Abstract
Study of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci has gained great popularity in recent years, partly due to their function in protecting vertebrates from infections. This is of particular interest in amphibians on account of major threats many species face from emergent diseases such as chytridiomycosis. In this study we compare levels of diversity in an expressed MHC class II locus with neutral genetic diversity at microsatellite loci in natterjack toad (Bufo (Epidalea) calamita) populations across the whole of the species’ biogeographical range. Variation at both classes of loci was high in the glacial refugium areas (REF) and much lower in postglacial expansion areas (PGE), especially in range edge populations. Although there was clear evidence that the MHC locus was influenced by positive selection in the past, congruence with the neutral markers suggested that historical demographic events were the main force shaping MHC variation in the PGE area. Both neutral and adaptive genetic variation declined with distance from glacial refugia. Nevertheless, there were also some indications from differential isolation by distance and allele abundance patterns that weak effects of selection have been superimposed on the main drift effect in the PGE zone.
Introduction
The basis of adaptive rather than neutral genetic variation has become increasingly accessible in recent years as loci under selection are identified and characterised. Some of the most popular genes used in this context are those belonging to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). These genes play an important role in the adaptive immune response of vertebrates. MHC class I molecules present intracellular pathogen peptides to CD8+ T lymphocytes (T cells), primarily in response to viral infections, whereas MHC class II molecules (composed of α and β subunits) present extracellular pathogen peptides to CD4+ T cells after invasion by bacteria and fungi [1]. Although there is some variation among vertebrates in MHC gene structure, MHC class II β genes in the amphibian Xenopus laevis are made up of six exons with an exon-intron organization similar to that of a typical mammalian class II β gene. Exon 2 encodes the β - 1 domain which includes most of the antigen binding sites (ABS) of the beta domain and is the most polymorphic region of the gene [2], [3]. Due to high selective pressure on MHC genes, variation tends to be high, particularly at the ABS [4]. These sites encode amino acid residues involved in the recognition and binding of foreign peptides [5].
Frequency dependent selection, where bearers of common alleles are likely to be more susceptible to diseases and specific alleles can confer resistance [6], [7] or heterozygote advantage [8], [9] are believed to be common mechanisms involved in shaping MHC diversity. Low diversity at MHC loci has been implicated in elevating vulnerability to disease [10], [11], though several species have not shown demonstrable ill effects from limited MHC variation [12], [13]. Single MHC class I or II alleles confer resistance to specific diseases in many taxa [14], [15], [16] and some studies suggest that it is the prevalence of parasites which maintain high levels of MHC variation [17], [18], [19]. However, in many cases stochastic events, rather than selection influence MHC variation and variation at neutral markers is often correlated with that of MHC loci, e.g. [11], [20], [21]. The mechanisms driving MHC evolution have therefore not been fully resolved. Natural selection, demographic processes such as drift and gene flow as well as mutation rate are all likely to play a role.
Few studies have investigated MHC variation and neutral genetic variation across entire biographical ranges of species and most of these involve only few populations or species within limited ranges [12], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. It is therefore particularly interesting to compare diversity at neutral markers and functionally important genes in species at wide biogeographical scales. In particular, species with large ranges and which have been subjected to population bottlenecks in areas of their distribution are ideal for comparisons of neutral and adaptive genetic variation. Postglacial expansion of amphibians from glacial refugia provides useful examples. Most European species survived the last glaciations, peaking around 20,000 years ago, in southern refugia from which they subsequently colonised northern Europe in the postglacial Holocene period [27]. Furthermore, amphibians are experiencing high rates of global decline [28], [29], mainly due to habitat degradation and loss [30] but also because of emerging infectious diseases such as the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd, [31]). This pathogen precipitated the decline of at least two species in parts of Iberia [32], but many other infected species appear largely unaffected [33], [34], [35]. As MHC class II molecules play an important role in mounting acquired immune responses to fungi, and MHC variability is often associated with immunocompetence [36], it is likely that MHC- dependent resistance mechanisms contribute to fighting Bd infections [37]. A recent study on leopard frogs, for example, showed an association between MHC class II genotypes and survival of Bd infections [38]. Information on MHC loci, and MHC class II β 1 genes in particular, is now available for several amphibians including members of the genus Bombina, Alytes [39], Rana [40], [41], Bufo [42], [43], Espadarana and Sachatamia [44] and Triturus [12], [45], as well as for model organisms such as Xenopus, Silurana and Ambystoma [46], [47], [48], [49].
Here we report the results of a study of MHC and microsatellite diversity across the entire biogeographical range of Bufo calamita, an amphibian with glacial refugia in Iberia and south-west France, which now also inhabits much of north and central Europe [50]. We recently characterized the entire exon 2 of an expressed MHC class II β locus (locus B, [43]) in B. calamita and here we provide evidence that this locus is or has been under selection in this species. We then tested the hypothesis that effects of selection on this locus during postglacial expansion resulted in patterns of diversity different from those of microsatellites, which were presumed to be primarily consequent on genetic drift.
Materials and Methods
Sampling Strategy
For MHC analyses we extracted DNA from 325 individuals from 17 populations of B. calamita distributed over the entire species’ range (see Figure 1 and Table 1). Thirteen of those populations were used in previous studies of microsatellite diversity [50], [51] but samples from five further populations used in those studies were no longer available (grey circles in Figure 1). We therefore supplemented the study with samples from four new sites (white circles in Figure 1) to maintain coverage of the full biogeographic range. In all cases free swimming tadpoles (Gosner stages 25–30) were sampled and instantly sacrificed by immersion in ethanol (a method approved by the British Home Office). All UK samples were authorized and licensed by Natural England, the statutory government organisation responsible for wildlife conservation. Bufo calamita is a protected species in Britain and in some of the other countries providing samples. In all cases the appropriate permissions were obtained by the samplers in those countries. Bufo calamita is a vertebrate but no ethical permissions were required for this study because it only required instant sacrifice of larvae, which does not come under ethical coding since no manipulations, mutilations or other stresses were applied. DNA extractions were performed as described in Zeisset & Beebee [40]. Four of the 17 populations were located in the glacial refugium area (REF, as per [12]) of Iberia and southern France, while the other 13 were located in the postglacial expansion area (PGE, as per [12]), all as inferred from mtDNA haplotype diversity [50].
Table 1. Summary statistics for MHC and microsatellite loci.
Populations | Microsatellites | MHC | ||||||||
Postglacial expansion (PGE) areas: | N | Nalleles (SD) | NP | R | HE | N | Nalleles | NP | R | HE |
NW England (14) | 40 | 2.1 (1.46) | 0 | 2.0 | 0.30 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.49 |
SE England (15) | 39 | 2.4 (0.98) | 0 | 2.1 | 0.34 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.50 |
Ireland (13) | 40 | 2.1 (1.35) | 0 | 1.9 | 0.29 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
NW France (10) | 40 | 2.0 (1.16) | 0 | 1.9 | 0.26 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1.8 | 0.08 |
NW France (11) | 31 | 4.4 (1.62) | 3 | 3.3 | 0.46 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 2.6 | 0.52 |
NW France (12) | 39 | 3.4 (1.51) | 0 | 3.2 | 0.47 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 2.9 | 0.53 |
Netherlands (16) | 40 | 2.7 (1.70) | 1 | 2.5 | 0.36 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1.5 | 0.06 |
Germany (17) | 40 | 3.6 (2.44) | 3 | 3.1 | 0.46 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 3.0 | 0.57 |
Poland (18 & 19) | 40 | 1.9 (0.69) | 0 | 1.7 | 0.21 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1.9 | 0.15 |
Estonia (22) | 37 | 1.4 (0.79) | 1 | 1.4 | 0.14 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
Denmark (20) | 37 | 1.29 (0.49) | 0 | 1.3 | 0.11 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
Sweden (21) | 40 | 1.7 (0.95) | 0 | 1.5 | 0.14 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.51 |
Switzerland (8 & 9) | 40 | 2.86 (0.69) | 1 | 2.7 | 0.50 | 30 | 5 | 3 | 3.5 | 0.60 |
PGE means (SD) | 38.7 (2.46) | 2.5 (1.22) | 0.69 (0.99) | 2.2 (0.69) | 0.31 (0.14) | 19.7 (6.68) | 2.2 (1.07) | 0.38 (0.84) | 2.0 (0.80) | 0.31 (0.26) |
PGE total numbers | 503 | 64 | 9 | – | – | 256 | 12 | 5 | – | – |
Refugia (REF) areas | N | Nalleles (SD) | NP | R | HE | N | Nalleles | NP | R | HE |
SW France (6) | 16 | 5.3 (1.11) | 5 | 4.6 | 0.67 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 5.6 | 0.81 |
SE Spain (4) | 11 | 4.7 (1.60) | 1 | 4.5 | 0.68 | – | – | – | – | – |
N Spain (5) | 12 | 4.7 (1.11) | 5 | 4.6 | 0.73 | – | – | – | – | – |
SW Spain (2) | 36 | 9.3 (2.56) | 12 | 6.7 | 0.79 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 4.0 | 0.78 |
SW Spain (3) | – | – | – | – | – | 13 | 14 | 11 | 10.8 | 0.91 |
Portugal (1) | – | – | – | – | – | 33 | 12 | 8 | 7.6 | 0.84 |
SE France (7) | 22 | 5.9 (1.95) | 3 | 4.9 | 0.65 | – | – | – | – | – |
REF means (SD) | 19.4 (9.16) | 6.0 (1.67) | 5.2 (3.65) | 5.0 (0.93) | 0.70 (0.06) | 17.3 (9.18) | 8.8 (4.99) | 5.25 (4.43) | 7 (2.93) | 0.84 (0.06) |
REF total numbers | 97 | 99 | 26 | – | – | 69 | 30 | 21 | – | – |
Summary statistics for MHC and microsatellite loci of B. calamita populations. The numbers in the population column refer to sampling sites in Figure 1. N is sample size and N alleles is mean number of alleles with standard deviations given for microsatellite loci, NP is the number of population- specific alleles occurring only in one population, R is the allelic richness adjusted to the minimum sample size of nine individuals. HE is mean expected heterozygosity.
MHC Genotyping
MHC class II locus B β chain exon 2 sequences of B. calamita were amplified using primers located in the flanking intron regions. This is the only functional MHC class II locus thus far identified in B. calamita [42], [43]. The forward primer 2F347 (GTGACCCTCTGCTCTCCATT) with reverse primer 2R307b (ATAATTCAGTATATACAGGGTCTCACC) amplified a sequence of 279–282 base pairs (excluding primers). The 20 µl PCRs contained approximately 25 ng DNA, 0.4 µM of each primer, 100 µM dNTPs, 1x reaction buffer and 0.5 U of New England Biolabs Taq DNA polymerase. Thermal cycling consisted of an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 3 min and a touchdown protocol with a total of 35 cycles and ending with a elongation step of 72°C for 10 min. Each cycle started with a denaturation step of 94°C for 30 sec and ended with an elongation step of 72°C for 40 sec. Annealing temperatures consisted of 2 cycles at 62°C, 2 cycles at 60°C, 2 cycles at 58°C and 29 cycles at 56°C, each for 30 sec. Individual alleles were identified by SSCP analysis as described in Zeisset & Beebee [40]. Bands were excised from gels, re-amplified following Sunnucks et al. [52] and sent away for sequencing (Macrogen, Korea or Oxford Biochemistry Dept, UK). To reduce the risk of including PCR artefacts each allele was sequenced at least twice, either from different individuals or from two separate PCRs.
Microsatellite Data
For comparative purposes we used microsatellite data obtained in previous studies from eight polymorphic loci in 600 individuals sampled from 18 populations [50], [51] and distributed over the entire biogeographical range (Figure 1, Table 1). To minimize PCR and scoring errors a small subset of samples with high incidences of non-amplification or difficult to score alleles were run twice. Microsatellite data were tested for the presence of null alleles and scoring errors using Micro-Checker 2.2.3 [53] and for effects of selection using the FST outlier approach implemented in LOSITAN [54], [55].
MHC Sequence Analysis
To determine intron/exon boundaries we combined the putative intron and exon sequences (Genbank nos.: JX258913 and JX258914) to obtain a 532 base pair sequence of B. calamita locus B allele ‘Buca B2’ and used NNSPLICE version 0.9 [56], as implemented on http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html, to predict splice sites.
Sequences were aligned and edited manually using Bioedit v. 7.0.9 [57]. The relative rates of non-synonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) base pair substitutions were calculated according to Nei & Gojobori [58] applying the Jukes Cantor correction [59] for multiple hits in Mega 5 [60]. This was done for all sites and just for putative antigen binding sites (ABS), assuming functional congruence to human ABS identified by Tong et al. [61]. We used a Z-test [62] for positive selection. We also calculated average pairwise nucleotide distances (Kimura 2-parameter model, K2P) and Poisson-corrected amino acid distances [63] for ABS, non-ABS and all sites in Mega 5 with 1000 bootstrap replicates to calculate standard errors for the distance measures.
To identify specific sites under selection we used two new methods: a mixed effects model of evolution (MEME) to identify instances of both episodic and transient positive selection at individual sites [64] as well as a fast unbiased Bayesian approximation (FUBAR), both implemented on http://www.datamonkey.org [65]. MEME is superior at detecting sites where episodic positive selection is likely to be occurring [64]. For these analyses we used 282 bp (94 amino acids) of 57 locus B alleles of three species, B.calamita, Bufo bufo and Bufo (Pseudoepidalea) viridis (Genbank nos.: HQ388288, HQ388291, JX258874–JX258913, JX046488–JX046501, JX258919). After testing for recombination, a phylogenetic tree was inferred and used as the input for selection on particular codons using the two methods.
To investigate the evolutionary relationship between the MHC loci in the three Bufo species we used three methods were to test for signatures of recombination. This analysis was carried out for 282 bp of exon 2 sequence as well as for the 157 bp we used in phylogenetic tree reconstruction to investigate the effects recombination may have on tree construction. For this analysis we also included B. calamita, B. bufo and B. viridis locus A alleles (locus A is a putative non-functional locus, identified in an earlier study [43], (Genbank nos.: JX258916, JX283352, JX283353, JX258920, JX046502–JX046504) and used GENECONV [66] and MaxChi2 [67], both implemented in RDP3.44 [68]. Both of these methods performed well in a comparison of 14 recombination detection methods [69]. We applied Bonferroni correction for multiple tests and used automask sequences to optimize our dataset and to reduce the severity of the multiple testing correction. In addition we used a genetic algorithm recombination detection method (GARD; [70]), as implemented on http://www.datamonkey.org/GARD.
MHC Phylogeny
We constructed a phylogenetic tree to visualize the relationship between anuran MHC class II β exon 2 alleles based on a total of 51 unique exon 2 sequences from 14 species: Bufo bufo, B. viridis, Bombina bombina, B. variagata, B. pachypus, Alytes obstetricans, Xenopus laevis, Rana temporaria, R. catesbeiana, R. yavapaiensis, R. clamitans. R. sylvatica, Sachatamia ilex and Espadarana prosoblepon [43], [39], [41], [2], [46], [44] in the NCBI database, in addition to a selection of our own from this study chosen to include the some of the most diverse sequences. Sequences were trimmed to 157 bp to match available data from the published exon 2 sequences. The urodele Ambystoma tigrinum and Triturus cristatus MHC sequences were included as outgroups. To investigate the evolutionary relationship among the 38 B. calamita locus B sequences from this study we constructed another phylogenetic tree, using 282 bp of sequence and X. laevis as an outgroup. For both trees evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model [71] in Mega 5 [60]. Other tree building methods were also tested and provided congruent results (data not shown). A consensus tree was inferred from 1000 replicates [72]. As recombination and possible gene duplication can affect phylogenetic trees we also constructed a phylogenetic network using the program SplitsTree4, which can account for conflicting signals from recombination and gene duplication [73], [74] for the B. calamita MHC class II locus B. We used Jukes-Cantor distances and the Neighbor-Net method. For a network depicting the relationship between all three Bufo species’ MHC sequences see [43].
Population Genetics
Compliance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in each population was assessed for microsatellite and MHC loci by applying the exact tests in Genepop 4.0.10 [75]. Linkage disequilibrium of the microsatellite markers was also tested in Genepop.
F-statistics [76], pairwise multilocus permutation tests of population differentiation, expected heterozygosity (HE) and allelic richness (i.e. the mean number of alleles corrected for samples size; R), were estimated for each population and overall in FSTAT 2.9.3.2 [77]. We used FST primarily as a way to measure the level of differentiation between populations. As FST may be affected by highly variable markers such as microsatellites we also calculated DEST [78] in GenAlEx 6.5b3 [79], [80]. Pairwise comparisons of FST and DEST within and between each class of loci, as well as isolation by distance (using ln distance vs. FST/1−FST), were made using the Mantel test facility in Genepop with 1000 permutations. Distances were measured using Google Earth between all sampling sites north of the Pyrenees (the region of postglacial expansion) that were not separated by sea, as most amphibians cannot survive seawater exposure. Distances were otherwise direct (Euclidean) allowing for bends to avoid sea water where necessary.
To investigate how variation was partitioned within and among REF and PGE populations we carried out an AMOVA in Arlequin v. 3.5 [81] for microsatellite and MHC data.
Phylogeographic relationships among the populations based on allele frequencies were determined separately for microsatellite and MHC data using Phylip v. 3.66 [82]. The analysis employed Cavalli-Sforza chord distances and the UPGMA algorithm with 1000 bootstraps for the multilocus microsatellite data.
Standard statistical tests for differences in allelic richness (R) and expected heterozygosity (HE) between REF and PGE populations as well as correlations between microsatellite and MHC data and microsatellite and allelic richness (R) and geographic distance were carried out using Statistix7 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, USA).
Results
MHC Locus B Characteristics
Splice site analysis for locus B predicted intron/exon boundaries between base pairs 3 and 4 after the 3′ end of the forward primer binding site and between base pairs 281 and 282 (2 bp into the reverse primer binding site), making the putative exon 279 base pairs long. These sites corresponded to exon 2 boundaries found in some other amphibian species [39]. There was evidence of historical positive natural selection at ABS sites in B. calamita (P = 0.002, Z = 2.973). Using MEME (P<0.1) we identified 23 positively selected codons in exon 2 and using FUBAR with a posterior probability >90% we found 19. Codons identified by both methods largely corresponded to putative antigen binding sites (ABS) as defined by Brown et al. [83] and Tong et al. [61] for the human MHC locus HLA-DRB (Figure 2). Average nucleotide distance over all nucleotide sequence pairs in exon 2 was 0.094 (SE 0.012) in B. calamita. Average amino acid distance at this locus was 0.149 (SE 0.028). Nucleotide and amino acid distances were much higher in the putative ABS (nucleotide: 0.376, SE 0.067; amino acid: 0.787, SE 0.159) than in non-ABS (nucleotide: 0.058, SE 0.010; amino acid: 0.083, SE 0.021) sites.
Of the 38 unique MHC class II exon 2 DNA sequences (Genbank nos.: HQ3882288, HQ388289, JX258875–JX258911) from locus B in 17 populations of B. calamita, ten showed evidence of a recombination event including a codon insertion towards the 3′ end resulting in the addition of threonine. Five had a deletion of three nucleotides which corresponded to a codon deletion in the MHC class II DAB alleles of the great crested newt, Triturus cristatus (Trcr-DAB*06, 08, 12, 15, 17. 19, 20 and 24, [84]) in Europe, as well as in the glass frog Espadarna prosoblepon (Espr-DRB*26, [44]) in Central America. In all three species phenylalanine or tyrosine was lost as well as a number of others in the case of the glass frog.
Recombination tests GeneConv and MaxChi detected between two and three recombination events among all the whole exon 2 MHC sequences, with between five and 15 recombination signals. GARD on the other hand detected no evidence of recombination. For the 157 bp sequences used in phylogenetic tree reconstruction only MaxChi detected one recombination event, with 13 recombination signals.
Amphibian MHC class II exon 2 sequences formed some strongly supported clusters (Figure 3A). Rana, Xenopus and Discoglossoidea (Bombina and Alytes species) sequences all formed separate groups. Within those groups there was also strong support for some branches separating species. The Central American Sachatamia and Espadarana clustered strongly with the European Bufo. Both the phylogenetic network (Figure S1) and the tree (Figure 3B) produced congruent results for the B. calamita MHC class II B locus.
Population Genetics
For the MHC locus there were a total of 12 alleles in 256 individuals in the PGE group, but 30 alleles in 69 individuals in the REF group. There was a remarkably high number of population- specific alleles (25 out of 38, 66%) in the MHC data, each of which was found in a single population (Table 1). Twenty six alleles (68%) including 20 population- specific alleles (80%) were only found in the REF group and eight alleles (five population- specific) only in the PGE group. Only four alleles (10%) occurred in both groups, though in the REF group they were only found in the SW France population and not in any of the Iberian populations. None of the alleles found in Iberia occurred north of the Pyrenees and vice versa. However, the alleles in the REF and PGE groups did not cluster as similar sequences (Figure 3B) implying a common ancient ancestry for the alleles occurring in both groups combined. Three of the 17 populations (Germany, Spain (Doñana) and Portugal) were not in HWE at the MHC locus, in all cases due to a homozygote excess. As selection can generate divergence from HWE, we did not exclude these populations from further analysis. Although the presence of null alleles could not be ruled out, the fact that the primers were located in relatively conserved intron sequences means that null alleles are unlikely to be the cause of the deviation from HWE. Among the microsatellites LOSITAN identified one locus (Bcalµ8) as possibly affected by positive selection and we therefore excluded this marker from subsequent analysis. The number of alleles in the remaining seven microsatellite loci ranged from 8 (Bcalµ2) to 25 (Bcalµ3). Diversity measures for microsatellite and MHC loci are given in Table 1 and allele frequencies in Table A in File S1. Almost all of the microsatellite alleles were encountered at least twice, either in the same or in different populations and errors due to PCR or scoring are likely to be small. PCR repeats of individuals never gave conflicting results. Again, diversity was lower in the PGE group than in the REF group. There were 35 population- specific microsatellite alleles out of a total of 118 (30%) across all loci. A total of 52 alleles (44%, range 29–50%) including 26 population- specific alleles (74%) were found only in the REF group and 16 alleles (nine private) only in the PGE group. Across all loci fifty alleles (42%, range 25–50%) occurred in both groups. No microsatellite locus therefore showed allelic differentiation north and south of the Pyrenees as great as that shown by the MHC locus.
Twenty-four of 126 population × microsatellite loci comparisons showed significant deviations from HWE after Bonferroni correction. In all cases this was due to a homozygote excess and Micro-Checker indicated the possibility of null alleles in several populations at Bcalµ1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 with estimated frequencies ranging from 0.09 to 0.32 ([85], estimator 1; Table B in File S1). The number of loci with homozygote excess was particularly high in the German and Spanish (Seville) populations. Null alleles may therefore be a cause of the deviation from HWE. Another possible explanation is that in some populations a proportion of the samples consisted of siblings, although measures were taken to avoid sampling family groups [50]. However, as this was a small proportion of the total number of populations we did not exclude these from further analysis (see also [50]).
After Bonferroni corrections there were no cases of linkage disequilibrium among the loci.
Comparison of MHC and Microsatellite Variation
For both microsatellite and MHC markers most variation was accounted for at the within-population level (49% and 42% respectively) or among populations within REF and PGE groups (39% and 51% respectively, Table 2). However, the mean number of alleles corrected for sample size (allelic richness, R) was significantly higher in the REF than in the PGE for both microsatellite and MHC loci (MHC: χ2 = 4.20, DF = 1, P = 0.0404; microsatellites: χ2 = 6.92, DF = 1, P = 0.0085). MHC and microsatellite allelic richness was significantly correlated among populations where both types of loci were sampled (Figure 4A, rs = 0.8371, n = 15, P = 0.0001). Microsatellite and MHC allelic richness outside Iberia declined with distance from the SW France refugium area (Figure 4B, rs = −0.7899, n = 14, P = 0.0013). Expected heterozygosity between the types of loci was also significantly correlated (Figure 4C, rs = 0.8312, n = 15, P = 0.0002). None of the correlations were unduly influenced by populations with a significant amount of null alleles (see Figure 4A and Figure 4C as well as Table A and Table B in File S1) and the correlations between heterozygosity and allelic richness for both types of loci were also significant excluding SW Spain and Germany from the analysis (HE: rs = 0.7552, n = 13, P = 0.0001; R: rs = 0.7872, n = 13, P = 0.000). Average FIS values of MHC and microsatellite loci across all populations in this PGE zone were low in both cases (0.019 and 0.028 respectively) and not significantly different (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.603).
Table 2. AMOVA results for MHC and microsatellite loci.
Among groups | Among populations within groups | Within populations | |
microsatellites | 11.86* | 39.44* | 48.69* |
MHC | 6.37* | 42.38* | 51.25 ns |
Percentage of variation explained by among group (PGE and REF), among population within groups and within population. Associated significance values of variance components based on 1023 permutations: ns = non significant, * = P<0.001.
Pairwise FST comparisons among populations indicated significant population differentiation between 128 of the 136 population comparisons for MHC loci and between all but three for the microsatellite data (see Table S1). Using Mantel tests, pairwise FST and DEST were significantly intercorrelated both for MHC and microsatellite loci for the PGE region including SW France (MHC: rs = 0.6372, n = 105, P<0.0001; microsatellite: rs = 0.2548, n = 105, P = 0.0089). However, in several cases where geographical separation was high, MHC DEST = 1 thus providing incomplete resolution of differentiation level. Subsequent comparisons therefore focused on pairwise FST estimates which were correlated between MHC and microsatellite loci (rs = 0.3128, n = 105, P = 0.0012). Excluding Iberian populations, among areas analysed for both microsatellites and MHC genotypes and not separated by seawater (n = 8; Bordeaux, SW France; Zurich, Switzerland; Carnac, France; Penmarch, France; Cherbourg, France; Halle, Germany; Bukowno/Bielowieza, Poland; Parnu, Estonia), the correlation between MHC and microsatellite pairwise FST estimates was also strong (rs = 0.432, P = 0.025). Mean pairwise FST estimates in this region were similar for both types of loci (0.428 for microsatellites, 0.487 for MHC) and there was significant isolation by distance (IBD, P<0.0001 in both cases). However, the strength of IBD was greater for MHC than for microsatellites as shown using untransformed FST and distance estimates in Figure 5. Regression slopes for the two loci were significantly different (F = 6.14, P = 0.0165). This strongly indicates a role of selection in shaping MHC diversity, as the effects of drift on microsatellite FST estimates are expected to be greater than those on MHC loci, due to their higher mutation rates.
Phylogeographic trees based on microsatellite and MHC allele frequencies were broadly congruent (Figure 6). However, allele frequencies and distributions in the PGE region were significantly different between the loci (Figure 7). We excluded colour coding for the MHC locus in the Iberian populations from this comparison, as they do not share any alleles with the other populations and contain a large number of population specific alleles. For a full comparison see Table A in File S1 for allele frequencies at all loci in all populations. Certain MHC alleles were common in adjacent geographic areas (e.g Buca B2 in Ireland, UK, Netherlands, Germany and Sweden, Buca B5 in Sweden, Denmark, Estonia, Poland, Switzerland and Germany) (Figure 7A). No such pattern could be discerned for the most polymorphic microsatellite locus Bcalµ3 (Figure 7B).
Discussion
Nucleotide distances in the MHC locus (0.094) were comparable to those found in other amphibian species, where diversity ranged from 0.062 in Rana warszewitschii to 0.155 in R. catesbeiana [41], [39], [40]. Many of the positively selected sites we identified in exon 2 corresponded to those involved in peptide binding in equivalent human MHC class II proteins [83], [61]. Many of these sites were congruent with human ABS identified by either Tong et al. [61] or Brown et al. [83] (Figure 2). The others were located outside the human ABS and some of the human ABSs were not identified as positively selected sites in the Bufo MHC class II loci. Similar findings have been reported by others (e.g. [86], [87], [84], [41]), indicating that species- specific selection pressures were acting on the MHC genes. Two methods for detecting recombination in the Bufo MHC sequences indicated its occurrence in these species. This may explain the adjacent intron 2 sequence similarity found at locus A and B within B. calamita [43]. Although our phylogenetic analysis was based on only a short DNA sequence, it does reflect the current view of the phylogenetic relationship of amphibians [88], [89], [90]. Interestingly the Central American glass frog Espadarana prosoblepon, which clustered with Bufo in our phylogenetic tree, also showed remarkable sequence similarity to Bufo MHC sequences in the first 200 bp of intron 2, which basically consists of a 100 bp repeat [43], [44]. Although we did not sequence intron 2 of B. viridis or B. bufo the fact that the intron- specific primers amplify MHC loci in these species indicates at least some conservation at introns across taxa [43]. Blast searches did not find these sequences elsewhere. Such conservation across widely separate taxa may indicate some functional significance of this sequence. For example, the first 130 bp of intron 2 sequences of New World ranid species (Rana catesbeiana, R. clamitans, R. pipiens, R. sylvatica, R. yavapaiensis, R. warszweitschii, R. palustris; [41]) were also remarkably conserved across species, though no repeat was detected. Sato et al. [91] analysed 114 intron 2 sequences of passerine bird species and found that most of them largely consisted of repeat sequences, with a 10 bp repeat being particularly common. In addition they found a 60–80 bp DNA segment in intron 2 that occurred in noncoding segments of MHC sequences in a number of other passerine bird species. The function or role of repetitive sequences or conserved elements in intron 2 is not yet clear but clearly requires further study.
Of particular interest within the B. calamita MHC were alleles (all in Iberian REF populations) that had a codon deletion at the same position as found in the great crested newt Triturus cristatus in Romanian REF populations [12] as well as in the glass frog Espadarna prosoblepon (Espr-DRB*26, [44]) in Central America. It may be that selection pressure in colder climates eliminated these alleles from populations in North European amphibians, or that they confer advantages in warmer climates. The loss of these alleles by drift as populations expanded north cannot be ruled out but seems a remarkable coincidence for two unrelated taxa.
There was a clear difference in the levels of both MHC and microsatellite diversity between the REF and the PGE populations of B. calamita. The lack of shared MHC alleles between the REF and PGE populations was surprising and it is possible more shared alleles may be found in other REF populations. Nevertheless, for comparison, Babik et al. [12] found that populations of the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) in post glacial expansion (PGE) areas possessed a subset of alleles from the refugia (REF) populations, when they compared three PGE populations from across Europe to only four small REF populations from Romania. Our data support the theory that natterjack toads survived the Weichselian glacial maximum 20 000 years BP in at least one north European refuge, most likely in France, and colonized northern Europe from there [50]. In B. calamita and T. cristatus variation of microsatellite and MHC loci was high in the REF groups and much lower in the PGE groups. A decrease in allelic diversity from southern to northern Europe is well documented in neutral loci (e.g. [92]). The high similarity in diversity distribution (decreasing in the PGE area as a function of distance from the REF area) and in phylogeographic patterns between the two types of loci imply that drift rather than selection was the dominant influence on MHC allelic variation at the biogeographic range scale. Mean FIS estimates were close to zero for both classes of loci, with no signal of heterozygote excess as an indicator of diversifying selection in the MHC locus. A recent meta-analysis of the roles of natural selection and genetic drift in shaping MHC variation concluded that selection combined with drift during population bottlenecks can result in loss of MHC polymorphism at even greater rates than neutral genetic diversity [93]. Other studies have shown that microsatellite and MHC diversity is lost in similar proportions over time, with balancing selection unable to mitigate genetic drift [94] and that MHC diversity declines more steeply than microsatellite diversity after a bottleneck [95]. However, inconsistencies remain and in some cases selection can maintain polymorphism at MHC loci during population bottlenecks (e.g. [96]).
When comparing two different marker systems such as MHC loci and microsatellites it is important to consider the potential differences in the ages of observed alleles due to the higher mutation rates of microsatellites and potential back mutations. Microsatellite mutation rates in B. calamita have been estimated at a relatively low 1×10−5 [50], whereas the mutation rate at the DRB1 locus in chimpanzees is estimated to be 1.31×10−9 per site per year [97]. Assuming a similar mutation rate for the MHC locus B in B. calamita this would give a mutation rate of 1.1×10−6 for 279 bp of exon 2 per generation (three years), not much different from that of the microsatellites. Microsatellite mutation rates increase with microsatellite length and contractions become more likely than expansions as length increases [98]. As natterjack microsatellite length was generally higher in the PGE than in the REF area [50] it is possible that some variation was masked by back mutations generating homoplasy. However, the natterjack microsatellites were relatively short (mostly around 10–20 repeats with a maximum of 29 for Bcalµ3) and significant homoplasy was considered unlikely.
Despite the likely dominance of drift effects on B. calamita MHC variation across the species’ range there were some interesting differences between MHC and microsatellite genotype distributions that may imply an additional, albeit minor role of selection in structuring the MHC locus at this large geographical scale. MHC alleles were more sharply differentiated between the REF and PGE regions than were the microsatellite alleles. Isolation by distance effects in those parts of the mainland Europe PGE area where gene flow remained possible after postglacial sea level rise was significantly stronger for the MHC than for the microsatellite loci. The commonest MHC alleles in the PGE group were, on average, at higher frequency and more geographically clustered than the commonest alleles in the microsatellite locus with the most comparable allelic diversity. This pattern difference might imply weak effects of selection reflected in patterns of common MHC allele abundance in specific regions, such as north-west France, north-central Europe and eastern Europe, perhaps in turn reflecting local differences in pathogen communities. Pathogens often exhibit a ‘latitudinal diversity gradient’, with high diversity at the equator decreasing towards the poles [99]. For example, temperature is an indirect selective mechanism maintaining MHC diversity in wild salmon [18]. Therefore it is possible that the higher MHC diversity in the southern populations of B. calamita is maintained by higher pathogen- mediated selection pressure, but further studies into actual difference of pathogen prevalence in the various regions are needed to test this hypothesis.
Overall, our evidence clearly implies a stronger influence of drift than selection on this B. calamita MHC locus at the biogeographical scale. This is essentially similar to the situation discovered with a comparable study of another widespread European amphibian, Triturus cristatus [12]. Comparison of MHC and neutral loci in four populations of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) also failed to detect any evidence of selection acting on the MHC locus, although in this study a MHC-embedded microsatellite locus was used and it is not clear to what extent this reflected variability in the exon [100]. Marsden et al. [24] also found that although microsatellite diversity and MHC diversity were correlated in African wild dog populations, indicating genetic drift to be a major influencing factor, there were signatures of selection at the MHC locus. The apparent weakness of selective effects may however be influenced by the scale of the study. In Atlantic salmon drift and migration were more important than selection on large geographical scales but at smaller geographical scales the influence of selection was detected at MHC loci [101]. Postglacial colonisation with associated bottlenecks can evidently leave strong signatures of genetic drift long after the event. In contrast to this, the same MHC locus in a B. bufo population translocated over 400 km within the UK adapted within three generations to an allele frequency distribution similar to that of neighbouring populations in the receptor area [102], presumably reflecting selection in favour of the new conditions. A recent phylogeographic study of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) found no spatial genetic structure among populations at MHC loci, but clear differentiation reflecting their major glacial refugia at a mtDNA gene. This may indicate yet another situation in which spatiotemporal variations in selection pressures acting over large areas can mask historical signals of population origins [103]. Other studies have also indicated that the mode and strength of selection acting on MHC diversity varies in time and space [104]. Further studies at small geographical scales including experimental translocations may prove fruitful in the investigation of selection on adaptive variation such as that expected with MHC loci, whilst no doubt further investigations into the role of pathogens in shaping MHC diversity remain necessary in isolating the evolutionary forces shaping MHC diversity.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
Thanks to those who provided samples in the earlier studies and to Benedikt Schmidt (Switzerland), Miguel Tejedo (Spain), Mirjam van de Vliet (Portugal), Wieslaw Babik and Maciej Bonk (Poland) for providing new samples for the present work. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Leverhulme trust (http://www.leverhulme.ac.uk). Grant number: F/00230/AH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Klein J, Sato A (1998) Birth of the major histocompatibility complex. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 47: 199–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kobari F, Kasahara M, Tochinai S (1995) Structure and evolution of Xenopus laevis MHC class II beta-chain gene. Zoological Science (Tokyo) 12: 38. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kobari F, Sato K, Shum BP, Tochinai S, Katagiri M, et al. (1995) Exon-intron organization of Xenopus MHC class-II beta-chain genes. Immunogenetics 42: 376–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hedrick PW (1994) Evolutionary genetics of the major histocompatibility complex. American Naturalist 143: 945–964. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Garrigan D, Hedrick PW (2003) Perspective: detecting adaptive molecular polymorphism: lessons from the MHC. Evolution 57: 1707–1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Langefors A, Lohm J, Grahn M, Andersen O, von Schantz T (2001) Association between major histocompatibility complex class IIB alleles and resistance to Aeromonas salmonicida in Atlantic salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268: 479–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Meyer-Lucht Y, Sommer S (2005) MHC diversity and the association to nematode parasitism in the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). Molecular Ecology 14: 2233–2244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Froeschke G, Sommer S (2005) MHC Class II DRB variability and parasite load in the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) in the southern Kalahari. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1254–1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Simkova A, Ottova E, Morand S (2006) MHC variability, life-traits and parasite diversity of European cyprinid fish. Evolutionary Ecology 20: 465–477. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cheng Y, Sanderson C, Jones M, Belov K (2012) Low MHC class II diversity in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii). Immunogenetics 64: 525–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hedrick PW (2001) Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 629–636. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Babik W, Pabijan M, Arntzen JW, Cogalniceanu D, Durka W, et al. (2009) Long-term survival of a urodele amphibian despite depleted major histocompatibility complex variation. Molecular Ecology 18: 769–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ellegren H, Hartman G, Johansson M, Andersson L (1993) Major histocompatibility complex monomorphism and low levels of DNA fingerprinting variability in a reintroduced and rapidly expanding population of beavers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90: 8150–8153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Piertney SB, Oliver MK (2005) The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 96: 7–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bonneaud C, Perez-Tris J, Federici P, Chastel O, Sorci G (2006) Major histocompatibility alleles associated with local resistance to malaria in a passerine. Evolution 60: 383–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sommer S (2005) The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation. Frontiers in Zoology 2: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Kalbe M (2003) Multiple parasites are driving major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the wild. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 224–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dionne M, Miller KM, Dodson JJ, Caron F, Bernatchez L (2007) Clinal variation in MHC diversity with temperature: evidence for the role of host–pathogen interaction on local adaptation in Atlantic salmon. Evolution 61: 2154–2164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. de Bellocq JG, Charbonnel N, Morand S (2008) Coevolutionary relationship between helminth diversity and MHC class II polymorphism in rodents. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1144–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Campos JL, Posada D, Moran P (2006) Genetic variation at MHC, mitochondrial and microsatellite loci in isolated populations of Brown trout (Salmo trutta). Conservation Genetics 7: 515–530. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2010) Larval fitness, microsatellite diversity and MHC class II diversity in common frog (Rana temporaria) populations. Heredity 104: 423–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ploshnitsa AI, Goltsman ME, Macdonald DW, Kennedy LJ, Sommer S (2012) Impact of historical founder effects and a recent bottleneck on MHC variability in commander arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus). Ecology and Evolution 2: 165–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shafer ABA, Fan CW, Côté SD, Coltman DW (2012) (Lack of) Genetic diversity in immune genes predates glacial isolation in the North American mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus). Journal of Heredity 103: 371–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Marsden CD, Woodroffe R, Mills MGL, McNutt JW, Creel S, et al. (2012) Spatial and temporal patterns of neutral and adaptive genetic variation in the endangered African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Molecular Ecology 21: 1379–1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lillie M, Woodward RE, Sanderson CE, Eldridge MDB, Belov K (2012) Diversity at the major histocompatibility complex class II in the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus . Journal of Heredity 103: 467–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Osborne AJ, Zavodna M, Chilvers BL, Robertson BC, Negro SS, et al. (2013) Extensive variation at MHC DRB in the New Zealand sea lion (Phocarctos hookeri) provides evidence for balancing selection. Heredity 111: 44–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2008) Amphibian phylogeography: a model for understanding historical aspects of species distributions. Heredity 101: 109–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, et al. (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783–1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA (2005) The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology? Biological Conservation 125: 271–285. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000) Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404: 752–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Fisher MC, Garner TWJ, Walker SF (2009) Global Emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and amphibian chytridiomycosis in space, time, and host. Annual Review of Microbiology 63: 291–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Walker SF, Bosch J, Gomez V, Garner TWJ, Cunningham AA, et al. (2010) Factors driving pathogenicity vs. prevalence of amphibian panzootic chytridiomycosis in Iberia. Ecology Letters 13: 372–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hidalgo-Vila J, Diaz-Paniagua C, Marchand MA, Cunningham AA (2012) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection of amphibians in the Doñana National Park, Spain. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 98: 113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gahl MK, Longcore JE, Houlahan JE (2012) Varying responses of northeastern North American amphibians to the chytrid pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis . Conservation Biology 26: 135–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Searle CL, Gervasi SS, Hua J, Hammond JI, Relyea RA, et al. (2011) Differential host susceptibility to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, an emerging amphibian pathogen. Conservation Biology 25: 965–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hughes AL, Yeager M (1998) Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. Annual Review of Genetics 32: 415–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Richmond JQ, Savage AE, Zamudio KR, Rosenblum EB (2009) Toward immunogenetic studies of amphibian chytridiomycosis: linking innate and acquired immunity. Bioscience 59: 311–320. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Savage AE, Zamudio KR (2011) MHC genotypes associate with resistance to a frog-killing fungus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108: 16705–16710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hauswaldt JS, Stuckas H, Pfautsch S, Tiedemann R (2007) Molecular characterization of MHC class II in a nonmodel anuran species, the fire-bellied toad Bombina bombina . Immunogenetics 59: 479–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2009) Molecular characterization of major histocompatibility complex class II alleles in the common frog, Rana temporaria . Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 738–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kiemnec-Tyburczy KM, Richmond JQ, Savage AE, Zamudio KR (2010) Selection, trans-species polymorphism, and locus identification of major histocompatibility complex class II beta alleles of New World ranid frogs. Immunogenetics 62: 741–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. May S, Beebee TJC (2009) Characterisation of major histocompatibility complex class II alleles in the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita . Conservation Genetics Resources 1: 415–417. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2013) Bufo MHC class II loci with conserved introns flanking exon 2: cross-species amplification with common primers. Conservation Genetics Resources 5: 211–213. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kiemnec-Tyburczy KM, Zamudio KR (2012) Novel locus-specific primers for major histocompatibility complex class II alleles from glass frogs developed via genome walking. Conservation Genetics Resources 5: 109–111. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Babik W, Pabijan M, Radwan J (2008) Contrasting patterns of variation in MHC loci in the Alpine newt. Molecular Ecology 17: 2339–2355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sato K, Flajnik MF, du Pasquier L, Katagiri M, Kasahara M (1993) Evolution of the Mhc - isolation of class-II beta-chain cDNA clones from the amphibian Xenopus laevis . Journal of Immunology 150: 2831–2843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Laurens V, Chapusot C, Ordonez MD, Bentrari F, Padros MR, et al. (2001) Axolotl MHC class II beta chain: predominance of one allele and alternative splicing of the beta 1 domain. European Journal of Immunology 31: 506–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bos DH, DeWoody JA (2005) Molecular characterization of major histocompatibility complex class II alleles in wild tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum). Immunogenetics 57: 775–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ohta Y, Goetz W, Hossain MZ, Nonaka M, Flajnik MF (2006) Ancestral organization of the MHC revealed in the amphibian Xenopus . Journal of Immunology 176: 3674–3685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rowe G, Harris DJ, Beebee TJC (2006) Lusitania revisited: A phylogeographic analysis of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita across its entire biogeographical range. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 335–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Beebee TJC, Rowe G (2000) Microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad Bufo calamita Laurenti populations: consequences of dispersal from a Pleistocene refugium. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 367–381. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sunnucks P, Wilson ACC, Beheregaray LB, Zenger K, French J, et al. (2000) SSCP is not so difficult: the application and utility of single-stranded conformation polymorphism in evolutionary biology and molecular ecology. Molecular Ecology 9: 1699–1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills PM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA (1996) Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 263: 1619–1626. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G (2008) LOSITAN: A workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a F(st)-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D, Haussler D (1997) Improved splice site detection in Genie. Journal of Computational Biology 4: 311–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 3: 418–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed.), Mammalian protein metabolism, Academic Press, New York, 21–132.
- 60. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Tong JC, Bramson J, Kanduc D, Chow S, Sinha AA, et al. (2006) Modelling the bound conformation of Pemphigus vulgaris-associated peptides to MHC Class II DR and DQ alleles. Immunome Research 2: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
- 63.Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ (eds.) Evolving genes and proteins, Academic Press, New York, 97–166.
- 64. Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K, et al. (2012) Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Delport W, Poon AF, Frost SDW, Kosakovsky Pond SL (2010) Datamonkey 2010: a suite of phylogenetic analysis tools for evolutionary biology. Bioinformatics 26: 2455–2457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM (1999) Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 265: 218–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Smith JM (1992) Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 34: 126–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, Moulton V, Posada D, et al. (2010) RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26: 2462–2463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Posada D (2002) Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Empirical data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 708–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Posada D, Gravenor MB, Woelk CH, Frost SDW (2006) Automated phylogenetic detection of recombination using a genetic algorithm. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1891–1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide-sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bryant D, Moutlon V (2004) Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 255–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Hudson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (Version 1.2) Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486. [Google Scholar]
- 78. Jost L (2008) G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17: 4015–4026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny inference package). Version 3.5C. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
- 83. Brown JH, Jardetzky TS, Gorga JC, Stern LJ, Urban RG, et al. (1993) Three-dimensional structure of the human class-II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1. Nature 364: 33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Babik W (2009) Methods for MHC genotyping in non-model vertebrates. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 237–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Brookfield JFY (1996) A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Molecular Ecology 5: 453–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Meyer-Lucht Y, Otten C, Puettker T, Sommer S (2008) Selection, diversity and evolutionary patterns of the MHC class II DAB in free-ranging neotropical marsupials. BMC Genetics 9: 39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Schad J, Dechmann DKN, Voigt CC, Sommer S (2011) MHC class II DRB diversity, selection pattern and population structure in a neotropical bat species, Noctilio albiventris . Heredity 107: 115–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2011) A large scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61: 543–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Graybeal A (1997) Phylogenetic relationships of bufonid frogs and tests of alternate macroevolutionary hypotheses characterizing their radiation. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 119: 297–338. [Google Scholar]
- 90. Frost DR, Grant T, Fivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, et al. (2006) The Amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1–370. [Google Scholar]
- 91. Sato A, Tichy H, Grant PR, Grant BR, Sato T, et al. (2011) Spectrum of MHC class II variability in Darwin’s finches and their close relatives. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 1943–1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Hewitt GM (1999) Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 87–112. [Google Scholar]
- 93. Sutton J T, Nakagawa S, Robertson BC, Jamieson IG (2011) Disentangling the roles of natural selection and genetic drift in shaping variation at MHC immunity genes. Molecular Ecology 20: 4408–4420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Taylor SS, Jenkins D, Arcese P (2012) Loss of MHC and neutral variation in Peary caribou: genetic drift is not mitigated by balancing selection or exacerbated by MHC allele distributions. PLOS ONE 7(5): e36748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Eimes JA, Bollmer JL, Whittingham LA, Johnson JA, van Oosterhout C, et al. (2011) Rapid loss of MHC class II variation in a bottlenecked population is explained by drift and loss of copy number variation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 1847–1856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Oliver MK, Piertney SB (2012) Selection maintains MHC diversity through a natural population bottleneck. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1713–1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Ohashi J, Naka I, Toyoda A, Takasu M, Tokunaga K, et al. (2006) Estimation of the species-specific mutation rates at the DRB1 locus in humans and chimpanzee. Tissue Antigens 68: 427–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Whittaker JC, Harbord RM, Boxall N, Mackay I, Dawson G, et al. (2003) Likelihood-based estimation of microsatellite mutation rates. Genetics 164: 781–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Guernier V, Mochberg ME, Guégan J-F (2004) Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PLOS Biology. 2: 0740–0746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. André C, Larsson LC, Laikre L, Bekkevold D, Brigham J, et al. (2011) Detecting population structure in a high gene-flow species, Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus): direct, simultaneous evaluation of neutral vs. putatively selected loci. Heredity 106: 270–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Landry C, Bernatchez L (2001) Comparative analysis of population structure across environments and geographical scales at major histocompatibility complex and microsatellite loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Molecular Ecology 10: 2525–2539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2012) Donor population size rather than local adaptation can be a key determinant of amphibian translocation success. Animal Conservation 16: 359–366. [Google Scholar]
- 103. Malé P-JG, Martin J-F, Galan M, Deffontaine V, Bryja J, et al. (2012) Discongruence of Mhc and cytochrome b phylogeographical patterns in Myodes glareolus (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105: 881–899. [Google Scholar]
- 104. Oliver MK, Lambin X, Cornulier T, Piertney S (2009) Spatio-temporal variation in the strength and mode of selection acting on major histocompatibility complex diversity in water vole (Arivicola terrestris) metapopulations. Molecular Ecology 18: 80–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.