Abstract
According to live-cell calcium-imaging experiments, the Sec61 complex is a passive calcium-leak channel in the human endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane that is regulated by ER luminal immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (BiP) and cytosolic Ca2+-calmodulin. In single channel measurements, the open Sec61 complex is Ca2+ permeable. It can be closed not only by interaction with BiP or Ca2+-calmodulin, but also with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A which can enter human cells by retrograde transport. Exotoxin A has been shown to interact with the Sec61 complex and, thereby, inhibit ER export of immunogenic peptides into the cytosol. Here, we show that Exotoxin A also inhibits passive Ca2+ leakage from the ER in human cells, and we characterized the N-terminus of the Sec61 α-subunit as the relevant binding site for Exotoxin A.
Keywords: ER calcium leakage, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A, Sec61 complex, calcium homeostasis, endoplasmic reticulum
Introduction
Transport of precursor polypeptides into and calcium ions (Ca2+) out of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is mediated by the so-called translocon and it must be regulated in mammalian cells with high fidelity to prevent fatal signaling. Therefore, the translocon, which represents a dynamic entrance into the lumen of the ER is regulated by proteins that modulate the structure of the central Sec61 channel from the open to the closed state, and vice versa. The Sec61 complex is a passive calcium-leak channel. On the cytosolic side, it is closed by calcium-calmodulin (Ca2+-CaM) which acts near an IQ motif in the N-terminus, and on the luminal side, it is closed by immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (BiP), which acts on loop 7 of the Sec61 α-subunit (Fig. 1).1-3 BiP activity is mediated by ER-resident Hsp40s via their J-domains, which show high affinity for the ATP-bound form of BiP and focus the ATPase cycle and subsequent substrate binding capability near the luminal exit site of the translocon. A further mediator of the closed state is the ER membrane protein Sec62, which interacts with the N terminus of the pore-forming Sec61 α-subunit.4 All interactions prevent calcium efflux through the ion-conducting Sec61 channel. Interestingly, all interactions occur near the connections of transmembrane segments 2/3 and 7/8 of Sec61α which are believed to form the lateral gate of the pore into the lipid bilayer of the ER-membrane. Mammalian Sec61 complexes have also been described as the ER-export sites for immunogenic peptides that were originally imported into the ER via the transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP), and for certain bacterial toxins, such as Exotoxin A and Cholera toxin, which are bacterially secreted ADP-ribosyltransferases that enter the eukaryotic cytosol by retrograde exocytosis.5-7 We previously observed in planar lipid bilayer experiments that after Sec61 complexes are activated by a precursor polypeptide, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A modulates the gating properties of the open Sec61 channels in nanomolar concentrations and with a preference for the luminal side of the complex.8
Figure 1. Various protein-protein interactions are involved in gating of the Sec61-complex in the human ER membrane. The interactions of BiP and Ca2+-CaM with Sec61α and of Sec62 with Sec61α and Sec63 as well as their sensitivities to mutations and small molecules, respectively, were previously described.3,14,16 The BiP-Sec63 interaction was described by Tyedmers et al. and the effect of the R197E mutation by Awad et al.17,18 So far, the latter interaction as well as the Sec62-Sec63 interaction were found to be relevant only for protein transport into the ER, i.e., gating of the Sec61 complex from the closed to the open conformation;19 in contrast, the BiP co-chaperone for gating to the closed state is still elusive.3 See text for details. Interactions are indicated by arrows, the transmembrane helices that form the lateral gate are shown in light blue, the cytosolic and ER luminal loops, which form the binding sites for ribosomes and BiP, respectively, are indicated. NBD, nucleotide binding domain; SBD, substrate binding domain.
Here, we used live-cell calcium-imaging to characterize the interaction of Exotoxin A with the translocon. We observed that a sublethal dose of Exotoxin A lowers the passive Ca2+ efflux through the Sec61 complex. We also determined the Exotoxin A binding site on the Sec61 α-subunit by using a variety of biochemical approaches. Based on our results, we propose that Exotoxin A acts on the Sec61 α-subunit in a manner similar to that of the physiological regulator Ca2+-CaM.
Results
Live-cell calcium-imaging was previously established to verify the respective effects of modulatory substances and proteins on ER-calcium leakage via the Sec61 complex.9,10 We used this approach to investigate the effect of low concentrations of Exotoxin A on the ER-calcium leakage from the ER of HeLa cells. When the cells were incubated for 10 min with Exotoxin A (30 nM) at 37°C and ER-calcium leakage was unmasked by thapsigargin the amount of calcium efflux was lower compared with the control cells (Fig. 2A). To verify that this effect was not due to decreased Ca2+ loading of the ER, ionomycin was applied. Exotoxin A appeared to have a very small stimulatory effect on ER Ca2+ loading (Fig. 2B). Thus, Exotoxin A showed a direct inhibitory effect on the ER Ca2+ leakage in HeLa cells, most likely by direct interaction.
Figure 2. Exotoxin A interferes with passive calcium efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum of HeLa cells. (A) Live-cell Ca2+ imaging was performed in the presence or absence of 30 nM Exotoxin A. Ca2+ release was unmasked by adding thapsigargin in the presence of external EGTA. Average values are shown with standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Bar diagram depicts statistical analysis of the changes in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations after addition of thapsigargin. (B) Live-cell Ca2+ imaging was performed in the presence or absence of 30 nM Exotoxin A. Total Ca2+ content of the cells was measured by applying ionomycin. Bar diagram depicts the statistical analysis of the changes in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration after addition of ionomycin. The number of independent experiments with about 50 analyzed cells each are indicated. P-values < 0.01 were defined as significant by unpaired t-test and are indicated with 2 asterisks; N.S. not significant.
The proposed interaction between the Sec61 α-subunit and Exotoxin A was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. After incubation of 14C-labeled Exotoxin A (20 µg/ml) with HeLa cell lysate, an antibody directed against the Sec61 β-subunit precipitated the Sec61-complex and radioactive Exotoxin A from the lysate (Fig. 3A).5
Figure 3. Exotoxin A directly interacts with the N-terminus of the Sec61 α-subunit. (A) Antibody against Sec61β subunit co-precipitated Sec61 complex and radioactively labeled Exotoxin A added to the cell lysate, GAPDH antibody was used as negative control. Upper panel: autoradiogram; lower panel: detection of Sec61 α-subunit with antibody against the C-terminus of the Sec61 α-subunit. (B) The first 60 cytosolic N-terminal amino acids of the mammalian Sec61 α-subunit were synthesized as 12mers on cellulose membranes.14C-labeled Exotoxin A was added overnight and binding was mapped on two membranes by radiography. The corresponding peptide sequences are depicted above the spots (IQ motif in red) and the known interaction regions with Sec62 and CaM are indicated by blue brackets. (C) 14C-Exotoxin A and GST-CaM or Exotoxin A and 14C-GST-CaM were mixed prior to addition to the membrane spotted with peptide corresponding to the Sec61α IQ motif (n = 6). The normalized radioactivity is shown.
Since we had observed a direct interaction between Exotoxin A and the Sec61 complex in the coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we wondered if we could map the interaction sites in the Sec61 α-subunit by screening a peptide library with 14C-labeled Exotoxin A. This assay identified the N-terminal region as a potential interaction site (data not shown). To test whether there is indeed an Exotoxin A interaction at the N-terminus of the Sec61 α-subunit, we synthesized the mammalian Sec61 α-subunit N-terminal domain as peptide spots (12 amino acid residues; shifted by 2) on a cellulose membrane and performed Exotoxin A binding assays. As shown in Figure 3B, 14C-labeled Exotoxin A was bound to the N-terminal domain at amino acid residues 19–30; this represents the same region at which the Ca2+-CaM interaction site was identified and it is near the region where the Sec62 interaction with Sec61 α-subunit occurs in the absence of calcium.4
To further validate the binding properties of Exotoxin A around the IQ motif, we performed competition experiments with radioactively labeled and nonlabeled Ca2+-CaM as well as Exotoxin A. Ca2+-CaM bound much more efficiently to the IQ motif and effectively competed for Exotoxin A binding (Fig. 3C). In contrast, Exotoxin A bound less efficiently and was unable to compete with the binding of Ca2+-CaM. Thus, the affinity of Exotoxin A for the IQ motif in the N-terminal region of the Sec61 α-subunit appeared to be lower than that of Ca2+-CaM. This result was further substantiated by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments, in which biotinylated peptides representing the N-terminal IQ peptide of Sec61 α-subunit or a region of the ER luminal part of loop 7 (negative control) were bound to a streptavidin-coated sensor chip and binding affinities were recorded. Ca2+-CaM bound with a high affinity, i.e., KD of 136 nM, to the IQ peptide and was released quickly after the Ca2+ was removed (Fig. 4A). This KD was consistent with the KD that had previously been determined by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (121 nM).1 By comparison, the Exotoxin A association was low and, in contrast to Ca2+-CaM, the toxin could not be released from the chip surface by a low ionic strength in the buffer (Fig. 4B). Exotoxin A was released from the immobilized peptide only with higher salt and detergent concentrations.
Figure 4. In contrast to Exotoxin A, Ca2+-CaM binds to the IQ motif of the Sec61 α-subunit with high affinity. (A) Calmodulin association and dissociation was measured by surface plasmon resonance at different concentrations in the presence of Ca2+. The dissociation constant was calculated as 136 nM. (B) Association and dissociation kinetics of Exotoxin A and Ca2+-CaM were compared under similar conditions.
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that Exotoxin A interacts with the Sec61 α-subunit and suppresses Ca2+ leakage from the ER in human cells; this confirms the previous conclusion that the Sec61 complex is a major ER Ca2+ leak channel.1,3,9 Furthermore, we identified the IQ motif in the N-terminus of Sec61 α-subunit as an Exotoxin A binding site, which most likely explains the inhibitory effect of Exotoxin A on Ca2+ leakage from the ER. This motif was previously shown to provide the binding site for Ca2+-CaM.1 We suggest that in both cases ligand binding to the IQ motif in the Sec61 α-subunit shifts the equilibrium between open and closed states of the Sec61 channel to the closed conformation. This is also consistent with the inhibitory effect of Exotoxin A on ER export of immunogenic peptides to the cytosol.5 We note that the IQ motif is close to the Sec62 binding site, which also contributes to Sec61 channel gating (Fig. 1).4
Compared with the effects of BiP and Ca2+-CaM, the physiological suppressors of Ca2+ leakage from the ER, the effect of Exotoxin A was not dramatic. We attribute this to the following facts: (1) the toxin has a lower affinity for the Sec61 complex as compared with Ca2+-CaM; (2) Ca2+-CaM has a much higher cytosolic concentration (6 µM) compared with the toxin (30 nM);11 and (3) due to its size the toxin can only be expected to act on ribosome-free Sec61 complexes (Fig. 5).1,12
Figure 5. Exotoxin A compared with the ribosome-Sec61-complex with Ca2+-CaM bound at the N-terminal IQ motif. The cryo-EM structure of the mammalian Sec61 complex (Sec61α, red; Sec61β, pink; Sec61γ, magenta) with the ribosome (blue) in complex with Ca2+-CaM (green) was taken from reference 1. The IQ motif is shown in yellow, Exotoxin A in turquoise. The mass of Exotoxin A precludes its interaction with the N terminus of the Sec61 α-subunit in the presence of the ribosome.1,12
In principle, the inhibitory activity of Exotoxin A could contribute to its toxicity in HeLa cells.13 However, the low affinity of Exotoxin A for the IQ motif and its competition with Ca2+-CaM argue against a contribution of this activity toward Exotoxin A action in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Live-cell calcium imaging
Live-cell calcium imaging for cytosolic Ca2+ was performed with Fura-2, as previously described.9,10 The cytosolic Ca2+ concentration was deduced from ratio measurements by an established calibration method.9 Data were analyzed with Excel 2007. During the experiment, cells were treated with Exotoxin A (30 nM; Calbiochem) or the respective buffer, respectively, and after 10 min with either thapsigargin (1µM) to unmask the ER calcium leakage or ionomycin (5 µM) to release the total Ca2+ from the intracellular pools. Data were collected on the iMIC microscope and the polychromator V (Till Photonics) by alternating excitation at 340 and 380 nm and measurement of the emitted fluorescence at 510 nm. Images containing 50–55 cells/frame were sampled every 3 s.
Coimmunoprecipitation
Coimmunoprecipitation was performed with lysate of HeLa cells grown in 60 nm dishes at 37°C and 5% CO2 to a confluence of 80–90%. Cells were washed twice with PBS (Gibco) and lysed in 1 ml of ice-cold CellLytic-M lysis buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Supernatant was collected following centrifugation at 16,000 x g and 4°C for 10 min and precleared for 1 h with protein G- and A-sepharose (Amersham Biosciences). After removing the beads the precleared lysate was incubated with 14C-Exotoxin A (20 µg/ml) for a further 5 h at 4°C. For input, 100 µl of the sample was collected. To precipitate the Sec61 complex, affinity purified antibody against Sec61β (rabbit; 1 µg/ml) or GAPDH (Santa Cruz, rabbit; 1 µg/ml) as a negative control was added to equal amounts of the 14C-Exotoxin A-treated lysate and incubated overnight at 4°C. Precipitation of antibodies was performed by addition of 100 µl of protein G- and A-sepharose for 8 h at 4°C. The beads were washed three times with 1 ml of NP-40 buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 1% Nonidet-P40). Precipitated protein as well as input were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting. For detection, a Sec61 α-subunit specific rabbit polyclonal antibody was used as well as a secondary peroxidase (POD)-coupled anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma) and ECLTM, visualized with a Lumi-ImagerF1 (Roche). Detection of 14C-Exotoxin A was performed by phosphorimaging and after visualization with the Typhoon-Trio imaging system (GE Healthcare).
Peptide spot-binding assays
IQ-peptide constructs (length 12 amino acid residues) or the first 60 cytosolic N-terminal amino acids (spots: length 12 amino acid residues, shifted by two) of the mammalian Sec61 α-subunit were synthesized on acid-hardened cellulose membranes, derivatized with a polyethylene glycol spacer, as described previously.1,2,15 Membranes were equilibrated for 2 h at 4°C in binding buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM CaCl2). 14C-labeled proteins (GST, GST-CaM, and Exotoxin A) were added and incubated at 4°C overnight. For competition experiments, 14C-Exotoxin A (62.5 nM) was preincubated with GST-CaM (625 nM) or 14C-GST-CaM (62.5 nM) with Exotoxin A (625 nM) prior to its addition to the membrane. The membrane was washed 3 times for 10 min with binding buffer, dried at room temperature, and subjected to phosphorimaging with a Typhoon imaging device (GE Healthcare).
SPR measurements
IQ peptide and a control peptide 325–339 were synthesized with biotinylated dipeptide KG at the C-terminus and the first peptide immobilized in the measuring cell of the Biacore avidin sensor chip SA.3 GST-CaM and Exotoxin A binding to IQ peptide were analyzed at analyte concentrations of 0.0625 to 1 µM (GST-CaM) and 5 µM (Exotoxin A) in comparison to peptide 325–339 in the reference cell. The running buffer was 10 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 6.4 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, and 0.005% Surfactant P2. Measurements were performed on a Biacore X instrument.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Mazen Ahmad and Volkhard Helms (Saarbrücken) and Reinhard Kappl (Homburg) for help in assembling Figure 5. They were supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 967 and SFB 894).
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- CaM
calmodulin
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- KD
dissociation constant
- SPR
surface plasmon resonance
References
- 1.Erdmann F, Schäuble N, Lang S, Jung M, Honigmann A, Ahmad M, Dudek J, Benedix J, Harsman A, Kopp A, et al. Interaction of calmodulin with Sec61α limits Ca2+ leakage from the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 2011;30:17–31. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harsman A, Kopp A, Wagner R, Zimmermann R, Jung M. Calmodulin regulation of the calcium-leak channel Sec61 is unique to vertebrates. Channels (Austin) 2011;5:293–8. doi: 10.4161/chan.5.4.16160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schäuble N, Lang S, Cappel S, Jung M, Schorr S, Ulucan Ö, Linxweiler J, Dudek J, Blum R, Helms V, et al. BiP-mediated closing of the Sec61 channel via loop 7 interaction limits Ca2+ leakage from the ER. EMBO J. 2012;31:3282–96. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Linxweiler M, Schorr S, Schäuble N, Jung M, Linxweiler J, Langer F, Schäfers H-J, Cavalié A, Zimmermann R, Greiner M. Targeting cell migration and endoplasmatic reticulum stress response with calmodulin antagonists: Mimicking Sec62-depletion phenotypes by small molecule treatment. BMC-cancer . 2013 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koopmann JO, Albring J, Hüter E, Bulbuc N, Spee P, Neefjes J, Hämmerling GJ, Momburg F. Export of antigenic peptides from the endoplasmic reticulum intersects with retrograde protein translocation through the Sec61p channel. Immunity. 2000;13:117–27. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sandvig K, van Deurs B. Membrane traffic exploited by protein toxins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002;18:1–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.011502.142107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith DC, Spooner RA, Watson PD, Murray JL, Hodge TW, Amessou M, Johannes L, Lord JM, Roberts LM. Internalized Pseudomonas exotoxin A can exploit multiple pathways to reach the endoplasmic reticulum. Traffic. 2006;7:379–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wirth A, Jung M, Bies C, Frien M, Tyedmers J, Zimmermann R, Wagner R. The Sec61p complex is a dynamic precursor activated channel. Mol Cell. 2003;12:261–8. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lang S, Erdmann F, Jung M, Wagner R, Cavalié A, Zimmermann R. Sec61 complexes form ubiquitous ER Ca2+ leak channels. Channels (Austin) 2011;5:228–35. doi: 10.4161/chan.5.3.15314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lang S, Schäuble N, Cavalié A, Zimmermann R. Live cell calcium imaging in combination with siRNA mediated gene silencing identifies Ca2+ leak channels in the ER membrane and their regulatory mechanisms. J. Visualized Experiments 2011; DOI: 10.3791/2730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Means S, Smith AJ, Shepherd J, Shadid J, Fowler J, Wojcikiewicz RJH, Mazel T, Smith GD, Wilson BS. Reaction diffusion modeling of calcium dynamics with realistic ER geometry. Biophys J. 2006;91:537–57. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.075036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wedekind JE, Trame CB, Dorywalska M, Koehl P, Raschke TM, McKee M, FitzGerald D, Collier RJ, McKay DB. Refined crystallographic structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A and its implications for the molecular mechanism of toxicity. J Mol Biol. 2001;314:823–37. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lory S, Strom MS, Johnson K. Expression and secretion of the cloned Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:714–9. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.2.714-719.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hilpert K, Winkler DF, Hancock RE. Peptide arrays on cellulose support: SPOT synthesis, a time and cost efficient method for synthesis of large numbers of peptides in a parallel and addressable fashion. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1333–49. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Müller L, de Escauriaza MD, Lajoie P, Theis M, Jung M, Müller A, Burgard C, Greiner M, Snapp EL, Dudek J, et al. Evolutionary gain of function for the ER membrane protein Sec62 from yeast to humans. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:691–703. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-08-0730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tyedmers J, Lerner M, Bies C, Dudek J, Skowronek MH, Haas IG, Heim N, Nastainczyk W, Volkmer J, Zimmermann R. Homologs of the yeast Sec complex subunits Sec62p and Sec63p are abundant proteins in dog pancreas microsomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7214–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Awad W, Estrada I, Shen Y, Hendershot LM. BiP mutants that are unable to interact with endoplasmic reticulum DnaJ proteins provide insights into interdomain interactions in BiP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1164–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702132105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lang S, Benedix J, Fedeles SV, Schorr S, Schirra C, Schäuble N, Jalal C, Greiner M, Hassdenteufel S, Tatzelt J, et al. Different effects of Sec61α, Sec62 and Sec63 depletion on transport of polypeptides into the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1958–69. doi: 10.1242/jcs.096727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





