Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2014 Apr 24;289(23):16541–16550. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.561878

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Studies of DNA Polymerase β

THE CRITICAL ROLE OF FINGERS DOMAIN MOVEMENTS AND A NOVEL NON-COVALENT STEP DURING NUCLEOTIDE SELECTION*

Jamie B Towle-Weicksel , Shibani Dalal , Christal D Sohl §, Sylvie Doublié , Karen S Anderson §, Joann B Sweasy ‡,1
PMCID: PMC4047420  PMID: 24764311

Background: DNA Pol β participates in base excision repair by choosing correct dNTP to fill single-nucleotide gaps in DNA.

Results: Pol β experiences a non-covalent step with correct dNTP selection.

Conclusion: Correct and incorrect dNTP incorporation by Pol β are different.

Significance: FRET-based system of Pol β elucidates a mechanism of substrate choice necessary for understanding the molecular basis of human disease.

Keywords: Base Excision Repair (BER), DNA Polymerase, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), Mutagenesis, Protein Conformation, Fidelity of DNA Synthesis

Abstract

During DNA repair, DNA polymerase β (Pol β) is a highly dynamic enzyme that is able to select the correct nucleotide opposite a templating base from a pool of four different deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs). To gain insight into nucleotide selection, we use a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based system to monitor movement of the Pol β fingers domain during catalysis in the presence of either correct or incorrect dNTPs. By labeling the fingers domain with ((((2-iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (IAEDANS) and the DNA substrate with Dabcyl, we are able to observe rapid fingers closing in the presence of correct dNTPs as the IAEDANS comes into contact with a Dabcyl-labeled, one-base gapped DNA. Our findings show that not only do the fingers close after binding to the correct dNTP, but that there is a second conformational change associated with a non-covalent step not previously reported for Pol β. Further analyses suggest that this conformational change corresponds to the binding of the catalytic metal into the polymerase active site. FRET studies with incorrect dNTP result in no changes in fluorescence, indicating that the fingers do not close in the presence of incorrect dNTP. Together, our results show that nucleotide selection initially occurs in an open fingers conformation and that the catalytic pathways of correct and incorrect dNTPs differ from each other. Overall, this study provides new insight into the mechanism of substrate choice by a polymerase that plays a critical role in maintaining genome stability.

Introduction

Approximately 20,000 DNA lesions are removed per human cell per day via the base excision repair (BER)2 pathway (1). Short patch BER functions in the removal of single-base damage from DNA. BER is initiated by removal of a damaged base by a DNA glycosylase (2). A monofunctional glycosylase generates an abasic (AP) site that is processed by apurinic/apyrimidinic AP endonuclease 1 (APE1), which nicks the sugar-phosphate backbone to generate a 3′ OH and a 5′ deoxyribose phosphate, which is removed by Pol β. Bifunctional glycosylases catalyze excision of the damaged base and AP site removal, leaving a 3′ deoxyribose phosphate and a 5′ phosphate. APE1 catalyzes removal of the 3′ deoxyribose phosphate to generate a 3′ OH. In both cases, Pol β fills in the gap and XRCC1-Ligase IIIα or Ligase I seals the remaining nick in the DNA (3).

Pol β plays an important role in ensuring the fidelity of DNA synthesis during repair. The 39-kDa protein is a member of the X-family of DNA polymerases and has four domains: the 8-kDa lyase, thumb, palm, and fingers domains. Whereas the other three domains are responsible for DNA binding and catalytic activity, the fingers domain (residues 262–335) forms the nucleotide binding pocket and thus plays a central role in nucleotide selection (47). A series of crystal structures of Pol β suggest that binding of dNTPs induces a conformational change whereby helix N of the fingers domain moves closer to the DNA (8). This conformational change occurs rapidly to form the active site, which catalyzes phosphodiester bond formation (also known as the chemistry step). Product release is considered to be the rate-limiting step (Scheme 1) (9).

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1.

Biochemical pathway of nucleotide incorporation of Pol β. DNA binding creates a binary complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of KD(DNA) (step 1). The binary Pol β binding to dNTP forms the ternary complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of Kd(dNTP) (step 2). A global rearrangement of the ternary structure in which the fingers domain moves closer to the DNA aligns the active site for polymerization at a rate of kpol (step 3). This rearranged species of Pol β is denoted as β*. The fingers domain reopens and releases the extended DNA product at a rate of kss, which is the rate-limiting step (step 4) (36).

Pol β is known to misincorporate an incorrect nucleotide once in every 10,000 base insertions (10). The efficiency of incorrect incorporation is increased in several Pol β variants that exhibit a mutator phenotype (1115). Previous fluorescence studies with Pol β performed by us (16) and others (1719) observed movements of Pol β associated with DNA synthesis using a 2-aminopurine reporter in the DNA along with the single Trp residue in the fingers domain. These studies, which did not monitor FRET, suggest that there is a step prior to chemistry that is not rate-limiting for DNA synthesis by Pol β, which is likely associated with fingers closing. Many of these studies were conducted on a recessed DNA substrate, which is not the physiologically relevant substrate for Pol β (20, 21), as Pol β prefers single nucleotide-gapped DNA. Given these limitations, we developed a FRET-based approach to monitor the movements of the fingers domain during DNA synthesis by Pol β, using a single nucleotide-gapped DNA substrate.

Our results reveal that there is a rapid closing of the fingers domain in the presence of the correct nucleotide, followed by an additional and not previously identified non-covalent step that precedes chemistry and product release. The conformational changes we observe with correct dNTP incorporation are absent in the presence of the incorrect dNTP, suggesting that Pol β catalysis is different for incorporation of correct versus incorrect nucleotides.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Deoxyoligonucleotides and DNA sequences used in this paper are described (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

One base pair gap DNA substrate used in this study

The bold, underlined base is the templating base. The X marks the Dabcyl residue.

DNA sequence Sub strate
5′-GCCTCGCAGCCGGCTGATGCGCGTCGGTCGATCCAATGCCGTCC T:3′OHa
CGGAGCGTCGGCCGACTACGCGGCAGCCAGCTAGGTTACGGCAGG-5′
5′-GCCTCGCAGCCGGCAGATGCGC GTCGGTCGATCCAATGCCGTCC T(−8)D:3′OHb
CGGAGCGTCGGCCGXCTACGCGGCAGCCAGCTAGGTTACGGCAGG-5′
5′-GCCTCGCAGCCGGCAGATGCGCH GTCGGTCGATCCAATGCCGTCC T:3′Hc
CGGAGCGTCGGCCGTCTACGCGGCAGCCAGCTAGGTTACGGCAGG-5′
5′-GCCTCGCAGCCGGCAGATGCGCH GTCGGTCGATCCAATGCCGTCC T(−8)D:3′Hd
CGGAGCGTCGGCCGXCTACGCGGCAGCCAGCTAGGTTACGGCAGG-5′

a T:3′OH is the extendable DNA substrate without a Dabcyl residue.

b T(−8)D:3′OH is extendable DNA substrate with a Dabcyl residue at the −8 position from the templating base.

c T:3′H is non-extendable DNA substrate without a Dabcyl residue.

d T(−8)D:3′H is non-extendable DNA substrate with a Dabcyl residue at the −8 position from the templating base.

Generation of C239S/C267C/V303C Pol β

Wild-type (WT) human DNA polymerase β contains three endogenous cysteine residues. The mutations of Cys-239 and Cys-267 to serines were introduced into a tagless, human WT Pol β (modified pET28a) by site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene) and did not affect Pol β function (Table 2). An additional residue change by site-directed mutagenesis converted Val-303 to Cys to facilitate thiol-reactive labeling with ((((2-iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (IAEDANS).

TABLE 2.

Activity of modified Pol β

Pol β Residue 178 Residue 239 Residue 267 kobsa
s1
WT C C C 13 ± 2
178S/239S Ser Ser C Highly unstable
178S/267S Ser C Ser No burst
239S/267S C Ser Ser 12 ± 2
178S/239S/267S Ser Ser Ser No burst

a Reactions were carried out with 100 μm Pol β and 300 μm T:3′OH using 100 μm dCTP as described under “Experimental Procedures.”

Expression and Purification of Modified Pol β

Plasmid containing the modified Pol β gene was expressed in bacteria as previously described (22). Protein was stored at 4 °C until labeling. Pol β protein may be stored in 15% glycerol at −80 °C for several months with a subsequent thaw and labeling with no effect on Pol β activity.

Labeling of Modified Pol β

The selection of the fluorophore/quencher pair as well as the procedure for labeling was adapted from Joyce et al. (23). The protein was kept at 4 °C during the labeling process. Approximately 100 μm Pol β was reduced with 1 mm dithiothreitol (DTT) for 45 min. The DTT was removed from the sample by gel filtration using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and exchanged into Buffer C (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 100 mm NaCl, 150 μm Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine-HCl (Thermo Scientific)) following the manufacturer's spin protocol. A 10 mm stock of IAEDANS was prepared in Buffer D (100 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, and 100 mm NaCl). A total of 500 μm IAEDANS solution was slowly added to 100 μm Pol β and allowed to react for 16–18 h at 4 °C. The reaction was stopped with the addition of 0.5 mm DTT and incubation for 20 min. The protein mixture was separated from free IAEDANS by a second PD-10 column (following gravity protocol) and exchanged into Buffer C. Fractions of 500 μl were collected, UV-visible analyzed at 336 and 280 nm, and concentrated to a final concentration of ∼60–100 μm. Samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and stained with either Coomassie or viewed under UV light (Fig. 2, A and B). A protein preparation containing the C239S/C267S mutation was labeled in conjunction with V303C to ensure that Cys-178 was not labeled. Fig. 2, A and B, demonstrates that the thiol reaction occurred only at position 303. The labeling was determined to be greater than 89%. For simplicity, the modified, labeled WT is referred to as Pol β-AEDANS.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Labeling protein constructs with IAEDANS. Fluorescence image is shown in A and Coomassie staining of the same 10% PAGE gel in B. Pol β V303C-AEDANS is shown in lanes 1 and 3; the Cys-178 Pol β protein is in lanes 2 and 4. Cys-178 Pol β protein contains a single Cys at position 178. Note that Cys-178 is not fluorescent and is therefore not labeled with IAEDANS. C, circular dichroism spectra of unlabeled Pol β, Pol β V303C-AEDANS, and Cys-178. Data were normalized to unlabeled Pol β.

DNA Substrates

Deoxyoligonucleotides for the one-base gapped DNA, including the Dabcyl-T modified DNA, were purchased from the Keck Oligo Synthesis Resource (Yale University) and purified by PAGE (Table 1). Deoxyoligonucleotides were annealed together to form the preferred DNA substrate of Pol β, as previously described (24). For consistency, nomenclature for the DNA substrates is as described by Joyce et al. (23).

Rapid Chemical Quench Experiments

Chemical quench experiments were carried out on a RQF-3 KinTek Chemical Quench Flow apparatus. A solution of 100 nm protein and 300 nm 32P-labeled, one-base gapped DNA (Table 1) were mixed with 100 μm dCTP and 10 mm MgCl2. All mixtures contained reaction buffer E (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 100 mm NaCl, and 10% glycerol) and were allowed to react for 0.2 to 3 s at 37 °C. Reactions were quenched with 0.5 m EDTA and 90% formamide sequencing dye. Radioactive products were separated on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, observed on a Storm 860 PhosphorImager, and quantified based on n and n+1 products using ImageQuant software. The data were fitted to the following biphasic burst equation using Prism 6 GraphPad software.

graphic file with name zbc02314-8714-m01.jpg

Unlabeled WT Pol β was assayed DNA substrate T:3′OH. IAEDANS-labeled Pol β (Pol β-AEDANS) was studied on T(−8)D:3′OH (Table 1).

Enzyme Titration

To determine optimal single turnover conditions, various concentrations of Pol β-AEDANS (500 to 2000 nm) were reacted with 100 nm T(−8)D:3′OH and 100 μm dCTP for 0.03 to 10 s. Reactions were quenched with 0.5 m EDTA and 90% formamide sequencing dye. Radioactive products were separated on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel as described above. The data were fitted to the following single exponential equation using Prism 6 GraphPad software.

graphic file with name zbc02314-8714-m02.jpg

Here, kobs is the observed rate at each concentration of enzyme.

Single-turnover Experiments

Pol β-AEDANS and radiolabeled T(−6)D:3′OH were assayed on the KinTek apparatus to determine kpol and Kd(dNTP) at 37 °C. Correct nucleotide (dCTP) was titrated from 0.5 to 200 μm over a range of 0.03 to 10 s with 500 nm Pol β and 50 nm DNA. Radioactive products were separated on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel and quantified as described above. Using Prism 6, the data were fitted to a single exponential equation, where kobs is the observed rate constant at each concentration of dNTP. The rates (kobs) are plotted against concentration of dNTP and fitted to the hyperbolic equation,

graphic file with name zbc02314-8714-m03.jpg

kpol is the maximum rate of polymerization and Kd(dNTP) is the equilibrium dissociation constant for the incoming dNTP.

Circular Dichroism

The secondary structural characteristics of unlabeled Pol β, Pol β-AEDANS, and Cys-178 were analyzed by circular dichroism as previously described (24). The ellipicity of 3 μm labeled protein solution was normalized to 3 μm unlabeled Pol β.

Fluorescence Emission Scan

The fluorescence of Pol β-AEDANS (600 nm) was observed at room temperature on the Photon Technology International spectrofluorometer in Buffer F (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7, 10 mm MgCl2, and 1 mm EDTA). The sample was excited at 336 nm and an emission scan was performed from 380 to 650 nm. The DNA substrate T(−8)D:3′H was added to the protein mixture and scanned, followed by the addition of 100 μm dCTP (correct) or 500 μm dATP (incorrect).

Stopped-flow Fluorescence

In all experiments, the sample was excited at 336 nm, the emissions were filtered with a 400-nm filter, and the voltage was fixed at 400 V. Pol β-AEDANS was assayed along with Dabcyl-labeled DNA substrate (see figure legends for specific DNA used) in the stopped-flow SX-19 (Applied Photophysics) at 37 °C. Under single turnover conditions, 500 nm Pol β was co-incubated with 200 nm T(−8)D:3′H or 100 nm T(−8)D:3′OH in buffer E and then rapidly mixed in the stopped-flow instrument with various concentrations of dNTP as detailed in the Figure legends. In some experiments, MgCl2 was exchanged for CaCl2. Data collection began as soon as mixing occurred (pre-trigger setting). Fluorescent signal artifacts from the flow and mixing of the solutions were removed from the traces (0–0.0308 s) based on the results from standardized reactions (25). A logarithmic data collection of 500 time points over 10 s was evaluated for each mixing event with five traces per dNTP concentration that were averaged together.

KinTek Explorer Fitting

Rate constants were determined by KinTek Explorer Professional Version 3 (26, 27). Raw data were imported into the program as a concentration series. The data were plotted a logarithmic time scale and plot residuals were used to ensure a precise fit. In addition, concentration series offset (addition/subtraction) was added to the simulation. The observables were noted as,

graphic file with name zbc02314-8714-m04.jpg

where the observables reflect the presence of protein [E]. The Kd(dNTP) was confirmed using the following equation,

graphic file with name zbc02314-8714-m05.jpg

where k and k+ correspond to the rate constants determined by KinTek Explorer.

A nonlinear regression equation was used to initially estimate the fit of the raw stopped-flow data. In instances where the non-covalent step was absent (Fig. 8A), the analytic function f(t) = a1 × exp(−b1 × t) + c, was used. When the non-covalent step was present (Figs. 5, A and B, and 8B), the function f(t) = a1 × exp(−b1 × t) + a2 × exp(−b2 × t) + c was used. Data for extendable DNA (Fig. 7A) was estimated to a quadruple exponential equation. The data were fit by KinTek Explorer to the best possible fit and constrained by standard error and chemical quench data (Fig. 3) (26). The non-covalent step was further defined by one-dimensional FitSpace calculation of 5.5–25.5 s−1 (27).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

The non-covalent step is dependent on the presence of a free primer 3′OH group and the catalytic Mg2+. A, Pol β V303C-AEDANS and non-extendable Dabcyl-T DNA (T(−8)D:3′H) were mixed with increasing concentrations of dNTP (correct, dCTP) and CaCl2 was substituted for MgCl2. B, Pol β V303C-AEDANS was analyzed using stopped-flow fluorescence, similar to A with the exception of T(−8)D:3′OH, extendable DNA. In all experiments, n = 5. KinTek Explorer fits are represented by the dashed line.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Stopped-flow fluorescence of Pol β V303C-AEDANS in the absence of chemistry demonstrates fingers closing. A, a solution of Pol β V303C-AEDANS and non-extendable Dabcyl-T DNA (T(−8)D:3′H) in a 2.5:1 protein to DNA ratio was rapidly mixed with increasing correct dCTP to give the final concentrations at the right. B, similar to the experiment in A, the dNTP substrate was replaced with the non-hydrolyzable dCpCpp analog and T(−8)D:3′OH was used for stopped-flow fluorescence experiments. In all experiments, n = 5. KinTek Explorer fits are represented by the dashed line.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

The fingers domain closes in the presence of correct dNTP, but not in the presence of incorrect dNTP. A, Pol β V303C-AEDANS and extendable Dabcyl-T DNA (T(−8)D:3′OH) were mixed with increasing concentrations of correct dCTP in single turnover conditions. The stopped-flow fluorescence traces were globally fit to a five-step model. Misincorporation of Pol β V303C-AEDANS was analyzed using stopped-flow fluorescence, similar to A with the exception of increasing incorrect concentrations of dATP (B) and dTTP (C). In all experiments, n = 5. KinTek Explorer fits are represented by the dashed line.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Pol β V303C-AEDANS displays similar biphasic burst activity and single turnover kinetics as unlabeled Pol β. A, pre-steady-state kinetics of WT (Pol β) unlabeled Pol β (circles) and labeled Pol β V303C-AEDANS (squares) with one-base gapped DNA. Both unlabeled and labeled enzymes experience a fast pre-steady-state burst rate of 13 ± 2 and 14 ± 2 s−1, respectively. Labeled Pol β retains its fast polymerization rate. B, a single turnover plot of products formed versus time to determine the kobs for each dNTP concentration shown on the right. C, the kobs were plotted versus correct (dCTP) concentration to determine the kpol rate of 12 s−1 and a Kd(dNTP) of 1.4 μm. Inset shows concentrations up to 25 μm.

RESULTS

IAEDANS-labeled Pol β and Dabcyl-labeled DNA

We designed a FRET-based approach for monitoring fingers movement of Pol β, based on previous work with DNA polymerase I (23). We chose to label Pol β with the thiol reactive IAEDANS in the fingers domain, and to label the DNA template with Dabcyl. Quenching of fluorescence will occur upon finger closure, as the fingers move toward the Dabcyl in the DNA, according to crystal structures of the open binary and closed ternary complexes. Pol β contains three endogenous Cys residues at positions 178, 239, and 267; none of which would be appropriate for accurately reporting the fingers movement. An initial characterization of Pol β C239S and Pol β C267S, in which either Cys-239 or Cys-267 were altered to Ser, or of the double mutant (C239S,C267S) indicated that altering these residues to Ser would not affect the overall Pol β function (Table 2). However, alteration of Cys-178 to Ser affected activity (Table 2), and we thus elected not to alter this residue. Val-303, located on a small loop in the fingers domain, was mutated to a Cys residue that could react with the IAEDANS (Fig. 1A). The placement of the Dabcyl quencher on the DNA was carefully selected to maintain an appropriate Förster distance of about 40 Å. A Dabcyl-T was inserted eight bases downstream (−8) from the single nucleotide gap, which provided an optimal distance for observing FRET (Table 1 and Fig. 1, A and B).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Crystal structure of human DNA polymerase β (Protein Data Bank codes 3ISB and 4KLE). A, Pol β contains four domains (3ISB): the 8-kDa domain (yellow), thumb domain (blue), palm domain (green), and the fingers domain (red). B, a rotation of 180° of the crystal structure reveals the distance between the IAEDANS and Dabcyl to be 43.1 Å in the open, binary complex (3ISB). Residue 303 on the fingers domain is labeled with IAEDANS and the DNA is labeled with Dabcyl-T 8 bases away from the gap (−8). C, in the closed, ternary complex, IAEDANS and Dabcyl-T have a calculated distance (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.2r3pre, Schrödinger, LLC.) of 33.7 Å (4KLE).

The Labeled V303C Pol β Variant Has Kinetics Properties Similar to WT Pol β

The variant of Pol β bearing three mutations (C239S, C267S, and V303C) termed V303C, was subcloned into a tagless pET28a expression vector and expressed in Escherichia coli. The purified protein was labeled with IAEDANS similar to previously published protocols (23, 28) and is outlined under “Experimental Procedures.” A control protein termed Cys-178, which harbors only the C239S and C267S alterations with the endogenous Cys-178 maintained, was expressed, purified, and labeled in the same manner. Analysis of a 10% SDS-PAGE gel containing samples of both the IAEDANS-treated V303C and Cys-178 protein preparations detected either by UV or Coomassie staining suggests that the thiol reaction occurs at the Cys-303 position and that Cys-178 is not labeled with IAEDANS (Fig. 2, A and B) presumably because it is buried. To further confirm protein structure, circular dichroism spectroscopy suggests labeled protein preparations retained similar secondary structure characteristics of unlabeled WT Pol β (Fig. 2C).

Pol β V303C-AEDANS was assessed for pre-steady-state burst activity using the extendable T(−8)D:3′OH substrate. The burst rate observed for Pol β V303C-AEDANS (14 s−1) is similar to the burst rate of unlabeled Pol β (13 s−1) on non-labeled DNA (Fig. 3A and Table 2). This rapid rate of 14 s−1 suggests that alteration of Cys-239 and Cys-267 to Ser, as well as the labeling with IAEDANS at position 303, did not affect the overall rate of DNA synthesis catalyzed by Pol β and that the overall rate-limiting step was still product release. We also performed experiments under single turnover conditions using a ratio of 10:1 protein:DNA. These conditions were determined empirically by incubating various concentrations of protein with 100 nm DNA and 100 μm dNTP for various times (11). As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 3, B and C, the kobs, kpol, and Kd(dNTP) for Pol β V303C-AEDANS are similar to unlabeled Pol β (29). In combination, our results show that the Pol β V303C-AEDANS has kinetic properties similar to WT Pol β that are unaffected by the IAEDANS label.

TABLE 3.

Determination of incorporation efficiency for Pol β using rapid chemical methodology

Protein Reactiona kobsb kpolc Kd(dNTP)
s1 μm
Pol β G-dCTP 13 ± 2 8.9 ± 0.3 (29) 1.7 ± 0.3 (29)
Pol β V303C-AEDANS G-dCTP 14 ± 2 12.1 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.3

a All reactions used T(-8)D:3′OH and are reported with mean ± S.D.

b Pre-steady-state reaction rate with 100 μm dCTP.

c Reactions carried out under single turnover conditions.

FRET Is Observed in Steady-state with Pol β V303C-AEDANS and Dabcyl-labeled DNA

To determine whether we could observe a FRET signal with the Pol β V303C-AEDANS and Dabcyl-labeled DNA, we characterized steady-state fluorescence. Upon excitation of the Pol β V303C-AEDANS alone at 336 nm, an emission scan reveals a peak at ∼490 nm (Fig. 4A, red). Upon addition of the non-extendable T(−8)D:3′H Dabcyl-labeled DNA substrate we observed a quench in fluorescence intensity, indicating the formation of a binary complex (Fig. 4A, blue). Upon addition of the correct dNTP (dCTP) we observed greater fluorescence quenching, suggesting that Pol β is in a ternary complex in which the fingers domain moves closer to the Dabcyl in the DNA (Fig. 4A, green). Finally, when an incorrect dNTP (dATP) is added to binary Pol β we observe less of a fluorescence quench compared with that of correct dNTP (Fig. 4A, black). The same experiment was repeated with non-Dabcyl-labeled DNA T:3′H (Fig. 4B). There was little decrease in the fluorescence intensity of Pol β-AEDANS upon addition of T:3′H and both correct or incorrect dNTP, indicating that the quenching seen in Fig. 4A is due to the IAEDANS/Dabcyl FRET pair coming within the Förster radii. These results demonstrate that we are able to observe a FRET signal between the polymerase and DNA in the presence of dNTPs.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Steady-state fluorescence of Pol β-AEDANS in the presence of Dabcyl-DNA and dNTP. A, the fluorescence intensity of 600 μm Pol β V303C-AEDANS (red) is reduced when bound to 100 μm Dabcyl-DNA substrate T(−8)D:3′H (binary complex, blue). The addition of 100 μm correct dNTP (dCTP) opposite template G results in a further reduction in fluorescence intensity (green) suggesting a reduction in distance between the IAEDANS/Dabcyl pair. Less of a reduction in intensity was observed with incorporation of 500 μm incorrect dATP (black). B, steady-state fluorescence of Pol β-AEDANS (red) was repeated as described above with non-Dabcyl-labeled substrate T:3′H (blue) and correct (green) or incorrect (black) dNTP. The minor quenching that is observed is likely due to the presence of dNTP.

Stopped-flow Fluorescence Reveals a Novel Non-covalent Step in the Pol β Catalytic Pathway

To characterize movements of the fingers domain in the absence of phosphoryl transfer we performed stopped-flow fluorescence experiments in which the correct dNTP was mixed with Pol β V303C-AEDANS pre-bound to the non-extendable T(−8)D:3′H DNA substrate (Fig. 5A). In the presence of the correct nucleotide (dCTP), there is a rapid decrease in fluorescence suggesting that during the first 0.1 s, the fingers domain comes within close proximity of the Dabcyl-labeled DNA, such that a quench is observed. Similar traces were observed with extendable T(−8)D:3′OH DNA in the presence of a dCpCpp, a non-hydrolyzable analog of dCTP (Fig. 5B).

The data obtained with the T(−8)D:3′H DNA substrate and correct dNTP were initially fitted with Prism 6 to both single- and double-exponential equations. The residuals indicated that a double-exponential equation was the better fit (Fig. 6, A and B), suggesting that upon binding correct dNTP, these two phases indicate that there are at least two movements. We then employed KinTek Explorer to globally fit all of the stopped-flow fluorescence data (26). In Fig. 6C, we display an example of the fit of a trace using non-extendable DNA and 50 μm dCTP (residuals shown in red). The fit of the entire 10-s trace is shown in logarithmic scale along with an inset of data points collected from 0 to 0.03 s, plotted in linear scale. These data fit to the same kinetic scheme with similar rates as the 10-s trace. Our data are best described by a kinetic scheme in which ED + N ⇌ EDN represents the initial binding of the dCTP (Fig. 6C). A subsequent step of EDN ⇌ END is a conformational change, followed by END ⇌ NDE, a proposed second conformational change.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Double-exponential equation analysis of stopped-flow data suggests a complex kinetic pathway and a non-covalent step. A stopped-flow reaction containing 500 nm Pol β V303C-AEDANS along with 200 nm T(−8)D:3′H were mixed with 50 μm correct dNTP (dCTP). The stopped-flow trace (blue) was fitted to a single-exponential equation (A; green, residuals, inset) or a double-exponential equation (B; black, residuals, inset) using Prism 6 (GraphPad, Inc.). C, a representative image of stopped-flow fluorescence traces of Pol β V303C-AEDANS with T(−8)D:3′H mixed with 50 μm correct dCTP for 10 s globally fit to a three-step kinetic scheme using KinTek Explorer (red, residuals below) and plotted on a logarithmic time scale. The inset highlights the stopped-flow trace from 0 to 0.03 s and plotted on a linear time scale. The kinetic scheme below the graph defines ED + N ⇌ EDN as initial binding of the dCTP. A subsequent step of EDN ⇌ END is a conformational change associated with the fingers closing and the 10 and 0.03 s (inset) trace suggest a value of >100 s−1.

Nucleotide Incorporation follows a Different Pathway for Correct Versus Incorrect Nucleotide

To examine the role of the fingers domain in nucleotide selection, stopped-flow experiments were performed under single turnover conditions with T(−8)D:3′OH and either correct (dCTP) or incorrect (dATP or dTTP) substrates. For correct incorporation, we observed initial quenching of fluorescence followed by a gradual recovery of fluorescence (Fig. 7A). Chemistry is occurring due to the presence of the 3′-OH and dCTP and the increase in fluorescence could reflect chemistry or steps subsequent to chemistry. Stopped-flow traces for incorrect dNTP incorporation significantly differ from those with correct dNTP. There was no change in fluorescence with an incorrect purine or pyrimidine, even when titrating up to 900 μm incorrect dNTPs (Fig. 7, B and C).

KinTek Explorer simulations suggest that the kinetics of correct incorporation are best described by a 5-step kinetic model for Pol β-AEDANS with extendable T(−8)D:3′OH DNA (Fig. 7A) in which Pol β proceeds through: step 2, dNTP binding (ED + N ⇌ EDN); step 3, a conformational change after recognition of the correct dNTP (EDN ⇌ END); step 3.1, a second conformational change (END ⇌ NDE); step 3.2, chemistry (NDE ⇌ EP); step 4, DNA dissociation and product release (EP ⇌ E + P). Due to the linear nature of the stopped-flow trace obtained with an incorrect dNTP (Fig. 7, B and C), we were unable to fit the data to an exponential equation or to model the data with KinTek Explorer.

Table 4 summarizes the estimated relative rates of the reactions in the presence of non-extendable and extendable DNA substrates. Parameters used to constrain our model include chemical quench data as well as 2-AP and stopped-flow rates derived using intrinsic tryptophan residues for Pol β (16, 30, 31). The rate constant k1 represents the dNTP binding event. Importantly, calculation of the Kd(dNTP), as described under “Experimental Procedures” (k−1/k+1), yielded a Kd(dNTP) of 1.9 to 3 μm, which is within the range of previously published Kd(dNTP) for Pol β (29, 32). We suggest that the k+2 rate constant represents the fingers movement toward the DNA. We base our suggestion on the observation of fingers domain movement in the binary versus the ternary Pol β crystal structures (8, 33), our previous fluorescence characterization of Pol β as well as characterization of Pol β, and additional DNA polymerases by others (16, 23, 30, 35). We propose that the k+3 rate constant represents a second non-covalent step following closing of the fingers, mainly because it occurs with both the extendable and non-extendable DNA substrates. The k+4 rate constant is most likely phosphodiester bond formation, because it corresponds to the rate of chemistry, kpol, that we measure in rapid chemical quench flow assays. Furthermore, this rate constant is not present when the primer terminus is not extendable (Table 3). The k+5 rate constant is the overall rate-limiting step of the kinetic pathway and is similar to the steady-state rate previously measured by us and others (36, 37). This likely represents dissociation of Pol β from the DNA. Scheme 2 summarizes these proposed kinetic steps for Pol β.

TABLE 4.

Kinetic rate constants for the Pol β V303C-AEDANS catalytic cycle during nucleotide incorporation

Based on Scheme 2 analyzed by KinTek Explorer.

Rate constanta Modelb T(−8)D:3′H + Mg2+ c T(−8)D:3′OH + dCpCpp T(−8)D:3′OH + Mg2+ T(−8)D:3′H + Ca2+ T(−8)D:3′OH + Ca2+
k+1 ED + N → EDN 11.8 ± 0.64 5.79 ± 0.903 12.1 ± 0.885 35.6 ± 3.07 48.2 ± 3.58
k−1 EDN → ED + N 29.5 132 ± 43.7 36.4 67.7 91.6
k+2 EDN → END 97.8 ± 18.8 166 ± 22.2 121 ± 27.0 116 ± 11.4 224 ± 26.9
k−2 END → EDN (0.01–3.5)d ∼4.02 × 10−10 (0.000730–2.84) (0.999–4.2) ∼7.94 × 10−7
k+3 END → NDE 8.1 ± 5.5 7.89 ± 0.342 17.0 ± 0.179 11.9 ± 0.797
k−3 NDE → END (0.06–6.2)d 1.1 × 10−7 63 ± 11.1 ∼4.50 × 10−7
k+4 NDE → EP 8.92
k−4 EP → NDE 0
k+5 EPE + P 1.28 ± 0.165
k−5 E+P → EP 21.6 ± 4.15

a Rate constants reported in s−1, except where indicated by ‡ (μm−1s−1).

b Model used in KinTek Explorer program where E represents enzyme; D represents DNA; N represents nucleotide.

c The deviations from the rate constant shown are S.E. (26).

d Values represent the range.

SCHEME 2.

SCHEME 2.

Biochemical pathway model for KinTek Explorer simulations. The binary complex of Pol β (E/DNA:ED) is in equilibrium (k−1/k+1) with the nucleotide (N) to form the ternary complex (EDN) and is represented by step 2 in the overall biochemical pathway suggested in Scheme 3. After formation of the ternary complex (EDN), the fingers domain moves closer to the DNA (END), signified by the rate constant k±2 (step 3). A second conformational change occurs in which there is a rearrangement of the active site (NDE), indicated by k±3 (a novel step 3.1). This rearrangement facilitates chemistry (EP) k±4 (step 3.2), followed by product release (step 4) k±5.

Characterization of the Non-covalent Step with Catalytically Inactive Ca2+

To further explore the non-covalent step (k+3), CaCl2 was used in place of MgCl2 in the stopped-flow experiments. Calcium has a larger ionic radius than Mg2+ and does not support phosphoryl transfer (38, 39). In the presence of non-extendable DNA and CaCl2, we observed a fluorescence decrease upon binding to the correct dCTP (Fig. 8A) that could be described by a two-step model using KinTek Explorer (steps 2 and 3 of Scheme 2). In contrast, the fluorescence trace observed with extendable DNA (Fig. 8B) was best described by a three-step model (steps 2, 3, and 3.1 of Scheme 2). These results indicate that in the presence of extendable DNA, the initial fingers domain movement and the non-covalent step are intact in the presence of CaCl2, but that the chemistry step and subsequent product release did not occur due to the inability of CaCl2 to support phosphodiester bond formation. However, the non-covalent step (step 3.1 of Scheme 2) was not observed with CaCl2 and non-extendable DNA. This suggests that the non-covalent step 3.1 requires the presence of a 3′-OH.

DISCUSSION

We have developed a FRET-based system for Pol β, which allows monitoring of movements of the fingers domain during DNA synthesis. Our results provide valuable insight into the movements of the fingers domain during catalysis. We observe that Pol β experiences at least two conformational changes that precede phosphodiester bond formation.

Incorporation of Correct Versus Incorrect Nucleotide by Pol β Is Different

In agreement with published work for Pol β as well as the A-family polymerases (unlike Y-family polymerases (9, 19, 23, 40, 41, 4345), we observe that the initial global movement of the fingers domain is not rate-limiting and this initial domain movement likely plays a critical role in facilitating polymerization. Single molecule experiments have also suggested this to be the case for Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase B1 (46). Importantly, incorrect dNTP binding does not induce any conformational changes with either a pyrimidine or purine within the first 10 to 20 s of the reaction, using FRET to monitor the fingers domain movements. Our results, therefore, suggest that dNTP discrimination occurs at ground state dNTP binding at a point before the fingers have closed. Future fluorescence experiments with mutator variants of Pol β that map to a number of different regions of the protein (see for example, Refs. 4750) will likely provide mechanistic insights into the how fidelity is governed before closure of the fingers. Our previous work suggests that the hinge region plays a role in substrate discrimination (5153) suggesting that the hinge may in some way “sense” the presence of correct versus incorrect dNTP during its initial contact with the fingers domain, and rotate toward a closed complex only if correct dNTP is bound.

A Novel Non-covalent Step in the Pol β Kinetic Pathway

The determination of rates from stopped-flow experiments was supported by chemical quench analysis. Our data, with all DNA substrates and metals, report a Kd(dNTP) of 1.9–3 μm dCTP. We measured the Kd(dNTP) for the labeled protein under single turnover conditions and found it to be 1.4 μm (Table 3), which is similar to k+1/k−1 determined with KinTek Explorer and is confirmed by our own previously published chemical quench data of human Pol β on this particular substrate (T:3′OH-, Table 3, and Scheme 2, step 2) (29, 32). Step 3 corresponds to the rapid fingers closing, which is >100 s−1 in the presence of Mg2+. We have constrained this step using previously published fast rate constants (16, 30, 31). Due to the complexity of the stopped-flow traces, we used KinTek Explorer to reveal an additional step that immediately precedes chemistry (step 3.1) that occurs with an upper limit of 25 s−1 that has not been previously characterized. This step is remarkably absent with the non-extendable T(−8)D:3′H DNA substrate in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 8A, Table 4). The new results emerging from this work call for an expansion of Scheme 1 for the pathway of nucleotide incorporation by Pol β, including a non-covalent step that may facilitate chemistry as shown in Scheme 3.

SCHEME 3.

SCHEME 3.

Revised biochemical pathway of nucleotide incorporation of Pol β based on FRET data. The overall formation of the binary and ternary states of Pol β are the same as described in Scheme 1. Additional steps occur after the formation of the ternary complex to include the fingers domain closing (β*, step 3), followed by a rearrangement at the active site (β, step 3.1) to set up for polymerization (step 3.2). The rate-limiting step remains the product release rate of kss (step 4) (36).

A non-covalent step has not been identified in previous studies with Pol β, although there is precedence for a non-covalent step in the kinetic pathways of the Klenow fragment and Klentaq1 (23, 54, 55) as well as the Y-family DNA polymerase, Dpo4 (40). Step 3.1 (step 3.1, Scheme 2) is of particular interest as it suggests a further rearrangement after fingers closing, but just prior to chemistry, which was not previously observed for Pol β using 2-AP and Trp.

We further explored the non-covalent step 3.1 by replacing Mg2+ with Ca2+. Calcium is larger than Mg2+ and generally cannot support phosphoryl transfer (38, 56). Pol β uses a two-metal ion mechanism (57, 58) for catalysis in which two metal ions participate in the reaction and coordinate the catalytic triad of three aspartate residues, Asp-190, Asp-192, and Asp-256. The catalytic metal A (MgA) lowers the pKa of the primer terminus, leading to attack on the α-phosphate of the incoming dNTP substrate. Metal B coordinates the non-bridging oxygens on the dNTP substrate and as a result neutralizes the negative charge that develops during chemistry (58, 59). The data observed with extendable DNA and CaCl2 were modeled to a three-step pathway whereby step 3.1 was unaffected. However, the stopped-flow data with non-extendable DNA and Ca2+ resulted in a poor fit to the same three-step model indicating that the non-covalent step is abolished under these conditions. This observation of the non-covalent step (step 3.1), taken together with the non-hydrolyzable analog data and the observation that step 3 (fingers closing) was similar with Ca2+ and Mg2+, may be a result of a rearrangement of the active site (Asp-256, Asp-190, and Asp-192) during the binding of metal A, as recently suggested (23, 34, 39, 42, 55). Other possibilities include local rearrangement of active site side chains as recently suggested (44).

In summary, we have developed a FRET system to study the movements of the fingers domain of Pol β. We have demonstrated that the fingers domain closes rapidly following correct dNTP selection, and observed a non-covalent step that occurs just prior to chemistry. We provide further evidence that this conformational change is associated with binding of the catalytic metal into the polymerase active site. Moreover, our data show that Pol β discriminates between correct and incorrect nucleotides in a different manner. Our work provides novel insight into the mechanism of selection and fidelity by the human repair DNA polymerase β.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Catherine Joyce for assistance with the initial setup of this project.

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants CA 080830 (to J. B. S.), GM49551 (to K. S. A.), and GM099289 (to C. D. S.).

2
The abbreviations used are:
BER
base excision repair
Pol
DNA polymerase
IAEDANS-5
((((2-iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid
AP
abasic
APE1
AP endonuclease 1.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Barnes D. E., Lindahl T. (2004) Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 445–476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wiederhold L., Leppard J. B., Kedar P., Karimi-Busheri F., Rasouli-Nia A., Weinfeld M., Tomkinson A. E., Izumi T., Prasad R., Wilson S. H., Mitra S., Hazra T. K. (2004) AP endonuclease-independent DNA base excision repair in human cells. Mol. Cell 15, 209–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yamtich J., Sweasy J. B. (2010) DNA polymerase family X: function, structure, and cellular roles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 1136–1150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Prasad R., Beard W. A., Strauss P. R., Wilson S. H. (1998) Human DNA polymerase β deoxyribose phosphate lyase. Substrate specificity and catalytic mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15263–15270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Matsumoto Y., Kim K. (1995) Excision of deoxyribose phosphate residues by DNA polymerase β during DNA repair. Science 269, 699–702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pelletier H., Sawaya M. R., Wolfle W., Wilson S. H., Kraut J. (1996) Crystal structures of human DNA polymerase beta complexed with DNA: implications for catalytic mechanism, processivity, and fidelity. Biochemistry 35, 12742–12761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sawaya M. R., Pelletier H., Kumar A., Wilson S. H., Kraut J. (1994) Crystal structure of rat DNA polymerase β: evidence for a common polymerase mechanism. Science 264, 1930–1935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sawaya M. R., Prasad R., Wilson S. H., Kraut J., Pelletier H. (1997) Crystal Structures of human DNA polymerase β complexed with gapped and nicked DNA: evidence for an induced fit mechanism. Biochemistry 36, 11205–11215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Vande Berg B. J., Beard W. A., Wilson S. H. (2001) DNA structure and aspartate 276 influence nucleotide binding to human DNA polymerase β: implication for the identity of the rate-limiting conformational change. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3408–3416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kunkel T. A. (1985) The mutational specificity of DNA polymerase-β during in vitro DNA synthesis: production of frameshift, base substitution, and deletion mutations. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 5787–5796 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li S.-X., Vaccaro J. A., Sweasy J. B. (1999) Involvement of phenylalanine 272 of DNA polymerase β in discriminating between correct and incorrect deoxynucleoside triphosphates. Biochemistry 38, 4800–4808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kosa J. L., Sweasy J. B. (1999) The E249K mutator mutant of DNA polymerase β extends mispaired termini. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35866–35872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shah A. M., Conn D. A., Li S.-X., Capaldi A., Jäger J., Sweasy J. B. (2001) A DNA polymerase β mutator mutant with reduced nucleotide discrimination and increased protein stability. Biochemistry 40, 11372–11381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Murphy D. L., Donigan K. A., Jaeger J., Sweasy J. B. (2012) The E288K colon tumor variant of DNA polymerase β is a sequence specific mutator. Biochemistry 51, 5269–5275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Opresko P. L., Sweasy J. B., Eckert K. A. (1998) The mutator form of polymerase β with amino acid substitution at tyrosine 265 in the hinge region displays an increase in both base substitution and frame shift errors. Biochemistry 37, 2111–2119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shah A. M., Li S.-X., Anderson K. S., Sweasy J. B. (2001) Y265H mutator mutant of DNA polymerase β: proper teometric alignment is critical for fidelity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10824–10831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Balbo P. B., Wang E. C., Tsai M.-D. (2011) Kinetic mechanism of active site assembly and chemical catalysis of DNA polymerase β. Biochemistry 50, 9865–9875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bakhtina M., Lee S., Wang Y., Dunlap C., Lamarche B., Tsai M.-D. (2005) Use of viscogens, dNTPαS, and rhodium(III) as probes in stopped-flow experiments to obtain new evidence for the mechanism of catalysis by DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 44, 5177–5187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhong X., Patel S. S., Werneburg B. G., Tsai M.-D. (1997) DNA polymerase β: multiple conformational changes in the mechanism of catalysis. Biochemistry 36, 11891–11900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chagovetz A. M., Sweasy J. B., Preston B. D. (1997) Increased activity and fidelity of DNA polymerase β on single-nucleotide gapped DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27501–27504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Singhal R. K., Wilson S. H. (1993) Short gap-filling synthesis by DNA polymerase β is processive. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15906–15911 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Eckenroth B. E., Towle-Weicksel J. B., Sweasy J. B., Doublié S. (2013) The E295K cancer variant of human polymerase β favors the mismatch conformational pathway during nucleotide selection. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34850–34860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Joyce C. M., Potapova O., Delucia A. M., Huang X., Basu V. P., Grindley N. D. (2008) Fingers-closing and other rapid conformational changes in DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) and their role in nucleotide selectivity. Biochemistry 47, 6103–6116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Murphy D. L., Kosa J., Jaeger J., Sweasy J. B. (2008) The Asp285 variant of DNA polymerase β extends mispaired primer termini via increased nucleotide binding. Biochemistry 47, 8048–8057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Peterman B. F. (1979) Measurement of the dead time of a fluorescence stopped-flow instrument. Anal. Biochem. 93, 442–444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Johnson K. A., Simpson Z. B., Blom T. (2009) Global kinetic explorer: a new computer program for dynamic simulation and fitting of kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 387, 20–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Johnson K. A., Simpson Z. B., Blom T. (2009) FitSpace explorer: an algorithm to evaluate multidimensional parameter space in fitting kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 387, 30–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Perumal S. K., Ren W., Lee T. H., Benkovic S. J. (2013) How a holoenzyme for DNA replication is formed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 99–104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Klvaňa M., Murphy D. L., Jeřábek P., Goodman M. F., Warshel A., Sweasy J. B., Florián J. (2012) Catalytic effects of mutations of distant protein residues in human DNA polymerase β: theory and experiment. Biochemistry 51, 8829–8843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Dunlap C. A., Tsai M.-D. (2002) Use of 2-aminopurine and tryptophan fluorescence as probes in kinetic analyses of DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 41, 11226–11235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bakhtina M., Roettger M. P., Kumar S., Tsai M.-D. (2007) A unified kinetic mechanism applicable to multiple DNA polymerases. Biochemistry 46, 5463–5472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nemec A. A., Murphy D. L., Donigan K. A., Sweasy J. B. (2014) The S229L colon tumor-associated variant of DNA polymerase β induces cellular transformation as a result of decreased polymerization efficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 13708–13716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pelletier H., Sawaya M. R., Kumar A., Wilson S. H., Kraut J. (1994) Structures of ternary complexes of rat DNA polymerase β, a DNA template-primer, and ddCTP. Science 264, 1891–1903 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nakamura T., Zhao Y., Yamagata Y., Hua Y. J., Yang W. (2012) Watching DNA polymerase η make a phosphodiester bond. Nature 487, 196–201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li Y., Korolev S., Waksman G. (1998) Crystal structures of open and closed forms of binary and ternary complexes of the large fragment of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I: structural basis for nucleotide incorporation. EMBO J. 17, 7514–7525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Murphy D. L., Jaeger J., Sweasy J. B. (2011) A triad interaction in the fingers subdomain of DNA polymerase β controls polymerase activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6279–6287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ahn J., Werneburg B. G., Tsai M.-D. (1997) DNA polymerase β: structure-fidelity relationship from pre-steady-state kinetic analyses of all possible correct and incorrect base pairs for wild type and R283A mutant. Biochemistry 36, 1100–1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Xia S., Wang M., Blaha G., Konigsberg W. H., Wang J. (2011) Structural insights into complete metal ion coordination from ternary complexes of B family RB69 DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 50, 9114–9124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Freudenthal B. D., Beard W. A., Shock D. D., Wilson S. H. (2013) Observing a DNA polymerase choose right from wrong. Cell 154, 157–168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Xu C., Maxwell B. A., Brown J. A., Zhang L., Suo Z. (2009) Global conformational dynamics of a Y-family DNA polymerase during catalysis. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Yang W. (2003) Damage repair DNA polymerases Y. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13, 23–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Basu R. S., Murakami K. S. (2013) Watching the bacteriophage N4 RNA polymerase transcription by time-dependent soak-trigger-freeze x-ray crystallography. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 3305–3311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sucato C. A., Upton T. G., Kashemirov B. A., Osuna J., Oertell K., Beard W. A., Wilson S. H., Florián J., Warshel A., McKenna C. E., Goodman M. F. (2008) DNA polymerase β fidelity: halomethylene-modified leaving groups in pre-steady-state kinetic analysis reveal differences at the chemical transition state. Biochemistry 47, 870–879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rothwell P. J., Mitaksov V., Waksman G. (2005) Motions of the fingers subdomain of Klentaq1 are fast and not rate limiting: implications for the molecular basis of fidelity in DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell 19, 345–355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Joyce C. M., Benkovic S. J. (2004) DNA polymerase fidelity: kinetics, structure, and checkpoints. Biochemistry 43, 14317–14324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Maxwell B. A., Suo Z. (2013) Single-molecule investigation of substrate binding kinetics and protein conformational dynamics of a B-family replicative DNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 11590–11600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Starcevic D., Dalal S., Sweasy J. (2005) Hinge residue Ile260 of DNA polymerase β is important for enzyme activity and fidelity. Biochemistry 44, 3775–3784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Maitra M., Gudzelak A., Jr., Li S. X., Matsumoto Y., Eckert K. A., Jager J., Sweasy J. B. (2002) Threonine 79 is a hinge residue that governs the fidelity of DNA polymerase β by helping to position the DNA within the active site. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 35550–35560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lin G. C., Jaeger J., Sweasy J. B. (2007) Loop II of DNA polymerase β is important for polymerization activity and fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 2924–2935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Yamtich J., Starcevic D., Lauper J., Smith E., Shi I., Rangarajan S., Jaeger J., Sweasy J. B. (2010) Hinge residue I174 is critical for proper dNTP selection by DNA polymerase β. Biochemistry 49, 2326–2334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Lin G. C., Jaeger J., Eckert K. A., Sweasy J. B. (2009) Loop II of DNA polymerase β is important for discrimination during substrate binding. DNA Repair 8, 182–189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gridley C. L., Rangarajan S., Firbank S., Dalal S., Sweasy J. B., Jaeger J. (2013) Structural changes in the hydrophobic hinge region adversely affect the activity and fidelity of the I260Q mutator DNA polymerase β. Biochemistry 52, 4422–4432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Starcevic D., Dalal S., Jaeger J., Sweasy J. B. (2005) The hydrophobic hinge region of rat DNA polymerase β is critical for substrate binding pocket geometry. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 28388–28393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Rothwell P. J., Waksman G. (2007) A pre-equilibrium before nucleotide binding limits fingers subdomain closure by Klentaq1. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 28884–28892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bermek O., Grindley N. D., Joyce C. M. (2011) Distinct roles of the active-site Mg2+ ligands, Asp-882 and Asp-705, of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) during the prechemistry conformational transitions. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 3755–3766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Pelletier H., Sawaya M. R. (1996) Characterization of the metal ion binding helix-hairpin-helix motifs in human DNA polymerase β by x-ray structural analysis. Biochemistry 35, 12778–12787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Brautigam C. A., Steitz T. A. (1998) Structural and functional insights provided by crystal structures of DNA polymerases and their substrate complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 54–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Beese L. S., Steitz T. A. (1991) Structural basis for the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I: a two metal ion mechanism. EMBO J. 10, 25–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Batra V. K., Beard W. A., Shock D. D., Krahn J. M., Pedersen L. C., Wilson S. H. (2006) Magnesium-induced assembly of a complete DNA polymerase catalytic complex. Structure 14, 757–766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES