Abstract
Secondary osteosarcoma from fibrous dysplasia (FD) is very rare. The etiology of FD is linked to activating missense mutations of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein α-subunit (GNAS) gene, which encodes the stimulatory α subunit of the G protein (Gsα) and is located at chromosome 20q13. These mutations are central to the pathogenesis of FD; however, it is not known whether Gsα mutations are retained following malignant transformation in FD. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been performed on chromosomal analysis of secondary osteosarcoma from FD. The present study presents a case of secondary osteosarcoma arising from polyostotic FD in a 72-year-old male. Chromosomal analysis showed 44, X, -Y, add(4)(p11), add(5)(p15), der(11)add(11)(p15)t(1;11)(q21;q23), add(12)(q11), -13, der(22)t(12;22)(q11;p12). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis demonstrated the presence of a Gsα mutation in both the primary tumor cells and secondary osteosarcoma cells. There was no alteration in this mutation in the region of malignant transformation, which suggests that this mutation may be a useful clinical marker for distinguishing de novo osteosarcoma (primary osteosarcoma) from secondary osteosarcoma arising from FD.
Keywords: malignant transformation, fibrous dysplasia, secondary osteosarcoma, mutation
Introduction
Malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia (FD) is rare (1–4). It can occur in monostotic and polyostotic FD, with a frequency of <1% among all FD (2). The most common type of malignant tumor arising from FD is osteosarcoma (~70%), followed by fibrosarcoma (~20%), and chondrosarcoma (~10%), with malignant fibrous histiocytoma (~4%) occurring less commonly (2).
Activating missense mutations in the guanine nucleotide-binding protein α-subunit (GNAS) gene, which encodes the stimulatory α subunit of the G-protein (Gsα), resulting in a change at the Arg 201 codon from arginine to cysteine (Arg-to-Cys, R201C) or arginine to histidine (Arg-to-His, R201H) have been identified in both the monostotic and polyostotic forms of FD, as well as in McCune-Albright syndrome (5–7). These mutations are central to the pathogenesis of FD; however, it remains unknown whether the Gsα mutations are retained following malignant transformation of FD. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been performed on chromosomal alterations that occur in FD with malignant transformation. The present study reveals the chromosomal analysis, as well as the status of the Gsα mutations, of a patient with an osteosarcoma arising in polyostotic FD. Patient provided written informed consent.
Case report
Case summary
A 72-year-old male presented to the Ojiya General Hospital (Ojiya, Japan) with right knee pain of 3 months in duration, with no history of previous trauma. This patient had a history of colon cancer that had been resected 2 years prior to presentation. There was no recurrence or metastasis. Initial workup roentgenograms, which were performed at the Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital (Nagaoka, Japan) showed a ground glass appearance and a well-defined lucency with sclerotic margins in the right femur and tibia. Although these features are consistent with polyostotic FD, an ill-defined osteolytic lesion, 4×3 cm in size, was superimposed on the changes of FD in the inferior part of the femur (Fig. 1A). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the extraosseous extent of the tumor from the lesion in the distal part of the femur (Fig. 1B). The lesion was intensively enhanced by injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Fig. 1C), which is suggestive of malignant transformation of FD. The patient did not show cutaneous pigmentation, endocrine disturbances, or soft tissue lesions, as can be seen in McCune-Albright and Mazabraud’s syndromes. No other members of the family had a history of bone tumor. Blood chemistry data showed that the alkaline phosphatase and C-reactive protein levels were elevated to 960 IU/l (normal level, 120–325 IU/l) and 7.39 mg/dl (normal level, <0.3 mg/dl), respectively. Other values, including those of serum calcium (9.4 mg/dl; normal level, 8.7–11.0 mg/dl), phosphorus (4.2 mg/dl; normal level, 2.6–4.4mg/dl), aspartate aminotransferase (24 U/l; normal level, 12–34 U/l), alanine aminotransferase (12 U/l; normal level, 7–36 U/l) and total bilirubin (0.7 mg/dl; normal level, 0.2–1.2 mg/dl), were within acceptable limits. Open biopsy revealed an osteosarcoma with an adjacent area of FD. The patient was referred to the Niigata Cancer Center Hospital (Niigata, Japan) for further treatment of this lesion. Since a pathological fracture through the lesion of the distal femur (see Fig. 1D) had become evident after admission to our hospital, the patient underwent thigh amputation.
Pathological analysis
Gross specimen analysis showed that in the distal femur, the tumor had destroyed part of the cortex and had extended to the surrounding soft tissue. Microscopic examination of this area showed highly pleomorphic, spindle-shaped tumor cells, producing various forms of osteoid (Fig. 2A). The tumor was densely cellular with a high mitotic rate, including atypical figures. The histological features of this area confirmed the diagnosis of osteosarcoma. The adjacent intramedullary part of the tumor in the femur and the tibia showed a solid yellow-white appearance. Microscopic examination of these lesions showed features consistent with FD; small trabeculae of woven bone of various sizes and shapes, scattered within a fibrous tissue without evidence of osteoblastic activity (Fig. 2B). Thus, the case was diagnosed as secondary osteosarcoma arising in pre-existing FD.
Chromosomal analysis and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Chromosomal analysis by G-banded karyotyping showed 44,X,-Y, add(4)(p11), add(5)(p15), der(11)add(11)(p15)t(1;11)(q21;q23),add(12)(q11), -13, der(22)t(12;22)(q11;p12) in nine out of 10 metaphases from the osteosarcoma lesion. RT-PCR analysis for Gsα mutations, which was performed as previously described (8), demonstrated the presence of a Gsα mutation at the Arg 201 codon in both the primary tumor cells and secondary osteosarcoma cells (Fig. 3).
Follow-up
In terms of systemic treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy was not administrated to the patient due to advanced age. At 4 years of clinical follow-up, the patient was well without local recurrence or metastatic disease.
Discussion
FD is a common benign fibro-osseous lesion; it occurs in 5–7% of all benign bone tumors (9,10). The etiology of FD is linked to activating missense mutations in the GNAS gene, which encodes Gsα and is located at 20q13 (5). Gsα mutations have been found in tumors from both the monostotic and polyostotic form of FD, as well as in the McCune-Albright syndrome, a disorder that combines polyostotic FD, skin pigmentation and one or several endocrinopathies (9,10). Among fibro-osseous lesions of bone, Gsα mutations are specific to FD (6–8).
Malignant transformation of FD is very rare (1–4). Thus, the status of Gsα mutations in osteosarcoma arising from FD has not been reported in the English literature. In the current case, the same Gsα mutation was detected in both the region of FD and the region of malignant transformation. In addition, chromosomal analysis of the osteosarcoma cells did not show any alterations in chromosome 20, which harbors the GNAS gene. From the current study, it is not clear whether the Gsα mutation itself was directly responsible for the pathogenesis of the malignant transformation of FD. However, the fact that the Gsα mutation did not change through the process of malignant transformation leads us to believe that this mutation has the potential to at least be a clinical marker for distinguishing de novo osteosarcoma (primary osteosarcoma) from secondary osteosarcoma arising from FD.
Tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma may involve a complex interplay of chromosomal alternations, with loss of tumor suppressor genes, altered expression of oncogenes and increased levels of certain growth factors (11–13). Although no characteristic chromosome translocations have been identified in osteosarcomas, several chromosomal regions appear to be altered non-randomly (14,15). Bridge et al examined 111 chromosomally abnormal osteosarcoma specimens and found that chromosomal regions 1p11–13, 1q10–12, 1q21–22, 11p15, 12p13, 17p12–13, 19q13 and 22q11–13 were most frequently rearranged, and that the most common numerical abnormalities were +1, −9, −10, −13, and −17 (14). Among these, the most thoroughly investigated deletion hotspots are those at 13q14 and 17p13, which correspond with the RB1 and TP53 tumor suppressor genes, respectively. Mutations in TP53 have been shown to result in impaired DNA repair mechanisms and disrupted antiangiogenesis activity (12,15). The RB1 gene is critical to cell-cycle control, and inherited mutations in the RB1 gene cause retinoblastoma syndrome, a condition that predisposes a patient to multiple malignancies (12,15). Mutations or dysfunction in both the TP53 and RB1 genes have also been shown to be involved in osteosarcoma pathogenesis (11,12,15).
Of the abovementioned common chromosomal alterations, loss of chromosome 13 and rearranged chromosomal regions 1q21–22 and 11p15 were found in the current case. The loss of chromosome 13 in this case would have resulted in the inactivation of RB1, which correlated with the malignant transformation of FD. Although the definitive roles of the other chromosomal alterations involved are not known, given the fact that the majority of common chromosomal abnormalities in primary osteosarcoma were also found in secondary osteosarcoma, it seems reasonable to assume that these chromosomal abnormalities also play important roles in tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma.
In summary, the present study reports the presence of a Gsα mutation and chromosomal alterations in secondary osteosarcoma arising from polyostotic FD. Further investigation is required to elucidate the mechanism and impact of these alterations in the malignant transformation of FD.
References
- 1.Yabut SM, Jr, Kenan S, Sissons HA, Lewis MM. Malignant transformation of fibrous dysplasia. A case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(228):281–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ruggieri P, Sim FH, Bond JR, Unni KK. Malignancies in fibrous dysplasia. Cancer. 1994;73:1411–1424. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940301)73:5<1411::aid-cncr2820730516>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoshi M, Matsumoto S, Manabe J, Tanizawa T, Shigemitsu T, Izawa N, Takeuchi K, Kawaguchi N. Malignant change secondary to fibrous dysplasia. Int J Clin Oncol. 2006;11:229–235. doi: 10.1007/s10147-006-0559-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doganavsargil B, Argin M, Kececi B, Sezak M, Sanli UA, Oztop F. Secondary osteosarcoma arising in fibrous dysplasia, case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:439–444. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0669-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Riminucci M, Robey PG, Saggio I, Bianco P. Skeletal progenitors and the GNAS gene: fibrous dysplasia of bone read through stem cells. J Mol Endocrinol. 2010;45:355–364. doi: 10.1677/JME-10-0097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liang Q, Wei M, Hodge L, Fanburg-Smith JC, Nelson A, Miettinen M, Foss RD, Wang G. Quantitative analysis of activating alpha subunit of the G protein (Gsα) mutation by pyrosequencing in fibrous dysplasia and other bone lesions. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13:137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tabareau-Delalande F, Collin C, Gomez-Brouchet A, Decouvelaere AV, Bouvier C, Larousserie F, Marie B, Delfour C, Aubert S, Rosset P, de Muret A, Pagès JC, de Pinieux G. Diagnostic value of investigating GNAS mutations in fibro-osseous lesions: a retrospective study of 91 cases of fibrous dysplasia and 40 other fibro-osseous lesions. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:911–921. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gu W, Ogose A, Matsuba A, Kawashima H, Hotta T, Kudo N, Hoshino M, Kondo N, Mera H, Endo N. Activating Gs a mutation rarely occurs in musculoskeletal tumors other than fibrous dysplasia. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(2B):1611–1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DiCaprio MR, Enneking WF. Fibrous dysplasia. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1848–1864. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siegal GP, Bianco P, Dal Cin P. Fibrous dysplasia. In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th edition. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2013. pp. 352–353. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gorlick R, Khanna C. Osteosarcoma. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:683–691. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Broadhead ML, Clark JC, Myers DE, Dass CR, Choong PF. The molecular pathogenesis of osteosarcoma: a review. Sarcoma 2011. 2011;2011:959248. doi: 10.1155/2011/959248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosenberg AE, Cleton-Jansen A-M, de Pinieux G, Deyup AT, Hauben E, Squire J. Conventional osteosarcoma. In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th edition. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2013. pp. 282–288. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bridge JA, Nelson M, McComb E, McGuire MH, Rosenthal H, Vergara G, Maale GE, Spanier S, Neff JR. Cytogenetic findings in 73 osteosarcoma specimens and a review of the literature. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997;95:74–87. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(96)00306-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martin JW, Squire JA, Zielenska M. The genetics of osteosarcoma. Sarcoma. 2012;2012:627254. doi: 10.1155/2012/627254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]