Abstract
Background
Hyperandrogenism (HA) has been linked with several components of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Few studies in Asian women have evaluated the important risk factors for and prevalence of MetS according to PCOS subtype. In this study, we investigated differences in metabolic parameters and the prevalence of MetS in two major phenotypic subgroups of PCOS in Korea. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between HA-associated parameters and MetS.
Materials and Methods
This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from May 2010 to December 2011 in Korea. A total of 837 females with PCOS, aged 15–40, were recruited from Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at 13 hospitals. Of those, 700 subjects with either polycystic ovaries (PCO)+HA+oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea (O) or PCO+O were eligible for this study. MetS was diagnosed according to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria.
Results
MetS was more prevalent in the PCO+HA+O group (19.7%) than in the PCO+O (11.9%) group. There were statistically significant trends for an increased risk of MetS in the PCO+HA+O group compared to the PCO+O group. After adjustment for age, the odds ratio of MetS was 2.192 in non-obese subjects with PCO+HA+O compared to those with PCO+O, whereas the risk of MetS was not different in obese patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high free androgen index and low sex hormone-binding globulin were significantly associated with MetS in non-obese women with PCOS, with odds ratios of 4.234 (95% CI, 1.893–9.474) and 4.612 (95% CI, 1.978–10.750), respectively. However, no associations were detected between MetS and SHBG and FAI in obese PCOS subjects.
Conclusions
Our results indicate that HA and its associated parameters (FAI and SHBG) are significantly associated with MetS in non-obese PCOS subjects, whereas this association was not observed in obese subjects.
Introduction
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder, affecting 5–10% of reproductive-aged women [1]–[3]. It is associated with metabolic features such as insulin resistance (IR), metabolic syndrome (MetS), dyslipidemia and increased cardiovascular risk factors [4]. The 2003 Rotterdam consensus workshop of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ESHRE/ASRM) proposed a definition of PCOS with at least two of the following three criteria: oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea (O), clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism (HA), and polycystic ovaries (PCO) on ultrasonography [5]. According to these Rotterdam criteria, PCOS is divided into four phenotypes: PCO+HA+O, HA+O, PCO+O and HA+PCO [6].
MetS is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors that are associated with glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, obesity, and hypertension [7]. According to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panal (ATP) III guidelines [8], the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome is made when three or more of the following risk factors are present: a waist circumference >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women, fasting plasma glucose ≥100 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg, fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <40 mg/dL in men and <50 mg/dL in women. For Asian populations, the cut-off value for waist circumference was ≥90 cm in men and ≥80 cm in women based on the International Diabetes Foundation (IDF) [8].
IR with subsequent hyperinsulinemia plays a major role in the development of MetS [9]. In addition, IR plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PCOS [10]. Several studies have shown that women with PCOS have a higher prevalence of MetS than age-matched women in the general population [11]–[13]. The prevalence of MetS in women with PCOS has been reported to be 43.0–46.0% in the United States [11], [13]. In Korea, the prevalence of MetS in PCOS was 14.5%, nearly 3.5-fold higher than that reported for age-matched women in the Korean urban population [14], [15]. Hyperandrogenism (HA), a significant pathophysiological feature in PCOS, has been linked with several components of MetS [16]. In particular, androgen excess in PCOS may contribute to increased visceral fat, decreased lipolysis in subcutaneous fat, reduced insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, decreased HDL-C levels, and increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels [16]. Some studies have indicated a positive association between MetS and HA in women with PCOS [11], [17]. Therefore, early and regular screening of metabolic disturbance in PCOS women is particularly important.
Although several studies have reported the independent risk factors for and prevalence of MetS in PCOS, few studies in Asian women have evaluated the important risk factors for and prevalence of MetS according to PCOS subtype. In this study, we examined differences in metabolic parameters and the prevalence of MetS in two major phenotypic subgroups of PCOS in Korea. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between HA-associated parameters and MetS.
Materials And Methods
Ethics Statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Seoul National University, Seoul Samsung Hospital, Asan Medical Center, Severance Hospital, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, MizMedi Hospital, Maria Fertility Hospital, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Mirae-Heemang Hospital and Kyungpook National University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects and/or their parents before participating in this study. Minors signed the written consent form by themselves in addition to their parent.
Study participants
This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from May, 2010 to December, 2011 in Korea. In total, 837 women with PCOS were recruited from the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at 13 hospitals. We selected 749 women with PCOS, aged 15–40, after excluding 88 subjects whose MetS component values were unavailable. PCOS was diagnosed according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria as the presence of at least two of the following three features [5]: oligo or anovulation (O), clinical and/or biochemical HA and PCOs on ultrasound. Using these criteria, subjects with PCOS were divided into four subgroups: HA+PCO, HA+O, PCO+O and PCO+HA+O. Of the four different phenotypic groups, the PCO+HA+O (n = 432, 57.7%) and PCO+O (n = 268, 35.8%) groups were included in this analysis because the HA+PCO (n = 20, 2.7%) and HA+O (n = 29, 3.9%) groups were too small for statistical analysis. Thus, 700 subjects were eligible for this study. Oligo or anovulation was defined as a cycle length in excess of 35 days or less than 8 cycles per year or absence of menstruation for more than 3 months. Biochemical HA was defined as total testosterone (T) >0.68 ng/mL, free T>1.72 pg/mL, or a free androgen index (FAI) value >5.36, and a modified Ferriman–Gallwey score (mF-G score) of more than 6 was defined as clinical HA [18]. Ovaries were considered polycystic on ultrasound if there were 12 or more follicles measuring 2–9 mm in diameter in each ovary and/or enlarged ovarian volume (>10 mm3) [5]. Subjects with abnormal thyroid function, abnoromal prolactin levels, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing's syndrome, androgen-secreting tumors, diagnosed cardiovascular disease as well as those taking oral contraceptives, lipid-lowering agents, or insulin sensitizers were excluded from this study. This study was registered with the Clinical Research information Service (CRiS, registration number KCT0000739). Data were entered by a web-based case report form, using the clinical research and trial management system (iCReaT), which was developed by the Korea National Institute of Health.
Clinical and biochemical measurements
Body weight and height were measured to the nearest 0.1 kg or 0.1 cm and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height (meters) squared. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the lower ribs and the top of the iliac crest in the standing position. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer after a 5-min rest period, and three BP readings were taken from right or left arms at 30-s intervals. The average systolic and diastolic BP values of two measurements taken in a sitting position were recorded.
Blood samples were collected after at least an 8-h fast. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and HDL-C levels were measured enzymatically (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. Osaka, Japan). The detection limit for FPG, TC, TG and HDL-C were 0–750 mg/dL, 0–675 mg/dL, 0–550 mg/dL and 17–90 mg/dL. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 0-8-0.9% and 1.4–1.5% for FPG, 0.6–1.4% and 1.3–2.1% for TC, and 0.5–1.6%, 0.9–2.4% for TG and 0.6–0.7% and 2.2–2.5% for HDL-C. Fasting insulin levels were measured using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) (BioSource Europe S.A., Belgium) and Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) was evaluated by immunoturbidimetric assay with a COBAS Integra 800 system (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The homeostatic model for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by fasting insulin (µIU/mL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/(22.5×18).
Total T, free T and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured using a RIA (Siemens, Los Angeles, CA, USA) in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle or upon first examination in subjects with oligo or anovulation. RIA was based on hormone-specific antibodies that are immobilized to the wall of polypropylene tubes and the use of a 125I-labeled tracer. FAI was calculated as total T/SHBG ×100×3.467. The detection limit for total T, free T and SHBG were 0.10 ng/mL, 0.15 pg/mL and 0.04 nmol/L. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.0–11.0% and 5.9–12.0% for total T, 4.0–17% and 8.0–18.3% for free T, and 2.8–5.3% and 7.9–8.5% for SHBG. All measures were performed at a single center (Seoul National University Hospital).
Definition of metabolic syndrome
MetS was diagnosed if three or more of the following risk factors were present: waist circumference ≥80 cm; triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol <50 mg/dL; fasting plasma glucose ≥100 mg/dL; systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg [8]. Abdominal obesity was defined using the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, and triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose and blood pressure were categorized according to the modified National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines [8].
Statistical analysis
Distribution testing for normality was done using the Shapiro-Wilk test and data were log transformed to obtain normalized distributions. The baseline characteristics of the PCOS phenotype were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) or number (%) or age- and BMI-adjusted geometric means with 95% CIs. Statistical differences between PCO+HA+O and PCO+O (PCOS subjects with HA and without HA) groups were compared with independent sample t-tests or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Age- and BMI-adjusted geometric means for log-transformed variables are back-transformed for ease of interpretation and given with 95% CIs. The prevalence of MetS and metabolic syndrome parameters was compared by chi-squared tests. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify associations between the PCOS phenotype and MetS according to BMI. The odds ratios (ORs) of MetS according to age, BMI, and HA-associated parameters were also calculated using multivariable logistic regression analyses in non-obese and obese groups. Total T, free T, FAI, and mF-G scores were divided into low and high groups according to biochemical or clinical HA criteria. SHBG was categorized into two groups based on the median value. Values of P<0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software (version 19.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Baseline characteristics
The baseline characteristics and clinical, hormonal, and metabolic parameters of the PCOS subgroups are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 27.9±5.4 years and their mean BMI was 22.5±4.1 kg/m2. The mean age of the subjects in the PCO+O group was significantly higher than that of those in the PCO+HA+O group (P = 0.004); however, mean BMI was higher in the PCO+HA+O group (P<0.001). Of the 546 subjects, 26 (4.8%) had diabetes mellitus (DM) and PCO+HA+O group was more likely to have a history of DM (6.2% in the PCO+HA+O and 1.7% in the PCO+O, P = 0.023). After adjustment for age and BMI, higher levels of WC were observed in the PCO+O group (P = 0.003). Average systolic and diastolic BP values were similar in the PCOS subgroups, whereas FPG, PP2 glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, TC and LDL-C values were significantly higher in the PCO+HA+O group compared to those in the PCO+O group.
Table 1. Clinical, hormonal and metabolic parameters in the PCO+HA+O and PCO+O groups.
| Variables (n = 700) | PCO+HA+O (n = 432) | PCO+O (n = 268) | P value | ||||
| Age (years)a | 27.4 | ± | 5.5 | 28.6 | ± | 5.1 | 0.004 |
| BMI (kg/m2)a | 23.1 | ± | 4.3 | 21.5 | ± | 3.4 | <0.001 |
| <25 kg/m2b | 318 | (73.6) | 237 | (88.4) | <0.001 | ||
| ≥25 kg/m2b | 114 | (26.4) | 31 | (11.6) | |||
| WC (cm)c | 75.9 | (76.1–76.6) | 77.4 | (46.6–78.2) | 0.003 | ||
| Diabetesbd | 23 | (6.2) | 3 | (1.7) | 0.023 | ||
| Hypertensionb | 34 | (7.9) | 13 | (4.9) | 0.121 | ||
| SBP (mmHg)c | 112.4 | (111.3–113.4) | 113.1 | (111.7–114.4) | 0.385 | ||
| DBP (mmHg)c | 71.2 | (70.2–72.1) | 71.2 | (70.0–72.4) | 0.962 | ||
| mF-G scorec | 5.1 | (4.7–5.4) | 2.4 | (2.1–2.7) | <0.001 | ||
| Total testosterone (ng/mL)c | 0.70 | (0.67–0.74) | 0.35 | (0.32–0.37) | <0.001 | ||
| Free testosterone (pg/mL)c | 0.91 | (0.85–0.98) | 0.62 | (0.56–0.68) | <0.001 | ||
| SHBG (nmol/L)c | 58.4 | (54.8–62.2) | 62.7 | (57.7–68.0) | 0.188 | ||
| Free androgen indexc | 4.2 | (4.0–4.5) | 1.9 | (1.8–2.1) | <0.001 | ||
| FPG (mg/dL)c | 89.4 | (88.0–90.7) | 84.6 | (82.9–86.3) | <0.001 | ||
| PP2 glucose (mg/dL)ce | 101.8 | (98.7–105.0) | 93.0 | (89.5–96.8) | 0.001 | ||
| Fasting insulin (µU/mL)c | 9.3 | (8.8–9.8) | 8.4 | (7.8–9.0) | 0.032 | ||
| PP2 insulin (µU/mL)cf | 34.2 | (31.2–37.4) | 32.5 | (28.8–36.6) | 0.512 | ||
| HOMA-IRc | 2.0 | (1.9–2.2) | 1.8 | (1.6–1.9) | 0.006 | ||
| Hemoglobin A1C (%)cg | 5.4 | (5.3–5.4) | 5.5 | (5.4–5.5) | 0.108 | ||
| TC (mg/dL)c | 182.2 | (179.3–184.9) | 173.3 | (170.0–176.8) | <0.001 | ||
| HDL-C (mg/dL)c | 56.5 | (55.3–57.7) | 57.0 | (55.4–58.6) | 0.646 | ||
| LDL-C (mg/dL)c | 101.9 | (99.4–104.5) | 93.3 | (90.3–96.4) | <0.001 | ||
| TG (mg/dL)c | 92.3 | (88.1–96.6) | 86.4 | (81.5–91.7) | 0.093 | ||
Statistical differences between groups were compared with independent sample t-tests or ANCOVA for continuous variables, and chi-square tests for categorical variables.
Data are shown as means ± SD;
number (%).
Values are age- and BMI-adjusted geometric means (95% CI) for log-transformed variables; adjusted means and 95% CIs were back-transformed. P-values were evaluated by ANCOVA, adjusting for age and BMI.
Diabetes information was available for 546 participants (PCO+HA+O, n = 372; PCO+O, n = 174).
PP2 glucose was available for 682 participants (PCO+HA+O, n = 422; PCO+O, n = 260).
PP2 insulin was available for 646 participants (PCO+HA+O, n = 403; PCO+O, n = 243).
Hemoglobin A1C was available for 550 participants (PCO+HA+O, n = 372; PCO+O, n = 178).
BMI, body-mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; mF-G, modified Ferriman–Gallwey; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; PP2, postprandial 2 h; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model for insulin resistance; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome parameters
MetS was more prevalent in the PCO+HA+O group (19.7%) than in the PCO+O (11.9%) group (P = 0.008). Increased WC was the most frequent abnormality in both PCOS subgroups (40.0% in the PCO+HA+O group, 34.7% in the PCO+O group, P = 0.157), followed by low HDL-C (32.6% in the PCO+HA+O group, 24.6% in the PCO+O group, P = 0.024). The prevalence of elevated FPG was much higher in PCOS patients with HA (P = 0.001). Although the mean SBP and DBP were not different, elevated BP was more frequent in patients with HA (P = 0.028) (Table 2).
Table 2. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome parameters according to PCOS subgroup.
| Variables | PCO+HA+O (n = 432) | PCO+O (n = 268) | P value | ||
| WC ≥80 cm | 173 | (40.0) | 93 | (34.7) | 0.157 |
| TG ≥150 mg/dL | 83 | (19.2) | 40 | (14.9) | 0.147 |
| HDL-C <50 mg/dL | 141 | (32.6) | 66 | (24.6) | 0.024 |
| FPG ≥100 mg/dL | 65 | (15.0) | 18 | (6.7) | 0.001 |
| BP ≥130/85 mmHg | 65 | (15.0) | 25 | (9.3) | 0.028 |
| Metabolic syndrome (≥3 of the above factor) | 85 | (19.7) | 32 | (11.9) | 0.008 |
Data are expressed as n (%) and differences evaluated by chi-square test.
Results of multivariable logistic regression analysis of MetS
The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis of MetS in the two PCOS subgroups are presented in Table 3. We found statistically significant trends for an increased risk of MetS in the PCO+HA+O group compared to the PCO+O group after adjustment for age (P = 0.001); however, additional adjustment for BMI attenuated this association, rendering them statistically non-significant. For further analysis, PCOS subjects were divided into two groups: non-obese (BMI <25 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2). When the study population was divided according to BMI, the MetS prevalence in the obese group were 58.1% and 46.5% in the PCO+O and PCO+HA+O groups, respectively. Among non-obese patients, the prevalence of MetS was much higher in subjects in the PCO+HA+O group compared to those in the PCO+O group (10.1% vs. 5.9%). After adjustment for age, the non-obese group with PCO+HA+O had an approximately two times higher risk of MetS compared with those with PCO+O (P = 0.021). However, it was no longer significant after adjustment for age and BMI. In contrast, the association between obese-PCOS and MetS was not significant in any of the adjusted models.
Table 3. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of metabolic syndrome according to PCOS subgroup.
| Variables | Metabolic syndrome | |||||
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) | Age, BMIa-adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||||
| All | ||||||
| PCO+O (n = 268) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| PCO+HA+O (n = 432) | 1.807 | (1.165–2.802) | 2.121 | (1.350–3.333) | 1.198 | (0.707–2.031) |
| P-value | 0.008** | 0.001** | 0.502 | |||
| BMI <25 kg/m2 | ||||||
| PCO+O (n = 237) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| PCO+HA+O (n = 318) | 1.782 | (0.929–3.421) | 2.192 | (1.123–4.277) | 1.683 | (0.828–3.421) |
| P-value | 0.082 | 0.021* | 0.150 | |||
| BMI ≥25 kg/m2 | ||||||
| PCO+O (n = 31) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| PCO+HA+O (n = 114) | 0.628 | (0.281–1.400) | 0.702 | (0.308–1.601) | 0.630 | (0.269–1.480) |
| P-value | 0.255 | 0.400 | 0.289 | |||
*P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Log-transformed value was used for analysis.
PCO, polycystic ovaries; HA, Hyperandrogenism; O, oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea.
Odds ratio of MetS according to HA-associated parameters
Table 4 shows the ORs for MetS by age, BMI, and HA-associated parameters. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, there were statistically significant associations between MetS and FAI and SHBG (data not shown) (P = 0.006 and P<0.001). Additionally, high FAI (>5.36) and low SHBG (≤70.0 nmol/L) (data not shown) were significantly associated with the risk of MetS in non-obese PCOS patients after adjustment for age, BMI, and HOMA-IR (P<0.001 and P<0.001). However, no associations were detected between MetS and FAI and SHBG (data snot shown) in obese PCOS subjects.
Table 4. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of metabolic syndrome according to age, BMI and HA-associated parameters.
| Variables | Metabolic syndrome (All) | |||||||
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Age-adjusted OR (95% CI) | Age, BMIa-adjusted OR (95% CI) | Age, BMIa, HOMA-IRa adjusted OR (95% CI) | |||||
| All | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 1.138 | (1.087–1.191)*** | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||||||
| <25 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| ≥25 | 10.617 | (6.811–16.549)*** | 10.645 | (6.711–16.886)*** | ||||
| Free androgen index | ||||||||
| ≤5.36 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| >5.36 | 4.256 | (2.808–6.452)*** | 6.017 | (3.808–9.508)*** | 2.616 | (1.532–4.468)*** | 2.191 | (1.255–3.826)** |
| mF-G score | ||||||||
| <6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ≥6 | 1.198 | (0.787–1.826) | 1.657 | (1.061–2.587)* | 1.108 | (0.646–1.901) | 1.086 | (0.622–1.897) |
| BMI <25 kg/m2 | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 1.159 | (1.079–1.246)*** | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.967 | (1.602–2.414)*** | 1.920 | (1.559–2.365)*** | ||||
| Free androgen index | ||||||||
| ≤5.36 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| >5.36 | 5.198 | (2.775–9.739)*** | 8.381 | (4.162–16.876)*** | 5.543 | (2.623–11.716)*** | 4.234 | (1.893–9.474)*** |
| mF-G score | ||||||||
| <6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ≥6 | 1.150 | (0.596–2.219) | 1.747 | (0.872–3.502) | 1.899 | (0.894–4.034) | 1.886 | (0.842–4.220) |
| BMI ≥25 kg/m2 | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 1.109 | (1.039–1.183)** | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.126 | (1.017–1.246)* | 1.149 | (1.032–1.279)* | ||||
| Free androgen index | ||||||||
| ≤5.36 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| >5.36 | 1.004 | (0.521–1.933) | 1.316 | (0.653–2.651) | 1.119 | (0.542–2.312) | 1.032 | (0.492–2.167) |
| mF-G score | ||||||||
| <6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ≥6 | 0.610 | (0.314–1.185) | 0.784 | (0.389–1.582) | 0.721 | (0.350–1.486) | 0.716 | (0.343–1.496) |
*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Log-transformed value was used for analysis.
Discussion
In this study, MetS was more prevalent in the PCO+HA+O group than in the PCO+O group. HA was significantly associated with MetS, especially in the non-obese PCOS subgroup (PCO+HA+O). Our data also indicated independent associations between HA-associated parameters and MetS in the non-obese subgroup. The clinical and demographical characteristics of subjects in the HA+PCO and HA+O groups are presented in Table S1.
The prevalence of obesity in women with PCOS has been reported to be 30–75% [1], [9]. Another study in Thailand showed that the prevalence of PCOS subjects with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was approximately 50% [12]. In a multiracial group of women with PCOS, a mean BMI higher than 32 kg/m2 was reported, suggesting that obesity is strongly associated with PCOS [11], [19]. However, in our study, 20.7% were obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2), and the prevalence in the non-obese group (BMI <25 kg/m2) was 88.4% in the PCO+O group and 73.6% in the PCO+HA+O group, suggesting that non-obese women with PCOS are common in our population. In addition, the mean BMI was about 22.5 kg/m2, which is similar to other Korean studies [14], [20]. Therefore, the reasons for the more common development of PCOS in non-obese Korean women should be elucidated in future studies.
In our study, the prevalence of MetS in the PCOS group varied across ethnic/racial regions and a high prevalence of MetS has been reported in Brazilian, Indian, Chinese and multiracial populations with PCOS [7]. The prevalence of MetS among females with POCS in the United States is 43.0–46.0% [11], [13], which is higher than age-matched females in the general population. In a previous study in young Korean females with PCOS, the prevalence of MetS was 14.5%, suggesting that MetS is less common in Korean patients with PCOS but higher than in the general population [14]. The BMI differences between different ethnic groups may have contributed to the above findings [7]. The overall prevalence of MetS in our study was 16.7%. Such a low prevalence may be related to the relatively low prevalence of obesity in our study population. The most frequent components among PCOS patients in the United States were high WC (67%) and low HDL-C (68%) [11]. Another study in Korea showed that the most frequent feature was low HDL-C (45%), followed by high WC (24%) [14]. Similarly in our subjects, the most prevalent factors of MetS was increased WC (38.0%), followed by low HDL-C (29.6%).
PCOS women have different metabolic risk according to phenotypes [21]. We found the prevalence of MetS to be significantly higher in the PCO+HA+O (19.7%) group than in the PCO+O (11.9%) group, as reported elsewhere [22]. Among Iranian women with PCOS, aged 18–42 years, the prevalence of MetS was higher in those with HA than in those without HA [22]. Moreover, after adjustment for age and BMI, FPG, PP2 glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, TC and LDL-C were significantly higher in the PCO+HA+O group than in the PCO+O group. Therefore, the significant differences between the groups regarding metabolic parameters may indicate an increased risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease in the PCO+HA+O group. The prevalence of MetS components in the PCO+HA+O and PCO+O groups according to BMI are presented in Table S2.
The risk of MetS significantly increased among non-obese women with PCOS after adjustment for age. However, this association was not statistically significant after additional adjustment for BMI. As the sample size of our population was not large enough, additional adjustment might be attenuated the statistical power. In addition, androgen receptors have been found in both preadipocytes and adipocytes, and there is some evidence that sex steroid hormones play an important role in the adipose tissue metabolism [23]. Therefore, HA may be a key factor contributing to MetS, independent of or in synergy with central obesity and visceral adiposity [24]. Although the mechanisms linking these interactions are not clear, PCOS and associated metabolic comorbidities may possibly associated with a vicious circle represented by androgen excess and abdominal obesity [25]. The existing evidence suggests that androgen excess favors abdominal visceral adiposity, and visceral fat encourages further production of androgens through the direct effect of several mediators including hypoadiponectinemia, increased tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and leptin levels and other factors, or as a result of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinims [25]. In the present study, the observed association between PCOS women with HA and MetS was attenuated after adjustment for age and BMI, suggesting that the relation could be partially mediated by BMI. There were statistically significant associations between MetS and SHBG and FAI in the PCO+HA+O subgroup among non-obese subjects. Because we evaluated biochemical HA according to levels of total T, free T, and FAI, it was thought that obese PCOS had no association with HA and MetS. That is, HA is associated with MetS in non-obese women but not obese women with PCOS.
Androgen excess in PCOS may involve the aggravation of metabolic abnormalities, such as increased visceral fat, decreased lipolysis in subcutaneous fat, insulin resistance in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle and lipid metabolism [16]. Additionally, androgens may contribute to potential direct vascular action [16]. However, the association with androgen-associated parameters and MetS in Korean women with PCOS has not been evaluated. In our study, we found a significant association with HA and MetS in the non-obese subjects, whereas this association was not observed in obese subjects. Moreover, non-obese PCOS showed the significant association with HA-associated parameters. Taking our findings into consideration, obesity itself may contribute to MetS among obese subjects with PCOS. Also, the proportion of obese subjects in this study population was relatively low. Thus, insignificant findings may be possibly explained by the lack of statistical power. Several studies provide epidemiologic evidence regarding HA and MetS in females with PCOS. Our results are similar to one such study, which reported that HA was a significant predictor of MetS in PCOS, independent of obesity and IR [19]. Moreover, studies of Italian adolescents with PCOS reported that HA was a risk factor for MetS, despite the subjects' relative youth [24]. In addition, HA was an independent risk factor for MetS among premenopausal women even without PCOS [26].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the relationship between HA, its associated parameters, and MetS among Korean women with PCOS.
There are limitations to this study. First, as the study was cross-sectional in design, a causal relationship cannot be identified. Further longitudinal study will be needed to achieve higher levels of evidence. Second, although our results may be representative of PCOS patients in Korea, it may not be generalized to other ethnic groups. Third, total T, free T and SHBG were measured using a RIA. Although direct measurements by RIA assay might be useful clinically, this method is highly variable and inaccurate [27]. Alternatively, a gold standard method, such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, is particularly more accurate for clinical research [27]. Fourth, our results cannot reflect other potential confounding factors, such as smoking, drinking, exercise, and diet patterns. Accordingly, further studies with a follow-up will be needed to assess the present results.
Conclusions
MetS was more prevalent in the PCO+HA+O group than in the PCO+O group, especially in the non-obese PCOS subjects. This study also demonstrate a significant association between MetS and HA, largely due to higher FAI and lower SHBG. Therefore, these findings imply greater risk of MetS in non-obese women with hyperandrogenemic PCOS phenotypes in Korea.
Supporting Information
Mean values of clinical, hormonal and metabolic parameters in the HA+PCO and HA+O groups.
(DOC)
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome factors in the PCO+HA+O and PCO+O groups.
(DOC)
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Korea National Institute of Health intramural research grant, 4800-4861-303 (2012-N63001-00) and 4800-4845-302 (2010-N63001-00). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Ehrmann DA (2005) Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 352: 1223–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Knochenhauer ES, Key TJ, Kahsar-Miller M, Waggoner W, Boots LR, et al. (1998) Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 3078–3082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Asunción M, Calvo RM, San Millán JL, Sancho J, Avila S, et al. (2000) A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 2434–2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Teede H, Deeks A, Moran L (2010) Polycystic ovary syndrome: a complex condition with psychological, reproductive and metabolic manifestations that impacts on health across the lifespan. BMC Med 8: 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 19: 41–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yilmaz M, Isaoglu U, Delibas IB, Kadanali S (2011) Anthropometric, clinical and laboratory comparison of four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37: 1020–1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kandaraki E, Christakou C, Diamanti-Kandarakis E (2009) Metabolic syndrome and polycystic ovary syndrome and vice versa. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 53: 227–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, et al. (2005) American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 112: 2735–2752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Essah PA, Nestler JE (2006) The metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 29: 270–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Holte J (1996) Disturbances in insulin secretion and sensitivity in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 10: 221–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Apridonidze T, Essah PA, Iuorno MJ, Nestler JE (2005) Prevalence and characteristics of the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 1929–1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Weerakiet S, Bunnag P, Phakdeekitcharoen B, Wansumrith S, Chanprasertyothin S, et al. (2007) Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Asian women with polycystic ovary syndrome: using the International Diabetes Federation criteria. Gynecol Endocrinol 23: 153–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Glueck CJ, Papanna R, Wang P, Goldenberg N, Sieve-Smith L (2003) Incidence and treatment of metabolic syndrome in newly referred women with confirmed polycystic ovarian syndrome. Metabolism 52: 908–915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Park HR, Choi Y, Lee HJ, Oh JY, Hong YS, et al.. (2007) The metabolic syndrome in young Korean women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (Suppl 1): S243–S246. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15. Oh JY, Hong YS, Sung YA, Barrett-Connor E (2004) Prevalence and factor analysis of metabolic syndrome in an urban Korean population. Diabetes Care 27: 2027–2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Christakou CD, Diamanti-Kandarakis E (2008) Role of androgen excess on metabolic aberrations and cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Women's Health (Lond Engl) 4: 583–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cussons AJ, Watts GF, Burke V, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, et al. (2008) Cardiometabolic risk in polycystic ovary syndrome: a comparison of different approaches to defining the metabolic syndrome. Hum Reprod 23: 2352–2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kim JJ, Chae SJ, Choi YM, Hwang SS, Hwang Kr, et al. (2011) Assessment of hirsutism among Korean women: results of a randomly selected sample of women seeking pre-employment physical check-up. Hum Reprod 26: 214–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Coviello AD, Legro RS, Dunaif A (2006) Adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome have an increased risk of the metabolic syndrome associated with increasing androgen levels independent of obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 492–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chae SJ, Kim JJ, Choi YM, Hwang KR, Jee BC, et al. (2008) Clinical and biochemical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome in Korean women. Hum Reprod 23: 1924–1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, et al. (2012) Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril 97: 28–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mehrabian F, Khani B, Kelishadi R, Kermani N (2011) The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance according to the phenotypic subgroups of polycystic ovary syndrome in a representative sample of Iranian females. J Res Med Sci 16: 763–769. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Dieudonne MN, Pecquery R, Boumediene A, Leneveu MC, Giudicelli Y (1998) Androgen receptors in human preadipocytes and adipocytes: regional specificities and regulation by sex steroids. Am J Physiol 274: C1645–C1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fruzzetti F, Perini D, Lazzarini V, Parrini D, Genazzani AR (2009) Hyperandrogenemia influences the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome abnormalities in adolescents with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol 25: 335–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Escobar-Morreale HF, San Millan JL (2007) Abdominal adiposity and the polycystic ovary syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab 18: 266–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Korhonen S, Hippeläinen M, Vanhala M, Heinonen S, Niskanen L (2003) The androgenic sex hormone profile is an essential feature of metabolic syndrome in premenopausal women: a controlled community-based study. Fertil Steril 79: 1327–1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, et al. (2009) The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil Steril 91: 456–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Mean values of clinical, hormonal and metabolic parameters in the HA+PCO and HA+O groups.
(DOC)
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome factors in the PCO+HA+O and PCO+O groups.
(DOC)