Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Oct 31;40(3):596–602. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24412

In vivo CEST Imaging of Creatine (CrCEST) in Skeletal Muscle at 3T

Feliks Kogan 1, Mohammad Haris 1, Catherine Debrosse 1, Anup Singh 1, Ravi P Nanga 1, Kejia Cai 1, Hari Hariharan 1, Ravinder Reddy 1
PMCID: PMC4059780  NIHMSID: NIHMS521966  PMID: 24925857

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) based technique to measure free creatine (Cr), a key component of muscle energy metabolism, distribution in skeletal muscle with high spatial resolution before and after exercise at 3T.

Methods

CrCEST saturation parameters were empirically optimized for 3T. CEST, T2, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) acquisitions of the lower leg were performed before and after mild plantar flexion exercise on a 3T whole-body MR scanner on 6 healthy volunteers.

Results

The feasibility of imaging Cr changes in skeletal muscle following plantar flexion exercise using CrCEST was demonstrated at 3T. This technique exhibited good spatial resolution and was able to differentiate differences in muscle utilization among subjects. CrCEST results were compared with 31P MRS results showing good agreement in the Cr and PCr recovery kinetics. A relationship of 0.45 % CrCESTasym/mM Cr was observed across all subjects.

Conclusion

Demonstrated the CrCEST technique could be applied at 3T to measure dynamic changes in creatine in in vivo muscle. The widespread availability and clinical applicability of 3T scanners has the potential to clinically advance this method.

Keywords: CrCEST, Muscle, Creatine, Chemical Exchange, Endogenous Contrast

Introduction

Creatine (Cr) plays an essential role in the storage and transmission of phosphate-bound energy (1). During exercise, Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is broken down into Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and phosphate group for energy. To maintain the ATP supply, phosphocreatine (PCr) is broken down by the creatine kinase (CK) reaction leading to an increase in Cr (2).

ADP+PCr+H+CKCr+ATP [1]

Thus exercise leads to a decrease in PCr and an increase in Cr

Aliphatic protons of free creatine and PCr have the same chemical shifts making it rather difficult to measure their individual contributions to the observed proton magnetic resonance spectrum (1H MRS) at clinical field strengths (3). On the other hand, 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is able to relay information about the concentrations of PCr, Pi, as well as muscle pH and has been used extensively to study oxidative metabolism of skeletal muscle (4). 31P MRS been applied to studies of bioenergetic impairment in various muscle impairments as well as in cardiac energetics (5-7). However, 31P MRS, like all spectroscopy techniques, suffers from poor spatial resolution as well as low sensitivity due the low gyromagnetic ratio of 31P. Additionally, neither 1H MRS nor 31P MRS can measure free Cr.

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) is a new contrast enhancement technique that enables the indirect detection of molecules with exchangeable protons and exchange-related properties (8,9). CEST makes MRI sensitive to the concentrations of endogenous metabolites and their environments (10-12). Cr exhibits a concentration dependent CEST effect between its amine (−NH2) and bulk water protons (13,14). This technique allows for the monitoring of Cr concentration changes with high spatial resolution (15).

More recently, the potential of measuring the CEST effect from Cr (CrCEST) in spatial and temporal mapping of muscle Cr following exercise was demonstrated at ultra-high field (7T)(15). Furthermore, it was shown that due to differences in amine proton exchange rates, the CEST effect from Cr can be isolated from the other metabolites of the creatine kinase reaction (PCr, ATP, ADP). CrCEST also showed complementary recovery kinetics to the 31P MRS PCr signal under the same exercise conditions (15). Nonetheless, ultra-high field scanners are still not widely available and they are currently limited for clinical research only. In order for rapid clinical translation, it is important to characterize the CrCEST effect at lower fields.

In this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of imaging Cr at 3T in skeletal muscle using CrCEST. Changes in CrCEST in the calf muscles of healthy human volunteers were mapped following plantar flexion exercises. Additionally, changes in PCr levels under the same exercise conditions were assessed using 31P MRS. Furthermore, we also measured changes in magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and T2 following exercise. Finally, we showed complementary recovery kinetics of CrCEST and under the same exercise conditions. Finally, the potential advantages and disadvantages of CrCEST at 3T compared to 7T are discussed.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

All Studies were conducted under an approved Institutional Review Board protocol. Written informed consent from each volunteer was obtained after explaining the study protocol. CEST, T2, MTR and 31P MRS acquisitions of the lower leg were performed in separate exercise bouts at 3T on healthy volunteers (n=6, 3 male, 3 female, ages 19-30) with various activity levels (sedentary to active).

MRI Scans

Imaging experiments were performed using an 8-channel 1H knee coil (In vivo, Gainesville, FL, USA) on a 3T whole body scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). 31P MRS was performed with a rigid 1H/31P dual-tuned transmit/receive surface coil (RAPID Biomedical GmbH, Rimpar, Germany) with a 7 cm diameter. Plantar flexion exercise was performed inside the scanner using an MR compatible pneumatically controlled foot pedal as described previously (15). The pressure applied to the pedal was held constant at 7.5 psi across all subjects to ensure the exercise was not strenuous but still resulted in PCr changes. CEST imaging experiments utilized a 500 ms long saturation pulse train consisting of a series of 96 ms Hanning windowed saturation pulses with a 4 ms inter-pulse delay (96% duty cycle, 100 ms pulse train), followed by a single shot RF spoiled gradient echo (GRE) readout with centric phase encoding order. The excitation bandwidth of this saturation pulse train was 10 Hz for a 500 ms saturation duration with a 1% bandwidth of 40 Hz. A chemical shift selective quad phasic fat saturation pulse with a bandwidth of 2 kHz centered at 5 ppm from water was applied prior to magnetization preparation to reduce the signal from fat in the muscle. In order to empirically optimize imaging parameters and observe the effect of varying saturation parameters, CrCEST maps were acquired at varying saturation amplitude and pulse durations. Z-spectra at varying saturation amplitudes and durations were also acquired of the lower leg muscles from −4 to 4 ppm. Water saturation shift reference (WASSR) images and B1 maps were collected, as described previously (16,17), for all CEST studies before and after exercise to correct for B0 and B1 inhomogeneities. WASSR images were collected with a saturation pulse train amplitude, B1rms of 12.4 Hz (0.3 μT) and 200 ms duration from −0.5 ppm to 0.5 ppm with a step size of 0.05 ppm. Cr amine protons have a chemical shift of 1.8 ppm downfield from water under physiological conditions (pH 7.0 & 37°C) and thus CEST images were collected in a frequency shift range with respect to the water resonance of +1.5 ppm to +2.1 ppm and −1.5ppm to −2.1 ppm with a 0.3 ppm step size to calculate CrCESTasym and allow for adequate B0 inhomogeneity correction (14).

In vivo Image Acquisition Parameters

For each imaging methodology (CEST, T2/MTR, 31P MRS), baseline imaging was performed for 2 minutes, followed by 2 minutes of mild plantar flexion exercise and then 8 minutes of post exercise imaging. Lower leg CrCEST imaging was performed with imaging parameters: slice thickness = 8 mm, flip angle = 10°, TR = 5.6 ms, TE = 2.7 ms, field of view = 140 × 140 mm2, matrix size = 128 × 128, saturation pulse amplitude, B1rms = 93 Hz (2.25μT), saturation duration tsat=500 ms, with one saturation pulse every 8 seconds. To compute MTR maps, the same sequence with a saturation duration of 1 second was performed at 20 ppm along with a sequence without selective saturation. For T2 maps, a T2 spin-echo prepared FLASH sequence was used with the parameters mentioned above at echo times of 2.4, 10, 20, 30, and 40 ms (18). Finally, non-localized 31P MRS was performed with the surface coil positioned on the calf using a free induction decay (fid) sequence with parameters: spectral width = 2 kHz, number of points = 512, averages = 5, and TR = 2.4 s. In order to determine the depth of penetration of the 31P surface coil, a 31P fid based chemical shift imaging (CSI) sequence was used with the following parameters: FOV =200 × 200 mm2, Slice Thickness = 25 mm, TR = 1500 ms, matrix size = 32 × 32, flip angle = 20°, averages = 4.

Data Processing

All image processing and data analysis was performed using in-house written MATLAB (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, version 7.5, R 2009b) scripts. B0 maps were used to generate corrected CEST images (± 1.8 p.p.m.) using the WASSR method (16). Similarly, B1 maps were created from two images obtained using preparation square pulses with flip angles of 30° and 60° and the FLASH readout parameters described above for CrCEST imaging. A B1 calibration curve for muscle was developed from calf CEST data at varying saturation amplitudes and used in conjunction with B1 maps to correct for B1 inhomogeneities (17) CEST contrast was computed by subtracting the normalized magnetization signal at the Cr proton frequency (Δω = +1.8 ppm), from the magnetization at the corresponding reference frequency symmetrically at the opposite side of the water resonance (−Δω) (19)

CESTasym=Msat(Δω)Msat(+Δω)Msat(Δω) [2]

Z-spectra were computed by fitting a 3rd degree polynomial to B0 corrected water magnetization data as a function of saturation frequency offset (16,20). Similarly, asymmetry curves were calculated by applying equation [2] to each frequency acquired in the z-spectra. The entire soleus, medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles were manually segmented from anatomical images and applied to CrCESTasym, T2, and MTR maps in order to determine the changes in each individual muscle group before and after exercise.

Similarly, MTR maps were computed by

MTR=M0MsatM0×100% [3]

Where M0 is the magnetization without saturation and MSat is the magnetization with a saturation pulse applied at Δω = 20 ppm. T2 maps were created by fitting images acquired with various echo times to S = S0eTE/T2 and solving for T2 on a pixel-wise basis. 31P MRS Spectra were phased and baseline corrected and then fitted using nonlinear squares methods with Lorentzian functions.

Results

In vivo Z-spectra and Parameter Optimization

Figure 1 shows the z-spectra and corresponding asymmetry curves for varying saturation amplitudes and constant 500 ms duration (Fig 1a,b) as well as varying saturation durations at a constant saturation amplitude of B1rms = 2.25 μT (Fig. 1c,d). The z-spectra and CEST asymmetry plot from the soleus muscle at baseline was broad and showed maximum CEST assymetry at ∼ 1.8 ppm, the chemical shift of Cr amine protons. Increasing B1rms or the saturation duration results in a broadening of the z-spectra and asymmetry curves. At lower saturation power, increases in the saturation amplitude result mainly in increases in CESTasym due to a higher labile proton saturation efficiency. However, when the saturation efficiency is already high, increases in B1rms result in increased direct water saturation, which decrease the CESTasym as well as the SNR of base CEST images. Thus in order to maximize CESTasym and SNR, a B1rms of 93 Hz (2.16 μT) and saturation duration of 500 ms were used for the 3T CEST experiments in this study. We define the CEST effect at Δω = 1.8 ppm using those saturation parameters as CrCEST.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The data (crosses) fitted z-spectra (solid lines) and corresponding asymmetry plots for the soleus muscle at baseline for (a,b) varying saturation amplitudes [B1rms = 0.72 μT, 1.44 μT, 2.16 μT, 2.87 μT, and 3.59 μT] and constant 500 ms duration as well as (c,d) varying saturation durations [tsat = 250ms, 500ms, 1000 ms and 1500 ms] at a saturation amplitude of B1rms = 2.15 μT. CrCESTasym at Δω=1.8 ppm is indicated with a dotted line.

In vivo human studies

Figure 2 shows CrCESTasym maps with a temporal resolution of 24 seconds generated before and after mild plantar flexion exercise at 3T for a single subject. Following plantar flexion exercise, an increase CrCESTasym is observed in the posterior compartment of the leg, which then recovers to basal values. The average CESTasym in each segmented muscle of posterior compartment of the lower leg, the soleus as well as the medial (MG) and lateral (LG) heads of the gastrocnemius muscles, is plotted as a function of time at baseline and following exercise in figure 3. Following exercise, an increase in CESTasym of 2.0 %, 2.7 % and 4.2 % was observed in the soleus, medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles, respectively. The CrCESTasym in all the muscles was seen to recover back to baseline after roughly about 2 minutes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CrCESTasym maps of a human calf muscle before and every 24 seconds after (in order by number) 2 minutes of mild plantar flexion exercise. Color bar represents CrCESTasym in percent. The segmented anatomical image is displayed in the bottom left.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Plot of the average CrCESTasym as function of time in 3 different muscles of the calf [Soleus, Medial Gastrocnemius (MG) and Lateral Gastrocnemius (LG)] segmented from anatomical images (Top Right). Error bars represent the standard deviation in the CrCESTasym in each region.

The exercise protocol was repeated to measure any T2 and MT changes that could potentially confound the CEST effect. Figure 4 shows MTR (Fig 4a) and T2 (Fig 4b) maps at baseline and following plantar flexion exercise with a temporal resolution of 28 seconds. As shown in the figure, changes in T2 or MTR (ΔT2< 1.0 ms, ΔMTR < 1.0%) observed following exercise were not appreciable (ΔT2< 1.0 ms, ΔMTR < 1.0%).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) MTR and (b) T2 maps before and every 28 seconds after (in order by number) the 2 minutes of mild plantar flexion exercise.

In order to validate the observed increase in creatine, 31P MRS was performed to observe changes in PCr. The concentrations of PCr and Cr are tightly coupled in the creatine kinase reaction. Figure 5a shows every alternate 31P MRS spectra acquired 2 minutes before and 8 minutes after exercise with a temporal resolution was 12 seconds. Following exercise, there is a decrease in the PCr peak area, which recovers back to the pre-exercise levels in about 2 minutes. The size and area of the three ATP peaks remained constant (± 3% variation) before and after this exercise. The Pi peak is seen to increase after exercise and then quickly decay back to baseline levels. No shift or splitting of the Pi peak was observed indicating that there were negligible intracellular pH changes (pH = 7.02±0.04). Since a free induction decay (fid) was used to acquire 31P MR spectra, the signal was unlocalized. A separate chemical shift imaging (CSI) sequence was used to determine the depth of penetration of the surface coil and showed that the majority of the fid signal (∼85%) from the surface coil is obtained from a depth less than 1.8 cm from the coil and thus the majority of the 31P MRS signal comes from the gastrocnemius muscle. Finally, when comparing the CrCESTasym from the area of the gastrocnemius muscles equal to that of the 31P surface coil excitation to the relative PCr peak area integrated to a 24 second temporal resolution, a very good agreement was observed in the rate and shape of recovery (fig 5b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Stacked plot of every alternate 31P MRS spectra acquired 2 minutes before and 8 minutes after exercise with a 12 second temporal resolution. (b) Comparison between the CrCESTasym from the area of the gastrocnemius muscles equal to that of the 31P surface coil excitation and 31P MRS PCr signal as a function of time at an equal temporal resolution of 24 seconds.

Exercise data from all 6 volunteers is shown in figure 6. Figure 6a shows the 31P MRS PCr peak integral as a function of time. The mean CrCESTasym corresponding to the 31P MR Signal is plotted as a function of time for each subject in figure 6b. Some subject variability was observed in regards to the level and involvement of each muscle group. However, good agreement is seen between the two figures in the rate and shape at which they recover back to baseline following exercise for each subject. To determine the dependence of the change in CESTasym on the change in creatine concentration, the % decrease in the PCr signal following exercise was used to determine the decrease in PCr based on a 33 mM PCr baseline concentration (21). Due to the coupling of PCr and Cr in the CK reaction, the decrease in PCr concentration should equate to an equivalent increase in Cr concentration. Thus comparing the average change in the CESTasym corresponding to the 31P MR signal to the calculated change in Cr concentration across all subjects produces a slope of 0.45 % CrCESTasym/mM Cr with an R2 value 0.65 (Fig. 7).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

CrCESTasym and 31P MRS data across subjects. (a) 31P MRS PCr peak integral as a function of time. (b) Mean CrCESTasym corresponding to the 31P MR Signal is plotted as a function of time for each subject. For each subject, good agreement is seen between the two figures in the rate and shape at which they recover back to baseline following exercise

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Plot of the average change in the CESTasym corresponding to the 31P MR Signal as a function of the calculated change in Cr concentration across all subjects. The % decrease in the PCr signal following exercise was used to determine the decrease in PCr based on a 33 mM PCr baseline concentration (19). As the total Cr remains constant, the decrease in PCr concentration was equated to an equivalent increase in Cr concentration. This produces a slope of 0.45 % CrCESTasym/mM Cr with an R2 value 0.65 with the y-intercept set to zero.

Discussion

The results of this work demonstrate the feasibility of using the CrCEST technique at 3T to measure creatine with high spatial resolution in muscle following exercise.

There are several challenges to translating the CrCEST technique from 7T to 3T. The chemical shift (Δω) between Cr amine protons and free water protons is directly proportional to the static magnetic field (B0) and thus is decreased at 3T (∼540 Hz at 7T vs. ∼225 Hz at 3T). The decrease in chemical shift at 3T results in the frequency selective saturation pulse being applied closer to the water resonance, leading to an increase in direct water saturation. This greatly decreases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of base CEST images. To address the decrease in SNR to some extent, a larger slice thickness was used in this study. Another consequence of increased direct water saturation is that the B1 that gives the optimal CrCESTasym is lower at 3T than at 7T. This decreases the labile proton saturation efficiency, which similarly decreases CrCESTasym. However, the optimal exchange rate of Cr amine protons lends itself to CEST imaging at lower fields. With empirically optimized parameters, the dependence of the change in CESTasym on the change in creatine concentration following exercise at 3T (0.45 % CrCESTasym/mM Cr) is approximately half of that observed at 7T (0.84 % CrCESTasym/mM Cr)(15).

There are also advantages to CrCEST imaging at 3T. At 3T, muscle T2 relaxation times are longer (T2(3T) = 29.3ms, T2 (7T) = 23.0 ms (22)) which allows us to regain some of the SNR lost due to higher direct water saturation due to irradiation closer to water. Similarly, T1 relaxation times are shorter at lower fields. As the repetition time between saturation pulses (Shot TR) is directly correlated to the T1, this allows for increased temporal resolution. This is significant for translation of this method to studies of muscle energetics, which have a time course on the order of 30 seconds to a few minutes. In this study, the TR was minimized to optimize the temporal resolution while maintaining adequate SNR. There is potential for further improving the temporal resolution by decreasing the resolution. Additionally, methods to reduce CEST scan times while maintaining adequate B0 correction will also increase the temporal resolution and further advance the clinical applicability of this technique. Finally, the widespread availability and clinical applicability of 3T scanners will allow this method to be advanced and translated into clinical applications more rapidly.

The potential confounders to the CrCEST effect in this model of mild plantar flexion exercise are thoroughly discussed in muscle CrCEST experiments done at 7T (15). Mild plantar flexion exercise is not expected to result in a decrease in muscle pH. This is supported by 31P MRS data in this study, which showed no shift or splitting of the Pi peak. Similarly, as no pH changes were observed, we assume that there is no glycogen contribution to the observed CrCEST changes in the mild exercise employed in this study (23). Additionally, MTR maps showed negligible changes before and after exercise, and thus we do not expect any MT contamination to the measured increase in CrCESTasym following exercise. Finally, it was shown that the other CK metabolites (ATP, ADP, and PCr) are not expected to contribute to the CrCEST effect (14). This is mainly due to the exchange rate of their amine group protons which are about an order of magnitude lower than that of Cr and thus do not show CEST enhancement with parameters that optimize CrCESTasym. Since there were negligible changes in the pH, T2, or MTR of exercised muscle as well as negligible CEST effects from other creatine kinase reaction metabolites, it can be concluded that the observed changes in CrCESTasym in this model of plantar flexion exercise are predominantly due to changes in muscle Cr concentration.

It is also necessary to point out several potential limitations of the study. In this study, the 31P signal was unlocalized and as a result was not obtained from same slice as CEST data but rather from part of the gastrocnemius muscles from a large area of the calf. Thus, as the spectral data is obtained from a larger volume of the leg, comparisons made between CrCESTasym and 31P MRS are estimates. It should also be noted that multiple exercise bouts were used to acquire CEST, T2, MTR, and 31P MRS data. This could result in differences in muscle changes between exercise bouts. Nevertheless, the variances are expected to be small, as exercise was mild and subjects were healthy volunteers.

In summary, this work has demonstrated the feasibility of in vivo CrCEST imaging on routine clinical scanners (3T) to measure changes in Cr concentration in muscle following plantar flexion exercise. Similar to ultra-high fields, at 3T there was good agreement between the recovery kinetics of 31P MRS and CrCESTasym following exercise. The widespread availability and clinical applicability of 3T scanners will allow for more rapid translation to clinical applications for the diagnosis and treatment of muscle disorders as well as to enhance research into conditions such as heart and renal failure, and other secondary complications of metabolic disorders.

Acknowledgments

Grant Support: P41EB015893; P41EB015893S1; T32EB009384.

References

  • 1.Chance B, Williams GR. Respiratory enzymes in oxidative phosphorylation .3. The steady state. J Biol Chem. 1955;217(1):409–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davies RE. A molecular theory of muscle contraction - calcium-dependent contractions with hydrogen bond formation plus atp-dependent extensions of part of myosin-actin cross-bridges. Nature. 1963;199(489):1068–1074. doi: 10.1038/1991068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bottomley PA, Lee YH, Weiss RG. Total creatine in muscle: Imaging and quantification with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1997;204(2):403–410. doi: 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoult DI, Busby SJW, Gadian DG, Radda GK, Richards RE, Seeley PJ. Observation of tissue metabolites using P-31 nuclear magnetic-resonance. Nature. 1974;252(5481):285–287. doi: 10.1038/252285a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Argov Z, Lofberg M, Arnold DL. Insights into muscle diseases gained by phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23(9):1316–1334. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200009)23:9<1316::aid-mus2>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tarnopolsky MA, Parise G. Direct measurement of high-energy phosphate compounds in patients with neuromuscular disease. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22(9):1228–1233. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199909)22:9<1228::aid-mus9>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yabe T, Mitsunami K, Inubushi T, Kinoshita M. Quantitative measurements of cardiac phosphorus metabolites in coronary-artery disease by P-31 magnetic-resonance spectroscopy. Circulation. 1995;92(1):15–23. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guivel-Scharen V, Sinnwell T, Wolff S, Balaban R. Detection of proton chemical exchange between metabolites and water in biological tissues. J Magn Reson. 1998;133:36–45. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1998.1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dagher A, Aletras A, Choyke P, Balaban R. Imaging of urea using chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Img. 2000;12:745–748. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200011)12:5<745::aid-jmri12>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ward K, Aletras A, Balaban R. A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST) J Magn Reson. 2000;143:79–87. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou J, Wilson D, Sun P, Klaus J, van Zijl P. Quantitative description of proton exchange processes between water and endogenous and exogenous agents for WEX, CEST, and APT experiments. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:945–952. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kogan F, Hariharan H, Reddy R. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Imaging: Description of Technique and Potential Clinical Applications. Current Radiology Reports. 2013:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s40134-013-0010-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sun P, Benner T, Kumar A, Sorensen A. Investigation of optimizing and translating pH-sensitive pulsed-chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging to a 3T clinical scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(4):834–841. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haris M, Nanga RPR, Singh A, Cai K, Kogan F, Hariharan H, Reddy R. Exchange rates of creatine kinase metabolites: feasibility of imaging creatine by chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. NMR Biomed. 2012;25:1305–1309. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kogan F, Haris M, Singh A, Cai K, Debrosse C, Nanga RPR, Hariharan H, Reddy R. Method for high-resolution imaging of creatine in vivo using chemical exchange saturation transfer. Magn Reson Med. 2013 doi: 10.1002/mrm.24641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim M, Gillen J, Landman B, Zhou J, van Zijl P. Water Saturation Shift Referencing (WASSR) for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Experiments. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:1441–1450. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh A, Cai K, Haris M, Hariharan H, Reddy R. On B1 inhomogeneity correction of in vivo human brain glutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2012:n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parrish T, Hu X. A new T2 preparation technique for ultrafast gradient-echo sequence. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:652–657. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu G, Gilad AA, Bulte JWM, van Zijl PCM, McMahon MT. High-throughput screening of chemical exchange saturation transfer MR contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2010;5(3):162–170. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou J, Lal B, Wilson DA, Laterra J, van Zijl PC. Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:1120–1126. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kemp GJ, Meyerspeer M, Moser E. Absolute quantification of phosphorus metabolite concentrations in human muscle in vivo by P-31 MRS: a quantitative review. NMR Biomed. 2007;20(6):555–565. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jordan CD, Saranathan M, Bangerter NK, Hargreaves BA, Gold GE. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T and 7.0T: A comparison of relazation times and image contrast. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:734–739. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rossiter HB, Ward SA, Howe FA, Kowalchuk JM, Griffiths JR, Whipp BJ. Dynamics of intramuscular P-31-MRS P-i peak splitting and the slow components of PCr and O-2 uptake during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93(6):2059–2069. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00446.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES