Skip to main content
The Scientific World Journal logoLink to The Scientific World Journal
. 2014 May 12;2014:503624. doi: 10.1155/2014/503624

Flow Characteristics of the Raw Sewage for the Design of Sewage-Source Heat Pump Systems

Ying Xu 1,*, Yuebin Wu 2,3, Qiang Sun 2
PMCID: PMC4053585  PMID: 24987735

Abstract

The flow characteristics of raw sewage directly affect the technical and economic performance of sewage-source heat pump systems. The purpose of this research is to characterize the flow characteristics of sewage by experimental means. A sophisticated and flexible experimental apparatus was designed and constructed. Then the flow characteristics of the raw sewage were studied through laboratorial testing and theoretical analyses. Results indicated that raw sewage could be characterized as a power-law fluid with the rheological exponent n being 0.891 and the rheological coefficient k being 0.00175. In addition, the frictional loss factor formula in laminar flow for raw sewage was deduced by theoretical analysis of the power-law fluid. Furthermore, an explicit empirical formula for the frictional loss factor in turbulent flow was obtained through curve fitting of the experimental data. Finally, the equivalent viscosity of the raw sewage is defined in order to calculate the Reynolds number in turbulent flow regions; it was found that sewage had two to three times the viscosity of water at the same temperature. These results contributed to appropriate parameters of fluid properties when designing and operating sewage-source heat pump systems.

1. Introduction

In China, coal is most commonly used as the main heat source in municipal heating systems. In addition, energy consumption for heating accounts for 13% of annual total energy consumption [1]. As heating systems using coal lead to environmental pollution, nonrenewable energy consumption, and greenhouse gas production, in order to achieve sustainable energy development and improve environment quality, sewage-source heat pump systems are now considered a feasible and sustainable alternative to conventional cooling and heating systems which also have a positive impact on environmental quality.

Sewage-source heat pump systems can be operated at a high coefficient of performance (COP) without releasing air pollution when properly designed and installed. They are also currently in operation in many countries. For example, in a residential area of Korea, a heat pump system using waste water from local saunas, public baths, and buildings has been effectively utilized not only for water heating but also for heating and cooling [2]. At the beginning of 2004, the first application in China of a sewage-source heat pump system for heating and cooling occurred at Miyun wastewater treatment plant in Beijing [3]. In Japan, a simulation study showed that sewage-source heat pumps could reduce energy consumption by 34%, lower the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) by 68%, and control the generation of nitrogen oxides (NOx) by 75% compared with conventional air-source heat pumps [4].

Sewage-source heat pumps could employ either raw sewage or treated sewage as the heat source. Typically, sewage-source heat pump systems have been placed after the wastewater treatment plant, utilizing the treated outflow water from the plant as the heat source. However, sewage-source heat pump systems could also use untreated water. The advantage of this is that the placement of these heat pump systems would not be restricted to the locations of wastewater treatment plants; rather, they could be distributed throughout an urban region. Despite these advantages, the design of such untreated sewage-source heat pump systems is made difficult as little is known regarding the fluid properties of untreated sewage. In particular, knowledge regarding raw sewage viscosity and shear-strain relationship and frictional loss factor during turbulent flow is required to appropriately design such systems, as they directly affect the technical and economic performance of the system.

Raw sewage is a kind of two-phase fluid with both solid and liquid phases. The solid is composed of various components, for example, the plastic. In general, raw sewage if used as a heat source in a heat pump system would need to be filtered. After filtration by grids with pore size being 3 mm it may be regarded as a kind of single-phase fluid [5]. The flow characteristics of the heat source directly affect the technical and economic performance of heat pump systems. Therefore, the study on flow characteristics of the raw sewage is of a considerable significance to the design and operation of sewage-source heat pump systems.

The purpose of the paper is to identify the rheological parameters and the constitutive equation of raw sewage by the use of laboratorial testing and theoretical analyses. Then the expressions of frictional loss factor in laminar flow and turbulent flow are determined, respectively, and frictional head losses of the raw sewage flowing in pipelines can be calculated conveniently.

2. Experimental System

2.1. Design of the Horizontal-Pipe Rheometer

The measurement of rheological parameters is the process of applying a shear stress on a fluid specimen and tracing the relationship between shear strain and time under certain conditions. In order to parameterize the shear-strain constitutive relationship equation, as shown in (1) [6]

τ=f(γ˙) (1)

in which τ is shear stress, Pa, and γ˙ is shear strain velocity, 1/s.

Rotary rheometers are widely used for rheological measurement for convenience. However, in the reference [7] it was found that rotary rheometers had some disadvantages in precision. In this study, a horizontal-pipe rheometer is used and its theoretical principle is the Hagen-Poiseuille equation [8], being

Q=πR4ΔP8μL (2)

in which Q is flow rate, m3/s; R is pipe radius, m; ΔP is pressure drop along the pipe, Pa; μ is dynamic viscosity, Pa · s; L is pipe length, m.

By substituting the Robinowitsch-Mooney equation [9] into (2), the following relationship can be found as

ΔPD4L=k(8vD)n (3)

in which D is diameter of horizontal pipe rheometer, m; v is average velocity at cross section, m/s; k′ is rheological coefficient of fluid, k′ = μ for the Newtonian fluid; n′ is rheological exponent of fluid, n′ = 1 for the Newtonian fluid.

Giving the experimental pipe diameter and length, the pressure drop along the pipe, ΔP, and the flow rate, Q, could be measured. Given the flow rate at a cross section, the average velocity at cross section could be calculated. As a result, the rheological coefficient, k′, and rheological exponent, n′, could be obtained through the use of curve fitting.

2.2. Apparatus of Experiments

The sketch and the picture of the horizontal-pipe rheometer are shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b), respectively. In order to maintain continuous sewage flow within the rheometer, the experimental system is established in an operating sewage treatment plant, making use of the sewage pool and grids of the treatment plant. The pore size of the grids was 3 mm. Besides the sewage pool and grids, the experimental system consisted of a sewage immersion pump, a segment of connecting steel pipe, a pressure stabilized tank with an overflow pipe, a segment of experimental steel pipe, a globe valve, and a piezometer connected at pressure tapping; also clapboard was used in order to maintain a steady flow in the rheometer.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sketch of the laboratorial system.

The rated flow and head of the sewage immersion pump were 25 m3/h and 15 m, respectively. The filtrated sewage from the grids was pumped from the sewage pool to the pressure stabilized tank through a steel pipe with diameter of 50 mm. The pressure stabilized tank had dimensions of 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 m3. The internal diameter and the length of the rheometer pipe were 10 mm and 6.5 m, respectively. The distance from the upstream pressure tapping to the pressure stabilized tank was 1.2 m in order to take into account the entrance effect, which occurs within a distance of 100 to 120 times of the rheometer's diameter [10]. The distance between the two pressure tappings was 5 m. The pressure drop ΔP was measured by the piezometer. The flow rate, Q, was measured using the volumetric method. Different flow rates were obtained by changing the opening of globe valve.

2.3. Calibration of the Horizontal-Pipe Diameter

The diameter of the horizontal pipe was preciously determined in order to calibrate the rheometer. The calibration experiments were performed in laminar flow by the use of a liquid of known viscosity based on the Darcy-Weisbach formula [11] shown as (4). The frictional loss factor under laminar flow conditions satisfies (5) [11]. Therefore, the calibrated diameter can be expressed by (6). Consider the following:

hf=λLDv22g, (4)
λ=64Re, (5)
D4=128υLQπ·g·hf (6)

in which h f is frictional loss, mH2O; λ is frictional loss factor; Re is Reynolds number; g is gravitational acceleration, m/s2; υ is kinematic viscosity, m2/s.

In the study, the calibration of the pipe diameter was performed using the tap water. The results show that the diameter of the experimental pipe was 10.4 mm.

3. Identification of Rheological Parameters

After calibrating the horizontal-pipe rheometer, the experimental system was tested at twenty different openings of the valve in order to measure the system response under twenty separate flow conditions.

Figure 2 shows that the fitting curve is linear and does not pass through the origin. Therefore, it can be concluded that the raw sewage exhibits the characteristics of a power-law fluid [12]. The fitting curve also indicates that the rheological coefficient k′ was 0.00196 and the rheological exponent n′ was 0.891.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fitting curve of experimental results.

A power-law fluid satisfies the following formula [13]

τ=k(γ)n (7)

in which n is rheological exponent of power-law fluid, n = n′, k is rheological coefficient of power-law fluid, k = k′/((1+3n)/4n)n.

Thus the constitutive equation of the raw sewage could be expressed as follows:

τ=0.00175(γ)0.891. (8)

An error analysis of the experimental data was carried out. In the experiments the measurement errors of D, L, ΔP, and Q contribute to the synthetic errors and result in the errors of rheological parameters n and k. From analyses to the experimental data, the relative synthetic error for each group of data was calculated to be no more than 3%.

4. The Frictional Loss Factor Formulas

The Reynolds number is the basis of flow characteristic analysis; for a power-law fluid the equation is different from the Newtonian fluid, being [14]

Re=ρDnv2nk8n1 (9)

in which Re′ is Reynolds number of the power-law fluid and ρ′ is the density of the power-law fluid, kg/m3.

Therefore, by substituting the experimentally determined values of n = 0.891 and k = 0.00175 into (9), the Reynolds number of the raw sewage can be determined as

Res=ρsD0.891v1.1090.001395 (10)

in which Res is Reynolds number of the raw sewage and ρ s is density of the raw sewage, kg/m3.

4.1. Formula under Laminar Flow Conditions

When a power-law fluid is in laminar flow, the frictional loss factor satisfies the following equation [14]:

λl=64Re (11)

in which λ l is frictional loss factor of power-law fluid under laminar flow conditions. Therefore, by substituting (10) into (11) the frictional loss factor of raw sewage in laminar flow satisfies

λls=0.0893ρsD0.891v1.109 (12)

in which λ ls is frictional loss factor of the raw sewage in laminar flow.

4.2. Empirical Formula under Turbulent Flow Conditions

The same experimental system as in Figure 1 was used to determine the frictional loss factor under hydraulic smooth region. The frictional loss and the flow rate were measured and twenty groups of data were obtained at different flow rates. Assuming that the density of the raw sewage is 1000 kg/m3, the frictional loss factor and Reynolds number were calculated according to (4) and (10). The fitting curve is shown in Figure 3 and the empirical formula for the frictional loss factor was found to be

λts=0.3208(Res)0.27 (13)

in which λ ts is frictional loss factor of the raw sewage in turbulent flow.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fitting curve of Res and λ ts.

The frictional loss factor for a power-law fluid in the hydraulic smooth region under turbulent flow conditions could also be calculated by the Karman formula [15] as follows:

1λK/4=4(n)0.75lg{Re(λK4)[1(n/2)]}0.4(n)1.2 (14)

in which λ K is frictional loss factor of Karman formula in turbulent flow.

Thus, the Karman formula for raw sewage (n = 0.891) could be expressed as

1λK/4=4.362·lg{Res·(λK4)0.555}0.459. (15)

Comparison between the frictional loss factors calculated by the empirical formula (13) and the Karman formula (15) is shown in Table 1 for the raw sewage in the hydraulic smooth region of turbulent flow.

Table 1.

Comparison of λ ts and λK.

Res λ ts λK Differences
2991.3548 0.03788 0.04093 0.0744
3510.366 0.03630 0.03894 0.0678
5196.7925 0.03269 0.03458 0.0547
7279.2964 0.02988 0.03138 0.0479
8742.9997 0.02845 0.02981 0.0456
10645.961 0.02699 0.02824 0.0442
12646.107 0.02578 0.02698 0.0445
14729.198 0.02475 0.02591 0.0447
16838.074 0.02388 0.02503 0.0458
18992.198 0.02313 0.02428 0.0475
20787.17 0.02258 0.02372 0.0482
23585.573 0.02183 0.022996 0.0508
26976.342 0.02106 0.02224 0.0531
30773.603 0.02033 0.02155 0.0566
34125.68 0.01978 0.02101 0.0587
36318.57 0.01945 0.02071 0.0608
43105.47 0.01858 0.01989 0.0659
50137.31 0.01785 0.01921 0.0708
58836.33 0.01710 0.01852 0.0767
67352.30 0.01649 0.01797 0.0824

Note: λ ts: frictional loss factor of the raw sewage in turbulent flow; λ K: frictional loss factor of Karman formula in turbulent flow.

The results in Table 1 indicate that the differences between λ ts and λ K are no more than 10%. Therefore, the presented empirical formula is in good confidence in its capacity to calculate frictional loss factors of the raw sewage in the hydraulic smooth region under turbulent flow conditions.

4.3. Equivalent Viscosity

In this study, the equivalent viscosity is defined, by which the Reynolds number of a non-Newtonian fluid is calculated from the Reynolds number expression of a Newtonian fluid under the same turbulent flow conditions. In this way, the Reynolds number of raw sewage in turbulent flow could be expressed as

Res=ρsvdμe (16)

in which μ e is equivalent viscosity of the raw sewage, Pa · s.

The relationship for μ e could be obtained by equaling the frictional loss for water with that for raw sewage, as previously determined in this paper.

The frictional loss factor of water can be calculated by Blasius equation [16] as follows:

λw=0.3164Rew0.25 (17)

in which λ w is frictional loss factor of water and Rew is Reynolds number of water.

Assuming that the frictional loss factor of water λ w in (17) is equal to that of the raw sewage λ ts in (13), the relationship between Reynolds number of the raw sewage Res and Reynolds number of water Rew satisfies the following equation:

Res0.27Rew0.25=1.0139. (18)

In engineering practice of sewage-source heat pump systems, the sewage is generally in the turbulent flow and the density ρ s is regarded as 1000 kg/m3, the same as the water density. With the same diameter and flow rate, the ratio of the equivalent viscosity μ e to the water viscosity can be found as

μeμw=2~3 (19)

in which μ w is viscosity of water, Pa · s.

The results of (19) are detailed in Table 2. Therefore, the equivalent viscosity of the raw sewage is two to three times the viscosity of water at the same temperature. It facilitates the Reynolds number calculation for the raw sewage in engineering practice.

Table 2.

Ratio of the equivalent viscosity to the water viscosity.

λ ts Re s Re w μ e/μ w
0.03788 2991.3548 4865.783 1.627
0.03630 3510.366 5772.476 1.644
0.03269 5196.7925 8776.698 1.689
0.02988 7279.2964 12578.743 1.728
0.02845 8742.9997 15297.454 1.750
0.02699 10645.961 18878.141 1.773
0.02578 12646.107 22689.018 1.794
0.02475 14729.198 26701.832 1.813
0.02388 16838.074 30803.925 1.829
0.02313 18992.198 35030.321 1.844
0.02258 20787.17 38577.246 1.856
0.02183 23585.573 44148.115 1.872
0.02106 26976.342 50958.388 1.889
0.02033 30773.603 58654.352 1.906
0.01978 34125.68 65502.310 1.919
0.01945 36318.57 70007.290 1.928
0.01858 43105.47 84063.285 1.950
0.01785 50137.31 98786.534 1.970
0.01710 58836.33 117194.504 1.992
0.01649 67352.30 135396.103 2.010
0.01484 100000 206502.717 2.065
0.009658 500000 1151929.060 2.304
0.008026 1000000 2415048.015 2.415
0.004340 10000000 28243971.830 2.824

5. Conclusions

A sophisticated and flexible experimental apparatus for investigating flow characteristics of raw sewage has been designed and constructed. The rheological parameters and constitutive equation of the raw sewage were determined through laboratorial testing and theoretical analyses, thereby deriving empirical and theoretical frictional loss factor formulas for raw sewage. Consequently, the following conclusions have been drawn.

(1) Raw sewage displays the characteristics of a power-law fluid with rheological exponent, n, being 0.891 and the rheological coefficient, k, being 0.00175. The constitutive equation is τ=0.00175(γ)0.891.

(2) The frictional loss factor formula in laminar flow for raw sewage was deduced by theoretical analysis of a power-law fluid and is given by λ ls = 0.0893/(ρ s D 0.891 v 1.109).

(3) By curve fitting of the experimental data, an empirical formula of the frictional loss factor in turbulent flow for raw sewage was determined as λ ts = 0.3208/(Res)0.27. The explicit expression distinguishes itself in simplicity and convenience in comparison with the Karman formula.

(4) The equivalent viscosity of raw sewage was defined, thereby introducing a convenient method for calculating the frictional loss factor of turbulent flow. The ratio of the equivalent viscosity of sewage ranged from two to three times that of water at the same temperature.

The study results contribute to the engineering design and operation of the sewage-source heat pump systems.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Fund in China (no. 51208160) and Natural Science Fund in Heilongjiang Province (no. QC2012C056).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Chen H-B, Shao Z-Y, Li D-Y. Study on the application of waste water-resource heat pump technology to residential buildings in Beijing. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (New Series) 2007;14(5):356–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baek NC. Study on the heat pump system using waste water as a heat source. Energy R&D. 1994;16(1):56–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jun Z. Investigate of sewage air-conditioning system in Miyun. Beijing Daily, August 2004.
  • 4.Baek NC, Shin UC, Yoon JH. A study on the design and analysis of a heat pump heating system using wastewater as a heat source. Solar Energy. 2005;78(3):427–440. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ronghua W. The engineering utilization and research on the untreated sewage-source heat pump system [Ph.D. thesis] Harbin, China: Harbin Institute of Technology; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tropea C, Yarin AL, Foss JF. Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weijia Z, Yiqun W, Zhongyi H. On the measuring precision of the constitutive parameters of power-law non-Newtonian fluid. Acta Metrologica Sinica. 1994;15(2):132–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sutera SP, Skalak R. The history of Poiseuille’s law. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 1993;25(1):1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Astarita G, Marrucci G. Principles of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moreno Quibén J, Thome JR. Flow pattern based two-phase frictional pressure drop model for horizontal tubes, Part II: New phenomenological model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2007;28(5):1060–1072. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bansal RK. A Textbook of Fluid Mechanics. Firewall Media; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pinho FT, Whitelaw JH. Flow of non-newtonian fluids in a pipe. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 1990;34(2):129–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chhabra RP, Richardson JF. Non-Newtonian Flow and Applied Rheology. 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Helton JC, Johnson JD, Sallaberry CJ, Storlie CB. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2006;91(10-11):1175–1209. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.White A. Drag Reduction by Additives Review and Bibliography. Cranfield, UK: Bhra Fluid Engineering; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mulley R. Flow of Industrial Fluids: Theory and Equations. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Scientific World Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES