ABSTRACT
In 2 individual cases of canine mast cell tumors, we identified 2 novel c-KIT mutations in exon 11: a 9-base pair (bp) deletion (c.1663-1671del) and a point mutation (c.1676T>A). The 9-bp deletion mutation caused a loss of 3 amino acids, corresponding to p.Gln555_Lys557del, and the point mutation resulted in the substitution of valine by aspartic acid (p.Val559Asp) in the juxtamembrane domain of the protein. Imatinib mesylate, a therapeutic agent for canine mast cell tumors, was used to treat both tumors. Complete remission was achieved at 33 and 14 days after administration, respectively. However, in both cases, the therapeutic response subsequently tapered with the duration of remission lasting 66 and 255 days, respectively. Although these 2 novel c-KIT mutations in exon 11 were not confirmed to be gain-of-function mutations, a further study may help clarify relevance between mutations identified in this report and responsiveness.
Keywords: canine, c-KIT, imatinib mesylate, mast cell tumor, mutation
The c-KIT gene encodes a transmembrane type III receptor tyrosine kinase. Gain-of-function mutations in this gene have been identified in canine mast cell tumors [6, 8]. Although most exon 11 mutations identified thus far are internal tandem duplications (ITDs), other types, such as point mutations, deletions and insertions, have also been reported [8]. In vitro, a part of the mutations result in independent ligand-mediated constitutive phosphorylation of KIT and downstream signal transduction, which may result in the development and/or proliferation of certain canine mast cell tumors. Imatinib mesylate is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which binds to an adenosine triphosphate-binding site on BCR-ABL, KIT, PDGF-R and ABL protein-tyrosine kinase, thus preventing downstream signaling. In humans, this drug has been successfully used as a therapeutic agent for Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor carrying a c-KIT mutation [1, 2]. In veterinary medicine, clinical studies have reported that imatinib mesylate is effective against canine mast cell tumors carrying the ITD mutation on c-KIT in exon 8 or 11 and the c.1523A>T mutation in exon 9 [3, 5, 11]. However, little is known regarding the clinical response of tumors with other exon 11 mutations to imatinib mesylate. In particular, deletions and point mutations comprise 20% of canine mast cell tumor mutations [6]. We describe 2 novel c-KIT mutations in exon 11 (c.1663-1671del and c.1676T>A) identified in 2 individual cases of canine mast cell tumors that responded favorably to imatinib mesylate.
Case 1 was an 11-year-old spayed female mongrel dog weighing 14.1 kg and referred to the Japan Small Animal Cancer Center with bilateral mandibular lymph node metastases from a mast cell tumor. The primary tumor on the muzzle had been completely resected by the referring veterinarian 1 month previously. Initial examination revealed bilateral enlarged mandibular lymph nodes measuring 2.2 × 1.8 × 1.5 cm on the left and approximately 1 cm on the right. No relapse was detected on the muzzle. Cytological examination of the enlarged mandibular lymph nodes by aspiration biopsy showed metastatic tumor cells. Although chemotherapy was initiated with concurrent administration of intravenous vinblastine (Exal; Nipponkayaku, Tokyo, Japan) at 2 mg/m2 weekly and oral prednisolone (Predonin; Shionogi, Osaka, Japan) at 10–15 mg/day, the lymph node lesions progressed rapidly.
Case 2 was a 10-year-old castrated male Yorkshire terrier weighing 4.7 kg and referred to the Japan Small Animal Cancer Center with a mast cell tumor metastasis in the right inguinal lymph node. The primary tumor on the scrotum had been completely resected by the referring veterinarian 6 months previously. Initial examination revealed enlarged inguinal lymph nodes measuring 3.0 × 4.0 cm on the right with no scrotal relapse detectable. No abnormality was found on thoracic radiographs. Abdominal radiographs suggested an enlarged internal iliac lymph node, and abdominal ultrasonography revealed splenomegaly with decreased uniformity of the splenic echo pattern and confirmed enlargement of both internal and external iliac lymph nodes. Cytological examination of the enlarged inguinal and internal iliac lymph nodes by aspiration biopsy showed metastatic tumor cells. Debulking surgery was subsequently performed, followed by intravenous vinblastine at 2 mg/m2 and oral prednisolone at 5 mg/day. However, the inguinal lymph node metastases progressed rapidly. Despite a good clinical response to 70 mg/m2 of lomustine (CeeNU; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., NY, U.S.A.), this therapy had to be withdrawn due to elevated liver enzymes. Two months following the initial administration of lomustine, progression of lymph node lesions was detected again.
Imatinib mesylate (Imatib; Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India, Glivec Tablets; Novartis Pharma KK, Tokyo, Japan) was administered orally each day after a meal at an initial dose of 10 mg/kg. Prednisolone, diphenhydramine and famotidine were administered concomitantly. Although prednisolone had been administered in both cases for 2 months before imatinib treatment start, response to the tumors was not observed. Prednisolone was administered at the same dose (Case 1: 10 mg/day, Case 2: 5 mg/day) concurrently with imatinib in order to prevent Darier’s sign and worsening general condition. In Case 1, masitinib (Masivet; AB Science, Paris, France) was administered orally at 13.3 mg/m2 after imatinib mesylate proved ineffective.
Genomic DNA was prepared from tumor cells collected by fine-needle aspiration using DNAzol Direct (Molecular Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A.). To determine the entire nucleotide sequence of exons, all primers used in the study were designed to be complementary to the intronic regions flanking the exon. The primers for canine c-KIT exon 8, 9 and 11 are as follows: for exon 8, E8F: 5′-agccttggtgaggtgttcca-3′, E8R: 5′-ctaccctgctgtccttccct-3′; for exon 9, E9F: 5′-atgccaattccaatgtgattgattg-3′, E9R: 5′-attgatatggcaggcagagc-3′; and for exon 11: E11F: 5′-catttgttctctaccctaagtgcta-3′, E11R: 5′-gttccctaaagtcattgttacacg-3′. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a total volume of 20 µl, containing 1× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 4 µM each forward and reverse primer and 0.1 unit of Taq polymerase (TaKaRa TaqTM Hot Start Version; Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). After an initial denaturation at 95°C for 120 sec, 35 cycles of amplification were carried out at 94°C for 30 sec, followed by annealing at 60°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 4% agarose gel and visualized with EZVision (Amresco Inc., Solon, OH, U.S.A.). The expected sizes of the PCR products amplified from the wild-type c-KIT for exons 8, 9 and 11 were 228 bp, 330 bp and 277 bp, respectively. The nucleotide sequence of PCR products was determined by direct sequencing using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3730xI Analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.). To ensure fidelity of the direct sequencing results, 3 PCR products prepared separately were sequenced based on the forward and reverse primers used for PCR.
Clinical response to imatinib mesylate in both cases was evaluated based on the RECIST guidelines [10]. The following criteria for antitumor effect were used: complete remission (CR)=disappearance of all target lesions; partial remission (PR)=a decrease of >30% in the sums of the longest diameters of target lesions; progressive disease (PD)=an increase of >20% in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions or the appearance of new lesions; and stable disease (SD)=<30% decrease or <20% increase in the sums of the longest diameters of target lesions. The duration of response was defined as the interval between the observed PR or CR and a recurrence.
In Case 1, aberrant bands that may have been derived from the wild-type and mutant c-KIT were detected by PCR analysis of c-KIT exon 11 (Fig. 1). However, for c-KIT exons 8 and 9, a single band from the wild type was detected. Sequence analysis of the exon 11 amplicon derived from 3 independently amplified PCR products revealed a 9-bp deletion (c.1663-1671del), corresponding to the deletion of Gln555-Try556- Lys557(Fig. 2). No mutation was found on either exon 8 or exon 9 in this case. As the lesion failed to respond to vinblastine, imatinib mesylate was used, taking into consideration the c-KIT mutation detected on exon 11. PR and CR were achieved at days 7 and 33 following administration of imatinib mesylate, respectively. Despite ongoing administration of imatinib mesylate, a relapse of the mast cell tumor was observed in the left mandibular lymph nodes on day 73. The dosage of imatinib mesylate was therefore increased to 12.7 mg/kg and continued for 21 days, but the lesion showed no response to treatment. In this case, the remission duration was 66 days. After imatinib mesylate proved ineffective, masitinib was administered orally for 24 days; again, no response was observed. A transient response to 70 mg/m2 of lomustine lasted for 3 months; subsequently, the lesion continued to grow. The dog succumbed to the progression of mast cell tumor on day 233 after the first administration of imatinib mesylate.
In Case 2, a single band corresponding to the size of the wild type was detected by PCR analysis for c-KIT exons 8, 9 and 11. The dog was treated with imatinib mesylate and achieved CR by day 14. However, a relapse of the mast cell tumor was observed in the inguinal skin on day 269, and the dog died by progression of mast cell tumor on day 328. The remission duration in this case was 255 days. Since the mast cell tumor responded to imatinib mesylate despite the absence of an ITD, the nucleotide sequences of the PCR products from exons 8, 9 and 11 were examined. The nucleotide sequence obtained from the amplicon of exon 11 revealed a point mutation (c.1676T>A) corresponding to p.Val559Asp (Fig. 3); no mutations were found in either exon 8 or exon 9. These results were confirmed in 3 independently amplified PCR products.
We identified 2 novel c-KIT mutations on exon 11 (c.1663-1671del and c.1676T>A) in 2 individual cases of canine mast cell tumors and observed that mast cell tumors with those mutations responded to imatinib mesylate treatment. The 9-bp deletion mutation caused a loss of 3 amino acids, corresponding to p.Gln555_Lys557del and the point mutation resulted in the substitution of valine by aspartic acid (p.Val559Asp) in the juxtamembrane domain of KIT. Previous studies in regard to canine mast cell tumors or gastrointestinal stromal tumors reported several deletion / insertion mutations (p.Glu555_Lys557delinsVal, p.Try556_Lys557del, and p.Try556_Val558delinsPhe) in exon 11 [4, 6], and amino acids at 555–559 may be in hot spots for gain-of-function mutations [6]. It has been demonstrated that KIT carrying mutation (p.Glu555_Lys557delinsVal) caused constitutive ligand-independent phosphorylation which was dependently inhibited by a selective KIT inhibitor in vitro [6]. Indeed, the lesion of mast cell tumor carrying 9-bp deletion mutation in c-KIT exon 11 became small by treatment with imatinib mesylate in this study. Therefore, the 9-bp deletion mutation (p.Gln555_Lys557del) may cause constitutive phosphorylation and be a target for imatinib mesylate. On the other hand, p.Val559Asp which is the same mutation identified in Case 2 has been identified in human patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor [9], who showed objective response to imatinib mesylate [7]. As mentioned above, Val559 may be in a hot spot of mutation. Then, mast cell tumor lesion in Case 2 responded to treatment with imatinib mesylate. Taken together, c.1676T>A (p.Val559Asp) may be related to mast cell tumor growth and be a possible target for imatinib mesylate.
There is no clear evidence that the 2 novel mutations presented in our study are gain-of-function mutations for canine mast cell tumors yet. An in vitro study may help clarify this hypothesis. Some cases without a c-KIT mutation showed responsiveness to imatinib mesylate [3], while many cases with c-KIT mutations also showed a favorable response to imatinib mesylate [3,4,5, 11]. Further research is necessary to better understand the association between each c-KIT mutation and tumor responsiveness to imatinib mesylate.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to all staffs in the Japan Small Animal Medical Center for their assistant and dedicated nursing of the dogs. This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 23925032).
REFERENCES
- 1.Demetri G. D., von Mehren M., Blanke C. D., Van den Abbeele A. D., Eisenberg B., Roberts P. J., Heinrich M. C., Tuveson D. A., Singer S., Janicek M., Fletcher J. A., Silverman S. G., Silberman S. L., Capdeville R., Kiese B., Peng B., Dimitrijevic S., Druker B. J., Corless C., Fletcher C. D., Joensuu H.2002. Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 347: 472–480. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Druker B. J., Talpaz M., Resta D. J., Peng B., Buchdunger E., Ford J. M., Lydon N. B., Kantarjian H., Capdeville R., Ohno-Jones S., Sawyers C. L.2001. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 344: 1031–1037. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Isotani M., Ishida N., Tominaga M., Tamura K., Yagihara H., Ochi S., Kato R., Kobayashi T., Fujita M., Fujino Y., Setoguchi A., Ono K., Washizu T., Bonkobara M.2008. Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate on mast cell tumors in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 22: 985–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.00132.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kobayashi M., Kuroki S., Ito K., Yasuda A., Sawada H., Ono K., Washizu T., Bonkobara M.2013. Imatinib-associated tumour response in a dog with a non-resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour harbouring a c-kit exon 11 deletion mutation. Vet. J. 198: 271–274. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kobayashi M., Sugisaki O., Ishii N., Yamada O., Ito K., Kuroki S., Sasaki Y., Ono K., Washizu T., Bonkobara M.2012. Canine intestinal mast cell tumor with c-kit exon 8 mutation responsive to imatinib therapy. Vet. J. 193: 264–267. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.10.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Letard S., Yang Y., Hanssens K., Palmerini F., Leventhal P. S., Guery S., Moussy A., Kinet J. P., Hermine O., Dubreuil P.2008. Gain-of-function mutations in the extracellular domain of KIT are common in canine mast cell tumors. Mol. Cancer Res. 6: 1137–1145. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lim K. H., Huang M. J., Chen L. T., Wang T. W., Liu C. L., Chang C. S., Liu M. C., Hsieh R. K., Tzen C. Y.2008. Molecular analysis of secondary kinase mutations in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Med. Oncol. 25: 207–213. doi: 10.1007/s12032-007-9014-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma Y., Longley B. J., Wang X., Blount J. L., Langley K., Caughey G. H.1999. Clustering of activating mutations in c-KIT’s juxtamembrane coding region in canine mast cell neoplasms. J. Invest. Dermatol. 112: 165–170. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00488.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tan C. B., Zhi W., Shahzad G., Mustacchia P.2012. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review of case reports, diagnosis, treatment, and future directions. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012: 595968. doi: 10.5402/2012/595968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Therasse P., Arbuck S. G., Eisenhauer E. A., Wanders J., Kaplan R. S., Rubinstein L., Verweij J., Van Glabbeke M., van Oosterom A. T., Christian M. C., Gwyther S. G.2000. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92: 205–216. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamada O., Kobayashi M., Sugisaki O., Ishii N., Ito K., Kuroki S., Sasaki Y., Isotani M., Ono K., Washizu T., Bonkobara M.2011. Imatinib elicited a favorable response in a dog with a mast cell tumor carrying a c-kit c.1523A>T mutation via suppression of constitutive KIT activation. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 142: 101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]