Abstract
Nodular fasciitis is a benign proliferative lesion that is usually found in the soft tissue of the upper extremity and trunk in young to middle-aged persons. It has rarely been described in the breast. A 35-year-old woman had noticed a mass in her left breast. It was elastic-hard, 13 mm in size, and located mainly in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast. Mammography did not detect the mass. Ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic lesion with an irregular margin. Neither fine-needle aspiration cytology nor core needle biopsy established a definitive diagnosis. Excisional biopsy was therefore performed. Histologically, the excised tumor tissue results were consistent with a diagnosis of nodular fasciitis of the breast. We report a case of nodular fasciitis of the breast, a rare histological type of breast tumor.
1. Introduction
Nodular fasciitis is a benign proliferative lesion that is usually found in the soft tissue of the upper extremity and trunk in young to middle-aged persons. It has rarely been described in the breast. Clinically, the presentation of nodular fasciitis of the breast is similar to that of breast carcinoma. We present a rare case of nodular fasciitis of the breast.
2. Case Report
A 35-year-old woman visited a local clinic because of awareness of a mass in her breast. She underwent ultrasonography (US-) guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy twice. The diagnosis was a “benign” lesion at both times. Four months later she underwent US-guided core needle biopsy. Based on the pathological findings, a phyllodes tumor and a spindle cell carcinoma, among other entities, were included in the differential diagnosis, but there was no definitive diagnosis. She was referred to our hospital for further examination.
Physical examination demonstrated a well-defined, 13 mm hard mass located in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast. No axillary lymph node swelling was found. There was no history of trauma. Her past medical history and family history were negative for malignancy.
Mammography of the left breast showed a dense breast but no mass (Figure 1). US revealed a hypoechoic lesion with an irregular margin and no acoustic shadow (Figure 2). The mass extended from the anterior border of the mammary gland. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—T1-weighted image, fat suppression—showed enhancement of the lesion (Figure 3). The pathological diagnosis was like the above-mentioned; therefore, core needle biopsy was not performed at our hospital. If based on imaging findings, breast cancer could not be excluded. Excisional biopsy with adequate margins was performed. The tumor was found to be widely adherent to the pectoralis major fascia, so the pectoralis major muscle was partially resected as well.
Figure 1.

Mammography. The mass was not detected.
Figure 2.

Ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic lesion with an irregular margin and no acoustic shadow. The mass extended from the anterior border of the mammary gland.
Figure 3.

Magnetic resonance imaging (T1-weighted image, fat suppression) showed enhancement of the lesion.
Pathologically, the resected specimen, 45 × 12 mm, contained a whitish firm mass that measured 13 × 6 mm. Microscopically, there was spindle cell proliferation of varying cellularity with an irregular infiltrative margin. Many cellular areas showed the growth of short bundles of spindle-shaped cells in a storiform pattern. The tumor margin was unclear, and the tumor involved the pectoralis major muscle (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining shows the typical features of nodular fasciitis: (a) ×2 and (b) ×20.
Immunohistochemical staining for CD34, desmin, S-100, and keratin was negative. The cells were positive for actin and CD68, indicating a diagnosis of nodular fasciitis.
3. Discussion
Nodular fasciitis, which was first described by Konwaler et al., is a benign proliferation of myofibroblasts characterized by their common location in the subcutaneous tissues of the upper extremities and the head and neck. The most characteristic feature of nodular fasciitis is a single, rapidly growing mass. Nodular fasciitis in the breast has been rarely described, with only 21 such reports to our knowledge (Table 1) [1–9, 11–21]. The average age of the patients is 39 years (range 17–84 years). The average size of the lesion is 1.9 cm (range 0.5–5.5 cm). In almost all cases, mammography and US have shown a malignant pattern.
Table 1.
Reported cases of nodular fasciitis in the literature.
| Author | Year | Sex | Age | Size (cm) | Mammography | Ultrasonography | Treatmnet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baba et al. [1] | 1978 | Female | 59 | — | — | — | Excised |
| Fritsches and Muller [2] | 1983 | — | 36 | 3.0 | Unspecified | unspecified | Excised |
| Torngren et al. [3] | 1991 | Female | 52 | 1.5 | Unspecified | unspecified | Excised |
| Stanley et al. [4] | 1993 | — | — | 1.5 | Unspecified | unspecified | observed |
| Benson et al. [5] | 1994 | — | 44 | 1.5 | Unspecified | unspecified | Excised |
| Black et al. [6] | 1994 | Female | 84 | 3.4 | High density mass with microlobulated margin | — | Excised |
| Green et al. [7] | 1997 | — | 61 | 2.5 | Unspecified | unspecified | Excised |
| Kontogeorgos et al. [8] | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| B. Maly and A. Maly [9] | 2001 | Female | 15 | 2.0 | Unspecified | unspecified | Excised |
| Dahlstrom et al. [10] | 2001 | Female | 38 | 1.2 | High dense mass with indistinct margin | hypoechoic lesion with a smooth margin | Excised |
| Polat et al. [11] | 2002 | Female | 66 | — | High density circumscribed mass | hypoechoic lesion | Excised |
| Tulbah et al. [12] | 2003 | Female | 18 | — | Not performed | Not perfomed | Excised |
| Brown and Carty [13] | 2005 | Female | 65 | 5.5 | High density mass with microlobulated margin | unspecified | observed |
| Porter et al. [14] | 2006 | Female | 75 | — | High density mass with microlobulated margin | — | — |
| Porter et al. [14] | 2006 | Female | 52 | — | — | hypoechoic round lesion with well-circumscribed margin | — |
| Hayashi et al. [15] | 2007 | Female | 41 | 1.5 | High density mass with spiculation | hypoechoic lesion with irregular margin | Excised |
| Squillaci et al. [16] | 2007 | Male | 40 | 3.5 | High density mass with microlobulated margin | hypoechoic lesion with irregular margin | Excised |
| Ozben et al. [17] | 2009 | Female | 18 | 0.8 | Not performed | hypoechoic lesion | Excised |
| Iwatani et al. [18] | 2012 | Female | 25 | 0.5 | High density mass with distortion | hypoechoic lesion with irregular margin | Excised |
| Paker et al. [19] | 2013 | Male | 17 | 1.5 | Not performed | Not perfomed | Excised |
| Son et al. [20] | 2013 | Female | 41 | 1.1 | High dense mass with indistinct margin | hypoechoic lesion with irregular margin | Excised |
F: female; M: male; US: ultrasonography.
It is believed that local injury may trigger the fibroblastic proliferation [15, 17]. However, the history of trauma was elicited in no more than 10–15% of patients [13]. There was also no history of trauma in our case.
Nodular fasciitis of the breast appears as a hard mass with an irregular shape on both physical examination and radiological evaluation. Because nodular fasciitis has no unique radiological appearance [11], the exact diagnosis can be made only by histopathological examination. Core needle biopsy does not easily diagnose nodular fasciitis because it is difficult to obtain representative cells to make a correct diagnosis [10, 16].
Nodular fasciitis in the breast must be distinguished from benign and malignant breast tumors with nonspecific findings but that are suspected to be malignant [20]. The histological differential diagnosis of nodular fasciitis includes spindle cell tumors such as fibromatosis, myofibroblastoma, spindle cell lipoma, solitary fibrous tumor, phyllodes tumor, spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma, spindle cell melanoma, fibrosarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma. They can be differentiated based on cellularity, nuclear features, collagen content, and growth pattern [16]. Sometimes immunohistochemistry staining (e.g., for CD34) can be helpful with the differential diagnosis [16]. Hence, the diagnosis usually requires histopathological examination of an excisional biopsy [17, 20].
Conservative management or excisional biopsy can be chosen for treatment of nodular fasciitis. A conservative approach is appropriate if the lesion has a typical clinical appearance, with the core biopsy findings consistent with those of nodular fasciitis [13]. In two cases in the literature the lesions were treated successfully with conservative management and disappeared spontaneously. If the criteria for conservative management are not met, however, excisional biopsy is effective, with no further treatment necessary [15, 16]. Recurrence following surgical excision is rare [13, 16, 22].
It is difficult to diagnose nodular fasciitis using imaging or preoperative biopsy. Therefore, to avoid overtreatment, it is necessary to keep the possibility of nodular fasciitis in mind.
4. Conclusion
We report a case of nodular fasciitis of the breast, a rare histological type of breast tumor.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- 1.Baba N, Izuo M, Ishida T, Okano A, Kawai T. Pseudosarcomatous fasciitis of the breast simulating a malignant neoplasm: a case report and ultrastructural study. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1978;8(2):169–180. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fritsches HG, Muller EA. Pseudosarcomatous fasciitis of the breast. Cytologic and histologic features. Acta Cytologica. 1983;27(1):73–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Torngren S, Frisell J, Nilsson R, Wiege M. Nodular fasciitis and fibromatosis of the female breast simulating breast cancer. Case reports. Acta Chirurgica. 1991;157(2):155–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stanley MW, Skoog L, Tani EM, Horwitz CA. Nodular fasciitis: spontaneous resolution following diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 1993;9(3):322–324. doi: 10.1002/dc.2840090316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Benson JR, Mokbel K, Baum M. Management of desmoid tumours including a case report of toremifene. Annals of Oncology. 1994;5(2):173–177. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Black AJM, Kissin MW, Jackson P, Birdsall S, Shipley J, Gusterson BA. Nodular fasciitis—Part I. Simulating breast carcinoma in an 84-year-old woman. Breast. 1994;3(1):48–49. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Green JS, Crozier AE, Walker RA. Case reportnodular fasciitis of the breast. Clinical Radiology. 1997;52(12):961–962. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80234-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kontogeorgos G, Papamichalis G, Bouropoulou V. Fibroblastic lesion of the breast exhibiting features of nodular fasciitis. Archives d’Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques. 1988;36(3):113–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maly B, Maly A. Nodular fasciitis of the breast: report of a case initially diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytologica. 2001;45(5):794–796. doi: 10.1159/000328308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dahlstrom J, Buckingham J, Bell S, Jain S. Nodular fasciitis of the breast simulating breast cancer on imaging. Australasian Radiology. 2001;45(1):67–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Polat P, Kantarci M, Alper F, Gursan N, Suma S, Okur A. Nodular fasciitis of the breast and knee in the same patient. The American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178(6):1426–1428. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tulbah A, Baslaim M, Sorbris R, Al-Malik O, Al-Dayel F. Nodular fasciitis of the breast: a case report. Breast Journal. 2003;9(3):223–225. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown V, Carty NJ. A case of nodular fascitis of the breast and review of the literature. Breast. 2005;14(5):384–387. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Porter GJR, Evans AJ, Lee AHS, Hamilton LJ, James JJ. Unusual benign breast lesions. Clinical Radiology. 2006;61(7):562–569. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hayashi H, Nishikawa M, Watanabe R, et al. Nodular fasciitis of the breast. Breast Cancer. 2007;14(3):337–339. doi: 10.2325/jbcs.14.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Squillaci S, Tallarigo F, Patarino R, Bisceglia M. Nodular fasciitis of the male breast: a case report. International Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2007;15(1):69–72. doi: 10.1177/1066896906295999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ozben V, Aydogan F, Karaca FC, Ilvan S, Uras C. Nodular fasciitis of the breast previously misdiagnosed as breast carcinoma. Breast Care. 2009;4(6):401–402. doi: 10.1159/000261502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Iwatani T, Kawabata H, Miura D, Inoshita N, Ohta Y. Nodular fasciitis of the breast. Breast Cancer. 2012;19(2):180–182. doi: 10.1007/s12282-009-0149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paker I, Kokenek TD, Kacar A, Ceyhan K, Alper M. Fine needle aspiration cytology of nodular fasciitis presenting as a mass in the male breast: report of an unusual case. Cytopathology. 2013;24(3):201–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Son YM, Nahm JH, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim : EK. Imaging findings for malignancy-mimicking nodular fasciitis of the breast and a review of previous imaging studies. Acta Radiologica Short Reports. 2013;2(8) doi: 10.1177/2047981613512830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bernstein KE, Lattes R. Nodular (pseudosarcomatous) fasciitis, a nonrecurrent lesion: clinicopathologic study of 134 cases. Cancer. 1982;49(8):1668–1678. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820415)49:8<1668::aid-cncr2820490823>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Batsakis JG, El-Naggar AK. Pathology consultation: pseudosarcomatous proliferative lesions of soft tissues. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 1994;103(7):578–582. doi: 10.1177/000348949410300713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
