Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cryobiology. 2014 Mar 22;68(3):419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.03.005

Table 3.

Functional survival of fresh and vitrified mouse oocytes and 2-cell embryos

Vitrification sol’n # eggs/2-cell embryos (# runs) N (%) Morpholog. Normal N (%) 2-cell N (%) Expanded Blastocyst
A. Oocytesa
None (Control) 40 (8) 40 (100) 38 (95 ± 3.3) 32 (80 ± 3.8)
0.33–4b 40 (8) 36 (90 ± 4.0) 30 (83 ± 6.1) 20 (56 ± 4.9)
0.33–5b 25 (5) 22 (88 ± 4.9) 19 (86 ± 8.0) 11 (50 ± 6.4)
B, 2-cell embryosc
None (Control) 20 (4) 20 (100) 16 (80 ± 11.5)
Solution control 20 (4) 20 (100) 17 (85 ± 9.6)
0.33–4b 25 (5) 23 (92 ± 4.9) 20 (88 ± 8.0)

The number and percentage that are morphologically normal is Columns 3/2. The numbers and percentages that are functionally viable are Columns 4/3 and 5/3

a

After vitrification, the oocytes were exposed to freshly collected sperm diluted to a concentration of 3 × 106/ml with Cook Fertilization medium. The sperm concentration is critical (see text)

b

These two solutions yielded about the highest morphological survivals after vitrification of those tried. They are both modified 3-fold dilutions of standard full strength EAFS-10–10 vitrification solution with the compositions given in Table 1. The oocytes in those solutions were cooled to −196°C at ~69,000°C/min and warmed by laser at an estimated 1.0 × 107°C/min. Samples of 2-cell embryos were also warmed 100-times more slowly at 105 °C/min. Only 5% were morphologically normal and 0/20 developed to expanded blastocysts.

c

Fresh 2-cell embryos collected from the oviducts of mated females.