Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry logoLink to Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
. 2013 Jul 28;29(3):362–366. doi: 10.1007/s12291-013-0366-4

Study of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Risk Components in Patients Attending Tertiary Care Center of Uttarakhand

Rajeev Goyal 1,2,, Ashok Kumar 3, Monil Singhai 4,5
PMCID: PMC4062672  PMID: 24966487

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome is a complex of metabolic factors which includes central obesity, insulin-resistance, dyslipidemia and hypertension. Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to know the rate of metabolic syndrome in outpatients presenting to medicine department of our hospital and their profile. The metabolic syndrome was diagnosed using International Diabetes Federation criteria. The parameters analyzed included age, sex, blood pressure, BMI, fasting plasma glucose, HDL and triglycerides. The rate of metabolic syndrome was 21.1 % in our study. The younger population was most susceptible to metabolic derangements. Further, females were found to be affected more than males. The extremely significant parameters were deranged fasting plasma glucose, HDL, triglycerides while hypertension was found to be insignificant. Being overweight maybe a strong predictor for presence of metabolic syndrome in our region of study, and all overweight persons should be assessed and appropriately treated to prevent future cardiovascular events.

Keywords: Metabolic syndrome, Parameters, Profile, Factor analysis

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a complex of metabolic factors that are associated with increase in risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and fatty liver [1, 2]. Early detection of MS may lead to prevention of these conditions [3]. The components of MS include central obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia [decreased high density lipid (HDL) and increased triglycerides] and hypertension. Individuals with MS, depending on the number of components present, have a 30–40 % probability of developing diabetes and/or CVD within 20 years [1].

International Diabetes Federation (IDF) has given a new definition for diagnosis of MS in which central obesity, with incorporation of ethnic variations, has been given primary importance (Table 1). Prevalence of the MS in Asian Indians varies according to region, extent of urbanization, lifestyle patterns, and socioeconomic/cultural factors [4]. The reported prevalence of MS varies from 20 to 30 % in different regions of Indian [5, 6]. There are very few reports on component analysis of MS and their impact in semi-urban populations of Uttarakhand, which is a hill state of India. This study aimed to analyze the profile and evaluate components of MS in patients visiting tertiary care center of Kumaon region of Uttarakhand. The study also aimed to find out difference, if any, between components of MS in MS positive and MS negative population in a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand.

Table 1.

IDF criteria for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome

Central obesity BMI >30 kg/m2
Plus any two of the following
 Raised triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality
 Reduced HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dl in males, <50 mg/dl in females or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality
 Raised blood pressure Systolic BP ≥130 or diastolic BP ≥85 mmHg or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension
 Raised fasting plasma glucose FPG ≥100 mg/dl or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Materials and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study, including outpatients presenting to medicine department of Government Medical College and Sushila Tiwari Hospital, Haldwani, Uttarakhand. All patients aged <18 years or who had history of Cushing syndrome, Hypothyroidism, Secondary hypertension, Type 1 diabetes, Hepatobiliary disease, Nephrotic syndrome or pregnancy were excluded. The study was approved by institutional ethics committee. The IDF criteria for diagnosis of MS was used (Table 1). After recording history (age, gender, medical history), blood pressure (BP) was measured in sitting position. An average of three readings was taken. Height was measured with a non-stretchable wall mounted measuring tape and weight was recorded with a weighing machine. Body mass index (BMI), was calculated [weight (kg)/height (m)2]. BMI of 18.5–24.9 were considered to be of optimal weight while BMI 25–29.9 was overweight and BMI >30 was obese [7]. Fasting blood samples were taken for estimation of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HDL and triglycerides. Glucose was estimated by hexokinase method (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim), while HDL and triglycerides were done by enzymatic colorimetric assays (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim). All analysis were performed on Roche Cobas c501 fully automated analyzer and two levels of quality control material (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim) were used.

Statistical Test

Chi square test was used to find out difference between components of MS in MS positive and MS negative population. p < 0.05 was considered significant p < 0.001 very significant and p < 0.0001 extremely significant.

Results

A total of 400 patients were initially enrolled in the study, however 20 were later excluded due to incomplete data and 380 were included. Participants were diagnosed as having metabolic syndrome as per IDF criteria and their general characteristics are mentioned in Table 2. 35.5 % participants (135/380) were found to be overweight while 21.1 % were obese (80/380). FPG was elevated in 44.7 % (170/380) of study participants. 22 % (85/380) participants were diabetic. Similarly, triglycerides (TG) were increased in 44.7 % (170/380) of participants while 65.8 % (250/380) had elevated BP. Surprisingly, a very large proportion (80.3 %) of participants (305/380) had reduced HDL.

Table 2.

General characteristics of study participants

Characteristic Value
Age 48.25 ± 12.39 years
Sex
 Male 240 (63.2)
 Female 140 (30.8)
Weight 69.16 ± 14.92 kg
BMI 26.59 ± 5.77 kg/m2
Triglycerides 151.45 ± 70.36 mg/dl
HDL 38.47 ± 5.27 mg/dl
FPG 103.86 ± 34.52 mg/dl
Blood pressure
 Systolic 137.49 ± 23.61 mmHg
 Diastolic 87.3 ± 12.88 mmHg

The rate of MS was 21.1 % (n = 80). The profiling of patients with and without MS is shown in Table 3. The prevalence of MS in female (n = 140) and male participants (n = 240) was 39.2 and 10.4 % respectively; and difference was found extremely significant (p = 0.0001). On age-wise analysis, the maximum prevalence of MS was seen in age group 20–40 years (n = 105) followed by groups >60 years (n = 65) and 41–60 years (n = 210) (28.6 %, 23.1 % and 16.7 % respectively) with statistically significant difference (p = 0.046).

Table 3.

Profile of patients with and without MS

Factors MS positive MS negative p value
Age (years)
 20–40 30 75 0.046
 41–60 35 175
 >61 15 50
Sex
 Males 25 215 0.0001
 Females 55 85
BMI (m2/kg)
 >30 80 0
 >25 0 135
 >23 0 165
FPG (mg/dl)
 >100 60 110 0.0001
 <100 20 190
HDL (mg/dl)
 Decreased 50 255 0.0001
 Normal 30 45
Triglycerides (mg/dl)
 >150 60 110 0.0001
 <150 20 190
Hypertension
 Present 60 190 0.051
 Absent 20 110

The percentage of participants with elevated TG was 75 % (60/80) and 36.7 % (110/300) amongst participants with and without MS (p = 0.0001). 75 % (60/80) of participants with MS and 36.7 % (110/300) of participants without MS had elevated FPG and the difference was extremely significant (p = 0.0001). 75 % (60/80) of participants with MS had elevated BP while 63.33 % (190/300) of MS negative participants had elevated BP although the difference was not significant (p = 0.051). 62.5 % (50/80) MS participants had reduced HDL levels while it was 85 % (255/300) for participants without MS (p = 0.0001).

The number of parameters deranged in participants with and without MS are shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Number of parameters deranged in participants with and without MS

Number of parameters (BMI, FPG, BP, HDL, TG) MS present (n = 80) MS absent (n = 300)
One (n = 41) 0 % (0) 13.7 % (41)
Two (n = 53) 0 % (0) 17.7 % (53)
Three (n = 104) 31.3 % (25) 26.3 % (79)
Four (n = 67) 50 % (40) 9.0 % (27)
Five (n = 15) 18.8 % (15) 0 % (0)

Discussion

Asian Indians are a high risk population with regards to cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and the number of those at-risk is increasing consistently [1]. Therefore this study was designed to assess the prevalence of MS and analyze the significance of various components of MS in patients visiting our medicine OPD. To the best of our knowledge this is first study on metabolic syndrome in Uttarakhand, which is a hilly state of India.

The results of the present study show that prevalence of MS was 21.1 %, which is similar to prevalence in other regions of India and Asia as shown by different studies [6, 8, 9]. Prevalence of MS has been reported 19.52 % in Maharashtra, 31.6 % in Rajasthan and 41 % in Tamil Nadu [6, 10, 11]. As different studies have used dissimilar criteria for diagnosis of MS, the comparison may be unsubstantial. This perhaps reinforces the requirement of an internationally acceptable and relevant definition. The rates of MS in our study population were higher in females compared to males. This gender difference is in concordance with other studies [6, 9, 10, 12] and is important to be clearly identified as certain conditions specific to females, such as pregnancy, menopause, polycystic ovarian syndrome, etc. may aggravate cardiovascular risk in association with MS [13].

A higher number of younger participants were found to be having MS, which is surprising, as traditionally, all metabolic parameters associated with MS are known to derange with increasing age [1417]. This variation may probably be due to changing lifestyle of younger generation over the past decades, with increasing preference for junk food and reduced physical activity [18]. Moreover rigourous lifestyle behaviour of hilly people also have been shifted to moderate one in this millennium due to economic liberalization and market reforms in our state. Gupta et al. [19] have also shown that cardiovascular risk factors are escalating at a younger age group in Asian Indians. It has also been shown that DM and MS are associated with increased oxidative stress and inflammation therefore therapeutic life style along with antioxidant intake may be beneficial [2022].

In this study, 36.8 % participants were overweight while 21.1 % were obese. The data from Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) for Uttarakhand in 2008 showed that the prevalence of overweight and central obesity was 14 and 18 % respectively [23]. The prevalence of obesity ranged from 6 to 30 % in different parts of our country [2426]. The National family Health Survey 3 (2005–2006) found that 9 and 13 % of males and females respectively were overweight/obese [27]. Thus the overweight and obesity patterns in Uttarakhand are slightly higher than countrywide trends. Although BMI as a marker of obesity was used in this study, it is established that BMI is not a good indicator of total adipose tissue concentration as well as fat distribution; the cut off for BMI >30 for obesity is controversial [28, 29]. Also, Asian populations have been shown to have a greater predisposition for atherosclerosis and diabetes at a lower level of BMI [30, 31]. Though some studies have used BMI >23 as cut off value, this is not yet accepted universally and a WHO expert consultation group has recommended that WHO cut offs for BMI (>30 kg/m2) should be retained as such [32]. Better indicators, such as waist hip ratio can be used to for better assessment of population with MS but were not used in this study due to resource constraints.

The difference of TG levels in participants with and without MS was extremely significant inflicting it as an important contributor in MS. NHANES study further established higher TG levels is a significant parameter in MS [33].

We found that 31 % of diabetic patients were having MS. An earlier study had found that 62 % of newly diagnosed T2DM patients were having MS according to IDF criteria [34] and it has also been suggested that family history of T2DM can be useful predictor for diagnosis of MS [35]. It is known that impaired fasting glucose is a risk factor for diabetes and both are known to be associated closely with obesity, though the mechanism behind this is not confirmed yet [36].

Though a large number of MS participants had elevated BP, the difference was not significant. Prevalence of history of hypertension was not found significant in a study on metabolic syndrome in urban India reinforcing our findings [6].

Further, there was extremely significant difference in HDL levels of participants with or without MS, although overall HDL levels in our study population were found to be low. It has been reported earlier that only 4 % Asian men and 5 % Asian women had normal HDL levels. Similarly, studies conducted on a large group of Indian participants had low HDL levels [37, 38]. Epidemiological studies are needed to assess the baseline levels of HDL in healthy population, as population of this region may be having significant variations in HDL level from reference values.

To have further insight when we assessed number of parameters deranged in each participants we came across a dilemma. A large number of participants (35.3 %) had 3 or more parameters deranged, but were not classified as having MS because their BMI was <30, which is an essential criterion for diagnosis of MS according to IDF definition. It has been shown earlier that the prevalence of MS is lowest using IDF criteria [34]. Thus, it is important to note that as cut-off values for various parameters have been abridged in IDF criteria, the number of persons diagnosed as MS has reduced considerably.

Conclusions

Thus we conclude that in our study population, the prevalence of MS is 21.1 %, and females are affected more than males. Further, younger population is more susceptible to these metabolic derangements. Elevated TG and Reduced HDL are most significant indicator of MS. Being overweight is a strong predictor for presence of metabolic syndrome in our region of study, and all overweight persons should be assessed and appropriately treated to prevent future cardiovascular events. We also suggest a need to monitor those having >3 parameters deranged for future development of CVD.

References

  • 1.Enas EA, Mohan V, Deepa M, Farooq S, Pazhoor S, Chennikkara H. The metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia among Asian Indians: a population with high rates of diabetes and premature coronary artery disease. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2007;2:267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-4564.2007.07392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mishra S, Yadav D, Gupta M, Mishra H, Sharma P. Hyperinsulinemia predisposes to NAFLD. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2008;23(2):130–135. doi: 10.1007/s12291-008-0030-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharma P, Mishra S. Editorial: metabolic syndrome: early identification may prevent type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2007;22(1):1–3. doi: 10.1007/BF02912872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Misra A, Khurana L. The metabolic syndrome in South Asians: epidemiology, determinants, and prevention. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7:497–514. doi: 10.1089/met.2009.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gupta R, Deedwania PC, Gupta A, Rastogi S, Panwar RB, Kothari K. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an Indian urban population. Int J Cardiol. 2004;97:257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sawant A, Mankeshwar R, Shah S, Raghavan R, Dhongde G, Raje H, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in urban India. Cholesterol. 2011;2011:920983. doi: 10.1155/2011/920983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO expert committee. Technical Report Series No. 854. 1995. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/physical_status/en/. Accessed 1 May 2013. [PubMed]
  • 8.Katulanda P, Ranasinghe P, Jayawardana R, Sheriff R, Matthews DR. Metabolic syndrome among Sri Lankan adults: prevalence, patterns and correlates. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2012;4:24. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-4-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Manopriya TSK, Dhastagir S. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a local population in India. Biochemia Medica. 2010;20:249–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gupta R, Deedwania PC, Gupta A, Rastogi S, Panwar RB, Kothari K. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an Indian urban population. Int J Cardiol. 2004;97(2):257–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Satyavani K, Sivasankari S, Vijay V. Metabolic syndrome in urban Asian Indian adults—a population study using modified ATP III criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2003;60(3):199–204. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(03)00060-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kamble P, Deshmukh PR, Garg N. Metabolic syndrome in adult population of rural Wardha, central India. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132:701–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chatzi L, Plana E, Daraki V, Karakosta P, Alegkakis D, Tsatsanis C, et al. Metabolic syndrome in early pregnancy and risk of preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:829–836. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iozzo P, Beck-Nielsen H, Laakso M, Smith U, Yki-Jarvinen H, Ferrannini E. Independent influence of age on basal insulin secretion in nondiabetic humans. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:863–868. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.3.5542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Greenfield MS, Kraemer F, Tobey T, Reaven G. Effect of age on plasma triglyceride concentrations in man. Metabolism. 1980;29:1095–1099. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(80)90221-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilson PW, Anderson KM, Harris T, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Determinants of change in total cholesterol and HDL-C with age: the Framingham Study. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M252–M257. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.6.M252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ferrara A, Barrett-Connor E, Shan J. Total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol decrease with age in older men and women. The Rancho Bernardo Study 1984–1994. Circulation. 1997;96:37–43. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.96.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jha BK. 20% of school-going children in India overweight due to junk food: CSE. The Times of India. 2012. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-10-16/india/34497720_1_junk-food-trans-fats-food-or-fast-food. Accessed 1 May 2013.
  • 19.Gupta R, Misra A, Vikram NK, Kondal D, Gupta SS, Agrawal A, et al. Younger age of escalation of cardiovascular risk factors in Asian Indian subjects. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sharma P, Mishra S, Ajmera P, Mathur S. Oxidative stress in metabolic syndrome. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2005;20(1):150–154. doi: 10.1007/BF02893062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goyal R, Singhai M, Faizy AF. Glutathione peroxidase activity in obese and nonobese diabetic patients and role of hyperglycemia in oxidative stress. J Midlife Health. 2011;2:72–76. doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.92529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goyal R, Faizy AF, Siddiqui SS, Singhai M. Evaluation of TNF-α and IL-6 levels in obese and non-obese diabetics: pre- and postinsulin effects. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4:180–184. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.94944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP), Non-communicable disease risk factors survey. 2007–08. http://nhsrcindia.org/pdf_files/resources_thematic/.../338.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2013.
  • 24.Mohan B, Kumar N, Aslam N, Rangbulla A, Kumbkarni S, Sood NK, et al. Prevalence of sustained hypertension and obesity in urban and rural school going children in Ludhiana. Indian Heart J. 2004;56:310–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Unnikrishnan AG, Kalra S, Garg MK. Preventing obesity in India: weighing the options. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:4–6. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.91174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zargar AH, Masoodi SR, Laway BA, Khan AK, Wani AI, Bashir MI, et al. Prevalence of obesity in adults—an epidemiological study from Kashmir Valley of Indian Subcontinent. J Assoc Physicians India. 2000;48:1170–1174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arnold F, Parasuraman S, Arokiasamy P, Kothari M. Nutrition in India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005–06. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADQ632.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2013.
  • 28.Shah NR, Braverman ER. Measuring adiposity in patients: the utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Green DJ. Is body mass index really the best measure of obesity in individuals? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:526. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hu FB. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1249–1257. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gupta M, Brister S. Is South Asian ethnicity an independent cardiovascular risk factor? Can J Cardiol. 2006;22:193–197. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70895-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.WHO, Expert Consultation Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–163. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2444–49. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Dhanaraj E, Bhansali A, Jaggi S, Dutta P, Jain S, Tiwari P, et al. Predictors of metabolic syndrome in Asian north Indians with newly detected type 2 diabetes. Indian J Med Res. 2009;129(5):506–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Das M, Pal S, Ghosh A. Family history of type 2 diabetes and prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adult Asian Indians. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012;3:104–108. doi: 10.4103/0975-3583.95362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grundy SM. Pre-diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular risk. JACC. 2012;59:635–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Enas EA, Yusuf S, Mehta JL. Prevalence of coronary artery disease in Asian Indians. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70(9):945–949. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90744-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sawant AM, Shetty D, Mankeshwar R, Ashavaid TF. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in young adult Indian population. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:99–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES