Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2014 Jan 26;16(7):975–983. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not309

Incidence and survival of children with central nervous system primitive tumors in the French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors

Emmanuel Desandes 1, Sandra Guissou 1, Pascal Chastagner 1, Brigitte Lacour 1
PMCID: PMC4057137  PMID: 24470548

Abstract

Background

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the second most common childhood malignancy. The French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors (NRCST) makes it possible to describe this variety of distinct tumor types and to provide incidence and survival data in France on a nationwide basis.

Methods

All children aged 0–14 years, who were registered with a primary CNS tumor in the NRCST of France between 2000 and 2008, were identified. Tumors were classified according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition.

Results

Approximately 57% of pediatric CNS tumors were gliomas, with astrocytomas of the pilocytic type predominating. Distributions of subtypes by age showed that primitive neuroectodermal tumors and ependymomas mainly occurred in children aged <5 years. The mean annual incidence rate of CNS tumors was 39 per million. No statistically significant change in time trends of incidence rate was observed during 2000–2008. For all tumors combined, overall survival was 84.8% (95% CI, 83.7%–85.9%) at 1 year and 72.9% (95% CI, 71.5%–74.3%) at 5 years. Survival time trends were studied in a multivariate analysis observing a reduction in the risk of death in periods of diagnosis 2003–2005 (HR = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7–0.9) and 2006–2008 (HR = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6–0.9) compared with 2000–2002.

Conclusions

The stable incidence rates during the last 10 years could indicate that major changes in environmental risk factors are unlikely, but the ongoing need for population-based surveillance remains relevant. Results indicate a positive trend in the survival probability still persistent in the 2000s.

Keywords: children, CNS tumor, incidence, population-based study, survival


In France, as in other developed countries, primary tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) represent the second most frequent neoplasm after leukemia and the leading cause of cancer-related death in childhood. They account for ∼25% of malignancies in children <15 years of age at diagnosis.1 This group of tumors, however, cannot be considered as a single entity because it is composed of different diagnostic categories, the largest being astrocytomas, ependymomas, central primitive neuroectodermal tumors (cPNETs, including medulloblastomas), and other gliomas.2 In line with the third version of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer (ICCC-3),3 the CNS tumors include tumors of cranial and paraspinal nerves. Intracranial tumors account for ∼90% of all CNS tumors in children. The proportion of cases without histological confirmation of diagnosis is larger than that of other childhood cancers. In our previous study, the diagnosis was documented by cytology/histology in 86% of CNS tumor cases versus 94% of all cancer cases.1 Contrary to the general rule of cancer registry recommendations, some nonmalignant neoplasms are also included in the CNS group because it is difficult to establish a borderline between benign and malignant neoplasms in the case of ependymomas, some gliomas, and miscellaneous or unspecified intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms.3 Many cancer registries routinely include nonmalignant CNS tumors.

We report incidence and survival analyses from the French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, in which the CNS tumors have been classified according to the ICCC-3.3

Materials and Methods

Population Covered

We identified children with a diagnosis of CNS tumor who were registered in the French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, a population-based tumor registry containing data on mainland France. Population data were provided by the French Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies for each year until 2008. The number of births increased slightly until 2002, and the child population was rather stable over that period, varying overall from 11 113 855 children aged <15 years in 2000 to 11 369 876 children in 2008. For a given year, person-years were computed by years of age and sex as the mean of the populations in each year and the next year.

Case Registration

All cases of children (aged 0–14 years) with CNS tumors diagnosed in mainland France between 2000 and 2008 are included. In line with the recommendations of the European Network of Cancer Registries4 and the ICCC-3,3 benign or borderline tumors of CNS are also recorded. According to the third edition of the International Classification of Disease – Oncology (ICDO-3),5 a CNS tumor is defined as a lesion with the following topography code: C70.0-9, C71.0-9, C72.0-9, and C75.1-3. Lacour et al.1 have previously described the methodology of case registration for the French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors.

Data Collection

The registration form includes identification data (first and last names, sex, date and place of birth, address at diagnosis), diagnostic data (incidence date, basis of diagnosis, method of first detection, site of primary tumor, histological type, immunophenotype and genetics, metastasis at diagnosis, laterality, histological grade according to the WHO grading system), patient pathway from diagnosis to treatment, initial treatment (date of treatment initiation, cancer treatment type), vital status, and last contact date. The diagnoses are coded using the ICDO-35 and further grouped using the ICCC-3.3 The diagnosis of CNS tumors could be fortuitous, related to the exploration of symptoms, or related to the surveillance of predisposing conditions (such as neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis, etc.) regardless of whether the patients underwent treatment or not. Vital status was obtained at the time of analysis by actively searching in medical records and by matching the French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors files and the central population register (RNIPP) sorted by date and place of birth to obtain the mention of death and the date of death.

Data Analysis

All data were retrieved, tabulated by tumor type, and categorized using the ICCC-3 levels: 12 main diagnostic groups, 47 diagnostic subgroups, and 2–11 divisions of selected subgroups.3 The incidence rates (IRs) were calculated for the 9-year period 2000–2008 and were based on person-years derived from the Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies’ annual estimates of population by age and sex. Crude and age-specific IRs were calculated, and age-standardized rates were estimated by the direct method using the world population for the age groups under 15 years.6 Cumulative rates, defined as the sum of the age specific IRs over each year of age from 0 to 14 years, were also calculated.6 Time trend in the incidence was estimated by the conventional annual percent change calculated as the slope of the linear regression used to model the natural logarithm of the IRs as a function of the calendar year.7 Median length of follow-up was calculated using the inverse Kaplan–Meier method.8 Survival analysis was performed on a dataset containing all cases diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008, and followed up until October 1, 2011. The probability of overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.9 The endpoint of interest was death from any cause for OS, with the date of diagnosis acting as the time origin. Survival curves between groups were compared using the log-rank test,10 and the trend in survival over time periods was estimated using the log-rank test for trend.11 The risks of death according to age, sex, grade, stage, and period were estimated by hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using Cox proportional hazards regression models.12 Reference categories were selected logically as the first category (benign tumor, not metastatic, low-grade/WHOI-II, and period 2000–2002) or as the modal category (1–4-year age group), or arbitrarily (boys, infratentorial brain). Statistical tests were 2-sided with a significance level of 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute).

Results

Population Description

Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008, there were 3 886 children (2 118 boys and 1 768 girls) younger than aged 15 years diagnosed with a CNS tumor in France. The most common CNS tumors were pilocytic astrocytomas (21.8%), followed by medulloblastomas (13.7%), other astrocytic tumors (13.0%), unspecified malignant gliomas (6.8%), and ependymomas (6.5%). The more detailed diagnostic subgroups are described by age group in Table 1.

Table 1.

Distribution of CNS tumor histologic types by age group (French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, 2000–2008)

Histologic types according to the ICDO-35 <1 year
1–4 years
5–9 years
10–14 years
n % n % n % n %
Pilocytic astrocytomas (M9421) 38 13.4 268 22.3 294 23.3 248 21.7
Other astrocytomas (M9384,M9400–4411, M9420, M9423-9424) 11 3.9 60 5.0 77 6.1 81 7.1
Malignant gliomas (M9380, M9381, M9430, M9444) 37 13.0 203 17.0 150 11.9 85 7.5
Glioblastomas (M9440-9442) 3 1.1 8 0.7 27 2.1 27 2.4
Mixed gliomas (M9382) 3 1.1 14 1.2 27 2.1 22 1.9
Oligodendrogliomas (M9450, M9451) 8 2.8 36 3.0 55 4.4 63 5.5
Medulloblastomas (M9470-9472, M9474) 31 10.9 162 13.5 215 17.0 125 10.9
Central primitive neuroectodermal tumors (M9473) 7 2.5 47 3.9 33 2.6 22 1.9
Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (M9508) 29 10.2 55 4.6 9 0.7 4 0.4
Ependymomas (M9383, M9391-9394) 17 6.0 110 9.2 71 5.6 53 4.6
Choroid plexus tumors (M9390) 35 12.3 51 4.3 10 0.8 11 1.0
Germ cell tumors (M9060-9105) 20 7.0 44 3.7 45 3.6 111 9.7
Craniopharyngiomas (M9350-9352) 2 0.7 39 3.3 87 6.9 56 4.9
Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (M9413) 7 2.4 28 2.3 51 4.0 66 5.8
Gangliogliomas (M9505) 3 1.1 28 2.3 41 3.2 64 5.6
Meningiomas (M9530-9539) 1 0.4 9 0.8 16 1.3 34 3.0
Others tumors 32 11.2 35 2.9 55 4.4 70 6.1
Total 284 100.0 1197 100.0 1263 100.0 1142 100.0

ICDO-3: third edition of International Classification of Disease – Oncology.

The mean age at diagnosis was 7.0 ± 4.4 years for the whole patient group. There were differences in the distribution by histological type according to the age group (Table 1): atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, choroid plexus tumors, and other neuronal-glial tumors were more common before 1 year of age (10.2% vs 1.9%, 12.3% vs 2.0%, and 4.6% vs 0.5%, respectively); germ cell tumors, oligodendrogliomas, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors, gangliogliomas, and meningiomas were more common after 10 years of age (9.7% vs 4.0%, 5.5% vs 3.6%, 5.8% vs 3.6%, and 3.0% vs 0.9%, respectively); ependymomas and central primitive neuroectodermal tumors (c-PNETs) were more frequent in the 1-4-year age group (9.2% and 4.0%), and medulloblastomas, unspecified gliomas, and craniopharyngiomas were more frequent in the 5-9-year age group (17.0%, 8.5%, and 6.9%, respectively).

Sex Ratio

More boys were affected with CNS tumors than girls (Table 2). The M:F ratio was 1.2 for the whole material, close to 1.0 for astrocytomas, other gliomas, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, and unspecified tumors, but the M:F ratio was between 1.3 and 1.6 for ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, embryonal tumors, pituitary adenomas, germ cell tumors, and sarcomas, and M:F ratio of 2.5 for melanomas.

Table 2.

Number of cases of childhood CNS tumors, sex ratio, annual incidence rates per million children, 1-year and 5-year overall survivals by ICCC-3 diagnostic groups and subgroups (French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, 2000–2008)

Diagnosis according to the ICCC-33 n % Sex-ratio Incidence (/106)
Overall Survival (CI 95%)
ASR Cumulative 1-year OS 5-year OS
III. CNS and miscellaneous intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms 3 649 93.8 1.2 36.7 542.1 84.3 (83.1–85.4) 71.9 (70.4–73.4)
IIIa. Ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors 358 9.1 1.4 3.8 53.2 86.6 (82.6–89.7) 68.4 (63.1–73.1)
 IIIa1. Ependymomas 251 6.5 1.3 2.6 37.3 88.4 (83.8–91.8) 67.1 (60.7–72.7)
 IIIa2. Choroid plexus tumors 107 2.8 1.4 1.2 15.9 82.1 (73.4–88.2) 71.3 (61.5–79.0)
IIIb. Astrocytomas 1355 34.9 1.0 13.7 201.3 92.5 (91.0–93.7) 87.1 (85.1–88.8)
IIIc. Intracranial and intraspinal embryonal tumors 746 19.2 1.5 7.7 111.0 75.2 (71.9–78.1) 53.6 (49.9–57.2)
 IIIc1. Medulloblastomas 534 13.7 1.8 5.4 79.4 86.5 (83.3–89.1) 64.7 (60.4–68.7)
 IIIc2. c-PNET 109 2.8 1.0 1.1 16.2 57.8 (48.0–66.4) 34.3 (25.5–43.3)
 IIIc3. Medulloepitheliomas 6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.9 50.0 (11.0–80.4) 33.3 (0.0–67.6)
 IIIc4. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors 97 2.5 1.1 1.1 14.4 34.0 (24.8–43.4) 16.4 (9.9–24.5)
IIId. Other gliomas 498 12.8 1.0 4.9 74.0 60.8 (56.3–64.9 ) 35.4 (31.1–39.6)
 IIId1. Oligodendrogliomas 162 4.2 1.3 1.6 24.0 72.1 (64.5–83.0) 51.1 (43.1–58.6)
 IIId2. Mixed and unspecified gliomas 329 8.5 0.9 3.3 48.9 55.6 (50.1–60.8) 27.8 (23.0–32.8)
 IIId3. Neuroepithelial glial tumors of uncertain origin 7 0.2 0.4 0.1 1.0 42.9 (9.8–73.4) 28.6 (4.1–61.2)
IIIe. Other specified intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms 627 16.1 1.3 6.0 93.0 97.0 (95.3–98.0) 94.2 (92.0–95.8)
 IIIe1. Pituitary adenomas and carcinomas 23 0.6 1.6 0.2 3.4 100.0 (−) 100.0 (−)
 IIIe2. Tumors of the sellar region (craniopharyngiomas) 184 4.7 1.2 1.8 27.4 97.3 (93.6–98.9) 96.2 (92.1–98.2)
 IIIe3. Pineal parenchymal tumors 28 0.7 0.6 0.3 4.2 85.7 (66.3–94.4) 67.1 (46.2–81.3)
 IIIe4. Neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors 332 8.5 1.4 3.2 49.2 97.9 (95.6–99.0) 95.1 (92.1–97.0)
 IIIe5. Meningiomas 60 1.5 1.0 0.6 8.9 95.0 (85.3–98.4) 93.1 (82.6–97.4)
IIIf. Unspecified intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms 65 1.7 1.0 0.6 9.6 64.6 (51.7–74.9) 57.7 (44.7–70.7)
Xa. Intracranial and intraspinal germ cell tumors 220 5.7 1.6 2.1 32.5 95.4 (91.7–97.5) 92.1 (87.5–95.0)
 Xa1. Intracranial and intraspinal germinomas 85 2.1 2.5 0.8 12.5 100.0 (−) 97.4 (90.0–99.3)
 Xa2. Intracranial and intraspinal teratomas 83 2.1 1.0 0.9 12.3 98.8 (91.8–99.8) 97.5 (90.5–99.4)
 Xa3. Intracranial and intraspinal embryonnal carcinoma 2 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.3 50.0 (0.0–91.0) 50.0 (0.0–91.0)
 Xa4. Intracranial and intraspinal yolk sac tumors 10 0.3 2.3 0.1 1.5 70.0 (32.9–89.2) 60.0 (25.3–82.7)
 Xa5. Intracranial and intraspinal choriocarcinomas 14 0.4 1.3 0.1 2.1 92.9 (59.1–99.0) 84.4 (50.4–95.9)
 Xa6. Intracranial and intraspinal tumors of mixed forms 26 0.7 1.6 0.2 3.8 88.5 (68.4–96.1) 80.4 (59.1–91.4)
IX. Intracranial and intraspinal sarcomas 10 0.3 1.5 0.1 1.5 70.0 (32.9–89.2) 50.0 (18.4–75.3)
XId. Intracranial and intraspinal Malignant melanomas 7 0.1 2.5 0.1 1.0 28.6 (0.1–61.2) 0.0 (−)
Total 3886 100.0 1.2 39.0 577.2 84.8 (83.6–85.9) 72.9 (71.5–74.3)

Abbreviations: ARS, age-standardized rates; c-PNET, central primitive neuroectodermal tumors; ICCC-3, third version of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer; OS, overall survival.

Annual Incidence

There were ∼11.2 million children aged <15 years in France. The overall annual age-standardized incidence of brain tumors in this age group was 39.0 per 1 000 000 children (Table 2), 41.5 for boys and 35.9 for girls. The ASR was a little higher for children aged 1 to 5 years (44.6 per million) and declined slightly in older age groups (37.9 and 33.4 per million in the 5–9-year and 10–14-year age groups, respectively).

Temporal Trends in the Incidence

The incidence was stable during the 2000–2008 period with a nonsignificant conventional annual percent change of −0.2% (95% CI, −2.9%– 2.6%), P = .90.

Survival by ICCC-3 Diagnosis Groups

At the end time, 1 098 children had died with a median time after diagnosis of 12 months (min-max: 0–131 months). With 7.5% lost to follow-up, the length of follow-up ranged from 0 to 11 years, with a median follow-up of 6 years and 10 months. Table 2 describes the OSs at 1 and 5 years by ICCC-3 diagnostic groups and subgroups. For all tumors combined, OS was 84.8% (95% CI, 83.6–85.9) at 1 year and 72.9% (95% CI, 1.5–74.3) at 5 years. The best survivals were observed for pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngiomas, neuronal-glial tumors, meningiomas, and germ cell tumors, for which the 5-year OSs were higher than 90%. Conversely, the lowest survivals were observed for c-PNETs, medulloepitheliomas, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, mixed and unspecified gliomas, gliomatosis cerebri, and melanomas, for which the 5-year OSs were lower than 35%. The 5-year OSs were close to 50% for oligodendroglioma, unspecified tumors, and sarcomas, and close to 65%–70% for ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, medulloblastomas, and pineal parenchymal tumors.

Univariate Survival Analysis

During the 2000–2008 period studied, there was no variation of survival by sex. During the same period, a more favorable prognosis was significantly suggested for older children, aged 10–14 years, especially for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors, astrocytomas (IIIa diagnostic subgroup), c-PNET (IIIc diagnostic subgroup), and other specified tumors (IIIe diagnostic subgroup including 23 pituitary adenomas, 184 craniopharyngiomas, 28 pineal parenchymal tumors, 332 mixed neuronal-glial tumors, and 60 meningiomas). Conversely, for other gliomas (IIId diagnostic subgroup especially including 162 oligodendrogliomas and 329 mixed gliomas), the highest survival was observed in the 0-1-year age group (P < .001). For all tumor types, high-grade (WHO III and IV) and metastatic tumors were associated with worse survival. Compared with the supratentorial tumor site, the infratentorial tumor sites were associated with worse survival for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors, other gliomas, and other specified tumors (IIIe diagnostic group including especially mixed neuronal-glial tumors, craniopharyngiomas, and meningiomas) and with better survival for astrocytomas and c-PNETs.

Temporal Trends in the Survival

A comparison of OSs in the 2000–2002 period with those from earlier time periods (2003–2005 and 2006-2008) indicated that substantial survival gains were achieved for all tumors pooled (Table 3), with 68.4% (95% CI, 65.6–70.9), 73.2% (95% CI, 70.6–75.5), and 74.5% (95% CI,71.8–77.0), respectively, at 5 years (P < .001). The same time trends were observed for ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors in the subgroup analysis.

Table 3.

Five-year overall survival among children with CNS tumors by ICCC-3 diagnostic groups (French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, 2000–2008)

Diagnostic Groups According to the ICCC-33
III- CNS IIIa- Ependymomas and Choroid Plexus Tumors IIIb- Astrocytomas IIIc- Embryonal Tumors IIId-Other Gliomas IIIe-Other Specified Tumors Xa-Germ Cell Tumors
5-y OS (95% CI) 5-y OS (95% CI) 5-y OS (95% CI) 5-y OS (95% CI) 5-y OS (95% CI) 5-y OS (95% CI) 5-y OS (95% CI)
Sex
 Boys 72.2 (70.1–74.1) 70.1 (63.1–76.0) 86.2 (83.3–88.6) 54.4 (49.6–59.0) 35.9 (29.9–42.0) 95.9 (93.2–97.6) 90.9 (84.5–94.7)
 Girls 71.7 (69.4–73.8) 66.0 (57.7–73.1) 88.0 (85.2–90.3) 52.6 (46.7–58.1) 34.9 (29.1–40.8) 91.9 (88.0–94.6) 93.9 (85.8–97.4)
Age
 <1 year 59.6 (53.2–65.3) 63.5 (48.3–75.4) 76.7 (65.5–84.7) 32.2 (21.3–43.6) 75.0 (50.0–88.7) 76.5 (57.0–88.1) 85.0 (60.4–94.9)
 1–4 years 68.6 (65.8–71.2) 60.2 (52.0–67.4) 93.3 (90.5–95.3) 35.1 (29.4–40.9) 41.1 (32.5–49.5) 93.0 (86.5–96.4) 90.9 (77.6–96.5)
 5–9 years 71.6 (68.9–74.1) 78.1 (67.1–85.8) 85.0 (81.3–88.1) 65.2 (58.9–70.8) 22.3 (16.6–28.5) 94.2 (90.1–96.6) 92.9 (79.6–97.7)
 10–14 years 79.3 (76.6–81.7)** 80.7 (68.5–88.6)** 83.9 (79.7–87.3)** 76.7 (68.9–82.8)** 41.7 (33.9–49.3)** 96.8 (93.7–98.4)** 93.5 (86.8–96.8)
Grade
 Low grade 91.4 (90.1–92.6) 79.3 (72.9–84.3) 93.9 (92.2–95.2) 70.2 (61.5–77.3) 96.7 (94.8–97.9)
 High grade 45.7 (42.8–48.5) 50.8 (42.0–59.0) 21.6 (15.0–28.9) 23.1 (16.8–30.0) 53.0 (36.2–67.3)
 Unknown 61.2 (56.8–65.3)** 88.9 (43.3–98.4)** 97.3 (93.7–98.9)** 22.5 (17.1–28.5)** 100.0 (−) **
Site
 Supratentorial 72.7 (69.7–75.4) 71.3 (63.6–77.7) 77.4 (72.8–82.1) 28.1 (19.5–37.3) 56.7 (48.8–63.9) 97.6 (94.7–98.9) 95.2 (82.3–98.8)
 Infratentorial 63.5 (61.1–65.9) 60.1 (49.9–68.9) 87.2 (84.1–89.7) 60.4 (56.2–64.2) 19.4 (14.8–24.5) 88.3 (71.8–95.4) 83.9 (57.9–94.5)
 Unspecified 83.7 (81.3–85.8)** 73.7 (62.5–82.0)* 91.8 (89.1–93.9)** 27.1 (16.1–39.2)** 43.4 (31.4–54.9)** 92.3 (88.8–94.7)* 92.2 (86.7–95.5)
Stage
 Not metastatic 74.0 (72.5–75.5) 70.5 (65.2–75.1) 87.8 (85.9–89.5) 56.8 (52.5–60.9) 35.4 (31.2–39.7) 94.7 (92.6–96.2) 91.8 (82.2–94.8)
 Metastatic 43.3 (36.8–49.5)** 10.3 (0.0–35.5)** 45.8 (25.6–64.0)** 44.2 (36.9–51.3)** 33.3 (0.1–67.6) 63.6 (29.7–84.5)** 75.0 (12.8–96.1)
Period
 2000–2002 68.4 (65.6–70.9) 58.3 (48.8–66.7) 84.2 (80.4–87.3) 51.1 (44.8–57.0) 30.8 (23.8–38.1) 93.1 (88.4–95.9) 89.4 (80.0–94.6)
 2003–2005 73.2 (70.6–75.5) 66.0 (56.9–73.6) 90.3 (87.2–92.7) 52.6 (46.2–58.4) 38.0 (30.8–45.2) 94.9 (91.1–97.2) 90.8 (81.6–95.5)
 2006–2008 74.5 (71.8–77.0)## 82.3 (73.4–88.5)## 86.8 (83.2–89.7) 57.6 (50.6–64.0) 37.7 (30.2–45.1) 94.3 (90.1–96.7) 97.0 (88.5–99.2)

Abbreviations: 5-y OS, 5-year overall survival; c-PNET, central primitive neuroectodermal tumors; NOS, not otherwise specified; ICCC-3, third version of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer.

test Logrank: *P value <.05, **P value <.01; test Log-rank trend: #P value <.05, ##P value <.01.

Low grade: Astrocytic tumors: M94003, M94203, M94113, M94503, M94211, M94103, M93841; Choroid plexus tumors: M93900; Ependymal tumors: M93913, M93941, M93933, M93831; Glial tumors of uncertain origin: M94441; Meningiomas: M95340, M95391, M95381, M95320, M95300, M95310, M95330, M95370; Mixed tumors: M93823; Neuronal and neuronal-glial tumors: M95061, M95061, M94121, M94130, M94930, M94920, M95051, M86801; Pineal parenchymal tumors: M93611; Tumors of the sellar region: M93501, M93511, M93521, M95820.

High grade: Astrocytic tumors: M94013, M94413, M94403, M94423, M94513; Choroid plexus tumors: M93903; Embryonal tumors: M95083, M94713, M94743, M94703, M94703, M95013, M94723, M94733, M94733; Ependymal tumors: M93923; Glial tumors of uncertain origin: M93813; Meningiomas: M95303, M95383; Mixed tumors: M93823; Neuronal and neuronal-glial tumors: M95053; Pineal parenchymal tumors: M93623, M93623.

Multivariate Survival Analysis

Table 4 presents results of the multivariate analyses of age, sex, tumor location, grade, stage, and period of diagnosis. We observed a statistically significant reduction of the HR for all tumors pooled in more recent periods compared with 2000–2002. Analysis by diagnostic subgroup confirmed the results only for ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, and c-PNETs. Analysis by age, sex, tumor location, grade, and stage confirmed the results of univariate analyses.

Table 4.

Results of multivariate analysis of survival of children with CNS tumors by ICCC-3 diagnostic groups (French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, 2000–2008)

Diagnostic Groups According to the ICCC-33
III- CNS IIIa-Ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors IIIb-Astrocytomas IIIc-Embryonal tumors IIId-Other gliomas IIIe- Other specified tumors Xa-Germ cell tumors
HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Sex
 Boys Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Girls 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.3) 0.9 (0.8–1.2) 1.7 (0.9–3.3) 0.8 (0.3–2.0)
Age
 <1 year 1.3 (1.1–1.7) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 2.3 (1.3–4.0) 1.4 (0.9–1.9) 0.4 (0.2–0.9) 3.6 (1.3–10.3) 1.5 (0.3–6.9)
 1–4 years Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 5–9 years 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 1.2 (0.8–1.8) 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 1.6 (1.2–2.1) 0.9 (0.4–2.0) 1.0 (0.2–4.3)
 10–14 years 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 1.2 (0.8–1.8) 0.3 (0.2–0.4) 1.3 (0.9–1.7) 0.6 (0.2–1.5) 0.9 (0.3–3.3)
Grade
 Low grade Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 High grade 7.0 (5.9–8.3) 2.5 (1.7–3.8) 23.2 (16.7–32.3) 4.2 (3.0–6.1) 16.5 (8.0–33.9)
 Unknown 5.9 (4.8–7.3) 0.6 (0.1–4.2) 0.7 (0.3–1.5) 2.9 (2.0–4.1) 1.1 (0.1–8.6)
Site
 Supratentorial Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Infratentorial 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.6 (1.0–2.4) 1.3 (0.9–1.8) 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 2.3 (1.7–3.0) 5.5 (1.8–16.7) 1.9 (0.3–10.4)
 Unspecified 0.5 (0.4–0.6) 0.9 (0.6–1.6) 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 1.6 (1.1–2.3) 1.2 (0.6–2.7) 1.1 (0.3–4.1)
Stage
 Not metastatic Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Metastatic 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 2.2 (1.1–4.2) 5.9 (3.2–10.7) 1.5 (1.2–1.9) 0.7 (0.3–2.0) 1.2 (0.4–4.0) 1.8 (0.2–14.5)
Period
 2000–2002 Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 2003–2005 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.7 (0.4–1.0) 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 1.2 (0.5–2.5) 0.8 (0.3–2.3)
 2006–2008 0.7 (0.6–0.9) 0.3 (0.2–0.6) 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.7 (0.6–0.9) 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 1.0 (0.5–2.4) 0.3 (0.1–1.3)

Abbreviations: c-PNET: central primitive neuroectodermal tumors; NOS: not otherwise specified; ICCC-3: third version of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer.

Cox proportional hazards regression.

Low grade: Astrocytic tumors: M94003, M94203, M94113, M94503, M94211, M94103, M93841; Choroid plexus tumors: M93900; Ependymal tumors: M93913, M93941, M93933, M93831; Glial tumors of uncertain origin: M94441; Meningiomas: M95340, M95391, M95381, M95320, M95300, M95310, M95330, M95370; Mixed tumors: M93823; Neuronal and neuronal-glial tumors: M95061, M95061, M94121, M94130, M94930, M94920, M95051, M86801; Pineal parenchymal tumors: M93611; Tumors of the sellar region: M93501, M93511, M93521, M95820.

High grade: Astrocytic tumors: M94013, M94413, M94403, M94423, M94513;Choroid plexus tumors: M93903;Embryonal tumors: M95083, M94713, M94743, M94703, M94703, M95013, M94723, M94733, M94733; Ependymal tumors: M93923; Glial tumors of uncertain origin: M93813; Meningiomas: M95303, M95383; Mixed tumors: M93823; Neuronal and neuronal-glial tumors: M95053; Pineal parenchymal tumors: M93623, M93623.

Discussion

This study describes the incidence and the survival of childhood CNS tumors in France during the period 2000–2008, based on national population-based cancer registry data. We showed that the incidence was stable during this period, with average annual age-standardized rates of 39.0 per million. We demonstrated that the high proportion of deaths had occurred within 1 year from diagnosis and that the 5-year survival improved over time to reach 74.5% (95% CI, 71.8–77.0) at the end of the period. We also noted an age-specific incidence of CNS tumors by subtype and variations in survival between age at diagnosis, histological type, location, stage, and grade of tumor.

CNS tumors in children are a heterogeneous group, with more than 100 histological rare and distinct entities. Variations in classification and registration practices complicate the characterization of incidence, survival, and temporal trends data.1315 Recent publications in the Nordic European countries, in Canada, and in the United States covering the same period have reported comparable incidence rates from 40 to 42 per million.1520 The completeness of the French National Registry of Childhood Solid Tumors, due to national coverage and compulsory registration of both benign and malignant tumors based to various sources of notification, provides a nonbiased and valid view of the situation in France during the period studied.1 In our study, no variation in incidence has been shown during the last 10 years in France. Conversely, several studies analyzing incidence during the last 30–40 years have observed a significant increase from +0.7% to +5.7%, particularly during the 1975–1990 period and especially for astrocytomas, due to differences in registration and diagnostic technologies implemented in the mid 1980s and not representing real differences in incidence.15,18,21 Rates for CNS tumors have been stable since 1990 in the United States and the Nordic European countries.15,19,22

Our 5-year overall survival rates for French children with CNS tumors were comparable to those reported in other European countries, Australia, and the United States during the same period18,19,2325 (Table 5), except for intracranial and intraspinal germ-cell tumors with a lower survival probability in the United States and in Australia (84.7%, 84.5% vs 92.1%, respectively) and for other gliomas with a higher survival probability (greater than 50% in the United States and Australia and between 42% and 44% in Germany, Sweden, and Great Britain vs 35.4% in our study). It is difficult to compare our results with other studies because selection criteria are not the same; some suggest different analyses to describe the epidemiology of CNS germ cell tumors (pineal vs nonpineal analysis), including only a behavior code of 3 (ie, malignant).5,26,27 In our series of CNS germ cell tumors, 36% of tumors were mature teratomas (n = 79), and 64% were malignant (85 germinomas, 4 immature teratomas, 2 embryonal carcinomas, 10 yolk sac tumors, 14 choricarcinomas, and 26 mixed germ cell tumors). Survival rates did differ by biological behavior and histology, with mature teratomas having the highest 5-year overall survival (100%), and immature teratomas having the lowest 5-year overall survival (50%), 97.4% for germinomas, 84.4% for choriocarcinomas, and 80.4% for mixed germ cell tumors. Gliomas comprise a broad, heterogeneous spectrum of CNS tumors, depending on the registry and the histological criteria used.28 According to the third version of the ICCC,3 astrocytomas are grouped with glioblastomas and optic nerve gliomas (IIIb diagnostic group). Differences in the 5-year overall survival have been observed between low-grade astrocytomas (93% ± 1%), high-grade astrocytomas (28% ± 5%) and optic nerve/chiasma gliomas (91% ± 3%).19 Discordance between institutional diagnosis of high-grade glioma and a central review, which favored the diagnosis of low-grade glioma, was observed in 15%–30% of reviewed cases, and this proportion could be different between countries.29,30

Table 5.

Five-year survival rates by types of CNS tumors among children in Europe, in Australia, and the United States

Diagnostic Groups According to the ICCC-33 Europe
United Statesd Australiae
France (2000–2008) % (95% CI) Germanya (2001–2010) % Swedenb (1984–2005) % (95% CI) Great Britainc (2001–2005)% (2002–2008)% (1995–2004)% (95% CI)
III-CNS tumors 71.9 (70.4–73.4) 76 76 (75–77) 71 71.1 70.8 (68.3–73.2)
 IIIa-Ependymoma and choroid plexus tumor 68.4 (63.1–73.1) 80 72 (68–76) 67 69.6 68.6 (59.6–76.0)
 IIIb-Astrocytoma 87.1 (85.1–88.8) 80 84 (83–85) 81 84.3 77.9 (74.5–80.9)
 IIIc-Embryonal tumors 53.6 (49.9–57.2) 66 61 (58–64) 56 59.8 50.5 (44.2–56.5)
  Medulloblastoma 65.7 (60.4–68.7) 63 (59–67
  Supratentorial cPNET 34.3 (25.5–43.3) 47 (40–54)
 IIId-Other gliomas 35.4 (31.1–39.6) 42 44 (40–48) 44 52.1 53.8 (45.8–61.02)
  Oligodendroglioma 51.1 (43.1–58.6) 78 (71–85)
  Mixed and unspecified gliomas 27.8 (23.0–32.8) 42 (36–48)
  Neuroepithelial glial tumors 28.6 (4.1–61.2) 12 (6–18)
Xa-CNS Germ-cell tumors 92.1 (87.5–95.0) 90 84.7 84.5 (72.8–91.5)

aData from Ref. [24].

bData from Ref. [19].

cData from Ref. [25].

dData from Ref. [18].

eData from Ref. [23].

From 68.4% (95% CI, 65.6–70.9) in 2000–2002, ICCC-3: third version of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer.

Moreover, recent microarray analyses used an unsupervised approach to identifying different molecular subtypes of CNS tumors after grouping for metastatic status, histology, and/or survival, especially for medulloblastomas.31 Our diagnostic subgroup analysis cannot study outcome for new CNS classifications including distinct genetic profiles. In conclusion, differences in survival could be explained by differences in distribution of anatomical site, histological type, tumor grade, biological behavior, and/or molecular classification.

Our 5-year overall survival rate improved significantly during the 2000s, from 68.4% (95% CI, 65.6–70.9) in 2000–2002, 73.2% (95% CI, 70.6–75.5) in 2003–2005, to 74.5% (95% CI, 71.8–77.0) in 2006–2008. During the 1990s, Desandes et al.32 reported a 5-year overall survival rate of French children with CNS tumor of 64.8% (95% CI, 61.4–68.1). Our survival time trends showed a reduction in the risk of death during the 2000s : HR of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.7–0.9) for the 2003–2005 period and HR of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.6–0.9) for the 2006–2008 period compared to the 2000–2002 period. These results should be interpreted with caution because biases may have been introduced to the difficulty of identifying an event, as the death, in patients with shorter follow-up (patients included in more recent time periods), and the increasing probability of observing an event with longer follow-up (patients diagnosed in the earlier time periods).

Our analysis by histological groups showed improvement in the 5-year overall survival, especially for ependymomas from 58.3% in 2000–2002 to 82.3% in 2006–2008. As shown by Koshy et al.,33 postoperative radiation (PORT) improves survival in children with intracranial ependymomas. The 3-year overall survival was significantly improved for patients younger than aged 3 years who received PORT compared with those who did not (81% vs 56%, respectively; P = .005). In our study, the proportion of children with ependymomas treated by PORT has significantly improved from 7.8% in 2000–2002 to 29.7% in 2006–2008. As all studies are based on a cancer registry database, our study is also limited by the lack of complete data about treatment. No information was available on chemotherapy (type of drugs, number of cycles, … ), surgery (complete or incomplete resection, … ), and radiotherapy technique (total dose, fraction size, radiation volume, … ). Indeed, it is difficult to establish a causal relationship between radiation therapy and good prognosis.

The basic prognostic factors revealed by this study were similar to those reported by other studies.19,34 c-PNET showed the poorest prognosis. The patient's sex is not a prognostic factor whereas age is, with the worst prognosis being among infants compared with older children. Young children have a higher proportion of malignancies in the cerebellum and brain stem, and their prognosis remains poor despite advances in treatment. However, caution should be taken with clinical series that report better survival than population-based studies.35 It is important to review the outcome data and study of basic prognostic factors at the populational level, but our study has limitations including the lack of detailed clinical and treatment data that may impact survival. The ongoing collection of precise treatments for all cases included in the national registry will allow us to better describe outcome according to the treatment and to know their long-term effects.

In conclusion, this study confirms results from recent publications in which the incidence of CNS tumors is stable and close to 40 per million. The overall survival still improves over time and is approximately 73% at 5 years. The ongoing need for population-based surveillance remains relevant to analyzing major changes in environmental risk factors. Insights from population-based incidence and survival analyses provide an opportunity to better understand the impact of site and histological patterns on outcomes associated with CNS tumors and inform future research.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the “Institut National du Cancer (INCa)”, the “Institut de Veille Sanitaire (InVS)” and the “Ligue contre le Cancer”.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Karine Feuerstose and Francoise Piron for their technical assistance and to the numerous investigators who have meticulously contributed to the active search for information in clinical departments. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to the heads of the Medical Information Departments of all the University Hospitals and Comprehensive Cancer Centers who provided Information System Medicalization Program files. With regard to access to medical records, the medical teams' generous assistance is gratefully acknowledged. Finally, the authors would like to thank all the members of the French Society against Childhood Cancer.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

References

  • 1.Lacour B, Guyot-Goubin A, Guissou S, et al. Incidence of childhood cancer in France: National Children Cancer Registries, 2000–2004. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010;19:173–181. doi: 10.1097/cej.0b013e32833876c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:97–109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition. Cancer. 2005;103:1457–1467. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tycsynski J, Demaret E, Parkin D. Standards and Guidelines for Cancer Registration Network in Europe. The ENCR recommendations. Lyon: IARC Technical Publication n°40; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Frizt A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Third edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parkin D, Kramarova E, Draper GJ, et al. International Incidence of Childhood Cancer. Vol.II. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1998. IARC Scientific Publications no. 144. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ries LAG, Smith MA, Gurney JG, et al. Cancer Incidence and Survival among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975-1995, National Cancer Institute, SEER Program. NIH Pub. No. 99-4649. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shuster JJ. Median follow-up in clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:191–192. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaplan E, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mantel N. Evaluation of survival date and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. Br J Cancer. 1977;35:1–39. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1977.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. New-York: Chapman and Hall; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bauchet L, Rigau V, Mathieu-Daude H, et al. Clinical epidemiology for childhood primary central nervous system tumors. J Neurooncol. 2009;92:87–98. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9740-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McKinney PA. Central nervous system tumours in children: epidemiology and risk factors. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S60–S68. doi: 10.1002/bem.20149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schmidt LS, Schmiegelow K, Lahteenmaki P, et al. Incidence of childhood central nervous system tumors in the Nordic countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:65–69. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States - CBTRUS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2004–2008. 2012. Available at http://www.cbtrus.org/reports/reports.html . Accessed August 6, 2012.
  • 17.Brown M, Schrot R, Bauer K, Dodge J. Incidence of first primary central nervous system tumors in California, 2001–2005: children, adolescents and teens. J Neurooncol. 2009;94:263–273. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9860-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Cancer Institute - The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2009. 2012. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/index.html. Accessed August 6, 2012.
  • 19.Lannering B, Sandstrom PE, Holm S, et al. Classification, incidence and survival analyses of children with CNS tumours diagnosed in Sweden 1984–2005. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:1620–1627. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rosychuk RJ, Witol A, Wilson B, Stobart K. Central nervous system (CNS) tumor trends in children in a western Canadian province: a population-based 22-year retrospective study. J Neurol. 2012;259:1131–1136. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6314-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spix C, Eletr D, Blettner M, Kaatsch P. Temporal trends in the incidence rate of childhood cancer in Germany 1987–2004. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1859–1867. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Linabery AM, Ross JA. Trends in childhood cancer incidence in the U.S. (1992–2004) Cancer. 2008;112:416–432. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Australian Paediatric Cancer Registry. Childhood cancer survival in Australia, 1995–2004. 2010. Available at http://www.cancerqld.org.au/icms_docs/60676_Childhood_cancer_survival_in_Australia_1995-2004.pdf . Accessed September 3, 2013.
  • 24.German Childhood Cancer Registry. Annual Report 2011. 2012. Available at http://www.kinderkrebsregister.de/dkkr-gb/veroeffentlichungen/annual-reports.html?L=1 . Accessed September 3, 2013.
  • 25.Childhood Cancer Research Group. Survival from childhood cancer, Great Britain, 1971–2005. 2010. Available at http://www.ccrg.ox.ac.uk/datasets/availabledata.shtml . Accessed September 3, 2013.
  • 26.Villano JL, Propp JM, Porter KR, et al. Malignant pineal germ-cell tumors: an analysis of cases from three tumor registries. Neuro Oncol. 2008;10:121–130. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Villano JL, Virk IY, Ramirez V, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of central nervous system germ cell tumors: nonpineal analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:257–264. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nop029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qaddoumi I, Sultan I, Gajjar A. Outcome and prognostic features in pediatric gliomas: a review of 6212 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer. 2009;115:5761–5770. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fouladi M, Hunt DL, Pollack IF, et al. Outcome of children with centrally reviewed low-grade gliomas treated with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy on Children's Cancer Group high-grade glioma study CCG-945. Cancer. 2003;98:1243–1252. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chastagner P, Kalifa C, Doz F, et al. Outcome of children treated with preradiation chemotherapy for a high-grade glioma: results of a French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP) Pilot Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49:803–807. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kool M, Koster J, Bunt J, et al. Integrated genomics identifies five medulloblastoma subtypes with distinct genetic profiles, pathway signatures and clinicopathological features. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Desandes E, Berger C, Tron I, et al. Childhood cancer survival in France, 1990–1999. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Koshy M, Rich S, Merchant TE, et al. Post-operative radiation improves survival in children younger than 3 years with intracranial ependymoma. J Neurooncol. 2011;105:583–590. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0624-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Magnani C, Aareleid T, Viscomi S, Pastore G, Berrino F. Variation in survival of children with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies diagnosed in Europe between 1978 and 1992: the EUROCARE study. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:711–721. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.von Bueren AO, von Hoff K, Pietsch T, et al. Treatment of young children with localized medulloblastoma by chemotherapy alone: results of the prospective, multicenter trial HIT 2000 confirming the prognostic impact of histology. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13:669–679. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nor025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES