Abstract
Muscle LIM protein (MLP) is a member of the cysteine rich protein family and has so far been regarded as a muscle-specific protein that is mainly involved in myogenesis and the organization of cytoskeletal structure in myocytes, respectively. The current study demonstrates for the first time that MLP expression is not restricted to muscle tissue, but is also found in the rat naive central nervous system. Using quantitative PCR, Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses we detected MLP in the postnatal rat retina, specifically in the somas and dendritic arbors of cholinergic amacrine cells (AC) of the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer (displaced AC). Induction of MLP expression started at embryonic day 20 and peaked between postnatal days 7 and 14. It subsequently decreased again to non-detectable protein levels after postnatal day 28. MLP was identified in the cytoplasm and dendrites but not in the nucleus of AC. Thus, retinal MLP expression correlates with the morphologic and functional development of cholinergic AC, suggesting a potential role of this protein in postnatal maturation and making MLP a suitable marker for these neurons.
Introduction
The family of cysteine rich proteins (CRP) comprises three closely related members, CRP1, CRP2, and CRP3. CRP3 is also known as muscle LIM protein (MLP) and has been postulated as a muscle-specific protein (mainly expressed in the heart). It is involved in the myogenesis and cytoskeletal organization of myocytes [1]–[5]. Accordingly, MLP deficiency leads to myocardial hypertrophy followed by cardiomyopathy and heart failure [6], [7]. In myocytes, MLP is localized in the cytoplasm, where it is involved in cytoskeleton modulation [4]. In addition, MLP has been reported to translocate to the nucleus to modulate gene expression during myogenesis and as part of a biomechanical stress response [8], [9]. A functional role of MLP in other tissues such as the central nervous system, such as the retina has not yet been described.
Amacrine cells (AC) are a heterogeneous group of retinal interneurons and synaptically interact with bipolar cells, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and other AC. Mammalian AC have been classified into more than 26 morphologic subtypes [10], [11] that are distinguishable by specific molecular markers, morphology, size and their neurotransmitters [12]. Cholinergic AC produce the neurotransmitter acetylcholine [13] allowing their specific identification by antibodies against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) [14]. In rodents, ChAT-immunoreactive AC are detected from embryonic day 17 and produce acetylcholine lifelong [15]. AC are either conventionally located in the inner nuclear layer (INL) at the border with the inner plexiform layer (IPL) or displaced to the ganglion cell layer (GCL) [13], [16], [17]. The cells of the displaced subpopulation are stimulated by light and therefore termed ON-cells. Their dendrites are restricted to the ON sublamina of the IPL, whereas the AC located in the INL are excited in the absence of light (OFF cells). These AC accumulate their dendrites in the OFF-sublamina. As a consequence of this strict stratification pattern, two distinct ChAT-immunoreactive dendritic layers of cholinergic AC are visible in the IPL [18]. Moreover, cholinergic AC induce spontaneous waves of action potentials in the developing retina, which reportedly facilitates the formation of visual circuits between retinal neurons. This process is apparently driven by the release of acetylcholine [19], [20].
In mammals, the morphology of cholinergic AC proceeds development until the animals open their eyes between postnatal days 13–15 [15], [21]. Concurrently, AC form synapses with direction-selective RGCs during the first two postnatal weeks to establish functional circuits [22]. Islet1, NeuroD or Math3 are reportedly among the few so far identified factors that promote genesis and differentiation of AC [23], [24], while cell adhesion and guidance molecules such as semaphorins participate in the specific laminar stratification of AC [25], [26].
The current study reports that MLP is expressed in the cytoplasm of cholinergic AC during the late embryonic and the postnatal maturation stage, thereby demonstrating that MLP is also markedly expressed in other tissue than muscle and that MLP is a specific marker for postnatal cholinergic AC with a potential role in AC maturation.
Materials and Methods
All experimental animal procedures were approved by the local animal care committee in Recklinghausen and conducted in compliance with federal and state guidelines for animal experiments in Germany (Permit Number: 84-02.04.2012.A300). Rats were maintained on a 12 hour light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Rats were killed either by inhalation of CO2 or intraperitoneal application of ketamine (60–80 mg/kg; Pfizer) and xylazine (10–15 mg/kg; Bayer) and perfused through the heart with cold PBS (Gibco) followed by paraformaldehyde (Sigma) (4% PFA in PBS).
RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from retinae of rats using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Retina-derived RNA (10 ng) of 4 different animals per age group was combined and reversely transcribed using the superscript II kit (Invitrogen). The cDNA quantification of MLP and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression was performed with the SYBR Gree PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and QuantiTect primers (Rn_Csrp3_1_SG, Rn_Gapdh_1_SG QuantiTect Primer Assay (200); Qiagen) using the Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems 7500). Retina-derived cDNA was amplified during 45 cycles according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All reactions were performed in duplicate and as two independent runs. Quantitative analysis was performed using Applied Biosystems 7500 software, calculating the expression of MLP relative to the endogenous housekeeping gene GAPDH. Relative quantification was calculated using comparative threshold cycle method (ΔΔCt). The specificity of the PCR products from each run was determined and verified with the dissociation curve analysis feature of the Applied Biosystems 7500 software. The significance in pairwise comparisons between age groups was evaluated using Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test.
Western Blot
For retinal lysate preparation, rat retinae were dissected and collected in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl (Sigma), pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl (AppliChem), 250 mM sucrose (Sigma), 10 mM NaF (Sigma), 1 mM DTT (Sigma), 0.1 mM Na3VO4 (Sigma), 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma), 0.1% SDS (Sigma)) with protease inhibitors (Calbiochem). Retinae were homogenized by sonification and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants obtained from 4 different animals per group were combined and used for western blot analysis. Separation of proteins was performed by 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, according to standard protocols (Bio-Rad). Afterwards, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad). The blots were blocked in 5% dried milk with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline-Tween-20 and processed for immunostaining with either a polyclonal antibody against MLP (C9001-23; United States Biological; 1∶500) or a monoclonal antibody against β-actin (AC-15; Sigma; 1∶5000). Bound anti-MLP-antibody was visualized with anti-goat immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, 1∶30 000) and the antigen–antibody complexes were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Bio-Rad). Bound anti-actin-antibody was visualized with anti-mouse infrared dye secondary antibody (IRDey 800 CW; LI-COR; 1∶20 000) using Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR).
Immunohistochemistry and Quantification of MLP-positive AC
Rats were anesthetized and perfused through the heart with cold PBS followed by paraformaldehyde (4% PFA in PBS). Eyes were enucleated, post-fixed for several hours in 4% PFA, transferred to 30% sucrose overnight (4°C), and embedded in Tissue-Tek (Sakura). Frozen sections were cut longitudinally on a cryostat, thaw-mounted onto coated glass slides (Superfrost plus, Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and stored at −20°C until further use. A polyclonal antibody against ChAT (AB144P; Merck Millipore; 1∶100) and a monoclonal antibody against MLP (a kind gift from Dr. Geier, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; 1∶400) were used. Anti-goat IgG and anti-mouse IgG antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 594, respectively, were used as secondary antibodies (Invitrogen; 1∶1000). Stained sections were embedded with Mowiol (Calbiochem), covered using glass coverslips (VWR) and analyzed under a fluorescent microscope (Axiovision, Zeiss). For quantification of MLP-positive cholinergic AC, an intensity threshold was set to identify the positively stained cells. The percentage of MLP-expressing cholinergic AC was calculated as the ratio of MLP-positive to ChAT-positive cell numbers. Three animals per postnatal age and four sections per animal were quantified. Confocal images of fluorescent sections were obtained using confocal laser scanning microscope LSM 510 (Zeiss).
For retinal whole mount staining, rats were killed by decapitation and the retinae were rapidly dissected from the eyecups. Retinae were attached to nitrocellulose filter, fixed in 4% PFA for 30 min and treated with 2% TritonX (Sigma) for 1 h. The whole mounts were stained with antibodies against ChAT (1∶100) and MLP (1∶400), embedded with Mowiol and covered using glass coverslips. Confocal images were obtained using confocal laser scanning microscope LSM 510 (Zeiss).
Dissociated AC Culture
Tissue culture plates (four-well-plates; Nunc) were coated with poly-D-lysine (0.1 mg/ml, molecular weight 300 000 Da; Sigma), rinsed with distilled water and air-dried. To prepare AC cultures, postnatal rats were killed by decapitation, retinae were rapidly dissected from the eyecups and incubated at 37°C for 30 min in a digestion solution containing papain (10 U/ml; Worthington) and L-cysteine (0.3 mg/ml; Sigma) in Neurobasal (NB) medium (Gibco). They were then rinsed with NB medium and triturated in 1 ml NB medium. Dissociated cells were passed through a cell strainer (40 mm) and 300 µl cell suspension in NB medium containing B27 supplement (1:50; Gibco), penicillin/streptomycin (0.2 mg/ml; Biochrom) and L-Glutamine (0.5 mM; Sigma) were added to each well. Cells remained in culture for 2 hours or 2 days and were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution in PBS for 25 min and then in 100% methanol (Sigma) for 10 min. AC were stained with antibodies against ChAT (1∶100) and MLP (1∶400).
Results
MLP Expression in Embryonic and Postnatal Rat Retina
Initial experiments revealed MLP expression in postnatal rat retinae. To assess the complete temporal pattern of MLP expression during retinal development, we examined embryonic, postnatal and adult rat retinae (E18-P42) using quantitative real-time PCR and western blot analysis. Real-time PCR revealed low expression levels of MLP in E18 and adult retinae (Fig. 1. A). Expression increased slightly in E20 retinae and was significantly elevated at P0 to P14, with peak expression at P14 (∼7 fold). Thereafter, MLP expression rapidly decreased, falling to levels comparable to embryonic stages. (Fig. 1 A).
To verify the mRNA expression data at the protein level, we also performed western blot analysis on retinal lysates from P0–P42 rats. Sparse MLP protein was detectable at P0 (Fig. 1. B), but MLP levels increased between P3 and P14. In accordance with the results of the real-time PCR analysis, MLP expression peaked at P14 and markedly decreased at P21. No MLP protein was detected in retinal lysates at P28, P35 or P42.
MLP is Expressed in Cholinergic Amacrine Cells
We next investigated the cellular localization of MLP in embryonic and postnatal retinae. Immunohistochemical staining of retinal cross-sections identified MLP-positive cells in the GCL and the INL of P14 retinae (Fig. 2 A). Co-immunostaining with an antibody against ChAT, a specific marker for cholinergic AC, revealed rigorous co-localization of ChAT and MLP staining, demonstrating that MLP expression is restricted to cholinergic AC only (Fig. 2 A, Fig. 3 B). MLP staining was detected on postnatal AC somas and dendrites whereas the nucleus remained spared (Fig. 3 A, Fig. 3 B). In addition, both sublaminae of the IPL containing dendrites of cholinergic AC from the GCL and the INL, respectively, were prominently immunoreactive for MLP.
We next analyzed the time course of MLP expression and quantified MLP-positive cholinergic AC in late embryonic and postnatal retinae. Slight MLP expression co-localizing with ChAT-positive cells was first detected at E20 (Fig. 2 A). The intensity of MLP immunoreactivity and number of MLP-positive cells substantially increased at P0 close to a still barely developed IPL. At P7 and P14, all cholinergic AC expressed MLP protein (Fig. 2 A, Fig. 2 B) and two subpopulations of MLP-positive cells located either in the GCL or the INL were clearly distinguishable. MLP staining markedly decreased in both subpopulations of cholinergic AC at P28 (Fig. 2A, Fig. 2 B). This reduction was slightly more pronounced in the INL compared to the GCL. On average, 45% of ChAT-immunoreactive cells of the GCL and 26% in the INL were still faintly MLP-positive at P28. Consistent with the Western-blot results, MLP remained weakly expressed in only very few cholinergic AC at P42 and P49 (Fig. 2A, Fig. 2 B).
MLP is Expressed in Cultured Cholinergic AC
We tested whether MLP-Expression can also be observed in cultured postnatal cholinergic AC. To this end cultures of cholinergic AC were prepared from retinae of rats at P1. MLP-expression was observed in small sprouting dendrites of cholinergic ACs after 2 hours in culture (Fig. 4). After 2 days MLP levels markedly increased in the somas and in the dendrites (Fig. 4). The dendrites, however, were not immunoreactive for ChAT. These data indicate that MLP is a suitable marker for outgrowing dendrites of cultured postnatal cholinergic AC.
Discussion
MLP is a well-characterized protein, mainly expressed in heart tissue. It is involved in myogenesis and the organization of cytoskeletal structures in myocytes and has so far been regarded as muscle-specific [1], [4], [8]. The current study demonstrates to our knowledge for the first time that this protein is also markedly expressed in postnatal CNS tissue and therefore not restricted to muscle tissue. Western-blot analysis and quantitative PCR revealed a transient retinal MLP expression starting at E20, reaching a peak between P7 and P14 and absence in the adult retina. Immunohistochemical analysis confined MLP expression in cholinergic (ChAT-positive) AC. These neurons are one of at least 26 distinguishable AC subtypes with the ability to produce the neurotransmitter acetylcholine and are involved in the maturation of postnatal retina [19], [20] as well as motion sensation by the visual apparatus [27], [28].
In rodents, first AC are born at E8/E9, along with retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), horizontal cells and cone photoreceptors. AC genesis peaks at E16/E17, but proceeds at least until P5/P7 [29], [30]. Consistent with the data presented in the current study, cholinergic AC start to express choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) at around E18 and therefore almost simultaneously to the observed induction of retinal MLP-expression [15]. However, in contrast to the lifelong expression of ChAT, MLP is only expressed throughout the first 3 weeks after birth and absent in adult AC. During this postnatal time period AC form dendrites (E18), establish two well-separated cholinergic dendritic layers in the IPL (P3) [15] and make synapses on RGCs and bipolar cells (P3–P15) [31]. This process also timely overlaps with the emergence of spontaneous acetylcholine dependent waves of excitatory activity between P0 and P11 [32], which are important for the formation of synapses and the establishment of neural circuits between retinal neurons. The formation of specific synapses between cholinergic AC and direction-selective RGCs, known to be crucial for motion sensing, occurs in the second postnatal week and is therefore timely correlated with morphologic maturation of AC [22]. Maturation of cholinergic AC is eventually accomplished at postnatal day 15, the time of eye opening [15], [21] and of detected decrease of MLP expression, suggesting a potential functional involvement of this protein in this context. Future studies still have to investigate the potential role of MLP during AC development. To this end the morphology of AC or other retinal cells as well as the visual function of MLP deficient and wild-type mice could be compared with each other to identify potential differences.
In muscle tissue MLP is crucially involved in myogenesis and myocyte differentiation, requiring the localization of MLP in the nucleus, where it serves as transcriptional cofactor and modulates the expression of myocyte specific genes [8]. In addition, MLP is also located in the cytoplasm where it might promote the assembly of cytoskeletal proteins along actin-based filaments [4]. As MLP was only detected in the cytoplasm of AC it appears more likely that it is rather involved in the organization of cytoskeleton than regulation of gene expression in these neurons. In this context MLP may support the growth and stratification of dendrites or synapse formation. MLP has been shown to interact with a broad variety of proteins belonging to different functional classes in muscle tissue [33], [34]. In particular, interactions of MLP with α-actin [35], actin-binding proteins like cofilin 2 [2], spectrins (βI-spectrin) [5] or even metabolic enzymes like D-lactate dehydrogenase [36] were described. Therefore, the role of MLP in cholinergic AC might depend on the interaction with several partners. Further research is required to address these possibilities. Nevertheless, MLP expression can now be used as a novel marker for postnatal cholinergic AC.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Christian Geier, Charite Berlin for providing anti-MLP antibody. We thank Marcel Kohlhaas, University of Düsseldorf for technical support and Dr. Heike Diekmann for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Arber S, Halder G, Caroni P (1994) Muscle LIM protein, a novel essential regulator of myogenesis, promotes myogenic differentiation. Cell 79: 221–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Papalouka V, Arvanitis DA, Vafiadaki E, Mavroidis M, Papadodima SA, et al. (2009) Muscle LIM protein interacts with cofilin 2 and regulates F-actin dynamics in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Mol Cell Biol 29: 6046–6058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang X, Li Q, Adhikari N, Hall JL (2006) A role for muscle LIM protein (MLP) in vascular remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol 40: 503–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arber S, Caroni P (1996) Specificity of single LIM motifs in targeting and LIM/LIM interactions in situ. Genes Dev 10: 289–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Flick MJ, Konieczny SF (2000) The muscle regulatory and structural protein MLP is a cytoskeletal binding partner of betaI-spectrin. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 9): 1553–1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Arber S, Hunter JJ, Ross J Jr, Hongo M, Sansig G, et al. (1997) MLP-deficient mice exhibit a disruption of cardiac cytoarchitectural organization, dilated cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. Cell 88: 393–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Geier C, Gehmlich K, Ehler E, Hassfeld S, Perrot A, et al. (2008) Beyond the sarcomere: CSRP3 mutations cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mol Genet 17: 2753–2765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kong Y, Flick MJ, Kudla AJ, Konieczny SF (1997) Muscle LIM protein promotes myogenesis by enhancing the activity of MyoD. Mol Cell Biol 17: 4750–4760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Boateng SY, Belin RJ, Geenen DL, Margulies KB, Martin JL, et al. (2007) Cardiac dysfunction and heart failure are associated with abnormalities in the subcellular distribution and amounts of oligomeric muscle LIM protein. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H259–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. MacNeil MA, Heussy JK, Dacheux RF, Raviola E, Masland RH (1999) The shapes and numbers of amacrine cells: matching of photofilled with Golgi-stained cells in the rabbit retina and comparison with other mammalian species. J Comp Neurol 413: 305–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. MacNeil MA, Masland RH (1998) Extreme diversity among amacrine cells: implications for function. Neuron 20: 971–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Haverkamp S, Wassle H (2000) Immunocytochemical analysis of the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 424: 1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Voigt T (1986) Cholinergic amacrine cells in the rat retina. J Comp Neurol 248: 19–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eckenstein F, Thoenen H (1982) Production of specific antisera and monoclonal antibodies to choline acetyltransferase: characterization and use for identification of cholinergic neurons. Embo J 1: 363–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kim IB, Lee EJ, Kim MK, Park DK, Chun MH (2000) Choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive neurons in the developing rat retina. J Comp Neurol 427: 604–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hayden SA, Mills JW, Masland RM (1980) Acetylcholine synthesis by displaced amacrine cells. Science 210: 435–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Vaney DI, Peichi L, Boycott BB (1981) Matching populations of amacrine cells in the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers of the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol 199: 373–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Famiglietti EV Jr (1983) ‘Starburst’ amacrine cells and cholinergic neurons: mirror-symmetric on and off amacrine cells of rabbit retina. Brain Res 261: 138–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Feller MB, Wellis DP, Stellwagen D, Werblin FS, Shatz CJ (1996) Requirement for cholinergic synaptic transmission in the propagation of spontaneous retinal waves. Science 272: 1182–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ford KJ, Feller MB (2012) Assembly and disassembly of a retinal cholinergic network. Vis Neurosci 29: 61–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang J, Yang Z, Wu SM (2005) Development of cholinergic amacrine cells is visual activity-dependent in the postnatal mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 484: 331–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wei W, Hamby AM, Zhou K, Feller MB (2011) Development of asymmetric inhibition underlying direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 469: 402–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Elshatory Y, Everhart D, Deng M, Xie X, Barlow RB, et al. (2007) Islet-1 controls the differentiation of retinal bipolar and cholinergic amacrine cells. J Neurosci 27: 12707–12720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Inoue T, Hojo M, Bessho Y, Tano Y, Lee JE, et al. (2002) Math3 and NeuroD regulate amacrine cell fate specification in the retina. Development 129: 831–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yamagata M, Weiner JA, Sanes JR (2002) Sidekicks: synaptic adhesion molecules that promote lamina-specific connectivity in the retina. Cell 110: 649–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Matsuoka RL, Nguyen-Ba-Charvet KT, Parray A, Badea TC, Chedotal A, et al. (2011) Transmembrane semaphorin signalling controls laminar stratification in the mammalian retina. Nature 470: 259–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Famiglietti EV (1987) Starburst amacrine cells in cat retina are associated with bistratified, presumed directionally selective, ganglion cells. Brain Res 413: 404–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Taylor WR, Smith RG (2012) The role of starburst amacrine cells in visual signal processing. Vis Neurosci 29: 73–81 doi:10.1017/S0952523811000393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rapaport DH, Wong LL, Wood ED, Yasumura D, LaVail MM (2004) Timing and topography of cell genesis in the rat retina. J Comp Neurol 474: 304–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Voinescu PE, Kay JN, Sanes JR (2009) Birthdays of retinal amacrine cell subtypes are systematically related to their molecular identity and soma position. J Comp Neurol 517: 737–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Fisher LJ (1979) Development of synaptic arrays in the inner plexiform layer of neonatal mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 187: 359–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bansal A, Singer JH, Hwang BJ, Xu W, Beaudet A, et al. (2000) Mice lacking specific nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits exhibit dramatically altered spontaneous activity patterns and reveal a limited role for retinal waves in forming ON and OFF circuits in the inner retina. J Neurosci 20: 7672–7681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gehmlich K, Geier C, Milting H, Furst D, Ehler E (2008) Back to square one: what do we know about the functions of muscle LIM protein in the heart? J Muscle Res Cell Motil 29: 155–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Buyandelger B, Ng KE, Miocic S, Piotrowska I, Gunkel S, et al. (2011) MLP (muscle LIM protein) as a stress sensor in the heart. Pflugers Arch 462: 135–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Louis HA, Pino JD, Schmeichel KL, Pomies P, Beckerle MC (1997) Comparison of three members of the cysteine-rich protein family reveals functional conservation and divergent patterns of gene expression. J Biol Chem 272: 27484–27491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Flick MJ, Konieczny SF (2002) Identification of putative mammalian D-lactate dehydrogenase enzymes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 295: 910–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]