Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2014 May 7;55(19):3111–3113. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.04.004

Baeyer-Villiger Rearrangement of a Substituted Pyrrole by Oxone

Joseph P Y Kao a,b,c, Sukumaran Muralidharan a,b, Peter Y Zavalij d, Steven Fletcher e,f, Fengtian Xue e,f, Gerald M Rosen a,c,e
PMCID: PMC4041875  NIHMSID: NIHMS584444  PMID: 24910476

Abstract

Pyrroloxyls have been reported to exhibit very narrow EPR spectral lines, essential for in vivo imaging. En route to pyrroloxyls, we observed an unexpected Baeyer-Villiger rearrangement, leading to loss of aromaticity and formation of a 4,5-dihydro-1H-ketopyrrole.

Keywords: pyrrole, pyrroloxyl, Vilsmeier-Haack, Baeyer-Villiger

Introduction

The advent of low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometers 1 that can detect and image paramagnetic species in animals in real time creates an urgent need to synthesize stable free radicals (so-called “spin probes”) that can report in vivo physiology (e.g., O2 concentration in various tissues). 2 Owing to their relative ease of synthetic manipulation, nitroxides are attractive as spin probes for physiological EPR spectroscopy and imaging. 3

The utility of nitroxides as EPR imaging probes has been limited by their relatively large spectral linewidth (~1 G), which impacts both imaging sensitivity and spatial resolution. In 1970, Ramasseul and Rassat4 described the synthesis of pyrroloxyls that exhibited narrow EPR spectral linewidths in deoxygenated organic solvents (linewidth of one deuterium-substituted pyrroloxyl was reported to be ~0.1 G5). In view of their remarkable narrow linewidths, we wished to investigate the potential of pyrroloxyls as in vivo EPR imaging agents. For our initial series of studies,6 we decided to prepare 2,5-di-tert-butyl-3-ethoxycarbonyl-1-pyrroloxyl 5a, using methods described by Ramasseul and Rassat.4 To our surprise, nickel peroxide oxidation of 4 afforded two products, neither of which was described by Ramasseul and Rassat: (a) 2,5-di-tert-butyl- 3-ethoxycarbonyl-4-hydroxy-1-pyrroloxyl 5b, which is readily oxidized to nonparamagnetic 7 and (b) the biradical 2,2′,5,5′-tetra(tert-butyl)-4,4′-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)-3,3′-bipyrrolyl-1,1′-dioxyl 6 (Scheme 1).6 Despite the enhanced stability of biradical 6 as compared to pyrroloxyl 5b, its dimeric nature makes it less than optimal as a contrast agent for in vivo EPR imaging. We therefore sought alternative nitroxides that might exhibit narrow EPR spectral lines. We decided to investigate the synthesis of more water-soluble analogs of the reported pyrroloxyls4 with the expectation that they would also exhibit narrow linewidths.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

a) NaOEt, b) NH2OH, c) NiO2, d) O2

Results and Discussion

Based on our earlier publication,6 it is clear that all positions on the pyrrole ring must be substituted prior to the one-electron oxidation of N–OH to N–O•. We considered that preparation of di-ester 8, followed by cyclization with hydroxylamine would afford the desired pyrrole 9 (Scheme 2). A careful review of the literature5 revealed that 9 was indeed accordingly obtained, but only in about 5% yield. In our hands, however, attempts to prepare 9 in an identical fashion were unsuccessful.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

a) Na/Et2O, b) NH2OH

An alternative approach was sought. We reasoned that since 4 can be readily prepared in reasonable yield,4,6 initial protection of the N–OH followed by the Villsmeier-Haack reaction might result in the corresponding formylpyrrole 11. Oxidation of 11, followed by removal of the protective group, should lead to 9. However, after O-benzylation of 4 to yield 10, classic Villsmeier-Haack reaction conditions7 did not result in formylation (only 10 was recovered). By optimizing reaction conditions—1 equivalent of 10 in 5 equivalents of N-methyl-N-phenylformamide/ POCl3 (solvent-free), 50°C, 3 h, followed by hydrolysis with aqueous sodium acetate—we obtained 11 in acceptable yield (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

a) Bn-Br, K2CO3, DMSO (70% yield); b) HCON(CH3)C6H5/POCl3 (47% yield). Bn = benzyl

While there are various methods for oxidizing aldehydes to acids and esters, the recent procedure of Travis, et al,. 8 wherein Oxone® was used to convert aryl aldehydes to the corresponding ethyl esters, seemed an attractive approach to pyrrole 12. One potential problem was that electron-rich molecules, such as 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, can also undergo the Baeyer-Villiger reaction, resulting in a formate ester, which upon hydrolysis leads to the corresponding phenol.8 Because pyrrole 11 is not electron-rich, we were optimistic that the mild experimental conditions described in Travis, et al.,8 might favor oxidation to the desired ester and not a Baeyer-Villiger rearrangement.

When 11 and Oxone® (2:1 molar ratio of KHSO5 to substrate) were stirred in absolute ethanol at room temperature for 16 h, no reaction occurred. When the ratio of KHSO5 to 11 was increased to 6, and the reaction was vigorously stirred at room temperature for 3 days, TLC analysis indicated the formation of a new compound. The 1H-NMR spectrum of the isolated product showed multiple resonances inconsistent with the highly symmetrical structure of 12. The X-ray crystallographic structure9 of the isolated product revealed a rearrangement of 11 by Oxone®, resulting in 13 rather than the predicted pyrrole 12 (Scheme 4). The presence of a chiral center in 13 implies the generation of stereoisomers. Indeed, 13 crystallizes as a racemate, with an asymmetric unit comprising a pair of enantiomers (Fig. 1).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

a) Oxone/EtOH (48% yield). Bn = benzyl

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Enantiomers of 13 constituting the asymmetric unit in the X-ray crystallographic structure.9

We speculated that 11 could have undergone a Baeyer-Villiger-type oxidation mediated by Oxone®, with subsequent rearrangement to 13. To gain further insight into the mechanism underlying the formation of 13, we changed experimental conditions to avoid using a protic solvent that could act as a nucleophile: reaction with 3 molar equivalents of Oxone® in DMF for 16 h at room temperature transformed 11 into a new product, 16. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 suggested the presence of a formate ester. The structure of 16 was determined by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2),10 and is seen to be the formate ester expected from Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of 11 (Scheme 5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Formate ester 16 formed from Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of 11.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

a) Oxone/DMF (65% yield). Bn = benzyl.

Oxone is an acidic triple salt comprising potassium peroxymonosulfate, potassium hydrogen sulfate, and potassium sulfate (2KHSO5·KHSO4·K2SO4). Therefore, if formate ester 16 did form in the ethanolic Oxone reaction, acid-catalyzed transesterification with ethanol could have removed the formyl group to yield a hydroxypyrrole which, in turn, could have undergone rearrangement to yield the dearomatized compound 13. To investigate this possibility, formate ester 16 was vigorously stirred with a mixture of anhydrous KHSO4 and Na2SO4 in absolute ethanol at room temperature for 40 h. The sole isolated product was hydroxypyrrole 17 (Scheme 6). Thus cleavage of the formyl group did not trigger subsequent rearrangements under acidic, non-oxidizing conditions in anhydrous ethanol. In view of the last finding, we surmise that in the presence of Oxone in ethanol, formate ester 16 and/or hydroxypyrrole 17 must undergo further oxidative dearomatization and addition to generate pyrrolinone 13.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Conditions: KHSO4, Na2SO4, EtOH (62% yield). Bn = benzyl

To our knowledge, this is the first time that a hindered and fully substituted pyrrole has undergone a Baeyer-Villiger reaction to yield a product which, in the presence of an appropriate solvent, rearranges with loss of aromaticity. Attempts to oxidize 13 to the corresponding nitroxide using typical oxidants such as m-chloroperbenzoic acid, hydrogen peroxide/sodium tungstate and dimethyldioxirane11,12 all failed, presumably owing to 13 being highly hindered.11

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health: GM056481 (JPYK) and EB 2034 (GMR). We thank Drs. Olga A. Mukhina and Gareth R. Eaton in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Denver for helpful suggestions during the writing of this manuscript.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information Detailed experimental procedures and compound characterization data are available as Supplementary Information in the online version.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Halpern HJ, Spencer DP, van Polen J, Bowman MK, Nelson AC, Dowey EM, Teicher BA. Rev Sci Instrum. 1989;60:1040. [Google Scholar]
  • 1.Halpern HJ, Bowman MK. In: EPR Imaging and In Vivo EPR. Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Ohno K, editors. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1991. pp. 45–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Halpern HJ, Yu C, Peric M, Barth E, Grdina DJ, Teicher BA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:13047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.13047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Halpern HJ, Yu C, Peric M, Barth ED, Karczmar CS, River JN, Grdina DJ, Teicher BA. Radiat Res. 1996;145:610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elas M, Williams BB, Parasca A, Mailer C, Pelizzari CA, Lewis MA, River JN, Karczmar CS, Barth ED, Halpern HJ. Magn Reson, Med. 2003;49:682. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.For a review on this topic, the reader should consult: Swartz HM, Sentjurc M, Kocherginsky N. In: Nitroxide Spin Labels. Reactions in Biology and Chemistry. Swartz HM, Kocherginsky N, editors. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1995. pp. 175–198.
  • 3.Smirmov AI, Ruuge A, Reznikov VA, Voinov MA, Grigor’ev IA. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8872. doi: 10.1021/ja048801f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gallez B, Mäder K, Swartz HM. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:694. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ramasseul A, Rassat A. Bull Soc Chim Fr. 1970;72:4330. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Radner F, Rassat A, Hervsall CJ. Acta Chem Scand. 1996;50:146. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Riplinger C, Kao JPY, Rosen GM, Kathirvelu V, Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Kutateladze A, Neese F. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:10092. doi: 10.1021/ja901150j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.White J, McGillivray G. J Org Chem. 1977;42:4248. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Travis BR, Sivakumar M, Hollist GO, Borhan B. Org Lett. 2003;5:1031. doi: 10.1021/ol0340078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosen GM, Muralidharan S, Zavalij PY, Fletcher S, Kao JPY. Acta Cryst. 2013;E69:o878. doi: 10.1107/S1600536813012282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Single-crystal structure of 16: C23H31NO5, Mr = 401.49, T = 150(2) K, triclinic, space group P1, a = 10.1671(7) Å, b = 11.1975(7) Å, c = 11.4168(7) Å, α= 66.6953(9)°, β= 65.9741(9)°, γ= 73.5494(10)°, V = 1078.68(12) Å3, Z = 2, ρcalcd = 1.236 g·cm−3, μ = 0.086 mm−1, 10680 reflections (4244 independent, Rint = 0.0146), data/restraints/parameters 4244/0/300, goodness-of-fit on F2 1.000, R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042, wR(F2) = 0.086, Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3, Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for this structure have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (Deposition number CCDC 993030).
  • 11.Keana JFW, Heo GS, Mann JS, Van Nice FL, Lex L, Prabhu VS, Ferguson G. J Org Chem. 1988;53:2268. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Birk ME. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:5519. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES