Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2014 May 7;192(12):5821–5829. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400404

Regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment undergo Fas-dependent cell death during IL-2/αCD40 therapy

Jonathan M Weiss *, Jeff J Subleski *, Tim Back *, Xin Chen , Stephanie K Watkins , Hideo Yagita §, Thomas J Sayers *, William J Murphy , Robert H Wiltrout *
PMCID: PMC4048774  NIHMSID: NIHMS587922  PMID: 24808361

Abstract

Fas ligand expression in certain tumors has been proposed to contribute to immunosuppression and poor prognosis. However, immunotherapeutic approaches may elicit the Fas-mediated elimination of immunoregulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) within tumors which represent major obstacles for cancer immunotherapy. Previously, we showed that Interleukin (IL)-2 and agonistic CD40 antibody (αCD40) elicited synergistic anti-tumor responses coincident with the efficient removal of Tregs and MDSC. We now demonstrate in two murine tumor models that Treg and MDSC loss within the tumor microenvironment after IL-2/αCD40 occurs through a Fas-dependent cell death pathway. Among tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils and immature myeloid cells expressed Fas ligand following treatment. Fas was expressed by tumor-associated Tregs and immature myeloid cells, including MDSC. Tregs and MDSC in the tumor microenvironment expressed active caspases after IL-2/αCD40 therapy and, in contrast to effector T cells, Tregs significantly down-regulated Bcl-2 expression. In contrast, Tregs and MDSC proliferated and expanded in the spleen following treatment. Adoptive transfer of Fas-deficient Tregs or MDSC into wildtype, Treg or MDSC-depleted hosts, resulted in the persistence of Tregs or MDSC and the loss of anti-tumor efficacy in response to IL-2/αCD40. These results demonstrate the importance of Fas-mediated Treg/MDSC removal for successful anti-tumor immunotherapy. Our results suggest that immunotherapeutic strategies that include exploiting Treg and MDSC susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis hold promise for treatment of cancer.

Introduction

The accumulation of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Treg) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) within the tumor microenvironment represents a major obstacle for the development of effective anti-tumor immunotherapies. Treg removal using either cyclophosphamide (1) or CD25 antibodies (2), or MDSC removal by Sunitinib (3), restored tumor-specific T cell responses and represent clinically feasible approaches for inducing therapeutic responses. As we gain better understanding of the mediators responsible for the development, recruitment and expansion of Tregs or MDSC within tumors, more effective strategies aimed at controlling them can be exploited.

Activated lymphocytes frequently express elevated levels of death receptors rendering them susceptible to apoptosis (4, 5). Interactions between the Fas death receptor and its ligand activate cysteine-aspartic proteases (caspases) and induce lymphocyte apoptosis (5-8). The elimination of clonally expanded, activated immune cells balances immune responses by controlling the ratio between effector T cells and Treg (9, 10). In contrast to effector T cells, Treg frequently display activation markers (e.g. CD25), have faster basal turnover rates and possess suppressor function independent of their proliferation status (11). In contrast to conventional T cells, freshly isolated Tregs express high levels of Fas and are prone to Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis (12, 13). Anti-tumor strategies that target Tregs, including the intra-tumoral administration of FasL (14), are in development. However, some naïve Tregs remain resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis (11, 13) and Treg sensitivity to Fas-induced cell death is regulated by T cell receptor ligation and Treg stimulation (12, 13). Under certain inflammatory conditions, MDSC also express Fas and have similarly been shown to undergo apoptosis in response to T cell-derived Fas ligand (15, 16). As such, there is considerable potential for exploiting the sensitivities of these cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis as part of an overall strategy to treat cancer.

The Fas pathway is a critical mechanism by which activated leukocytes lyse tumor cells (17). However, Fas ligand expression by tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (18, 19) can contribute to tumor escape through a process referred to as “tumor counter-attack”, whereby Fas-positive immune cells are killed [reviewed in (20)]. We hypothesized that immunotherapy would alter leukocyte sensitivity to counterattack within the tumor microenvironment and therefore tip the balance toward tumor killing. We showed previously that treatment of mice bearing metastatic RCC with the combination of IL-2 and agonistic CD40 antibody elicits synergistic anti-tumor responses in association with removal of Tregs and MDSC from primary tumors. Herein, we show for the first time that the loss of these suppressor cell populations in two different tumor models occurs via Fas-mediated apoptosis. Our data highlight the ability of combination immunotherapies, such as IL-2/αCD40 to therapeutically exploit the preferential susceptibility in the tumor microenvironment of Tregs and MDSC to active cell death.

Materials and Methods

Mice

BALB/cJ WT and IFNγ−/− mice were obtained from the Animal Production Area of NCI Frederick. Balb/c CD45.1 congenic mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). C57BL6 MRL-Fas(lpr) and mice expressing eGFP under control of the β-actin promoter were from Jackson Laboratory and backcrossed onto a Balb/c background at least 10 generations. All mice were genotyped prior to use.

Cells and Reagents

Renal adenocarcinoma of BALB/c origin (Renca) was passaged intra-peritoneally (i.p.) as described (21). The 4T1 cell line was obtained from ATCC. Recombinant human interleukin-2 (Teceleukin) was obtained from the Biological Resources Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute. Agonist rat anti-mouse CD40 (clone FGK115B3) was purified from ascites as described (22, 23). Fas ligand blocking antibody (clone MFL4) was generated as described (24). The isotype-matched control antibody was Syrian hamster gamma globulin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). CD8+ cells were depleted in vivo by i.p. injection of rat anti-mouse CD8 (clone Ly2.2) on days −1, 4, 11 and 18. NK cells were depleted in vivo by i.p. injection of rabbit anti-asialo-GM1 (10 μl in 90 μl PBS/dose; Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA) on days −1, 4 and 11.

Immunohistochemistry

Murine primary tumors (formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded) were harvested on day 21 and sectioned at 5 μm. Kidney tissue microarrays consisting of TNM-staged human renal cell carcinoma and adjacent normal tissue were purchased from US Biomax, Inc. (Rockville, MD). Each slide consisted of duplicated cores and matched normal adjacent tissue collected at time of patient surgery. Patients had not received any therapy prior to surgery. Slides were blocked using 10% goat serum followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with anti-Fas and anti-Fas ligand antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Slides were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature using biotinylated goat polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG and ABComplex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).

In vivo tumor models and treatments

1×105 Renca or 4T1 tumor cells were injected under the kidney capsule or mammary fat pad, respectively. Mice treated with IL-2 received 300,000 IU i.p. twice a day on days 11, 15, 18 and 21 post-tumor injection. Mice treated with anti-CD40 received 65 μg i.p. once on days 11-15 and 18-21 post-tumor injection. In some experiments, mice were treated with 0.5 mg Fas blocking antibody or isotype control on days 11, 13, 15, 18 and 21.

Adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells and MDSC

Mice transgenic for eGFP under the control of the β-actin promoter were used as recipient mice for adoptively transferred Tregs. The mice were depleted of endogenous Tregs (>90% peripheral depletion) by 3 sequential injections of PC61 ascites (1:5 dilutions given over 4 days). Mice received adoptively transferred Tregs 2 days following the final injection of PC61. For each adoptive transfer experiment, the splenocytes from 30 WT or MRL-Fas(lpr) mice were pooled. Red blood cells were lysed in ACK buffer (Lonza, Walkersville, MD). Splenocytes were incubated with CD4 T cell biotin antibody cocktail and anti-biotin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) to enrich for CD4+ T cells. T cells were incubated with fluorescently conjugated antibodies for CD4 and CD25 and the CD4+CD25+ population representing Tregs was purified on a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to >95 % purity. Sorted cells were washed with cold saline and injected (5×10^5 cells) into the tail-veins of recipient mice. The next day, mice were inoculated orthotopically with Renca tumor cells.

For the adoptive transfer of MDSC, the procedure above was followed except CD45.1 congenic mice were used as recipient mice for adoptively transferred MDSC and the mice were depleted of endogenous MDSC (>90% peripheral depletion) by 3 sequential injections of RB68C5 ascites (1:5 dilutions given over 4 days). To enrich for MDSC, donor mice were inoculated with 1×105 4T1 tumor cells sub-cutaneously which grew untreated for 12 days. Splenocytes from 3 WT or MRL-Fas mice were pooled and the CD11b+Gr1LoNKp46 population representing MDSC was purified to >95% purity. Sorted cells were washed and injected (1×10^6) into recipient mice. The next day, mice were inoculated sub-cutaneously with 4T1 tumor cells.

Isolation of splenic and tumor-associated leukocytes

Leukocytes were isolated from the tumors and spleens of mice as described (23).

Assay of Treg Suppressor Function

Single cell suspensions of splenocytes were prepared as described previously (23). CD4 cells were purified using magnetic beads and positive selection (Miltenyi Biotec). Washed CD4+ cells were incubated with fluorescently conjugated CD4 and CD25 antibodies and sorted into CD4+CD25 T effectors (Teff) and CD4+CD25+ Treg populations. CD4-depleted splenocytes from WT mice were CFSE-labeled and used as stimulator APC. Teffs (50,000 cells/well) were stimulated with 200,000 APCs and 1 μg/ml functional grade anti-CD3 ab for 72 hr. Tregs were added at various Teff:Treg ratios. Cell proliferation was assessed after gating on live cells (Invitrogen).

Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated from spleen and tumor tissue as described (23). Samples were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method (25). Gene expression was normalized to the level of GAPDH housekeeping gene.

Flow Cytometry

Cells (1 × 106) were incubated in cell staining buffer (0.1% BSA, 0.1% sodium azide) containing 250 μg/ml 2.4G2 ascites for 15 min. Cells were stained with diluted fluorescently-conjugated antibodies (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) for 20 min followed by 2 washes in staining buffer. For intracellular staining of BrDU, Bcl-2 and FoxP3, cells were fixed and permeabilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA for BrDU and Bcl-2; eBioscience, San Diego, CA for FoxP3). Labeled cells were analyzed on an LSR-II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Tregs were identified as CD4+CD25+ cells; CD4 “non Treg” cells were CD4+CD25 and CD8 T cells were CD4CD8+. MDSC were identified as CD11b+Gr1LoCD124+ cells.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Significance was indicated by p<0.05 values.

Results

Fas ligand is associated with tumor stage in human RCC

Although tumor-derived Fas expression associates with poorer outcome in RCC patients (19), the contributions of tumor-versus leukocyte-associated Fas ligand expression remains incompletely defined, particularly in the context of immunotherapy. By immunohistochemistry, we found that increased Fas ligand expression was associated with advanced stage RCC (Figure 1). Fas ligand was minimally expressed by normal adjacent tissues, as well as stages I or II RCC; but was uniformly upregulated among stage III RCC from patients (Figure 1A). By quantitating the sum of Fas ligand staining intensities, we found significant upregulation of Fas ligand immunoreactivity for stage III RCC, as compared to all other samples evaluated (Figure 1B). Fas ligand positive tumor-associated lymphocytes in RCC have been described (17) and while we do not rule out leukocyte contributions, the staining pattern for Fas ligand was homogeneous throughout tumor sections and most evidently associated with tumor cells.

Figure 1. Fas ligand is associated with tumor stage in human RCC.

Figure 1

Human clear cell RCC and adjacent normal tissue were analyzed for Fas and Fas ligand expression by immunohistochemistry. (A) Reactivity is denoted by brown DAB staining (200x magnification; black bar denotes 100 μM). Results are representative of duplicate core sample from 9 normal adjacent controls, 74 stage I RCC, 20 stage II RCC and 7 stage III RCC samples. (B) Immunostaining was quantitated using Cell Profiler and represented as the sum of pixel intensities (** p<0.005; *** p<0.0005; **** p<0.0001 for the indicated comparisons).

Next, we analyzed Fas and Fas ligand expression in murine Renca tumors from VC- and IL-2/αCD40-treated mice. Fas expression was expressed weakly in tumors from VC treated mice and upregulated within tumors from IL-2/αCD40-treated mice (Supplemental Figure 1). Fas ligand expression was essentially undetectable in tumors from VC-treated mice yet robustly expressed by both tumor and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes from IL-2/αCD40 treated mice (Supplemental Figure 1). These findings indicate that IL-2/αCD40 treatment resulted in the accumulation of Fas-ligand positive leukocytes within tumors.

Loss of regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment following IL-2/αCD40 therapy is dependent on Fas

Although Fas ligand expression was positively associated with increasing RCC tumor stage, we hypothesized that immunotherapy may target immunoregulatory cells for apoptosis. Previously, we showed synergistic anti-tumor responses achieved by IL-2/αCD40 therapy were accompanied by the removal of Tregs and MDSC within the tumor microenvironment (23). Although host Fas signaling is necessary for the anti-tumor efficacy of this immunotherapy (22), its precise contributions remain unclear. We therefore evaluated IL-2/αCD40 therapy in MRL-Fas(lpr) mice which are deficient in functional Fas. Since these mice have well-characterized immune dysregulation, we also used a Fas ligand neutralizing antibody. IL-2/αCD40 induced the expansion of Tregs and MDSC in the spleen, and anti-Fas ligand had no effect on this increase (Figures 2A and 2B). A similar expansion of splenic Tregs and MDSC was observed using MRL-Fas(lpr) mice. In contrast, IL-2/αCD40 failed to reduce tumor-associated Tregs when Fas ligand was blocked or in MRL-Fas(lpr) mice (Figure 2C). Similarly, the loss of tumor-associated MDSC in IL-2/αCD40 treated mice was abrogated when Fas/Fas ligand was blocked (Figure 2D). The frequency of Tregs and MDSC among all CD45+ leukocytes was similarly reduced (Figures 2E and 2F), indicating that reduced Treg and MDSC numbers were not due to smaller tumor size after IL-2/αCD40 treatment. Thus, Fas is required for loss of Tregs and MDSC within tumors following IL-2/αCD40. The depletion of CD8+ cells, but not NK cells, during immunotherapy also abrogated the loss of tumor-associated Tregs and MDSC (data not shown).

Figure 2. IL-2/αCD40 induces the Fas-dependent loss of Tregs and MDSC in the tumor microenvironment.

Figure 2

Renca tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40. Black bars denote mice that were treated with either blocking antibody against Fas ligand or isotype-matched control antibody. White bars indicate VC or IL-2/αCD40 treated MRL-Fas(lpr) mice. On day 22, mice were euthanized and the spleens and primary tumors were harvested. The total number of (A) Tregs and (B) MDSC in the spleen was determined by multiplying the number of CD45+ leukocytes by the percentage in each sample. The number of tumor-associated (C) Treg and (D) MDSC were quantitated by multiplying the number of CD45+ leukocytes by the percentage in each sample. The percentage of tumor-associated (E) Tregs and (F) MDSC among CD45+ tumor leukocytes is shown. (* p< 0.02; ** p<0.005 compared to VC). Data are derived from 5 mice per treatment group in 2 separate experiments.

To corroborate these findings in another tumor model, we analyzed Treg and MDSC frequencies in the spleens and tumors of mice bearing 4T1 breast cancer cells. IL-2/αCD40 caused a significant reduction in Treg and MDSC frequency in primary tumors (Supplemental Figure 2, panels C-F). In this model, αCD40 as a single agent was also capable of reducing tumor-associated Tregs (panels C and E), but not MDSC. In 4T1-bearing mice, IL-2 and αCD40 expanded splenic Tregs (panel A) but had no effect on MDSC (panel B).

Fas and Fas ligand are expressed by tumor-associated leukocytes following IL-2/αCD40 treatment

By qPCR, we found that IL-2/αCD40 significantly increased Fas ligand mRNA expression from tumor-associated leukocytes, as compared to control-treated mice (Figure 3A). Fas ligand mRNA expression was also significantly increased in splenocytes in response to IL-2/αCD40 treatment.

Figure 3. IL-2/αCD40 induces Fas and Fas ligand positive leukocytes within tumors and spleens.

Figure 3

Tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40. On day 15, tumors and spleens were either homogenized directly in Trizol or leukocytes were isolated by Percoll gradient prior to lysis. Total mRNA was reverse-transcribed and analyzed by qPCR for (A) Fas ligand and (C) Fas gene expression. Results from VC-treated samples were normalized to 1 (* p<0.04; ** p<p<0.002; *** p<0.0002). Results are derived from at least 9 samples per group. Percoll-purified leukocytes isolated from primary tumors were gated by CD45 and analyzed for Fas ligand (B) and Fas (D) protein expression by flow cytometry. Histograms denote the fluorescence intensity among cell populations for Fas ligand (B) and Fas (D) expression. Open curves represent VC-treated groups and shaded curves represent IL-2/αCD40-treated groups. Flow results are representative of 5 mice per treatment group in 2 separate experiments.

We showed previously that IL-2/αCD40 induces significant accumulation of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and myeloid cells in primary tumors (23). We therefore sought to identify the cellular source of Fas ligand and Fas within tumors following IL-2/αCD40 treatment. Fas ligand was expressed by a subpopulation of CD8+ T cells, as well as by a considerable number of CD11b+ myeloid cells (Figure 3B). When we further analyzed the CD11b+ cells, we found that Fas ligand was expressed by Gr1hi granulocytic and by Gr1lo monocytic MDSC. The induction of Fas ligand expression was dependent upon IFNγ, since no upregulation was detected in IL-2/αCD40-treated IFNγ−/− mice (data not shown).

Fas expression in tumors and spleens was similarly examined by qPCR. As shown in Figure 3C, significant increases in Fas mRNA were observed in leukocytes isolated from the tumor, as well as whole tumor tissue following IL-2/αCD40 treatment. In contrast, splenocytes had reduced Fas expression after IL-2/αCD40 treatment.

Next, we analyzed Fas protein expression on tumor-associated leukocytes. Fas expression was observed on Tregs, as well as CD11b+Gr1Lo cells which include MDSC (Figure 2D). Fas was undetectable among CD11b+Gr1hi granulocytes (Figure 3D) and CD8+ T cells (Supplemental Figure 3). The induction of Fas receptor expression was also dependent upon IFNγ, since no upregulation was detected in IL-2/αCD40 treated IFNγ−/− mice (data not shown). IFNγ mRNA expression was significantly higher among tumor-associated leukocytes from IL-2/αCD40 treated mice, as compared to control-treated mice (Figure 4). In contrast, no significant increase in IFNγ mRNA expression was observed for splenocytes from IL-2/αCD40 treated mice. Thus, the selective upregulation of IFNγ expression in the tumor microenvironment following immunotherapy directly correlates with the tumor microenvironment-specific upregulation of Fas and Fas ligand expression.

Figure 4. IL-2/αCD40 induces IFNγ expression in the tumor microenvironment but not in the spleen.

Figure 4

Tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40. On day 15, (A) tumor leukocytes and (B) splenocytes were isolated as described previously and lysed in Trizol reagent. The total mRNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA and analyzed by qPCR for IFNγ gene expression. The results from VC-treated samples were normalized to 1 (* p<0.03; ns = not significant). Data are derived from 4 mice per treatment group in 2 separate experiments.

Tregs and MDSC preferentially undergo apoptosis within the tumor microenvironment following IL-2/αCD40 therapy

To determine whether the reduced numbers of Tregs and MDSC were associated with active cell death, we analyzed active caspase levels in leukocytes isolated from tumors and spleens of VC and IL-2/αCD40-treated mice. Among Renca tumor-associated leukocytes, Tregs and MDSC significantly upregulated active caspase levels following IL-2/αCD40 treatment (Figure 5A). No upregulation in activated caspases was observed in IL-2/αCD40-treated IFNγ−/− mice or in mice depleted of CD8+ cells (data not shown). In contrast, CD4+CD25 non-Tregs (effector) modestly, yet significantly, down-regulated active caspases, while no change was observed for CD8+ T cells, indicating the preferential activation of this pathway in tumor-associated Tregs and MDSC following therapy. Similar increases in Treg and MDSC-associated caspase activation were observed in the 4T1 tumor model (Figure 5B).

Figure 5. IL-2/αCD40 activates caspases on Tregs and MDSC in the tumor and spleen.

Figure 5

Renca or 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40. On day 15, the primary tumors and spleens were harvested. Activated caspases were analyzed on day 15 using the cell-permeable CaspGLOW active staining kit and flow cytometry. The panels in A and C depict results from tumor-associated leukocytes and splenocytes from Renca-tumor bearing mice, respectively. The panels in B and D depict results from tumor-associated leukocytes and splenocytes from 4T1-tumor bearing mice, respectively. Statistics were computed in comparison to the corresponding VC (*p<0.05; ns = not significant). Data are derived from 5 mice per treatment group in 2 separate experiments.

In the spleens of Renca-bearing mice, upregulated expression of active caspase was detected for all leukocyte populations analyzed, although this increase did not reach significance for CD8+ T cells (Figure 5C). In the spleens of 4T1-tumor bearing mice, Tregs had no increased caspase activation whereas MDSC did upregulate active caspases (Figure 5D). Thus, there was no selectivity for caspase activation among splenocytes in mice receiving immunotherapy.

Treg loss was accompanied by reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2

Bcl-2 down-regulation occurs at the early stages of apoptosis and has been shown to be a marker of Treg apoptosis in vivo (26). By flow cytometry, we observed a significant decrease in Bcl-2 expression among Renca tumor-associated Tregs following IL-2/αCD40 therapy (Figure 6A) which was not observed for CD4+CD25 non-Tregs or CD8+ T cells. A similar decrease in Treg-associated Bcl-2 levels was observed among 4T1 tumor-associated Tregs (Figure 6B). In the spleens of IL-2/αCD40-treated mice, all three lymphocyte populations had significantly reduced Bcl-2 expression, as compared to VC-treated mice (Figure 6C). Thus, there did not appear to be selectivity for Bcl-2 down-modulation among splenocytes in mice receiving immunotherapy. Interestingly, splenic Tregs in the 4T1 model exhibited significantly elevated Bcl-2 levels after IL-2/αCD40 treatment (Figure 6D).

Figure 6. Tregs down-regulate Bcl-2 expression in the tumor and spleen following IL-2/αCD40 treatment.

Figure 6

Renca or 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40. On day 15, the primary tumors and spleens were harvested. Bcl-2 expression was determined on day 15 by intracellular flow cytometric cell staining. The panels in A and C depict results from tumor-associated leukocytes and splenocytes from Renca-tumor bearing mice, respectively. The panels in B and D depict results from tumor-associated leukocytes and splenocytes from 4T1-tumor bearing mice, respectively. Statistics were computed in comparison to the corresponding VC (*p<0.02; **p<0.008). Data are derived from 5 mice per treatment group in 2 separate experiments.

Tregs and MDSC expand in the spleens of IL-2/αCD40 treated mice via proliferation

Our data indicated that Tregs and MDSC expanded in the spleens of IL-2/αCD40 treated mice, despite reduced Bcl-2 expression and elevated Fas ligand and active caspase expression following therapy. To reconcile these findings, we hypothesized that Tregs and MDSC apoptosis in the spleen might be due to overcompensation via proliferation (27). Consistently, we found that IL-2/αCD40 caused Treg proliferation in the spleen, as evidenced by BrdU uptake (Figures 7A and 7C). We also show, for the first time, that MDSC proliferate significantly in the spleens following IL-2/αCD40 treatment (Figures 7B and 7D). In contrast, IL-2/αCD40 did not induce significant proliferation of tumor-associated Tregs or MDSC (Figures 7E and 7F).

Figure 7. Tregs and MDSC proliferate in the spleens, but not tumors, of IL-2/αCD40 treated mice.

Figure 7

Tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40. On day 15, the spleens were harvested and the percentage of BrdU positive (A) Tregs and (B) MDSC were quantified (* p<0.01; n=3). The flow histograms depict the shift in BrdU mean fluorescence intensity in one sample representative of 3 total samples for (C) splenic Tregs, (D) splenic MDSC, (E) tumor-associated Tregs and (F) tumor-associated MDSC. The open dashed curve represents VC treated groups and the shaded curves represent IL-2/αCD40-treated groups. Data are derived from 5 mice per treatment group in 2 separate experiments.

The Fas-mediated loss of Tregs in the Renca tumor microenvironment underlies the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 therapy

To demonstrate that the Fas-mediated loss of Tregs is central to the success of IL-2/αCD40 therapy of Renca, we adoptively transferred Tregs from MRL-Fas(lpr) mice into Treg-depleted wildtype hosts. If the principal contribution of Fas expression to IL-2/αCD40 anti-tumor responses is the loss of Tregs, then the anti-tumor effects of this regimen should be abrogated in mice receiving MRL-Fas(lpr) Tregs.

As early as day 5, adoptively transferred Tregs persisted in recipient hosts and represented the majority of CD4+ and CD4+CD25+ cells in the peripheral blood (Figure 8A). We used mice transgenic for eGFP under the β-actin promoter, so as to distinguish between recipient (eGFP+) and transferred (eGFP) cells. By day 21, the adoptively transferred (eGFP) cells expanded in the spleens, such that >99% of the CD4+ T cells were eGFP negative (Figure 8A). At day 21, both host and transferred Tregs were detectable in primary tumors of mice that received IL-2/αCD40 (Figure 8A). Whereas the majority of tumor-associated Tregs in mice receiving WT Tregs were GFP+ endogenous cells, the situation was reversed in mice receiving Tregs from MRL-Fas(lpr) mice. The inability of MRL-Fas(lpr) Tregs to undergo Fas-mediated apoptosis following IL-2/αCD40 resulted in their accumulation such that the majority of Tregs in these mice were GFP transferred MRL-Fas(lpr) Tregs (Fig 8A). Tregs from MRL-Fas(lpr) mice had higher FoxP3 expression (data not shown) and greater suppressor function on a per cell basis, as compared to WT Treg (Figure 8B). The absolute numbers of adoptively transferred WT Tregs were significantly reduced following IL-2/αCD40 treatment, whereas the numbers of MRL-Fas(lpr)Tregs remained unchanged (Figure 8C), consistent with the premise that transferred MRL-Fas(lpr) Tregs are not eliminated over the course of IL-2/αCD40 treatment. The primary tumor sizes in WT mice receiving MRL-Fas(lpr) Tregs were indistinguishable between VC and IL-2/αCD40 treatment groups, suggesting that the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 was abrogated in these mice (Figure 8D). In contrast, primary tumors in mice receiving WT Tregs were significantly reduced in IL-2/αCD40 treated mice, as compared to controls. Therefore, the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 is lost when Tregs are deficient in functional Fas expression, since these cells are unable to be removed.

Figure 8. Fas deficient Tregs are not removed from the tumor microenvironment and abrogate the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 therapy.

Figure 8

On various days post tumor-inoculation (Day 0), endogenous (eGFP+) and adoptively transferred (eGFP) leukocytes were analyzed in the blood, spleens and tumors of recipient mice (A). Cells were gated by forward and side scatter and CD45 expression. Samples were obtained from an IL-2/αCD40 treated mouse, representative of 5 mice. (B) The suppressive effects of WT and MRL-Fas(lpr) Tregs were compared. Teff cells from WT and MRL-Fas(lpr) mice were co-cultured with Tregs at the indicated ratios (the 10:0 ratio indicates control Teffs plated alone). (C) Tregs were enumerated from tumors by multiplying the percentage of CD4+/CD25+ cells by the number of CD45+ leukocytes (n=5; ** p<0.01 compared to VC). (D) Primary tumors were weighed on day 21 (n=10; * p<0.03 compared to VC).

The Fas-mediated loss of MDSC in the 4T1 tumor microenvironment is required for the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 therapy

Having established the importance of Fas-mediated Treg removal towards successful treatment of Renca tumors, we also explored the 4T1 tumor model since accumulation of MDSC in this model is well established. IL-2/αCD40 treatment significantly reduced 4T1 tumor area (Figure 9A). Although αCD40 controlled tumors out to day 14, the tumors eventually grew to be indistinguishable from controls. In MRL-Fas(lpr) mice, the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 was abolished (Figure 9B). We confirmed the requirement for the Fas-mediated removal of MDSC towards the efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 treatment by performing a similar adoptive transfer experiment to that described above for Renca/Tregs. When MDSC-depleted mice were reconstituted with MDSC from MRL-Fas(lpr) mice, the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 was abrogated (Figure 9C). In contrast, anti-tumor efficacy was retained in mice reconstituted with MDSC from WT mice, demonstrating the importance of Fas-mediated MDSC removal to the successful immunotherapy of 4T1 tumors.

Figure 9. The anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 in the 4T1 tumor model is dependent on Fas and Fas-deficient MDSC abrogate the anti-tumor efficacy of this therapy.

Figure 9

4T1 tumor-bearing mice were treated with VC or IL-2/αCD40 beginning on day 11 post-tumor inoculation. (A) Primary tumor area was measured bi-weekly beginning on day 7 (* p<0.03; ** p<0.01 as compared to all other treatment groups on days 18 and 21; 10 mice/group). (B) Primary tumors in MRL Fas mice were measured; the wildtype VC group is shown for comparison. (C) GR-1 depleted mice were reconstituted with MDSC from either WT (black bars) or MRL Fas (white bars) mice. Gray bars denote control mice which did not receive any depleting antibody or adoptive transfer. Primary tumors were weighed on day 21 (n=10; *** p<0.005 as compared to the corresponding VC).

Discussion

Several studies have highlighted susceptibility of Tregs and MDSC to Fas-dependent apoptosis, due to heightened activation under certain inflammatory conditions (9, 11, 12). Deng and colleagues recently showed the combination of irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically activated cytotoxic T cells and promoted MDSC apoptosis, although the mechanism in their study was mediated by TNF rather than IFNγ and a possible role for Fas was not shown (28). A role for Fas in the elimination of Tregs was also shown by intra-tumoral administration of FasL (14). Treg removal enhances tumor-specific immune responses and represents a critical component of cancer vaccine strategies (1, 2). In our study, we demonstrated that IL-2/αCD40 induces Fas-mediated elimination of Tregs and MDSC from the tumor microenvironment. We also demonstrated the importance of suppressor cell removal for durable anti-tumor responses following immunotherapy, although it needs to be recognized that the well-established immune dysregulation in MRL Fas(lpr) mice may complicate the interpretations of adoptive transfer studies. Although Fas ligand expression in RCC is associated with tumor stage, its coordinated upregulation in tumors after IL-2/αCD40 treatment transforms the tumor microenvironment into a setting where Fas-mediated preferential depletion of Tregs and MDSC occurs.

Lymphocyte sensitivity to apoptosis is regulated by the rate of cell proliferation. Tregs have faster turnover rates and higher sensitivity to apoptosis as compared to effector T cells (11, 12). Immunotherapies such as IL-2/αCD40 further increase proliferation-driven expansion of splenic Tregs (27). One of the most important cytokines to the suppressor function of Tregs is IL-2 (29, 30). Tregs are avid consumers of IL-2, and IL-2 decreases their susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis in vitro, even though they may express Fas (9, 11). It may appear paradoxical that IL-2-based immunotherapy renders Tregs more susceptible to apoptosis. However, the sensitivity of Tregs to Fas-induced apoptosis under in vitro culturing conditions was primarily modulated by direct cell-cell interactions between CD25+CD4+ and CD25CD4+ T cells (9) and competition between CD25+ Treg and CD25 Teff cells for IL-2 binding. It is therefore conceivable that the homeostatic effects of IL-2 in vivo during the course of immunotherapy are complex and capable of sensitizing Tregs to apoptosis through enhanced proliferation and the likely collaboration with other pro-inflammatory cytokines.

A critical component of IL-2/αCD40 immunotherapy is the infiltration of primary tumors by T and NK cells (23). Furthermore, the anti-tumor efficacy of IL-2/αCD40 depends upon CD8+ T cells, IFNγ and Fas signaling (22). We causally link these phenomena with the active elimination of suppressor cell populations from within primary tumors. The infiltration of tumors by CD8+ T cells is noteworthy, since they express Fas ligand and were essential for the apoptosis of suppressor cell populations. Fas ligand has also been described on Tregs, where it plays an important role in depleting effector Th1 cells (10, 31, 32). We also noted Fas ligand expression on Gr1Lo myeloid cells and Gr1Hi granulocytes, which can also induce apoptosis (33). Tumor-specific loss of Fas positive Tregs and MDSC might be attributed to upregulated Fas ligand expression throughout tumor tissue following IL-2/αCD40 immunotherapy.

Fas was expressed by Tregs and MDSC, as well as the tumor (34). Tregs (10, 31) and MDSC (15, 16) express Fas in vivo and MDSC were shown to apoptose in response to T cell-derived Fas ligand expression in vitro (16). Our findings provide mechanistic insight to these results, in that we demonstrate the in vivo potential for immunotherapies to render these cells amenable to Fas-mediated death. Whereas inflammation resulting from IL-2/αCD40 treatment reduced MDSC numbers in our study, another study, utilizing IL-1β overexpressed by 4T1 breast cancer cells showed reduced caspase activity in MDSC and protection from apoptosis (15). Several distinctions between that study and ours are noteworthy. First, the cellular (tumor versus hematopoietic cells) sources of inflammatory mediators may dictate MDSC susceptibility to apoptosis, particularly if levels of cytokines produced differ (endogenous versus ectopic over-expression). Second, the profile of which cytokines predominate may contribute to the susceptibility of MDSC to apoptosis. IL-1β may result in protection of MDSC from apoptosis, whereas other Th1 cytokines (e.g. IFNγ, IL-12) principally associated with IL-2/αCD40 therapy and TNF following irradiation/anti PD-L1 combination therapy (28) may favor their susceptibility to cell death.

The dramatic contrast between Treg and MDSC loss in the primary tumor and their peripheral expansion might be attributed to tissue-specific factors, namely the preferential expression of IFNγ by activated CD8+ cells and engagement of the Fas/Fas ligand signaling pathway in the tumor microenvironment. Although tumor-associated Fas/Fas ligand expression has been associated with killing of activated T cells (18, 20) and poor survival in RCC (19), our results highlight the potential for immunotherapeutic strategies capable of harnessing this pathway to elicit the removal of Fas-sensitive immunoregulatory cells specifically within the tumor microenvironment.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Marston Linehan and Youfeng Yang of the Urologic Oncology Branch, NCI for analysis of human RCC. We thank Drs. John Ortaldo and Giorgio Trinchieri for critically reviewing this manuscript. We thank Donna Butcher of the Pathology/Histotechnology Laboratory for immunohistochemical staining.

References

  • 1.Le DT, Jaffee EM. Regulatory T-cell modulation using cyclophosphamide in vaccine approaches: a current perspective. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3439–3444. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Poehlein CH, Haley DP, Walker EB, Fox BA. Depletion of tumor-induced Treg prior to reconstitution rescues enhanced priming of tumor-specific, therapeutic effector T cells in lymphopenic hosts. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:3121–3133. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ko JS, Zea AH, Rini BI, Ireland JL, Elson P, Cohen P, Golshayan A, Rayman PA, Wood L, Garcia J, Dreicer R, Bukowski R, Finke JH. Sunitinib mediates reversal of myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation in renal cell carcinoma patients. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2009;15:2148–2157. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen JJ, Sun Y, Nabel GJ. Regulation of the proinflammatory effects of Fas ligand (CD95L) Science. 1998;282:1714–1717. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5394.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alderson MR, Tough TW, Davis-Smith T, Braddy S, Falk B, Schooley KA, Goodwin RG, Smith CA, Ramsdell F, Lynch DH. Fas ligand mediates activation-induced cell death in human T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1995;181:71–77. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Krammer PH. CD95’s deadly mission in the immune system. Nature. 2000;407:789–795. doi: 10.1038/35037728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muzio M, Chinnaiyan AM, Kischkel FC, O’Rourke K, Shevchenko A, Ni J, Scaffidi C, Bretz JD, Zhang M, Gentz R, Mann M, Krammer PH, Peter ME, Dixit VM. FLICE, a novel FADD-homologous ICE/CED-3-like protease, is recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death--inducing signaling complex. Cell. 1996;85:817–827. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81266-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kischkel FC, Hellbardt S, Behrmann I, Germer M, Pawlita M, Krammer PH, Peter ME. Cytotoxicity-dependent APO-1 (Fas/CD95)-associated proteins form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) with the receptor. Embo J. 1995;14:5579–5588. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00245.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Banz A, Pontoux C, Papiernik M. Modulation of Fas-dependent apoptosis: a dynamic process controlling both the persistence and death of CD4 regulatory T cells and effector T cells. J Immunol. 2002;169:750–757. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.2.750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yolcu ES, Ash S, Kaminitz A, Sagiv Y, Askenasy N, Yarkoni S. Apoptosis as a mechanism of T-regulatory cell homeostasis and suppression. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:650–658. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fisson S, Darrasse-Jeze G, Litvinova E, Septier F, Klatzmann D, Liblau R, Salomon BL. Continuous activation of autoreactive CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in the steady state. J Exp Med. 2003;198:737–746. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fritzsching B, Oberle N, Eberhardt N, Quick S, Haas J, Wildemann B, Krammer PH, Suri-Payer E. In contrast to effector T cells, CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells are highly susceptible to CD95 ligand-but not to TCR-mediated cell death. J Immunol. 2005;175:32–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fritzsching B, Oberle N, Pauly E, Geffers R, Buer J, Poschl J, Krammer P, Linderkamp O, Suri-Payer E. Naive regulatory T cells: a novel subpopulation defined by resistance toward CD95L-mediated cell death. Blood. 2006;108:3371–3378. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-005660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen A, Liu S, Park D, Kang Y, Zheng G. Depleting intratumoral CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells via FasL protein transfer enhances the therapeutic efficacy of adoptive T cell transfer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1291–1298. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chornoguz O, Grmai L, Sinha P, Artemenko KA, Zubarev RA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Proteomic pathway analysis reveals inflammation increases myeloid-derived suppressor cell resistance to apoptosis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10:M110 002980. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.002980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sinha P, Chornoguz O, Clements VK, Artemenko KA, Zubarev RA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells express the death receptor Fas and apoptose in response to T cell-expressed FasL. Blood. 2011;117:5381–5390. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elsasser-Beile U, Gierschner D, Welchner T, Wetterauer U. Different expression of Fas and Fas ligand in tumor infiltrating and peripheral lymphocytes of patients with renal cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:433–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Das T, Sa G, Paszkiewicz-Kozik E, Hilston C, Molto L, Rayman P, Kudo D, Biswas K, Bukowski RM, Finke JH, Tannenbaum CS. Renal cell carcinoma tumors induce T cell apoptosis through receptor-dependent and receptor-independent pathways. J Immunol. 2008;180:4687–4696. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sejima T, Morizane S, Hinata N, Yao A, Isoyama T, Saito M, Takenaka A. Fas expression in renal cell carcinoma accurately predicts patient survival after radical nephrectomy. Urol Int. 2012;88:263–270. doi: 10.1159/000334453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.O’Connell J, Bennett MW, O’Sullivan GC, Collins JK, Shanahan F. Fas counter-attack--the best form of tumor defense? Nat Med. 1999;5:267–268. doi: 10.1038/6477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Williams PD, Pontes EJ, Murphy GP. Studies of the growth of a murine renal cell carcinoma and its metastatic patterns. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1981;34:345–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murphy WJ, Welniak L, Back T, Hixon J, Subleski J, Seki N, Wigginton JM, Wilson SE, Blazar BR, Malyguine AM, Sayers TJ, Wiltrout RH. Synergistic anti-tumor responses after administration of agonistic antibodies to CD40 and IL-2: coordination of dendritic and CD8+ cell responses. J Immunol. 2003;170:2727–2733. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weiss JM, Back TC, Scarzello AJ, Subleski JJ, Hall VL, Stauffer JK, Chen X, Micic D, Alderson K, Murphy WJ, Wiltrout RH. Successful immunotherapy with IL-2/anti-CD40 induces the chemokine-mediated mitigation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19455–19460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909474106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kayagaki N, Yamaguchi N, Nagao F, Matsuo S, Maeda H, Okumura K, Yagita H. Polymorphism of murine Fas ligand that affects the biological activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3914–3919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang Q, Adams JY, Penaranda C, Melli K, Piaggio E, Sgouroudis E, Piccirillo CA, Salomon BL, Bluestone JA. Central role of defective interleukin-2 production in the triggering of islet autoimmune destruction. Immunity. 2008;28:687–697. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alderson KL, Zhou Q, Berner V, Wilkins DE, Weiss JM, Blazar BR, Welniak LA, Wiltrout RH, Redelman D, Murphy WJ. Regulatory and conventional CD4+ T cells show differential effects correlating with PD-1 and B7-H1 expression after immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2008;180:2981–2988. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.2981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deng L, Liang H, Burnette B, Beckett M, Darga T, Weichselbaum RR, Fu YX. Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:687–695. doi: 10.1172/JCI67313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Setoguchi R, Hori S, Takahashi T, Sakaguchi S. Homeostatic maintenance of natural Foxp3(+) CD25(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cells by interleukin (IL)-2 and induction of autoimmune disease by IL-2 neutralization. J Exp Med. 2005;201:723–735. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. A function for interleukin 2 in Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1142–1151. doi: 10.1038/ni1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Strauss L, Bergmann C, Whiteside TL. Human circulating CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ regulatory T cells kill autologous CD8+ but not CD4+ responder cells by Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Immunol. 2009;182:1469–1480. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weber SE, Harbertson J, Godebu E, Mros GA, Padrick RC, Carson BD, Ziegler SF, Bradley LM. Adaptive islet-specific regulatory CD4 T cells control autoimmune diabetes and mediate the disappearance of pathogenic Th1 cells in vivo. J Immunol. 2006;176:4730–4739. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.4730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Serrao KL, Fortenberry JD, Owens ML, Harris FL, Brown LA. Neutrophils induce apoptosis of lung epithelial cells via release of soluble Fas ligand. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001;280:L298–305. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.2.L298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee JK, Seki N, Sayers TJ, Subleski J, Gruys EM, Murphy WJ, Wiltrout RH. Constitutive expression of functional CD40 on mouse renal cancer cells: induction of Fas and Fas-mediated killing by CD40L. Cell Immunol. 2005;235:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES