Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2013 Aug 15;252:126–143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.08.008

DOPAMINE D2 AND ACETYLCHOLINE α7 NICOTINIC RECEPTORS HAVE SUBCELLULAR DISTRIBUTIONS FAVORING MEDIATION OF CONVERGENT SIGNALING IN THE MOUSE VENTRAL TEGMENTAL AREA

M GARZÓN a,b,c, A M DUFFY a,d, J CHAN a, M-K LYNCH a, K MACKIE e, V M PICKEL a,*
PMCID: PMC4056450  NIHMSID: NIHMS574553  PMID: 23954803

Abstract

Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChRs) mediate nicotine-induced burst-firing of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), a limbic brain region critically involved in reward and in dopamine D2 receptor (D2R)-related cortical dysfunctions associated with psychosis. The known presence of α7nAChRs and Gi-coupled D2Rs in dopamine neurons of the VTA suggests that these receptors are targeted to at least some of the same neurons in this brain region. To test this hypothesis, we used electron microscopic immunolabeling of antisera against peptide sequences of α7nACh and D2 receptors in the mouse VTA. Dual D2R and α7nAChR labeling was seen in many of the same somata (co-localization over 97%) and dendrites (co-localization over 49%), where immunoreactivity for each of the receptors was localized to endomembranes as well as to non-synaptic or synaptic plasma membranes often near excitatory-type synapses. In comparison with somata and dendrites, many more small axons and axon terminals were separately labeled for each of the receptors. Thus, single-labeled axon terminals were predominant for both α7nAChR (57.9%) and D2R (89.0%). The majority of the immunolabeled axonal profiles contained D2R-immunoreactivity (81.6%) and formed either symmetric or asymmetric synapses consistent with involvement in the release of both inhibitory and excitatory transmitters. Of 160 D2R-labeled terminals, 81.2% were presynaptic to dendrites that expressed α7nAChR alone or together with the D2R. Numerous glial processes inclusive of those enveloping either excitatory- or inhibitory-type synapses also contained single labeling for D2R (n = 152) and α7nAChR (n =561). These results suggest that classic antipsychotic drugs, all of which block the D2R, may facilitate α7nAChR-mediated burst-firing by elimination of D2R-dependent inhibition in neurons expressing both receptors as well as by indirect pre-synaptic and glial mechanisms.

Keywords: electron microscopic immunolabeling, mesocorticolimbic, reward, schizophrenia, addiction

INTRODUCTION

Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic neurons within the midbrain ventral tegmental area (VTA) play a key role in the reinforcing actions of natural rewards and many drugs of abuse, including nicotine, the main addictive component of tobacco (Corrigall et al., 1992; Di Chiara, 2000; Balfour, 2009; Mark et al., 2011). Nicotine acts through nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which are ligand-gated cationic channels consisting of various combinations of alpha (α) and beta (β) subunits, whose mRNAs are widely distributed throughout the VTA and other brain regions (for review see Azam et al., 2002; Collins et al., 2009). nAChR homomers comprising exclusively of the α7 subunit exist as functional alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChRs) that selectively bind the nicotinic antagonist α-bungarotoxin (Orr-Urtreger et al., 1997; Klink et al., 2001; Collins et al., 2009). Binding of α-bungarotoxin is seen in both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic-neurons as well as in many glutamatergic and non-glutamatergic axon terminals in the VTA (Jones and Wonnacott, 2004). In this region of the rodent brain, the mRNA transcript and protein for α7nAChRs are also expressed in many dopaminergic neurons (Seguela et al., 1993; Dominguez del Toro et al., 1994; Charpantier et al., 1998; Azam et al., 2002; Wooltorton et al., 2003). Electrophysiological and pharmacological studies provide further evidence that α7nAChRs are present and functional in dopamine neurons of rat midbrain (Pidoplichko et al., 1997; Wu et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2009).

Activation of α7nAChRs augments burst firing of dopaminergic neurons in the VTA (Schilström et al., 2003), an effect that is opposed by dopamine D2 receptor (D2R)-mediated auto-inhibition (Mercuri et al., 1997; Li et al., 2012). The D2Rs belong to a family of Gi-coupled receptors that similarly to α7nAChR express their mRNAs in many dopamine as well as in non-dopamine neurons in the VTA of rat and other species including human (Meador-Woodruff et al., 1991; Hurd et al., 1994; Haber et al., 1995). Furthermore, electron microscopy has established the presence of D2R immunolabeling in dopamine neurons and in their presynaptic terminals in the rat VTA (Sesack et al., 1994; Pickel et al., 2002). Mesolimbic dopamine neurons in the VTA that project to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) express high levels of D2Rs (Nimitvilai and Brodie, 2010), and are thought to be largely responsible for the reduction in nicotine reward produced by local microinjection of D2R antagonists in the VTA (Sziraki et al., 2002). Intra-VTA administration of the α7nAChR-selective nicotinic antagonist, methyllycaconitine (MLA), also attenuates the conditioned rewarding effects of nicotine and, even more strikingly, reverses the motivational valence of nicotine from rewarding to aversive (Laviolette and van der Kooy, 2003). In addition, the blockade of α7nAChRs markedly reduces the intracranial self-stimulation threshold-reducing action of nicotine (Panagis et al., 2000), as well as intravenous nicotine self-administration (Markou and Paterson, 2001). Taken together, these observations indicate that α7nAChRs in the VTA are critically involved in the underlying mechanisms of nicotine addiction, which may be ascribed in part to direct or indirect activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons under the influence of D2R autoreceptors in this brain region.

In contrast with the well-characterized efficacy of classic antipsychotic drugs, all of which block the D2R (Levin and Rezvani 2007), there is controversy as to whether activation of α7nAChR through cigarette smoking is effective in alleviating either positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia (Olincy and Freedman, 2012; Wylie et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012). A benefit of nicotine as self-medication is supported by the comparatively high incidence of smoking in schizophrenic patients and the greater nicotine dependence in schizotype smokers, who endorse greater positive and fewer negative consequences of smoking (Stewart et al., 2013). Moreover, the CHRNA7 gene has been associated with schizophrenia (Freedman et al. 1997; Olincy et al. 2006; Severance and Yolken 2008). These observations, together with the known presence of the D2 and α7nACh receptors in mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons suggest that these receptors are strategically positioned for involvement in dual control of the output of single neurons in the VTA. We tested this hypothesis using dual-labeling immunoelectron microscopy. The results provide new evidence that in the mouse VTA, α7nAChR and D2R are frequently coexpressed in somata and dendrites, but they are also targeted to separate axon terminals with the D2R terminals being most abundant and most often presynaptic to dendrites containing α7nAChR. These associations, together with the detection of both receptors in perisynaptic glia suggest multiple mechanisms for functional associations between the α7nACh and D2R systems in the VTA.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals

The experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) at the Weill Cornell Medical College. The studies were conducted in adult male C57BL/6J mice (20–25 g; Charles River, Kingston, NY, USA). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. The mice were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of sodium pentobarbital (150 mg/kg) prior to fixation of their brain tissue by vascular perfusion with an aldehyde solution.

Antisera

A mouse monoclonal antibody against the α7nAChR (clone mAb306; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was generated using affinity-purified native chicken and rat α-bungarotoxin-binding proteins (Schoepfer et al., 1990). Epitope mapping has shown that mAb306 recognizes the sequence corresponding to the cytoplasmic loop residues 380–400 of the α7nAChR from rat and chicken (Schoepfer et al., 1990; McLane et al., 1992). This antibody was used previously to study the α7nAChR distribution, in (1) rat and mouse brain using bright field (Dominguez del Toro et al., 1994; Duffy et al., 2009) or electron microscopy (Fabian-Fine et al., 2001; Levy and Aoki, 2002; Duffy et al., 2009) and (2) macaque brain using fluorescent microscopy (Centeno et al., 2006). The α7nAChR antibody has been examined using Western blotting of cultured hippocampal neurons, mouse, rat and macaque brain extracts (Dominguez del Toro et al., 1994; Centeno et al., 2006; Arnaiz-Cot et al., 2008; Duffy et al., 2009).

The D2R antiserum was generated in rabbit using a GST fusion protein containing amino acids 216–311 of the human D2R long isoform (Brana et al., 1997), which was cloned into the pET30c plasmid (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and confirmed by sequencing. The antiserum was affinity-purified first by exclusion on a GST column, and then by retention on a GST-fusion protein (i.e., a GST fusion protein containing the sequence used for immunization) column. This antiserum was shown to be specific by positive immunolabeling in human embryonic kidney cells transiently transfected with the pcDNA-FLAG-D2L plasmid (Kearn et al., 2005). In Western blot analysis, a single band at 50 kDa was recognized by the D2R antiserum, and preadsorption with antigen eliminated the D2R immunoreactive band as well as the immunolabeling seen in sections of the NAc, a region highly enriched in D2Rs (Pickel et al., 2006). In the present study, we also demonstrate an absence of D2R immunoreactivity in dorsal striatum (Fig. 1) of brain tissue from conditional knock-out MSN-D2 KO mice (Drd2loxP/loxP; Adora2a-Cre+/), which was generously provided by Dr. Veronica Alvarez at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. These mutant mice which lack D2R in medium spiny neurons of the striatum were generated by crossing Drd2loxP/loxP mice with Adora2a-Cre+/− mice (B6.FVB(Cg)-Tg(Adora2a-cre) KG139Gsat/Mmucd) that express Cre recombinase in medium spiny neurons of the indirect pathway. Drd2loxP/loxP mice (Drd2tm1Mrub, also known as Drd2loxP/ loxP) carry two targeted loxP sites flanking Drd2 exon 2 and were generated in the laboratory of Dr. Marcelo Rubinstein at INGEBI Bello et al., 2011). MSN-D2 KO mice show a pronounced reduction of Drd2 mRNA and D2R binding in the striatum (Kaplan et al., 2012) and thus, the epitope used for generation of the D2R antibody in the present study, amino acids 216–311 of the human D2 long isoform, is expected to be missing in the striatum, but not the VTA as confirmed in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Photomicrographs showing immunoperoxidase labeling for the D2R in the caudate-putamen nucleus (CPu) of wild-type mice (A) is largely gone in the CPu of MSN-D2 KO mice (B). In contrast, there is no noticeable difference in the density of the labeling in the VTA of wild-type (C) and KO mice (D). Corner arrows point dorsal (d) and medial (m). Scale bars=0.02 μm.

Monoclonal Anti-S-100 (β-subunit) from (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was derived from the SH-B1 hybridoma produced by the fusion of mouse myeloma cells and splenocytes from mice immunized with purified bovine brain S-100b preparation. This antibody recognizes an epitope located on the β-chain (i.e., in S- 100a and S-100b), but not on the α-chain of S-100 (i.e., in S-100a and S-100ao). In enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), recognition of S-100 β-subunit is independent of Ca++ ion. It is also reactive in dot blot using denatured-reduced preparations, and in immunohistochemical staining. Cross-reactivity has been observed with S-100 from human, bovine, porcine, rabbit, cat and rat. The product does not react with other members of the EF-hand family such as calmodulin, and parvalbumin (Baudier et al., 1986), and has previously been shown to be specific by prior adsorption with S-100 protein (Castagna et al., 2003).

Fixation and tissue preparation

The brain tissue was preserved for immunolabeling by vascular perfusion of aldehyde fixatives through the left ventricle of the heart. This was achieved using a Masterflex pump (Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) to sequentially deliver solutions 5–10 ml of normal saline (0.9%) containing 1000 units/ml of heparin followed by approximately 150 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde for light microscopy or 30 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.4) containing 3.75% acrolein and 2% paraformaldehyde, and 150 ml of 2% paraformaldehyde in PB. The brains were removed from the cranium, dissected and postfixed for 30 min in 2% paraformaldehyde. Coronal sections were collected through the midbrain region including the VTA at −3.4 mm from bregma (Paxinos and Franklin, 2001). These were cut at 40-μm thickness into 0.1 M PB at 4 °C on a Leica Vibratome (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA), incubated for 30 min in a solution of 1% sodium borohydride in 0.1 M PB to remove excess of active aldehydes, and rinsed in 0.1 M PB until bubbles disappeared. After extensive rinsing in 0.1 M Tris-buffered saline (TS), the sections were incubated for 30 min in 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 0.1 M TS to minimize nonspecific staining, and then processed for dual-immunocytochemical labeling.

Immunolabeling

For immunocytochemical localization of α7nACh and D2R, sections prepared as described above were processed for single immunoperoxidase or dual immunoperoxidase and immunogold–silver labeling (Chan et al., 1990). The primary antiserum against D2R was raised in rabbit and both the α7nAChR and S100 antibodies were raised in mouse and hence could be distinguished by appropriate species-specific secondary antibodies. Peroxidase and gold markers were switched in alternate sections to maximize the detection of either antigen with methods differing in resolution and sensitivity (Leranth and Pickel, 1989). The sections were incubated for 4 days at 4 °C in a solution of 0.1% BSA in TS-containing mouse monoclonal antibodies against α7nAChR (diluted 1:1000 for immunoperoxidase and 1:250 for immunogold) or S100 (1:500 for immunoperoxidase and 1:100 for immunogold). The rabbit polyclonal antiserum for D2R (diluted 1:800 for immunoperoxidase and 1:200 for immunogold) was added and the incubation continued for 24 more hours at 4 °C. After incubation in these primary antisera, sections were first processed for immunoperoxidase and afterward for immunogold labeling. All the incubations were carried out at room temperature with continuous agitation on a rotator and were followed by several rinses in 0.1 M TS and 0.1 M PB.

For the immunoperoxidase visualization of antigens, the avidin–biotin complex (ABC) method (Hsu et al., 1981) was used. For this, the incubation in primary antisera was followed by incubation in secondary biotinylated antibody (horse anti-mouse IgG for α7nAChR, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, US or goat anti-rabbit IgG for D2R, Jackson, West Grove, PA, USA 1:200) for 30 min and then in ABC (1:100, Vectastain Elite Kit, Vector Lab.) for another 30 min. The immunoreactivity bound to the tissue was visualized by a 6-min incubation in 0.022% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and 0.003% hydrogen peroxide in 0.1 M TS.

These sections were then prepared for silver-enhanced immunogold labeling by the method of Chan et al. (1990). Thus, they were rinsed in 0.1 M TS, transferred to 0.1 M PB, blocked for 10 min in 0.8% BSA and 0.1% gelatin in 0.05 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and incubated overnight in colloidal gold (0.8 nm)-labeled antibody (donkey anti-mouse IgG for α7nAChR, or goat anti-rabbit IgG for D2R, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA, USA, 1:50). After this, the sections were reacted with a silver solution IntenSEM kit (GE Lifesciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for 6–7 min for electron microscopy.

Light and electron microscopy

Immunolabeled VTA sections used for light microscopy were mounted on glass slides, dehydrated and coverslipped prior to viewing with a Nikon microscope. Immunolabeled tissue used for electron microscopy was postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PB for 1 h, dehydrated through a series of graded ethanols and propylene oxide, and incubated overnight in a 1:1 mixture of propylene oxide and Epon (EMbed-812; Electron Microscopy Sciences). The sections were transferred to 100% Epon for 2 h and flat-embedded in Epon between two sheets of Aclar plastic (Honeywell, Pottsville, PA, USA). The flat-embedded plastic sections were glued on Epon blocks and trimmed to approximately 1–2 mm2 surface-truncated pyramids in the VTA. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were cut from the outer surface of the tissue with a diamond knife (Diatome, Fort Washington, PA, USA) by using an ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). The regions examined were located in the VTA at the levels of anteroposterior planes −3.4 to −3.6 mm from Bregma of the mouse brain atlas of Paxinos and Franklin (2001). The sections were collected on 400-mesh copper grids, counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963), and examined with a Tecnai Biotwin 12 (Serial # D271) electron microscope (FEI Company, Hilsboro, OR, USA).

Data analysis

Only ultrathin sections near the surface of the tissue at the Epon-tissue interface were examined in order to reduce false negatives due to inadequate penetration of antisera. The classification of identified cellular elements was based on the descriptions of Peters et al. (1991). Axon terminals were identified by the presence of numerous synaptic vesicles and were at least 0.2 μm in diameter. Small unmyelinated axons were <0.2 μm and rarely contained small vesicles. Neuronal somata were identified by the presence of a nucleus, Golgi apparatus, and rough endoplasmic reticulum. Dendrites usually contained abundant endoplasmic reticulum, and were distinguished from unmyelinated axons by their larger diameter and/or abundance of uniformly distributed microtubules. In addition, dendrites were in many cases postsynaptic to axon terminals. Glial profiles were distinguished by their irregular shape, which followed the contours of neuronal profiles. The glial cytoplasm also often contained bundles of filaments. Asymmetric synapses were recognized by thick postsynaptic densities (asymmetric synapses, type Gray I), while symmetric synapses had thin pre- and postsynaptic specializations (symmetric synapses, type Gray II; Gray, 1959). Zones of closely spaced parallel plasma membranes, which lacked discernible synaptic densities, but were otherwise not separated by glial processes, were defined as appositions or non-synaptic contacts, and were not included in the quantification unless specifically stated. A profile was considered to be selectively immunoperoxidase labeled when it contained cytoplasmic precipitates making it appear more electron dense than morphologically similar profiles located within the surrounding neuropil. A profile was considered to contain immunogold labeling when two or more gold particles were observed within large profiles. However, in dendrites smaller than 0.5-μm diameter and in small unmyelinated axons a single particle was considered positive immunogold-labeling, since almost no gold–silver deposits were seen over myelin and other tissue elements not known to express the receptors under examination. The validity of this approach was established previously for other receptors (Garzón et al., 1999; Garzón and Pickel, 2006) and has also been used for α7nAChR and D2R in the cerebral cortex (Duffy et al., 2009, 2011). In addition, however, we examined the number of gold particles over dendritic and axonal profiles in control experiments in which the tissue was processed for dual immunolabeling with the omission of one of the respective primary antisera to assess the level of background spurious gold–silver particles.

The ultrastructural quantitative analysis of receptor distributions was carried out in 17 vibratome sections with α7nAChR- and D2R-immunolabeling that were obtained from four mice. All immunoreactive processes (n=4983) were counted in randomly sampled electron micrographs at magnifications of 18,500× from an area of 24,912.2 μm2. The tissue was quantitatively examined to determine the relative frequencies with which the immunoreactive products were localized within neuronal somata, dendrites, axons or glial cells. Morphologically recognizable synaptic relationships of each labeled profile, as well as non-synaptic appositional contacts among immunoreactive profiles for α7nAChR and/or D2R were also quantified in a smaller sample taken from six vibratome sections through the VTA in two mice. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using JMP (SAS, Cary, NC, USA) to ensure that there was no significant inter-animal variability in the area density (number of immunolabeled processes per area of examined surface) of immunoreactive profiles for α7nAChR and/or D2R. Variations in the density (mean number per cross-sectional surface unit) of asymmetric and symmetric synapses established by α7nAChR- and/or D2R-immunolabeled profiles were assessed using Student t-tests.

The light and electron microscopic images used for the figures were acquired respectively from a (1) Nikon Microphot-FX microscope equipped with a digital SNAP 2 camera (Photometrics Inc.) and (2) Tecnai 12 electron microscope (FEI, Mahwah, NJ) equipped with an AMT digital camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corporation, Danvers, MA, USA) on a computer using a Windows XP operating system. Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) was used for adjustment of brightness, contrast and sharpness. The final images were then imported to PowerPoint software for assembly and labeling of composite figures.

RESULTS

Electron microscopy established that α7nAChR and D2R are localized within many of the same somatodendritic and in a few of the same as well as in many separate pre-synaptic neuronal and glial profiles in the mouse VTA. The well-known high sensitivity of the immunoperoxidase method allowed detection of immunoreactivity in more profiles compared with immunogold. The global distribution of immunolabeling for α7nAChR- and/or D2R in different cellular compartments with either method was, however, rather similar, and there were no apparent differences in frequencies or types of associations between differentially labeled profiles. Hence, for statistical analysis we grouped the numbers obtained using both markers. The data from different animals were also pooled, since there were no significant variations in the number of α7nAChR- and/or D2R-labeled profiles per unit area (immunolabeling area density) among different animals (α7nAChR, F3,5=2.7161, p=0.1548; D2R, F3,5=0.9736, p=0.4745; dual α7nAChR + D2R, F3,5=1.7750, p=0.2681; Table 1). The requirements for parametric statistical analysis, such as random sampling, normal distribution of data and finite measuring level were fulfilled in our data.

Table 1.

Immunolabeling density for α7nAChR and/or D2R within the mouse VTA in each animal included in the study

Animal α7nAChR D2R α7nAChR+D2R
Animal 1 0.61±0.49 2.74 ±0.38 0.67±0.28
Animal 2 1.18±0.69 3.45 ±0.54 1.16±0.39
Animal 3 2.26±0.35 3.28 ±0.27 1.45±0.20
Animal 4 1.83±0.49 2.66 ±0.38 1.22±0.28

Area density (number of immunoreactive profiles per square micron) for different VTA immunolabeling (α7nAChR and/or D2R) in each of four animals. Data are expressed as mean±standard error. Data were collected from 14 vibratome sections in four mice processed for dual labeling.

Somatodendritic distribution of α7nAChR and D2R immunoreactivity

In somata, α7nAChR immunoreactivity was located most frequently in tubulovesicular endomembranes within the cytoplasm. In tissue processed for immunoperoxidase, α7nAChR was observed as cytoplasmic aggregates that tended to be associated with cisterns of the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex, but were also sometimes seen on restricted portions of the plasma membrane (Fig. 2A). The α7nAChR-labeled somata received mainly symmetric synaptic contacts from axon terminals that were unlabeled or contained D2R immunoreactivity (Fig. 2A). Most of the α7nAChR-immunolabeled somata also expressed D2R (n=34, 97.1%; Table 2), which had a similar cellular distribution to that reported previously by Sesack et al. (1994) and Pickel et al. (2002).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

α7nAChR distribution in somata and dendrites with or without D2R. (A) A dark precipitous α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase reaction product (white block arrows) is observed rimming a multivesicular body (mvb) and the cisterns of endoplasmic reticulum and other endomembranes, as well as the plasma membrane of a neuronal soma (α7-soma). The soma receives synaptic contact from an axon terminal showing D2R gold particles (D2-t). (B) Aggregates of α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase (white block arrows) are observed within a dendrite receiving synaptic input from an unlabeled axon terminal (ut). (C) A clump of α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase reaction product (white block arrow) is localized in a dendrite (α7+D2-d) that also contains one cytoplasmic immunogold particle (small black arrow) for D2R. The dendrite receives an asymmetric synapse (black curved arrow) from an unlabeled axon terminal (ut). (D) Diffuse α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase labeling is seen in a dendrite (α7+D2-d) that also contains D2R-immunogold particles (small black arrows). The α7+D2-d shows an extensive plasmalemmal apposition with a dendrite exclusively labeled for D2R (D2-d), which receives what appears to be an asymmetric synapse from an unlabeled axon terminal (ut). (E) α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase aggregates (white block arrows) are clustered in an otherwise diffusely labeled dendrite (α7+D2-d) that also contains both cytoplasmic and plasmalemmal gold particles (small black arrow) for D2R. The dually-labeled α7+D2-d receives an asymmetric synapse (curved black arrow) from an unlabeled terminal (ut). (F) An unlabeled axon terminal (ut) makes a thick synaptic contact with a dendrite (α7+D2-d) showing D2R gold particles (small black arrows). The D2R immunogold particles are located beneath the postsynaptic specialization and distant from the synapse near an aggregate of α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase reaction product. Scale bars=500 nm.

Table 2.

Subcellular distribution of α7nAChR and D2R in the VTA

Profile Type α7nAChR labeling
D2R labeling
Total Single (α7) Dual Total Single (D2) Dual
Somata 35 1 (2.9%) 34 (97.1%) 34 0 (0%) 34 (100%)
Dendrites 1602 800 (49.9%) 802 (50.1%) 1633 831 (50.9%) 802 (49.1%)
Dendritic Spines 13 10 (76.9%) 3 (23.1%) 19 16 (84.2%) 3 (15.8%)
Axon Terminals 309 179 (57.9%) 130 (42.1%) 1178 1048 (89.0%) 130 (11.0%)
Unmyelinated Axons 142 132 (93.0%) 10 (7.0%) 199 189 (95.0%) 10 (5.0%)
Glia 646 561 (86.8%) 85 (13.2%) 237 152 (64.1%) 85 (35.9%)
TOTAL 2747 1683 (61.3%) 1064 (38.7%) 3300 2236 (67.8%) 1064 (32.2%)

Immunolabeling for α7nAChR and/or D2R in different neuronal compartments within the mouse VTA. Profiles containing single α7nAChR-, single D2R- and dual α7nAChR +D2R-labelings are given as raw numbers and as percentage of the total α7nAChR and/or total D2R immunolabeled profiles in each category. Data were collected from 14 vibratome sections in four mice processed for dual labeling.

In small dendrites, α7nAChR immunoperoxidase labeling was typically seen in aggregates having a restricted distribution within the cytoplasm (Fig. 2B, E) or on the inner face of the plasma membrane (Fig. 2C, E, F), although in some dendrites the labeling had a more diffuse cytoplasmic distribution. This diffuse localization of α7nAChR was more common in larger dendrites (Fig. 2D). The α7nAChR immunogold labeling was also localized to select segments of the dendritic plasma membrane contacted by axon terminals (Fig. 3) and sometimes seen on the postsynaptic densities of synaptic specializations established with those terminals (Fig. 3B, C). The dendrites containing exclusively α7nAChR-immunoreactivity received twice as many asymmetric compared with symmetric synapses from either D2R-labeled (Figs. 3B, C and 4C, D) or unlabeled (Figs. 2B and 3B) axon terminals.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

D2R immunoperoxidase in axon terminals presynaptic to α7nAChR-labeled dendrites. (A) An axon terminal containing D2R immunoperoxidase labeling (D2-t) forms an asymmetric synapse with a dendrite (α7+D2-d) showing multiple cytoplasmic gold particles for α7nAChR (small black arrows) and also immunoperoxidase precipitate for D2R in tubulovesicular membranes (white block arrows). (B) A D2R-labeled terminal (D2-t) is presynaptic to dendrite showing plasmalemmal gold particles (small black arrows) for α7nAChR (α7-d) and receiving convergent synaptic input from an unlabeled axon terminal (ut). (C) D2R-immunoperoxidase labeling is seen in an axon terminal that forms an asymmetric synapse with a dendrite containing α7nAChR-immunogold particles (small black arrows) in the cytoplasm and in extrasynaptic and synaptic portions of the plasma membrane (α7-d). (D) D2R-immunperoxidase precipitate is seen within several axon terminals (D2-t) making contacts with dendrites showing immunogold particles (small black arrows) for α7nAChR (α7-d). In two of those terminals (D2-t1,2) showing discernible synapses with the dendrites, the D2R-immunoperoxidase is seen concentrated in the presynaptic sides facing α7-d1,2. The surrounding neuropil contains two small unmyelinated axons (α7-a1,2) with plasmalemmal α7nAChR immunogold particles (small black arrows. Scale bars=500 nm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Subcellular distribution of D2R in axon terminals providing input to either D2R- or α7nAChR-immuolabeled dendrites. (A) D2R immunogold particles are seen within the cytoplasm and on small synaptic vesicles of an axon terminal (D2-t) that makes a symmetric synapse onto a dendrite (D2-d) containing also D2R-immunogold (small black arrows). (B) An axon terminal (D2-t) containing D2R-immunogold makes an asymmetric synapse with a dendrite (D2-d) showing synaptic D2R-immunogold particles (small black arrows). (C) D2R gold particles are observed rimming the membranes of small synaptic vesicles (ssv) within an axon terminal (D2-t) establishing an apparently asymmetric synapse with a dendrite (α7-d) containing a dense intracytoplasmic aggregate of α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase. (D) α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase clumps are seen beneath extrasynaptic portions of the plasma membrane of a dendrite (α7-d) receiving asymmetric synaptic input from a D2R immunogold-labeled terminal (D2-t1). The D2-t1 shows an appositional contact with another axon terminal (D2-t2) containing D2R gold particles (small black arrows). D2R immunogold=small black arrows; Scale bars=500 nm.

Dual α7nAChR- and D2R-labeled dendrites were as prevalent as single α7nAChR-immunoreactive dendrites and almost as numerous as D2R-labeled dendrites (Table 2). Accordingly, dually-labeled dendrites comprised about half of the total dendrites containing α7nAChR or D2R labeling (Fig. 5). The α7nAChR and D2R were seen both in plasmalemmal and cytoplasmic localizations within the same dendrite. The immunolabeling for α7nAChR and D2R were observed in close proximity within the cytoplasm in some dendrites (Fig. 3A), and also at a distance in others (Fig. 2C, E). Dual α7nAChR- and D2R-labeled dendrites received mainly asymmetric inputs (n=173, 81.3%) from either unlabeled (Fig. 2C, E, F) or D2R-labeled (Figs. 3A, 5B and 7A) axon terminals; synaptic contacts from terminals expressing α7nAChR were much less commonly seen (Table 3).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Co-localization of D2R and α7nAChR labeling in dendrites. (A) α7nAChR immunogold particles (small black arrows) are seen within the cytoplasm and on the postsynaptic density of an incoming synapse from an unlabeled terminal (ut) within a dendrite (α7+D2-d) that also contains diffuse D2R-immunoperoxidase labeling. (B) An axon terminal (D2-t) showing dense D2R immunoperoxidase makes what appears to be an obliquely sectioned asymmetric synapse with a dendrite (α7+D2-d) containing both light D2R immunoperoxidase and α7nAChR immunogold particles (small black arrows). (C) α7nAChR immunogold particles (small black arrows) and D2R immunoperoxidase are seen within a dendrite (α7+D2-d) that receives convergent input from two unlabeled axon terminals (ut1,2). A dendrite containing exclusively D2R immunoperoxidase labeling (D2-d) and a small unmyelinated axon (α7-a) showing plasmalemmal α7nAChR immunogold particles (small black arrow) are observed in the nearby neuropil. Scale bars=500 nm.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Glial distribution of α7nAChR, D2 receptor and S100. (A) An intensely α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase-labeled glial profile (α7-g) opposes a dendrite (α7+D2-d) containing D2R immunogold (small black arrows) and light α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase reaction product. The labeled glial process also partially contacts a D2R immunogold (small black arrows)-labeled axon terminal (D2-t) presynaptic to the α7+D2-d. (B) The α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase is seen in a glial profile (α7-g) opposing a dendrite (α7-d) that also contains clumps of α7nAChR peroxidase reaction product. The α7-g has thin expansions that partially form a common coating for α7-d and a D2R immunogold (small black arrows)-labeled axon terminal (D2-t) presynaptic to an unlabeled dendrite. (C) Glial profiles containing both α7nAChR gold particles (small black arrows) and immunoperoxidase D2R labeling (α7nAChR+D2R-g) are opposed to a dual-labeled α7nAChR+D2R-d. The dually labeled dendrite is receptive to an axon terminal containing peroxidase labeling for the D2R (D2-t). Insert shows a comparable dual-labeled glial process in another plane of section. (D and E) Immunogold D2R labeling (small arrows) is seen in glial profiles containing immunoperoxidase labeling for S100 (S100+D2-g). In D, the dually labeled glial process opposes many unlabeled axon terminals (ut) and a dendrite that also contains D2R immunogold (D2-d). In E, the dually labeled glial profile opposes many unlabeled dendritic and axonal profiles, while D2R (small arrows) is seen in a more distant dendrite (D2-d) and presynaptic terminal (D2-t). Scale bar=500 nm.

Table 3.

Distribution of synaptic inputs to α7nAChR- and/or D2R-immunolabeled dendrites in the VTA

Type of dendrite Synapses Presynaptic terminal (%)
Unlabeled D2R α7nAChR+D2R α7nAChR
D2R 244 159 (65.2%) 67 (27.4%) 9 (3.7%) 9 (3.7%)
α7nAChR+D2R 267 161 (60.3%) 84 (31.5%) 11 (4.1%) 11 (4.1%)
α7nAChR 309 141 (45.6%) 118 (38.2%) 17 (5.5%) 33 (10.7%)
Total 820 461 (56.2%) 269 (32.8%) 37 (4.5%) 53 (6.5%)

Distribution of synapses made by dendrites labeled for α7nAChR and/or D2R in the mouse VTA with respect to the immunoreactivity contained in the presynaptic axon terminal. Synapses are given as raw numbers and as percentage of the total synapses in each category. Data were collected from six vibratome sections in two mice processed for dual labeling.

D2R immunoreactivity was seen alone in many dendrites (n=831, 50.9%), where the labeling was localized often to cytoplasmic endomembranes (Figs. 2D and 3A) or to segments of the plasma membrane (Figs. 2D and 5C). Immunogold particles for D2R also were identified on postsynaptic sides of synaptic junctions in dendrites that were either labeled (Fig. 2F) or not (Fig. 3B) for α7nAChR. D2R-labeled dendrites received many asymmetric-type synaptic contacts from unlabeled (n=94, 70.7%; Fig. 2D) or D2R-immunoreactive (n=30, 22.6%; Fig. 3A, B) axon terminals, and much more infrequently from α7nAChR-labeled terminals (n=5, 3.7%; Table 3).

Axonal distribution of α7nAChR and D2R immunoreactivities

As compared with dendrites, axonal profiles more rarely contained α7nAChR immunoreactivity (Table 2). Only 16.4% of the total α7nAChR labeling was localized to axonal profiles, either to small unmyelinated axons (n=142; 5.2%) or to axon terminals (n=309; 11.2%). Small unmyelinated axons labeled for α7nAChR usually were dispersed in the neuropil within bundles containing other small axons that were unlabeled (Fig. 6). However, some of the α7nAChR-labeled axons apposed terminals that either were unlabeled or contained D2R (Fig. 3D). Within these axons, the α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase reaction product was diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6A, B), whereas the α7nAChR-immunogold was more discretely localized to the plasma membrane (Figs. 3B, 5C). The α7nAChR-immunolabeled axon terminals, of which 42.1% also contained D2R (n=130), formed either asymmetric (n=43) or symmetric (n=20) synaptic specializations with dendrites (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

α7nAChR distribution in unmyelinated axons and glia. (A) α7nAChR immunoperoxidase is seen in transversally sectioned unmyelinated axons that show organized arrangement of microtubules (α7-a1–3). (B) Diffuse α7nAChR immunoperoxidase is observed in a small unmyelinated axon (α7-a) contacting a dendrite (α7+D2-d) showing α7nAChR immunoperoxidase and D2R immunogold (small black arrows). The α7nAChR immunoperoxidase is also observed near the plasma membrane of an astrocytic expansion (α7-g1). Another astrocytic process (α7-g2), lightly gray-shaded and depicting contour in discontinuous trace for easier recognition, contains aggregates of α7nAChR immunoperoxidase). The α7-g2 opposes and partially wraps the dually-labeled α7+D2-d. (C) Immunogold-labeled α7nAChR (small black arrows) is seen in a terminal (α7-t) making an asymmetric synapse (curved arrow) onto a α7-labeled dendrite (α7-d). A peroxidase-labeled D2R-labeled terminal is located adjacent to the same dendrite (curved white arrow). A small tubulovesicle (tv) is associated with two α7 gold particles. Unlabeled Dendrite=ud, α7 axon=α7-a. Scale bars=500 nm.

Axonal profiles containing D2R immunoreactivity were abundant in the VTA (n=1377). Most of the D2R-immunolabeled axonal profiles were axon terminals (n=1178, 85.5%), the majority of which did not contain α7nAChRs (n=1048, 89%). The D2R immunoperoxidase reaction product was seen as a dense precipitate that rimmed synaptic vesicles (Figs. 3, 7C). Aggregates of D2R immunoperoxidase labeling were also detected on and near the presynaptic membrane specialization (Figs. 3C, D and 6C) or within the cytoplasm (Fig. 5B). In addition, D2R immunoreactivity was evident on select segments of the plasma membrane away from synaptic contacts, and opposed by glial profiles (Fig. 7C, D). D2R-immunogold had a similar distribution, to that of the immunoperoxidase labeling, but was more frequently localized to small synaptic vesicles within axon terminals (Figs. 4 and 7A, B).

About half of the D2R-labeled terminals (48.2%) had synaptic junctions in the plane of section, showing a prevalence of asymmetric (Fig. 4; n=201, 74.4%) over symmetric (Fig. 6C; n=69, 25.6%) synapses. The postsynaptic targets were mainly unlabeled dendrites, but also included dendrites immunoreactive for D2R and/or α7nAChR (Fig. 8; Table 3). Each of these types of dendrites was rather similar in their receipt of asymmetric and symmetric synapses.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Bar graphs showing the synaptic area density (number of synapses per surface unit area) distribution of asymmetric or symmetric synapses made by axon terminals immunolabeled for D2R (D2R) and/or α7nAChR (α7R) with dendrites in the VTA. These dendrites are unlabeled (Un) or contain immunolabeling for α7R, D2R or both receptors (dual). Synaptic area density, shown in the Y axis, is expressed as the number of synapses per 1000 μm2 of analyzed tissue, calculated from the tallied micrograph area in which the synapses were counted for each group. The raw numbers of synapses are shown on top of each bar as the ratio value with respect to the total number of synapses within the group. Data were collected from six vibratome sections through the VTA in two mice. In three sections markers were reversed (immunogold or immunoperoxidase) to the other three, and both animals included sections of either type.

Glial distribution of α7nAChR and D2R immunoreactivities

Many glial processes resembling those of astrocytes contained α7nAChR and/or D2R immunolabeling (Figs. 6 and 7A–C). These glial processes comprised one-third of all single α7nAChR-labeled profiles (n=561, 33.3%; Table 2). The α7nAChR-immunoperoxidase in glial processes was distributed in expansions wrapping presynaptic terminals and dendrites immunolabeled for α7nAChR with or without D2R (Fig. 7A–C). These axon terminals were unlabeled (Fig. 7B) or D2R-labeled (Fig. 7A). The α7nAChR-immunogold labeling was often localized to glial processes enveloping synapses (Fig. 7C). Glial-like profiles also contained D2R labeling, and over one-third of these profiles also contained α7nAChR immunoreactivity (n=85, 35.9%; Table 2 and Fig. 7C–E). In a separate series of dual labeling experiments 26/ 177 of the D2R-labeled profiles contained S100-immunoreactivity. These glial profiles were frequently opposed to dendritic profile with (Fig. 7D) or without (Fig. 7E) D2R labeling.

DISCUSSION

Our results provide immunocytochemical evidence that α7nACh and D2R are targeted to many of the same, as well as to synaptically linked neurons and their opposing glia in the mouse VTA. The co-localization of α7nAChR and D2R within some of the same somatodendritic profiles in this region suggests that there may be convergent signaling between the α7-subunit and D2R G-protein pathways in postsynaptic neurons of the VTA. In contrast with somata and dendrites, presynaptic α7nAChR and D2R labeling was largely found in separate axons and axon terminals with the D2R being more prevalent than the α7nAChR in these presynaptic sites. In addition, we have shown that axon terminals containing the D2R often form symmetric or asymmetric synapses or are opposed to dendrites expressing α7nAChR and/or D2R, indicating a key role of the D2R in the presynaptic release of different neurotransmitters or modulators affecting the activity of VTA neurons responsive to α7nAChR and/or D2R ligands. The further localization of α7nAChR alone or together with the D2R in perisynaptic glia in this brain region also suggests a non-neuronal mechanism by which these ligands can affect synaptic transmission in the VTA. The findings have important implications for the understanding the shared effectiveness of nicotine and D2R antagonists in ameliorating some of the symptoms of schizophrenia.

Methodological considerations

Dual ultrastructural localization of α7nAChR and D2R was achieved by combining immunogold and immunoperoxidase pre-embedding techniques for identification of their respective antisera in single sections of tissue (Chan et al., 1990). The specificity of these antisera was described previously (Pickel et al., 2006; Duffy et al., 2009, 2011) and that of the D2R further confirmed in the dorsal striatum of MSN-D2R KO. Each receptor had a similar subcellular location when detected with either the immunogold or immunoperoxidase method, and reversal of markers assured that each antigen was optimally identified by methods having different sensitivities and resolution. Profiles were considered immunolabeled when they contained one or more gold particles or a peroxidase reaction product with an electron density greater than that seen in nearby profiles. The validity of considering small profiles with only one immunogold particle as specifically labeled has been established for other neurotransmitter receptors (Garzón and Pickel, 2006; Hara et al., 2006) and has proved to be valid for α7nAChR in the cerebral cortex (Duffy et al., 2009, 2011). However, the method is dependent on first establishing that there are a minimal number of particles overlying myelin and other tissue elements expected not to contain the antigen of interest (Wang et al., 2003). In the present study, this criterion was met for the immunogold labeling of both α7nAChR and D2R. Moreover, we observed no immunolabeling in VTA tissue processed with the omission of the primary antibody thus assuring a minimal false-positive labeling. However, the often sparse labeling for both the α7nAChR and D2R may have contributed to an underestimation of the number of both neuronal and glial profiles that express α7nAChR and D2R in the VTA. To circumvent the false-negative data resulting from inadequate penetration of immunoreagents, ultrathin sections were collected exclusively from the tissue-plastic interface from vibratome sections.

Somatodendritic distribution of α7nAChR and D2R

The α7nAChR-immunoreactivity was seen in large cytoplasmic aggregates in somata and proximal dendrites that also frequently contained D2R, a location comparable to that reported previously in the prefrontal cortex (Duffy et al., 2011). The cytoplasmic aggregates of α7nAChR labeling may reflect large intracellular receptor reserve pools providing a mechanism for the rapid ACh-induced up-regulation of the nAChR by mobilization from their cytoplasmic stores (Drenan et al., 2008; Millar and Harkness, 2008).

Both α7nAChR and D2R were also distributed along tubulovesicular membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum or endosomal multivesicular bodies, suggesting sites of synthesis/transfer and degradation, respectively, of these receptor proteins (Keller et al., 2001; Prou et al., 2001; Piper and Katzmann, 2007; Geetha and Wooten, 2008; Kim et al., 2008; Rezvani et al., 2010). In some cases, both the α7nAChR and D2R were localized to single segments of endomembranes suggesting their involvement in trafficking and assembly of the nAChRs (Gelman et al., 1995; Green and Millar, 1995; Wanamaker and Green, 2007) and D2R (Free et al., 2007). Collectively, these observations support a postsynaptic neuronal affiliation between nAChR α7 subunits and the G-protein coupled D2R in the VTA, which is similar to that proposed in the prefrontal cortex (Duffy et al., 2011). Likewise, analogous interactions including many cellular G-protein pathways had been demonstrated between nAChR beta-2 subunits and nAChR-interacting proteins (Kabbani et al., 2007). Thus, α7nAChR labeling in somata and large dendrites most likely reflect dynamic sites involved in intracellular trafficking of the surface receptors.

Our observation of α7nAChR in dendrites is consistent with nicotine activation of VTA dopaminergic neurons in vivo (Grenhoff et al., 1986; Mereu et al., 1987) or in vitro in deafferented slice preparations (Calabresi et al., 1989; Pidoplichko et al., 1997; Picciotto et al., 1998). There are some data suggesting that the stimulatory effect of nicotine on VTA dopaminergic neurons could largely be due to the activation of beta2-subunit containing nAChR (Picciotto et al., 1998; Schilström et al., 2003). However, there is also substantial evidence that the underlying mechanism involves an increase in Ca2+ entry through α7nAChR present on dopaminergic neuronal somata or dendrites and the subsequent activation of Ca2+- dependent K+ channels (Kitai et al., 1999; Mameli-Engvall et al., 2006). Furthermore, our finding of α7nAChR in the somatodendritic compartment of VTA neurons agrees with the identification of alpha-bungaratoxin- and MLA-sensitive whole-cell currents evoked by nicotine in dissociated VTA neurons using patch-clamp recordings (Yang et al., 2009).

The observed, dendritic distribution of α7nAChR on extra- or peri-synaptic plasma membranes close to mainly asymmetric but also symmetric contacts, suggests a prominent role of α7nAChR as postsynaptic modulator of excitatory as well as inhibitory signaling in VTA neurons. Excitatory input to this region arises prominently from the cerebral cortex, but also derives from the mesopontine tegmentum and subthalamic nucleus (Geisler et al., 2007). These glutamate-containing inputs to VTA are known to partially drive the synaptic plasticity underlying neural adaptation to addictive drugs (Saal et al., 2003; Jin et al., 2011). The present localization of α7nAChR to postsynaptic membrane specializations in dendrites of the VTA is comparable to that of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) receptors and supports the idea that activation of the postsynaptic α7nAChR can initiate a Ca2+ signal that produces a calmodulin-dependent reduction in the responsiveness of glutamate NMDA receptors (Fisher and Dani, 2000). In addition, the localization of α7nAChR to postsynaptic densities of asymmetric synapses is consistent with the blocking of nicotinic activation of mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons by antagonists of ionotropic glutamate receptors (Schilström et al., 1998; Grillner and Svensson, 2000). Our observation of α7nAChR labeling in dendrites that receive symmetric inputs is consistent with reported involvement of the α7nAChR in postsynaptic modulation of responses mediated by GABA-A (Zhang and Berg, 2007) and GABA-B receptors in the VTA (Amantea and Bowery, 2004).

The present localization of D2R on or near the dendritic plasma membrane may indicate sites relevant to coupling of Gi/o-like proteins involved in modulating ion channels and/or decreasing adenylate cyclase activity, which can elicit inhibitory postsynaptic currents and inhibition in these dendrites (Johnson and North, 1992; Missale et al., 1998; Beckstead et al., 2004). The prevalence of D2R labeling on plasma membranes near asymmetric synapses that are typical of glutamatergic terminals is consistent with involvement of D2Rs in the modulation of synaptic plasticity of excitatory synapses in the VTA (Thomas et al., 2000). Psychostimulants binding to the D2R can produce long-term potentiation of excitatory postsynaptic current mediated through AMPA (Saal et al., 2003; Bellone and Lüscher, 2006) and NMDA (Ahn et al., 2010) receptors in the VTA. Our data, thus, support D2R-mediated effects of dopamine on VTA neurons (Lacey et al., 1987), which may be ascribed in part to modulation of postsynaptic glutamate currents affecting both basal firing and bursting activity of mesolimbic dopamine neurons (Beckstead et al., 2004).

Somatodendritic processes accounted for the majority of the profiles containing both the α7nAChR and the D2R in the VTA. When the two receptors were co-expressed in common soma, both proteins were occasionally seen in overlapping endomembrane structures, suggesting shared synthesis and trafficking machinery. In dendritic processes, α7nAChR and D2R were usually located more in plasma membranes near asymmetric inputs, advocating for co-modulation of postsynaptic excitatory transmission in the VTA.

Localization of α7nACh and D2 receptors to excitatory postsynaptic densities

The present localization of α7nACh to postsynaptic membrane specializations at mainly excitatory synapses is similar to previous observations in the cerebral cortex (Duffy et al., 2009, 2011). This distribution is shared by NMDA receptors and is consistent with evidence showing that activation of the postsynaptic α7nAChR can initiate a Ca2+ signal that produces a calmodulin-dependent reduction in the responsiveness of glutamate NMDA receptors (Fisher and Dani, 2000).

The D2R was also seen on and near excitatory-type postsynaptic membrane specializations, consistent with G-protein pathways that can modulate glutamate NMDA currents (Martina and Bergeron, 2008). In addition, D2R stimulation can decrease the surface and synaptic expression of GluR1, an obligatory subunit of glutamate AMPA receptors (Sun et al., 2005). Thus, the activation of the D2R may modulate both the NMDA and AMPA receptor-mediated postsynaptic responses in VTA neurons. Moreover, the less commonly observed expression of plasmalemmal D2R near symmetric synapses suggests that these receptors are potentially involved in modulating slow GABA-dependent inhibitory currents, through activation of GABA receptors and G-protein- coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels (Johnson and North, 1992; Cruz et al., 2004; Labouèbe et al., 2007).

Presynaptic distribution of α7nACh and D2 receptors

Nicotine increases extracellular concentrations of glutamate and aspartate in the VTA (Schilström et al., 2000). Supporting this, numerous binding sites for the α7nAChR agonist α-bungarotoxin have been observed in immunocytochemically-identified glutamatergic axons within the VTA (Jones and Wonnacott, 2004). The present localization of α7nAChR to axon terminals making asymmetric synapses is consistent with presynaptic facilitation of glutamate release that has been proposed to be mediated mainly by α7nAChR in the VTA (Mansvelder and McGehee, 2000; Schilström et al., 2000; Jones and Wonnacott 2004; Good and Lupica 2009). The α7nAChR is known to be involved in the modulation of presynaptic NMDA receptor expression and in the structural plasticity of glutamatergic axons in the VTA (Gao et al., 2010; Mao et al., 2011). The paucity of α7nAChR-labeled terminals forming excitatory-type synapses in this region suggests, however, that there may be alternative mechanisms contributing to nicotine-induced potentiation of glutamatergic transmission as is discussed in the section on perisynaptic astrocytes containing α7nAChR.

Unlike the α7nAChR, D2R in the VTA was observed in many axon terminals. Within these terminals, D2R was localized mainly over membranes of synaptic vesicles, a distribution similar to that of the inhibitory Gi-protein (Aronin and DiFiglia, 1992). The D2R-labeled terminals were often without recognizable synaptic junctions, although some formed symmetric or more commonly asymmetric synapses. This morphological heterogeneity suggests involvement of the D2R in presynaptic regulation of the release of functionally diverse transmitters.

Our results suggest a predominant involvement of the D2R in presynaptic release of glutamate or other excitatory transmitters in axon terminals forming asymmetric excitatory-type synapses on dendrites including those that express the α7nAChR. D2R activation inhibits presynaptic release of glutamate in the VTA (Koga and Momiyama, 2000). Classic antipsychotics blocking D2R may enable, thus, disinhibition of glutamate release onto dendrites also responsive to α7nAChR agonists, which is critically involved in behaviors such as instrumental response selection and psychostimulant-induced euphoria (Koch et al., 2000). The D2R-labeled terminals that form excitatory-type synapses in the VTA may derive either from glutamatergic local neurons (Dobi et al., 2010) or glutamatergic inputs from other brain regions, specifically from the cerebral cortex (Geisler et al., 2007; Omelchenko and Sesack, 2007) or the mesopontine tegmentum (Charara et al., 1996; Parent et al., 1999) among others. Cholinergic terminals are also a recognized source of excitatory input to the VTA, which that might be modulated by D2R (Garzón et al., 1999; Omelchenko and Sesack, 2005).

D2R-labeled axon terminals also formed, albeit in a much lesser degree, symmetric synapses typical of those containing GABA (Torrealba and Müller, 1999). Inhibitory-type terminals may derive from local GABAergic interneurons (Steffensen et al., 1998; Omelchenko and Sesack, 2009) or from GABAergic neurons located in multiple structures, such as striatum, pallidum, periaqueductal gray, rostromedial tegmental nucleus or mesopontine tegmentum among others (Kalivas et al., 1993; Geisler and Zahm, 2005; Tripathi et al., 2010; Xia et al., 2011). The conclusion that GABA is present in some of the D2R-labeled terminals that contact dendrites is consistent with studies showing D2R-dependent regulation of GABAergic currents in VTA neurons (Michaeli and Yaka, 2010, 2011). This observation supports prior studies demonstrating presynaptic D2R-mediated inhibition of GABA release in this area through GIRK channel activation (Michaeli and Yaka, 2010). The expression of D2R in axon terminals that contact dendrites containing the α7nAChR is consistent with studies showing D2R-dependent regulation of GABAergic currents in cortical pyramidal cells (Trantham-Davidson et al., 2008).

We cannot exclude that some of the non-synaptic axon terminals that contain D2R, or both D2R and α7nAChR may have a synaptic specialization not seen in the plane of section, but those terminals may also belong substantially to axons that typically release non-synaptically their transmitters, such as those containing dopamine (Nirenberg et al., 1997; Turner, 2004), serotonin (Hervé et al., 1987; Levin and Rezvani, 2007), or acetylcholine (ACh) (Descarries et al., 1997; Garzón et al., 1999) neurons. These neuromodulators are often stored in axon terminals without recognizable synapses (Drenan et al., 2008; Millar and Harkness, 2008), and elicit many of their physiological effects by volume transmission, activating their respective receptors at a distance after diffusing through the extracellular space (Descarries and Mechawar, 2000; Fuxe et al., 2010).

Glial distribution of α7nAChR and D2R

Our results show that α7nAChR-labeled glial processes in the VTA are in contact with perisynaptic portions of dendrites containing α7nAChR, suggesting that α7nAChR activation in glia might modulate postsynaptic responses of adjacent α7nAChR-expressing dendrites to bound ligands by glial-neuronal coupling (Perea and Araque, 2005). Thus, signaling between neurons and astrocytes is a reciprocal communication within the conceptual framework of the tripartite synapse, where astrocytes not only respond to neuronal activity but also actively regulate neuronal and synaptic activity (Perea et al., 2009; Perea and Araque, 2010).

The present detection of α7nAChR alone or occasionally together with the D2R in perisynaptic glial processes in the VTA suggests that these receptors may play an important role in astrocytic uptake and clearance of glutamate and in the conversion of glutamate to glutamine, the substrate for neuronal synthesis of glutamate (Sharma and Vijayaraghavan, 2001; Oikawa et al., 2005; Patti et al., 2007). An increase in glial intracellular Ca2+ evokes glutamate release (Simard and Nedergaard, 2004), and also elicits glutamate-dependent currents in surrounding neurons (Pasti et al., 1997; Araque et al., 1998; Bezzi et al., 1998; Stigliani et al., 2006). Functional α7nAChR-mediated astrocytic current responses have been observed in acute slices of hippocampal CA1 region (Shen and Yakel, 2012), and α7nAChR activation produces glutamate release in cortical mice gliosomes (Patti et al., 2007). These observations, together with the known α7nAChR-mediated enhancement of intracellular Ca2+ in astrocytes, support the hypothesis that perisynaptic astrocytes expressing α7nAChR are critical modulators of neural transmission in the VTA. In contrast with α7nAChR, D2R immunolabeling was rarely seen alone, but more often co-expressed with α7nAChR and with S100B, an astrocytic marker whose release can be regulated through D2R activation (Nardin et al., 2011). The co-expression of α7nAChR and D2R in perisynaptic glia suggests that in vivo activation of both receptors may synergistically enhance intracellular Ca2+ levels, as has been shown in cultured astrocytes (Finkbeiner, 1993; Khan et al., 2001; Reuss and Unsicker, 2001; Oikawa et al., 2005).

Our demonstration of glial labeling for these receptors in mouse VTA is inconsistent with prior studies that failed to detect α-bungarotoxin binding for the α7nAChR (Jones and Wonnacott, 2004) or D2R immunolabeling in glial profiles in this region of rat VTA (Sesack et al., 1994). The apparent discrepancies may reflect either species or methodological differences as well as false positive or false negative results that are inherent to all immunocytochemical studies. Our belief in the authenticity of the glial labeling in our study is based on its absence in control tissue and identification using two visually distinct, immunogold and immunoperoxidase markers.

Implications

The present findings contribute to further understanding of the neurobiological cellular and subcellular bases for mutual integration of ACh- and DA-signaling in the VTA, which underlies reinforcement and cognition (Levin and Simon, 1998; Mark et al., 2011). They identify dendrites as major neuronal sites for convergent α7nAChR- and D2R-mediated effects on the postsynaptic excitability of VTA neurons. Our study also provides evidence that the presynaptic release of both excitatory and inhibitory transmitters is controlled in part through D2R in axon terminals that provide input to α7nAChR-labeled dendrites in this region. The scarcity of α7nAChR-labeled excitatory-type axon terminals and the observed localization of α7nAChR and/or D2R in many perisynaptic astrocytic profiles suggest the involvement of astrocytes in ACh- and/or DA-evoked changes in the synaptic availability of neurotransmitters in the VTA (Navarrete et al., 2012).

Our results have implications for understanding the therapeutic differential effectiveness as antipsychotic drugs of α7nAChR agonists and D2R antagonists. Beneficial effects of some atypical antipsychotics, such as clozapine, involve α7nAChR activation in the VTA (Schwieler and Erhardt, 2003). Clozapine normalizes sensory gating, a characteristic deficit in schizophrenia, in both human patients (Becker et al., 2004) and mice models (Simosky et al., 2003); and in mice this effect is selectively blocked by the α7nAChR antagonist α-bungarotoxin (Simosky et al., 2003). Furthermore, α7nAChR has been extensively implicated in cognitive processes, such as attention, learning and memory (for review see Leiser et al., 2009). In contrast with α7nAChR agonists, classical antipsychotic drugs block the D2R and are clinically effective in reducing positive psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia (Guillin et al., 2007). The mechanisms involved in this action definitely comprise a subcortical DA decline in which D2R targeting in the VTA causing DA inhibitory autoregulation could play a role, as well as actions in other regions (Goto and Grace, 2007). Our data suggest that the excitability of VTA neurons inclusive of those that express DA and D2R is highly influenced by α7nAChR activation. The prominent expression of the α7nAChR in VTA astrocytes suggests that these astrocytes may play a pivotal role in nicotine-induced enhancement of the activity of VTA neurons.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (1P01 HL096571, MH40342 and DA04600 to V.M.P.; DA011322 and DA021696 to K.M. and BFU2009-06991 to M.G. We are grateful to Drs. Veronica A. Alvarez and Julia Lemos at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism for the provision of brain tissue from MSN-D2R KO mice.

Abbreviations

ABC

Avidin–biotin complex

ACh

acetylcholine

α7nAChRs

alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

BSA

bovine serum albumin

D2R

dopamine D2 receptor

GIRK

G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium

MLA

methyllycaconitine

NAc

nucleus accumbens

nAChR

nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

NMDA

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

PB

phosphate buffer

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

TS

Tris-buffered saline

VTA

ventral tegmental area

References

  1. Ahn KC, Bernier BE, Harnett MT, Morikawa H. IP3 receptor sensitization during in vivo amphetamine experience enhances NMDA receptor plasticity in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 2010;30:6689–6699. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4453-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amantea D, Bowery NG. Reduced inhibitory action of a GABAB receptor agonist on [3H]-dopamine release from rat ventral tegmental area in vitro after chronic nicotine administration. BMC Pharmacol. 2004;4:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2210-4-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Araque A, Parpura V, Sanzgiri R, Haydon P. Glutamate-dependent astrocyte modulation of synaptic transmission between cultured hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:2129–2142. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnaiz-Cot J, Gonzalez J, Sobrado M, Baldelli P, Carbone E, Gandia L, Garcia A, Hernandez-Guijo J. Allosteric modulation of alpha 7 nicotinic receptors selectively depolarizes hippocampal interneurons, enhancing spontaneous GABAergic transmission. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:1097–1110. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aronin N, DiFiglia M. The subcellular localization of the G-protein Gi alpha in the basal ganglia reveals its potential role in both signal transduction and vesicle trafficking. J Neurosci. 1992;12:3435–3444. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03435.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Azam L, Winzer-Serhan UH, Chen Y, Leslie FM. Expression of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNAs within midbrain dopamine neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2002;444:260–274. doi: 10.1002/cne.10138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balfour DJ. The neuronal pathways mediating the behavioral and addictive properties of nicotine. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;192:209–233. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baudier J, Glasser N, Gerard D. Ions binding to S100 proteins. I. Calcium- and zinc-binding properties of bovine brain S100 alpha alpha, S100a (alpha beta), and S100b (beta beta) protein: Zn2+ regulates Ca2+ binding on S100b protein. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:8192–8203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker J, Gomes I, Ghisolfi ES, Schush A, Ramos FL, Ehlers JA, Nora DB, Lara DR, da Costa JC. Clozapine, but not typical antipsychotics, correct P50 suppression deficit in patients with schizophrenia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckstead MJ, Grandy DK, Wickman K, Williams JT. Vesicular dopamine release elicits an inhibitory postsynaptic current in midbrain dopamine neurons. Neuron. 2004;42:939–946. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bellone C, Lüscher C. Cocaine triggered AMPA receptor redistribution is reversed in vivo by mGluR-dependent long-term depression. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:636–641. doi: 10.1038/nn1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bezzi P, Carmignoto G, Pasti L, Vesce S, Rossi D, Rizzini B, Pozzan T, Volterra A. Prostaglandins stimulate calcium-dependent glutamate release in astrocytes. Nature. 1998;391:281–285. doi: 10.1038/34651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brana C, Aubert I, Charron G, Pellevoisin C, Bloch B. Ontogeny of the striatal neurons expressing the D2 dopamine receptor in humans: an in situ hybridization and receptor-binding study. Mol Brain Res. 1997;48:389–400. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00114-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Calabresi P, Lacey MG, North RA. Nicotinic excitation of rat ventral tegmental neurones in vitro studied by intracellular recording. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;98:135–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb16873.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Castagna C, Viglietti-Panzica C, Carlo Panzica G. Protein S100 immunoreactivity in glial cells and neurons of the Japanese quail brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2003;25:195–212. doi: 10.1016/s0891-0618(03)00009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Centeno M, Henderson J, Pau K, Bethea C. Estradiol increases alpha7 nicotinic receptor in serotonergic dorsal raphe and noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons of macaques. J Comp Neurol. 2006;497:489–501. doi: 10.1002/cne.21026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chan J, Aoki C, Pickel VM. Optimization of differential immunogold–silver and peroxidase labeling with maintenance of ultrastructure in brain sections before plastic embedding. J Neurosci Methods. 1990;33:113–127. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90015-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Charara A, Smith Y, Parent A. Glutamatergic inputs from the pedunculopontine nucleus to midbrain dopaminergic neurons in primates: Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin anterograde labeling combined with postembedding glutamate and GABA immunohistochemistry. J Comp Neurol. 1996;364:254–266. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960108)364:2<254::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Charpantier E, Barneoud P, Moser P, Besnard F, Sgard F. Nicotinic acetylcholine subunit mRNA expression in dopaminergic neurons of the rat substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area. Neuroreport. 1998;9:3097–3101. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199809140-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Collins A, Salminen O, Marks M, Whiteaker P, Grady S. The road to discovery of neuronal nicotinic cholinergic receptor subtypes. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009:85–112. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Corrigall WA, Franklin KB, Coen KM, Clarke PB. The mesolimbic dopaminergic system is implicated in the reinforcing effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;107:285–289. doi: 10.1007/BF02245149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cruz HG, Ivanova T, Lunn ML, Stoffel M, Slesinger PA, Lüscher C. Bi-directional effects of GABA(B) receptor agonists on the mesolimbic dopamine system. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:153–159. doi: 10.1038/nn1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Descarries L, Gisiger V, Steriade M. Diffuse transmission by acetylcholine in the CNS. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;53:603–625. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Descarries L, Mechawar N. Ultrastructural evidence for diffuse transmission by monoamine and acetylcholine neurons of the central nervous system. Prog Brain Res. 2000;125:27–47. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)25005-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Di Chiara G. Role of dopamine in the behavioural actions of nicotine related to addiction. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;393:295–314. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00122-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dobi A, Margolis EB, Wang HL, Harvey BK, Morales M. Glutamatergic and nonglutamatergic neurons of the ventral tegmental area establish local synaptic contacts with dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2010;30:218–229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3884-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dominguez del Toro E, Juiz J, Peng X, Lindstrom J, Criado M. Immunocytochemical localization of the a7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 1994;349:325–342. doi: 10.1002/cne.903490302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Drenan RM, Nashmi R, Imoukhuede P, Just H, McKinney S, Lester HA. Subcellular trafficking, pentameric assembly, and subunit stoichiometry of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing fluorescently labeled alpha6 and beta3 subunits. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73:27–41. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.039180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Duffy AM, Fitzgerald ML, Chan J, Robinson DC, Milner TA, Mackie K, Pickel VM. Acetylcholine α7 nicotinic and dopamine D2 receptors are targeted to many of the same postsynaptic dendrites and astrocytes in the rodent prefrontal cortex. Synapse. 2011;65:1350–1367. doi: 10.1002/syn.20977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Duffy A, Zhou P, Milner TA, Pickel VM. Spatial and intracellular relationships between the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the vesicular acetylcholine transporter in the prefrontal cortex of rat and mouse. Neuroscience. 2009;161:1091–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fabian-Fine R, Skehel P, Errington M, Davies H, Sher E, Stewart M, Fine A. Ultrastructural distribution of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7993–8003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-07993.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Finkbeiner S. Glial calcium. Glia. 1993;9:83–104. doi: 10.1002/glia.440090202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fisher J, Dani J. Nicotinic receptors on hippocampal cultures can increase synaptic glutamate currents while decreasing the NMDA-receptor component. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:2756–2769. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Free R, Hazelwood L, Cabrera D, Spalding H, Namkung Y, Rankin M, Sibley D. D1 and D2 dopamine receptor expression is regulated by direct interaction with the chaperone protein calnexin. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:21285–21300. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701555200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Freedman R, Coon H, Myles-Worsley M, Orr-Urtreger A, Olincy A, Davis A, Polymeropoulos M, Holik J, Hopkins J, Hoff M, Rosenthal J, Waldo M, Reimherr F, Wender P, Yaw J, Young D, Breese C, Adams C, Patterson D, Adler L, Kruglyak L, Leonard S, Byerley W. Linkage of a neurophysiological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:587–592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.2.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fuxe K, Dahlstrom A, Jonsson G, Marcellino D, Guescini M, Dam M, Manger P, Agnati L. The discovery of central monoamine neurons gave volume transmission to the wired brain. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;90:82–100. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gao M, Jin Y, Yang K, Zhang D, Lukas RJ, Wu J. Mechanisms involved in systemic nicotine-induced glutamatergic synaptic plasticity on dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 2010;30:13814–13825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1943-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Garzón M, Pickel VM. Subcellular distribution of M2 muscarinic receptors in relation to dopaminergic neurons of the rat ventral tegmental area. J Comp Neurol. 2006;498:821–839. doi: 10.1002/cne.21082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Garzón M, Vaughan RA, Uhl GR, Kuhar MJ, Pickel VM. Cholinergic axon terminals in the ventral tegmental area target a subpopulation of neurons expressing low levels of the dopamine transporter. J Comp Neurol. 1999;410:197–210. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990726)410:2<197::aid-cne3>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Geetha T, Wooten MW. TrkA receptor endolysosomal degradation is both ubiquitin and proteasome dependent. Traffic. 2008;9:1146–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Geisler S, Zahm DS. Afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat-anatomical substratum for integrative functions. J Comp Neurol. 2005;490:270–294. doi: 10.1002/cne.20668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Geisler S, Derst C, Veh RW, Zahm DS. Glutamatergic afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5730–5743. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0012-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gelman MS, Chang W, Thomas DY, Bergeron JJ, Prives JM. Role of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone calnexin in subunit folding and assembly of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:15085–15092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.25.15085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Good C, Lupica C. Properties of distinct ventral tegmental area synapses activated via pedunculopontine or ventral tegmental area stimulation in vitro. J Physiol. 2009;587:1233–1247. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.164194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Goto Y, Grace AA. The dopamine system and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: a basic science perspective. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007;78:41–68. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(06)78002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gray EG. Axosomatic and axo-dendritic synapses of the cerebral cortex: an electron microscopic study. J Anat. 1959;93:420–433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Green WN, Millar NS. Ion-channel assembly. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:280–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Grenhoff J, Aston-Jones G, Svensson TH. Nicotinic effects on the firing pattern of midbrain dopamine neurons. Acta Physiol Scand. 1986;128:351–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1986.tb07988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grillner P, Svensson TH. Nicotine-induced excitation of midbrain dopamine neurons in vitro involves ionotropic glutamate receptor activation. Synapse. 2000;38:1–9. doi: 10.1002/1098-2396(200010)38:1<1::AID-SYN1>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Guillin O, Abi-Dargham A, Laruelle M. Neurobiology of dopamine in schizophrenia. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007;78:1–39. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(06)78001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Haber S, Ryoo H, Cox C, Lu W. Subsets of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in monkeys are distinguished by different levels of mRNA for the dopamine transporter: comparison with the mRNA for the D2 receptor, tyrosine hydroxylase and calbindin immunoreactivity. J Comp Neurol. 1995;362:400–410. doi: 10.1002/cne.903620308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hara Y, Yakovleva T, Bakalkin G, Pickel V. Dopamine D1 receptors have subcellular distributions conducive to interactions with prodynorphin in the rat nucleus accumbens shell. Synapse. 2006;60:1–19. doi: 10.1002/syn.20273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hervé D, Pickel VM, Joh TH, Beaudet A. Serotonin axon terminals in the ventral tegmental area of the rat: fine structure and synaptic input to dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res. 1987;435:71–83. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91588-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. The use of avidin–biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase technique: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (peroxidase) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981;29:577–599. doi: 10.1177/29.4.6166661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hurd YL, Pristupa ZB, Herman MM, Niznik HB, Kleinman JE. The dopamine transporter and dopamine D2 receptor messenger RNAs are differentially expressed in limbic- and motor-related subpopulations of human mesencephalic neurons. Neuroscience. 1994;63:357–362. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90535-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jin Y, Yang K, Wang H, Wu J. Exposure of nicotine to ventral tegmental area slices induces glutamatergic synaptic plasticity on dopamine neurons. Synapse. 2011;65:332–338. doi: 10.1002/syn.20850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jones I, Wonnacott S. Precise localization of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on glutamatergic axon terminals in the rat ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 2004;24:11244–11252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3009-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Johnson SW, North RA. Two types of neurone in the rat ventral tegmental area and their synaptic inputs. J Physiol. 1992;450:455–468. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kabbani N, Woll MP, Levenson R, Lindstrom JM, Changeux JP. Intracellular complexes of the beta2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in brain identified by proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:20570–20575. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710314104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kalivas PW, Churchill L, Klitenick MA. GABA and enkephalin projection from the nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum to the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience. 1993;57:1047–1060. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90048-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kaplan AR, Doyle T, Casey E, Free RB, Sibley DR, Rubenstein M, Alvarez VA. Distinct roles of dopamine D2 receptors in dorsal and ventral striatum on motor and drug-related behaviors. Society for Neuroscience Abstract 42nd Annual Meeting; New Orleans, LA. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kearn C, Blake-Palmer K, Daniel E, Mackie K, Glass M. Concurrent stimulation of cannabinoid CB1 and dopamine D2 receptors enhances heterodimer formation: a mechanism for receptor cross-talk? Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67:1697–1704. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.006882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Keller SH, Lindstrom J, Ellisman M, Taylor P. Adjacent basic amino acid residues recognized by the COP I complex and ubiquitination govern endoplasmic reticulum to cell surface trafficking of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:18384–18391. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100691200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Khan Z, Koulen P, Rubinstein M, Grandy D, Goldman-Rakic P. An astroglia-linked dopamine D2-receptor action in prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1964–1969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kim O, Ariano M, Namkung Y, Marinec P, Kim E, Han J, Sibley D. D2 dopamine receptor expression and trafficking is regulated through direct interactions with ZIP. J Neurochem. 2008;106:83–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05348.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kitai ST, Shepard PD, Callaway JC, Scroggs R. Afferent modulation of dopamine neuron firing patterns. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:690–697. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Klink R, d’Exaerde de Kerchove A, Zoli M, Changeux JP. Molecular and physiological diversity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the midbrain dopaminergic nuclei. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1452–1463. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01452.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Koch M, Schmid A, Schnitzler HU. Role of nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in instrumental and Pavlovian paradigms of conditioned reward. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000;152:67–73. doi: 10.1007/s002130000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Koga E, Momiyama T. Presynaptic dopamine D2-like receptors inhibit excitatory transmission onto rat ventral tegmental dopaminergic neurones. J Physiol. 2000;523:163–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-2-00163.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Labouèbe G, Lomazzi M, Cruz HG, Creton C, Luján R, Li M, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, Watanabe M, Wickman K, Boyer SB, Slesinger PA, Lüscher C. RGS2 modulates coupling between GABAB receptors and GIRK channels in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1559–1568. doi: 10.1038/nn2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lacey MC, Mercuri NB, North RA. Dopamine acts on D2 receptors to increase potassium conductance in neurons of the rat substantia nigra zona compacta. J Physiol (Lond) 1987;392:397–416. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Laviolette SR, van der Kooy D. The motivational valence of nicotine in the rat ventral tegmental area is switched from rewarding to aversive following blockade of the a7-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Psychopharmacology. 2003;166:306–313. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1317-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Leiser SC, Bowlby MR, Comery TA, Dunlop J. A cog in cognition: how the alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is geared towards improving cognitive deficits. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;122:302–311. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Leranth C, Pickel VM. Electron microscopic pre-embedding double immunostaining methods. In: Heimer L, Zaborszky L, editors. Neuroanatomical tract-tracing methods 2: Recent progress. New York: Plenum Publishing Co; 1989. pp. 129–172. [Google Scholar]
  75. Levin E, Rezvani A. Nicotinic interactions with antipsychotic drugs, models of schizophrenia and impacts on cognitive function. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;74:1182–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Levin E, Simon B. Nicotinic acetylcholine involvement in cognitive function in animals. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998;138:217–230. doi: 10.1007/s002130050667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Levy R, Aoki C. Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors occur at postsynaptic densities of AMPA receptor-positive and -negative excitatory synapses in rat sensory cortex. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5001–5015. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-12-05001.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li W, Doyon WM, Dani JA. Quantitative unit classification of ventral tegmental area neurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:2808–2820. doi: 10.1152/jn.00575.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Mameli-Engvall M, Evrard A, Pons S, Maskos U, Svensson TH, Changeux JP, Faure P. Hierarchical control of dopamine neuron-firing patterns by nicotinic receptors. Neuron. 2006;50:911–921. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mansvelder HD, McGehee DS. Long-term potentiation of excitatory inputs to brain reward areas by nicotine. Neuron. 2000;27:349–357. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Mao D, Gallagher K, McGehee DS. Nicotine potentiation of excitatory inputs to ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6710–6720. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5671-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mark GP, Shabani S, Dobbs LK, Hansen ST. Cholinergic modulation of mesolimbic dopamine function and reward. Physiol Behav. 2011;104:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Markou A, Paterson NE. The nicotinic antagonist methyllycaconitine has differential effects on nicotine self-administration and nicotine withdrawal in the rat. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001;3:361–373. doi: 10.1080/14622200110073380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Martina M, Bergeron R. D1 and D4 dopaminergic receptor interplay mediates coincident G protein-independent and dependent regulation of glutamate NMDA receptors in the lateral amygdala. J Neurochem. 2008;106:2421–2435. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05584.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. McLane K, Wu X, Lindstrom J, Conti-Tronconi B. Epitope mapping of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against two alpha-bungarotoxin-binding alpha subunits from neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Neuroimmunol. 1992;38:115–128. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(92)90096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Meador-Woodruff J, Mansour A, Healy D, Kuehn R, Zhou Q, Bunzow J, Akil H, Civelli O, Watson S., Jr Comparison of the distributions of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor mRNAs in rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1991;5:231–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mercuri NB, Saiardi A, Bonci A, Picetti R, Calabresi P, Bernardi G, Borrelli E. Loss of autoreceptor function in dopaminergic neurons from dopamine D2 receptor deficient mice. Neuroscience. 1997;79:323–327. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00135-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mereu G, Yoon K-WP, Boi V, Gessa GL, Naes L, Westfall TC. Preferential stimulation of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons by nicotine. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987;141:395–399. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90556-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Michaeli A, Yaka R. Dopamine inhibits GABA(A) currents in ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons via activation of presynaptic G-protein coupled inwardly-rectifying potassium channels. Neuroscience. 2010;165:1159–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Michaeli A, Yaka R. Dopamine-related drugs act presynaptically to potentiate GABA(A) receptor currents in VTA dopamine neurons. Neuropharmacology. 2011;61:234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Millar NS, Harkness PC. Assembly and trafficking of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Review) Mol Membr Biol. 2008;25:279–292. doi: 10.1080/09687680802035675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Missale C, Nash S, Robinson S, Jaber M, Caron M. Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev. 1998;78:189–225. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Nardin P, Tramontina AC, Quincozes-Santos A, Tortorelli LS, Lunardi P, Klein PR, Wartchow KM, Bobermin LD, Gottfried C, Elisabetsky E, Goncalves CA. In vitro S100B secretion is reduced by apomorphine: effects of antipsychotics and antioxidants. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35:1291–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Navarrete M, Perea G, Fernandez de Sevilla D, Gómez-Gonzalo M, Núñez A, Martín ED, Araque A. Astrocytes mediate in vivo cholinergic-induced synaptic plasticity. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(2):e1001259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Nimitvilai S, Brodie MS. Reversal of prolonged dopamine inhibition of dopaminergic neurons of the ventral tegmental area. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;333:555–563. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.163931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Nirenberg MJ, Chan J, Vaughan RA, Uhl GR, Kuhar MJ, Pickel VM. Immunogold localization of the dopamine transporter: an ultrastructural study of the rat ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5255–5262. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05255.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Oikawa H, Nakamichi N, Kambe Y, Ogura M, Yoneda Y. An increase in intracellular free calcium ions by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in a single cultured rat cortical astrocyte. J Neurosci Res. 2005;79:535–544. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Olincy A, Freedman R. Nicotinic mechanisms in the treatment of psychotic disorders: a focus on the alpha7 nicotinic receptor. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2012:211–232. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25758-2_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Olincy A, Harris J, Johnson L, Pender V, Kongs S, Allensworth D, Ellis J, Zerbe G, Leonard S, Stevens K, Stevens J, Martin L, Adler L, Soti F, Kem W, Freedman R. Proof-of-concept trial of an alpha7 nicotinic agonist in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:630–638. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Omelchenko N, Sesack SR. Laterodorsal tegmental projections to identified cell populations in the rat ventral tegmental area. J Comp Neurol. 2005;483:217–235. doi: 10.1002/cne.20417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Omelchenko N, Sesack SR. Glutamate synaptic inputs to ventral tegmental area neurons in the rat derive primarily from subcortical sources. Neuroscience. 2007;146:1259–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Omelchenko N, Sesack SR. Ultrastructural analysis of local collaterals of rat ventral tegmental area neurons: GABA phenotype and synapses onto dopamine and GABA cells. Synapse. 2009;63:895–906. doi: 10.1002/syn.20668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Orr-Urtreger A, Göldner FM, Saeki M, Lorenzo I, Goldberg L, De Biasi M, Dani JA, Patrick JW, Beaudet AL. Mice deficient in the alpha7 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor lack alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites and hippocampal fast nicotinic currents. J Neurosci. 1997;17:9165–9171. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-23-09165.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Panagis G, Kastellakis A, Spyraki C, Nomikos G. Effects of methyllycaconitine (MLA), an a7 nicotinic receptor antagonist, on nicotine- and cocaine-induced potentiation of brain stimulation reward. Psychopharmacology. 2000;149:388–396. doi: 10.1007/s002130000384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Parent A, Parent M, Charara A. Glutamatergic inputs to midbrain dopaminergic neurons in primates. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 1999;5:193–201. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(99)00037-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Pasti L, Volterra A, Pozzan T, Carmignoto G. Intracellular calcium oscillations in astrocytes: a highly plastic, bidirectional form of communication between neurons and astrocytes in situ. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7817–7830. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-20-07817.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Patti L, Raiteri L, Grilli M, Zappettini S, Bonanno G, Marchi M. Evidence that alpha7 nicotinic receptor modulates glutamate release from mouse neocortical gliosomes. Neurochem Int. 2007;51:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  109. Perea G, Araque A. Glial calcium signaling and neuron–glia communication. Cell Calcium. 2005;38:375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Perea G, Araque A. Glia modulates synaptic transmission. Brain Res Rev. 2010;63:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Perea G, Navarrete M, Araque A. Tripartite synapses: astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32:421–431. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Peters A, Palay S, Webster H. The fine structure of the nervous system. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  113. Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Rimondini R, Lena C, Marubio LM, Pich EM, Fuxe K, Changeux JP. Acetylcholine receptors containing the beta2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature. 1998;391:173–177. doi: 10.1038/34413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Pickel VM, Chan J, Kearn C, Mackie K. Targeting dopamine D2 and cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptors in rat nucleus accumbens. J Comp Neurol. 2006;495:299–313. doi: 10.1002/cne.20881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Pickel VM, Chan J, Nirenberg MJ. Region-specific targeting of dopamine D2-receptors and somatodendritic vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) within ventral tegmental area subdivisions. Synapse. 2002;45:113–124. doi: 10.1002/syn.10092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Pidoplichko VI, DeBiasi M, Williams JT, Dani JA. Nicotine activates and desensitizes midbrain dopamine neurons. Nature. 1997;390:401–404. doi: 10.1038/37120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Piper RC, Katzmann DJ. Biogenesis and function of multivesicular bodies. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007;23:519–547. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Prou D, Gu WJ, Le Crom S, Vincent JD, Salamero J, Vernier P. Intracellular retention of the two isoforms of the D(2) dopamine receptor promotes endoplasmic reticulum disruption. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:3517–3527. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.19.3517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Reuss B, Unsicker K. Atypical neuroleptic drugs downregulate dopamine sensitivity in rat cortical and striatal astrocytes. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001;18:197–209. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2001.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963;17:208. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Rezvani K, Teng Y, De Biasi M. The ubiquitin–proteasome system regulates the stability of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Mol Neurosci. 2010;40:177–184. doi: 10.1007/s12031-009-9272-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Saal D, Dong Y, Bonci A, Malenka RC. Drugs of abuse and stress trigger a common synaptic adaptation in dopamine neurons. Neuron. 2003;37:577–582. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Schilström B, De Villiers S, Malmerfelt A, Svensson TH, Nomikos GG. Nicotine-induced Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens and the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat: role of nicotinic and NMDA receptors in the ventral tegmental area. Synapse. 2000;36:314–321. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(20000615)36:4<314::AID-SYN8>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Schilström B, Nomikos GG, Nisell M, Hertel P, Svensson TH. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism in the ventral tegmental area diminishes the systemic nicotine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience. 1998;82:781–789. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Schilström B, Rawal N, Mameli-Engvall M, Nomikos GG, Svensson TH. Dual effects of nicotine on dopamine neurons mediated by different nicotinic receptor subtypes. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;6:1–11. doi: 10.1017/S1461145702003188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Schoepfer R, Conroy W, Whiting P, Gore M, Lindstrom J. Brain alpha-bungarotoxin binding protein cDNAs and MAbs reveal subtypes of this branch of the ligand-gated ion channel gene superfamily. Neuron. 1990;5:35–48. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90031-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Schwieler L, Erhardt S. Inhibitory action of clozapine on rat ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons following increased levels of endogenous kynurenic acid. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:1770–1777. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Seguela P, Wadiche J, Dineley-Miller K, Dani JA, Patrick JW. Molecular cloning, functional properties, and distribution of rat brain-a7. A nicotinic cation channel highly permeable to calcium. J Neurosci. 1993;13:596–604. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-02-00596.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Sesack SR, Aoki C, Pickel VM. Ultrastructural localization of D2 receptor-like immunoreactivity in midbrain dopamine neurons and their striatal targets. J Neurosci. 1994;14:88–106. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-01-00088.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Severance E, Yolken R. Novel alpha7 nicotinic receptor isoforms and deficient cholinergic transcription in schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav. 2008;7:37–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Sharma G, Vijayaraghavan S. Nicotinic cholinergic signaling in hippocampal astrocytes involves calcium-induced calcium release from intracellular stores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4148–4153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071540198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Shen JX, Yakel JL. Functional α7 nicotinic ACh receptors on astrocytes in rat hippocampal CA1 slices. J Mol Neurosci. 2012;48:14–21. doi: 10.1007/s12031-012-9719-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Simard M, Nedergaard M. The neurobiology of glia in the context of water and ion homeostasis. Neuroscience. 2004;129:877–896. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Simosky JK, Stevens KE, Adler LE, Freedman R. Clozapine improves deficient inhibitory auditory processing in DBA/2 mice, via a nicotinic cholinergic mechanism. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2003;165:386–396. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1285-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Steffensen SC, Svingos AL, Pickel VM, Henriksen SJ. Electrophysiological characterization of GABAergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8003–8015. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-19-08003.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Stewart DW, Vinci C, Adams CE, Cohen AS, Copeland AL. Smoking topography and outcome expectancies among individuals with schizotypy. Psychiatry Res. 2013;205:205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Stigliani S, Zappettini S, Raiteri L, Passalacqua M, Melloni E, Venturi C, Tacchetti C, Diaspro A, Usai C, Bonanno G. Glia resealed particles freshly prepared from adult rat brain are competent for exocytotic release of glutamate. J Neurochem. 2006;96:656–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Sun X, Zhao Y, Wolf M. Dopamine receptor stimulation modulates AMPA receptor synaptic insertion in prefrontal cortex neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7342–7351. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4603-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Sziraki I, Sershen H, Hashim A, Lajtha A. Receptors in the ventral tegmental area mediating nicotine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Neurochem Res. 2002;27:253–261. doi: 10.1023/a:1014844823534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Thomas MJ, Malenka RC, Bonci A. Modulation of long-term depression by dopamine in the mesolimbic system. J Neurosci. 2000;20:5581–5586. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05581.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Torrealba F, Müller C. Ultrastructure of glutamate and GABA immunoreactive axon terminals of the rat nucleus tractus solitarius, with a note on infralimbic cortex afferents. Brain Res. 1999;820:20–30. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01326-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Trantham-Davidson H, Kroner S, Seamans JK. Dopamine modulation of prefrontal cortex interneurons occurs independently of DARPP-32. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:951–958. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Tripathi A, Prensa L, Cebrián C, Mengual E. Axonal branching patterns of nucleus accumbens neurons in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:4649–4673. doi: 10.1002/cne.22484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Turner T. Nicotine enhancement of dopamine release by a calcium-dependent increase in the size of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. J Neurosci. 2004;24:11328–11336. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1559-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wanamaker CP, Green WN. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperones stabilize nicotinic receptor subunits and regulate receptor assembly. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:31113–31123. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705369200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Wang H, Cuzon V, Pickel VM. Postnatal development of mu-opioid receptors in the rat caudate-putamen nucleus parallels asymmetric synapse formation. Neuroscience. 2003;118:695–708. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00926-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Wooltorton JR, Pidoplichko VI, Broide RS, Dani JA. Differential desensitization and distribution of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in midbrain dopamine areas. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3176–3185. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03176.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wu J, George AA, Schroeder KM, Xu L, Marxer-Miller S, Lucero L, Lukas RJ. Electrophysiological, pharmacological, and molecular evidence for a7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat midbrain dopamine neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;311:80–91. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.070417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wylie KP, Rojas DC, Tanabe J, Martin LF, Tregellas JR. Nicotine increases brain functional network efficiency. Neuroimage. 2012;63:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Xia Y, Driscoll JR, Wilbrecht L, Margolis EB, Fields HL, Hjelmstad GO. Nucleus accumbens medium spiny neurons target non-dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 2011;31:7811–7816. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1504-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Yang K, Hu J, Lucero L, Liu Q, Zheng C, Zhen X, Jin G, Lukas RJ, Wu J. Distinctive nicotinic acetylcholine receptor functional phenotypes of rat ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons. J Physiol. 2009;587:345–361. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.162743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhang J, Berg DK. Reversible inhibition of GABAA receptors by alpha7-containing nicotinic receptors on the vertebrate postsynaptic neurons. J Physiol. 2007;579:753–763. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zhang XY, Chen DC, Xiu MH, Haile CN, He SC, Luo X, Zuo L, Rosenheck R, Kosten TA, Kosten TR. Cigarette smoking, psychopathology and cognitive function in first-episode drug-naive patients with schizophrenia: a case–control study. Psychol Med. 2012:1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES