Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2014 Jun;80(12):3741–3748. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00395-14

Production of Proteasome Inhibitor Syringolin A by the Endophyte Rhizobium sp. Strain AP16

Alexey Dudnik a,, Laurent Bigler b, Robert Dudler a
Editor: C R Lovell
PMCID: PMC4054136  PMID: 24727275

Abstract

Syringolin A, the product of a mixed nonribosomal peptide synthetase/polyketide synthase encoded by the syl gene cluster, is a virulence factor secreted by certain Pseudomonas syringae strains. Together with the glidobactins produced by a number of beta- and gammaproteobacterial human and animal pathogens, it belongs to the syrbactins, a structurally novel class of proteasome inhibitors. In plants, proteasome inhibition by syringolin A-producing P. syringae strains leads to the suppression of host defense pathways requiring proteasome activity, such as the ones mediated by salicylic acid and jasmonic acid. Here we report the discovery of a syl-like gene cluster with some unusual features in the alphaproteobacterial endophyte Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 that encodes a putative syringolin A-like synthetase whose components share 55% to 65% sequence identity (72% to 79% similarity) at the amino acid level. As revealed by average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculations, this strain likely belongs to the same species as biocontrol strain R. rhizogenes K84 (formely known as Agrobacterium radiobacter K84), which, however, carries a nonfunctional deletion remnant of the syl-like gene cluster. Here we present a functional analysis of the syl-like gene cluster of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 and demonstrate that this endophyte synthesizes syringolin A and some related minor variants, suggesting that proteasome inhibition by syrbactin production can be important not only for pathogens but also for endophytic bacteria in the interaction with their hosts.

INTRODUCTION

Syringolin A was originally isolated from culture supernatants of the phytopathogenic gammaproteobacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B301D-R based on its ability to elicit defense responses and pathogen resistance in rice plants (1, 2). It is a tripeptide derivative consisting an N-terminal valine and the two nonproteinogenic amino acids, 3,4-dehydrolysine and 5-methyl-4-amino-2-hexenoic acid; the first is N-acylated with an unusual ureido-valine moiety, and the latter two form a 12-member macrolactam ring (Fig. 1A). Syringolin A is the major variant of a family of related compounds in which one or both valine residues can be replaced by isoleucine and/or 3,4-dehydrolysine can be replaced by lysine (3). Syringolin A was shown to be a virulence factor in the interaction of P. syringae strain B728a with its host plant Phaseolus vulgaris (bean) where loss of syringolin A production resulted in a significantly diminished lesion number (4). The elucidation of the mode of action of syringolin A revealed that it irreversibly inhibited all three proteolytic activities (i.e., the caspase-, trypsin-, and chymotrypsin-like activities) of the eukaryotic proteasome by covalent ether bond formation with the active-site N-terminal threonine residues of the catalytic β1, β2, and β5 subunits of the 20S core proteasome (4). Proteasome inhibition suppresses the action of many plant hormones, including defense reactions mediated by the important defense hormones jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) (57).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(A) Structure of syringolin biosynthesis gene clusters from P. syringae pv. syringae B301D-R and Rhizobium sp. strain AP16. Homologous open reading frames (ORFs) are shown in black, while ORFs that are unique to one of the gene clusters are depicted in gray. Gene names are positioned atop the corresponding ORFs. (B) Chemical structure of syringolin variants. The core structure is given on the left and the modifications present in all accounted variants are listed on the right. (C) Expression of selected genes from the PMI03_05096–05102 gene cluster on SRMAFY agar at 18°C as detected by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR). The following genes were assayed: (lane 1) PMI03_05096, (lane 2) PMI03_05097, (lane 3) PMI03_05099, (lane 4) PMI03_05097-05099 intergenic (the label “intergenic” indicates instances in which primers originated in two adjacent genes, thus covering the corresponding intergenic region), (lane 5) PMI03_05100, (lane 6) PMI03_05100-5101 intergenic, (lane 7) PMI03_05102, and (lane 8) no-RT control.

Syringolin A is structurally similar to glidobactin A and related variants (syn. cepafungins) that were isolated more than 20 years ago from the betaproteobacterial strain K481-B101 (ATCC 53080; DSM 7029; formerly misidentified as Polyangium brachysporum) and an undefined species related to Burholderia cepacia due to their antifungal and antitumor activities (811). Similar to syringolin A, glidobactin A consists of a 12-member ring structure and inhibits the eukaryotic proteasome by the same mechanism as syringolin A (4). In glidobactins, the ureido-valyl moiety is replaced by a fatty acid tail. Together, syringolin A and glidobactin A are the founding members of a novel class of proteasome inhibitors named syrbactins (12).

Syringolin A and its variants are synthesized by a mixed nonribosomal peptide synthetase/polyketide synthetase (NRPS/PKS) encoded by a gene cluster comprising the five open reading frames (ORFs) sylA to sylE (Fig. 1B) (13). Whereas sylA encodes a LuxR-type transcriptional activator of the sylB gene and the sylCDE operon (14), sylE encodes a putative export facilitator involved in syringolin secretion. The sylC and sylD genes encode the NRPS/PKS responsible for syringolin biosynthesis, whereas sylB encodes a desaturase thought to mediate the conversion of lysine to 3,4-dehydrolysine in the ring structure. Based on the sequence and architecture of the syl gene cluster, an experimentally supported biosynthesis model of syringolin A was proposed which explains all structural features of the molecule (13, 1518). The syringolin variants are the result of incomplete lysine desaturation by SylB and a relaxed specificity of the SylC NRPS module, which, in addition to valine, activates also isoleucine, although with reduced efficiency (3, 15). Cloning of the glidobactin A synthetase revealed a gene cluster (glb genes) with high similarity in sequence and architecture to the syl gene cluster, allowing the postulation of a biosynthesis model analogous to the one for the syringolin variants (19).

A search in genome sequence databases revealed intact syl gene clusters in the majority of sequenced strains belonging to phylogenetic group II of the P. syringae species complex (2022), whereas, in addition to strain K481-B101, intact glb-like gene clusters were identified in the human pathogens Burkholderia pseudomallei, B. oklahomensis (betaproteobacteria), and Photorhabdus asymbiotica (gammaproteobacteria), as well as in the insect pathogen and nematode symbiont Ph. luminescens (18, 19). Thus, these strains seem capable of synthesizing syrbactin-class proteasome inhibitors, and this was indeed shown for the genus Photorhabdus, which, in addition to glidobactin A (23, 24), also synthesizes the minor variant cepafungin I, the strongest proteasome inhibitor hitherto known (25).

Among recently deposited genome sequences we have discovered a syl-like gene cluster with unusual features in the genome of the alphaproteobacterial strain Rhizobium sp. strain AP16, which was isolated from the root endosphere of poplar trees (Populus deltoides [Eastern cottonwood]) (26). Here we present a functional analysis of this gene cluster and show that this endophyte synthesizes the proteasome inhibitor syringolin A under laboratory conditions in a medium which contains plant-borne phenolic compounds. We also demonstrate that a type II thioestherase encoded immediately downstream of the sylB homolog is involved in enhancing syringolin A biosynthesis yield. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the SylC homolog in this strain contains a tandem peptidyl-carrier protein (PCP) domain and that deletion of the second of these domains has no influence on syringolin production. Finally, we investigated the phylogenetic position of AP16 and show that this strain is closely related to the biocontrol agent Rhizobium rhizogenes K84 (formerly Agrobacterium radiobacter K84), which, interestingly, retains only remnants of the syl-like gene cluster.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas syringae were routinely grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (tryptone at 10 g/liter, yeast extract at 5 g/liter, and NaCl at 5 g/liter). Rhizozbium sp. strain AP16 was cultivated in rhizobium medium (mannitol at 10 g/liter, K2HPO4 at 0.5 g/liter, MgSO4 at 0.2 g/liter, NaCL at 0.1 g/liter, and yeast extract at 1 g/liter) unless stated otherwise. For syringolin production, SRMAF medium (27) supplemented with 0.5 g/liter yeast extract was used. For solid media, 2% of agar was added. Antibiotics were used in the following concentrations: chloramphenicol at 20 μg/ml, gentamicin at 50 μg/ml, rifampin at 50 μg/ml, and tetracycline at 15 μg/ml.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Genotype, relevant characteristic(s)a Reference or source
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 Wild-type strain, Chlr 26
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16, ΔsylC Deletion mutant of PMI03_05100 This study
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16, Δ05097 Deletion mutant of PMI03_05097 This study
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16, Δ05096–05097 Double-deletion mutant of PMI03_05096 and PMI03_05097 This study
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16, ΔPCP1 Deletion mutant of PCP1 site of PMI03_05100 This study
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16, ΔPCP2 Deletion mutant of PCP2 site of PMI03_05100 This study
P. syringae pv. syringae B301D-R (pOEAC) Syringolin-producing strain; sylA overexpression/sylC promoter-reporter gene fusion; this strain overproduces syringolin A and its minor variants 14
E. coli XL-1 Blue endA1 gyrA96(Nalr) thi-1 recA1 relA1 lac glnV44 F′[::Tn10 proAB+ lacIq Δ(lacZ)M15] hsdR17(rK mK+) 51
E. coli S17-1 thi pro hsdR recA; chromosomal RP4 [Tra+ Tcs Kms Aps] 52
Plasmid
    pJQ200KSΔPlac Suicide vector; p15A ori; Gentr, SacB, Δlac promoter This study
a

Ap, ampicillin; Chl, chloramphenicol; Gent, gentamicin; Km, kanamycin; Nal, nalidixic acid; Tc, tetracycline.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis.

Total RNA was extracted from bacteria grown as a lawn on SRMAFY plates after 3 days in constant darkness using an RNeasy Protect Bacteria minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with on-column DNase treatment as described in the manufacturer's manual. Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using a Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described in the manufacturer's manual.

Generation of markerless in-frame gene deletion mutants.

Fragments (700 bp long) of upstream and downstream sequences surrounding the target gene were amplified using the respective primer pairs (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) (primers P1 and P2 to amplify the upstream sequence and primers P3 and P4 amplify the downstream sequence). The primers were designed such that 18 to 30 bases of the original gene sequence, including the start and the stop codons, would be retained in order to generate an in-frame deletion. The two DNA fragments were then joined by overlap extension PCR using primers P1 and P4. The PCR product obtained was digested with the respective restriction enzymes, cloned into suicide vector pJQ200KSΔPlac, and transformed into E. coli XL-1 Blue. After verification by sequencing, the resulting construct was transformed into E. coli S17-1 and further mobilized into Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 by biparental mating. Single recombinants were selected on plates containing gentamicin and, after verification by PCR, grown on plates with rhizobium medium supplemented with 10% sucrose in order to select double recombinants. Deletion of the target sequence was verified by PCR using the respective oriA and oriB primers and sequence determination.

Isolation of syringolin from bacterial cultures and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.

For P. syringae, liquid cultures (5 ml each) were grown overnight in LB medium supplemented with tetracycline at 28°C on a shaker (220 rpm/min). The density was adjusted to an OD600 of 0.2, and 4-ml aliquots were used to inoculate 400-ml SRMAF cultures into 1,000-ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Flasks were further incubated at 20°C for 10 days under conditions of constant shaking (220 rpm). Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 40 ml distilled water per flask. To isolate syringolin from Rhizobium sp. strain AP14, bacteria of 1.8-ml overnight cultures adjusted to an OD600 of 0.3 were collected, resuspended in 200 μl distilled water (dH2O), and plated out on SRMAFY plates that were incubated for 5 days at 18°C in constant darkness unless stated otherwise. In order to extract syringolin, cells were scraped off the plates and resuspended in 40 ml distilled water per plate.

Resuspended cells were incubated on a shaker at 200 rpm for 4 h. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation (3,200 × g, 10 min) and supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes supplemented with 2.5 g of Amberlite XAD-16 resin prepared according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland). Tubes were incubated on a rotator at 30 rpm for 2 h. Resin beads were then collected by centrifugation and washed three times in 40 ml dH2O for 20 min on a rotator at 30 rpm. Beads were collected by sedimentation and washed twice with 20 ml 20% methanol for 20 min. After sedimentation of the beads, the supernatant was discarded and syringolins were eluted with 900 μl of 70% isopropanol overnight at +4°C. Isopropanol was then removed, and the beads were washed with another 900 μl of 70% isopropanol for 20 min at room temperature with shaking (200 rpm). The two eluates were combined and filtered through a Millex GP filter unit (Millipore, Molsheim, France) (0.22 μm pore size), and 1 ml of the reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness using a Savant SpeedVac (Fisher Scientific Switzerland, Reinach, Switzerland). Dry material was resuspended in 300 μl dH2O, filtered again through a Millex GP filter unit, and stored at +4°C until further use.

HPLC analysis was performed as follows. A 20-μl volume of filtrate was injected into a 250-mm-by-4.6-mm Nucleosil 100 C18 5-μm-pore-size column (Dr. Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany) which was connected to an UltiMate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fisher, Olten, Switzerland). Isocratic separation of components was performed with 20% acetonitrile–0.06% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.

MS and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

Low-resolution electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra were measured with a quadrupole ion trap instrument (Esquire LC; Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). The solutions (about 0.1 to 1 μmol/ml in MeCN) were continuously introduced through the electrospray interface at a flow rate of 5 μl min−1. Mass spectrometry (MS) acquisitions were performed at normal resolution (0.6 U at half peak height) under ion charge control (ICC) conditions (10,000) in the mass range of m/z 100 to 2,000. To get representative mass spectra, 8 scans were averaged.

High-resolution (6,000) electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS) was performed on a Finnigan MAT 900 (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA) double-focusing magnetic sector mass spectrometer. The samples were dissolved in CH3OH (50 μM). PPG425 and PPG1000 (Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) served for calibration.

All 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature using a Bruker Avance 600 MHz instrument at 600 MHz (1H) and 151 MHz (13C). Samples (ca. 2 mg) were dissolved in d6-dimethyl sulfoxide (d6-DMSO). Spectra were calibrated with regard to the proton chemical shift (δ = 0 ppm) and carbon chemical shift (δ = 0 ppm) of tetramethylsilane.

Phylogenetic tree generation.

Nucleotide sequences of the following four housekeeping genes were extracted from NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank): DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrB-1), glyceraldehyde triphosphate dehydrogenase (gap), citrate synthase (gltA [cisY]), and RNA polymerase sigma factor 70 (rpoD [sigA]). Accession numbers of the included genomes are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material. Nucleotide sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm (28) and concatenated. Phylogenetic tree construction was done using MEGA 5.2.2 software (29) with the neighbor-joining method (Saitou-Nei algorithm) and 1,000 bootstrap cycles.

RESULTS

The syl-like gene cluster of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16.

BLAST searches in microbial genome databases at NCBI revealed the draft genome of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 (AP16) to contain a region (GenBank accession no. AJVM01000074) encompassing a gene cluster with high similarity in sequence and architecture to the syringolin A synthetase-encoding genes of P. syringae B301D-R and a number of other P. syringae strains (Fig. 1B) (13). The proteins encoded by PMI03_05099 to PMI03_5102 exhibit 55% to 65% sequence identity (72% to 79% similarity) to the products of the sylB to sylE genes that are responsible for biosynthesis and export of syringolin A in P. syringae strains. The AP16 gene cluster lacks a homolog of the sylA gene encoding a transcriptional activator which in P. syringae B301D-R controls expression of the sylB gene and the sylCDE operon. This suggests that transcriptional regulation is not conserved between the two species. In addition to these genes, the AP16 gene cluster contains three open reading frames (ORFs) (PMI03_05098, PMI03_05097, and PMI03_05096) on the bottom strand downstream of the sylB homolog PMI03_05099 which are not present in P. syringae syl gene clusters (Fig. 1B). The relatively close spacing of these ORFs (78 bp between PMI03_05099 and PMI03_05097; 69 bp between PMI03_05097 and PMI03_05096) may suggest that they are transcribed as an operon together with PMI03_05099, which would point to a function of these additional genes in the biosynthesis of the putative product controlled by the gene cluster. The annotation of PMI03_05098 appears doubtful as it is predicted to encode a short peptide of 35 amino acids with no similarity to known proteins and overlaps 25 nucleotides of PMI03_05097, which encodes a type II (stand-alone) thioesterase. Type II thioesterases are known to release stalled NRPS modules that have been loaded with a nonextendable moiety (30, 31). The third ORF, PMI03_05096, encodes a hypothetical protein of unknown function belonging to the 5-carboxymethyl-2-hydroxymuconate isomerase (CHMI) superfamily of proteins (cl01268). Certain members of this superfamily catalyze the isomerization of unsaturated ketones (32).

Because of the highly conserved domain structure and amino acid specificity as revealed by the “10-amino-acid codes” (33) of the corresponding adenylation domains in the AP16 SylC (PMI03_05100) and SylD (PMI03_05101) homologs, the AP16 gene cluster is predicted to control the biosynthesis of a syringolin A-like proteasome inhibitor. The closely spaced additional genes downstream of the sylB homolog PMI03_05099 and the unusual tandem thiolation domains in the SylC homolog PMI03_05100 might be involved in decoration and/or biosynthesis efficiency of the putative product.

Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 produces syringolin A and related variants.

We sought to detect transcripts corresponding to the syl-like gene cluster of the AP16 strain under various growth conditions. The strain grew reasonably well on plates with rhizobium medium both at 28°C and 18°C but hardly grew on LB plates. Best growth was obtained on SRMAF medium supplemented with 0.5 g/liter yeast extract (SRMAFY). RNA was extracted from bacteria collected from rhizobium medium or SRMAFY plates after incubation at 18°C or 28°C for 3 days in the dark and used as a template for RT-PCR using primers specific for the individual ORFs (PMI03_05096 through PMI03_05102, except PMI03_05098, which was not considered further). None of these genes was detectably expressed in bacteria grown on plates with either medium at 28°C. In contrast, growth on SRMAFY plates at 18°C revealed transcripts corresponding to PMI03_05097 to PMI03_05102, whereas PMI03_05096 transcripts were not detected (Fig. 1C). On rhizobium medium plates, transcripts were hardly detectable. Therefore, SRMAFY plates were used for all further experiments.Amplification by RT-PCR of the intergenic region between PMI03_05100 and PMI03_05101 was not successful (Fig. 1C), indicating that these genes, unlike their homologs in syringolin A-producing P. syringae strains, were not transcribed as an operon (14). Similarly, the intergenic region between PMI03_05097 and PMI03_05099 was also not detected in the extracted RNA.

To detect the putative product of the AP16 syl-like gene cluster, bacteria were grown as a lawn on SRMAFY plates at 18°C in the dark for 5 days, scraped off the plates, and subjected to our standard syringolin extraction and detection procedure (see Materials and Methods). Samples were subjected to HPLC analysis. For comparison of HPLC profiles, a PMI03_05100 (sylC homolog) in-frame deletion mutant was constructed (AP16_ΔSylC) and analyzed in parallel. As shown in Fig. 2, several peaks were detected in wild-type extracts that were absent in the AP16_ΔsylC mutant. Comparison with the HPLC profile of extracts from P. syringae B301D-R suggested that major peaks A and D in Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 extracts corresponded to syringolin A and syringolin D of B301D-R (3). Peak A from strain AP16 was collected and subjected to LC-HR-ESI-MS, which revealed a quasimolecular ion with an m/z of 494.29747, corresponding to the formula C24H40N5O6 (hydrogen adduct, m/z 494.29731; standard deviation [SD], 0.32 ppm), which is identical to syringolin A. The 1H and 13C NMR data of peak A were also essentially identical to those of syringolin A isolated from P. syringae B301D-R (Table S3 in the supplemental material). We conclude from these results that Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 synthesizes the proteasome inhibitor syringolin A under the culture conditions used. Interestingly, when AP16 was grown on plates in the light (16 h light/8 h dark), no syringolin A was detected (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Syringolin A was also not produced when AP16 was grown in liquid culture, irrespective of the light conditions.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Aligned HPLC profiles of syringolin-overproducing strain P. syringae pv. syringae (Psy) B301D-R (pOEAC), Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 wild type (WT), and a PMI03_05100 deletion mutant (ΔsylC).

ESI-MS of the second-largest AP16 peak, peak D, revealed a quasimolecular ion with an m/z of 508.2, which is identical to the hydrogen adduct of syringolin D, thus confirming the tentative identification given above. In syringolin D, ureido-valine is replaced by ureido-isoleucine (3). The comparison of the HPLC profiles showed that AP16 produced significantly less syringolin B, C, and E relative to syringolin A than was observed in P. syringae B301D-R (Table 2). In syringolin B, the 3,4-dehydrolysine moiety in the ring structure is replaced by lysine, which, according to the biosynthesis model, results from incomplete lysine desaturation by the sylB gene product, most likely before incorporation (13, 17). Thus, lysine desaturation seems considerably more efficient in strain AP16 than in P. syringae B301D-R. This explains also the reduced abundance of syringolin E in AP16, as this variant combines the saturated lysine with the ureido-isoleucine (Fig. 1A and Table 2). In addition, syringolin C, in which the valine attached to the ring structure is replaced by isoleucine, is less abundant in strain AP16 than in P. syringae B301D-R (Fig. 2 and Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Production of syringolin minor variants in relation to syringolin A

Strain Syringolin variant (avg relative peak area ± SD)a
A B C D E
P. syringae pv. syringae B301D-R 100 17.7 ± 2.0 30.2 ± 2.0 37.9 ± 2.4 9.2 ± 1.3
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 100 2.6 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.4 27.6 ± 2.0 0.5 ± 0.1
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 Δ05097 100 3.0 ± 1.0 6.3 ± 2.2 24.8 ± 1.8 1.1 ± 0.9
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 Δ05096–05097 100 2.7 ± 1.0 6.6 ± 1.3 27.4 ± 0.6 0.6 ± 0.3
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 ΔPCP2 100 1.5 ± 0.6 5.7 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.1
a

Data represent average relative peak area ± standard deviation derived from HPLC profiles (n = 3).

In order to test whether PMI03_05097 and/or PMI03_05096, which are located downstream of the sylB homolog PMI03_05099 on the same DNA strand (Fig. 1B), had a function in syringolin production, in particular, in the apparently more efficient desaturation of lysine to 3,4-dehydrolysine in strain AP16 compared to P. syringae B301D-R, in-frame mutants carrying in-frame deletions of PMI03_05097 (Δ05097) or both of PMI03_05096 and PMI03_05097 (Δ05096-05097) were constructed. Comparison of the HPLC profiles of these two mutants and that of the wild-type AP16 strain did not exhibit significant differences with regard to relative variant abundances (Fig. 3A and Table 2), thus suggesting that the presence of PMI03_05096 alone or in combination with PMI03_05097 did not cause the different variant abundances observed in P. syringae B301D-R and AP16. However, both mutants reproducibly produced reduced amounts of syringolin A: in mutants Δ05097 and Δ05096-05097, syringolin A levels reached 59% ± 0.4% (P = 0.002, Student's t test, n = 3) and 49% ± 11% (P = 0.004, Student's t test, n = 3) of the values observed in the wild-type AP16 strain, respectively, suggesting that the PMI03_05097 gene enhances the biosynthesis efficiency of syringolin.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

(A) HPLC profiles of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 wild type (WT), a deletion mutant of PMI03_05097 (Δ05097), and a double-deletion mutant of PMI03_05096 and PMI03_05097 (Δ05096-05097). (B) Alignment of the HPLC profiles of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 wild type (WT) with deletion mutants of thiolation domains 1 and 2 in PMI03_05100 ΔPCP1 and ΔPCP2, respectively. Note that in both cases, the chromatograms were drawn to scale; i.e., the peak sizes in the different graphs are directly comparable.

The AP16 SylC homolog PMI03_05100 exhibits tandem thiolation domains.

Another unusual feature of the syl-like gene cluster of strain AP16 is that the NRPS module encoded by PMI03_05100, the AP16 sylC homolog, contains two tandemly arranged thiolation domains (also known as peptide carrier proteins or PCPs). Tandem thiolation domains have been described as acyl carrier proteins (ACPs) in a number of PKS modules and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) synthetases, where they have been implicated in the enhancement of product formation (3437).

To determine whether the tandem thiolation domains had an influence on syringolin production, in-frame deletion mutants of PMI03_05100 were generated that lacked either the first (ΔPCP1) or the second (ΔPCP2) thiolation domain. HPLC analyses of the mutants and the wild type revealed that the ΔPCP2 mutant produced 107% ± 12% of the wild-type AP16 level (P = 0.43, Student's t test, n = 3), which does not represent a significant difference. Relative variant abundances in the ΔPCP2 mutant were also the same as in the wild type (Fig. 3B and Table 2) In contrast, syringolin biosynthesis was completely abolished in the ΔPCP1 mutant (Fig. 3B). Thus, a single PCP (PCP1) appears to have been sufficient for full syringolin A biosynthesis under the culture conditions used. The syringolin-negative phenotype of the ΔPCP1 mutant could be due to improper folding of this internal deletion protein, or it may indicate that PCP2 is unable to substitute for PCP1.

Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 is closely related to Rhizobium rhizogenes K84.

Rhizobium rhizogenes K84 (formerly Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 [38]) has been commercially used as a biocontrol agent against crown gall disease for decades (39). As visualized in the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 4, Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 is closely related to R. rhizogenes K84. In fact, direct comparison of the complete draft genome of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 (GenBank accession no. AJVM00000000; 96 contigs) with the complete genome sequence of R. rhizogenes K84 (GenBank accession no. CP000628 and CP000629 for chromosomes 1 and 2, respectively) using the average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/ani/) yielded an identity value of 98.5%, strongly suggesting that the two strains belong to the same species (40). This conclusion was corroborated by a comparison using the genome-to-genome distance calculator GGDC 2.0 program GBDP2_BLASTPLUS (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php [40, 41]), which assigned the two genomes to the same species with a probability of 98.97%.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Neighbor-joining tree illustrating the phylogenetic position of Rhizobium sp. strain AP16. The tree was constructed based on nucleotide sequences of four conserved housekeeping genes using the neighbor-joining method and 1,000 bootstraps. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide changes per site. Bootstrapping-based probabilities are displayed only at nodes where the values are different from 100.

Interestingly, R. rhizogenes K84 carries a deletion remnant of the syl gene cluster on chromosome 2 consisting of the sequence encoding the last 102 amino acids of the PMI03_05101 (sylD) homolog and the complete PMI03_05102 (sylE) homolog (annotated as YP_002541055 in R. rhizogenes K84) (7). The deletion encompasses the rest of the syl gene cluster and the part of the PMI03_05095 homolog encoding the N-terminal 43 amino acids.

DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated that the AP16 syl-like gene cluster indeed governs the biosynthesis of the proteasome inhibitor syringolin A and some related variants. In comparison to P. syringae B301D-R, AP16 produces approximately 7-fold less syringolin B and only vanishing amounts of syringolin E in relation to syringolin A. SylB, which is homologous to dihydrorhizobitoxin desaturase (42), is thought to be responsible for the desaturation of lysine to 3,4-dehydrolysine (13). This reaction probably occurs before incorporation into the peptide structure by the first NRPS module of SylD, because its activation domain adenylates 3,4-dehydrolysine much more quickly and more efficiently than lysine (17). The low abundance of syringolin B and E in AP16 shows that lysine is incorporated into the peptide at a much lower rate than in P. syringae B301D-R. This difference seems to be due to the intrinsic properties of the corresponding NRPS modules of the two species. The alternative hypothesis we initially entertained, namely, that the stand-alone thioesterase encoded by PMI03_05097 might lower the rate of incorporation of the nonpreferred lysine residue, had to be discarded because the deletion of PMI03_05097 had no influence on the variety ratios (Table 2).

Syringolin C and D are isomers differing in the substitution of the ring-proximal or the distal valine residue by isoleucine (Fig. 1A) (3). Whereas the abundance ratio of these two variants in P. syringae B301D-R is 0.8, it is 0.2 in AP16 (Table 2); i.e., syringolin C has 4-fold-lower abundance in the latter strain. P. syringae SylC was experimentally shown to be the NRPS starter module to activate valine and, to a lesser extent, isoleucine and to form an ureido-dipeptide, whereby the ureido carbonyl group is derived from hydrogen carbonate/carbon dioxide (15, 16). In contrast to P. syringae, in AP16, valine is much less likely to be substituted by isoleucine at the ring-proximal position than at the distal position. This appears to be an intrinsic property of the SylC homolog encoded by PMI03_05100 and is not due to the unusual tandem PCP domains, because the ΔPCP2 mutant and the wild type have very similar absolute variant abundances (Fig. 3B and Table 2). Thus, the second PCP in PMI03_05100 seems to be redundant for any aspect of syringolin biosynthesis under the experimental conditions used. Apart from the protein encoded by PMI03_05100, only one other NRPS module exhibiting tandem PCP domains was identified by a search through the NCBI RefSeq protein sequence database (GenBank accession no. WP_007460164 from Streptomyces sp. strain W007); that module, however, remains uncharacterized. As mentioned above, tandem thiolation domains (ACPs) have been described in some type I PKS modules as well as in polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) synthetases. In some cases, they have been demonstrated to improve product yield by working either serially or in parallel (3437).

AP16 has been isolated from the endosphere of poplar roots. Many bacteria have been found to maintain endophytic relationships with their host plants (4345). Plants have been shown to respond with local defense reactions to colonization by endophytes (43, 4648). Such colonization also results in elevated levels of SA. Compatible rhizobia produce specific nodulation (Nod) factors, which in turn suppress SA production, thus downregulating defense responses (49). Based on our analysis, the genome of AP16 lacks any known nod genes. In addition, despite the presence of a seemingly complete type III secretion system (NCBI accession AJVM01000009), we did not detect any known rhizobial or Pseudomonas type III effector proteins, which are normally involved in suppression of host immune responses (50). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that in AP16, syringolin A could potentially substitute for type III effectors or Nod factors with regard to host defense suppression during the colonization of poplar roots to at least some extent. This statement is, however, purely speculative, and further experiments are needed to clarify this point. This would involve establishing an infection model in Eastern cottonwood seedlings, the plant species from which the bacterium was originally isolated.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are indebted to Dale Pelletier, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, for providing Rhizobium sp. strain AP16. We also thank Zsuzsana Hasenkamp for her assistance with extraction of syringolin from bacteria.

This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation grant 31003A-134936 (to R.D).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 11 April 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00395-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wäspi U, Blanc D, Winkler T, Rüedi P, Dudler R. 1998. Syringolin, a novel peptide elicitor from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae that induces resistance to Pyricularia oryzae in rice. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 11:727–733. 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.8.727 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wäspi U, Schweizer P, Dudler R. 2001. Syringolin reprograms wheat to undergo hypersensitive cell death in a compatible interaction with powdery mildew. Plant Cell 13:153–161. 10.1105/tpc.13.1.153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wäspi U, Hassa P, Staempfli AA, Molleyres L-P, Winkler T, Dudler R. 1999. Identification and structure of a family of syringolin variants: unusual cyclic peptides from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae that elicit defense responses in rice. Microbiol. Res. 154:89–93. 10.1016/S0944-5013(99)80040-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Groll M, Schellenberg B, Bachmann AS, Archer CR, Huber R, Powell TK, Lindow S, Kaiser M, Dudler R. 2008. A plant pathogen virulence factor inhibits the eukaryotic proteasome by a novel mechanism. Nature 452:755–758. 10.1038/nature06782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schellenberg B, Ramel C, Dudler R. 2010. Pseudomonas syringae virulence factor syringolin A counteracts stomatal immunity by proteasome inhibition. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 23:1287–1293. 10.1094/MPMI-04-10-0094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Misas-Villamil JC, Kolodziejek I, Crabill E, Kaschani F, Niessen S, Shindo T, Kaiser M, Alfano JR, van der Hoorn RAL. 2013. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae uses proteasome inhibitor syringolin A to colonize from wound infection sites. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003281. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dudler R. 2013. Manipulation of host proteasomes as a virulence mechanism of plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 51:521–542. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oka M, Nishiyama Y, Ohta S, Kamei H, Konishi M, Miyaki T, Oki T, Kawaguchi H. 1988. Glidobactins A, B and C, new antitumor antibiotics. I. Production, isolation, chemical properties and biological activity. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 41:1331–1337. 10.7164/antibiotics.41.1331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oka M, Yaginuma K, Numata K, Konishi M, Oki T, Kawaguchi H. 1988. Glidobactins A, B and C, new antitumor antibiotics. II. Structure elucidation. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 41:1338–1350. 10.7164/antibiotics.41.1338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oka M, Ohkuma H, Kamei H, Konishi M, Oki T, Kawaguchi H. 1988. Glidobactins D, E, F, G and H; minor components of the antitumor antibiotic glidobactin. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 41:1906–1909. 10.7164/antibiotics.41.1906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shoji J, Hinoo H, Kato T, Hattori T, Hirooka K, Tawara K, Shiratori O, Terui Y. 1990. Isolation of cepafungins I, II and III from Pseudomonas species. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 43:783–787. 10.7164/antibiotics.43.783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Archer CR, Koomoa DL, Mitsunaga EM, Clerc J, Shimizu M, Kaiser M, Schellenberg B, Dudler R, Bachmann AS. 2010. Syrbactin class proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis and autophagy occurs in association with p53 accumulation and Akt/PKB activation in neuroblastoma. Biochem. Pharmacol. 80:170–178. 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Amrein H, Makart S, Granado J, Shakya R, Schneider-Pokorny J, Dudler R. 2004. Functional analysis of genes involved in the synthesis of syringolin A by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B301 D-R. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17:90–97. 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.1.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ramel C, Baechler N, Hildbrand M, Meyer M, Schädeli D, Dudler R. 2012. Regulation of biosynthesis of syringolin A, a Pseudomonas syringae virulence factor targeting the host proteasome. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25:1198–1208. 10.1094/MPMI-03-12-0070-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Imker HJ, Walsh CT, Wuest WM. 2009. SylC catalyzes ureido-bond formation during biosynthesis of the proteasome inhibitor syringolin A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131:18263–18265. 10.1021/ja909170u [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramel C, Tobler M, Meyer M, Bigler L, Ebert M-O, Schellenberg B, Dudler R. 2009. Biosynthesis of the proteasome inhibitor syringolin A: the ureido group joining two amino acids originates from bicarbonate. BMC Biochem. 10:26. 10.1186/1471-2091-10-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wuest WM, Krahn D, Kaiser M, Walsh CT. 2011. Enzymatic timing and tailoring of macrolactamization in syringolin biosynthesis. Org. Lett. 13:4518–4521. 10.1021/ol2016687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dudler R. 2014. The role of bacterial phytotoxins in inhibiting the eukaryotic proteasome. Trends Microbiol. 22:28–35. 10.1016/j.tim.2013.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schellenberg B, Bigler L, Dudler R. 2007. Identification of genes involved in the biosynthesis of the cytotoxic compound glidobactin from a soil bacterium. Environ. Microbiol. 9:1640–1650. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01278.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hwang MSH, Morgan RL, Sarkar SF, Wang PW, Guttman DS. 2005. Phylogenetic characterization of virulence and resistance phenotypes of Pseudomonas syringae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:5182–5191. 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5182-5191.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sarkar SF, Guttman DS. 2004. Evolution of the core genome of Pseudomonas syringae, a highly clonal, endemic plant pathogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1999–2012. 10.1128/AEM.70.4.1999-2012.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baltrus DA, Nishimura MT, Romanchuk A, Chang JH, Mukhtar MS, Cherkis K, Roach J, Grant SR, Jones CD, Dangl JL. 2011. Dynamic evolution of pathogenicity revealed by sequencing and comparative genomics of 19 Pseudomonas syringae isolates. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002132. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dudnik A, Bigler L, Dudler R. 2013. Heterologous expression of a Photorhabdus luminescens syrbactin-like gene cluster results in production of the potent proteasome inhibitor glidobactin A. Microbiol. Res. 168:73–76. 10.1016/j.micres.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Theodore CM, King JB, You J, Cichewicz RH. 2012. Production of cytotoxic glidobactins/luminmycins by Photorhabdus asymbiotica in liquid media and live crickets. J. Nat. Prod. 75:2007–2011. 10.1021/np300623x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stein ML, Beck P, Kaiser M, Dudler R, Becker CFW, Groll M. 2012. One-shot NMR analysis of microbial secretions identifies highly potent proteasome inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:18367–18371. 10.1073/pnas.1211423109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown SD, Utturkar SM, Klingeman DM, Johnson CM, Martin SL, Land ML, Lu T-YS, Schadt CW, Doktycz MJ, Pelletier DA. 2012. Twenty-one genome sequences from Pseudomonas species and 19 genome sequences from diverse bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere and endosphere of Populus deltoides. J. Bacteriol. 194:5991–5993. 10.1128/JB.01243-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mo YY, Gross DC. 1991. Plant signal molecules activate the syrB gene, which is required for syringomycin production by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. J. Bacteriol. 173:5784–5792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwarzer D, Mootz HD, Linne U, Marahiel MA. 2002. Regeneration of misprimed nonribosomal peptide synthetases by type II thioesterases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:14083–14088. 10.1073/pnas.212382199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yeh E, Kohli RM, Bruner SD, Walsh CT. 2004. Type II thioesterase restores activity of a NRPS module stalled with an aminoacyl-S-enzyme that cannot be elongated. ChemBioChem 5:1290–1293. 10.1002/cbic.200400077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Poelarends GJ, Veetil VP, Whitman CP. 2008. The chemical versatility of the beta-alpha-beta fold: catalytic promiscuity and divergent evolution in the tautomerase superfamily. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65:3606–3618. 10.1007/s00018-008-8285-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stachelhaus T, Mootz HD, Marahiel MA. 1999. The specificity-conferring code of adenylation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Chem. Biol. 6:493–505. 10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80082-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.El-Sayed AK, Hothersall J, Cooper SM, Stephens E, Simpson TJ, Thomas CM. 2003. Characterization of the mupirocin biosynthesis gene cluster from Pseudomonas fluorescens NCIMB 10586. Chem. Biol. 10:419–430. 10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00091-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gu L, Eisman EB, Dutta S, Franzmann TM, Walter S, Gerwick WH, Skiniotis G, Sherman DH. 2011. Tandem acyl carrier proteins in the curacin biosynthetic pathway promote consecutive multienzyme reactions with a synergistic effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50:2795–2798. 10.1002/anie.201005280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang H, Zirkle R, Metz JG, Braun L, Richter L, Van Lanen SG, Shen B. 2008. The role of tandem acyl carrier protein domains in polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130:6336–6337. 10.1021/ja801911t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rahman AS, Hothersall J, Crosby J, Simpson TJ, Thomas CM. 2005. Tandemly duplicated acyl carrier proteins, which increase polyketide antibiotic production, can apparently function either in parallel or in series. J. Biol. Chem. 280:6399–6408. 10.1074/jbc.M409814200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Velázquez E, Palomo JL, Rivas R, Guerra H, Peix A, Trujillo ME, García-Benavides P, Mateos PF, Wabiko H, Martínez-Molina E. 2010. Analysis of core genes supports the reclassification of strains Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens AKE10 into the species Rhizobium rhizogenes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33:247–251. 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farrand SK. 1990. Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84: a model biocontrol system, p 679–691 In Baker RR, Dunn PE. (ed), New directions in biological control. Alternatives for suppressing agricultural pests and diseases. Wiley-Liss Inc., New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:81–91. 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yasuta T, Okazaki S, Mitsui H, Yuhashi K, Ezura H, Minamisawa K. 2001. DNA sequence and mutational analysis of rhizobitoxine biosynthesis genes in Bradyrhizobium elkanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4999–5009. 10.1128/AEM.67.11.4999-5009.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T. 2011. Living inside plants: bacterial endophytes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14:435–443. 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosenblueth M, Martínez-Romero E. 2006. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19:827–837. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Monchy S, Schwender J, Miller L, Ferrieri R, Rogers A, Wu X, Zhu W, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J, Newman L. 2009. Poplar and its bacterial endophytes: coexistence and harmony. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 28:346–358. 10.1080/07352680903241204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bordiec S, Paquis S, Lacroix H, Dhondt S, Ait Barka E, Kauffmann S, Jeandet P, Mazeyrat-Gourbeyre F, Clément C, Baillieul F, Dorey S. 2011. Comparative analysis of defence responses induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN and the non-host bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi in grapevine cell suspensions. J. Exp. Bot. 62:595–603. 10.1093/jxb/erq291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Conn VM, Walker AR, Franco CMM. 2008. Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21:208–218. 10.1094/MPMI-21-2-0208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Miché L, Battistoni F, Gemmer S, Belghazi M, Reinhold-Hurek B. 2006. Upregulation of jasmonate-inducible defense proteins and differential colonization of roots of Oryza sativa cultivars with the endophyte Azoarcus sp. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19:502–511. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mabood F, Smith D. 2007. The role of salicylates in rhizobium-legume symbiosis and abiotic stresses in higher plants, p 151–162 In Hayat S, Ahmad A. (ed), Salicylic acid: a plant hormone. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jones JDG, Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329. 10.1038/nature05286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bullock WO, Fernandez JM, Short JM. 1987. XL1-Blue: a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strain with beta-galactosidase selection. Biotechniques 5:376–378 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Biotechnology (NY) 1:784–791. 10.1038/nbt1183-784 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES