Abstract
There are more than two million new cases of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) diagnosed each year in the United States. The clear etiological factor is chronic exposure to solar radiation from the sun. The wavelengths of solar light that reach the earth’s surface include UVB (280-320nm) which accounts for 1-10% and UVA (320-400nm) which accounts for 90-99% of the radiation. While most of the published research has focused on the effects of UVB, little is known concerning UVA-mediated signal transduction pathways and their role in skin tumor promotion and progression giving rise to squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Here we have focused on UVA-mediated activation of p38 MAP kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and their roles in activator protein-1 (AP-1) mediated transcription, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and Bcl-XL expression. Since p38 MAP kinase and JNK play major roles in the expression of UVA-induced AP-1, COX-2 and Bcl-XL, pharmacological inhibitors of these kinases may be useful in the chemoprevention of SCC skin cancer.
1. Introduction
According to American Cancer Society, skin cancer is the most common cancer, accounting for about half of all cancers in the United States. Skin cancer is classified as melanoma (4% of total cases) and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs, 96% of total cases). NMSCs is further divided into basal-cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous-cell carcinomas (SCCs), accounting for 80% and 16% of skin cancers respectively 1, 2. BCC and SCC are both derived from the basal layer of the epidermis of the skin, but whereas BCCs are slow growing and rarely metastasize, SCCs can be highly invasive and can metastasize 1.
It is estimated that there are more than two million NMSC cases in the US each year 3, 4. Although typically not lethal, NMSCs are responsible for tissue deformity and substantial morbidity, particularly in high-risk populations, such as people with light skin or with organ transplantation. The direct cost for treatment of NMSCs in the United States was estimated to be $1.5 billion in 2004 5. Besides, actinic keratosis (AK) is also considered as an early stage of invasive SCC and carcinoma in situ. If AK is included, the direct cost would increase to more than $2.3 billion 5. The incidence of NMSCs continues to rise in recent years. This trend is in sharp contrast to most other malignancies which in general are declining 3, 4, 6. A plausible explanation for this trend is that exposure to ultraviolet irradiation (UVR) from sunlight has increased, due to the gradual depletion of the ozone layer in the past decades. Thus, it is critical to better understand the mechanisms and development of NMSCs for better prevention and treatment.
The UV irradiation of sunlight is subdivided based on wavelength: UVA (320–400 nm), UVB (280–320 nm) and UVC (200–280 nm). As UVC is shielded by the ozone layer, only UVA (90-99%) and UVB (1-10%) wavelengths can reach the earth’s surface. Although UVA has less energy than UVB, it constitutes the vast majority of UV irradiation from sunlight and penetrates deeper in human skin than UVB 7.
Mounting evidence has clearly shown that UVA irradiation causes DNA lesions through both direct and indirect mechanisms. It is believed that the primary genotoxic effect of UVA results from generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical, with singlet oxygen as the major ROS species. The ROS in turn, causes oxidative damage of macromolecules including DNA and cellular structures, e.g. gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) in normal human keratinocytes 8. However, a study published by Mouret et al challenged the above notion 9. They found that in UVA exposed human skin, the predominant DNA lesion is cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), which are products of direct photosensitization. Overall, UVA is able to cause genomic instability, i.e. mutations of oncogenes and tumor suppressors. For example, p53 is the most extensively studied example for UVA induced gene mutation. Huang et al. demonstrated that the predominant mutation induced by UVA is A:T>C:G transversions in p53 gene in EHS (engineered human skin) 10. p53 loss-of-function/mutations have been associated with 60% of cancers. Likewise, another tumor suppressor, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10) was also found to be downregulated in HaCaT cells treated with chronic UVA exposure 11 and in heterozygous PTEN knockout mice 12. The carcinogenicity of UVA has been demonstrated in cultured cells which acquired resistance to apoptosis and became transformed upon chronic exposure to low dose of UVA 11. Importantly, various mouse models have clearly demonstrated that UVA alone can induce papillomas and SCC in vivo12-14. These results highlighted the notion that UVA is also a complete carcinogen as is UVB.
2. Signaling Pathways Activated by UVA in Human Kertinocytes
2.1 Activation of p38 MAP Kinase
2.1.1 Expression of p38 in Skin
Key events in UV mediated skin carcinogenesis are related to cell survival and/or apoptosis, critical steps for cells bearing mutations to survive and later on spread the mutation through clonal expansion 15-17. Our laboratory has been focusing on UVA mediated cell survival as well as apoptosis. In dissecting the mechanisms of UVA-mediated skin carcinogenesis, our laboratory has identified that activation of MAP kinase pathways, i.e. p38 MAP kinase and JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) pathway, as key events in UVA responses. These two pathways are known to be activated by cellular stresses, through typical modules consisting of three tiers of kinases: MAPK kinase kinases (MKKKs), MAPK kinases (MKKs) and MAPKs 18, 19.
p38 MAP kinase is activated by the upstream dual specific MKKs, primarily MKK3 and MKK6, which phosphorylate a conserved Thr–X–Tyr motif in the activation loop (T180 and Y182 in p38α) 18, 19. Upon activation, p38 migrates into the nucleus and phosphorylates its downstream targets including, MAPKAP2 (MK2), MNK1 and 2, ATF1/2/6, Elk-1, GADD153, p53, and MSK1/2, which are involved in stress response and cell survival 19.
There are four p38 isoforms of p38 identified up to date: p38α (MAPK14), p38β (MAPK11), p38γ (MAPK13) and p38δ (MAPK12), with p38α is the most dominant isoform (commonly referred to as p38). Although these isoforms are homologous, they differ in several aspects: tissue specific expression, substrates, sensitivity to pyridinyl imidazole inhibitors (e.g. SB203580) and functions. For example, the expression of p38α and p38β isoforms is ubiquitous while p38δ isoform is also expressed in many tissues. p38γ, however, is mainly expressed in skeletal muscles 19, 20.
In skin, only the p38α, p38β and 38δ isoforms are detected while p38γ is absent21. It has been concluded that p38α and p38β are important for stress response and inflammation in skin and p38δ plays a critical role in the differentiation of keratinocytes22.
2.1.2 ROS Activates p38 MAP Kinase
2.1.2.1 Activation of p38 by ASK1 Kinase
Considerable published data demonstrated that ROS production leads to activation of p38 MAP kinase 8, 23-26. There is evidence indicating that ROS induces p38 MAP kinase activation through ASK1 (apoptosis signal regulated kinase-1), a MAPK kinase kinase (MKKK) 26. This protein kinase is activated by oligomerization and phosphorylation. In untreated cells, thiol-disulphide oxidoreductase thioredoxin-1 (Trx1) covalently binds to ASK1 and inhibits its activity. However, upon H2O2 treatment, ASK1 is rapidly activated through dissociation from Trx1 and multimerization by forming interchain disulfide bonds 27.
2.1.2.2 Activation of p38 through Inhibition of Phosphatases
Activity of MAP kinases depends upon the balance between upstream kinases and phosphatases 20. For example, MEF cells lack DUSP1/MKP1 showed sustained activation of p38 and JNK upon 30 J/m2 UVC irradiation 28. There are ten MKPs (mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatases) that have been shown to counteract MAPK activities by dephosphorylating their phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine residues within the Thr-X-Tyr activation motif at the same time 29. For this reason, these MKPs are classified as DUSPs (dual-specificity phosphatases) that belong to the PTP (protein tyrosine phosphatase) family 29, 30. Each of these MKPs has relative specificity for its substrates. For instance, MKP1 (DUSP1) has a substrate preference as follows: JNK > p38 >> ERK1/2 29. MKPs also have different subcellular distribution, e.g. MKP1 (DUSP1) and MKP2 (DUSP4) are primarily nuclear while MKP3 (DUSP6) is cytoplamsmic 30.
Compelling evidence has shown that PTPs are subject to inactivation by ROS 28,31-33. PTP1B is well characterized for this mechanism. It turned out that the cysteine at the catalytic center is nucleophilic and easily oxidized to form cysteine sulfenic acid intermediates, (Cys-SOH) and sulphenyl-amide, leading to significant change of conformation and loss of substrate binding capacity 31, 33. The activity can be restored by reducing agents or scavenging ROS by Trx-dependent reductases 32.
Since the PTP family members are all cysteine-based 31, ROS may inactivate the whole family through a similar mechanism. Indeed, inhibition of MKP1, MKP3, MKP5 and MKP7 was reported in mouse fibroblast cells treated with H2O232. Gross et al showed that UVC (2 kJ/m2) caused a 7-fold decrease in PTP activity in TRMP cells 34. Similarly, Xu et al found that 50 mJ/cm2 of UVC causes significant oxidization of RPTP-κ (receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase κ), leading to a 60% reduction of its activity in primary human keratinocytes. Moreover, this inhibition can be reversed by the reducing agent, DTT 35.
2.1.3 Activation of p38 by DNA Damage Pathway
As mentioned earlier, UVA causes DNA damage both directly and indirectly. In recent years, it is also found that p38 MAP kinase is implicated in DNA damage response caused by UV or DNA damaging drugs, e.g. cisplatin and doxorubicin 36-38. In these reports, DNA lesions trigger activation ATM (Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia) kinases which inactivate Cdc25 to halt the cell cycle progress and to initiate DNA damage repair mechanisms. ATM activates Chk2 and ATR activates Chk1 through phosphorylation. Chk1 and Chk2 in turn halt the cell cycle progress through inactivating Cdc25 phosphatase family 38, 39. Interestingly, p38MAPK/MK2 activation in response to UVC was shown to be independent of ATM and ATR, suggesting that UV likely causes cellular lesions other than DNA damage that result in p38MAPK activation 37, 38. The role that p38 MAP kinase plays in DNA damage response is dependent on MAPKAP kinase -2 (MK2), since knockdown MK2 by siRNA eliminated the checkpoint function conferred by p38 36. MK2 knockdown also decreased cell survival rate when the cells were challenged with low to moderate doses of UVC (5-50J/m2) 36, consistent with the anti-apoptotic role played by p38. Moreover, in the absence of p53, cells depend on p38MAPK/MK2 for cell-cycle arrest and survival after DNA damage. In p53−/− MEF cells, MK2 knockdown by shRNA led to checkpoint defect and mitotic catastrophe 37. This finding is important for skin carcinogenesis since loss of p53 is an early event associated with tumor initiation.
2.2 MK2 Is a Critical Player Downstream of p38 in Skin
Recently, MK2 has been clearly demonstrated to play a critical role in skin carcinogenesis in mice treated with DMBA/TPA 40. The onset of papillomas was 8 weeks after the start of TPA treatment in the wild-type C57BL/6 mice, whereas papillomas were not found in the MK2 K/O mice until 12 weeks. At week 18, 93% of the wild type mice developed papillomas with an average of 5.4 per mouse. In contrast, only 7% of the K/O mice developed one papilloma, indicating that MK2 is required for the development of skin tumor 40.
We and others have demonstrated that UVA irradiation activates p38 MAP kinase in multiple cell types treated with different UVA dose levels. It has been found that p38 MAP kinase is activated in JB6 cells (mouse epidermal) with UVA at 160 kJ/m241. Similarly, activation of p38 reaches maximum within 15-30 minutes in human skin fibroblasts irradiated with 300 kJ/m2 UVA 42. In immortalized human keratinocytes (HaCaT), our laboratory also observed that p38 is activated within 5 minutes with the peak between 30 – 45 minutes in response to 250 kJ/m2 UVA 43, 44. In synergizing with arsenite, dose levels as low as 10 kJ/m2 UVA can boost p38 activation dramatically in HaCaT cells 45.
2.3 Anti-apoptotic Role of p38 Activation
Activated p38 MAP kinase has a broad range of substrates that are implicated in multiple biological processes including protein and mRNA degradation, cytoskeleton organization, endocytosis, cell migration 19, 20. It is also implicated in apoptosis with either pro- or anti-apoptotic effect. For example, UVB promotes apoptosis in human keratinocytes by inducing Bax translocation to the mitochondria and cytochrome c release. However, this apoptotic response can be blocked by inhibition of p38 MAPK with either dominant negative p38 or SB203580 in HaCaT cells 46. Furthermore, p38 is also critical to induce Noxa, a BH-3 only pro-apoptotic molecule which is indispensible for UVB induced apoptosis in NHK cells 47. Consistently, inhibition of p38 with SB202190 significantly reduces sunburn cells and subcorneal pustules in the mouse skin with acute UVB irradiation 48. These data indicate that p38 plays a pro-apoptotic role in keratinocytes.
Our laboratory demonstrated that p38 plays an anti-apoptotic function in HaCaT cells, because inhibition of p38 with 2 μM of SB202190 leads to extensive apoptosis in UVA irradiated cells 49. These cells showed typical apoptotic features, e.g. condensed chromatin, nuclear fragmentation and apoptotic body formation, release of cytochrome c, and cleavages of caspases 49. Possible explanations for these controversial data may include differential responses to UVA and UVB, and dependence upon p53 since HaCaT cells bear a nonfunctional version of p53 7, 16.
2.3.1 p38 Activation Increases Bcl-XL Expression through Stabilizing mRNA
Our laboratory set out to unravel the mechanism(s) by which p38 enhances the survival of HaCaT irradiated with UVA. Consistent with the data published by others, we found that two cancer related genes, COX-2 and Bcl-XL, were upregulated in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells 44, 50, 51;49, 52. Notably, expression of both genes is dependent upon activation of p38, since inhibition of p38 with SB202190 abolishes their induction in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells 44, 49.
We further explored the mechanism by which UVA upregulates Bcl-XL gene expression through p38 MAP kinase. It turns out that p38, upon activation, stabilizes Bcl-XL mRNA 49, 52. Bcl-XL mRNA contains a relatively long 3′-UTR, which possesses three canonical ARE (AU-rich) elements. The ARE elements can recruit RNA binding proteins that will either stabilize or destabilize mRNA molecules depending upon cellular context 53. We also demonstrated that UVA irradiation increases the reporter activity in cells transiently transfected with the pRL-TK harboring Bcl-XL 3′-UTR downstream of Renilla luciferase 49. The induction of the reporter activity was abolished when the cells were cotransfected with a dominant-negative p38 MAP kinase. Our findings strongly support the notion that UVA stabilization of Bcl-XL mRNA depends upon the 3′-UTR and is regulated by p38 MAP kinase 49.
Published evidence has shown that mRNA 3′-UTRs confer stability through their interactions with different RNA binding proteins and microRNAs 54, 55. Therefore, we tried to identify possible RNA binding proteins that may stabilize Bcl-XL mRNA in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells with a proteomic approach. One such protein identified was nucleolin, a ubiquitously expressed protein participating in numerous biological functions, e.g. ribosomal biogenesis, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis 56. Nucleolin has been implicated in stabilizing multiple mRNAs including p53, IL-2, GADD45 and Bcl-257-59. We demonstrated that nucleolin specifically binds to the Bcl-Xl 3′-UTR and stabilizes Bcl-XL mRNA 52. Moreover, nucleolin interacts with PABP (poly(A) binding protein) through its RGG (Arginine-Glycine-Glycine) motif. Although the mechanism of how nucleolin stabilizes Bcl-XL mRNA is not clear, it is possible that p38 directly phosphorylates nucleolin 60, changing its subcellular localization or binding properties. Consequently, nucleolin may stabilizing Bcl-XL mRNA through its interaction with PABP to protect the poly(A) tail and to facilitate the mRNA molecule to form a closed-loop structure 52.
2.3.2 Activation of p38 Upregulates Cox-2
COX-2 is another cancer-related gene upregulated by p38 MAP kinase. We found that p38 also increases COX-2 mRNA abundance through a similar stabilization mechanism discussed above 44. Several lines of evidence suggest that p38 stabilizes COX-2 mRNA in a 3′-UTR dependent manner upon UVA irradiation. p38 MAP kinase has been shown to play a role stabilizing various mRNA molecules through regulating RNA binding proteins and altering their binding to 3′-UTRs in other cell types 61. COX-2 mRNA possess a very long 3′-UTR with multiple ARE elements which confer a stabilization effect in a p38 dependent manner 62. Consistently, we found that inhibition of p38 by SB202190 also reduces the activity of COX-2 3′-UTR reporters in UVA treated HaCaT cells 44.
It is possible that mRNA stabilization is dependent upon activation of MAPKAP kinase-2 (MK2) 62, which confers p38 biological functions and plays a critical role in regulating stability of numerous mRNAs 63. Indeed, phosphorylation of MK2 was observed in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells in our previous studies 43, 44. Inhibition of p38 by either dominant negative p38 or SB202190 completely blocked MK2 phosphorylation in UVA treated HaCaT cells 43, 44. Alternatively, COX-2 mRNA may be stabilized in UVA irradiated cells by binding of HuR, a conserved protein that stabilizes a number of mRNAs 64. We and others found that COX-2 mRNA was stabilized through HuR binding to the 3′-UTR using UVB irradiated HaCaT cells 65, 66. HuR is a nucleo-cytoplasm shuttling protein primarily localized in the nucleus. Upon phosphorylation by p38 at T118, it translocates into the cytoplasm and stabilizes its mRNA targets 67, 68. Since UVA irradiation activates p38, it is likely that HuR cytoplasmic localization is also enhanced in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells.
2.4 p38 MAP Kinase and Skin Carcinogenesis
The implication of p38 MAP kinase in skin carcinogenesis has been supported by multiple animal and clinical studies. For example, since p38α knockout mice are nonviable due to placenta defects and abnormal vascular development 69, 70, our laboratory constructed skin-specific transgenic mice in SKH1 background expressing dominant negative p38α to overcome this problem 71. We found that tumorigenesis was significantly inhibited in these mice 71. Importantly, aberrant activation of p38α has been regarded as a biomarker for skin carcinogenesis 72, 73.
In contrast to p38α, knockout mice of p38β 74, p38γ 75 and p38δ 76 isoforms are viable and normal. Currently, there is no report regarding skin carcinogenesis in p38β KO mice. While displaying normal skin phenotype, the p38δ knockout mice in C57BL/6 background had lower tumor incidence, multiplicity, and size in comparison with the wild type in a typical TPA/DMBA two-stage carcinogenesis assay 76, indicating that p38δ is indispensible for skin carcinogenesis. Consistently, p38δ activity is increased in human primary cutaneous SCCs 77 and HNSCC tumors 78.
2.5 Activation of JNK
JNK is also activated in response to various stress signals including ultraviolet irradiation 79. The JNK family is comprised of three members JNK1-3, encoded by MAPK8-10 genes, respectively 20. JNK1 and 2 are ubiquitously expressed whereas JNK3 is primarily expressed in brain 79. The upstream kinases for JNKs are mainly MKK4 and MKK780. The JNK family plays a critical role in proliferation, survival and differentiation 79. However, opposite results were observed dependent on the nature of stimuli, cellular context and duration of extracellular signals 20, 79.
In a previous study, we found that 250 kJ/m2 UVA irradiation induces JNK phosphorylation in 5 minutes and reaches maximum in 30 minutes in HaCaT cells, a similar pattern as p38 activation 81. Inhibition of JNK with SP600125 leads to a decrease of c-Jun phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells 81. At 125 nM, c-Jun phosphorylation was significantly reduced. Moreover, phosphorylation of c-Jun induced by UVA was only inhibited by JNK specific inhibitor SP600125, but not p38 inhibitor SB202190 81, indicating that activation of JNK is not dependent on p38 81. The importance of JNK in skin carcinogenesis was later verified by Dong’s group who showed that JNK2 is required for UVA-mediated skin carcinogenesis since knockout of JNK2 in SKH-1 hairless mice developed significantly fewer papillomas than the wild type control after DMBA treatment and 18 weeks of UVA exposure 82. Interesting, knockout of JNK1 enhances formation of papillomas 82, indicating that JNK1 and JNK2 function distinctly in the cell as illustrated in an early study 83.
2.6 Activation of AP-1
The JNK family has been shown to phosphorylate and upregulate the transcription factor AP-1 (activator protein 1) 84, which functions as a dimer and recognizes TPA-responsive elements (TREs consensus sequence 5′-TGAG/CTCA-3′) 85. AP-1 is made up of structurally and functionally related protein super families, i.e. Jun protein family (c-Jun, JunB and JunD), Fos protein family (c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1 and Fra-2), ATF (ATFa, ATF-2 and ATF-3), MAF (musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma) and JDP (JDP-1 and JDP-2) families 84, 86. Depending upon the cellular context, these family members can interact with each other through their Leucine-zipper domains and form various homodimers or heterodimers to regulate their target genes, promoting cell survival, proliferation and therefore malignant transformation 1, 86.
As a primary target of JNK, c-Jun is upregulated in both its abundance and phosphorylation in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells 81, 87. Specifically, c-Jun abundance and phosphorylation starts to rise at 15 minutes and reaches maximum at 4 hours after treatment of 250 kJ/m2 UVA. Similarly, we found that expression of other AP-1 components is also elevated in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells, e.g. c-fos, Fra-1 and Fra-2. Subsequently, EMSA experiments showed that binding of the AP-1 probe with the lysates extracted from UVA irradiated HaCaT cells is also enhanced 87. To examine if increase of c-Jun abundance and phosphorylation leads to AP-1 activation, we used the HCL14 cell line in which stably expresses luciferase reporter driven by AP-1 binding site88. We found that UVA increases AP-1 activity in HCL14 cells in both dose and time-dependent manner, with a peak activity at 250 kJ/m2 and at 4 hours, the same pattern as c-Jun protein abundance 87. We further demonstrated that JNK activation is required for cell survival in UVA irradiated HaCaT cells, since inhibition of UVA-induced JNK activity with 125 nM SP600125 in both the immortalized keratinocyte cell line HaCaT and primary human keratinocytes resulted in the cleavage of caspase 8, 9, 3 and PARP. As a result, these cells showed massive apoptotic responses as determined by morphology and flow cytometry 43. Our data showed that p38 MAP kinase was also required for AP-1 activity in UVA response 81, since inhibition of p38 by SB202190 decreased UVA induced AP-1 activity dramatically, suggesting that both pathways are required for activation of AP-1 81.
Carcinogenesis is divided into three independent stages: initiation, promotion, and progression with tumor promotion/progress as the rate-limiting steps 1. It has also been well established that AP-1 plays a causative role in skin carcinogenesis, specifically in tumor promotion and/or progression steps both in vitro and in vivo89-92. As a result, inhibition of AP-1 by TAM67 (dominant negative version of c-Jun with a deletion of its transactivation domain) blocked skin carcinogenesis induced by the complete carcinogen, UVB light 93. However, at this time we do not have similar direct evidence that AP-1 plays a functional role in UVA induced skin carcinogenesis.
3. Summary
UVA is the predominant irradiation from sunlight and causes DNA lesions and photodamage of other macromolecules. It is able to penetrate skin deeper into the basal layer of the skin where actively dividing keratinocytes reside. As a result, UVA induced DNA lesions predominately accumulate in these dividing cells which are potentially initiated cells for skin tumors 10. The causative effect of UVA in skin carcinogenesis has been well established in numerous studies. For example, chronic exposure of low dose of UVA causes malignant transformation of HaCaT cells in culture 11 and induces skin carcinogenesis in different mouse models as well as human skin 13, 14, 94, 95.
To summarize, our laboratory has delineated p38 MAP kinase and JNK pathways in the UVA response in human keratinocytes (Fig 1). UVA irradiation activates these pathways leading to resistance to apoptosis. Using dominant negative p38α transgenic mice, we showed that UVB induced skin carcinogenesis was significantly reduced in comparison to the wild type SKH-1 hairless mice 71. This result suggests the potential of p38 as a chemoprevention target in UVB and perhaps also UVA induced skin carcinogenesis. Although no data are currently available, we anticipate that pharmacologic inhibition of p38 and/or JNK would be able to inhibit UVA induced non-melanoma skin tumors (i.e. SCCs). Consistently, knockout of MK2, downstream target of p38, also significantly promotes resistance to skin carcinogenesis induced by DMBA/TPA in mice 40. These data provided the rationale for targeting p38MAP kinase pathway for chemoprevention of NMSC.
Fig 1. Scheme of UVA signaling in human keratinocytes.
UVA from sunlight can produce DNA damage through direct photodamage or generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Both DNA lesions and ROS subsequent contribute to activation of p38 MAP kinase or JNK through the MAP kinase module (boxed and shaded). Activated p38 MAP kinase phosphorylates its substrates, including MK2, which is critical for stabilization of numerous mRNA molecules, e.g. COX-2 and Bcl-XL. Meanwhile, activation of JNK promotes AP-1 activity. As a result, both p38 and JNK activation render cells more resistant to apoptosis. This critical step may lead to accumulation DNA damage and consequently, carcinogenesis. Solid arrows indicate direct interaction; Dashed arrows denote multiple steps.
Studies on UVA induced biological effects are important for at risk population(s), i.e. people with light skin and frequent exposure to sunlight, or those frequently using tanning booths (primarily UVA). In recent years, these studies have become increasingly important for organ transplantation patients who take thiopurine derived drugs, such as azathiopurine. The incidence of skin cancer, primarily SCC, has increased (50-200 fold) in these patients 96. It turned out that the product of thiopurine, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) nucleotides, incorporates into DNA and absorbs UVA primarily at 340nm, yielding singlet oxygen (1O2) in cultured human cells 97. Recently, it has been shown that UVA covalently crosslinks 6-TG in DNA and nuclear proteins, e.g. DNA repair and replication factors, blocking DNA damage replication repair mechanisms 98.
UVA can also be an important environmental hazard for some regions with arsenite contamination of drinking water, since UVA and arsenite are synergistic in inducing skin cancers in SKH1 hairless mice 99, 100. These regions include several US southwestern states (California, Nevada and Utah) and some developing countries, such as India, Bangladesh, Mexico, Chile and China 101. Given the fact that approximately 40 – 100 million people living in these regions are still consuming arsenite contaminated water101, further study is warranted to better understand UVA responses and its interaction with arsenite.
References
- 1.Bowden GT. Prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer by targeting ultraviolet-B-light signalling. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:23–35. doi: 10.1038/nrc1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rubin AI, Chen EH, Ratner D. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2262–2269. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra044151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Patel RV, Frankel A, Goldenberg G. An update on nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4:20–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cafardi JA, Shafi R, Athar M, Elmets CA. Prospects for skin cancer treatment and prevention: the potential contribution of an engineered virus. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:559–561. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, Weinstock MA, Goodman C, Faulkner E, Gould C, Gemmen E, Dall T. The burden of skin diseases: 2004 a joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marks R. An overview of skin cancers. Incidence and causation, Cancer. 1995;75:607–612. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950115)75:2+<607::aid-cncr2820751402>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.de Gruijl FR. Photocarcinogenesis: UVA vs UVB. Methods Enzymol. 2000;319:359–366. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)19035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bellei B, Mastrofrancesco A, Briganti S, Aspite N, Ale-Agha N, Sies H, Picardo M. Ultraviolet A induced modulation of gap junctional intercellular communication by P38 MAPK activation in human keratinocytes. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17:115–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mouret S, Baudouin C, Charveron M, Favier A, Cadet J, Douki T. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are predominant DNA lesions in whole human skin exposed to UVA radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13765–13770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604213103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang XX, Bernerd F, Halliday GM. Ultraviolet A within sunlight induces mutations in the epidermal basal layer of engineered human skin. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:1534–1543. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He YY, Pi J, Huang JL, Diwan BA, Waalkes MP, Chignell CF. Chronic UVA irradiation of human HaCaT keratinocytes induces malignant transformation associated with acquired apoptotic resistance. Oncogene. 2006;25:3680–3688. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ming M, Shea CR, Feng L, Soltani K, He YY. UVA Induces Lesions Resembling Seborrheic Keratoses in Mice with Keratinocyte-Specific PTEN Downregulation. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:1583–1586. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.de Laat A, van der Leun JC, de Gruijl FR. Carcinogenesis induced by UVA (365-nm) radiation: the dose-time dependence of tumor formation in hairless mice. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18:1013–1020. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.5.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Kranen HJ, de Laat A, van de Ven J, Wester PW, de Vries A, Berg RJ, van Kreijl CF, de Gruijl FR. Low incidence of p53 mutations in UVA (365-nm)-induced skin tumors in hairless mice. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1238–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Gruijl FR. p53 mutations as a marker of skin cancer risk: comparison of UVA and UVB effects. Exp Dermatol. 2002;11(Suppl 1):37–39. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.11.s.1.9.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Kranen HJ, de Gruijl FR. Mutations in cancer genes of UV-induced skin tumors of hairless mice. J Epidemiol. 1999;9:S58–65. doi: 10.2188/jea.9.6sup_58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cuenda A, Rousseau S. p38 MAP-kinases pathway regulation, function and role in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773:1358–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cuadrado A, Nebreda AR. Mechanisms and functions of p38 MAPK signalling. Biochem J. 2010;429:403–417. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wagner EF, Nebreda AR. Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:537–549. doi: 10.1038/nrc2694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Johansen C, Kragballe K, Westergaard M, Henningsen J, Kristiansen K, Iversen L. The mitogen-activated protein kinases p38 and ERK1/2 are increased in lesional psoriatic skin. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:37–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Eckert RL, Efimova T, Balasubramanian S, Crish JF, Bone F, Dashti S. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinases on the body surface--a function for p38 delta. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:823–828. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Finkel T. Oxygen radicals and signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:248–253. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80147-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kulisz A, Chen N, Chandel NS, Shao Z, Schumacker PT. Mitochondrial ROS initiate phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase during hypoxia in cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;282:L1324–1329. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00326.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Heusch P, Canton M, Aker S, van de Sand A, Konietzka I, Rassaf T, Menazza S, Brodde OE, Di Lisa F, Heusch G, Schulz R. The contribution of reactive oxygen species and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase to myofilament oxidation and progression of heart failure in rabbits. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1408–1416. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00793.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dolado I, Swat A, Ajenjo N, De Vita G, Cuadrado A, Nebreda AR. p38alpha MAP kinase as a sensor of reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:191–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nadeau PJ, Charette SJ, Toledano MB, Landry J. Disulfide Bond-mediated multimerization of Ask1 and its reduction by thioredoxin-1 regulate H(2)O(2)-induced c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase activation and apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:3903–3913. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-05-0491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Staples CJ, Owens DM, Maier JV, Cato AC, Keyse SM. Cross-talk between the p38alpha and JNK MAPK pathways mediated by MAP kinase phosphatase-1 determines cellular sensitivity to UV radiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:25928–25940. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.117911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Owens DM, Keyse SM. Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene. 2007;26:3203–3213. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Patterson KI, Brummer T, O’Brien PM, Daly RJ. Dual-specificity phosphatases: critical regulators with diverse cellular targets. Biochem J. 2009;418:475–489. doi: 10.1042/bj20082234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Denu JM, Tanner KG. Specific and reversible inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases by hydrogen peroxide: evidence for a sulfenic acid intermediate and implications for redox regulation. Biochemistry. 1998;37:5633–5642. doi: 10.1021/bi973035t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kamata H, Honda S, Maeda S, Chang L, Hirata H, Karin M. Reactive oxygen species promote TNFalpha-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases. Cell. 2005;120:649–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Salmeen A, Andersen JN, Myers MP, Meng TC, Hinks JA, Tonks NK, Barford D. Redox regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B involves a sulphenyl-amide intermediate. Nature. 2003;423:769–773. doi: 10.1038/nature01680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gross S, Knebel A, Tenev T, Neininger A, Gaestel M, Herrlich P, Bohmer FD. Inactivation of protein-tyrosine phosphatases as mechanism of UV-induced signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:26378–26386. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.37.26378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu Y, Shao Y, Voorhees JJ, Fisher GJ. Oxidative inhibition of receptor-type protein-tyrosine phosphatase kappa by ultraviolet irradiation activates epidermal growth factor receptor in human keratinocytes. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:27389–27397. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602355200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Manke IA, Nguyen A, Lim D, Stewart MQ, Elia AE, Yaffe MB. MAPKAP kinase-2 is a cell cycle checkpoint kinase that regulates the G2/M transition and S phase progression in response to UV irradiation. Mol Cell. 2005;17:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reinhardt HC, Aslanian AS, Lees JA, Yaffe MB. p53-deficient cells rely on ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reinhardt HC, Yaffe MB. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou BB, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature. 2000;408:433–439. doi: 10.1038/35044005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Johansen C, Vestergaard C, Kragballe K, Kollias G, Gaestel M, Iversen L. MK2 regulates the early stages of skin tumor promotion. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:2100–2108. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang Y, Zhong S, Dong Z, Chen N, Bode AM, Ma W. UVA induces Ser381 phosphorylation of p90RSK/MAPKAP-K1 via ERK and JNK pathways. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14572–14580. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004615200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klotz LO, Pellieux C, Briviba K, Pierlot C, Aubry JM, Sies H. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38-, JNK-, ERK-) activation pattern induced by extracellular and intracellular singlet oxygen and UVA. Eur J Biochem. 1999;260:917–922. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Silvers AL, Finch JS, Bowden GT. Inhibition of UVA-induced c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity results in caspase-dependent apoptosis in human keratinocytes. Photochem Photobiol. 2006;82:423–431. doi: 10.1562/2005-08-26-RA-659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bachelor MA, Silvers AL, Bowden GT. The role of p38 in UVA-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the human keratinocyte cell line. HaCaT, Oncogene. 2002;21:7092–7099. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cooper KL, Liu KJ, Hudson LG. Enhanced ROS production and redox signaling with combined arsenite and UVA exposure: contribution of NADPH oxidase. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:381–388. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Van Laethem A, Van Kelst S, Lippens S, Declercq W, Vandenabeele P, Janssens S, Vandenheede JR, Garmyn M, Agostinis P. Activation of p38 MAPK is required for Bax translocation to mitochondria, cytochrome c release and apoptosis induced by UVB irradiation in human keratinocytes. FASEB J. 2004;18:1946–1948. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2285fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nys K, Van Laethem A, Michiels C, Rubio N, Piette JG, Garmyn M, Agostinis P. A p38(MAPK)/HIF-1 pathway initiated by UVB irradiation is required to induce Noxa and apoptosis of human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2269–2276. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hildesheim J, Awwad RT, Fornace AJ., Jr. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor protects the epidermis against the acute damaging effects of ultraviolet irradiation by blocking apoptosis and inflammatory responses. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:497–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1747.2004.22229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bachelor MA, Bowden GT. Ultraviolet A-induced modulation of Bcl-XL by p38 MAPK in human keratinocytes: post-transcriptional regulation through the 3′-untranslated region. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:42658–42668. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406626200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mahns A, Wolber R, Stab F, Klotz LO, Sies H. Contribution of UVB and UVA to UV-dependent stimulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in artificial epidermis. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2004;3:257–262. doi: 10.1039/b309067a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Manandhar S, You A, Lee ES, Kim JA, Kwak MK. Activation of the Nrf2-antioxidant system by a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor furan-2-yl-3-pyridin-2-yl-propenone: implication in anti-inflammatory function by Nrf2 activator. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;60:879–887. doi: 10.1211/jpp.60.7.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang J, Tsaprailis G, Bowden GT. Nucleolin stabilizes Bcl-X L messenger RNA in response to UVA irradiation. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1046–1054. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Espel E. The role of the AU-rich elements of mRNAs in controlling translation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fabian MR, Sonenberg N, Filipowicz W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:351–379. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060308-103103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Houseley J, Tollervey D. The many pathways of RNA degradation. Cell. 2009;136:763–776. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Srivastava M, Pollard HB. Molecular dissection of nucleolin’s role in growth and cell proliferation: new insights. FASEB J. 1999;13:1911–1922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chen CY, Gherzi R, Andersen JS, Gaietta G, Jurchott K, Royer HD, Mann M, Karin M. Nucleolin and YB-1 are required for JNK-mediated interleukin-2 mRNA stabilization during T-cell activation. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1236–1248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sengupta TK, Bandyopadhyay S, Fernandes DJ, Spicer EK. Identification of nucleolin as an AU-rich element binding protein involved in bcl-2 mRNA stabilization. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:10855–10863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309111200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang Y, Bhatia D, Xia H, Castranova V, Shi X, Chen F. Nucleolin links to arsenic-induced stabilization of GADD45alpha mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:485–495. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yang C, Maiguel DA, Carrier F. Identification of nucleolin and nucleophosmin as genotoxic stress-responsive RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:2251–2260. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.10.2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dean JL, Sully G, Clark AR, Saklatvala J. The involvement of AU-rich element-binding proteins in p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-mediated mRNA stabilisation. Cell Signal. 2004;16:1113–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lasa M, Mahtani KR, Finch A, Brewer G, Saklatvala J, Clark AR. Regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 mRNA stability by the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 signaling cascade. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:4265–4274. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.12.4265-4274.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gaestel M. MAPKAP kinases - MKs - two’s company, three’s a crowd. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:120–130. doi: 10.1038/nrm1834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Abdelmohsen K, Lal A, Kim HH, Gorospe M. Posttranscriptional orchestration of an anti-apoptotic program by HuR. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1288–1292. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.11.4299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang J, Bowden GT. UVB irradiation regulates Cox-2 mRNA stability through AMPK and HuR in human keratinocytes. Mol Carcinog. 2008;47:974–983. doi: 10.1002/mc.20450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fernau NS, Fugmann D, Leyendecker M, Reimann K, Grether-Beck S, Galban S, Ale-Agha N, Krutmann J, Klotz LO. Role of HuR and p38MAPK in ultraviolet B-induced post-transcriptional regulation of COX-2 expression in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:3896–3904. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.081430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Farooq F, Balabanian S, Liu X, Holcik M, MacKenzie A. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase stabilizes SMN mRNA through RNA binding protein HuR. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:4035–4045. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lafarga V, Cuadrado A, Lopez de Silanes I, Bengoechea R, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nebreda AR. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase- and HuR-dependent stabilization of p21(Cip1) mRNA mediates the G(1)/S checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:4341–4351. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00210-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mudgett JS, Ding J, Guh-Siesel L, Chartrain NA, Yang L, Gopal S, Shen MM. Essential role for p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase in placental angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10454–10459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.180316397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Adams RH, Porras A, Alonso G, Jones M, Vintersten K, Panelli S, Valladares A, Perez L, Klein R, Nebreda AR. Essential role of p38alpha MAP kinase in placental but not embryonic cardiovascular development. Mol Cell. 2000;6:109–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dickinson SE, Olson ER, Zhang J, Cooper SJ, Melton T, Criswell PJ, Casanova A, Dong Z, Hu C, Saboda K, Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Bowden GT. p38 MAP kinase plays a functional role in UVB-Induced mouse skin carcinogenesis. Mol Carcinog. 2011 doi: 10.1002/mc.20734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Einspahr JG, Bowden GT, Alberts DS, McKenzie N, Saboda K, Warneke J, Salasche S, Ranger-Moore J, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Nagle RB, Nickoloff BJ, Brooks C, Dong Z, Stratton SP. Cross-validation of murine UV signal transduction pathways in human skin. Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84:463–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Einspahr JG, Stratton SP, Bowden GT, Alberts DS. Chemoprevention of human skin cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;41:269–285. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00185-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Beardmore VA, Hinton HJ, Eftychi C, Apostolaki M, Armaka M, Darragh J, McIlrath J, Carr JM, Armit LJ, Clacher C, Malone L, Kollias G, Arthur JS. Generation and characterization of p38beta (MAPK11) gene-targeted mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:10454–10464. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.23.10454-10464.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sabio G, Arthur JS, Kuma Y, Peggie M, Carr J, Murray-Tait V, Centeno F, Goedert M, Morrice NA, Cuenda A. p38gamma regulates the localisation of SAP97 in the cytoskeleton by modulating its interaction with GKAP. EMBO J. 2005;24:1134–1145. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schindler EM, Hindes A, Gribben EL, Burns CJ, Yin Y, Lin MH, Owen RJ, Longmore GD, Kissling GE, Arthur JS, Efimova T. p38delta Mitogen-activated protein kinase is essential for skin tumor development in mice. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4648–4655. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Haider AS, Peters SB, Kaporis H, Cardinale I, Fei J, Ott J, Blumenberg M, Bowcock AM, Krueger JG, Carucci JA. Genomic analysis defines a cancer-specific gene expression signature for human squamous cell carcinoma and distinguishes malignant hyperproliferation from benign hyperplasia. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:869–881. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Junttila MR, Ala-Aho R, Jokilehto T, Peltonen J, Kallajoki M, Grenman R, Jaakkola P, Westermarck J, Kahari VM. p38alpha and p38delta mitogen-activated protein kinase isoforms regulate invasion and growth of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2007;26:5267–5279. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bode AM, Dong Z. The functional contrariety of JNK. Mol Carcinog. 2007;46:591–598. doi: 10.1002/mc.20348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lawler S, Fleming Y, Goedert M, Cohen P. Synergistic activation of SAPK1/JNK1 by two MAP kinase kinases in vitro. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1387–1390. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)00019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Silvers AL, Bachelor MA, Bowden GT. The role of JNK and p38 MAPK activities in UVA-induced signaling pathways leading to AP-1 activation and c-Fos expression. Neoplasia. 2003;5:319–329. doi: 10.1016/S1476-5586(03)80025-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Choi HS, Bode AM, Shim JH, Lee SY, Dong Z. c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 phosphorylates Myt1 to prevent UVA-induced skin cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:2168–2180. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01508-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sabapathy K, Hochedlinger K, Nam SY, Bauer A, Karin M, Wagner EF. Distinct roles for JNK1 and JNK2 in regulating JNK activity and c-Jun-dependent cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2004;15:713–725. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wagner EF. AP-1--Introductory remarks. Oncogene. 2001;20:2334–2335. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Angel P, Karin M. The role of Jun, Fos and the AP-1 complex in cell-proliferation and transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1072:129–157. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(91)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Eferl R, Wagner EF. AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:859–868. doi: 10.1038/nrc1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Silvers AL, Bowden GT. UVA irradiation-induced activation of activator protein-1 is correlated with induced expression of AP-1 family members in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT. Photochem Photobiol. 2002;75:302–310. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)075<0302:uiiaoa>2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chen W, Borchers AH, Dong Z, Powell MB, Bowden GT. UVB irradiation-induced activator protein-1 activation correlates with increased c-fos gene expression in a human keratinocyte cell line. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:32176–32181. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.48.32176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Domann FE, Levy JP, Birrer MJ, Bowden GT. Stable expression of a c-JUN deletion mutant in two malignant mouse epidermal cell lines blocks tumor formation in nude mice. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5:9–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Domann FE, Jr., Levy JP, Finch JS, Bowden GT. Constitutive AP-1 DNA binding and transactivating ability of malignant but not benign mouse epidermal cells. Mol Carcinog. 1994;9:61–66. doi: 10.1002/mc.2940090202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Dong Z, Birrer MJ, Watts RG, Matrisian LM, Colburn NH. Blocking of tumor promoter-induced AP-1 activity inhibits induced transformation in JB6 mouse epidermal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:609–613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.2.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Young MR, Li JJ, Rincon M, Flavell RA, Sathyanarayana BK, Hunziker R, Colburn N. Transgenic mice demonstrate AP-1 (activator protein-1) transactivation is required for tumor promotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:9827–9832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Cooper SJ, MacGowan J, Ranger-Moore J, Young MR, Colburn NH, Bowden GT. Expression of dominant negative c-jun inhibits ultraviolet B-induced squamous cell carcinoma number and size in an SKH-1 hairless mouse model. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:848–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tyrrell RM, Keyse SM. New trends in photobiology. The interaction of UVA radiation with cultured cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1990;4:349–361. doi: 10.1016/1011-1344(90)85014-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Einspahr JG, Alberts DS, Warneke JA, Bozzo P, Basye J, Grogan TM, Nelson MA, Bowden GT. Relationship of p53 mutations to epidermal cell proliferation and apoptosis in human UV-induced skin carcinogenesis. Neoplasia. 1999;1:468–475. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Claudy A. Skin cancers after organ transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1681–1691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra022137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Zhang X, Jeffs G, Ren X, O’Donovan P, Montaner B, Perrett CM, Karran P, Xu YZ. Novel DNA lesions generated by the interaction between therapeutic thiopurines and UVA light. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007;6:344–354. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gueranger Q, Kia A, Frith D, Karran P. Crosslinking of DNA repair and replication proteins to DNA in cells treated with 6-thioguanine and UVA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Rossman TG, Uddin AN, Burns FJ. Evidence that arsenite acts as a cocarcinogen in skin cancer. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:394–404. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Rossman TG, Uddin AN, Burns FJ, Bosland MC. Arsenite is a cocarcinogen with solar ultraviolet radiation for mouse skin: an animal model for arsenic carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;176:64–71. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Tseng CH. Arsenic methylation, urinary arsenic metabolites and human diseases: current perspective. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2007;25:1–22. doi: 10.1080/10590500701201695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

