Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Nov 21;92(24):11269–11273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.24.11269

The challenge of paleoecological stasis: reassessing sources of evolutionary stability.

P J Morris 1, L C Ivany 1, K M Schopf 1, C E Brett 1
PMCID: PMC40613  PMID: 11607592

Abstract

The paleontological record of the lower and middle Paleozoic Appalachian foreland basin demonstrates an unprecedented level of ecological and morphological stability on geological time scales. Some 70-80% of fossil morphospecies within assemblages persist in similar relative abundances in coordinated packages lasting as long as 7 million years despite evidence for environmental change and biotic disturbances. These intervals of stability are separated by much shorter periods of ecological and evolutionary change. This pattern appears widespread in the fossil record. Existing concepts of the evolutionary process are unable to explain this uniquely paleontological observation of faunawide coordinated stasis. A principle of evolutionary stability that arises from the ecosystem is explored here. We propose that hierarchical ecosystem theory, when extended to geological time scales, can explain long-term paleoecological stability as the result of ecosystem organization in response to high-frequency disturbance. The accompanying stability of fossil morphologies results from "ecological locking," in which selection is seen as a high-rate response of populations that is hierarchically constrained by lower-rate ecological processes. When disturbance exceeds the capacity of the system, ecological crashes remove these higher-level constraints, and evolution is free to proceed at high rates of directional selection during the organization of a new stable ecological hierarchy.

Full text

PDF
11269

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buzas M. A., Culver S. J. Species pool and dynamics of marine paleocommunities. Science. 1994 Jun 3;264(5164):1439–1441. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5164.1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilmore A. P., Jackson P., Waites G. T., Critchley D. R. Further characterisation of the talin-binding site in the cytoskeletal protein vinculin. J Cell Sci. 1992 Nov;103(Pt 3):719–731. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.3.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gingerich P. D. Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling. Science. 1983 Oct 14;222(4620):159–161. doi: 10.1126/science.222.4620.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jackson J. B. Community unity? Science. 1994 Jun 3;264(5164):1412–1413. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5164.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackson J. B., Jung P., Coates A. G., Collins L. S. Diversity and extinction of tropical american mollusks and emergence of the isthmus of panama. Science. 1993 Jun 11;260(5114):1624–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5114.1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheldon P. R. Parallel gradualistic evolution of Ordovician trilobites. Nature. 1987 Dec 10;330(6148):561–563. doi: 10.1038/330561a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES