Abstract
Serratia marcescens strain ATCC 14041 was found to be an efficient meso-2,3-butanediol (meso-2,3-BD) producer from glucose and sucrose. Here we present a 5.0-Mb assembly of its genome. We have annotated 4 coding sequences (CDSs) for meso-2,3-BD fermentation and 2 complete operons including 6 CDSs for sucrose utilization.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
As an important commodity chemical, 2,3-butanediol (2,3-BD) can be used as the starting material for some bulk chemicals such as methyl-ethyl-ketone, gamma-butyrolactone, and 1,3-butadiene (1–3). It also has various potential applications in the manufacture of food additives, cosmetics, drugs, and explosives (1). With a heating value of 27,200 J/g, 2,3-BD compares favorably with ethanol (29,100 J/g) for using as a liquid fuel or fuel additive (3). In addition, meso-2,3-BD can also be used to produce renewable polyesters, such as semi-aromatic polyesters for coating applications (4, 5). Microbial production of 2,3-BD has a long history, and various bacteria, such as Serratia marcescens, Bacillus licheniformis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, were used to produce 2,3-BD (2, 6–9). However, among the native 2,3-BD producers, only S. marcescens was reported to be able to produce meso-2,3-BD as the major product (2). Our unpublished results indicated that S. marcescens strain ATCC 14041 is an efficient meso-2,3-BD producer with high productivity (>2 g liter−1 h−1) and high concentration (>100 g liter−1). It was found that the purity of meso-2,3-BD decreased in the fermentation course from 99% to 96%. This might be caused by other enzymes that could catalyze acetoin to (2R,3R)-2,3-BD or (2S,3S)-2,3-BD. To eliminate by-product formation and to enhance the purity of meso-2,3-BD, genetic modification is desirable. Genome sequencing of strain ATCC 14041 will be of great help in this regard.
Here, we present the draft genome sequence of strain ATCC 14041, which was obtained using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 system. The reads for strain ATCC 14041 were assembled into 197 contigs using VELVET (10). The genome annotations were performed by the RAST server (11). The functional descriptions were determined using the Clusters of Orthologous Genes database (12). The G+C content was calculated using the genome sequence.
The draft genome sequence of strain ATCC 14041 consists of 5,047,446 bases with a G+C content of 59.8%. According to the annotation of the RAST system, there are 4,649 protein-coding sequences (CDSs) and 109 RNAs in the genome, among which 2,678 CDSs (58%) were assigned putative biological functions. A total of 574 subsystems were determined using the RAST server in the genome, and this information was used to construct the metabolic network by the RAST system. There are key enzymes for utilization of fructose, mannose, sorbitol, glycerol, and xylitol in strain ATCC 14041, indicating that strain ATCC 14041 may have a wide substrate spectrum. The sequence contains operons and key coding genes for 2,3-BD formation. There is a gene encoding glycerol dehydrogenase which could catalyze (3R)-acetoin to (2R,3R)-2,3-BD (13). These results could provide further insights into production of 2,3-BD. Based on carbohydrate metabolism analysis, six CDSs for the metabolism of sucrose were annotated in two independent gene clusters. This might result in the high efficient utilization of sucrose to produce 2,3-BD.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession no. JGVB00000000 for strain ATCC 14041. The version described in this paper is the first version.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Chinese National Program for High Technology Research and Development (2011AA02A207) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M531165).
Footnotes
Citation Li L, Wang Y, Li K, Su F, Ma C, Xu P. 2014. Genome sequence of meso-2,3-butanediol-producing strain Serratia marcescens ATCC 14041. Genome Announc. 2(3):e00590-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00590-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Celińska E, Grajek W. 2009. Biotechnological production of 2,3-butanediol—current state and prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 27:715–725. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ji XJ, Huang H, Ouyang PK. 2011. Microbial 2,3-butanediol production: a state-of-the-art review. Biotechnol. Adv. 29:351–364. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Syu MJ. 2001. Biological production of 2,3-butanediol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55:10–18. 10.1007/s002530000486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gubbels E, Jasinska-Walc L, Koning CE. 2013. Synthesis and characterization of novel renewable polyesters based on 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid and 2,3-butanediol. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 51:890–898. 10.1002/pola.26446 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gubbels E, Drijfhout JP, Posthuma-van Tent C, Jasinska-Walc L, Noordover BA, Koning CE. 2014. Bio-based semi-aromatic polyesters for coating applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 77:277–284. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.09.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ji XJ, Huang H, Du J, Zhu JG, Ren LJ, Hu N, Li S. 2009. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by Klebsiella oxytoca using a two-stage agitation speed control strategy. Bioresour. Technol. 100:3410–3414. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li L, Su F, Wang Y, Zhang L, Liu C, Li J, Ma C, Xu P. 2012. Genome sequences of two thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis strains, efficient producers of platform chemical 2,3-butanediol. J. Bacteriol. 194:4133–4134. 10.1128/JB.00768-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ma C, Wang A, Qin J, Li L, Ai X, Jiang T, Tang H, Xu P. 2009. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by Klebsiella pneumoniae SDM. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 82:49–57. 10.1007/s00253-008-1732-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhang L, Sun J, Hao Y, Zhu J, Chu J, Wei D, Shen Y. 2010. Microbial production of 2,3-butanediol by a surfactant (serrawettin)-deficient mutant of Serratia marcescens H30. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37:857–862. 10.1007/s10295-010-0733-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829. 10.1101/gr.074492.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, Rao BS, Smirnov S, Sverdlov AV, Vasudevan S, Wolf YI, Yin JJ, Natale DA. 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 4:41. 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang Y, Tao F, Xu P. 2014. Glycerol dehydrogenase plays a dual role in glycerol metabolism and 2, 3-butanediol formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Biol. Chem. 113:525–535. 10.1074/jbc.M113.525535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
