Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jun 19;9(6):e100534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100534

Survivin Delta Ex3 Overexpression in Thyroid Malignancies

Joanna Waligórska-Stachura 1, Mirosław Andrusiewicz 2, Nadia Sawicka-Gutaj 1, Maciej Biczysko 3, Anna Jankowska 2, Marta Kubiczak 2, Agata Czarnywojtek 1, Elżbieta Wrotkowska 1, Marek Ruchała 1,*
Editor: Anthony WI Lo4
PMCID: PMC4063961  PMID: 24945990

Abstract

Context

Thyroid cancer incidence has increased significantly during the past decades and is the most common type of endocrine malignancy. Many factors in thyroid cancers were studied as independent predictors of a poor prognosis.

Objective

The objective of the study was to evaluate survivin expression – BIRC5 and its splice variants: survivin delta Ex3 and survivin 2B in benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Design

Thyroid tissues samples from a group of 50 patients consisting of: 29 patients with thyroid cancers (including medullary, papillary, follicular and undifferentiated types), as well as from 21 patients with non-cancerous thyroid tissues (including: 11 benign thyroid lesions and 10 healthy thyroid samples).

Main Outcome Measures

The analysis of the survivin gene expression and evaluation of the level of splice variants were performed using quantitative RT-PCR.

Results

A statistically significant higher level of expression of survivin gene – BIRC5 was detected in thyroid malignant nodules, when compared with benign lesions and healthy thyroid samples. Moreover, the comparison of survivin relative expression in different staged tumors (pT1, pT3, and pT4) revealed a much higher amount of BIRC5 transcripts in tumor tissues of pT3/pT4. The comparison of survivin expression between benign thyroid nodules and healthy thyroid did not reveal significant differences. Importantly, high expression rate of the survivin delta Ex3 splice variant characterized thyroid carcinomas.

Conclusion

The results suggest that survivin, especially survivin delta Ex3 splice variant being overexpress, is a characteristic feature of thyroid malignancy.

Introduction

Thyroid cancer is the most common type of endocrine malignancy [1]. Well-differentiated thyroid cancers arise from follicular cells and encompass papillary, follicular and Hürthle cell carcinomas. Several different tumor-associated antigens have been described for endocrine malignancies. Clinical and histopathological parameters affecting the course of disease and patient prognosis such as male gender, advanced age, large tumor size, differentiation status and lymph node or distant metastases, have been studied for thyroid cancer [2]. The best known molecules involved in thyroid tumorigenesis include those of RTK/RAS/BRAF/MAP kinase pathway, which is suggested to be involved in the development of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) - the most common type of thyroid cancer. In fact, RAS oncogenes were the first ones to be associated with thyroid cancer, and their mutations were found in benign and malignant follicular neoplasms and in follicular variant PTC [1]. The BRAF mutations are the most common genetic disorder in PTC, found in about 83% of studied cases [3]. However, there are mutations in other genes such as: proto-oncogene RET, MET and VEGFR leading to medullary thyroid cancer [4].

Recently, survivin gene polymorphism and its expression as a prognostic value in thyroid cancer was postulated [5], [6], [7]. Survivin is an anti-apoptotic protein abundantly expressed in a variety of neuroendocrine cancer cells, including pheochromocytoma and GEP tumor cells [8], [9]. Its presence was shown also in various human benign neoplasms, such as breast adenomas, Bowen’s disease, colon polyps and benign tumors, derived from the nervous system [10], [11], [12], [13]. In malignant tumors, survivin expression correlates with poor prognosis, local recurrence and shorter, disease-free survival [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Therefore, it is suggested that survivin may be a negative prognostic marker in the majority of human cancers.

Survivin is the smallest mammalian member of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis gene family with bifunctional roles [20], [21], [22], [23]. It is expressed in proliferating cells, exclusively in the G2 and M phases, but its over-expression in cancer cells is observed throughout the whole cycle [22], [23]. Apart from full-length survivin, which is derived from exons 1–4, four splice variants of the gene have additionally been characterized: survivin 2B, survivin 3B, survivin 2 Alpha and survivin delta Ex3 [24], [25]. Many reports suggest that survivin delta Ex3 and survivin 3B are cytoprotective proteins, while survivin 2 Alpha and survivin 2B have pro-apoptotic properties. Survivin delta Ex3 has also been associated with higher tumor staging, increased tumor aggressiveness, as well as poor prognosis in different human malignancies [26]. Therefore, for many malignant tumors, survivin has been suggested as a new target for anti-cancer therapy. The early results of studies using survivin antagonists [the antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, small interfering RNAs, or immunotherapy (survivin-based vaccines)], are promising [27].

Thus, we decided to determine survivin and its splice variants: survivin 2B, survivin delta Ex3 expression in various malignant and benign thyroid lesions, by reverse transcription followed by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).

Materials and Methods

With approval from the local institutional review board and the ethics committee of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, tissue samples were obtained from 50 patients who had undergone thyroid removal. All participants provided informed written consent. Tissues of all the patients were obtained following surgery performed between 2012 and 2013 at the Department of General, Gastroenterological and Endocrine Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poznan, Poland.

Resected thyroid tissues were immediately stored in RNAs protective medium – RNALater (Sigma Aldrich). The studied group consisted of 29 tissue samples of thyroid cancers including: 19 cases of PTC, 4 cases of undifferentiated thyroid cancer, 4 cases of medullary thyroid cancer, and 2 cases of follicular thyroid cancer (Table 1). According to the TNM classification for thyroid cancer, the examined group included 12 cases of pT3 or 4 and 17 cases of pT1 or pT2. In pT1 staged cancers we found three microcarcinomas. The second group of examined tissues consisted of 21 samples of non-cancerous thyroid tissues. This group was further subdivided into benign thyroid nodules: 4 cases of follicular adenomas, 3 cases of hyperplastic thyroid nodules, 4 cases of colloid nodules and 10 cases of healthy thyroid tissues (from healthy regions of glands removed for thyroid cancer or goiter).

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with thyroid carcinoma.

No. of patients Age Gender Tumor Status/size Nodal status Metastatic status Pathologic subtype Multifocalty
1 61 M pT4 N0 M0 UTC Yes
2 81 F pT3 N0 M0 PTC Yes
3 29 F pT4a N1 M0 PTU Yes
4 31 F pT4a N1 M0 PTU Yes
5 28 F pT2 N1 M0 PTU Yes
6 62 M pT3 N0 M0 PTU No
7 64 M pT2 N0 M0 PTU No
8 50 F pT4 N1 M1 UTC Yes
9 56 F pT1a N0 M0 PTU No
10 59 F pT1b N0 M0 PTU No
11 79 F pT1b N0 M0 PTU No
12 68 F pT4 N0 M0 UTC No
13 38 F pT1b N0 M0 PTU No
14 61 M pT4 N1 M0 MTC Yes
15 78 F pT4 N1 M1 UTC Yes
16 63 M pT1b N0 M0 FTC No
17 46 M pT3 N1 M0 MTC Yes
18 63 M pT1b N0 M0 FTC No
19 79 F pT1 N0 M0 PTC No
20 74 F pT1b N0 M0 MTC Yes
21 68 M pT4 N1 M0 MTC Yes
22 57 F pT1b N0 M0 PTC No
23 32 M pT2 N0 M0 PTC No
24 63 M pT1b N0 M0 PTC No
25 67 M pT4 N1 M0 PTU Yes
26 37 F pT1a N0 M0 PTU No
27 42 F pT1a N0 M0 PTU No
28 42 F pT2 N1 M0 PTU Yes
29 28 F pT1a N0 M0 PTU No

PTC, papillary thyroid cancer, FTC, follicular thyroid cancer, UTC undifferentiated thyroid cancer, MTC, medullary thyroid cancer.

In the examined thyroid cancers group, we found 10 cases with the presence of lymph node metastases, two cases with distal metastases and 13 cases manifesting multifocality.

The patients’ mean age at the moment of thyroid surgery was 54.5 years (aged 28–81 yrs). 19 patients were male (aged 27–65 yrs) and 31 were female (aged 28–81 yrs).

RNA Isolation

Total cellular RNA was extracted using the TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostic), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration of total RNA was determined spectrophotometrically and electrophoretically.

Reverse Transcription and Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

In order to synthestise cDNA one microgram of total RNA was used as a template for reverse transcription using the oligo(dT)10 primer and Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. As a negative control, a “no template control” (NTC) was used, in which reverse transcriptase was replaced with water in the reaction mixture. qPCR assays were designed to enable amplification of: BIRC5 [NCBI: NM_001168], BIRC5-ΔEx3 [NCBI: NM_001012270.1], BIRC5-2B [NCBI: NM_001012271.1] as well as housekeeping gene – HPRT [Human HPRT Gene Assay Cat. No. 05 046 157 001 (Roche Diagnostics)] The nucleotide sequences of primers and hybridization probes are shown in Table 2. qPCR was performed using the TaqMan Master Reagents Kit (Roche Diagnostics). Experiments were performed according to the delivered protocol. PCR efficiencies were calculated from the standard curves, which were generated using serial dilutions of cDNA library constructed from OVCAR3 cell line. Relative expression of analyzed genes was normalized against the phosphoribosylotransferase (HPRT) housekeeping gene (Human HPRT Gene Assay, Roche Diagnostics). Each reaction sets involved template control (NTC, negative control.

Table 2. Primers and hydrolysis probes used in real-time PCR.

Gene TaqMan probe No forward primer 5′→3′ reverse primer 5′→3′ amplicon length
total BIRC5 #36 (Cat. No. 04687949001) gcccagtgtttcttctgctt aaccggacgaatgcttttta 88 bp
BIRC5-ΔEx3 #36 (Cat. No. 04687949001) cagtgtttcttctgcttcaagg cttattgttggtttcctttgcat 77 bp
BIRC5-2B #36 (Cat. No. 04687949001) tctgcttcaaggagctgga aaagtgctggtattacaggcgta 88 bp
HPRT Human HPRT Gene Assay, Cat. No. 05 046 157 001 (Roche Diagnostics)

Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicates, using independently synthesized cDNA. qPCR data was assembled using the LightCycler software 4.05 dedicated for the LightCycler 2.0 (Roche Diagnostics). The obtained data was used in statistical analyses.

Tests were considered to be statistically significant if the P-value was lower than 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with MedCalc version 12.1.3.0 (MedCalc Software). A comparison of the analyzed parameters between two groups was performed with the Mann-Whitney test.

Results

To evaluate the expression levels of survivin and its splice variants (survivin 2B and survivin delta Ex3) in malignant thyroid nodules and non-cancerous thyroid tissues, total RNAs from thyroid tissues were isolated and subjected to RT-qPCR.

The results of the study (presented in Fig. 1) showed that survivin gene BIRC5 was expressed at significantly higher levels in the thyroid cancers (P = 0,0232), than in benign thyroid nodules. Similar results were obtained when survivin delta Ex3 splice variant expression was evaluated. The amount of this splice variant’s transcript was higher in malignant thyroid nodules than in benign thyroid tissues and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (P = 0,0009) (Fig. 1). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0,2267) in survivin 2B expression between benign and malignant thyroid nodules (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Comparison of relative survivin gene expression, survivin 2B expression and survivin delta Ex3 expression in benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Figure 1

Central box represents the values from the lower to upper quartile (25th to 75th percentile). The middle line represents the median. The thin vertical lines extending up or down from the boxes to horizontal lines (so-called whiskers) extend to a multiple of 1,5× the distance of the upper and lower quartile, respectively. Outliers are any values beyond the whiskers.

Survivin and its splice variants mRNA level was also detected at higher levels in thyroid cancers when compared with healthy thyroid tissues (for survivin, P = 0,0127; survivin 2B, P = 0,0221; survivin delta Ex3, P = 0,0008). There was no significant difference between the amount of survivin and its splice variant transcripts in benign thyroid nodules and healthy thyroid samples (for survivin, P = 0,6313; survivin 2B, P = 0,1868; survivin delta Ex3, P = 0,6490).

A comparison of survivin expression in different thyroid cancer samples classified according to the TNM staging system, revealed that survivin and its splice variant survivin 2B mRNA level (P = 0.0052) in tumors staged pT3 and pT4, are much higher than in pT1 tumors. A trend for overexpression of survivin delta Ex3 in tumors staged pT3/pT4 compared with pT1 was observed (P = 0,0548) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Comparison of relative survivin expression in tumors staged pT1 and pT3 or pT4. Central box represents the values from the lower to upper quartile (25th to 75th percentile).

Figure 2

The middle line represents the median. The horizontal line extends from the minimum to the maximum value.

There was no increase in survivin expression of multifocal thyroid cancers (for survivin, P = 0,1418; survivin 2B, P = 0,4360; survivin delta Ex3, P = 0,1592).

A significantly higher level of survivin delta Ex3 was observed in thyroid cancers manifestation of lymph node metastases (P = 0,0388). However, the level of survivin (P = 0,1305), and survivin 2B splice variant (P = 0,7247) showed no differences.

There was also no significant correlation found in relation to age and gender.

Discussion

Despite the large body of research and well-defined clinical effective markers, many studies focus on the molecular features characterizing thyroid cancers. Recently, survivin overexpression was proposed to be a negative prognostic marker for variety of human cancers [28], [29]. Its presence was also documented in thyroid cancers. What it is more, survivin was shown to correlate with tumor aggressiveness and outcome [5], [24], [30].

Survivin has been postulated to be an unfavorable molecule for papillary thyroid cancer, because of the close correlation between high survivin expression and the presence of lymph node metastasis. It is suggested that evaluation of survivin expression in fine needle aspiration samples might be a useful tool for the identification of those PTC patients who require more extensive surgery, as well as careful follow-up and therapeutic strategy [5].

In this study, we evaluated the expression of the BIRC5 gene encoding for the full length of survivin protein and its splice variants: survivin 2B and survivin delta Ex3 in thyroid cancer. The amount of these transcripts was analyzed in benign thyroid nodules, healthy thyroid tissues and carcinoma tissues.

Based on a quantitative RT-PCR technique we demonstrated a significantly higher expression of survivin and its splice variant – survivin delta Ex3 in malignant thyroid nodules as compared with benign tumors. Survivin 2B splice variant was expressed at a higher level in cancers but without statistical importance. Moreover, in our research survivin and both splice variants were expressed at significantly higher levels in the thyroid cancers than in the healthy thyroid tissues.

Our findings are in agreement with previous confirmatory reports of a consistently high expression of survivin in thyroid carcinoma tissues and its absence or downregulation in goiters. Survivin in that study was detected in 26% of goiters (4/15 by semi-quantitative RT-PCR, while its immunoreactivity observed in 87% of thyroid cancers was inversely correlated with the degree of their differentiation [7]. The previous and current research suggest, that survivin mRNA expression increases with any thyroid pathological process and it may vary due to size of thyroid sample cancer.

We also showed that the most prominent expression level of survivin was detected in undifferentiated thyroid cancers. Our findings are concordant with these previous publications [2], [5] They imply that survivin expression may be a marker of a worse prognosis of thyroid carcinoma.

The results of our study are also consistent with the observation regarding the expression of survivin and survivin delta Ex3 splice variant, which were shown to be significantly elevated in PTC when compared with benign tumors [5], [6]. The expression rate of survivin delta Ex3 has been especially shown to retain anti-apoptotic properties. In our study, we also observed a higher survivin delta Ex3 level of expression in thyroid malignant nodules. The relative amount of survivin delta Ex3 transcripts was much higher than the mRNA level of survivin, and survivin 2B.

In addition to an elevated expression level of survivin in many different types of cancer, the correlation between gene polymorphism and the risk of PTC was already documented. It has been shown that in the Iranian population, a polymorphism of the survivin gene at position-31 (G/C) is associated with the presence of more profound manifestations, including lymph node involvement, vascular involvement and multifocality [6]. It was also noted that the up-regulation of survivin protein expression may be enhanced in parallel with the transition towards a poorly differentiated phenotype in human thyroid carcinomas [6], [30].

In the thyroid cancer samples examined in our study, higher survivin 2B expression was found in tumor tissues at stages pT3/pT4 (P = 0,0052). Moreover, a trend of survivin delta Ex3 overexpression in tumors staged pT3/pT4 compared to pT1 was observed (P = 0,0548). Chen et al. previously showed a correlation between pT stages and the presence of lymph node metastases and distant metastases in thyroid carcinoma cases, while they did not observe any significant correlation in relation to gender, age and pathological subtype [7]. In our research, we also did not find any significant correlation in relation to age and gender. The comparison of survivin level and pathological subtypes was not evaluated because of small groups of different types of cancer.

The results of the present study document that the overexpression of survivin, and especially the survivin delta Ex3 splice variant, is a characteristic feature of thyroid cancers. Consequently, according to previous and current reports, the expression of survivin and its splice variants might help decide which patients with thyroid cancers require more aggressive treatment. Further studies on a larger population and a comparison of survivin expression with reference to tumor subtypes might help in our understanding of the role of survivin and its splice variant in thyroid cancers.

Funding Statement

This paper was supported by The Polish Committee for Scientific Research Award nr N N402 523640. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Riesco-Eizaguirre G, Santisteban P (2007) New insights in thyroid follicular cell biology and its impact in thyroid cancer therapy. Endocr Relat Cancer 14: 957–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Miyauchi Ito Y (2009) Prognostic factors and therapetic strategies for differentiated carcinomas of the thyroid. Endocr J 56: 177–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Xing M (2005) BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 12: 245–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hart CD, De Boer RH (2013) Profile of cabozantinib and its potential in the treatment of advanced medullary thyroid cancer. Onco Targets 6: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Selemetjev S, Dencic TI, Marecko I, Jankovic J, Paunovic I, et al. (2014) Evaluation of survivin expression and its prognostic value in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 210: 30–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yazdani N, Sayahpour FA, Hhaghpanah V, Amiri P, Shahrabi-Farahani M, et al.. (2012) Survivin gene polymorphism association with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Pathology 208: 100-. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7. Chen Z, Liu N, Zhu G, Dralle H, Hoang-Vu C (2012) Targeting of the anti-apoptotic gene survivin in human thyroid carcinoma. Int J Mol Med 30: 465–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vikman S, Essand M, Cunningham JL, Torre M, Oberg K, et al. (2005) Gene expression in midgut carcinoid tumors: potential targets for immunotherapy. Acta Onco 44: 32–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grabowski P, Griss S, Arnold CN, Hörsch D, Göke R, et al.. (2005) Nuclear survivin is a powerful novel prognostic marker in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor disease. Neuroendocrinol 81. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10. Jankowska A, Wasko R, Waligórska-Stachura J, Andrusiewicz M, Jaskula M, et al. (2008) Survivin products in pituitary tumors. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 29: 1033–1037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hassounah M, Lach B, Allam A, Al-Khalaf H, Siddiqui Y, et al. (2005) Benign tumors from the human nervous system express high levels of survivin and are resistant to spontaneous and radiation-induced apoptosis. J NeuroOncol 72: 203–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ueda M, Yamashita Y, Takehara M, Terai Y, Kumagai K, et al. (2002) Survivin gene expression in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3452–3459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang YX, Li ML, Yu SG, Liu CM, Han Y, et al. (2013) The association between the Survivin A9194G exon polymorphisms and papillary thyroid carcinoma risk in the Han Chinese population. Pathol Res Pract. 3: 151–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cohen C, Lohmann CM, Cotsonis G, Lawson D, Santoianni R (2003) Survivin expression in ovarian carcinoma: correlation with apoptotic markers and prognosis. Mod Pathol 16: 574–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Monzo M, Rosell R, Felip E, Astudillo J, Sánchez JJ, et al. (1999) A novel anti-apoptosis gene: re-expression of survivin messenger RNA as a prognosis marker in non-small cell lung cancers. J Clin Oncol 17: 2100–2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kato J, Kuwabara Y, Mitani M, Shinoda N, Sato A, et al. (2001) Expression of survivin in esophageal cancer: correlation with the prognosis response to chemotherapy. Int J Cancer 95: 92–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Grabowski P, Kühnel T, Mühr-Wilkenshoff F, Heine B, Stein H, et al. (2003) Prognostic value of nuclear survivin expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 88: 115–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kappler M, Köhler T, Kampf C, Diestelkötter P, Würl P, et al. (2001) Increased survivin transcript levels; an independent negative predictor of survival in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Int J Cancer 95: 360–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Azuhata T, Scott D, Takamizawa S, Wen J, Davidoff A, et al. (2001) The inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin is associated with high risk behavior of neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg 36: 1785–1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Deveraux QL, Reed JC (1999) IAP family proteins-suppressors of apoptosis. Genes Dev 13: 239–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. LaCasse EC, Baird S, Korneluk RG, MacKenzie AE (1998) The inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) and their emerging role in cancer. Oncogene 17: 3247–3259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu EY, Plescia J, Tognin S, et al. (1998) Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature 396: 580–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ambrosini G, Adida C, Altieri DC (1997) A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med 3: 917–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhang HY, Meng X, Du ZX, Fang CQ, Liu GL, et al. (2009) Significance of survivin, caspase-3, and VEGF expression in thyroid carcinoma. Clin Exp Med 9: 207–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Naduparambil KJ, Cooley JV, Shirai K, Chakravarti A (2012) Survivin splice variants are not essential for mitotic progression or inhibition of apoptosis induced by doxorubicin and radiation Onco Targets Ther. 5: 7–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nakano J, Huang C, Liu D (2008) The clinical significance of splice variants and subcellular localization of survivin in non-small cell lung cancers. Br J Cancer 98: 1109–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ryan BM, O’Donovan N, Duffy MJ (2009) Survivin: a new target for anti-cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 7: 553–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Altieri DC (2003) Survivin, versatile modulation of cell division and apoptosis in cancer. Oncogene 22: 8581–8589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Waligórska-Stachura J, Jankowska A, Wasko R, Liebert W, Biczysko M, et al. (2012) Survivin – prognostic tumor biomarker in human neoplasms – review. Ginekol Pol 83: 537–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pannone G, Santoro A, Pasquali D, Zamparese R, Mattoni M, et al.. (2013) The role of survivin in thyroid tumors: differences of expression in well differentiated (WDTC), non-well differentiated (NON-WDTC) and anaplastic (ATC) thyroid cancers. Thyroid 2013 Dec 13. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES