Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2014 May 31;70(Pt 6):o724. doi: 10.1107/S1600536814012021

5-[(2-Hy­droxy­eth­yl)(meth­yl)amino]­thio­phene-2-carbaldehyde

Xian-Shun Sun a,b, Nan-Qi Shao a,b, Dan-Dan Li a,b,*
PMCID: PMC4050996  PMID: 24940293

Abstract

In the title compound, C8H11NO2S, the aldehyde group is approximately coplanar with the thio­phene ring [maximum deviation = 0.023 (2) Å]. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into supra­molecular chains propagating along the a-axis direction.

Related literature  

For potential applications of thio­phene derivatives, see: Encinas (2002). For a related thio­phene derivative, see: Perašínová et al. (2006).graphic file with name e-70-0o724-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C8H11NO2S

  • M r = 185.24

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 15.764 (5) Å

  • b = 5.136 (5) Å

  • c = 11.028 (5) Å

  • V = 892.9 (10) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.32 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker SMART 1000 CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • 5828 measured reflections

  • 1564 independent reflections

  • 1514 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.020

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.024

  • wR(F 2) = 0.067

  • S = 1.08

  • 1564 reflections

  • 111 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.13 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 756 Friedel pairs

  • Absolute structure parameter: −0.03 (7)

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, Global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814012021/xu5786sup1.cif

e-70-0o724-sup1.cif (15.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814012021/xu5786Isup2.hkl

e-70-0o724-Isup2.hkl (77.2KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814012021/xu5786Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 996513

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i 0.82 1.93 2.751 (2) 174

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 21271004), the Education Committee of Anhui Province (grant No. KJ2010A030) and the Undergraduate Innovative Test Program in Anhui University.

supplementary crystallographic information

1. Comment

The introduction about the highpolarizability of sulfur atoms in thiophene rings leads to a stabilization of the conjugated chain and to excellent charge transport properties. Functional thiophene derivatives have attracted comprehensive interest among researchers all over the world and have actually been advanced to be among the most frequently used π-conjugated materials, in particular as active components in organic electronic devices and molecular electronics (Encinas et al., 2002). In the title compound (I) (Fig. 1), the S1—C4 bond length of 1.7398 (18) Å is longer than the corresponding S1—C15 bond length of 1.708 (2) Å in related thiophene derivative (Perašínová et al. 2006), which is due to the fact that there is a higher π-electron delocalized system in the molecule 5-(fluoren-9-ylidenemethyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde. In the crystal structure of (I), the molecules are interconnected, via hydrogen bonds (Table 1) [O1—H1···O2i; symmetry codes: (i) x - 1/2, -y, z], forming a one-dimensional structure (Fig. 2).

2. Experimental

A 0.86 g (4.5 mmol) amount of 5-bromothiophene-2-carbaldehyde, 1.13 g (15 mmol) of 2-(methylamino)ethanol, and 0.1 g of toluene-4-sulfonic acid were mixed and stirred at a bath temperature of 373 K for 20 h. The mixture was cooled, 25 mL of water was added. The organic layer and dichloromethane extracts were combined, washed with water, and dried over MgSO4. Evaporation of the solvent, purification by column chromatography. 1H NMR: (400 Hz, DMSO-d6), d(p.p.m.):9.40 (s, 1H), 7.65 (d, 1H), 6.12 (d, 1H), 4.87 (t, 1H), 3.62 (q, 2H), 3.47 (t, 2H), 3.09 (s, 3H).

3. Refinement

All H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions (C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å) and allowed to ride on their parent atoms with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(C) and Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(O)

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

: The molecular structure of the title compound (I) showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

: The crystal packing of (I), showing O—H···O hydrogen-bonding interactions as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C8H11NO2S F(000) = 392
Mr = 185.24 Dx = 1.378 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pca21 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2ac Cell parameters from 3223 reflections
a = 15.764 (5) Å θ = 2.6–26.8°
b = 5.136 (5) Å µ = 0.32 mm1
c = 11.028 (5) Å T = 293 K
V = 892.9 (10) Å3 Block, yellow
Z = 4 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1000 CCD area-detector diffractometer 1514 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.020
Graphite monochromator θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
phi and ω scans h = −17→18
5828 measured reflections k = −5→6
1564 independent reflections l = −13→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.067 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0417P)2 + 0.0567P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1564 reflections Δρmax = 0.14 e Å3
111 parameters Δρmin = −0.13 e Å3
1 restraint Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 756 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Absolute structure parameter: −0.03 (7)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.53676 (3) 0.28672 (8) 0.22080 (5) 0.04276 (14)
O1 0.32880 (9) 0.3310 (3) 0.35492 (15) 0.0575 (4)
H1 0.2888 0.2479 0.3274 0.086*
N1 0.40014 (10) 0.5376 (3) 0.13076 (14) 0.0446 (4)
C4 0.45817 (10) 0.3498 (4) 0.11400 (16) 0.0385 (4)
C5 0.46620 (12) 0.1849 (4) 0.01313 (18) 0.0459 (5)
H5 0.4301 0.1889 −0.0535 0.055*
C6 0.53411 (13) 0.0157 (4) 0.02439 (17) 0.0501 (5)
H6 0.5479 −0.1056 −0.0351 0.060*
C7 0.57958 (11) 0.0402 (4) 0.12977 (19) 0.0457 (4)
O2 0.68678 (9) −0.0828 (4) 0.26743 (18) 0.0723 (5)
C2 0.39359 (13) 0.6822 (3) 0.24362 (18) 0.0460 (5)
H2A 0.3870 0.8658 0.2251 0.055*
H2B 0.4459 0.6617 0.2888 0.055*
C1 0.33673 (14) 0.5845 (5) 0.0376 (2) 0.0583 (6)
H1A 0.3644 0.6127 −0.0389 0.087*
H1B 0.3040 0.7356 0.0585 0.087*
H1C 0.2999 0.4362 0.0315 0.087*
C8 0.64980 (13) −0.1077 (4) 0.1692 (2) 0.0553 (5)
H8 0.6700 −0.2351 0.1167 0.066*
C3 0.32038 (12) 0.5959 (4) 0.32204 (19) 0.0490 (5)
H3A 0.3184 0.7022 0.3947 0.059*
H3B 0.2676 0.6204 0.2783 0.059*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0454 (2) 0.0426 (2) 0.0403 (2) 0.00002 (17) −0.0065 (2) −0.0035 (3)
O1 0.0509 (8) 0.0526 (8) 0.0689 (10) −0.0042 (7) −0.0065 (8) 0.0180 (7)
N1 0.0451 (8) 0.0484 (9) 0.0403 (7) 0.0028 (7) −0.0043 (7) 0.0008 (7)
C4 0.0413 (10) 0.0403 (9) 0.0338 (9) −0.0082 (7) 0.0010 (7) 0.0035 (8)
C5 0.0524 (12) 0.0537 (12) 0.0317 (9) −0.0072 (9) 0.0002 (8) −0.0023 (8)
C6 0.0592 (13) 0.0510 (12) 0.0400 (10) −0.0036 (9) 0.0120 (9) −0.0060 (9)
C7 0.0433 (10) 0.0437 (10) 0.0500 (9) −0.0024 (8) 0.0106 (8) 0.0003 (8)
O2 0.0587 (9) 0.0613 (10) 0.0969 (13) 0.0069 (8) −0.0212 (9) 0.0000 (9)
C2 0.0446 (9) 0.0380 (9) 0.0555 (14) −0.0031 (7) 0.0037 (8) −0.0050 (8)
C1 0.0518 (12) 0.0673 (15) 0.0558 (12) 0.0036 (11) −0.0106 (9) 0.0090 (10)
C8 0.0484 (11) 0.0469 (12) 0.0705 (13) 0.0010 (10) 0.0064 (12) 0.0012 (10)
C3 0.0494 (11) 0.0427 (10) 0.0550 (12) 0.0026 (9) 0.0057 (9) −0.0005 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

S1—C4 1.7398 (18) C7—C8 1.411 (3)
S1—C7 1.751 (2) O2—C8 1.237 (3)
O1—C3 1.414 (3) C2—C3 1.509 (3)
O1—H1 0.8200 C2—H2A 0.9700
N1—C4 1.342 (3) C2—H2B 0.9700
N1—C2 1.453 (2) C1—H1A 0.9600
N1—C1 1.454 (3) C1—H1B 0.9600
C4—C5 1.404 (3) C1—H1C 0.9600
C5—C6 1.384 (3) C8—H8 0.9300
C5—H5 0.9300 C3—H3A 0.9700
C6—C7 1.371 (3) C3—H3B 0.9700
C6—H6 0.9300
C4—S1—C7 91.21 (10) C3—C2—H2A 108.9
C3—O1—H1 109.5 N1—C2—H2B 108.9
C4—N1—C2 122.26 (16) C3—C2—H2B 108.9
C4—N1—C1 119.38 (17) H2A—C2—H2B 107.7
C2—N1—C1 118.15 (17) N1—C1—H1A 109.5
N1—C4—C5 127.17 (17) N1—C1—H1B 109.5
N1—C4—S1 121.74 (14) H1A—C1—H1B 109.5
C5—C4—S1 111.08 (15) N1—C1—H1C 109.5
C6—C5—C4 112.17 (18) H1A—C1—H1C 109.5
C6—C5—H5 123.9 H1B—C1—H1C 109.5
C4—C5—H5 123.9 O2—C8—C7 125.7 (2)
C7—C6—C5 114.99 (18) O2—C8—H8 117.1
C7—C6—H6 122.5 C7—C8—H8 117.1
C5—C6—H6 122.5 O1—C3—C2 110.98 (15)
C6—C7—C8 128.45 (19) O1—C3—H3A 109.4
C6—C7—S1 110.53 (15) C2—C3—H3A 109.4
C8—C7—S1 120.99 (17) O1—C3—H3B 109.4
N1—C2—C3 113.27 (16) C2—C3—H3B 109.4
N1—C2—H2A 108.9 H3A—C3—H3B 108.0
C2—N1—C4—C5 174.75 (18) C5—C6—C7—C8 177.8 (2)
C1—N1—C4—C5 0.2 (3) C5—C6—C7—S1 −0.2 (2)
C2—N1—C4—S1 −6.4 (2) C4—S1—C7—C6 0.14 (15)
C1—N1—C4—S1 179.03 (15) C4—S1—C7—C8 −178.05 (16)
C7—S1—C4—N1 −179.10 (15) C4—N1—C2—C3 −103.3 (2)
C7—S1—C4—C5 −0.06 (15) C1—N1—C2—C3 71.4 (2)
N1—C4—C5—C6 178.94 (18) C6—C7—C8—O2 −177.4 (2)
S1—C4—C5—C6 0.0 (2) S1—C7—C8—O2 0.5 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7 0.1 (2) N1—C2—C3—O1 60.7 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1···O2i 0.82 1.93 2.751 (2) 174

Symmetry code: (i) x−1/2, −y, z.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this paper is available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: XU5786).

References

  1. Bruker (2007). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Encinas, S. (2002). Chem. Eur. J. 8, 137–150.
  3. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  4. Perašínová, L., Štefko, M., Végh, D. & Kožíšek, J. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o3972–o3973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, Global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814012021/xu5786sup1.cif

e-70-0o724-sup1.cif (15.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814012021/xu5786Isup2.hkl

e-70-0o724-Isup2.hkl (77.2KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814012021/xu5786Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 996513

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES