Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Neurol. 2013 Dec 18;50(4):337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.12.012

Patterns of structural reorganization of the corticospinal tract in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome

David O Kamson 1,3, Csaba Juhász 1,2,3, Joseph Shin 3, Michael E Behen 1,3, William C Guy 3, Harry T Chugani 1,2,3, Jeong-Won Jeong 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC4048917  NIHMSID: NIHMS567213  PMID: 24507695

Abstract

Background

Reorganization of the corticospinal tract (CST) after early damage can limit motor deficit. In this study, we explored patterns of structural CST reorganization in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome.

Methods

Five children (age 1.5-7 years) with motor deficit due to unilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome were studied prospectively and longitudinally (1-2 years follow-up). CST segments belonging to hand and leg movements were separated, and their volume was measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography using a recently validated method. CST segmental volumes were normalized and compared between the SWS children and age-matched healthy controls. Volume changes during follow-up were also compared to clinical motor symptoms.

Results

In the SWS children, hand-related (but not leg-related) CST volumes were consistently decreased in the affected cerebral hemisphere at baseline. At follow-up, two distinct patterns of hand CST volume changes emerged: (i) Two children with extensive frontal lobe damage showed a CST volume decrease in the lesional hemisphere and a concomitant increase in the non-lesional (contralateral) hemisphere. These children developed good hand grasp but no fine motor skills. (ii) The three other children, with relative sparing of the frontal lobe, showed an interval increase of the normalized hand CST volume in the affected hemisphere; these children showed no gross motor deficit at follow-up.

Conclusions

DTI tractography can detect differential abnormalities in the hand CST segment both ipsi- and contralateral to the lesion. Interval increase in the CST hand segment suggests structural reorganization, whose pattern may determine clinical motor outcome and could guide strategies for early motor intervention.

Keywords: Sturge-Weber syndrome, corticospinal tract, motor deficit, reorganization, diffusion tensor imaging, tractography, longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

The corticospinal tract (CST) is one of the most important pathways of the brain, connecting the motor cortex to the spinal cord, enabling voluntary motor control of the limbs. About 80-90% of CST fibers cross to the contralateral side in the medulla and exert motor control of the contralateral limbs, while some fibers, especially those related to the trunk and proximal upper extremity motor functions, remain uncrossed.1,2 Although the normal anatomy of the CST is well studied, we have less knowledge about its structural development and reorganization following brain injury. According to data obtained using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with unilateral CST injury, the brain can utilize several different compensatory strategies to restore motor functions.3 One of these mechanisms involves the ipsilateral CST projections that can take over control of the paretic limbs to a certain extent.4,5 If a unilateral CST injury occurs during early life, the ipsilateral projections may remain permanent instead of being eliminated.4,5 If CST injury is inflicted at an older age, e.g., in adult stroke patients, the compensatory recruitment of remaining (although limited) ipsilateral CST projections can occur.5 Occasional recovery of the affected CST has also been well documented.3

Our knowledge about the CST has been expanded by radiographic information provided by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). DTI enables the in vivo study of neural tracts based on water diffusion along the axons.6-8 While DTI has been widely used to study the anatomy and reorganization of the CST after injury, the current techniques mainly investigate the CST as a whole, disregarding possible differences in the segments related to the upper vs. lower limb motor control. Our group has recently developed and validated a novel DTI approach to separate and quantify function-specific segments, associated with hand vs. leg vs. face movements, of the CST.9-12 In the present longitudinal study, we utilized this approach in a small pediatric population with early unilateral brain injury and motor deficit due to Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS). SWS is characterized by facial port-wine birthmarks and leptomeningeal vascular malformation.13 Clinical symptoms, including motor deficit, cognitive decline and seizures, commonly manifest in the first year of life.14 As the leptomeningeal involvement and underlying brain damage is limited to one hemisphere in 85% of the cases, SWS is an excellent clinical model for studying reorganization of the brain, including the CST, after an early (often ongoing) postnatal unilateral brain injury.15,16 In this study, we hypothesized differential changes in the CST segments associated with hand vs. leg motor control, and also looked for patterns of structural reorganization and their relation to clinical symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects

Five children (3 boys, 2 girls) with unilateral SWS and some degree of motor dysfunction, and 24 control children were selected for the study. All SWS children participated in a prospective, longitudinal clinical and neuroimaging study of children with SWS approved by the Wayne State University Human Investigations Committee (WSU HIC). Parents signed the Informed Consent Form. For each patient, MR scans were acquired at two time points, at least 1 year apart (see clinical data in Table 1). Evaluation of motor functions was performed on the day of the MR scans. Clinical assessment of gross motor functions was performed by a pediatric neurologist (HTC), and presence and severity of hand weakness (with or without grasp) was noted. Gross motor functions were also assessed via standardized semi-structured interview (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales- 2nd Edition), and, in children with no gross motor abnormalities, fine motor dexterity was also assessed by Purdue Pegboard task (30 months to 5 years of age) or the Grooved Pegboard task (above 5 years of age) by a certified pediatric neuropsychologist (MEB).17-19 MR DTI data in the SWS patients were compared to age-matched control groups of 4-4 normal subjects, with a total of 24 control children (3 normal groups at baseline and 3 at follow-up; due to similar age, patients 1-3 shared the same control groups for both the first and the second time point, see Table 1). These children were selected from a clinical DTI database of children who underwent MRI at our hospital due to history of seizures. None of the control children had structural lesions on MRI, and none of them had motor impairment or significant developmental delay based on their clinical reports. We had permission form the WSU HIC to use the clinically acquired MRI scans from these children after de-identification.

Table 1.

Clinical data of the study subjects

Patient Sex Age at 1st neuro symptoms Age SWS angioma location Additional MRI findings Hand motor functions Control groups


Baseline Follow-up Baseline Follow-up mean age±SD
1 M 0.3y 1.5y 2.5y L-FTPO L-FTPO atrophy R paresis same, but grasp improved
2 F 0.4y 1.8y 3.1y R-TPO R-F atrophy L paresis same, but grasp improved 1.5±0.6y 2.8±0.3y
3 F 0.1y 1.7y 2.7y R-TPOF limited R-F atrophy L paresis improved; fine motor
4 M 0.9y 4.4y 5.4y R-P R-P atrophy mild L fine motor normal 4.3±0.3y 5.5±0.6y
5 M 7.0y 10.0y 12.0y R-TPO R-TPO atrophy, small subcortical infarct L fine motor L fine motor 9.4±0.5y 12.7±1.6y

Abbreviations: M=male; F=female; y=year(s); L=left; R=right; F=frontal; P=parietal; O=occipital; T=temporal; SWS=Sturge-Weber syndrome; SD=standard deviation

MRI acquisitions

For children with SWS, a Siemens MAGNETOM Trio 3T scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen) with a standard head array coil was used to acquire diffusion weighted images at TR = 6,600 ms, TE = 97 ms, FOV = 256 mm, matrix size = 128×128, slice thickness = 2 mm, and zero gap covering the whole brain using 64 isotropic gradient directions with b= 1000s/mm2, one b=0 acquisition, and NEX=2. All children had additional native and post-contrast MRI sequences to establish the diagnosis of SWS and the extent of brain involvement. For the controls, clinical MR scans were performed on a 3T GE-Signa scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) equipped with an 8-channel head coil and ASSET. DWI was acquired with a multi-slice single shot diffusion weighted echo-planar-imaging (EPI) sequence at repetition time (TR) = 12,500 ms, echo time (TE) = 88.7 ms, field of view (FOV) = 240 mm, 128×128 acquisition matrix (nominal resolution = 1.89mm), contiguous 3mm thickness in order to cover entire axial slices of whole brain using 55 isotropic gradient directions with b=1000s/mm2, one b=0 acquisition, and number of excitations (NEX)=1.12 Approximate scanning time for the acquisition was about 12 minutes using double refocusing pulse sequence to reduce eddy current artifacts. Sedation during the scanning was performed with pentobarbital (3 mg/kg) followed by fentanyl (1μg/kg).

DTI analysis of the cortico-spinal tract segments (hand and leg)

Whole brain ICA+BSM (independent component analysis combined with a ball-stick model) tractograpy was performed to reconstruct streamlines of white matter fibers, as described previously.9,10 To identify two segments of streamlines associated with primary motor pathways of hand and leg, maximum a posteriori probability classifier was applied, which can automatically classify individual streamlines into one of three segments, hand, leg, and face, based on their stereotactic atlases constructed from healthy children.11 For each segment, a streamline visitation map was created by the number of streamlines passing through each voxel. Voxels having more than 5 visits were assumed to belong to each motor pathway. Streamline volume was measured by calculating the total volume of all voxels belonging to the pathway. Finally, relative (i.e., normalized) streamline volume of the CST segments (hand and leg) was obtained by normalizing the streamline volume to the white matter volume of the non-lesional hemisphere in SWS and to the corresponding hemisphere in controls.

RESULTS

Relative streamline volumes in the hand and leg CST segments

In the normal control groups, relative CST streamline volumes were relatively stable across age groups, i.e., they showed no clear age-related changes in the hand or leg CST segments. Relative streamline volumes in the leg segment were consistently lower on the right as compared to the left side (Figure 1). In the SWS patients, the relative streamline volumes showed different distributions in the hand and leg CST segments (Figure 1). The hand-related CST volumes in the lesional hemispheres were lower than those of the non-lesional hemispheres in every patient (p= .005; Wilcoxon's test) and also lower than the values of the age-matched control groups in all cases, except the oldest SWS patient with minimal motor dysfunction (p< .001; Mann-Whitney's test). The distributions of leg-related relative streamline volumes were more variable, but they were within or even above the normal range in 70% (7/10) of the cases (counting the 5 baseline and 5 follow-up measurements) in the affected hemisphere.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Normalized hand- and leg-related CST streamline volumes of the non-lesional (blue) and lesional (red) hemispheres of patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome, and of the left (light gray) and right (dark gray) hemispheres of the age-matched control groups. The 2 standard deviation range of CST streamline volume of the control groups are shown (black error bars). The CST streamline volumes have been normalized to the white matter volume of the nonlesional hemisphere in the Sturge-Weber group, and to the ipsilateral white matter volume in the controls. The left and right diagrams represent two patterns of longitudinal changes in hand-related relative streamline volumes. Group 1 had interval decrease of hand-related streamline volume ipislateral to the lesion, but an increase in contralateral CST volume; this was associated with persistent weakness but good hand grasp. Group 2 showed interval increase of hand-related relative streamline volume in the lesional hemisphere associated with gaining or retaining good hand motor functions on follow-up.

Interval changes in CST streamline volume and hand motor functions: two distinct patterns

Based on the CST streamline volume and corresponding motor status changes between the first and second time points in the SWS children, two distinct patterns were observed: (1) patients #1 and 2, with extensive hemispheric damage on MRI, including the frontal lobe, showed an interval decrease in relative streamline volume of the hand-related CST segment in the lesional hemisphere, and a concomitant increase in the volume in the non-lesional (contralateral) hemisphere at follow-up (Figure 1A; Figure 2). Although their weakness persisted, both of them developed a good grasp in the affected hand by this time. (2) Patients # 3-5 (all with partial or complete sparing of the frontal lobe on MRI) showed an interval increase in the hand-related relative streamline volume in the lesional hemisphere, although the volumes were still below the normal range at follow-up in patients #3 and 4. Contralateral streamline volumes were within the normal range (mean ± 2SD) in all but one case (Figure 1 B). None of these patients had gross motor weakness at follow-up, although two of them showed mild fine motor impairment (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative examples of CST reorganization patterns in children with unilateral SWS. Patient 1 (upper panel; see also Table 1) with left hemispheric SWS involvement showed abnormally low streamline volume on the affected side at both time points, but an interval increase of the contralateral hand CST segment was observed during the 1-year follow-up. Patient 4 (lower images) with right hemispheric (parietal angioma) involvement showed an interval increase of the hand segment ipsilateral to the lesion. White arrows denote streamlines increased on the follow-up scan, as compared to the baseline.

DISCUSSION

The two main findings of this study include: (i) consistently lower CST streamline volume in the hand segment (but not in the leg segment) in the affected hemisphere, and (ii) the presence of two patterns of longitudinal changes in hand-related relative CST volumes, suggesting two distinct forms of structural reorganization associated with different functional outcomes. The interval decrease of the relative volume of the hand segment of the affected CST, observed in two young children (#1 and 2), is consistent with the notion that SWS is often a progressive disorder. The concomitant increase of contralateral (non-lesional) CST streamline volumes in these two children likely represents an adaptive mechanism through the ipsilateral (uncrossed) motor pathway. This was particularly striking in the youngest child (patient #1), where the affected CST hand segment volume dropped to a very low value at follow-up, while the contralateral volume was high at baseline and increased further, extending above the normal range at follow-up. Both of these children (#1 and 2) had extensive hemispheric damage, involving the frontal lobe, and they achieved a good hand grasp but no fine motor skills at follow-up. These features are consistent with previous studies using fMRI and TMS documenting that extensive early-onset lesions were associated with ipsilateral motor recovery mechanisms.20 The efficacy of ipsilateral CST reorganization is strong in infancy although starts to decline as early as in the prenatal period.4 Still, there is ample evidence that ipsilateral CST projections remain functional during the first several years of postnatal life, and they retain plasticity, which can be induced by a damage of contralateral CST projections.21-23 Our findings strongly suggest that such plasticity can result in an enlarged CST volume detectable by DTI. Although our CST tracking did not separate fibers that eventually cross at the level of the medulla from those which remain ipsilateral, it is likely that the increase in volume involved ipsilateral fibers, which contributed to the hand grasp observed in these children. Since the CST in the affected hemisphere was severely damaged but not completely destroyed in either patient, the role of partial reorganization in the affected hemisphere (e.g., in CST segments that normally do not serve hand motor functions) could not be excluded. Future studies separating fibers that cross vs. those which do not cross in the medulla can further address this issue; feasibility of such separation by DTI tractography has been demonstrated recently.24

The remaining three children (#3-5), with complete or partial sparing of the frontal lobe in the affected hemisphere, showed an interval increase of the relative CST volume ipsilateral to the angioma, suggesting a partial recovery in the hand segment. This was most striking in patient #3, where the CST hand segment was barely detectable at baseline but was close to the normal range at 1-year follow-up. All these three children obtained or retained good gross hand motor functions during follow-up, consistent with a limited CST injury, which apparently did not prompt structural reorganization in the contralateral CST segments. Microstructural recovery of the damaged CST has been demonstrated in previous studies involving adult stroke patients, both in cross-sectional and longitudinal settings.25-29 The ultimate clinical outcome after CST injury is likely the net effect of CST damage and compensatory remodeling affecting both the ipsi- and contralateral tracts.29 Detection and quantitative analysis of various CST segments, linked to hand vs. leg motor functions, allows a more detailed analysis of imaging correlates of clinical motor deficits.

Limited hand motor functions in children can be a source of considerable impairment of quality of life. The findings of this pilot study indicate that the applied DTI tractography method, which can separate CST segments associated with hand and leg function, is able to detect subtle, microstructural hand CST alterations in children, including those with mild motor deficit.12 This can be particularly important in young children, where objective, accurate assessment of clinical motor deficit is difficult. Detection of CST damage may guide early motor intervention, such as constraint-induced movement therapy, which can induce changes in motor activation measured by fMRI in chronic stroke patients.30 Longitudinal changes in DTI parameters of the CST (e.g., increasing fractional anisotropy) can occur during spontaneous motor recovery after stroke.25 Increase in fiber volume was also reported in the arcuate fasciculus after intense speech therapy in aphasic patients,31 and also in the right arcuate fasciculus after surgical resection of the left arcuate fasciculus in children who underwent epilepsy surgery.32 The activity of the motor cortex, ipsi- or contralateral to the lesion, can be altered by repetitive TMS.23,33-35 Our results suggest that DTI has the capacity to evaluate the early structural reorganization pattern after CST injury and may also assess effects of interventions aiming to improve motor functions.

This pilot study has several limitations. The number of patients was small, and the observed patterns of CST changes need to be confirmed in larger groups and after longer follow-up, where additional patterns may also emerge. We did not have a well-defined clinical measure for leg motor functions, although the streamline volume changes did not suggest any obvious imaging pattern of reorganization for the leg-related CST segments. A potential pitfall is the use of different MR scanners for data acquisition in SWS children vs. normal controls, although analysis was done with the same software. However, our main findings of interval changes in relative streamline volumes did not require the control group, which was used to assess if these volumes in the SWS children were in the normal range. We believe that the use of relative (rather than absolute) streamline volumes diminished interscanner variability as well as age-dependence of the measured values, and the use of age-matched controls groups made these comparisons even more reliable. Interscanner variability is an increasing problem in longitudinal MRI studies and multicenter collaborations due to frequent scanner upgrades and developing technology.36 Therefore, future larger-scale studies will likely encounter this issue. Our pilot study suggests that despite these limitations, DTI is sensitive to detect CST injury related to hand motor deficit and to study different patterns of structural reorganization. This approach could enhance the assessment of the severity of early CST damage, predict prognosis, advise targeted interventions and give feedback for rehabilitative methods in children with early motor injury.

Acknowledgements

We thank Cathie Germain, MA, for assisting patient recruitment and scheduling, Majid Janabi MD, Jane Cornett RN and Anne Deboard RN for performing sedation, and Xuan Yang, BS, for assisting MRI data acquisition. We are also grateful to the Sturge-Weber Foundation and the families who participated in these studies. This study was partially funded by a grant from the NIH (R01 NS041922 to C.J.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lacroix S, Havton LA, McKay H, et al. Bilateral corticospinal projections arise from each motor cortex in the macaque monkey: a quantitative study. J Comp Neurol. 2004;473(2):147–161. doi: 10.1002/cne.20051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Montgomery LR, Herbert WJ, Buford JA. Recruitment of ipsilateral and contralateral upper limb muscles following stimulation of the cortical motor areas in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 2013;230(2):153–164. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3639-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jang SH. A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies on motor recovery mechanisms in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(4):345–352. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Staudt M, Gerloff C, Grodd W, Holthausen H, Niemann G, Krägeloh-Mann I. Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(6):854–863. doi: 10.1002/ana.20297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eyre JA, Taylor JP, Villagra F, Smith M, Miller S. Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development. Neurology. 2001;57(9):1543–1554. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.9.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Conturo TE, Lori NF, Cull TS, et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. PNAS. 1999;96(18):10422–10427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mori S, Kaufmann WE, Pearlson GD, et al. In vivo visualization of human neural pathways by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2000;47(3):412–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lazar M. Mapping brain anatomical connectivity using white matter tractography. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(7):821–835. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jeong JW, Chugani HT, Juhász C. Localization of function-specific segments of the primary motor pathway in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome: A multimodal imaging analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Mar 5; doi: 10.1002/jmri.24076. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeong JW, Asano E, Yeh FC, Chugani DC, Chugani HT. Independent component analysis tractography combined with a ball-stick model to isolate intravoxel crossing fibers of the corticospinal tracts in clinical diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70(2):441–453. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jeong JW, Asano E, Brown EC, Tiwari VN, Chugani DC, Chugani HT. Automatic detection of primary motor areas using diffusion MRI tractography: comparison with functional MRI and electrical stimulation mapping. Epilepsia. 2013;54(8):1381–1390. doi: 10.1111/epi.12199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jeong JW, Asano E, Juhász C, Chugani HT. Quantification of primary motor pathways using diffusion MRI tractography and its application to predict postoperative motor deficits in children with focal epilepsy. Hum Brain Mapping. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22396. (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thomas-Sohl KA, Vaslow DF, Maria BL. Sturge-Weber syndrome: a review. Pediatr Neurol. 2004;30(5):303–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2003.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Comi AM, Roach ES, Bodensteiner JB. Neurological manifestations of Sturge-Weber syndrome. In: Sturge-Weber syndrome. In: Bodensteiner JB, Roach ES, editors. The Sturge-Weber Foundation. Mt. Freedom; New York: 2010. pp. 69–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sivaswamy L, Rajamani K, Juhász C, Maqbool M, Makki M, Chugani HT. The corticospinal tract in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome: a diffusion tensor tractography study. Brain Dev. 2008;30(7):447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Behen ME, Juhász C, Wolfe-Christensen C, et al. Brain damage and IQ in unilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome: support for a “fresh start” hypothesis. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;22(2):352–357. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. 2nd edition. Pearson Assessments; Minneapolis, MN: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:234–247. doi: 10.1037/h0061266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Trites RL. Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Task. Lafayette Instrument Company; Lafayette, IN: 1989. Instruction/Owner`s Manual. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Stitz J, Krägeloh-Mann I. Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. Brain. 2002;125(10):2222–2237. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Müller K, Kass-Iliyya F, Reitz M. Ontogeny of ipsilateral corticospinal projections: a developmental study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ann Neurol. 1997;42(5):705–711. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eyre JA. Corticospinal tract development and its plasticity after perinatal injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(8):1136–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jang SH. A review of the ipsilateral motor pathway as a recovery mechanism in patients with stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(4):315–320. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kwon HG, Lee DG, Son SM, et al. Identification of the anterior corticospinal tract in the human brain using diffusion tensor imaging. Neurosci Lett. 2011;505(3):238–241. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jang SH, Byun WM, Han BS, et al. Recovery of a partially damaged corticospinal tract in a patient with intracerebral hemorrhage: a diffusion tensor image study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(1):25–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jang SH, Kim SH, Cho SH, Choi BY, Cho YW. Demonstration of motor recovery process in a patient with intracerebral hemorrhage. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(2):141–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang DS, Kim DS, Kim YH, Jang SH. Demonstration of recovery of a severely damaged corticospinal tract: a diffusion tensor tractography and transcranial magnetic stimulation follow-up study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32(3):418–420. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31811eba4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pannek K, Chalk JB, Finnigan S, Rose SE. Dynamic corticospinal white matter connectivity changes during stroke recovery: a diffusion tensor probabilistic tractography study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(3):529–536. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schaechter JD, Fricker ZP, Perdue KL, et al. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(11):3461–3474. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Könönen M, Tarkka IM, Niskanen E, et al. Functional MRI and motor behavioral changes obtained with constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(4):578–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A. Evidence for plasticity in white-matter tracts of patients with chronic Broca's aphasia undergoing intense intonation-based speech therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1169:385–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04587.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goradia D, Chugani HT, Govindan RM, Behen M, Juhász C, Sood S. Reorganization of the right arcuate fasciculus following left arcuate fasciculus resection in children with intractable epilepsy. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(10):1246–1251. doi: 10.1177/0883073811402689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Théoret H, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology. 2004;62(1):91–98. doi: 10.1212/wnl.62.1.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1802–1804. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000161839.38079.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37(8):2115–2122. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000231390.58967.6b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Takao H, Hayashi N, Ohtomo K. Effect of scanner in asymmetry studies using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2011;54(2):1053–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES