Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jun 17;9(6):e100064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100064

Nocardia brasiliensis Induces Formation of Foamy Macrophages and Dendritic Cells In Vitro and In Vivo

Irene Meester 1,¤, Adrian Geovanni Rosas-Taraco 1, Mario Cesar Salinas-Carmona 1,*
Editor: Jörn Coers2
PMCID: PMC4061056  PMID: 24936860

Abstract

Foamy cells have been described in various infectious diseases, for example in actinomycetoma induced by Nocardia brasiliensis. These cells are generally considered to be macrophages, although they present dendritic cell (DC)-specific surface markers. In this study, we determined and confirmed the lineage of possible precursors of foamy cells in vitro and in vivo using an experimental actinomycetoma model in BALB/c mice. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) or DC (BMDC) were infected in vitro with N. brasiliensis or labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE). Both, macrophages and DC, differentiated into foamy cells after in vitro infection. CFSE-labeled BMDM or BMDC were tested for phagocytosis and CD11c/CD11b receptors markers expression before being transferred into the actinomycetoma lesion site of infected mice. In vivo studies showed that BMDM and BMDC were traced at the site where foamy cells are present in the experimental actinomycetoma. Interestingly, many of the transferred BMDM and BMDC were stained with the lipid-droplet fluorophore Nile Red. In conclusion, macrophages and DC cells can be differentiated into foamy cells in vitro and in vivo during N. brasiliensis infection.

Introduction

Lipid-laden foamy cells may appear in bacterial infections some of them; produce world health problems, such as malaria and tuberculosis. In fact, members the four main groups of pathogens, virus [1], [2], bacteria [3], [4], fungi [5] and parasites [6] have been related with the presence of lipid-laden cells in infected tissues. Prostaglandins production and foamy cells may appear as part of the host response [7], [8], reports suggest that foamy cells may favor pathogen persistence in the host [9]. For example, foamy cells in leprosy are related with the aggressive lepromatous form of the disease [10], [11]. Foamy cells in tuberculosis play a role as a refuge for dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis [4], which has switched to a lipid-based metabolism [12]. Biochemical analysis of the caseous material showed that its main components were triglycerides and cholesterol, suggesting that the accumulated lipids are not indigestible remnants of the micobacterial cell wall but rather host-derived lipids [13].

Foamy cells have also been observed in the actinomycetoma that may develop after accidental inoculation with the saprophyte Nocardia brasiliensis [14]. N. brasiliensis belongs to the Actinomycetes, as do Mycobacteria spp., and they share a similar architecture of the cell wall with abundant mycolic acids, which are important virulence factors [15], [16]. However, N. brasiliensis has a larger genome, which encodes more proteins that enable the bacteria to deal with the harsh, ever-changing environments of the soil or to develop resistance to antibiotics [17]. Actinomycetoma by N. brasiliensis is endemic in México, and failure of antibiotic treatment due to resistance development often leads to amputation as a final option of treatment [18].

In order to study the host-pathogen interaction in actinomycetoma by N. brasiliensis, we have developed a murine experimental model [14]. Innate, Th1 and Th2 type immunity are involved in the host response against N. brasiliensis [19], but N. brasiliensis is able to escape from microbicidal mechanisms and multiply both extracellularly and within macrophages [20]. We focused our attention to define the lineage of foamy cells in actinomycetoma.

It is generally accepted that macrophages are the precursors of foamy cells [4], [10], but there are indications that they might arise from dendritic cells (DC) [21], [22]. Lineage studies of foamy cells are mainly based on surface markers, which are difficult to interpret as the surface markers are not exclusive to either cell type and/or markers may be acquired or lost depending on life cycle or activation status. In order to be conclusive about whether macrophages, DC or both are the precursors of foamy cells, we carried out in vitro and in vivo studies. We present strong evidence that not only macrophages but also dendritic cells become foamy cells in either in vitro infection or an in vivo experimental actinomycetoma model by Nocardia brasiliensis.

Materials and Methods

Mice

BALB/c mice were cared for and handled according to the International Review Board regulations and the Mexican Animal Protection Law (NOM-062-ZOO-1999), and were given Purina rodent food and distilled water ad libitum. The Bioethics Committee of the Facultad de Medicina at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León approved this study under registration IN 10-003.

Generation of Bone Marrow-derived Macrophages (BMDM) and Dendritic Cells (BMDC)

Mice were anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Bone marrow cells of femurs and tibiae of donor BALB/c mice were collected, treated with ammonium chloride [23] and washed in complete RPMI (RPMI-1640/25 mM HEPES/24 mM bicarbonate supplemented with 50–100 U penicillin/mL, 50–100 µg streptomycin/mL, (all Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO, USA; RPMI) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Mediatech, Manassas, VA, USA) or complete advanced DMEM (advanced DMEM medium supplemented with 25 mM HEPES, 50–100 U penicillin/mL, 50–100 µg streptomycin/mL, (all Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO, USA) and 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Mediatech, Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were plated at 1×105 cells/cm2 in complete RPMI or complete advanced DMEM with their respective differentiation factors: 1) 30% L929-conditioned medium for BMDM [24], and 2) 20 ng/mL recombinant murine granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and 20 ng/mL interleukin 4 (IL-4) (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for BMDC. Media were refreshed every 2–3 days and cells were allowed to differentiate during 6 days. As negative control, we used non adherent cells from mouse spleen. In order to obtain these cells, spleen was removed under sterile conditions to prepare a cell suspension. Mononuclear cells were isolated using a ficoll diatrizoate density gradient and plated at 1×105 cells/cm2, incubated in complete advanced DMEM overnight. Non-adherent cells were obtained and used in adoptive transference assays.

Labeling of Cells

Cells were labeled with 2 µM carboxy-fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl-ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Viable cells that had been harvested with the use of scrapers one day after CFSE-labeling were counted by trypan blue exclusion using a hemocytometer. In the case of BMDC, ‘contaminating’ neutrophils were eliminated by washing the adherent cell layer 2–3 times with 10 mM phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.3 (PBS), whereas macrophages were depleted with the aid of streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cell suspension was concentrated in 100 µL and incubated with biotin-conjugated anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, e-Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) diluted 1∶100 in complete RPMI for 15 min at room temperature plus 30 min at 4°C. After washing, the cell suspension was incubated with the magnetic beads, washed and passed through an MS-column (Miltenyi).

Immunophenotyping of Surface Markers by Flow Cytometry

To block Fc-receptors, cells, 5×105/50 µL complete RPMI, were incubated with murine hyperimmune serum (generated against N. brasiliensis) diluted 1∶50 for 15 min. at room temperature. Then, 1 volume of 2x solutions of specific conjugated antibody mixtures in complete RPMI were added: 1) anti-CD11b-allophycocyanin (1∶150, M1/70)+anti-CD11c-phycoerythrin (1∶40, N418), 2) anti-F4/80-phycoerythrin (1∶80, BM8)+anti-CD205-allophycocyanin (1∶625, 205 yekta), all e-Biosciences, and 3) the various phycoerythrin-conjugated isotype controls were anti-rat IgG2a, anti-rat IgG2b, and anti-hamster IgG (1∶50, all Caltag/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After incubation in the dark for 15 min. at room temperature plus 30 min. at 4°C, the cells were washed 3 times with 2 mL PBS (400×g, 8 min.) and suspended in 550 µL 1% formalin/PBS or fixed in 10% formalin/PBS (30 min 4°C) and washed again 3 times in PBS to be suspended in 500 µL PBS. At least 1×104 cells were analyzed using a FACSCalibur or FACS Canto II cytometer (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) and Pro Quest or FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Phagocytosis Assay

1×106 BMDM or BMDC cells suspended in complete RPMI were seeded and allowed to adhere for 2 h in normal culture conditions before being incubated with a 30-fold excess of 2 µm Latex beads (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) for 3 h at 37°C. After extensive washing with PBS, cells were fixed in 10% formalin and 100 cells were counted (in duplicate) and the percentage of phagocytosis was determined.

In vitro Infection of BMDM and BMDC

BMDM and BMDC were seeded in 8-well Permanox slide chambers (Lab-Tex Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rochester, NY) at 5×104 cells per well in 700 µL of advanced DMEM medium/5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Mediatech, Manassas, VA, USA) without antibiotics, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 h. BMDM and BMDC were infected for 2 h with log-fase N. brasiliensis strain (ATCC no. 700358), cultured and recovered as described in [16], at a multiplicity of infection of 5∶1, After the removal of extracellular bacteria, cells were incubated for an additional 48 h in advanced DMEM/5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum without antibiotics before lipid body staining.

Lipid Body Staining

Monolayers were washed 3 times with a sterile 0.85% saline solution and fixed in 10% formalin for 10 min. After the addition of 60% isopropanol, the chamber was removed and BMDM and BMDC were stained with Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min. Slides were rinsed with 60% isopropanol and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Adoptive Transfer and Cell Tracing in the Actinomycetoma

Female BALB/c mice (8–10 wk) were infected with 106 colony-forming units of N. brasiliensis into the left rear footpad as previously described [14]. At day 15 or 30 of the infection, 2×104–5×105 CFSE-labeled DC, macrophages or non-adherent control cells/100 µL PBS were injected into the lesions or the left rear footpad of control mice; 7 days later, biopsies of lesions were fixed in 10% formalin/PBS for 8–24 h, washed 3 times in PBS and saturated with 30% sucrose/PBS before being included in OCT to cut 10-µm cryostate sections. For detection of lipid droplets, slides were stained with Nile Red (Molecular Probes; 300 ng/mL in PBS from a 1 mg/mL stock in methanol). After washing the slides in PBS, they were mounted with Vectashield including 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Throughout the process, exposure to light was kept to a minimum. Slides were observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM700 or LSM710; Zeiss or TCS SPS; Leica) using a 20x/0.8 M27 Plan-Apochromat objective and a 30–39 µm pinhole with the following excitation/emission wavelength (λex/em) settings: λex/em 360/458–531 for DAPI, λex/em 488/490–569 for CFSE; and λex/em 591/594–692 nm for Nile Red. Image analysis was performed with ZEN2009 or LAS AS software.

Statistics

Student’s T test was used to detect significant differences between CFSE-labeled cells and control cells. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results and Discussion

Murine BMDM are easily generated in vitro with L929-conditioned medium as can be verified by their homogeneous morphology (fig. 1 a) and F4/80 expression in over 98% of the harvested cells (fig. 1c). On the other hand, murine bone marrow cells differentiated with GM-CSF and IL-4 generated a mixture of semi-adherent DC, adherent macrophages, and neutrophils in suspension [25]. The latter were easily removed by elimination of the medium and washing of the adherent cells. However, considering the aim of the study, it was most important to deplete all macrophages from the DC cell cultures. We did not rely on the commonly applied technique of positive selection of CD11c-labeled or CD205-labeled cells because macrophages tend to be CD11c+ [26], [27], and CD205+ macrophages have been described [21], [28]. Therefore, we chose for depletion of F4/80+ cells. F4/80 is considered a macrophage marker, although a subpopulation of DC, for example epidermal Langerhans cells and kidney DC, might also be F4/80+ [29], [30], [31]. To ensure DC (fig. 1b), we preferred losing some DC above having a macrophage contamination. Figure 1d demonstrates that less than 5% of the macrophage-depleted BMDC were F4/80+.

Figure 1. Morphology and immunophenotype of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) and dendritic cells (BMDC).

Figure 1

Five-day cultures of BMDM generated with 30% L929-conditioned medium (A) or BMDC generated with 20 ng/mL GM-CSF and IL-4 (B); images were taken at 200x+digital zoom. Over 98% of the BMDM were F4/80+ (C), but less than 4.5% of the macrophage-depleted BMDC were F4/80+ (D).

Although CFSE labeling (fig. 2a) affected BMDM and BMDC morphology at the short term with cells rounding up during the first hours after labeling, the next day, viable cells had recovered typical morphology and adherence. The immunophenotype pattern was hardly altered between control and CFSE-labeled BMDM or BMDC (fig. 2b) and considered acceptable. Similarly, functionality was unaffected as verified by phagocytosis studies of harvested and reseeded CFSE-labeled and control BMDM, which had phagocytosis indices of 96.0% (±2.96) and 97.6% (±2.14), respectively; meanwhile CFSE-labeled and control BMDC had phagocytosis indices of 78.6% (±4.1) and 77.6% (±5.8), respectively (fig. 3).

Figure 2. CFSE-labeling does not alter phenotype.

Figure 2

A) BMDM and BMDC were fluorescent-labeled with 2 µM CFSE. B) Representative dot plots (1 out of 3 independent experiments) show that control (CTR) and CFSE-labeled macrophages (CFSE) had similar CD11b and CD11c expression profiles.

Figure 3. CF.SE-labeling does not alter functionality.

Figure 3

The phagocytosis capacity of control and CFSE-labeled BMDM or CFSE-labeled BMDC were similar; 100 cells were counted; the experiment was repeated 3 times; P>0.05.

The in vitro study revealed that BMDM and BMDC became foamy cells as both accumulated lipids into their cytoplasm after infection with N. brasiliensis, whereas uninfected BMDM and BMDC did not (fig. 4). CFSE-labeled BMDM and BMDC, transferred into 30-days lesions of experimental actinomycetoma induced by N. brasiliensis, could be traced 7 days later interspersed into the fibrotic ring of multilocular microabscesses, the typical site of foamy cells. The lipid droplet fluorophore Nile Red co-localized within the transferred cells, either BMDM or BMDC, as well as in recipient’s own cells that had accumulated lipid droplets (fig. 5). On the other hand, non-adherent control cells were localized out of fibrotic area and did not accumulate lipid droplets. Thus, we demonstrated that macrophages and DC can be differentiated into foamy cells, both in vitro and in vivo.

Figure 4. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) and dendritic cells (BMDC) become lipid-laden after in vitro infection with N. brasiliensis.

Figure 4

Non-infected BMDM and BMDC (A) and BMDM and BMDC infected with N. brasiliensis were stained with Oil Red O as described in Materials and Methods. Only infected macrophages and dendritic cells were Oil Red O positive. (Images were taken at 100×magnification).

Figure 5. Transferred CFSE-labeled macrophages (Mφ) and dendritic cells (DC) become lipid-laden.

Figure 5

Macrophages (Mφ; in A) and dendritic cells (DC; in B) transferred at day 30 of a N. brasiliensis infection are 7 days later localized in the fibrotic ring (FR) of a microabscess (MA). Non-adherent spleen control cells (NACC; in C) transferred at day 30 of a N. brasiliensis infection are 7 days later localized outside of the FR and MA. Nile Red staining of lipid droplets is observed in transferred Mφ (D) and DC (E). Transferred cells are stained green by CFSE, lipid droplets are stained red by Nile Red, and nuclei are stained blue with DAPI.

The ability of both cell types to become lipid-laden further diminishes the supposed difference between them. Although separate lineages for either cell type have been reported [32], both 1) can differentiate from monocytes [26], 2) share many cell surface markers in fact, it is hard to find an exclusive surface marker, 3) can present antigens, and 4) can be classically activated, known as M1 macrophages or TipDC, respectively [33], [34]. Moreover, recently our group reported that N. brasiliensis modulates the local immune system to favor chronic disease and bacterial. The local microenvironment is a characterized by the expression of inflammatory (interferon-gamma) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10 and IL-13) cytokines [35][36]. This immunological environment may play an important role in foamy cell formation and bacterial survival. The mechanism for lipid droplet accumulation in N. brasiliensis infected macrophages and DC remains to be elucidated, however the findings from infections with some mycobacterial species may apply because they share a similar cell wall composition and genetic background. The accumulation of cholesterol and cholesterol esters in macrophages infected with Mycobacterium leprae [37] may favor intracellular survival in at least two ways as it facilitates mycobacterial entry and is involved in the inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion [38]. The involvement of Toll-like receptors, especially TLR-2 and TLR-6 has been studied in Mycobacterium leprae pathogenesis [10] [39]. As a consequence of the activation of the innate immune response, membrane lipids are liberated to generate eicosanoid immunomodulators, such as prostaglandin E (PGE), which accumulate inside the cell [7], [10]. Oxygenated mycolic acids, or the oxygenated lipids generated because of reactive oxygen species, induce the expression of lipid scavenger receptors and thus facilitate lipid uptake and the formation of lipid-laden cells [4] [40]. Key regulators of lipid metabolism are a family of lipid sensor nuclear receptors, which include three types of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ [41]. A variety of endogenous lipids and synthetic ligands stimulate PPAR to induce gene expression that finally results in lowering circulating lipid levels, In addition, PPAR agonists have significant anti-inflammatory activities [41], [42], which may be independent of PPAR [43], These PPAR, especially PPARγ, have received most attention in studying molecular mechanisms of lipid accumulation in mycobacterial infected cells [44], [45]. Virulent, but not avirulent, mycobacterial infection induced a TLR-2 dependent PPARγ expression that correlated with lipid droplet accumulation [44], which in turn correlated with intracellular pathogen survival [45]. Furthermore, PPARγ modulated the cytokine profile of macrophages infected with the attenuated M. tuberculosis strain H37Ra by diminishing pro-inflammatory signaling and favoring the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [45]. The anti-inflammatory cytokine profile favors alternative activation of macrophages and pathogen survival. We previously reported the local induction of an anti-inflammatory environment with increased expression of IL-13 and IL-10 in our actinomycetoma model [35], [36], Any of these mechanisms may be involved in accumulation of lipids in either macrophages or DC in the N. brasiliensis infection, that may be studied in the future.

In conclusion, we present strong experimental evidence, that macrophages and DC differentiate to foamy cells in vitro and in vivo infections.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by a grant to AGRT from CONACYT México (99149). IM is grateful for the CONACYT study grant 229067. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. McLauchlan J (2009) Lipid droplets and hepatitis C virus infection. Biochim Biophys Acta 1791: 552–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Samsa MM, Mondotte JA, Iglesias NG, Assuncao-Miranda I, Barbosa-Lima G, et al. (2009) Dengue virus capsid protein usurps lipid droplets for viral particle formation. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mei CL, He P, Cheng B, Liu W, Wang YF, et al. (2009) Chlamydia pneumoniae induces macrophage-derived foam cell formation via PPAR alpha and PPAR gamma-dependent pathways. Cell Biol Int 33: 301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Peyron P, Vaubourgeix J, Poquet Y, Levillain F, Botanch C, et al. (2008) Foamy macrophages from tuberculous patients’ granulomas constitute a nutrient-rich reservoir for M. tuberculosis persistence. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Noverr MC, Phare SM, Toews GB, Coffey MJ, Huffnagle GB (2001) Pathogenic yeasts Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans produce immunomodulatory prostaglandins. Infect Immun 69: 2957–2963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sonda S, Ting LM, Novak S, Kim K, Maher JJ, et al. (2001) Cholesterol esterification by host and parasite is essential for optimal proliferation of Toxoplasma gondii. J Biol Chem 276: 34434–34440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rangel Moreno J, Estrada Garcia I, De La Luz Garcia Hernandez M, Aguilar Leon D, Marquez R, et al. (2002) The role of prostaglandin E2 in the immunopathogenesis of experimental pulmonary tuberculosis. Immunology 106: 257–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen M, Divangahi M, Gan H, Shin DS, Hong S, et al. (2008) Lipid mediators in innate immunity against tuberculosis: opposing roles of PGE2 and LXA4 in the induction of macrophage death. J Exp Med 205: 2791–2801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saka HA, Valdivia RH (2012) Emerging Roles for Lipid Droplets in Immunity and Host-Pathogen Interactions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10. Mattos KA, D’Avila H, Rodrigues LS, Oliveira VG, Sarno EN, et al. (2010) Lipid droplet formation in leprosy: Toll-like receptor-regulated organelles involved in eicosanoid formation and Mycobacterium leprae pathogenesis. J Leukoc Biol 87: 371–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tanigawa K, Suzuki K, Kimura H, Takeshita F, Wu H, et al. (2009) Tryptophan aspartate-containing coat protein (CORO1A) suppresses Toll-like receptor signalling in Mycobacterium leprae infection. Clin Exp Immunol 156: 495–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Daniel J, Maamar H, Deb C, Sirakova TD, Kolattukudy PE (2011) Mycobacterium tuberculosis uses host triacylglycerol to accumulate lipid droplets and acquires a dormancy-like phenotype in lipid-loaded macrophages. PLoS Pathog 7: S1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kim MJ, Wainwright HC, Locketz M, Bekker LG, Walther GB, et al. (2010) Caseation of human tuberculosis granulomas correlates with elevated host lipid metabolism. EMBO Mol Med 2: 258–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Salinas-Carmona MC, Torres-Lopez E, Ramos AI, Licon-Trillo A, Gonzalez-Spencer D (1999) Immune response to Nocardia brasiliensis antigens in an experimental model of actinomycetoma in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun 67: 2428–2432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hunter RL, Olsen MR, Jagannath C, Actor JK (2006) Multiple roles of cord factor in the pathogenesis of primary, secondary, and cavitary tuberculosis, including a revised description of the pathology of secondary disease. Ann Clin Lab Sci 36: 371–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Trevino-Villarreal JH, Vera-Cabrera L, Valero-Guillen PL, Salinas-Carmona MC (2012) Nocardia brasiliensis Cell Wall Lipids Modulate Macrophage and Dendritic Responses favoring Development of Experimental Actinomycetoma in BALB/c Mice. Infect Immun. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17. Vera-Cabrera L, Ortiz-Lopez R, Elizondo-Gonzalez R, Perez-Maya AA, Ocampo-Candiani J (2012) Complete genome sequence of Nocardia brasiliensis HUJEG-1. J Bacteriol 194: 2761–2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Welsh O V-CL, Mejía MA (2007) Aspectos clínicos, radiológicos y terapúeticos del actinomicetoma. In: Serrano JA SAH, Beaman BL, editor. Actinomicetoma. 1 ed. México D.F.: Plaza y Valdés, S.A. de C. V: 159–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Salinas-Carmona MC, Rosas-Taraco AG, Welsh O (2012) Systemic increased immune response to Nocardia brasiliensis co-exists with local immunosuppressive microenvironment. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20. Salinas-Carmona MC (2000) Nocardia brasiliensis: from microbe to human and experimental infections. Microbes Infect 2: 1373–1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ordway D, Henao-Tamayo M, Orme IM, Gonzalez-Juarrero M (2005) Foamy macrophages within lung granulomas of mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis express molecules characteristic of dendritic cells and antiapoptotic markers of the TNF receptor-associated factor family. J Immunol 175: 3873–3881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Paulson KE, Zhu SN, Chen M, Nurmohamed S, Jongstra-Bilen J, et al. (2010) Resident intimal dendritic cells accumulate lipid and contribute to the initiation of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 106: 383–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kouoh F, Levert H, Gressier B, Luyckx M, Brunet C, et al. (2000) Reduced ammonium chloride haemolysis time enhances the number of isolated functional rabbit polymorphonuclear neutrophils. APMIS 108: 417–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tomida M, Yamamoto-Yamaguchi Y, Hozumi M (1984) Purification of a factor inducing differentiation of mouse myeloid leukemic M1 cells from conditioned medium of mouse fibroblast L929 cells. J Biol Chem 259: 10978–10982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. O’Neill HC, Wilson HL (2004) Limitations with in vitro production of dendritic cells using cytokines. J Leukoc Biol 75: 600–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ammon C, Meyer SP, Schwarzfischer L, Krause SW, Andreesen R, et al. (2000) Comparative analysis of integrin expression on monocyte-derived macrophages and monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Immunology 100: 364–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Guth AM, Janssen WJ, Bosio CM, Crouch EC, Henson PM, et al. (2009) Lung environment determines unique phenotype of alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 296: L936–946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Inaba K, Swiggard WJ, Inaba M, Meltzer J, Mirza A, et al. (1995) Tissue distribution of the DEC-205 protein that is detected by the monoclonal antibody NLDC-145. I. Expression on dendritic cells and other subsets of mouse leukocytes. Cell Immunol 163: 148–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Austyn JM, Gordon S (1981) F4/80, a monoclonal antibody directed specifically against the mouse macrophage. Eur J Immunol 11: 805–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Martin P, del Hoyo GM, Anjuere F, Ruiz SR, Arias CF, et al. (2000) Concept of lymphoid versus myeloid dendritic cell lineages revisited: both CD8alpha(−) and CD8alpha(+) dendritic cells are generated from CD4(low) lymphoid-committed precursors. Blood 96: 2511–2519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kruger T, Benke D, Eitner F, Lang A, Wirtz M, et al. (2004) Identification and functional characterization of dendritic cells in the healthy murine kidney and in experimental glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 613–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Liu K, Victora GD, Schwickert TA, Guermonprez P, Meredith MM, et al. (2009) In vivo analysis of dendritic cell development and homeostasis. Science 324: 392–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gordon S (2003) Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 23–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Serbina NV, Salazar-Mather TP, Biron CA, Kuziel WA, Pamer EG (2003) TNF/iNOS-producing dendritic cells mediate innate immune defense against bacterial infection. Immunity 19: 59–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Meester I, Rosas-Taraco AG, Salinas-Carmona MC (2013) Retnla down-regulation and IL-13-rich environment correlate with inflammation severity in experimental actinomycetoma by Nocardia brasiliensis. Pathog Dis 67: 214–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rosas-Taraco AG, Perez-Linan AR, Bocanegra-Ibarias P, Perez-Rivera LI, Salinas-Carmona MC (2012) Nocardia brasiliensis induces an immunosuppressive microenvironment that favors chronic infection in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun 80: 2493–2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kurup IG, Mahadevan P (1982) Cholesterol metobolism of macrophages in relation to the presence of Mycobacterium leprae. J Biosci. 4: 307–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Elamin AA, Stehr M, Singh M (2012) Lipid droplets and Mycobacterium leprae infection. J Pathog 2012: 361374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mattos KA, Oliveira VGC, D’Avila H, Rodrigues LS, Pinheiro RO, et al. (2011) TLR6-driven lipid droplets in Mycobacterium leprae-infected Schwann cells: immunoinflammatory platforms associated with bacterial persistence. J Immunol 187: 2548–2558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu W, Yin Y, Zhou Z, He M, Dai Y (2014) OxLDL-induced IL-1 beta secretion promoting foam cell formation was mainly via CD36 mediated ROS production leading to NLP3 inflammasome activation. Inflamm Res 63: 33–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Michalik L, Auwerx J, Berger JP, Chatterjee VK, Glass CK, et al. (2006) International Union of Pharmacology LXI. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors. Pharmacol Rev 58: 726–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yao J, Pan D, Zhao Y, Zhao L, Sun J, et al.. (2014) Wogonin prevents LPS-induced acute lung injury and inflammation in mice via PPAR-gamma-mediated attenuation of the nuclear factor-κB pathway. Immunol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43. Chawla A, Barak Y, Nagy L, Liao D, Tontonoz P, et al. (2001) PPAR-gamma dependent and independent effects on macrophage-gene expression in lipid metabolism and inflammation. Nat Med 7: 48–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Almeida PE, Silva AR, Maya-Monteiro CM, Töröcsik D, D’Avila H, et al. (2009) Mycobacterium tuberculosis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin infection induces TLR2-dependent peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ expression and activation: functions in inflammation, lipid metabolism, and pathogenesis. J Immunol 183: 1337–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Mahajan S, Dkhar HK, Chandra V, Dave S, Nanduri R, et al. (2012) Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates macrophage lipid-sensing nuclear receptor PPARγ and TR4 for survival. J Immunol 188: 5593.5603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES