrumentation and expand the sample variety to materials that prefer ambient temperatures. Other techniques such as optical pumping in semiconductors (11) and the Haupt effect (12) also require cryogenic temperature for increasing bulk polarization beyond 10%.
One solution for overcoming the upper limit of the enhancement factor of the conventional DNP, , is to use nonthermalized electron spins as polarizing agents. A number of organic molecules have photo-excited triplet states where, due to the selection rule in the intersystem crossing from the excited singlet state to the triplet state, the population distribution is highly biased. DNP using electron spins in the photo-excited triplet state can achieve hyperpolarization independent of the magnetic field strength and temperature (13–16). In this work, we have achieved a bulk hyperpolarization of 34% and corresponding to 250,000 times enhancement in 0.40 T at room temperature with the following procedure.
The procedure, developed by Henstra et al. (13), begins with shining a pulsed laser to excite the polarizing agents, e.g., a pentacene dopant in the sample. The energy diagram is shown in Fig. 1A. The hyperpolarization in the photo-excited triplet state is transferred to nuclear spins in the vicinity during the triplet lifetime by a pulsed DNP process, the integrated solid effect (ISE) (13). In the process, the field sweep and microwave irradiation near the transition frequency between the triplet sublevels are simultaneously applied, as shown in Fig. 1B. The inhomogeneously broadened electron spin packets are adiabatically swept over, and the effective nutation frequency of the electron spins in the rotating frame is matched with the 1H spin Larmor frequency at some point of the adiabatic process. The photo-excited triplet state decays nonradiatively to the ground singlet state. The hyperpolarized spin state diffuses from the nuclear spins in the vicinity of the polarizing agent to the whole sample. This sequence can be repeated to accumulate nuclear spin polarization until the buildup and the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation reach steady state. In ref. 13, at room temperature in 0.35 T, the polarization of 1H spins was increased to 0.66%, which gave an enhancement factor of 5,500 in a single crystal of naphthalene doped with 0.01 mol% pentacene.
We adopted p-terphenyl as a host material instead of naphthalene, because it does not sublimate at room temperature. To the best of our knowledge, until now the highest enhancement factor at room temperature was 13,000 in 0.3 T with a 1H spin polarization of 1.3%. This was achieved with a p-terphenyl host material (19). We did the DNP experiments in 0.40 T at room temperature. In Fig. 2 ThPh shows the buildup curve of 1H spin polarization in a single crystal of p-terphenyl-h14 doped with pentacene-h14, 0.05 mol%. By carefully optimizing the ISE parameters and avoiding sample heating, we attained a 1H spin polarization of 14% (see SI Text for experimental details, the polarization transfer mechanism, and the method to determine the polarization).
The key breakthrough in the present work to attain higher polarization at room temperature is partial deuteration of the sample. Our purpose is suppression of spin-lattice relaxation, whereas the technique blending fully deuterated molecules in the host matrix often used in conventional DNP is for decreasing the number of spins in the host matrix when spins of interest are sparsely distributed in the sample (6). In practice, the attainable 1H polarization is limited by the 1H spin-lattice relaxation time. The spin-lattice relaxation time of the 1H spins in the p-terphenyl-h14 host crystal, , was 11 min at room temperature. The 1H spin-lattice relaxation was mainly due to the pendulum motion of the central benzene ring, which modulates the local dipolar field of the 1H spins in and near the central ring (20). To suppress the spin-lattice relaxation, we synthesized regioselectively deuterated p-terphenyl-2′,3′,5′,6′-d4 (Fig. 1C) (see SI Text for details of organic synthesis). of the regioselectively deuterated sample with the deuteration ratio 4/14 = 28.6% is four times longer than the nondeuterated sample, whereas of the sample blending 30% fully deuterated p-terphenyl-d14 and 70% nondeuterated p-terphenyl-h14 remains almost the same as the nondeuterated sample (21). Therefore, was increased owing to the regioselective deuteration. The attainable polarization was increased to 16% in the regioselectively deuterated host doped with pentacene-h14 (TdPh in Fig. 2). However, the improvement was disappointing.
There is another source of 1H spin-lattice relaxation that affects DNP. We noticed that the triplet electrons play the role of polarizing agent as well as contribute to spin-lattice relaxation of the 1H spins in the vicinities through a perturbation of the local field of the 1H spins. In the case of photo-excited triplet electrons, the effect of the spin-lattice relaxation of the vicinities is propagated to the whole sample because of the absence of the so-called spin diffusion barrier. The 1H spin-lattice relaxation time attributed to the triplet electrons, defined as , can be estimated using , where is the measured 1H spin-lattice relaxation time under the pulsed laser irradiation without microwave irradiation (Table 1). By deuteration of the pentacene, can be increased by a factor of ca. 1.6. The deuteration of triplet molecules was already reported (22, 23). However, the purpose was to clarify the polarization transfer mechanism in refs. 22–24. Although the interactions between the triplet electrons and the surrounding 1H spins are weakened in the sample with the deuterated pentacene, a polarization transfer efficiency comparable to that in a sample with pentacene-h14 can be obtained for a longer ISE duration, as also reported in ref. 23. In fact, by using p-terphenyl-h14 doped with pentacene-d14 (ThPd in Fig. 2), the initial gradient of the buildup curve, , was almost the same as ThPh, as shown in Table 1. The attainable polarization was increased to 18%. Again the improvement was disappointing.
Table 1.
Sample* | τ | |||||
Unit | min | min | min | %/min | % | min |
ThPh | 11 | 6.0 | 13.2 | 5.8 | 14 | 2.4 |
TdPh | 37 | 10.6 | 14.9 | 5.5 | 16 | 2.9 |
ThPd | 11 | 7.3 | 21.7 | 5.5 | 18 | 3.3 |
TdPd | 37 | 18.9 | 38.6 | 5.5 | 34 | 6.2 |
The denotation is the same as in Fig. 2.
The relaxation times and were measured with and without the pulsed laser irradiation at the repetition rate of 50 Hz, respectively. is the electron contribution in . The initial gradient of the polarization buildup curve, fitted by , was calculated by .
Suppressing either of the two relaxation sources was not enough. What if a method of suppressing both of them was established? By using p-terphenyl-2′,3′,5′,6′-d4 doped with pentacene-d14 (TdPd in Fig. 2), we achieved a bulk 1H spin polarization of 34% at room temperature in 0.40 T, which gives an enhancement factor of 250,000, much larger than 13,000 that was previously reported for DNP using electron spins in photo-excited triplet states at room temperature (19) and far larger than 660, the upper limit of the conventional DNP using electron spins in thermal equilibrium. The achieved transfer efficiency, ∼47%, of electron spin polarization to nuclear spins was nontrivial because the theoretical limit of the efficiency of the Overhauser effect is 50% and the efficiencies in most biological studies using solid effect and thermal mixing are less than 50%. The achieved 1H spin polarization of 34% means that two-thirds of the >1019 1H spins contained in the bulk sample can be aligned in the same direction. The 13C cross-polarization (CP) spectrum of the hyperpolarized sample, shown in Fig. 3, provides further evidence of such a high polarization. The spectrum is split by the dipolar interaction with the nearest-neighbor 1H spin and each peak height represents the population of the 1H spin state. Sufficiently long DNP makes the asymmetrical character of the doublet spectrum very clear. The polarization determined from the asymmetry is 34% (1, 25, 26), which agrees with the polarization calculated from the comparison of the intensities of the hyperpolarized and thermal signals (details in SI Text).
Room temperature hyperpolarization techniques using photo-excited triplet electrons simplify DNP experiments and have the potential to be applied to a wide range of fields. The polarization of 34% is 8,500 times higher than the thermal polarization of 1H spins in 11.7 T at room temperature. NMR sensitivity of samples that prefer ambient temperatures can be boosted significantly. Using photo-excited triplet electrons can increase the DNP enhancement factor in a method proposed for hyperpolarizing flow liquids (27). To achieve the polarization of 34% in conventional DNP at 11.7 T, the temperature should be much lower than the liquid nitrogen temperature. The conventional DNP at cryogenic temperature needs special equipment to make it compatible with the standard high-resolution NMR spectroscopy or MRI (4–8). Using photo-excited triplet electrons, this can be simplified. The 13C CP spectrum in Fig. 3 was obtained in a homogeneous superconducting magnet of 11.7 T with our field cycling instrumentation (28), which is similar to that in ref. 5. For the applications to high-resolution NMR spectroscopy and MRI, we need additional equipment for dissolving, magic angle spinning (MAS), etc. It can be constructed more easily at room temperature because it does not require thermal insulation, temperature jump, and consideration of the temperature compatibilities of the equipment components and mechanicals. The obtained flexibility allows us to incorporate other useful techniques, e.g., speed-up of MAS (29), as well as reduces the cost. Using photo-excited triplet electrons, new or potential users who have an interest in hyperpolarization can drastically save on the initial and running costs. An extra refrigerator or cryogen is not needed for DNP. The required magnetic field is very low and X-band microwave components are much easier to handle and less expensive than millimeter-wave ones. The most expensive equipment for our experiment is the orange laser. Because pentacene can be excited by a less expensive solid-state green laser with a broad linewidth (23), the cost of hyperpolarization will decrease in the near future.
Until recently, demonstrations of DNP using photo-excited triplet electrons were limited to single crystal and polycrystalline samples (30). In the conventional DNP, a wide variety of samples have been hyperpolarized as a dopant in glassy host materials with polarizing agents (4–8). Recently, in a similar manner, we have also succeeded in polarizing molecules, e.g., 5-fluorouracil, used as antimetabolite, doped in a glassy matrix codoped with pentacene; however, this still required a temperature of 120 K (31). As discussed in ref. 31, to attain a higher polarization at a higher temperature and broaden future applications, we invite contributions from various fields of chemistry and materials science for a suitable glassy host material and polarizing agent with characteristics including high solubility, near unity spin polarization, and harmlessness. High solubility will increase the variety of samples that can be hyperpolarized with DNP. Triplet molecules with electron spin polarization near unity and glassy host materials with longer will enable higher polarizations. For applications to MRI, a study on human body-friendly triplet molecules has the potential to improve the safety, because triplet molecules have no harmful unpaired electrons whereas pentacene itself is harmful for other reasons.
We discuss the scalability of the room temperature hyperpolarization to a larger sample. The required sample volume for in vivo applications is about 40 μL for small animals. ISE efficiency does not depend on the sample volume as long as it is smaller than that of the homogeneous region of the microwave field, which was larger than 40 μL. The required laser power is, in principle, proportional to the number of pentacene molecules in the sample (details are discussed in ref. 32). The irradiated laser with the power of 500 mW is more than enough to excite the present sample doped with pentacene molecules and can excite up to pentacene molecules (15). Therefore, the laser power required to excite a 40-μL sample doped with pentacene molecules is estimated to be 4 W, most of which is converted to heat. This laser-induced heating is much larger than microwave-induced heating. The heating problem can be solved technically, e.g., by increasing the surface area of a sample. In ref. 23, a high-power laser developed for industrial use was already used in photo-excited triplet DNP and the authors achieved hyperpolarization of an 80-μL sample at 77 K.
DNP using photo-excited triplet electrons can be also applied in fundamental physics experiments. Bulk nuclear hyperpolarization in such low magnetic fields is desirable for scattering experiments with unstable nuclei, neutrons, and elementary particles (3, 33). The low entropic state of a bulk nuclear spin ensemble can be used for quantum information processing experiments: quantum sensing toward single nuclear spin detection (34–36), quantum computing (37), and studies on magnetic phase transition, which is presently a hot topic in quantum simulation (38, 39) and was previously investigated by Abragam et al. at sub-Kelvin temperatures (1).
In conclusion, by using electron spins in photo-excited triplet states, we can acquire a higher DNP enhancement factor than the conventional limit, 660, using electron spins in thermal equilibrium, while maintaining a bulk sample at room temperature. By deuteration of the polarizing agent and regioselective deuteration of the host, we have achieved the 1H spin polarization of 34%. Such a high polarization was proved by the asymmetric spectrum. The room temperature hyperpolarization technique can be applied in areas of chemistry, materials science, biology, and medical science as well as fundamental physics.
Materials and Methods
We purchased p-terphenyl and pentacene from Sigma-Aldrich. Deuterated pentacene was given to us by Kazuyuki Takeda, Kyoto University. He purchased it from Icon Isotopes. p-Terphenyl-2′,3′,5′,6′- was synthesized in the way shown in SI Text. p-Terphenyl and p-terphenyl-2′,3′,5′,6′- were purified by zone refining. Pentacene and deuterated pentacene were used without further purification. Single crystals of p-terphenyl (-2′,3′,5′,6′-) doped with ∼0.05 mol% (deuterated) pentacene were grown by the Bridgman method. They were cut into pieces with a size of ∼0.7 × 0.7 × 1 mm3 and mounted in a cylindrical cavity (TE011 mode tuned at 12.05 GHz) so that the long axis of the pentacene molecules was parallel to the static magnetic field (34, 40, 41). The total number of the spins in the sample is and the density is spins per cubic centimeter. Pentacene was excited with a flashlamp-pumped dye laser (Cynosure; LFDL-3). The pulse width and energy were 1 μs and 10 mJ. A microwave pulse with the frequency of 12.05 GHz was applied with the cavity. The width and strength of microwave pulse and the width of field sweep are summarized in SI Text. 1H NMR at 0.40 T was detected by tip pulse with the rotation angle of 3° at 17.2 MHz. We carried out DNP at the repetition rate of 50 Hz. The NMR experiments and timing control of the DNP, which are shown together with the details of the experimental setup and NMR spectra in SI Text, were programmed with an OPENCORE NMR spectrometer (42, 43). The enhancement factor was calculated by comparing the integrated intensities of the 1H NMR signal of ethanol (40.7 mg) in thermal equilibrium in 0.40 T at 300 K and the hyperpolarized signal . The polarization was calculated by
[2] |
where is the number of the 1H spins in the sample of ethanol and is that in the hyperpolarized sample. The 1H spin polarization was also determined from the ratio of the asymmetric spectrum of 13C spin, for which the field-cycling instrumentation and the NMR sequence with cross polarization are shown in SI Text.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Kazuyuki Takeda for fruitful discussions and supplying deuterated pentacene. This work was supported by The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 21102004 and the Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology. K.T. was also supported by the Global-Center Of Excellence (COE) Program of Osaka University.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. J.H.F. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1315778111/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Abragam A, Goldman M. Nuclear Magnetism: Order and Disorder. Oxford: Clarendon; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crabb DG, Meyer W. Solid polarized targets for nuclear and particle physics experiments. Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci. 1997;47:67–109. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Obertelli A, Uesaka T. Hydrogen targets for exotic-nuclei studies developed over the past 10 years. Eur Phys J A. 2011;47(9):105. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lesage A, et al. Surface enhanced NMR spectroscopy by dynamic nuclear polarization. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(44):15459–15461. doi: 10.1021/ja104771z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(18):10158–10163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maly T, et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields. J Chem Phys. 2008;128(5):052211. doi: 10.1063/1.2833582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bajaj VS, Mak-Jurkauskas ML, Belenky M, Herzfeld J, Griffin RG. Functional and shunt states of bacteriorhodopsin resolved by 250 GHz dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(23):9244–9249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900908106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gallagher FA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate. Nature. 2008;453(7197):940–943. doi: 10.1038/nature07017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Overhauser AW. Polarization of nuclei in metals. Phys Rev. 1953;92:411–415. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carver TR, Slichter CP. Polarization of nuclear spins in metals. Phys Rev. 1953;92:212–213. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meier F, Zakharchenya BP. Optical Orientation, Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences. Vol 8. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Horsewill AJ. Quantum tunneling aspects of methyl group rotation studied by NMR. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2000;35(4):359–389. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Henstra A, Lin T-S, Schmidt J, Wenckebach WTh. High dynamic nuclear-polarization at room-temperature. Chem Phys Lett. 1990;165(1):6–10. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stehlik D, Vieth HM. Pulsed Magnetic Resonance NMR, ESR and Optics. New York: Oxford Univ Press; 1992. pp. 446–477. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Takeda K, Takegoshi K, Terao T. Dynamic nuclear polarization by electron spins in the photoexcited triplet state: 1. Attainment of proton polarization of 0.7 at 105 K in naphthalene. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2004;73:2313–2318. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takeda K. Triplet State Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sloop DJ, Yu H-L, Lin T-S, Weissman SI. Electron spin echoes of a photoexcited triplet: Pentacene in p-terphenyl crystals. J Chem Phys. 1981;75:3746–3757. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ong JL, Sloop DJ, Lin TS. Deuteration effect on the spin dynamics of the photo-excited triplet-state of pentacene in p-terphenyl crystals. Chem Phys Lett. 1995;241:540–546. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iinuma M, et al. Proton polarization with p-terphenyl crystal by integrated solid effect on photoexcited triplet state. J Magn Reson. 2005;175(2):235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kohda K, Nakamura N, Chihara H. Proton magnetic relaxation study of phase transition in crystalline p-terphenyl. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1982;51:3936–3941. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kagawa A, Murokawa Y, Takeda K, Kitagawa M. Optimization of 1H spin density for dynamic nuclear polarization using photo-excited triplet electron spins. J Magn Reson. 2009;197(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.van den Heuvel DJ, Schmidt J, Wenckebach WTh. Polarizing proton spins by electron-spin locking of photo-excited triplet state molecules. Chem Phys. 1994;187:365–372. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eichhorn TR, Haag M, van den Brandt B, Hautle P, Wenckebach WTh. High proton spin polarization with DNP using the triplet state of pentacene-d14. Chem Phys Lett. 2013;555:296–299. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eichhorn TR, van den Brandt B, Hautle P, Henstra A, Wenckebach W. Dynamic nuclear polarisation via the integrated solid effect II: experiments on naphthalene-h8 doped with pentacene-d14. Mol Phys. 2013 doi: 10.1080/00268976.2013.863405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Waugh JS, Gonen O, Kuhns P. Fourier transform NMR at low temperatures. J Chem Phys. 1987;86:3816–3818. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morley GW, et al. Efficient dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98(22):220501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.220501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gitti R, et al. Solid/liquid intermolecular transfer of dynamic nuclear polarization. Enhanced flowing fluid proton NMR signals via immobilized spin labels. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:2294–2296. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kagawa A, Negoro M, Takeda K, Kitagawa M. Magnetic-field cycling instrumentation for dynamic nuclear polarization-nuclear magnetic resonance using photoexcited triplets. Rev Sci Instrum. 2009;80(4):044705. doi: 10.1063/1.3123346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nishiyama Y, et al. Very fast magic angle spinning (1)H-(14)N 2D solid-state NMR: Sub-micro-liter sample data collection in a few minutes. J Magn Reson. 2011;208(1):44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Takeda K, Takegoshi K, Terao T. Dynamic nuclear polarization by photoexcited-triplet electron spins in polycrystalline samples. Chem Phys Lett. 2001;345(1-2):166–170. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tateishi K, Negoro M, Kagawa A, Kitagawa M. Dynamic nuclear polarization with photoexcited triplet electrons in a glassy matrix. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52(50):13307–13310. doi: 10.1002/anie.201305674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Takeda K, Takegoshi K, Terao T. Zero-field electron spin resonance and theoretical studies of light penetration into single crystal and polycrystalline material doped with molecules photoexcitable to the triplet state via intersystem crossing. J Chem Phys. 2002;117:4940–4946. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haag M, van den Brandt B, Eichhorn TR, Hautle P, Wenckebach WTh. Spin filtering neutrons with a proton target dynamically polarized using photo-excited triplet states. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2012;678:91–97. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Negoro M, Tateishi K, Kagawa A, Kitagawa M. Scalable spin amplification with a gain over a hundred. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(5):050503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.050503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mamin HJ, et al. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with a nitrogen-vacancy spin sensor. Science. 2013;339(6119):557–560. doi: 10.1126/science.1231540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Staudacher T, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a (5-nanometer)3 sample volume. Science. 2013;339(6119):561–563. doi: 10.1126/science.1231675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cory DG, et al. NMR based quantum information processing: Achievements and prospects. Fortschr Phys. 2000;48:875–907. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Roumpos G, Master CP, Yamamoto Y. Quantum simulation of spin ordering with nuclear spins in a solid-state lattice. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:094415. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Buluta I, Nori F. Quantum simulators. Science. 2009;326(5949):108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.1177838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rietveld HM, Maslen EN, Clews CJB. An X-ray and neutron diffraction refinement of the structure of p-terphenyl. Acta Crystallogr. 1970;26:693–706. [Google Scholar]
- 41.van Strien AJ, Schmidt J. An EPR study of the triplet state of pentacene by electron spin-echo techniques and laser flash excitation. Chem Phys Lett. 1980;70:513–517. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Takeda K. A highly integrated FPGA-based nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;78(3):033103. doi: 10.1063/1.2712940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Takeda K. OPENCORE NMR: Open-source core modules for implementing an integrated FPGA-based NMR spectrometer. J Magn Reson. 2008;192(2):218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.