Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2014 Jun 2;9(6):e99737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099737

Correction: Books Average Previous Decade of Economic Misery

The PLOS ONE Staff
PMCID: PMC4041885

The references to “white circles” and “red circles” within the legends of Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 4 are reversed. The “white circles” describe the economic misery index and the “red circles” describe the literary misery curve. Please view Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 4 and their corrected legends here.

Figure 1. Time series of the literary misery index Inline graphic for all books calculated through WNA (red circles), versus the U.S. economic misery index Inline graphic (white circles).

Figure 1

Inline graphic has been scaled by a factor of 10 to allow a better comparison.

Figure 2. Moving average of economic misery.

Figure 2

(a) The effect of varying the moving average period, τ, versus a simple lag, on correlation expressed as Pearson's r between the time series of Inline graphic for all books of 1900–2000 and U.S. misery index (b) Time series for Inline graphic, the 11-year moving average of the U.S. misery index (white circles), versus literary misery index, Inline graphic, derived from all books calculated through WNA (red circles). Similarly to Figure 1, Inline graphic has been scaled by a factor of 10 to allow a better comparison.

Figure 4. Repeating the analysis on German economic and literary misery.

Figure 4

(a) The effect of varying the moving average period, Inline graphic, versus as a simple lag, on correlation between for German LIWC and German misery index (b) Time series of the literary misery index for all books calculated through German LIWC (red circles), versus the German economic misery index (white circles).

Reference


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES