Skip to main content
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging logoLink to Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
. 2012 Apr 21;46(2):134–137. doi: 10.1007/s13139-012-0134-z

Giant Cell Tumor Pulmonary Metastases Mimic Primary Malignant Pulmonary Nodules on 18F-FDG PET/CT

William Makis 1,, Yazan Z Alabed 2, Ayoub Nahal 3, Javier A Novales-Diaz 2, Marc Hickeson 2
PMCID: PMC4042995  PMID: 24900048

Abstract

A 59-year-old man with a 30-year history of multiple recurrences of a giant cell tumor (GCT) of the left knee was referred for an 18F-FDG PET/CT to evaluate a solitary pulmonary nodule. The nodule was mildly FDG-avid, raising suspicion of malignancy. It was excised and histologically proven to be a GCT pulmonary metastasis. A follow-up PET/CT done 2 years later revealed a new, larger lung mass that was more intensely FDG-avid, but of the same histology. This rare report highlights a pitfall in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary lesions by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with GCT of the bone.

Keywords: Giant cell tumor, GCT, Pulmonary metastases, FDG, PET/CT

Introduction

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the bone is a benign but locally aggressive tumor that accounts for 5% of all bone tumors, including 20% of benign bone tumors. It occurs most frequently in young adults between 20 and 40 years of age, with no sex predilection. About 3% of patients with benign GCTs of the bone develop pulmonary metastases [14].

Although 18F-FDG PET/CT cannot reliably differentiate a benign GCT of the bone from a malignant bone tumor, PET/CT has been used to assess GCT in very specific situations, including: the evaluation of 18F-FDG kinetics and gene expression in GCTs, detection of multifocal GCTs, and staging of sarcomatous degeneration of GCTs [510]. 18F-FDG uptake in pulmonary metastases from a benign GCT of the bone has not been previously described in the literature. We present the imaging characteristics of GCT pulmonary metastases mimicking a primary lung malignancy in a patient with a history of recurrent GCTs, as seen on initial and follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Case Report

A 59-year-old man was referred for an 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of a solitary pulmonary nodule discovered incidentally on a chest x-ray. Thirty years ago he had been treated for a benign GCT of the left distal femur with curettage and autografting. Six years ago, the tumor recurred locally and was treated with curettage, cementing and phenol. Four years ago it recurred in adjacent soft tissues of the left knee, however this time with a more aggressive histology, which was treated with distal femoral resection, prosthesis placement and two cycles of adriamycin and cisplatin chemotherapy.

An 18F-FDG PET/CT (Discovery ST, GE Healthcare, Canada) was performed. The patient fasted overnight prior to the examination and waited in a quiet, dark room the morning of the exam. Oral contrast (900 cc of barium) was administered. An 18F-FDG emission scan extending from the head to the mid-thigh was obtained 60 min after intravenous injection of 0.22 mCi/kg of 18F-FDG. A second emission scan extending from the pelvis to the feet was obtained 112 min post 18F-FDG injection. The emission scans were acquired for 5 min per field of view, each covering 14.9 cm, at an axial sampling thickness of 3.75 mm/slice. The 16-slice helical CT acquisition was performed prior to a full-ring dedicated PET scan of the same axial range. The CT component was operated with an X-ray tube voltage peak of 140 kVp, 80 mA (whole body), 70 mA (legs), a 1.75:1 pitch, a slice thickness of 3.75 mm and a rotational speed of 0.8 s/ rotation. The patient was allowed to breathe normally during the PET and CT acquisitions. PET images were reconstructed with CT-derived attenuation correction using ordered subset expectation maximization software (20 subsets, 2 iterations). Only the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was reported, corrected for body weight.

The 18F-FDG PET/CT maximum intensity projection (MIP) images (Fig. 1) showed a small mildly FDG-avid nodule in the left upper lung and mild diffuse uptake surrounding the left knee prosthesis (which was not considered suspicious). The 1-cm left upper lung nodule was located posteriorly with a SUVmax of 2.9, raising a suspicion of malignancy (Fig. 2). An excisional biopsy was performed, and the histology was consistent with a GCT pulmonary metastasis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

18F-FDG PET/CT maximum intensity projection (MIP) images with (a) anterior, (b) left lateral and (c) lower extremity views show a small, mildly FDG-avid nodule in the left upper lung (arrows), and mild FDG uptake surrounding the left knee prosthesis

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Transaxial views of the thorax with (a) CT, (b) 18F-FDG PET and (c) PET/CT fusion images show a 1-cm nodule in the left upper lung posteriorly (arrow) with SUVmax 2.9

The patient was followed regularly with CT scans of the thorax, and a follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed 2 years after the initial PET/CT to evaluate a new growing mass in the left lower lung. MIP images of the follow-up PET/CT (Fig. 3) showed a new, larger and more intensely FDG-avid mass in the left lower lung (arrow), measuring 3.5 cm × 1.5 cm with SUVmax of 4.9 (Fig. 4), again raising a strong suspicion of malignancy. This mass was excised, and histological evaluation revealed another GCT pulmonary metastasis (Fig. 5). Despite the appearance of pleural involvement, the lung metastasis was completely encased by a rim of normal lung tissue. There were no other FDG-avid abnormalities in the remainder of the scan. There was persistent mild diffuse FDG uptake surrounding the left knee prosthesis, which was unchanged compared to the previous PET/CT.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

MIP images of the follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT done 2 years after the initial PET/CT with (a) anterior, (b) left lateral and (c) lower extremity views show a new lung mass in the left lower lung posteriorly (arrow). There is mild FDG uptake surrounding the left knee prosthesis

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Transaxial views of the thorax with (a) CT, (b) 18F-FDG PET and (c) PET/CT fusion images show a 3.5 × 1.5-cm mass in the left lower lung with SUVmax 4.9

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

a Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections (×100 magnification) of the 3.5-cm lung mass identified on the follow-up PET/CT. Atypical mononuclear cells with enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli admixed with numerous osteoclast type giant cells, consistent with GCT metastasis. b Hematoxylin and eosin (×400 magnification). Highly atypical mononuclear histiocytic cells with epithelioid morphology and evidence of mitotic activity, confirming the aggressive nature of the GCT pulmonary metastasis

Discussion

GCT of the bone occurs almost exclusively at the metaphyso-epiphyseal junction. The most frequent locations include: the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal radius and sacrum. About 3% of patients with GCT of the bone develop pulmonary metastases, and the lung is known to be the most common site for metastasis. Mean age at presentation with pulmonary metastases is 30 years, males and females are affected equally, and the mean interval to developing a pulmonary metastasis is about 3.8 years. The natural history of lung metastases is unpredictable. They may show spontaneous regression, remain stable, or show slow or rapid progression [14]. Our patient developed two separate GCT pulmonary metastases over the course of 2 years.

Among benign bone tumors, GCTs show significantly elevated glucose metabolism and 18F-FDG uptake, but cannot be reliably distinguished from malignant bone tumors based on SUVmax alone [57]. In this case, the PET/CT incidentally identified a GCT pulmonary metastasis that showed mild 18F-FDG uptake. Another GCT pulmonary metastasis was identified on the follow-up PET/CT, which had grown rapidly to a 3.5-cm mass and showed more intense 18F-FDG uptake. On both PET/CT studies, the GCT pulmonary metastases raised a strong suspicion of a primary lung malignancy. The SUVmax values of both lesions (2.9 and 4.9) were above the cutoff SUVmax values of 2.0-2.5, which have been suggested in the literature to differentiate benign from malignant pulmonary nodules [1113]. The rapid appearance and growth of the second pulmonary mass only added to the suspicion of malignancy.

In conclusion, PET/CT readers should be aware that GCT pulmonary metastases can grow significantly on follow-up studies and can also show significant 18F-FDG uptake, mimicking primary malignant pulmonary lesions. This represents a potential pitfall in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules and masses by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with a prior history of GCT of the bone.

Footnotes

This is a case report. There was no financial support for this research paper.

Giant cell tumor pulmonary metastases mimic malignancy on FDG PET/CT

Makis W, Alabed YZ, Nahal A, Novales-Diaz JA, Hickeson M

References

  • 1.Turcotte RE. Giant cell tumor of bone. Orthop Clin N Am. 2006;37:35–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tubbs WS, Brown LR, Beabout JW, Rock MG, Unni KK. Benign giant-cell tumor of bone with pulmonary metastases: clinical findings and radiologic appearance of metastases in 13 cases. AJR. 1992;158:331–334. doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.2.1729794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rock MG, Pritchard DJ, Unni KK. Metastases from histologically benign giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:269–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bertoni F, Present D, Sudanese A, Baldini N, Bacchini P, Campanacci M. Giant-cell tumor of bone with pulmonary metastases. Six case reports and a review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;237:275–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schulte M, Brecht-Krauss D, Heymer B, Guhlmann A, Hartwig E, Sarkar MR, et al. Grading of tumors and tumorlike lesions of bone: evaluation by FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1695–1701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Heichel T, Wu H, Burger C, Bernd L, et al. The role of quantitative (18)F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:510–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, Takagishi K, Ishijima H, Oya N, et al. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions. Radiology. 2001;219:774–777. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma08774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Strauss LG, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Koczan D, Bernd L, Haberkorn U, Ewerbeck V, et al. 18F-FDG Kinetics and gene expression in giant cell tumors. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1528–1535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McKinney AM, Reichert P, Short J, Dhurairaj T, Santacruz K, McKinney Z, et al. Metachronous, multicentric giant cell tumor of the sphenoid bone with histologic, CT, MR imaging, and positron-emission tomography/CT correlation. AJNR. 2006;27:2199–2201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Makis W, Hickeson M. Spindle cell sarcoma degeneration of giant cell tumor of the knee, imaged with F-18 FDG PET-CT and Tc-99 m MDP bone scan. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35:112–115. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181c7c124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bryant AS, Cerfolio RJ. The maximum standardized uptake values on integrated FDG-PET/CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1016–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hashimoto Y, Tsujikawa T, Kondo C, Maki M, Momose M, Nagai A, et al. Accuracy of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:426–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hickeson M, Yun M, Matthies A, Zhuang H, Adam LE, Lacorte L, et al. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:1639–1647. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-0924-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES