Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 2004 May;11(3):532–537. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.3.532-537.2004

2F3 Monoclonal Antibody Recognizes the O26 O-Antigen Moiety of the Lipopolysaccharide of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Strain 4276

I M Szalo 1,*, B Taminiau 1, F Goffaux 1, V Pirson 1, J McCappin 2, H J Ball 2, J G Mainil 1
PMCID: PMC404561  PMID: 15138178

Abstract

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) organisms are groups of pathogenic strains whose infections are characterized by a typical lesion of enterocyte attachment and effacement. They are involved in enteric diseases both in humans and in animals, and EHEC strains can be responsible for hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans. Previously, it was shown that the 2F3 monoclonal antibody (MAb) is specific for the O26 EHEC and EPEC strains (P. Kerr, H. Ball, B. China, J. Mainil, D. Finlay, D. Pollock, I. Wilson, and D. Mackie, Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 6:610-614, 1999). As these groups of bacteria play an important role in pathology, the aim of this paper was to characterize the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb and its genetic determinant. A genomic locus containing the entire O-antigen gene cluster and half of the colanic acid gene cluster from an O26 EHEC strain was shown to be sufficient for the production of the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb in an E. coli DH5α strain. By transposon mutagenesis performed on the recombinant plasmid, all 2F3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-negative mutants had their transposons inserted into the O-antigen gene cluster. The O-antigen gene cluster was also cloned from an O26 EHEC strain into the E. coli DH5α strain, which then produced a positive result with the 2F3 MAb. Further analysis of the type of lipopolysaccharides (smooth or rough) produced by the clones and mutants and of the O antigen of the 2F3-positive clones confirmed that the epitope recognized by the 2F3 MAb is located on the O antigen in the O26 EHEC and EPEC strains and that its genetic determinant is located inside the O-antigen gene cluster.


Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) strains are an important class of pathogens for humans and animals. The term EHEC denotes E. coli strains that cause attaching and effacing lesions on epithelial cells, express Shiga toxin-encoding genes, possess a 60-MDa virulence plasmid, and produce hemorrhagic colitis and/or hemolytic uremic syndrome (17, 18).

Besides those of the O157:H7 and O157:H serotypes, EHEC strains of serogroup O26 are the most common strains found in human infections (4, 17). In addition, O26 EHEC strains are an important cause of enteritis in calves (12). One of the most important steps in the pathogenic mechanism of enteric bacteria is the initial adhesion of the bacteria to the intestinal wall. Several stages of colonization have been recognized in attaching and effacing E. coli pathogenesis, some of which await characterization. Some level of host specificity is shown by EHEC strains, but the role in host specificity of the recognized virulence factors, such as Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1) and/or Stx2 and the intimin protein (a protein that is encoded by the eae gene and necessary for the production of the attaching and effacing lesion), is unknown (8, 19). The bovine host specificity shown by O26 EHEC and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) strains could be based on the production of a colonization factor, such as an adhesin, that is specific for cattle; such a colonization factor has been demonstrated to be the basis of the host specificity of classical human EPEC strains. Such an adhesin is likely to be a specific immunogen exposed at the bacterial cell surface (3, 13, 15, 17, 23, 24).

A monoclonal antibody (MAb), 2F3, was derived against a surface antigen extracted from the bovine O26 EHEC strain 4276; it tested positive in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with all of the O26 and half of the O111 bovine and human EHEC and EPEC strains (9). Recent reexamination of six of the O111 EHEC and EPEC strains that tested positive revealed a contamination by O26 EHEC or EPEC strains. Purification of the strains in the mixed culture demonstrated that the O111 strains were 2F3 negative and the O26 strains were 2F3 positive (J. McCappin and H. Ball, unpublished data).

Since the 2F3 MAb is specific for the O26 EHEC and EPEC strains, it may not only represent a diagnostic tool of these confirmed pathogens but also recognize a factor involved in the production of the attaching and effacing lesion. In view of these results, this study was initiated (i) to characterize the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb and its genetic determinant and (ii) to reexamine the specificity of the 2F3 MAb within the O26 serogroup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and media.

The O26 EHEC strain 4276, isolated from a calf with a case of enteritis in Northern Ireland, was used to characterize the genetic basis of the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb (2f3 antigen). This strain was characterized to be eae and stx1 positive and to produce a complete lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with an O antigen belonging to the O26 serotype (9). The DH5α K-12 derivative E. coli strain was used as the host strain for the cloning and mutagenesis assays. It possesses the O-antigen (rfb) gene cluster for the production of an O16-type O antigen but produces an LPS without the O antigen and rough-type colonies on solid medium as a consequence of two independent mutations in the rfb gene cluster. The first mutation (the rfb-50 mutation) consists of an IS5 insertion at the 3′ end of the rfb gene cluster and is representative of most K-12 derivatives. The second mutation (the rfb-51 mutation) consists of a deletion at the 5′ end of the rfb gene cluster (11).

A collection of 70 O26 EPEC or EHEC strains, 7 O26 non-EPEC and non-EHEC strains, and 3 E. coli strains belonging to other serogroups were used to reexamine the specificity of the 2F3 MAb. The strains were isolated from humans or animals, either with diarrhea disease or hemolytic uremic syndrome or without clinical signs, in Europe and North America (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

E. coli strains used in this study and their 2F3 ELISA results

Strain Pathotype Serotypeb Test resulta
Source
2F3c eaed O26e
HS K-12 O9:H4 Human
E2348 EPEC O127 + Human
H511 EHEC O102 + Human
193 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
4276 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
357S89 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Cattle
379S89 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Cattle
631KH91 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
122 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
63 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
A39 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
A14 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
3953 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
C15333 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
333KH91 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
334KH91 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
351KH91 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
352KH91 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3108 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3109 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3117 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3180 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3269 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3273 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3302 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3305 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3375 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3380 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3629 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3630 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3631 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3632 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3656 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3657 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3748 EHEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC6169 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Cattle
TC659 EPEC O26:HNM + + + Cattle
TC1988 EPEC O26:HNM + + + Cattle
TC3145 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3486 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC3848 EPEC O26:H11w + + + Cattle
TC4004 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC4219 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
TC4221 EPEC O26 + + + Cattle
EH182 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
EH193 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
EH196 EHEC O26 + + + Human
EH284 EHEC O26 + + + Human
EH296 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
EH298 EHEC O26 + + + Human
EH322 EHEC O26 + + + Human
EH324 EHEC O26 + + + Human
EH31 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
TC5710 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
TC5711 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
TC6168 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
H19 EHEC O26:H11 + + + Human
TC6165 EPEC O26:H11 + + + Human
TC6166 EPEC O26:HN + + + Human
TC6167 EPEC O26:HN + + + Human
C3888 EPEC O26:H- + + + Human
C4115 EPEC O26:H- + + + Human
02/113 EHEC O26 + + + Human
99/109 EHEC O26 + + + Human
03/178 EPEC O26 + + + Human
03/151 EHEC O26 + + + Human
03/139 EHEC O26 + + + Human
99/145 EHEC O26 + + + Human
99/147 EHEC O26 + + + Human
00/054 EPEC O26 + + + Human
00/106 EPEC O26 + + + Human
00/113 EPEC O26 + + + Human
02/145 EPEC O26 + + + Human
02/057 EPEC O26 + + + Human
00/103 Non-EPEC O26 + Human
00/130 Non-EPEC O26 + Human
03/023 Non-EPEC O26 + Human
C4071 Non-EPEC O26:H32 + Human
T652 Non-EPEC O26:H28 + Pig
739 Non-EPEC O26 + Poultry
T282 Non-EPEC O26:H11 + Cattle
a

+, positive result; −, negative result.

b

According to the laboratory of origin.

c

2F3 MAb ELISA.

d

PCR multiplex assay (5).

e

Anti-O26 E. coli immune serum.

Bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C in Luria broth (LB) or Luria agar (LB with 1.5% [wt/vol] agar [Oxoid]). Media were supplemented with ampicillin at 100 μg/ml or kanamycin at 50 μg/ml (Sigma) when needed.

Construction of a DNA genomic library.

The cosmid library was obtained from the O26 E. coli strain 4276 (9) by using the Expand cloning kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Briefly, total genomic DNA, extracted with an AquaPure genomic DNA purification kit (Bio-Rad), was partially digested by serial dilution at 37°C with EcoRV (Invitrogen) in order to generate blunt-end fragments compatible with the linearized vector. Following the inactivation of the enzyme at 65°C for 15 min, fragments approximately 10, 20, and 30 kb in length were inserted into three pHC79 cosmid derivative vectors with a cloning capacity of 7.0 to 16.5, 16.5 to 25.0, and 25.0 to 36.0 kb, respectively. The constructs were packaged into a lambda bacteriophage and then transfected into a DH5α E. coli magnesium culture, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transformants were selected on LB plates containing ampicillin, and the 2f3 antigen-positive clones were identified by an ELISA.

In vitro mutagenesis.

Independent mutations in the recombinant plasmid from the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone were performed by an in vitro insertion strategy using the EZ::TN <KAN-2> insertion kit (Epicentre). The kit uses the benefit of the Tn5 transposition system. The transposon containing the kanamycin resistance gene is randomly inserted into the target DNA under the control of transposase that is separately added to the reaction mix. After the inactivation of the transposase, the transposon can no longer move from its insertion site. The target DNA was the cosmid DNA purified from the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone with the plasmid midi kit (QIAGEN, Westburg, Germany). After a 2-h insertion reaction at 37°C, the reaction mix (the target DNA, the EZ::TN <KAN-2> transposon, and EZ::TN transposase in corresponding buffer) was incubated for 10 min at 70°C to inactivate the transposase and dialyzed for 60 min against distilled water. From the mix, 0.04 μg of DNA was electroporated at 2,250 V, 40 μF, and 132 Ω into E. coli DH5α electrocompetent cells (Invitrogen). After incubation for 45 min at 37°C, the transformants were plated onto Luria agar plates containing kanamycin for selection.

ELISAs.

An ELISA with the 2F3 MAb was used to screen the cosmid and mutant libraries for 2F3-positive and 2F3-negative clones, respectively, and all the strains from the collection. An ELISA with the anti-O26 E. coli agglutinating serum (Bio-Rad) was used to serotype the 2F3 ELISA-positives clones. Assays were performed with 96-well microtiter plates (Greiner) as previously described (9).

The absorbance was measured at 450 nm with an ELISA plate reader (Bio-Rad). The strains 4276 and DH5α were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The 2F3 ELISA-positive cosmid clone used in the mutagenesis assay was also used as a positive control to screen the mutant library. Optimum dilution of the reagents was obtained by titration. Readings three times higher than the average negative-control value were considered positive reactions.

LPS production and serotyping assays.

The presence of a complete LPS (with the O antigen) or of an incomplete LPS (without the O antigen) was detected by staining distinct colonies by the crystal violet staining assay (22). The smooth colonies are not stained since the presence of the O antigen on the LPS prevents the dye from penetrating the bacterial cells, whereas the rough colonies, because of the absence of the O antigen on the LPS, take up the dye and stain blue.

Serotyping was performed on wild-type strains, clones, and mutants in an agglutination assay using E. coli antiserum from Laboratorio de Referencia de E. coli (LREC), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain, for serogroups O26 and O16 and in an ELISA using E. coli antiserum (Bio-Rad) for serogroup O26. Briefly, the agglutination reaction was performed in microtiter plates with 50 μl of antiserum diluted 1/80 and 50 μl of boiled antigen suspension. Plates were examined for agglutination after overnight incubation at 37°C. O26 and O16 reference strains were used as positive and negative controls. E. coli strain DH5α was used as the negative control.

The anti-O26 O-antigen immune serum (Bio-Rad) was also used in the slide agglutination assay to detect the O26 O antigen among the collection of E. coli O26 strains.

A PCR assay using primers for a specific gene (wbuA) (Table 2) of the O26-antigen gene cluster was performed on mutants that did not produce any O antigen to confirm the presence of the O-antigen gene cluster.

TABLE 2.

Sequences of the primers used in this study

Primer name Primer sequence Reference
gnd 5′-CACTGCCATACCGACGACGCCGATCTGTTGCTTG-3′ 2
galF 5′-ATTGGTAGCTGTAAGCCAAGGGCGGTAGCGT-3′ 2
Kan2 FP 5′-ACCTACAACAAAGCTCTCATCAACC-3′ Epicentre
Kan2 RP 5′-GCAATGTAACATCAGAGATTTTGAG-3′ Epicentre
M13 FP 5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAG-3′ Invitrogen
M13 RP 5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′ Invitrogen
wbuA FP 5′-CTCTGATTATACAGAAGCA-3′ 7
wbuA RP 5′-AGTCGTAATATGAGCTTTTC-3′ 7

DNA amplification.

PCR amplifications were performed in a PCR Sprint thermocycler (Labsystems, Brussels, Belgium). A long-range PCR assay, using the Expand high-fidelity PCR system (Roche), was performed to amplify the O-antigen gene cluster or to obtain an estimation of the position of the insertion site of the transposons. To amplify the O-antigen gene cluster, primers specific for the gnd and galF genes (Table 2), two housekeeping genes bordering the O-antigen gene cluster, were used either on the genomic DNA from strain 4276 or on the cosmid DNA extracted from the 2F3 ELISA-positive clones from the cosmid library (2). The amplified DNA fragment from strain 4276 was subsequently cloned into DH5α E. coli by using the Expand cloning kit (Roche). To estimate the position of the insertion site of the transposons, the template DNA was the cosmid DNA extracted from the 2F3 ELISA-negative mutants. The primers used (Kan2 FP and Kan2 RP) were specific for the transposon (Table 2). After an initial denaturation stage of 5 min at 94°C, PCRs were carried out under the following conditions: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 64°C for 30 s, and extension at 68°C for 15 min for 17 cycles in a 50-μl reaction volume. A final extension stage at 68°C for 15 min was also performed.

Standard PCR assays were also performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Roche) to screen the rough mutants for O26-specific genes, as previously described (7). The primers used were specific for the wbuA gene (Table 2). The pathotypes of the strains from the collection were checked by PCR assay as described previously (5).

DNA sequencing.

The cosmid DNA purified from the clones and mutants of interest and DNA fragments produced by long-range PCR assay and purified with a QiaQuick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN) were submitted for sequencing. Sequencing was performed by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (20). Automatic reading was performed by using an ALF DNA sequencer (Pharmacia) and primers fluorescently labeled with Cy5 from Pharmacia. Sequence analysis and comparisons were performed by using Gene Work 2.4 (Intelli-Genetics, Mountain View, Calif.) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST network server (1).

The M13 FP and M13 RP primers (Invitrogen) were used to sequence the extremities of the fragment inserted into the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone from the cosmid library. The Kan2 FP and Kan2 RP primers (Epicentre) were used to sequence the extremities bordering the transposon in the 2F3 ELISA-negative clones from the mutant library (Table 2).

Western blotting.

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out on a whole-cell preparation from the wild-type O26 EHEC (4276) and EPEC (C15333) strains and from the clones obtained by restriction (IXD2) and long-range PCR (IIIC7) using NuPAGE 4 to 12% gradient gels under reducing conditions (Novex; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gels were stained with SimplyBlue SafeStain (Invitrogen) or transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane by blotting at 30 V for 1 h. After the transfer and blocking stages, the membranes were probed either with the 2F3 MAb or with the anti-O26 immune serum (Bio-Rad) as primary antibody. Specific immunoglobulin peroxidase conjugate was used as a secondary antibody (Sigma). The peroxidase substrate was 4-chloro-1-naphthol (Sigma), and after 10 min of incubation, the membrane was washed with distilled water to stop any further reaction.

RESULTS

Cosmid library screening.

A cosmid library of more than 2,000 clones was obtained from strain 4276. One of them (IXD2) was ELISA positive with the 2F3 MAb (Table 3). The length of the insert was estimated, in a 0.5% agarose electrophoresis gel, to be approximately 30 kb.

TABLE 3.

Typing the wild-type strains, the 2F3 ELISA-positives clones, and the mutants

Testa Test result
O26 wild-type E. coli strain:
Clone 1b (IXD2) Host strain (DH5α) Mutant obtained from the clone IXD2
Clone 2c (IIIC7) Control strain serotype:
4276 C15333 F5 F6 E4 H2 B1 O26 O16
2F3 + + + +
LPS + + + + + +
O26 + + + +
O26 ELISA + + + + +
O16 +
wbuA + + + + + + + + + +
a

2F3, ELISA with the 2F3 MAb as the primary antibody; LPS, LPS production checked by the crystal violet staining method; O26 and O16, agglutination with polyclonal immune serum to O26 (from Bio-Rad and LREC) and O16 (from LREC); O26 ELISA, O26 ELISA with polyclonal immune serum to O26 (Bio-rad); wbuA, PCR for an O26-specific gene.

b

Clone obtained by restriction of genomic DNA.

c

Clone obtained by long-range PCR.

Both the M13 FP and M13 RP primers were used to sequence the two extremities of the insert. The sequence obtained with the M13 RP primer showed 95% identity (129 of 135 bp) with the ugd gene that codes for UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase and is found on existing genomic maps of both E. coli O157:H7 and E. coli K-12. The sequence obtained with the M13 FP primer showed 97% identity (216 of 222 bp) with the wcaF gene, which codes for a putative acetyltransferase also found on existing genomic maps of both E. coli O157 and E. coli K-12.

In vitro mutagenesis.

In order to identify the genetic determinant of the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb, in vitro insertional mutagenesis was performed with the recombinant plasmid from the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone. More then 1,400 mutants were obtained. After this mutant library was screened by ELISA with the 2F3 MAb, more than 100 mutants were found to be negative.

The DNA sequences bordering the extremities of the transposon in the recombinant plasmid from five of these mutants (Table 3) were determined by using specific primers for the extremities of the transposon (Kan2 FP and Kan2 RP). The sequences obtained were compared with those from GenBank.

The sequences bordering the transposons from the H2, F5, and F6 mutants showed 99% identity with the fnl-1 gene from E. coli O26:K60:H311b. These sequences also showed 80% identity with the wbjB gene from Pasteurella multocida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 76% (192 of 258 bp) identity with the rfb gene cluster of Leptospira interrogans. For the E4 mutant, the sequences obtained showed 99% (320 of 323 bp) identity with the wbuA gene from E. coli O26:K60:H311b.

The sequences obtained with the B1 mutant showed 95% (622 of 652 bp) identity with the wbuB gene from E. coli O26:K60:H311b. The site of the transposon insertions and the disrupted genes are presented in Fig. 1.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Schematic representation of the insertions of the transposon EZ::TN <Kan-2> within the O26-antigen gene clusters in the mutants (E4, F5, F6, H2, and B1) obtained by insertional mutagenesis from the clone IXD2. The arrowheads target the mutated gene and not the actual insertion site.

Presence of the O26 gene cluster in the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone.

By long-range PCR using specific primers (gnd and galF) to amplify the O-antigen gene cluster, a fragment approximately 13 kb long was obtained. Further PCR assays using specific primers for the extremities of the transposons and for the galF and gnd genes showed that for all sequenced mutants, the transposons had been inserted inside the O-antigen gene cluster at different positions (Fig. 1).

For three of the mutants (F5, F6, and H2), the transposon was inserted at similar locations, approximately 5 kb from the gnd gene and approximately 8 kb from the galF gene. The distance between the sites of insertion of the transposons in the mutants F5 and F6 was 31 bp, and similarly, the sites of insertion of the transposons in the mutants F6 and H2 were 174 bp apart.

In the E4 mutant, the transposon was inserted approximately 6 kb from the gnd gene and 7 kb from the galF gene. In the B1 mutant, the transposon was inserted 0.8 kb from the gnd gene and approximately 12 kb from the galF gene.

Cloning the O-antigen gene cluster.

The product of the long-range PCR using the galF and gnd primers from strain 4276 was cloned into the E. coli strain DH5α. This recombinant clone (IIIC7) tested positive in the ELISA with the 2F3 MAb and with the anti-O26 immune serum (Table 3).

O-antigen production and serotyping assays.

In order to study the relationship between the O26 antigen and the 2F3 character, the production of the O antigen was examined by using the crystal violet staining assay (Table 3). The 2F3 ELISA-positive clones (IXD2 and IIIC7) and the wild-type 2F3 ELISA-positive strains (4276 and C15333) produce a smooth-type LPS (with the O antigen). The host strain (E. coli DH5α) and all 2F3 ELISA-negative mutants produce a rough-type LPS (without the O antigen). The antigenic specificity of the O antigen was confirmed by an agglutination assay and by an ELISA. The 2F3 ELISA-positive strains and clones tested positive with the O26 immune serum, but the IXD2 clone tested negative in the agglutination assay and with the O16 serum. Conversely, the 2F3 ELISA-negative strain and mutants gave negative results with both immune sera. Nevertheless, in a PCR using primers for a specific gene of the O26 O-antigen gene cluster (wbuA), positive results were obtained with all 2F3 ELISA-positive and -negative wild-type strains, clones, and mutants (Table 3).

Testing the specificity of the 2F3 MAb.

The 2F3 MAb gave positive reactions in the ELISA with all 70 eae-positive E. coli strains belonging to the O26 serogroup in a slide agglutination assay (Table 1). Conversely, the seven eae-negative O26 E. coli and the three eae-positive or eae-negative non-O26 E. coli strains tested negative in the ELISA with the 2F3 MAb. One 2F3 ELISA-positive strain, one negative wild-type O26 strain, and two positive clones (IXD2 and IIIC7) gave almost identical results by Western blotting with the 2F3 MAb and the O26 immune serum (Fig. 2). The only difference was the absence of a reaction of the 2F3 ELISA-negative wild-type O26 strain with the 2F3 MAb. The molecular weights of the bands from the 2F3 ELISA-positive wild-type strains and the IXD2 clone were the only other noticeable differences (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Nitrocellulose immunoblot using 2F3 MAb and the anti-O26 immune serum (Bio-Rad) comparing whole-cell preparations of E. coli strains 4276 (lanes 2 and 7) (O26; eae and verotoxin positive), DH5α as a negative control (lanes 3 and 8), clone IXD2 (lanes 4 and 9), and T282 (O26; eae and verotoxin negative). Lanes 1 and 6 contain the benchmark prestained molecular weight markers (Invitrogen).

DISCUSSION

The fact that related EPEC and EHEC strains are pathogens for humans and animals is well recognized. There is a diversity of strains that are pathogens for humans and animals, and even inside the same serogroup, the strains found as pathogens in human diseases are often different from those found in animal diseases, which shows that they have host specificity. This host specificity demonstrates a need to classify the strains into different groups according to their properties and their pathogenicity factors. Similarly, it is a necessity for assays to provide the tools to differentiate these strains.

To obtain a better understanding of the specificity of the 2F3 MAb for the O26 EHEC and EPEC strains, the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb and its genetic determinant were characterized. In this study, a recombinant plasmid carrying the genetic basis of the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb was obtained. The length of the cloned chromosomal DNA fragment was estimated to be about 30 kb. According to the sequences of the extremities of this fragment, its position on the existing E. coli maps corresponds to two gene clusters, the complete O-antigen gene cluster (22) and half of the colanic acid gene cluster from open reading frame 9 to open reading frame 21 (21). Both of these clusters are involved in LPS biosynthesis pathways, and based on information available from existing genomic maps for E. coli K-12 and E. coli O157:H7, the length of the fragment could be 30.5 kb with 27 genes or 33.7 kb with 28 genes, respectively (1).

By long-range PCR assays, it was shown that the fragment from the recombinant plasmid contains the entire O-antigen gene cluster from EHEC strain 4276. Furthermore, the sequences obtained after a mutagenesis assay showed a high degree of identity with genes involved in LPS biosynthesis pathways. The fnl-1 gene is one of the three genes that seem to be responsible for the synthesis of N-acetyl-l-fucosamine, one of the sugars composing the O26 O antigen (7). The wbjB gene from Pasteurella multocida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the rfb gene cluster of L. interrogans are also involved in the O-antigen biosynthesis pathway (6, 16). The wbuA and wbuB genes belong to the O-antigen gene cluster from the O26:K60:H311b E. coli strain and code for a putative rhamnosyl transferase and a putative l-fucosamine transferase, respectively (7).

Further analysis concerning the physical position of the transposons in the recombinant plasmid showed that all the 2F3 ELISA-negative mutants had inserted the transposon inside the O-antigen gene cluster. The F5, F6, and H2 mutants had inserted the transposon into the fnl-1 gene, the E4 mutant inserted it into the wbuA gene, and the B1 mutant inserted it into the wbuB gene.

The relationship between the character of 2F3 and LPS was clarified by the crystal violet staining of the colonies. By cloning a 30-kb fragment containing the entire O-antigen gene cluster from an EHEC strain into a rough-type LPS strain which is 2F3 ELISA negative, a 2F3 ELISA-positive clone with a smooth-type LPS was obtained. After in vitro insertional mutagenesis from the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone, several 2F3 ELISA-negative mutants were obtained, and all mutants produced a rough-type LPS. These results demonstrated the positive linkage between the character of 2F3 and the production of a smooth-type LPS. Moreover, the LPS produced carries the O26 O antigen recognized in agglutination assays, ELISAs, and Western blot assays with the two 2F3 ELISA-positive clones obtained after genomic DNA digestion and long-range PCR. Only the clone obtained after genomic DNA digestion did not react with the anti-O26 immune serum in the agglutination assay. One explanation could be that the complementation of the two mutations within the O-antigen gene cluster of the host strain, DH5α, produces an O antigen that is recognized by the 2F3 MAb but by neither the anti-O26 immune serum nor the anti-O16 immune serum. Alternatively, the presence in this clone of the second half of the colanic acid gene cluster, which is involved in LPS biosynthesis, may affect the agglutination result. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the 2F3 ELISA-positive clone obtained after PCR, which contains only the O-antigen gene cluster as the insert, is positive in the agglutination assay. So the presence of the disrupted colanic acid gene cluster may have resulted in the production of a hybrid LPS of a different size, as was observed by Western blotting, with interference in the agglutination assay.

In conclusion, the target of the 2F3 MAb is the O26 antigen from the EHEC and EPEC strains, and its genetic determinant is located inside the O-antigen gene cluster. The epitope recognized by the 2F3 MAb on the O26 O antigen has still not been identified. The O antigens are heterogeneous due to their sugar compositions, either monomers or polymers, and the linkage between them. The O26 O antigen contains three sugars: l-rhamnose, N-acetyl-l-fucosamine, and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (14). The 2F3 MAb may recognize one of these sugars, a particular linkage, or a particular arrangement between them. Transposons in two of the 2F3 ELISA-negative mutants were inserted in genes involved in sugar transferase synthesis (wbuA and wbuB), resulting in the absence of the O antigen on the surfaces of these mutants. It is possible that these two genes have a role in the production of the O antigen by acting during the process of the assemblage of the O unit. On the other hand, the mutations in the fnl-1 gene may indicate that the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb is its synthetic product (N-acetyl-l-fucosamine). These conclusions must be correlated with a possible polar effect of the transposon.

Another aspect of our findings is the presence of the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb on the O26 O antigen from the EHEC and EPEC strains and not on the O26 O antigen from the non-EHEC and non-EPEC strains. This fact may be explained by a genetic alteration or modification of O-antigen biosynthesis after a lateral gene transfer or a lysogenic conversion followed by recombination (10). Because of the strong association between the eae gene and the antigen recognized by the 2F3 MAb among O26 EHEC and EPEC strains, it is possible that the strain acquired them in the same moment of evolution. Nevertheless, the specificity of the 2F3 MAb for the O26 EPEC and EHEC strains allows the identification of these pathogenic strains within the O26 serogroup. The 2F3 MAb can therefore be considered a pertinent epidemiological tool.

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the Belgian Federal Ministry of Agriculture (grant 6011) and by the Commission of the European Community (contract QLK2-CT-2000-00600).

We thank L. Beutin (Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany), T. Casey (National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa), M. Moulin-Schouleur (Station de Pathologie Aviaire et de Parasitologie, Centre INRA Tours, Tours, France), F. Grimont (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France), and C. Dozois (Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo.) for several O26 strains; J. Blanco (Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain) for the E. coli serotyping kits; Iris Thamm (Centre d'Ingénierie des protéines, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium) for the DNA sequencing; and Olivier Marches (INRA-ENVT de Microbiologie Moleculaire, Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France) for useful discussions.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bastin, D. A., and P. R. Reeves. 1995. Sequence and analysis of the O antigen gene (rfb) cluster of Escherichia coli O111. Gene 164:17-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bertin, Y., C. Martin, J.-P. Girardeau, P. Phol, and M. Contrepois. 1998. Association of genes encoding P fimbriae, CS31A antigen and EAST 1 toxin among CNF1-producing Escherichia coli strains from cattle with septicemia and diarrhea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 162:235-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caprioli, A., and A. E. Tozzi. 1998. Epidemiology of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in continental Europe, p. 38-48. In J. B. Kaper and A. D. O'Brien (ed.), Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 5.China, B., V. Pirson, and J. Mainil. 1996. Typing of bovine attaching and effacing Escherichia coli by multiplex in vitro amplification of virulence-associated genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3462-3465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de la Pena-Moctezuma, A., D. M. Bulach, and B. Adler. 2001. Genetic differences among the LPS biosynthetic loci of serovars of Leptospira interrogans and Leptospira borgpetersenii. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 31:73-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DiSouza, J., L. Wang, and P. Reeves. 2002. Sequence of the Escherichia coli O26 O antigen gene cluster and identification of O26 specific genes. Gene 297:123-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jerse, A. E., J. Yu, B. D. Tall, and J. B. Kaper. 1990. A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7839-7843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kerr, P., H. Ball, B. China, J. Mainil, D. Finlay, D. Pollock, I. Wilson, and D. Mackie. 1999. Use of a monoclonal antibody against an Escherichia coli O26 surface protein for detection of enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic strains. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 6:610-614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lerouge, I., and J. Vanderleyden. 2002. O-antigen structural variation: mechanisms and possible roles in animal/plant-microbe interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26:17-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu, D., and P. R. Reeves. 1994. Escherichia coli K12 regains its O antigen. Microbiology 140:49-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mainil, J. 1999. Shiga/verocytotoxins and Shiga/verotoxigenic Escherichia coli in animals. Vet. Res. 30:235-257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mainil, J. G., E. R. Jacquemin, A. E. Kaeckenbeeck, and P. H. Pohl. 1993. Association between the effacing (eae) gene and Shiga-like toxin-encoding genes in Escherichia coli isolates from cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 54:1064-1068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manca, M. C., A. Weintraub, and G. Widmalm. 1996. Structural studies of the Escherichia coli O26 O-antigen polysaccharide. Carbohydr. Res. 281:155-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Milon, A., E. Oswald, and J. De Rycke. 1999. Rabbit EPEC: a model for the study of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Vet. Res. 30:203-219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mitchison, M., D. M. Bulach, T. Vinh, K. Rajakumar, S. Faine, and B. Adler. 1997. Identification and characterization of the dTDP-rhamnose biosynthesis and transfer genes of the lipopolysaccharide-related rfb locus in Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni. J. Bacteriol. 179:1262-1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nataro, J. P., and J. B. Kaper. 1998. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:142-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paton, J. C., and A. W. Paton. 1998. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:450-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sandvig, K. 2001. Shiga toxins. Toxicon 39:1629-1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stevenson, G., K. Andrianopoulos, M. Hobbs, and P. R. Reeves. 1996. Organization of the Escherichia coli K-12 gene cluster responsible for production of the extracellular polysaccharide colanic acid. J. Bacteriol. 178:4885-4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stevenson, G., B. Neal, D. Liu, M. Hobbs, N. H. Packer, M. Batley, J. W. Redmond, L. Lindquist, and P. Reeves. 1994. Structure of the O antigen of Escherichia coli K-12 and the sequence of its rfb gene cluster. J. Bacteriol. 176:4144-4156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Szalo, I. M., F. Goffaux, V. Pirson, D. Piérard, H. Ball, and J. Mainil. 2002. Presence in bovine enteropathogenic (EPEC) and enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) Escherichia coli of genes encoding for putative adhesins of human EHEC strains. Res. Microbiol. 153:653-658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wieler, L. H., E. Vieler, C. Erpenstein, T. Schlapp, H. Steinrück, R. Bauerfeind, A. Byomi, and G. Baljer. 1996. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from bovines: association of adhesion with carriage of eae and other genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2980-2984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES