Skip to main content
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging logoLink to Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
. 2012 Sep 8;46(4):316–317. doi: 10.1007/s13139-012-0169-1

Peripheral Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Masquerading as Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma on F-18 FDG Dual Time Point PET/CT

Su Kon Kim 1, Jeong Eun Shin 2, Jai Hyuen Lee 3,
PMCID: PMC4043069  PMID: 24900083

A 59-year-old woman was hospitalized with weight loss, anorexia, and low grade fever for 2 weeks. She had undergone a total gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy 10 years prior due to advanced gastric cancer. To evaluate recurrence, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dual time point positron emission tomography/computed tomography (DTPP) was conducted with a Gemini GXL 6 PET/CT system (Philips, Hamburg, Germany). FDG DTPP was performed twice, with an early scan 60 min after FDG injection and a delayed scan 150 min after FDG injection (Fig. 1a). The early scan showed that multiple hypermetabolic lesions were located along left supraclavicular, mediastinal (1R, 2R, 3, 4R and 7) and left paraaortic (retroperitoneal) nodal stations (Fig. 1b). The delayed scan showed that all the above mentioned lesions revealed a more increased maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) than was detected in the early scan. Both scans did not show intrapulmonary lesion. For example, the left supraclavicular lymph node, 2R and retroperitoneal lymph node were observed with early and delayed SUV maxes of 4.5/7.7/3.6 and 6.7/10.7/4.4, respectively. To confirm diagnosis and establish a treatment plan, a mediastinoscopic biopsy of one of the mediastinal lymph nodes (4R) was subsequently performed and tuberculosis was ultimately diagnosed. Then, the patient started an antituberculosis treatment instead of antichemotherapy (Fig. 1c). A follow-up FDG PET/CT performed 12 months later showed disappeared FDG uptake and significant decreased change of multiple peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

F-18 FDG dual time point PET/CT maximum intensity projection (MIP) images with (a) early scan and (b) delayed scan for ruling out recurrence, showing multiple systemic hypermetabolic lymph nodes. (c) Second MIP after antituberculosis treatment, demonstrating decreased metabolic change or partial disappearance of above-mentioned hypermetabolic lymph nodes

Whole-body FDG PET/CT has widespread use in diagnosing and staging variable malignancies, and plays an important role in detection of gastric cancer recurrence [1]. However, FDG is not cancer-specific and some inflammatory diseases have shown higher FDG uptake on PET imaging [2]. Infection, inflammation, and granulomatosis are also known to cause false positive FDG PET scans because activated inflammatory cells show avidity for FDG [3, 4]. So, for alternative measure differentiating malignancy from benign disease [5], early standard FDG PET/CT and delayed scan after early scan, namely FDG DTPP, has been introduced and often performed worldwide. FDG DTPP used the phenomenon that with time, FDG uptake in tumor tissues increases, while FDG uptake in normal or benign tissues decreases [5, 6]. Although FDG DTPP has been not accepted routinely, the retention index inferred from FDG DTPP predicted patient prognosis in lung cancer [7]. We had considered multiple hypermetabolic lymph nodes as metastasis rather than benign lymphadenopathies because of increased FDG uptake on the delayed scan versus the early scan, before pathologic results were confirmed. It is presumed that FDG DTPP could not help differentiate malignancy from benign diseases in cases of active infectious disease such as ongoing tuberculosis. Peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis (PTL) is a common manifestation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and remains an important cause of adenopathy globally [8, 9]. It was difficult for those lesions to be directly considered as PTL, because PTL manifestation mainly involves cervical chains and the supraclavicular region [8].

We demonstrate a rare FDG DTPP case showing PTL mimicking metastatic lymphadenopathies originated from advanced gastric cancer. Even if FDG DTPP showed increased FDG uptake on the delayed scan to be considered as suspicious metastasis, the possibility of active tuberculosis should always be kept in mind, especially in areas with epidemic granulomatous diseases.

References

  • 1.Kim DW, Park SA, Kim CG. Detecting the recurrence of gastric cancer after curative resection: comparison of FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26:875–880. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.7.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Metser U, Even-Sapir E. Increased (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in benign, nonphysiologic lesions found on whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT): accumulated data from four years of experience with PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:206–222. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cook GJ, Fogelman I, Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med. 1996;26:308–314. doi: 10.1016/S0001-2998(96)80006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bakheet SM, Powe J, Ezzat A, et al. F-18-FDG uptake in tuberculosis. Clin Nucl Med. 1998;23:739–742. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199811000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, et al. Dual time point 18 F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1412–1417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hustinx R, Smith RJ, Benard F, et al. Dual time point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neck. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:1345–1348. doi: 10.1007/s002590050593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Houseni M, Chamroonrat W, Zhuang J, et al. Prognostic implication of dual-phase PET in adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:535–542. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.068643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fontanilla JM, Barnes A, Von Reyn CF. Current diagnosis and management of peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:555–562. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Polesky A, Grove W, Bhatia G. Peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Medicine. 2005;84:350–362. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000189090.52626.7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES