Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2014 Jun 5;9(6):e96098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096098

Baseline CD4 Cell Counts of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in China: 2006–2012

Houlin Tang 1, Yurong Mao 1, Cynthia X Shi 1,2, Jing Han 1, Liyan Wang 3, Juan Xu 1, Qianqian Qin 3, Roger Detels 4, Zunyou Wu 1,*
Editor: Barbara Ensoli5
PMCID: PMC4047021  PMID: 24901790

Abstract

Background

Late diagnosis of HIV infection is common. We aim to assess the proportion of newly diagnosed HIV cases receiving timely baseline CD4 count testing and the associated factors in China.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Chinese HIV/AIDS Comprehensive Response Information Management System. Adult patients over 15 years old who had been newly diagnosed with HIV infection in China between 2006 and 2012 were identified. The study cohort comprised individuals who had a measured baseline CD4 count.

Results

Among 388,496 newly identified HIV cases, the median baseline CD4 count was 294 cells/µl (IQR: 130–454), and over half (N = 130,442, 58.8%) were less than 350 cells/µl. The median baseline CD4 count increased from 221 (IQR: 63–410) in 2006 to 314 (IQR: 159–460) in 2012. A slight majority of patients (N = 221,980, 57.1%) received baseline CD4 count testing within 6 months of diagnosis. The proportion of individuals who received timely baseline CD4 count testing increased significantly from 20.0% in 2006 to 76.9% in 2012. Factors associated with failing to receiving timely CD4 count testing were: being male (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15–1.19), age 55 years or older (OR:1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.06), educational attainment of primary school education or below (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.28–1.32), infection with HIV through injection drug use (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 2.02–2.12) or sexual contact and injection drug use (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.76–1.99), diagnosis in a hospital (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.88–1.95) or in a detention center (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.70–1.80), and employment as a migrant worker (OR:1.55, 95% CI:1.53–1.58).

Conclusion

The proportion of newly identified HIV patients receiving timely baseline CD4 testing has increased significantly in China from 2006–2012. Continued effort is needed for further promotion of early HIV diagnosis and timely baseline CD4 cell count testing.

Introduction

CD4 cell count is a major indicator of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection disease progression [1], [2]. Patients who receive a late diagnosis, defined as a baseline CD4 cell count<200 cells/µl, have significantly poorer responses to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and worse prognoses [3], [4], [5], [6]. The proportion of patients who present late to diagnosis and treatment remains unacceptably high [7], [8], [9], [10]. Internationally, the observed proportion of patients with late diagnoses is stable or worsening [7]. Although it is recommended that CD4 cell count testing should be carried out promptly after diagnosis, many patients fail to receive on-time testing [11], [12]. In the United States, an ongoing outpatient study in eight cities found that 78% of patients had a measured CD4 count within 3 months of HIV diagnosis [7]. This proportion was significantly lower in developing countries. Studies in Thailand, Vietnam, and South Africa reported that only 34%, 49%, and 62.6% of patients, respectively, received CD4 count assessment with 6 months of HIV diagnosis [13], [14], [15].

In 2002, China implemented the National Free Antiretroviral Therapy Program (NFATP) to address the issue of poor access to HIV/AIDS treatment. Patients who meet the national treatment criteria of a CD4 count ≤200 cells/µl (revised to ≤350cells/µl in 2008) are eligible for ART at no cost to the patient [16]. The program has contributed to a dramatic reduction in mortality among patients receiving HIV treatment [17]. In order to expand NFATP coverage, the government has increased HIV screening access, leading to a rise in the number of people diagnosed with HIV [18]. After the diagnosis of HIV infection, timely CD4 cell count testing is a crucial step in determining whether the patient meets criteria for ART initiation and engaging the patient in appropriate care and treatment [19], [20]. From 2007, the national HIV/AIDS program set quantitative targets of core indicators to monitor progress in key areas of HIV work. From 2007 to 2009, the proportion of CD4 cell count monitoring for people diagnosed with HIV and AIDS increased from 45.3% and 10.1% in 2007 to 54.2% and 62.5% in 2009, respectively [21].

However, past studies have indicated that many patients are lost or delayed along the continuum of care. A study in Guangxi and Yunnan found that only 37% of patients who were diagnosed with HIV from 2005 to 2009 received baseline CD4 testing within 6 months [20]. The proportion increased dramatically from 7% in 2005 to 62% in 2009. A separate study noted that in 2009, approximately 30% of the ART-initiated patients who received baseline CD4 testing had CD4 <50 cells/µl, indicating that many patients were being diagnosed and treated late [22], [23]. Prompt baseline CD4 testing is a critical step in successful linkage to HIV treatment.

By using data extracted from the Chinese HIV/AIDS Comprehensive Response Information Management System (CRIMS) [24], we aimed to identify trends in the proportion of individuals who received timely baseline CD4 cell count testing within 6 months of HIV diagnosis in China from 2006 to 2012. We also sought to determine changes in median baseline CD4 cell counts over time and factors associated with failing to receive CD4 cell count testing.

Methods

Data source

Data were collected from CRIMS, a web-based real-time database system managed by the National Centre for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention (NCAIDS), Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CRIMS was developed in 2005 and has previously been described elsewhere [24]. Local CDC staffs, who are trained on data upload and management, create electronic records in CRIMS for each patient who tests positive for HIV. Staffs receive annual refresher training. Patient records contain information on demographic characteristics, contact information (including both permanent and temporary residential addresses), sexual and drug use risk behaviors, likely transmission routes, medical histories, and laboratory test results [24]. For this study, we included all adult individuals (over 15 years old) who received a confirmed HIV diagnosis between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012. All HIV screening is done in accordance with national HIV policy. Provider-initiated testing and counseling (PITC) has been in place in hospitals since 2007.

Data analysis

The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of newly diagnosed HIV/AIDS individuals who received baseline CD4 cell count testing within 6 months of diagnosis. Data were described by the median (interquartile range, IQR) and the distribution across four CD4 cell count categories (<200, 200–349, 350–500, and ≥500). Demographic characteristics were analyzed using chi-squared statistics for dichotomous and categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the factors associated with not receiving a timely CD4 cell count. Variables with p<0.10 under univariate analysis were retained for multivariate modeling using stepwise selection, and 95% confidences intervals were estimated using these models. Results with a two-sided p<0.01 were considered statistically significant. All data analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Ethics statement

This study was a secondary data analysis using existing Chinese government HIV/AIDS CRIMS data. All subjects signed a general informed consent upon enrollment to CRIMS indicating that their data, after removing personal identifiers, could be used in statistical analyses and/or epidemiological research studies. Therefore, no additional study specific informed consent was necessary for this current study. Patient records and information were de-identified prior to analysis. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (approval #X130205248).

Results

Between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012, there were 394,294 individuals newly diagnosed with HIV infection in China. Patients under 15 years of age (N = 5,798) were excluded from the study cohort. Of the remaining 388,496 newly diagnosed individuals, 221,980 (57.1%) patients received a baseline CD4 cell count within 6 months of HIV diagnosis over the six-year study period (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline CD4 cell counts (within 6 months of diagnosis) of HIV individuals in China: 2006–2012.

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Total No. 35087 40491 47675 54552 58109 71166 81416 388496
No. (%) of subjects with baseline CD4 cells counts within one year
<15 days 3812 (10.9) 7021 (17.3) 12038 (25.3) 16332 (29.9) 20544 (35.4) 29437 (41.1) 37561 (46.1) 126745 (32.6)
<30 days 4608 (13.1) 8472 (20.9) 14538 (30.5) 20172 (37.0) 25372 (43.7) 36712 (51.6) 46753 (57.4) 156627 (40.3)
<90 days 5893 (16.8) 10949 (27.0) 18340 (38.5) 25434 (46.6) 32467 (55.9) 46623 (65.5) 57773 (71.0) 197479 (50.8)
<180 days 7030 (20.0) 13125 (32.4) 21122 (44.3) 29078 (53.3) 37081 (63.8) 51957 (73.0) 62587 (76.9) 221980 (57.1)
Median (IQR) baseline CD4 cell count 221(63–410) 252(80–429) 280(106–448) 287(116–454) 295(130–459) 299(140–454) 314(159–460) 294(130–454)
No. (%) of subjects with CD4 cell counts (cells/µl)
<200 3298 (46.9) 5552 (42.3) 7851 (37.2) 10620 (36.5) 12751 (34.4) 17266 (33.2) 19244 (30.7) 76582 (34.5)
200–349 1476 (21.0) 2941 (22.4) 5062 (24.0) 6858 (23.6) 9062 (24.4) 12877 (24.8) 15584 (24.9) 53860 (24.3)
350–499 1066 (15.2) 2299 (17.5) 4092 (19.4) 5802 (20.0) 7800 (21.0) 11691 (22.5) 15241 (24.4) 47991 (21.6)
≥500 1190 (16.9) 2333 (17.8) 4117 (19.5) 5798 (19.9) 7468 (20.1) 10123 (19.5) 12518 (20.0) 43547 (19.6)

The number of newly identified HIV cases with measured baseline CD4 counts more than doubled between 2006 and 2012, increasing from 35,087 to 81,416. The proportion of newly diagnosed individuals who received a baseline CD4 cell count test within 6 months increased from 20.0% in 2006 to 76.9% in 2012. National policies recommend CD4 cell count testing within 14 days after diagnosis of HIV infection. Our study found that the proportion of newly diagnosed individuals who received baseline CD4 cell count testing within 14 days increased from 10.9% in 2006 to 46.1% in 2012 (Table 1).

The median baseline CD4 cell count of individuals who received timely testing over the study period was 294 cells/µl (IQR: 130–454). Over half of the patients (N = 130,442, 58.8%) had baseline CD4 cell counts <350 cells/µl, and 76,582 patients (34.5%) had baseline CD4 cell counts <200 cells/µl. Less than a quarter of patients (N = 43,547, 19.6%) had baseline CD4 cell counts ≥500 cells/µl (Table 1).

The median baseline CD4 cell count increased slightly by each calendar year over the study period from 221 cells/µl (IQR: 63–410) in 2006 to 314 cells/µl (IQR: 159–460) in 2012. The percentage of individuals with baseline CD4 cell counts <200 cells/µl, indicating advanced disease, decreased from 46.9% in 2006 to 30.7% in 2012. The percentage of individuals diagnosed with baseline CD4 cell counts ≥500 cells/µl, indicating a recent acquisition of HIV infection, has remained relatively stable (Table 1).

Characteristics associated with receiving baseline CD4 cell count testing within 6 months were being female, being married, having attained middle school education or higher, having acquired HIV through male-to-male sexual contact or commercial blood plasma donation, and being diagnosed with HIV infection at a voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clinic (Table 2). A total of 34,248 newly diagnosed individuals (8.8%) died within 6 months after HIV diagnosis. Of these individuals, 23,661 (69.1%) had not received CD4 cell count testing.

Table 2. Factors associated with baseline CD4 cell counts (within 6 months of diagnosis) of HIV individuals in China: 2006–2012, based on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

No. of new cases No. (%) of subjects with baseline CD4 cell count Unadjusted OR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) P-value
Year of HIV diagnosis
2006 35087 7030 (20.0) 1.00 1.00
2007 40491 13125 (32.4) 0.52 (0.51–0.54) <0.01 0.57 (0.55–0.59) <0.01
2008 47675 21122 (44.3) 0.32 (0.31–0.33) <0.01 0.39 (0.38–0.40) <0.01
2009 54552 29078 (53.3) 0.22 (0.21–0.23) <0.01 0.28 (0.27–0.29) <0.01
2010 58109 37081 (63.8) 0.14 (0.14–0.15) <0.01 0.19 (0.18–0.20) <0.01
2011 71166 51957 (73.0) 0.09 (0.09–0.10) <0.01 0.13 (0.12–0.13) <0.01
2012 81416 62587 (76.9) 0.08 (0.07–0.08) <0.01 0.11 (0.10–0.11) <0.01
Gender
Female 113340 67460 (59.5) 1.00 1.00
Male 275156 154520 (56.2) 1.15 (1.13–1.16) <0.01 1.17 (1.15–1.19) <0.01
Age (years)
15–24 58323 31195 (53.5) 1.00 1.00
25–34 132737 70982 (53.5) 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.96 0.82 (0.80–0.84) <0.01
35–44 101295 58885 (58.1) 0.83 (0.81–0.85) <0.01 0.80 (0.78–0.82) <0.01
45–54 43726 28773 (65.8) 0.60 (0.58–0.61) <0.01 0.80 (0.78–0.83) <0.01
55+ 52415 32145 (61.3) 0.73 (0.71–0.74) <0.01 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 0.03
Marital status
Single, divorced, or widowed 175776 101301 (57.6) 1.00 1.00
Married or lives with partner 201596 119162 (59.1) 0.94 (0.93–0.95) <0.01 0.87 (0.86–0.89) <0.01
Education
Middle school or above 231092 145738 (63.1) 1.00 1.00
Primary school or below 145077 75502 (52.0) 1.57 (1.55–1.60) <0.01 1.30 (1.28–1.32) <0.01
Occupation
Other* 210105 119033 (56.7) 1.00 <0.01 1.00
Farmer or rural laborer 178391 102947 (57.7) 0.96 (0.95–0.97) 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.15
Ethnicity
Minority group 117896 53500 (45.4) 1.00 1.00
Han 270600 168480 (62.3) 0.50 (0.50–0.51) <0.01 0.76 (0.74–0.77) <0.01
Route of HIV infection
Heterosexual contact 222148 143431 (64.6) 1.00 1.00
Male-to-male sexual contact 44840 35277 (78.7) 0.49 (0.48–0.51) <0.01 0.62 (0.60–0.64) <0.01
Injection drug use 76815 26791 (34.9) 3.40 (3.34–3.46) <0.01 2.07 (2.02–2.12) <0.01
Sexual contact and injection drug use 5030 2111 (42.0) 2.52 (2.38–2.67) <0.01 1.87 (1.76–1.99) <0.01
Blood (plasma) donation 17204 10429 (60.6) 1.18 (1.15–1.22) <0.01 0.83 (0.81–0.87) <0.01
Site of HIV diagnosis
VCT centers 110360 73316 (66.4) 1.00 1.00
Hospitals 153367 87886 (57.3) 1.48 (1.45–1.50) <0.01 1.91 (1.88–1.95) <0.01
Detention centers 47218 14846 (31.4) 4.32 (4.22–4.42) <0.01 1.75 (1.70–1.80) <0.01
Others** 77551 45932 (59.2) 1.36 (1.34–1.39) <0.01 1.42 (1.39–1.46) <0.01
Migrant worker***
No 294016 177081 (60.2) 1.00 1.00
Yes 94480 44899 (47.5) 1.67 (1.65–1.70) <0.01 1.55 (1.53–1.58) <0.01
Total 388496 221980 (57.1) - - - -

*Includes laborer, unemployed, businessman, student, public servant, and unclear.

**Includes targeted intervention project, physical examination for sex workers, and unclear.

***Defined as having migrated from the registered region of residence to another region for at least six months.

In the univariate logistic regression model, factors associated with baseline CD4 cell count testing within 6 months of HIV diagnosis were age group, gender, marital status, education level, ethnicity, employment as a migrant worker, route of HIV transmission, site of HIV diagnosis, and year of HIV diagnosis (Table 2).

In the multivariate logistic regression model (Table 2), predictors for not receiving CD4 cell count testing with 6 months included being male (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15–1.19), age 55 years or older (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.06), educational attainment of primary school or below (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.28–1.32), occupation as a farmer or rural laborer (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.15–1.18), route of HIV transmission classified as injecting drug use (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 2.02–2.12) or sexual contact and injecting drug use (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.76–1.99), HIV diagnosis in a hospital (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.88–1.95) or a detention center (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.70–1.80), and being a migrant worker (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.53–1.58). Factors associated with timely CD4 testing included being married or cohabiting with a partner (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.86–0.89), being of Han ethnicity (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.74–0.77), and route of HIV transmission classified as male-to-male sexual contact (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.60–0.64) or commercial blood plasma donation (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81–0.87).

Baseline CD4 cell counts were also analyzed by the route of HIV infection and the year of reporting (Table 3). There were significant differences in the distributions of CD4 cell counts by the routes of HIV infection and by the year of HIV diagnosis (heterosexual contact: χ2 = 119.63, p<0.01; male-to-male sexual contact: χ2 = 21.07, p<0.01; IDUs: χ2 = 191.85, p<0.01; and commercial blood plasma donation: χ2 = 66.95, p<0.01). Individuals infected through heterosexual contact and commercial blood plasma donation were more likely to have baseline CD4 cell counts <200 cells/µl than individuals infected by male-to-male sexual contact, injection drug use, or sexual contact and injection drug use.

Table 3. Number and percentage of newly HIV-diagnosed adults receiving baseline CD4 cell count testing within 6 months of diagnosis in China: 2006–2012, by routes of HIV transmission.

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 χ2
Total No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % P-value
Heterosexual contact
<200 54579 1519 46.0 3043 42.0 4863 39.3 7229 39.7 9459 38.7 13277 37.7 15189 35.6
200–349 35232 712 21.5 1686 23.2 3015 24.4 4279 23.5 6031 24.7 8870 24.7 10639 24.9 χ2 = 119.63
350–500 28918 522 15.8 1282 17.7 2298 18.6 3426 18.8 4674 19.1 7225 19.1 9491 22.3 p<0.01
≥500 24702 552 16.7 1240 17.1 2202 17.8 3274 18.0 4261 17.4 5839 17.4 7334 17.2
Male-to-male sexual contact
<200 6622 70 28.7 165 24.6 371 18.3 662 18.3 1059 18.8 1822 19.6 2473 18.0
200–349 9274 65 26.6 182 27.1 575 28.4 1019 28.1 1525 27.0 2348 25.2 3560 25.9 χ2 = 21.07
350–500 10438 54 22.1 183 27.2 568 28.1 1033 28.5 1651 29.2 2763 29.7 4186 30.4 p<0.01
≥500 8943 55 22.5 142 21.1 511 25.2 910 25.1 1413 25.0 2383 25.6 3529 25.7
Injection drug use
<200 6635 549 33.1 867 30.5 1006 27.5 1115 26.4 1051 23.3 1100 21.4 947 19.9
200–349 6158 375 22.6 660 23.2 840 23.0 991 23.5 1015 22.5 1209 23.5 1068 22.5 χ2 = 191.81
350–500 6277 305 18.3 601 21.1 802 22.0 901 21.3 1072 23.8 1312 25.5 1284 27.0 p<0.01
≥500 7721 431 26.0 715 25.2 1003 27.5 1213 28.8 1373 30.4 1530 29.7 1456 30.6
Sexual contact and injection drug use
<200 566 8 40.0 19 35.8 90 24.9 140 32.9 94 20.8 126 29.2 89 24.3
200–349 482 5 25.0 10 18.9 95 26.2 86 20.2 98 21.7 92 21.3 96 26.2 χ2 = 0.85
350–500 461 3 15.0 7 13.2 78 21.5 86 20.2 106 23.5 89 20.6 92 25.1 p = 0.36
≥500 602 4 20.0 17 32.1 99 27.3 113 26.6 154 34.1 125 28.9 90 24.5
Blood (plasma) donation
<200 6502 1030 66.3 1215 68.3 1129 60.6 1046 63.2 824 61.4 773 56.5 485 55.8
200–349 1867 274 17.6 290 16.3 364 19.5 281 17.0 241 17.9 247 18.1 170 19.6 χ2 = 66.95
350–500 1152 149 9.6 143 8.0 192 10.3 178 10.8 153 11.4 198 14.5 139 16.0 p<0.01
≥500 908 100 6.4 131 7.4 177 9.5 150 9.0 125 9.3 150 11.0 75 8.6

The median baseline CD4 cell counts for all age groups increased slightly from 2006 to 2012 (Figure 1). However, the median baseline CD4 cell count for patients 45 years and older remained below 250 cells/µl over the study period. The median baseline CD4 cell counts of patients by route of transmission show none-to-little increase over the study period (Figure 2). Individuals infected through heterosexual contact and through commercial blood plasma donation had considerably lower median baseline CD4 cell counts than other subgroups.

Figure 1. Median baseline CD4 cell counts (within 6 months of diagnosis) of newly diagnosed HIV individuals in China from 2006 to 2012, stratified by age group.

Figure 1

The median baseline CD4 cell counts, stratified by age group, increased each year from 2006 to 2012. Older age groups were associated with lower median baseline CD4 cell counts.

Figure 2. Median baseline CD4 cell counts (within 6 months of diagnosis) of newly diagnosed HIV individuals in China from 2006 to 2012, stratified by routes of infection.

Figure 2

The median baseline CD4 cell counts, stratified by route of transmission, increased each year from 2006 to 2012. Subjects infected through injection drug use, male-to-male sexual contact, or sexual contact and injection drug use were consistently associated with higher median baseline CD4 cell counts compared to those infected through heterosexual contact or infected through blood (plasma) donation.

Discussion

The aim of our study was to identify the proportion of HIV-positive individuals in China who received baseline CD4 testing within 6 months and characteristics associated with failing to receive testing within 6 months. CD4 cell count measurements are a standard component of HIV testing algorithms to monitor disease progression. Few past studies in China [20] have evaluated access to baseline CD4 cell count testing, and this is the first study to present results on a national scale.

In the era of “Treatment as Prevention,” early HIV detection, timely monitoring of disease progression, and early linkage to ART are critical steps to curbing the spread of HIV [25], [26], [27], [28]. In the United States, about 77% of HIV-diagnosed individuals are linked to care within 3–4 months, and 51% were retained in ongoing care [29]. With effective interventions such as the addition of case management, the proportion of HIV-positive patients linked to ongoing care can be significantly increased compared to those who receive the standard of care [30]. As China continues to develop and expand its national AIDS programs, including the NFATP, it will be critical to have regular assessment and monitoring of the programs' ability to link newly identified HIV-positive individuals to timely CD4 testing and treatment initiation.

To monitor the implementation of the national AIDS programs, NCAIDS developed annual quantitative targets of core program elements, including the “proportion of people known to be living with HIV whose CD4 cell counts were monitored at least once a year, to determine anti-retroviral therapy eligibility” [21]. For individuals nationwide diagnosed with HIV and AIDS, this proportion rose from 45.3 and 10.1% in 2007 to 54.2 and 62.5% in 2009, respectively [21]. Expanding on this previous finding, this current study shows that significant progress has also been made in increasing baseline CD4 cell count testing among HIV newly diagnosed individuals, as evidenced by the increase in CD4 cell count testing within 6 months from 20.0% in 2006 to 76.9% in 2012. The increases in CD4 monitoring of both new HIV cases and previously diagnosed cases were facilitated by structural expansions of the national AIDS programs and increases in the availability of testing materials/equipment [20], [31].

National policies recommend that the blood draw for the baseline CD4 cell count test should be completed at the first follow-up visit, which is scheduled at 14 days following the diagnosis. In our study, about 53.7% of individuals diagnosed in 2012 did not receive baseline CD4 cell count testing by the 14-day benchmark, and 23.1% did not receive CD4 cell count testing within 6 months. We identified several individual-level risk factors for failing to receive CD4 cell count testing within 6 months: age 55 years or older, male, primary school education or below, route of HIV transmission categorized as injection drug use or combined sexual contact and injection drug use, being diagnosed at a hospital or a detention center, and being a migrant worker. Some population-level factors are also likely to influence the obtainment and timing of CD4 testing. Until recent years, many county hospitals did not have the CD4 cell count testing equipment. In several regions with very low HIV prevalence, some counties and municipalities only had one CD4 detection machine for the entire area. This was likely to have delayed CD4 cell count testing for a small propotion of newly diagnosed HIV-positive individuals. Other population-level factors may include stigma and long distances between residences and clinics [32].

In our study, the majority of newly HIV diagnosed individuals were infected through heterosexual contact (Table 2). This is in accordance with recent literature indicating that sexual transmission has become the dominant mode of HIV transmission in China [23], [33], [34]. Over 60% of these individuals had baseline CD4 cell counts <350 cells/µl over the study period (Table 3), which is a higher proportion than those infected by male-to-male sexual contact or injection drug use. While HIV in China was historically driven by epidemics among injection drug users (IDUs), China will need to adjust to the challenges of facing an HIV epidemic that is predominantly spread by sexual contact. The group with the highest proportion (over 75%) of CD4 cell counts <350 cells/µl were individuals infected through commercial blood plasma donation. In the mid-1990s, there were major outbreaks of HIV through unsafe commercial blood and plasma donations [35], [36]. The extent of the epidemic was identified through large-scale targeted screening interventions among former paid plasma donors [37].

The two populations who had the highest median baseline CD4 counts were IDUs and men who have sex with men (MSM). This suggests that outreach efforts to reach these high-risk populations have produced some success in promoting early and regular HIV screening. However, MSM had the highest percentage of timely CD4 testing (78.7%) while IDUs had the lowest percentage (34.9%) when comparing subpopulations by route of transmission. Past research studies have similarly noted that MSM present with higher median CD4 levels compared to other risk groups [7]. In our study cohort, the relative success in linking HIV-positive MSM to timely CD4 testing may also be due to a comprehensive prevention and control program in sixty-one cities from 2008 to 2009 targeted towards MSM. This program was carried out with the support of MSM community groups. This program led to policies and additional ongoing intervention programs that address HIV prevention, HIV diagnosis and CD4 cell count testing among MSM.

The barriers for IDUs to access medical care are well-documented [38]. In China, many IDUs are engaged in migrant work, have unstable lifestyles, experience stigma and discrimination from health providers, and face the fear of arrest due to the illegality of drug use in China [19]. Our study noted a slight increase of CD4 cell count levels in IDUs over the study period. In recent years, several intervention measures been taken to decrease illicit drug use and to strengthen prevention and control of HIV transmission among IDUs [39], [40]. Another significant strategy for engaging the HIV-positive IDU population in regular care is to expand access to methadone maintenance treatment, which has been shown to independently promote linkage to HIV care and treatment [41].

Our study found that older patients were more likely to present at late disease stages, which has been noted previously in the literature [42]. There is currently very limited research [43], [44] on elderly HIV patients in China, who are not typically considered a vulnerable population for contracting HIV. According to data in CRIMS, the number of newly diagnosed individuals who were 55 years old or older has significantly increased in recent years [unpublished data, NCAIDS, 2013], as it has in the United States. Further studies are needed to explore issues related to the diagnosis and treatment of elderly HIV-positive patients in China.

Perhaps due to the implementation of the national AIDS programs [21] the proportion of patients with advanced HIV disease (CD4 count <200 cells/µl) has declined slightly since 2007. Of the 221,963 individuals who received timely baseline CD4 testing, the proportion of patients diagnosed late with HIV has declined slightly over the study period from 2006 to 2012. In our study cohort, 34.5% of individuals (N = 76580) had baseline CD4 counts of <200 cells/µl and 58.8% (N = 130434) had baseline CD4 counts of <350 cells/µl (Table 1). Late diagnosis and late ART initiation are strongly associated with negative health outcomes, including suboptimal CD4 increases with treatment, a high rate of opportunistic infections, and increased risk of mortality [45]. Early identification of HIV and prompt monitoring are critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing disease transmission.

Our study has several limitations. First, all data is reported by local providers and may have not been uploaded to the national databases in a timely manner. While providers and CDC staff review the data for completeness and accuracy, there may be some errors in the database. Second, in most cases, the route of infection was self-reported by the individual, and some misreporting may have occurred due to stigma, particularly for the categories of male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use. Third, while we attempted to reduce the influence of confounding variables by using multivariate analysis, it remains possible that there was confounding by unmeasured variables. Fourth, our study analysis did not assess disease progression of the newly diagnosed HIV/AIDS patients by clinical staging or viral load testing. This information is available elsewhere in CRIMS; however, a full discussion of monitoring strategies over the study period is beyond the scope of this paper. Finally, our study did not exclude individuals who died between their diagnosis and the 6-month benchmark for timely CD4 testing. These patients were included in the 8% of the study cohort who were indicated as lost to follow-up and subsequently categorized as not having received timely CD4 testing. A study that only assesses individuals who were still living 6 months after HIV diagnosis may produce higher rates of timely CD4 testing.

The risk factors identified in this study should guide future intervention strategies to increase early HIV diagnosis and CD4 cell count testing among key populations. In recent years, an increasing number of HIV cases have been identified at VCT clinics at local CDC sites, which have higher rates of linkage to baseline CD4 testing. Regional strategies that have achieved success in reducing loss to follow up and increasing linkage to care have included in-parallel Western blot confirmation testing and baseline CD4 testing (Yunnan) and compressing the timeframe from screening, confirmation, and CD4 testing (Guangxi).

This study's evaluation of baseline CD4 cell count testing after HIV diagnosis provides a valuable reference for further increasing testing coverage and linkage to care. Despite significant improvement, a high proportion (23.1%) of HIV-positive patients still failed to receive timely CD4 count testing in 2012, the last year of the study. To shorten the time to CD4 cell count testing and to improve access to regular testing and treatment, there should be efforts to dramatically improve referrals and integration of patient tracking between the health facilities responsible for patient follow-up, CD4 cell count testing, and ART delivery.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the health care and laboratory staff who participated in data collection for this study and conducted CD4 baseline testing.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein reflect the collective views of the co-authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. Funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The authors report funding from the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China (grant#131-11-0001-0501), and the US National Institutes of Health (grant# U2RTW06918). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Mellors JW, Muñoz A, Giorgi JV, Margolick JB, Tassoni CJ, et al. (1997) Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HlV-1 infection. Annals of Internal Medicine 126: 946–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hogg RS, Yip B, Chan KJ, Wood E, Craib KJ, et al. (2001) Rates of disease progression by baseline CD4 cell count and viral load after initiating triple-drug therapy. JAMA 286: 2568–2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dybul M, Bolan R, Condoluci D, Cox-Iyamu R, Redfield R, et al. (2002) Evaluation of initial CD4+ T cell counts in individuals with newly diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus infection, by sex and race, in urban settings. Journal of Infectious Diseases 185: 1818–1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD, Grimes JM, Demeter LM, et al. (1997) A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team. N Engl J Med 337: 725–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chaisson RE, Keruly JC, Moore RD (2000) Association of initial CD4 cell count and viral load with response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. JAMA 284: 3128–3129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chadborn TR, Delpech VC, Sabin CA, Sinka K, Evans BG (2006) The late diagnosis and consequent short-term mortality of HIV-infected heterosexuals (England and Wales, 2000–2004). AIDS 20: 2371–2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Buchacz K, Armon C, Palella FJ, Baker RK, Tedaldi E, et al. (2012) CD4 Cell Counts at HIV Diagnosis among HIV Outpatient Study Participants, 2000–2009. AIDS Res Treat 2012: 869841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ogbuanu IU, Torres ME, Kettinger L, Albrecht H, Duffus WA (2009) Epidemiological characterization of individuals with newly reported HIV infection: South Carolina, 2004–2005. American Journal of Public Health 99 Suppl 1S111–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ (2011) The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 52: 793–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Althoff KN, Gange SJ, Klein MB, Brooks JT, Hogg RS, et al. (2010) Late presentation for human immunodeficiency virus care in the United States and Canada. Clinical Infectious Diseases 50: 1512–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Easterbrook PJ, Yu LM, Goetghebeur E, Boag F, McLean K, et al. (2000) Ten-year trends in CD4 cell counts at HIV and AIDS diagnosis in a London HIV clinic. AIDS 14: 561–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. CD4 Collaborative Group (1992) Use of monitored CD4 cell counts: predictions of the AIDS epidemic in Scotland. AIDS 6: 213–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thanawuth N, Chongsuvivatwong V (2008) Late HIV diagnosis and delay in CD4 count measurement among HIV-infected patients in Southern Thailand. AIDS Care 20: 43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tran DA, Shakeshaft A, Ngo AD, Rule J, Wilson DP, et al. (2012) Structural Barriers to Timely Initiation of Antiretroviral Treatment in Vietnam: Findings from Six Outpatient Clinics. PloS one 7: e51289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kranzer K, Zeinecker J, Ginsberg P, Orrell C, Kalawe NN, et al. (2010) Linkage to HIV Care and Antiretroviral Therapy in Cape Town, South Africa. PloS one 5: e13801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhang F, Dou Z, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, et al. (2011) Effect of earlier initiation of antiretroviral treatment and increased treatment coverage on HIV-related mortality in China: a national observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 11: 516–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang F, Dou Z, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Liu Z, et al. (2009) Five-year outcomes of the China National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program. Annals of Internal Medicine 151: : 241–251, W–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wu Z, Wang Y, Detels R, Rotheram-Borus MJ (2010) China AIDS policy implementation: reversing the HIV/AIDS epidemic by 2015. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 2ii1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhang F, Haberer JE, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Ma Y, et al. (2007) The Chinese free antiretroviral treatment program: challenges and responses. AIDS 21: S143–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhang Y, Lu L, Li HQ, Liu W, Tang ZR, et al. (2011) Engaging HIV-infected patients in antiretroviral therapy services: CD4 cell count testing after HIV diagnosis from 2005 to 2009 in Yunnan and Guangxi, China. Chinese Medical Journal 124: 1488–1492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Liu Y, Wu Z, Mao Y, Rou K, Wang L, et al. (2010) Quantitatively monitoring AIDS policy implementation in China. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 2ii90–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wen Y, Zhao D, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Lu L, et al. (2011) Some patient-related factors associated with late access to ART in China' s free ART program. AIDS Care 23: 1226–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dou Z, Chen RY, Xu J, Ma Y, Jiao JH, et al. (2010) Changing baseline characteristics among patients in the China National Free Antiretroviral Treatment Program, 2002–09. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 2ii56–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mao Y, Wu Z, Poundstone K, Wang C, Qin Q, et al. (2010) Development of a unified web-based national HIV/AIDS information system in China. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 279–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Galvan FH, Bing EG, Bluthenthal RN (2000) Accessing HIV testing and care. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 25 Suppl 2S151–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. García F, de Lazzari E, Plana M, Castro P, Mestre G, et al. (2004) Long-term CD4+ T-cell response to highly active antiretroviral therapy according to baseline CD4+ T-cell count. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 36: 702–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.UNAIDS (2012) Global report 2012: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS.
  • 28. Hull MW, Wu Z, Montaner JS (2012) Optimizing the engagement of care cascade: a critical step to maximize the impact of HIV treatment as prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 7: 579–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2011) Vital signs: HIV prevention through care and treatment—United States. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60: 1618–1623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gardner LI, Metsch LR, Anderson-Mahoney P, Loughlin AM, del Rio C, et al. (2005) Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care. AIDS 19: 423–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Jiang Y, Qiu M, Zhang G, Xing W, Xiao Y, et al. (2010) Quality assurance in the HIV/AIDS laboratory network of China. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 2ii72–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Govindasamy D, Ford N, Kranzer K (2012) Risk factors, barriers and facilitators for linkage to antiretroviral therapy care: a systematic review. AIDS 26: 2059–2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wu Z (2011) New challenge and complex situation on HIV/AIDS control and prevention in China (in Chinese). Chin J Public Health 27: 1505–1507. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang N, Wang L, Wu Z, Guo W, Sun X, et al. (2010) Estimating the number of people living with HIV/AIDS in China: 2003–2009. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 2ii21–ii28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wu Z, Liu Z, Detels R (1995) HIV-1 infection in commercial plasma donors in China. Lancet 346: 61–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wu Z, Sullivan SG, Wang Y, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Detels R (2007) Evolution of China's response to HIV/AIDS. Lancet 369: 679–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wu Z, Rou K, Detels R (2001) Prevalence of HIV infection among former commercial plasma donors in rural eastern China. Health Policy and Planning 16: 41–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Celentano DD, Galai N, Sethi AK, Shah NG, Strathdee SA, et al. (2001) Time to initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected injection drug users. AIDS 15: 1707–1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yin W, Hao Y, Sun X, Gong X, Li F, et al. (2010) Scaling up the national methadone maintenance treatment program in China: achievements and challenges. International Journal of Epidemiology 39 Suppl 2ii29–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Smith K, Bartlett N, Wang N (2012) A harm reduction paradox: comparing China's policies on needle and syringe exchange and methadone maintenance. Int J Drug Policy 23: 327–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao Y, Shi CX, McGoogan JM, Rou K, Zhang F, et al.. (2013) Predictors of accessing antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected drug users in China's National Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program. Addiction Forthcoming. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42. Mugavero MJ, Castellano C, Edelman D, Hicks C (2007) Late diagnosis of HIV infection: the role of age and sex. American Journal of Medicine 120: 370–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liu H, Lin X, Xu Y, Chen S, Shi J, et al. (2012) Emerging HIV epidemic among older adults in Nanning, China. Aids Patient Care and STDS 26: 565–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chen X, Zheng J, He JM, Qin B, Hu Y, et al. (2011) Unusual increase in reported HIV/AIDS cases among older persons in western Hunan province, China. Sexually Transmitted Infections 87: 538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lawn SD, Little F, Bekker LG, Kaplan R, Campbel E, et al. (2009) Changing mortality risk associated with CD4 cell response to antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. AIDS 23: 335–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES