Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2014 Apr 29;8(1):125–132. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1699

Thrombocytosis is a significant indictor of hypercoagulability, prognosis and recurrence in gastric cancer

CHANGYUAN HU 1, RENPIN CHEN 2, WENJING CHEN 1, WENYANG PANG 1, XIANGYANG XUE 3, GUANGBAO ZHU 1,, XIAN SHEN 1,
PMCID: PMC4061185  PMID: 24944610

Abstract

Although thrombocytosis has been reported in a variety of cancer types, the standard of thrombocytosis in gastric cancer (GC) and the association between thrombocytosis and the clinicopathological features of patients with GC remain unclear. In the present study, 1,763 GC patients were retrospectively filtered by preoperative thrombocytosis and compared with control group A (n=107) that had benign gastric lesions and control group B (n=100) that were GC patients with a normal platelet (PLT) count. Associations between clinical variables and preoperative PLT counts were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression were used to evaluate the effect of thrombocytosis on prognosis. Sensitivities and specificities of the PLT counts in predicting recurrence were analyzed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The results indicated that the incidence of thrombocytosis in GC patients was higher than in benign gastric lesion patients, with 4.03% of GC patients having a PLT count >400×109/l (P=0.014) and 12.08% had a PLT count >300×109/l (P<0.001). For the patients with a PLT count >400×109/l, the frequency of abnormal PLT counts in GC correlated with tumor size (P<0.001), tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) classification (P=0.002), invasive degree (P=0.003) and D-dimer (P=0.013) and fibrinogen concentrations (P=0.042). Tumor size (P=0.002), TNM classification (P<0.001) and depth of penetration (P=0.001) were independent factors for thrombocytosis. However, thrombocytosis functioned as an independent prognostic factor for GC patients with a PLT count >400×109/l (relative risk, 1.538; 95% confidence interval, 1.041–2.271). In the majority of patients (17/24) with a high preoperative PLT count that decreased to a normal level following resection, PLT levels increased again at recurrence. Sensitivities and specificities of thrombocytosis for recurrence in those patients were 70.8 and 83.3%, respectively (AUROC, 0.847; P=0.01). Therefore, a PLT count of 400×109/l is a suitable threshold for defining thrombocytosis in GC. Thrombocytosis was shown to affect the blood hypercoagulable state and also have a negative prognostic value for GC patients. PLT monitoring following surgery was useful to predict the recurrence for specific GC patients that suffered preoperative thrombocytosis but had restored PLT levels following resection.

Keywords: gastric cancer, thrombocytosis, recurrence, survival analysis

Introduction

Thrombocytosis can be induced by a number of primary and secondary factors. Primary thrombocytosis is a type of myeloproliferative disease with 50–70% of patients exhibiting mutations in the JAK2V617F gene and PLT levels >600×109/l and even up to 1,000×109/l (1). Secondary thrombocytosis is caused by drugs or other diseases, including inflammation, infection, rheumatism, anemia and malignancy, where patients exhibit moderately increased PLT levels that are between 400 and 800×109/l (24). After excluding the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia, preoperative cancer patients with a PLT count of >400×109/l are considered to have secondary thrombocytosis (57). However, the threshold remains controversial.

Since the 1980s, the phenomenon that a comorbidity between blood hypercoaguable state and malignant solid tumors has caused widespread concerned and been increasingly studied. Although the specific mechanism is not completely understood, the association between thrombocythemia and the hypercoagulability state has been confirmed repeatedly (8). Prior to the evidence that malignant tumors lead to coagulation abnormality, Riess firstly proposed the symptoms of unexplained thrombocytosis in malignancies (9). Previously, thrombocytosis, as a paraneoplastic syndrome, has been successively identified in oral squamous cell, renal cell and hepatocellular carcinomas, as well as lung, esophageal, gastric (GC), colorectal, pancreatic and gynecological cancers (2,1012).

Numerous studies agree that malignancies with unknown causes of thrombocytosis may be a valuable adjuvant parameter in predicting the prognosis of cancer (2,4,5,11). However, the complex effect of thrombocytosis in malignancy has been rarely reported. GC is the second most common malignancy in China, however, there are few specific early clinical manifestations and accurate predictors of prognosis. Therefore, GC patients with a high risk of recurrence may benefit from a reliable predicting indictor. In the present study, associations between thrombocytosis and clinicopathological features, survival time and tumor recurrence were systematically investigated in GC patients. The aim was to provide a new approach in the diagnosis and prognosis of GC.

Methods and methods

Definition of the blood test indicator

Primary thrombocytosis was eliminated using bone marrow cytomorphological examinations, and thrombocytosis was diagnosed as a PLT count >400×109/l, which was in accordance with other studies (5,7,13). As the normal PLT count of patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College (Wenzhou, China) ranges between 100 and 300×109/l, individuals with a PLT count >300×109/l were also analyzed. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), D-dimer, fibrinogen, prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) standards were as follows: 0–5 μg/l; 0–37 U/ml; 0–0.5 mg/l; 2–4 g/l; 11–13 sec; and 30–45 sec, respectively. Sodium citrate anticoagulated blood samples were collected and analyzed with a COULTER Gen-S automatic blood analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, FL, USA) and Stago STA-R Evolution automatic coagulometer (Diagnostica Stago, Inc., Beijing, China).

Patients

A total of 1,763 patients who underwent surgical treatment for GC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between July 2005 and June 2008 were eligible for retrospective review in the study. None of the patients had received radiation therapy or chemotherapy prior to surgery, but had received strict chemical therapy following surgery, according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network GC guidelines. Histopathological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma was confirmed by the Pathology Department following surgery, according to the World Health Organization’s criteria. In total, 71 patients with GC and thrombocytosis were enrolled in study cohort A. These patients had a mean age of 63±9.15 years (range, 27–84 years). A total of 213 patients with a PLT count >300×109/l were included in study cohort B and these individuals had a mean age of 63±10.02 years (range, 27–84 years). Control group A comprised 107 patients with benign gastric lesions that had a mean age of 41±6.33 years (range, 23–66 years). Control group B comprised 100 cases that had been randomly selected from 1,550 GC individuals with normal PLT counts. The mean age was 66±8.46 years (range, 34–88 years).

Blood samples were collected from the individuals within 1 week prior to surgery, ~4 weeks following surgery and during the follow-up period. B-mode ultrasound and physical examinations were performed postoperatively for patients with major complaints to assess the status of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Imageological examinations, including computed tomography (CT) and enhanced CT scans, were performed to assess recurrence during the follow-up period. Informed written consent was provided by each patient and the study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University.

Statistical analysis

Associations between thrombocytosis and clinicopathological features were analyzed using the χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test, independent sample t-test, Pearson’s correlation test and logistic regression analysis. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the clinical significance of thrombocytosis in GC. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the Z-test were applied to analyze the sensitivities and specificities of PLTs in predicting recurrence. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Thrombocytosis in GC patients

As shown in Table I, when compared with control group A (benign gastric lesion, 0%, 0/107), the morbidity [4.03%, 71/1,763; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.11–4.94] of GC patients with thrombocytosis (PLT >400×109/l) increased significantly (P=0.014). This was also observed in patients with a PLT count >300×109/l (12.08%, 213/1,763; 95% CI, 10.56–13.60; P<0.001).

Table I.

Thrombocytosis in patients with gastric carcinomas or benign gastric lesions.

PLT >300×109/l PLT >400×109/l


Group PLT ≤300×109/l, n n P-value n P-value
Gastric carcinoma 1,550 213 <0.001 71 0.014a
Benign gastric lesions 106 1 0
a

Calculated with Fisher’s exact test.

PLT, platelet. P-value compared the incidence of thrombocythemia with PLT count ≤300×109/l in different groups.

Correlation between thrombocytosis and clinicopathological features

As shown in Table II, the incidence of thrombocytosis, defined as a PLT count >400×109/l, exhibited statistically significant differences when compared with the normal PLT cohort in tumor size (P<0.001), tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) classification (particularly for phase I, P=0.002) and depth of penetration (P=0.003). No statistically significant differences were identified in age, tumor location, type, degree of differentiation, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymphatic invasion, distant metastasis or tumor markers CEA/CA19-9 (P>0.05). The same result was verified in patients with a PLT count >300×109/l with regard to tumor size (P=0.001), TNM classification (P<0.001) and penetration (P<0.001). Analysis of enumeration data revealed that no statistical significance existed between thrombocythemia and clinicopathological features in the cancer group (data not shown). In addition, to exclude the interaction between tumor size, type, differentiation, lymphatic invasion, penetration and TNM classification, risk assessments were used to measure the effect of these independent variables on thrombocytosis. Tumor size [P=0.002; odds ratio (OR), 2.179; 95% CI, 1.347–3.526], TNM classification (P<0.001; OR, 1.763; 95% CI, 1.317–2.360) and depth of penetration (P=0.001; OR, 1.643; 95% CI, 1.232–2.191) functioned as moderate positive factors for the occurrence of thrombocythemia.

Table II.

Thrombocytosis and clinicopathological variables in GC.

PLT >300×109/l PLT >400×109/l


Variable PLT ≤300×109/l, n n P-value n P-value
Age, years
 <60 39 75 0.516 24 0.488
 ≥60 61 138 47
Location
 Upper third 20 31 0.082 10 0.339
 Middle third 36 105 33
 Lower third 44 77 28
Tumor size, cm
 <5 58 79 0.001 21 <0.001
 ≥5 42 134 50
Type
 Adenocarcinoma 98 198 0.191a 67 0.263a
 Squamous carcinoma 0 3 1
 Undifferentiated 2 12 3
Degree of differentiation
 Well 15 19 0.242 10 0.886
 Moderate 17 38 10
 Poor 66 156 48
Vascular invasion
 Present 34 67 0.653 29 0.422
 Absent 66 146 42
Perineural invasion
 Present 37 80 0.924 26 0.959
 Absent 63 133 45
Lymphatic invasion
 Present 71 174 0.172 57 0.168
 Absent 29 49 14
TNM classification
 I 21 12 <0.001 1 0.002a
 II 21 49 16
 III 44 105 39
 IV 14 47 15
Depth of penetration
 T1 18 10 <0.001 1 0.003a
 T2 4 15 5
 T3 53 97 37
 T4 25 91 28
Distant metastasis
 Present 86 166 0.093 56 0.221
 Absent 14 47 15
CEA
 Abnormal 23 43 0.570 22 0.305
 Normal 77 170 49
CA19-9
 Abnormal 25 55 0.877 19 0.795
 Normal 75 158 52
a

Calculated with Fisher’s exact test.

PLT, platelet; GC, gastric cancer; TNM, tumor, nodes, metastasis; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9. P-value compared the incidence of thrombocythemia with PLT count ≤300×109/l in different groups.

The mean pretreatment PLT count for thrombocytosis patients was 469.23±53.99×109/l (range, 402–605×109/l), the leukocyte count was 8.54±2.61×109/l (range, 3.7–17.3×109/l) and the hemoglobin concentration was 83.51±26.68 g/l (range, 47–160 g/l). The mean PLT count for GC patients that had preoperative PLT levels >300×109/l in study group B was 379.92±73.23×109/l (range, 302–605×109/l), while the leukocyte count was 7.81±3.95×109/l (range, 2.9–20.6×109/l) and the hemoglobin concentration was 92.61±27.14 g/l (range, 44–167 g/l). A significant positive linear correlation was identified between the PLT and leukocyte counts when the PLT count was >300 or 400×109/l (r=0.3291; P<0.001; and r=0.3232; P=0.006, respectively; Fig. 1A and B). However, a correlation between the PLT count and hemoglobin concentration was only verified in patients with a PLT count >300×109/l (r=−0.1856; P=0.006; Fig. 1C), since P=0.599 for patients with a PLT count >400×109/l (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Linear correlation analysis. Correlations between leukocyte counts and (A) >300×109/l (P<0.001) and (B) >400×109/l (P=0.006) PLT counts. Correlation between hemoglobin concentration and (C) >300×109/l (P=0.006) and (D) >400×109/l (P=0.599) PLT counts. PLT, platelet.

Correlation between thrombocytosis and the blood hypercoagulable state

Although ultrasonic examinations did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the control group and study cohorts with PLT count >300×109/l or 400×109/l (P=0.444 and 0.083, respectively), DVT was more likely to affect tumor patients with thrombocytosis (7.04%, 5/71) than patients with a PLT count >300×109/l (3.29%, 7/213). Abnormal D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations occurred more frequently in patients with thrombocytosis (PLT>400×109/l; P=0.004 and 0.013, respectively), but no statistically significant differences were observed when the threshold was defined as 300×109/l. In addition, no correlation was observed between the occurrence of anomalous PLT counts and decreased PT/APTT (Table III). As aforementioned, the enumeration data of thrombocytosis demonstrated that no statistical significance was present between the cancer groups with regard to blood hypercoagulability (data not shown).

Table III.

Thrombocytosis and coagulation markers in GC.

PLT >300×109/l PLT >400×109/l


Variable PLT ≤300×109/l, n n P-value n P-value
PT
 Decreased 8 28 0.158 12 0.071
 Normal 90 175 57
APPT
 Decreased 11 30 0.465 13 0.204
 Normal 83 172 56
Fibrinogen
 Normal 83 158 0.061 51 0.042
 Increased 15 52 20
D-dimer
 Normal 87 172 0.172 51 0.013
 Increased 13 41 20
DVT
 Present 1 7 0.444a 5 0.083a
 Absent 99 206 66
a

Calculated with Fisher’s exact test.

GC, gastric cancer; PLT, platelet; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, prothrombin time. P-value compared the incidence of thrombocythemia with PLT count ≤300×109/l in different groups.

Survival analysis in GC patients with thrombocytosis

The overall 5-year survival rate of tumor patients with thrombocytosis (PLT >400×109/l) was 16.90%, while the survival rate was 31.00% in individuals with a normal PLT count. Median survival times were 15 and 24 months, respectively (P=0.008, as determined by the logrank test; Fig. 2A). However, when compared with control group B, individuals with a PLT count >300×109/l exhibited no significant difference in prognosis (P=0.227). The results demonstrated that ~42.25% (30/71) of patients did not have thrombocytosis following resection, however, the reason was unknown. Due to preoperative PLT counts being maintained at a high level in the most advanced-stage patients who were unable to undergo D2 dissection, the postoperative PLT count was also useful for predicting prognosis (P=0.046; Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Survival analysis between GC patients with PLT counts that were (A) normal, >300×109/l (P=0.227) and >400×109/l (P=0.008) and (B) decreased to a normal level and remained >400×109/l (P=0.417). PLT, platelet; GC, gastric cancer.

Prior to multivariate analysis, association analysis between thrombocytosis and clinicopathological features allowed the exclusion of age, location, type, vascular invasion and perineural invasion. Thus, PLT counts, TNM classification, depth of penetration, tumor size, degree of differentiation and lymphatic invasion were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Of the six factors, PLT count, TNM classification and lymphatic invasion were identified as independent prognostic indicators of survival (Table IV). Individuals with thrombocytosis had a relative risk (RR) for mortality of 1.538 (95% CI, 1.041–2.271; P=0.031), 1.994 for TNM classification (95% CI, 1.432–2.777; P<0.001) and 3.975 for lymphatic invasion (95%CI, 1.565–9.203; P=0.003).

Table IV.

Multivariate analysis of the prognostic indicators.

Factors RR 95% CI P-value
PLT, ×109/l
 ≤300 1.000
 >400 1.538 1.041–2.271 0.031
TNM classification
 I 1.000
 II 1.692 0.544–5.267 0.364
 III 3.339 0.941–11.852 0.062
 IV 6.875 1.824–25.914 0.004
Depth of penetration
 T1 1.000
 T2 0.664 0.225–1.954 0.457
 T3 0.856 0.447–1.641 0.640
 T4 0.927 0.473–1.816 0.825
Lymphatic invasion
 Absent 1.000
 Present 3.795 1.565–9.203 0.003
Tumor size, cm
 <5 1.000
 ≥5 0.826 0.555–1.228 0.344
Degree of differentiation
 Well 1.000
 Moderate 1.685 0.808–3.517 0.164
 Poor 1.239 0.656–2.344 0.509

P-values were calculated using the Enter method. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; TNM, tumor, nodes, metastasis; PLT, platelet.

Thrombocytosis monitoring for the recurrence of GC

To evaluate the role of thrombocytosis (PLT >400×109/l) in cancer recurrence, differences were compared between tumor patients with a normal PLT count and a group of individuals whose PLT count decreased from >400×109/l to normal following surgery. Sensitivities for predicting the recurrence of malignancy in patients with normal and decreased PLT counts were 24.1 and 70.8%, respectively. In addition, the specificities of the two groups were 88.2 and 83.3%, respectively. Therefore, thrombocytosis in cancer patients with a decreased postoperative PLT count had a significant advantage for predicting tumor recurrence with AUROC, as compared with patients that had a normal PLT count prior to surgery (0.847 vs. 0.550; P=0.004; Table V).

Table V.

Comparison of tumor recurrence among PLT levels.

Sensitivities and specificities for recurrence

Group PLT, ×109/l Imaging n Sensitivity, % Specificity, % AUROC P-value
Normal PLT (n=100) >400 + 20
2
≤400 + 63 0.5500
15 24.1 88.2 95% CI, 408-0.691 0.521
Declined PLT (n=30) >400 + 17
1
≤400 + 7 0.847a
5 70.8 83.3 95% CI, 0.707-0.988 0.010
a

Declined PLT group had a significantly better AUROC value as compared with the normal PLT group (P=0.004).

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; PLT, platelet; CI, confidence interval. Imaging refers to computed tomography scans, +, recurrence is verified.

Discussion

As a multifunctional factor, an abnormal surplus of PLTs is associated with tumor size, TNM classification, invasive degree, prognosis and tumor recurrence in GC, as well as D-dimer and fibrinogen blood concentrations. The association between DVT and thrombocytosis remains to be clarified as ultrasonic testing was only performed on suspected patients that exhibited major complaints. In addition, the decrease in the number of PLTs temporarily following surgery may have been due to the surgical patients suffering blood loss during the procedure. Furthermore, clinical infusion during the fasting period contributed to hemodilution.

Malignant tumors with secondary thrombocythemia have been increasingly studied. Without a uniform standard, thrombocytosis has been defined as a PLT count >400×109/l in the majority of studies (57). However, 220, 300, 350 and 500×109/l have also been used as the threshold in previous studies (5,1416). The confusion in the definition of thrombocytosis has caused deviation in experimental results and the reduction of lateral comparability between studies. As demonstrated in the present study, no statistically significant differences were identified between the two cancer groups with PLT counts of >300×109/l and >400×109/l with regard to the linear correlation between the PLT and leukocyte counts or the associated clinicopathological features. The difference in the linear correlation between hemoglobin concentrations and PLT levels was omitted due to the slight correlation. Survival analysis also illustrated the advantage of using PLT >400×109/l as the standard for predicting prognosis. Clinically, there are a number of situations that can cause secondary thrombocytosis in patients with malignant solid tumors, including infection, anemia, inflammation and necrosis. Therefore, it is a reasonable hypothesis to define thrombocytosis in GC patients as those with a PLT count >400×109/l. This excludes clinical confounding without causing a statistical deviation.

Although speculation remains, several hypotheses have been proposed with regard to the mechanisms by which thrombocytosis develops in malignancies. Released by the liver, kidney and skeletal muscle, thrombopoietin (TPO) specifically stimulates the proliferation and maturation of megakaryocytes, as well as the release of PLTs. In specific cases of tumor-associated thrombocytosis, the concentration of plasmatic TPO significantly increased due to complex pathophysiological factors (17). In addition, activation of the TPO receptor and the feedback regulation of TPO mRNA in the bone marrow participate in this phenomenon (18). However, TPO is not the only factor, as the body is able to produce a few PLTs following TPO gene knockout and the elimination of the TPO receptor (19). Interleukin-1 and -6 are bone marrow-stimulating cytokines that are associated with thrombocytosis and may potentially facilitate the production of PLTs (20,21). As previous studies have shown, the morbidity of thrombocytosis in various malignancies is inhomogeneous. It was found that ~42.5% of ovarian epithelial cancer cases presented with concurrent thrombocytosis, as well as 56.8% of renal cell carcinoma cases (2, 22). These results are much higher compared with other tumors, where the occurrence of thrombocytosis was 4.0% in GC patients and 4.5% in non-small-cell lung cancer patients (23). With regard to histoembryology classification, hematopoietic cells and the urogenital system originate from the same mesoderm, while the digestive and respiratory system originate from the same endoderm. Thus, we hypothesized that compared with the digestive system, the biological function of malignant tumors derived from the urogenital system may be more inclined to thrombocytosis.

Thrombocytosis may adversely affect survival in malignancies by promoting neoplasm invasion, adhesion and proliferation. Tumor cell-induced PLT aggregation may activate and aggregate PLTs to mediate adhesion to cancer cells via glycoproteins-Ib-IX, IIb/IIIa or adenosine diphosphate (24). PLTs efficiently shield and protect malignant cells from the host’s immune system and provide a useful medium for the adhesion of cancer cells to the vascular endothelium through forming tumor thrombi and adhesion molecules, including P-selectin and von Willebrand factor (25,26). Following adhesion, PLTs also play a role in tumor growth by secreting several tumor growth and angiogenic factors, including PLT-derived growth factor, arachidonic acid and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF highly correlates with PLTs as an angiogenic factor and was shown to adversely affect survival in GC (27,28). Neovascularization is necessary for the development of neoplasm, which also explains the association between thrombocytosis and TNM classification, depth of penetration, tumor size and prognosis. However, predicting cancer recurrence with PLTs has been rarely reported. Although the mechanism is unclear, the clinical data indicate the significance of monitoring PLTs in a specific population; patients who suffered thrombocytosis preoperatively, but recovered following surgery.

In conclusion, a PLT count of 400×109/l is an ideal threshold value for the definition of thrombocytosis. Although the incidence (4.0%) was lower than other types of cancer, thrombocytosis was shown to be associated with a number of clinicopathological features and function as an independent prognostic indicator and cancer recurrence monitor.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by grants from the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. Y2100660) and the Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau (no. H20100028).

References

  • 1.Delhommeau F, Jeziorowska D, Marzac C, Casadevall N. Molecular aspects of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Int J Hematol. 2010;91:165–173. doi: 10.1007/s12185-010-0530-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gungor T, Kanat-Pektas M, Sucak A, Mollamahmutoglu L. The role of thrombocytosis in prognostic evaluation of epithelial ovarian tumors. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:53–56. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0673-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang Z, Jiang C, Zhang YM, Yao B. Analysis of hemogram, iron staining in bone marrow and iron metabolism in 98 patients with thrombocytosis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science. 2008;26:49–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tchebiner JZ, Nutman A, Boursi B, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of thrombocytosis in admitted medical patients. Am J Med Sci. 2011;342:395–401. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318214768d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Iwasaki A, Hamanaka W, Harnada T, Maekawa S, Enatsu S, Shirakusa T. Significance of platelet counts in patients who underwent surgical treatment for lung metastasis. Int Surg. 2007;92:103–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ikeda M, Furukawa H, Imamura H, et al. Poor prognosis associated with thrombocytosis in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:287–291. doi: 10.1007/BF02573067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maráz A, Furák J, Varga Z, Kahán Z, Tiszlavicz L, Hideghéty K. Thrombocytosis has a negative prognostic value in lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:1725–1729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gouin-Thibault I, Achkar A, Samama MM. The thrombophilic state in cancer patients. Acta Haematol. 2001;106:33–42. doi: 10.1159/000046587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Riess L. Pathology of the blood. Arch Anat Physiol Wissensch Med. 1872;39:237–249. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ferrigno D, Buccheri G. Hematologic counts and clinical correlates in 1201 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2003;59:193–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Qiu MZ, Xu RH, Ruan DY, et al. Incidence of anemia, leukocytosis, and thrombocytosis in patients with solid tumors in China. Tumour Biol. 2010;31:633–641. doi: 10.1007/s13277-010-0079-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aminian A, Karimian F, Mirsharifi R, et al. Significance of platelet count in esophageal carcinomas. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:134–137. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.77245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aoe K, Hiraki A, Ueoka H, et al. Thrombocytosis as a useful prognostic indicator in patients with lung cancer. Respiration. 2004;71:170–173. doi: 10.1159/000076679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brockmann MA, Giese A, Mueller K, et al. Preoperative thrombocytosis predicts poor survival in patients with glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2007;9:335–342. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nather A, Mayerhofer K, Grimm C, et al. Thrombocytosis and anaemia in women with recurrent ovarian cancer prior to a second-line chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:2991–2994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zwitter M, Kovac V, Smrdel U, Kocijancic I, Segedin B, Vrankar M. Phase I-II trial of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2005;16:1129–1134. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200511000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cerutti A, Custodi P, Duranti M, Noris P, Balduini CL. Thrombopoietin levels in patients with primary and reactive thrombocytosis. Br J Haematol. 1997;99:281–284. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.3823196.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Soonthornthum T, Suraseraneewong V, Kengsakol K, Wijaithum K, Kasemsan P, Prommatt S. Thrombocytosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90:1495–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Sauvage FJ, Carver-Moore K, Luoh SM, et al. Physiological regulation of early and late stages of megakaryocytopoiesis by thrombopoietin. J Exp Med. 1996;183:651–656. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.2.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lidor YJ, Xu FJ, Martínez-Maza O, et al. Constitutive production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-6 by human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993;207:332–339. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ceresa IF, Noris P, Ambaglio C, Pecci A, Balduini CL. Thrombopoietin is not uniquely responsible for thrombocytosis in inflammatory disorders. Platelets. 2007;18:579–582. doi: 10.1080/09537100701593601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Symbas NP, Townsend MF, El-Galley R, Keane TE, Graham SD, Petros JA. Poor prognosis associated with thrombocytosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2000;86:203–207. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tomita M, Shimizu T, Ayabe T, Onitsuka T. Prognostic significance of the combined use of preoperative platelet count and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in non-small-cell lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:573–576. doi: 10.1007/s11748-010-0647-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lian L, Li W, Li ZY, et al. Inhibition of MCF-7 breast cancer cell-induced platelet aggregation using a combination of antiplatelet drugs. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:675–680. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Palumbo JS, Talmage KE, Massari JV, et al. Platelets and fibrin(ogen) increase metastatic potential by impeding natural killer cell-mediated elimination of tumor cells. Blood. 2005;105:178–185. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McCarty OJ, Mousa SA, Bray PF, Konstantopoulos K. Immobilized platelets support human colon carcinoma cell tethering, rolling, and firm adhesion under dynamic flow conditions. Blood. 2000;96:1789–1797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bachelot T, Ray-Coquard I, Menetrier-Caux C, Rastkha M, Duc A, Blay JY. Prognostic value of serum levels of interleukin 6 and of serum and plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in hormone-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1721–1726. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang X, Chen X, Fang J, Yang C. Overexpression of both VEGF-A and VEGF-C in gastric cancer correlates with prognosis, and silencing of both is effective to inhibit cancer growth. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:586–597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES