Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e100196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100196

Morphine Enhances HIV-1SF162-Mediated Neuron Death and Delays Recovery of Injured Neurites

Ruturaj R Masvekar 1, Nazira El-Hage 2, Kurt F Hauser 2,3, Pamela E Knapp 1,2,3,*
Editor: Shilpa J Buch4
PMCID: PMC4064991  PMID: 24949623

Abstract

HIV-1 enters the CNS soon after initial systemic infection; within the CNS parenchyma infected and/or activated perivascular macrophages, microglia and astrocytes release viral and cellular toxins that drive secondary toxicity in neurons and other cell types. Our previous work has largely modeled HIV-neuropathology using the individual viral proteins Tat or gp120, with murine striatal neurons as targets. To model disease processes more closely, the current study uses supernatant from HIV-1-infected cells. Supernatant from HIV-1SF162-infected differentiated-U937 cells (HIV+ sup) was collected and p24 level was measured by ELISA to assess the infection. Injection drug abuse is a significant risk factor for HIV-infection, and opiate drug abusers show increased HIV-neuropathology, even with anti-retroviral treatments. We therefore assessed HIV+ sup effects on neuronal survival and neurite growth/pruning with or without concurrent exposure to morphine, an opiate that preferentially acts through µ-opioid receptors. Effects of HIV+ sup ± morphine were assessed on neuronal populations, and also by time-lapse imaging of individual cells. HIV+ sup caused dose-dependent toxicity over a range of p24 levels (10–500 pg/ml). Significant interactions occurred with morphine at lower p24 levels (10 and 25 pg/ml), and GSK3β was implicated as a point of convergence. In the presence of glia, selective neurotoxic measures were significantly enhanced and interactions with morphine were also augmented, perhaps related to a decreased level of BDNF. Importantly, the arrest of neurite growth that occurred with exposure to HIV+ sup was reversible unless neurons were continuously exposed to morphine. Thus, while reducing HIV-infection levels may be protective, ongoing exposure to opiates may limit recovery. Opiate interactions observed in this HIV-infective environment were similar, though not entirely concordant, with Tat/gp120 interactions reported previously, suggesting unique interactions with virions or other viral or cellular proteins released by infected and/or activated cells.

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) disrupts normal immune system function and leads to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). HIV-1 can also induce a wide range of central nervous system (CNS) deficits, collectively known as HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). HIV-1 enters the CNS soon after initial systemic infection [1], [2]. It is widely believed that virus penetrates the CNS within infected monocytes and lymphocytes [2], [3], which normally traffic across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as a part of immune surveillance of the brain. Mature neurons are not infected by HIV-1; instead, infected and/or activated glial cells release various viral and cellular factors that induce direct and/or indirect neuronal toxicity, leading to HAND [2], [4][7]. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), which controls systemic HIV-infection, has improved the health status of a large segment of patients [8][10]. Although cART has reduced the overall severity of neurocognitive disorders in HIV-1 patients, the prevalence of HAND remains at approximately 50% [4], [8], [10][12]. The persistence of relatively high rates of CNS disease is likely due to a combination of longer patient survival, the relatively poor CNS penetrance of most antiretroviral drugs [4], [13], and their neurotoxic effects [14]. Even if the CNS viral load is extremely low or undetectable, neurodegeneration can still occur in response to viral proteins, such as transactivator of transcription (Tat), that are released from cells even when viral replication has been inhibited [15].

Injection drug abusers are at high risk of acquiring HIV-infection due to sharing of contaminated needles and unsafe sexual behavior. Nearly 30% of HIV-infected patients have a history of injection drug abuse involving opiates [16], [17]. Additionally, a subset of HIV+ patients is exposed to opiates through their legitimate use for treatment of AIDS-related chronic pain syndromes. As opiates by themselves are known to induce immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive effects, both in the periphery and CNS [18], [19], it is hypothesized that they may enhance virus spread or otherwise exacerbate disease processes. Experimental evidence also suggests that opiates can interact with HIV-1 or HIV-1-proteins directly on CNS cells and tissues [16], [20][26]. Among patients with HIV-1 infection, those who also abuse opiate drugs show faster progression to AIDS and more severe neurocognitive deficits [27][29].

Many previous studies have modeled HIV-neuropathology using individual viral proteins, such as Tat, glycoprotein 120 (gp120), and others. However, the CNS of HIV-infected patients is not only exposed to individual viral proteins, but instead to all cytokines/chemokines and other cellular products, viral proteins and virus particles released from infected and/or activated cells. Thus, to more closely model HIV-1-mediated neurotoxicity, we have used supernatant from HIV-1SF162-infected differentiated-U937 cells (HIV+ sup). The R5-tropic HIV-1SF162 strain was used since R5-tropic (monocyte/macrophage-tropic) viruses are predominant in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and CNS parenchyma [30], [31].

Multiple outcome measures were studied after HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments, including both cell death and neurite degeneration. Studies in the presence of glia allowed us to distinguish between direct and indirect neurotoxicity. Our results indicate that morphine worsens selective neurotoxic effects of HIV, and that glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) signaling may be a point of convergence. Importantly, morphine limits the ability of neurons to recover from sublethal damage.

Material and Methods

Ethics statement

Experiments were conducted in accordance with procedures reviewed and approved by the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Number: AM10158).

Mixed glial cultures

Cells were cultured from the striatum, a region targeted by HIV where opioid receptor levels are relatively high. Mixed glial cultures (astrocytes and microglia) from mouse striatum were prepared as previously described [23], [24], with minor modifications. Striata from P0-P1 ICR (CD-1) mice (Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Wilmington, MA) were dissected, minced and enzymatically dissociated with trypsin (2.5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase; 0.015 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY) for 30 min at 37°C. Tissue was resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), triturated and filtered through 100 and 40 µm nylon mesh pore filters respectively. Cells were plated and maintained in supplemented DMEM containing 10% FBS.

Neuronal cultures

Mouse striatal neuron cultures were prepared as previously described [23], [24]. Briefly, striata from E15-E16 ICR mice were dissected, minced and enzymatically dissociated with trypsin (2.5 mg/ml) and DNase (0.015 mg/ml) in neurobasal medium (Gibco) for 30 min at 37°C. Tissue was resuspended in neurobasal medium supplemented with B-27 additives (Gibco), L-glutamine (0.5 mM; Gibco) and glutamate (25 µM; Sigma-Aldrich), triturated and filtered twice through 70 µm nylon mesh pore filters. Neurons were plated and maintained in supplemented neurobasal medium. Culture purity was determined by immunocytochemistry using anti-MAP-2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; ab32454) and found to be >80% neurons.

Neuron-mixed glial co-cultures

All cultures were prepared in 24 well plates pre-coated with poly-L-lysine (0.5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich). Neurons were plated alone in 12 wells (neuron cultures); in the remaining 12 wells we established neuron-glia co-cultures as previously described [23]. Briefly, two deep midline grooves were made into the culture surface to restrict the movement of glial cells between sides. Glial cells (2×105 cells/well) were plated on one side of the grooves; when they became confluent (10 d), neurons (0.25×105 cells/well) were plated onto the entire culture surface. In these wells, all neurons are exposed to glial conditioned medium, but neurons on one side of the grooves contact the glial bedlayer, while neurons on the other side grow in isolation on the culture surface. It is difficult to visualize all neurite extensions when neurons are in contact with the glial bedlayer. Thus, the co-culture studies used neurons that did not have direct contact with glia. All cultures were maintained in supplemented neurobasal medium; neurons were allowed to mature for 5–7 d prior to treatment.

Supernatant from HIV-infected cells

U937 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA), a leukemic monocyte cell line originally derived from a histiocytic lymphoma, were plated at 0.5×105 cells/ml in RPMI-1640 media (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, and activated/differentiated with interleukin-2 (IL-2, 100 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), phytohaemagglutinin (PHA, 5 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 100 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), for 48 h. Activated/differentiated cells were treated with Polybrene (2 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37°C, and exposed to HIV-1SF162 (p24 = 50–100 pg/ml; from Dr. Jay Levy [32], through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Germantown, MD). After 7 d, supernatants were collected by filtering through a 0.20 µm filter. HIV infection was confirmed by quantification of p24 levels (HIV-1 p24 Antigen Capture Assay; Advanced Bioscience Laboratories, Rockville, MD) in culture supernatants; a 4-6 fold increase in p24 antigen levels was typical over 7 d. Supernatants from uninfected but differentiated U937 cells (Controlsup) were used as a control. Cell culture supernatants were aliquoted and stored at −80°C.

Treatments

Morphine is the major metabolite of heroin in the CNS [33]; it preferentially targets µ-opioid receptors (MORs). Since opiates by themselves can affect HIV-1 infection and replication [34], it was important to assess the effects of opiate interactions using cell-free supernatants. HIV+ sup or Controlsup were added to neuronal cultures in the presence or absence of morphine sulfate (500 nM; Sigma-Aldrich) ± naloxone (1.5 µM; Sigma-Aldrich), a general opioid receptor antagonist.

MTT assay

At specific times after treatment, cells were rinsed and incubated with 1.2 mM 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Molecular Probes, Grand Island, NY) in fresh, pre-warmed media at 37°C for 4 h. The medium was gently aspirated, and formazan crystals, the product of reduction of MTT by mitochondrial dehydrogenase in live cells, were dissolved in 100 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 10 min. The amount of formazan was measured by absorbance at 540 nm using a PHERAstar microplate reader (BMG LABTECH Inc., Cary, NC).

TUNEL assay

At specific intervals after treatments, cells were fixed overnight at 2–8°C in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich), permeabilized at room temperature in 0.1% Triton-X 100 (Molecular Probes) and 0.1% BSA (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 15 min, and blocked in 0.1% BSA and 1% horse serum for 30 min. Fixed cells were stained for Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL; Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany). Cells were visualized and digital images were acquired using an Axio Observer Z.1 microscope and Zen 2010 software (Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY). Neuronal apoptosis was assessed by manually counting the percentage of TUNEL(+) cells.

Assessment of neuronal viability

In each culture well, at least 50 healthy neurons were initially selected in 6–8 non-overlapping fields. After treatment, repeated images of pre-selected cells were captured at 1 h intervals, using a microscope with a computer-regulated stage (Axio Vision 4.6; Carl Zeiss Inc.) under controlled environmental conditions (37°C, 95% humidity and 5% CO2) [23], [24]. At the end of each experiment, pre-selected neurons were assessed for viability at 6 h intervals in the digital images. Cell death was confirmed using rigorous morphological criteria including abnormal shrinking of the cell body and eventual cell body fragmentation, nuclear destruction, loss of phase-brightness, and excessive neurite loss [23], [24], [35]. In some experiments, live and dead cells were confirmed at the end of the experiment by staining respectively with calcein-AM and ethidium homodimer-1 (LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit; Molecular Probes, Grand Island, NY). Findings were reported as the average percentage of neuron survival, with respect to pre-treatment neuron count ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and analyzed using a repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's post hoc test using Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK).

Assessment of neurite length

At specific intervals after treatments, cells were fixed, permeabilized, blocked, and subsequently stained for TUNEL and MAP-2 (Abcam; ab32454); cells were visualized and digital images were acquired. In digital images, neuritic arborization was quantified only for live [TUNEL(-)] neurons, using modified Sholl analysis. A ‘Sholl score’ was measured by counting the number of intersections of MAP-2-positive neurites with equidistant concentric circles of increasing radius, centered on the cell body [36]. The Sholl score was converted into neurite length in µm via micrometer calibration at the same magnification.

Assessment of neurite growth/regrowth after treatment removal

Prior to treatment, at least 15 healthy neurons were selected in 7–8 non-overlapping fields per well. Repeated images of pre-selected cells were captured at 1 h intervals after treatment onset. After 24 h, cells were gently rinsed with pre-warmed medium and returned either to a ‘control ± opiate environment’, which had Controlsup, or to a ‘HIV ± opiate environment’ which had HIV+ sup (Table 1). We then continued to capture images of the same neurons at 1 h intervals for an additional 48 h (total 72 h). Thus, there were a total of 9 groups with varying exposure times to HIV+ sup or Controlsup, in the presence or absence of morphine ± naloxone; these are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Treatment paradigm for neurite growth/regrowth assessment.

Treatment Groups Treatment from 0 to 24 h Treatment from 24 to 72 h
72 h (C) Control Control
72 h (C+M) Control + Mor Control + Mor
72 h (C+M+N) Control + Mor + Nal Control + Mor + Nal
72 h (H) HIV HIV
72 h (H+M) HIV + Mor HIV + Mor
72 h (H+M+N) HIV + Mor + Nal HIV + Mor + Nal
24 h (H) then 48 h (C) HIV Control
24 h (H+M) them 48 h (C+M) HIV + Mor Control + Mor
24 h (H+M+N) then 48 h (C+M+N) HIV + Mor + Nal Control + Mor + Nal

Control  =  Controlsup; HIV  =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); Mor  =  morphine sulfate (500 nM); Nal  =  naloxone (1.5 µM).

Neurons that remained alive until the experiment end (72 h) were assessed for neuritic arborization in images taken at 0 h, 24 h, and 72 h using Sholl analysis. The findings were reported as average Sholl scores at each time, normalized to pre-treatment (0 h) scores ± SEM. Data were analyzed using a repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test using Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft).

ELISA

Conditioned medium from mixed glial cultures were collected on the schedule described in Table 1 and assessed for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) by ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (BDNF and GDNF ELISAs: Abcam; IL-6 and TNFα ELISAs: R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate was added for color development and plates were read at 450 nm using a PHERAstar microplate reader immediately after terminating the reaction. Protein levels were determined based on a standard curve.

Immunoblotting

Whole cell extracts were prepared using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (cOmplete - protease inhibitor cocktail tablets, and PhosSTOP - phosphatase inhibitor cocktail tablets; Roche), and total protein concentrations were determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL). Cell lysates containing equal amounts of total protein (∼5–10 µg) were heated at 100°C for 5 minutes in laemmli buffer (Sigma-Aldrich), electrophoretically separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Criterion Precast Gel; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Immun-Blot; Bio-Rad). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies for phospho-GSK3β-Ser9 (p-GSK3β-S9; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; 5558), GSK3β (t-GSK3β; Cell Signaling Technology; 9832) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Abcam; ab8245). Appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL) were used. Membranes were detected using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and visualized using a Kodak Image Station 440CF.

Statistical analyses

All data were expressed as average ± SEM. Unless otherwise indicated, data were analyzed statistically using a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's post hoc test using Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft); an α level of p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Dose dependent neuron death and interactions with morphine

To determine the HIV+ sup concentration for subsequent experiments we assessed concentration-dependent toxicity in the presence or absence of 500 nM morphine, a titer chosen to maximally stimulate neuronal and glial MORs in vitro, and to result in dynamic Ca2+ changes and secretion of multiple cytokines and chemokines [21], [23][26], [37][39]. HIV+ sup at p24≥25 pg/ml and above showed significant toxicity even in the absence of morphine in an MTT assay. As expected, there was a concentration-dependent decrease in MTT reduction, indicating lower mitochondrial activity at higher HIV+ sup levels. At p24 concentrations ≤10 pg/ml, HIV+ sup did not affect the MTT assay unless cells were co-exposed to morphine, indicating a significant synergistic effect (Fig. 1). At p24 concentrations ≥25 pg/ml, there were no significant interactions of HIV+ sup with morphine. The MTT assay is a measure of the activity of NADH and NADPH-dependent cellular oxidoreductase enzymes [40][42]. Although it is frequently used as an indicator of cell survival/toxicity or proliferation, it is only an indirect measure. Therefore, neuron survival was directly assayed using time-lapse imaging (Fig. 2). Like the MTT assay, time-lapse image analysis showed a p24 concentration-dependent decrease in neuron survival over a 48 h period (Fig. 2B). In contrast to the MTT assay, time-lapse image analysis also revealed interactive effects between HIV+ sup and morphine on cell death at p24 concentrations of 10 and 25 pg/ml. As a p24 concentration of 25 pg/ml caused significant death/toxicity and also showed interactive effects with morphine, this titer was used in all further experiments. Importantly, 25 pg/ml falls within the range of p24 levels detected in the CSF of HAND patients on antiretroviral therapy (p24 = 43.2±16.8 pg/ml) [43].

Figure 1. Concentration-dependent change in MTT reduction.

Figure 1

Cell toxicity/proliferation was analyzed in neuron cultures at 48 h after treatment using an MTT assay. The findings were reported as percent of control absorbance at 540 nm (A540) ± SEM. Significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n  = 3 separate experiments. All treatment groups, except morphine alone [Control + Mor] and p24 = 10 pg/ml of HIV+ sup [HIV(10)], showed significantly decreased absorbance at 540 nm (*p<0.05 vs. Control), likely reflecting neurotoxicity. HIV+ sup caused a concentration-dependent reduction in A540 ($ p<0.05). Morphine did not show a significant interaction with HIV+ sup at any p24 level. Control  =  Controlsup; HIV  =  HIV+ sup (concentration of p24 in pg/ml is specified in parentheses); Mor  =  morphine sulfate (500 nM).

Figure 2. Concentration-dependent neuronal death in cultures treated with HIV+ sup ± morphine.

Figure 2

Individual striatal neurons were selected prior to treatment and repeatedly imaged for 48(A) Digital images of the same cells/fields, at 0 h, 24 h and 48 h after treatment (white arrowheads indicate cells that have died over the previous 24 h period). Live and dead cells were confirmed at the end of the experiment by staining respectively with calcein-AM (green) and ethidium homodimer-1 (red); scale bar  = 40 µm. (B) Cells were assessed for viability at 6 h intervals in digital images. Findings were reported as the average neuronal survival as a percent of pre-treatment neuron count ± SEM. Significance was analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n = 3 separate experiments (at least 150 neurons per treatment group). Over the period of 48 h, all treatment groups except morphine alone [Control + Mor] and p24 = 10 pg/ml of HIV+ sup alone [HIV(10)], showed significantly reduced neuronal survival (*p<0.05 vs. Control). Neuronal survival declined in a concentration dependent manner with HIV+ sup treatment ($ p<0.05). Morphine showed significant interaction with HIV+ sup, but only at lower levels of exposure (p24 = 10 and 25 pg/ml) (# p<0.05 vs. HIV+ sup alone at corresponding titer). Control  =  Controlsup; HIV  =  HIV+ sup (concentration of p24 in pg/ml is specified in parentheses); Mor  =  morphine sulfate (500 nM).

Toxic effects of HIV ± morphine in neuron cultures

Neuronal apoptosis was assessed using TUNEL staining (Fig. 3); all HIV+ sup treatment groups showed significantly enhanced neuronal apoptosis at all assessed time-points (Fig. 3B; Neuron panel). At all time-points, except 12 h, morphine significantly enhanced HIV+ sup-mediated neuronal apoptosis and the interactive effects of morphine were blocked by naloxone. TUNEL staining is specific for death involving apoptotic pathways, and may not detect all dying neurons. Additionally, TUNEL does not distinguish and permit the exclusion of cells that were dead at the start of the treatment. Time-lapse imaging was used to more exactly follow cell survival/death (Fig. 4). Over the period of 72 h, HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments significantly reduced neuronal survival in cultures without glia (Fig. 4; Neuron panel). Morphine significantly enhanced neuronal death mediated by HIV+ sup, and interactive effects of morphine were blocked by naloxone.

Figure 3. Neuronal apoptosis induced by HIV+ sup ± morphine.

Figure 3

Cells were fixed at specific intervals after treatment and labeled for Hoechst 33342 (blue) and TUNEL (red). (A) Digital images of neuronal cultures at 72 h after treatment; scale bar  = 40 µm. (B) Apoptosis was assessed by manually counting the percentage of TUNEL(+) cells. Findings were reported as the average percentage of TUNEL(+) cells ± SEM. Significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n = 4 separate experiments. At all assessed time points, in both culture systems, all groups exposed to HIV+ sup showed significantly enhanced neuronal apoptosis (*p<0.05 vs. respective C group). In all cases, except at 12 h in cultures with neurons alone, morphine significantly augmented HIV+ sup-mediated neuronal apoptosis (# p<0.05 vs. respective H group). In all cases, except for 72 h in neuron-glia cultures, the interactive effects of morphine were significantly attenuated by naloxone. In most cases, the presence of glia significantly enhanced HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neuron apoptosis ($ p<0.05 vs. corresponding treatment in neuron cultures; compare panels). C =  Controlsup; H =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); M =  morphine sulfate (500 nM); N =  naloxone (1.5 µM).

Figure 4. HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neuronal death.

Figure 4

Neurons were repeatedly imaged for 72-treatment neuron count ± SEM. Significance was analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n = 6 separate experiments. Over the period of 72 h, in both culture systems, all groups exposed to HIV+ sup showed significantly reduced neuronal survival (*p<0.05 vs. C). Morphine significantly enhanced HIV+ sup-mediated neuronal death (# p<0.05 vs. H), and the interactive effects of morphine were blocked by naloxone. In the presence of glia, HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neuronal death was significantly enhanced ($ p<0.05 vs. corresponding treatment in neuronal cultures; compare panels). C =  Controlsup; H =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); M =  morphine sulfate (500 nM); N =  naloxone (1.5 µM).

Sublethal synaptic losses and neuritic pruning are thought to be a major substrate of neurocognitive disorders [4], [44][47]. Therefore, effects of HIV+ sup ± morphine treatment on neuritic arborization were assessed using MAP-2-immunostaining followed by modified Sholl analysis (Fig. 5); only those neurons determined to be alive by TUNEL assay were used in the analysis. At all assessed time-points, HIV+ sup ± morphine treatment groups showed significantly reduced neurite length (Fig. 5B; Neuron panel). Morphine did not show a significant interaction with HIV+ sup at any time.

Figure 5. HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neurite damage.

Figure 5

Cells were fixed at specific intervals after treatment and labeled for MAP-2 (green) and TUNEL (red). (A) Digital images of neuronal cultures at 72 h after treatment; scale bar  = 40 µm. (B) The ‘Sholl score’ was assessed only for TUNEL(-) neurons in the digital images and converted into neurite length in µm via a micrometer-scale calibration. The findings were reported as average total neurite length per neuron (µm) ± SEM. Significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test from n = 4 separate experiments. At all time-points and in both culture systems, all groups exposed to HIV+ sup showed significantly reduced neurite length (*p<0.05 vs. C). Morphine did not show a significant interaction with HIV+ sup treatment. The presence of glia did not have a significant effect on HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neurite damage, but in the presence of glia, Controlsup-treated groups showed significantly longer neurite length ($ p<0.05 vs. corresponding treatment in neuron cultures; compare panels). C =  Controlsup; H =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); M =  morphine sulfate (500 nM); N =  naloxone (1.5 µM).

Role of glia in HIV ± morphine-mediated neurotoxicity

HIV does not infect mature neurons; instead, virotoxins can cause indirect neuron damage via inducing an inflammatory response in activated and/or infected glia [2], [4][7]. To determine the role of glia in HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neurotoxicity, treatments were carried out either in the presence or absence of glia. The presence of glia significantly increased the proportion of HIV+ sup ± morphine-induced TUNEL(+) neurons (Fig. 3B; compare panels). At the earliest time point examined (12 h), HIV+ sup and morphine displayed a significant interaction; however this only occurred in the presence of glia. Thus, glia appeared to accelerate the HIV+ sup-morphine interaction. At all time points except 72 h, the interactive effects of morphine were significantly attenuated by naloxone. Chronic exposure to naloxone is occasionally ineffective, even when acute blockade reverses morphine effects [48]. This may be due to blocking the cellular effects of the multiple opioids normally released by glia [49], [50]. The presence of glia significantly enhanced HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neuron death over the entire 72 h experimental period (Fig. 4; compare panels).

In the subpopulation of neurons that survived, HIV+ sup induced significant neurite pruning or growth arrest. The presence of glia did not significantly affect HIV+ sup-induced neurite pruning, even when neurons were co-exposed to morphine. In fact, in the presence of glia, Controlsup-treated groups had significantly longer neurites (Fig. 5B; compare panels).

Reversibility of HIV ± morphine-mediated neurite damage

Neurons appear to recover from certain types of sublethal damage caused by HIV-related insults [4], [44], [46]. Therefore, the reversibility of HIV- and morphine-mediated neurite damage was tested. HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments caused significant neurite growth arrest over the period of 24 h in cultures without glia (Fig. 6B; Neuron panel). With continuous exposure to HIV+ sup ± morphine for 72 h, neurite length remained significantly reduced. When HIV+ sup was removed at 24 h, neurites resumed their growth. Interestingly, sustained exposure to morphine by itself was sufficient to reduce and/or delay neurite recovery/outgrowth despite the removal of HIV+ sup. This effect of morphine was blocked by naloxone.

Figure 6. Reversibility of HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated neurite damage.

Figure 6

Images of pre-selected neurons were captured for 24 h after initial treatments, and for an additional 48 h after treatments were changed as described in Table 1. (A) Digital images of neuronal cultures after specified time and treatments (white arrowheads indicate area of neurite outgrowth since previous image); scale bar  = 40 µm. (B) Neurons that remained alive until the experiment end (72 h) were assessed for their arborization in images taken at 0, 24 and 72 h, using Sholl analysis. The findings were reported as average Sholl scores at each time, normalized to pre-treatment (0 h) scores ± SEM. Significance was analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n = 45–60 neurons per treatment group (sampled from 3 separate experiments; at least 15 neurons per group per experiment). Over the period of 24 h, and in both culture systems, HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments induced neurite growth arrest; in neuron-glia co-cultures, HIV+ sup + morphine treatment appeared to cause neurite pruning (*p<0.05 vs. 0 h, for corresponding treatment). After removing HIV+ sup at 24 h, neurite growth arrest was reversible ($ p<0.05 vs. 24 h, for corresponding treatment); however, if HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments were continued for 72 h, then neurite growth arrest was persisted. If morphine treatment continued after the removal of HIV+ sup, neurite outgrowth was significantly reduced/delayed compared to neurons returned to Controlsup (# p<0.05 vs. ‘24 h (H) then 48 h (C)’). This effect of morphine was blocked by naloxone. In the presence of glia, neurite outgrowth after removal of HIV+ sup was significantly enhanced, even in the continued presence of morphine (§ p<0.05 vs. corresponding treatment and time point in neuronal cultures; compare panels). C =  Controlsup; H =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); M =  morphine sulfate (500 nM); N =  naloxone (1.5 µM).

Since glia support neurite outgrowth and synapse remodeling through multiple mechanisms [51][54] we tested whether glia play a role in the reversibility of HIV- and morphine-mediated neurite pruning/growth arrest. As in the neuron-only cultures, HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments caused significant neurite growth arrest over 24 h when glia were present (Fig. 6B; Neuron-glia panel). In the presence of glia, neurite outgrowth was significantly faster after removal of HIV+ sup than it was in neuron-only cultures (Fig. 6B; compare panels).

HIV- and morphine-mediated effects on secretion of growth factors and cytokines by glia

Our results show that glial effects on neuron injury and recovery are dependent on the context of HIV and morphine. Glia enhanced HIV-driven neuronal death (Fig. 3B and 4), but accelerated neurite recovery after removal of HIV (Fig. 6B). To determine how glia might direct these outcomes, we examined whether HIV and morphine affect glial production of secreted factors known to influence neuronal survival and outgrowth. ELISA was used to assay levels of the neurotrophic factors (BDNF and GDNF), as well as cytokines (IL-6 and TNFα) that indicate glial inflammatory activation (Fig. 7); they showed multiple response patterns. BDNF levels were significantly reduced by HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments. BDNF recovered to control levels after removal of HIV+ sup, even though morphine remained present. GDNF levels were unaffected by any treatment. IL-6 levels were increased by HIV+ sup or morphine treatment alone, and in addition, morphine significantly augmented the effect of HIV+ sup. Although IL-6 levels returned to control after removal of HIV+ sup, the elevated levels were maintained in the continued presence of morphine. TNFα release was significantly increased by HIV+ sup alone, but not by morphine alone, although morphine co-treatment augmented the effect of HIV+ sup. TNFα levels returned to control after removal of HIV+ sup, even in the continuous presence of morphine. Thus, among the secreted factors whose levels were influenced by HIV and morphine, BDNF, TNFα and IL-6 responded to HIV+ sup alone, while only IL-6 was affected by morphine itself. Both TNFα and IL-6 showed HIV-morphine interactive effects. Only IL-6 continued to respond to morphine exposure after HIV removal.

Figure 7. HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated effects on secretion of growth factors and cytokines by glia.

Figure 7

After specified times and treatments, conditioned medium from mixed glial cultures was collected and assessed for levels of BDNF, GDNF, IL-6 and TNFα by ELISA; Growth factor/cytokine levels were determined based on a standard curve. The findings were reported as average concentrations (pg/ml) ± SEM. Significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n = 3 separate experiments. BDNF: HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments significantly reduced levels of BDNF (*p<0.05 vs. ‘72 h (C)’); after removal of HIV+ sup, BDNF returned to control levels ($ p<0.05). GDNF: HIV+ sup ± morphine treatments did not have significant effects on GDNF levels. IL-6: HIV+ sup treatment significantly enhanced levels of IL-6; morphine treatment alone also significantly elevated IL-6 levels (*p<0.05 vs. ‘72 h (C)’), and morphine co-treatment significantly augmented HIV+ sup-mediated effects (# p<0.05). After removal of HIV+ sup, IL-6 returned to control levels ($ p<0.05); in the continuous presence of morphine, IL-6 remained at a significantly higher level than control (*p<0.05) and [24 h (H) then 48 h (C)]-treatment group (# p<0.05). TNFα: HIV+ sup treatment significantly enhanced levels of TNFα (*p<0.05 vs. ‘72 h (C)’); morphine co-treatment significantly enhanced the HIV+ sup-mediated effect (# p<0.05). After removal of HIV+ sup, TNFα levels returned to control values ($ p<0.05). C =  Controlsup; H =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); M =  morphine sulfate (500 nM).

GSK3β as a point of convergence for HIV and morphine

Previous studies have shown that HIV-1 induces neurotoxic effects by enhanced activation of GSK3β [55][60], and that GSK3β is also linked to neuropathology seen with opiate-abusing patients [61], [62]. We therefore tested whether GSK3β might be a site of HIV and morphine interactions. Neurons grown in isolation were lysed at 24 h after treatments with HIV+ sup ± morphine and immunoblotted for phospho-GSK3β-Ser9 (p-GSK3β-S9; an inactive form of GSK3β [63][66]), GSK3β (total GSK3β; t-GSK3β) and GAPDH (Fig. 8). HIV+ sup and morphine by themselves induced significant reduction in p-GSK3β-S9 with respect to t- GSK3β. Morphine co-treatment significantly augmented HIV+ sup-mediated effects. All of the effects of morphine were blocked by naloxone.

Figure 8. HIV+ sup ± morphine-mediated GSK3β activation.

Figure 8

Cells were lysed and immunoblotted for p-GSKβ-S9 (an inactive form of GSKβ), t- GSKβ (total GSKβ) and GAPDH in neuronal cultures at 24 h after treatment. Findings were reported as a percent of control values of p-GSKβ-S9 levels normalized with t-GSKβ (p-GSKβ-S9/t-GSKβ) ± SEM. Significance was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post hoc test, from n = 3 separate experiments. HIV+ sup caused significant loss of p-GSKβ-S9 (*p<0.05 vs. C). Treatment with morphine alone also caused significant loss of p-GSKβ-S9, and morphine co-treatment significantly augmented the HIV+ sup-mediated effect (# p<0.05). The effects of morphine were blocked by naloxone. C =  Controlsup; H =  HIV+ sup (p24 = 25 pg/ml); M =  morphine sulfate (500 nM); N =  naloxone (1.5 µM).

Discussion

Our studies conclusively show that opiates can directly exacerbate the deleterious effects of HIV-1 on neurons in an infective model in vitro, although past studies have demonstrated that morphine interacts with the HIV-1 proteins Tat [21], [23] and gp120 [24]. The present studies also confirm and extend prior findings of glial involvement in interactions between opiates and HIV proteins, demonstrating that combined morphine and HIV-1SF162 neurotoxicity can be amplified in the presence of glia. Lastly, we found that continuous morphine exposure significantly restricted the ability of neurons to recover from exposure to HIV+ sup. This suggests that HIV-opiate co-exposure may trigger maladaptive cellular responses that persist in the presence of opiates alone, even after HIV infection is mitigated. Importantly, this situation is relevant to opiate-exposed patients whose HIV infection is controlled with cART.

Experimental models for HIV ± opiate-mediated neurotoxicity

Since HIV is a human-specific disease, models in other species have deficiencies as well as strengths. For example, non-human primates have been an invaluable model to assess interactive effects of the HIV-like simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and opiates [67], [68]. However, limited availability and the lack of established simian culture models make mechanistic studies difficult. There are rodent in vivo models that closely mimic viral infection, including an HIV-1 transgenic rat that expresses a majority of HIV-1 proteins without viral replication [69], and “humanized” SCID mice in which establishment of a human immune system in mice permits HIV infection [70]. However, in both cases the peripheral and central target cells are those of the rodent host. Our past in vivo studies have used a Tat transgenic mouse in which Tat production is largely restricted to the CNS [20], [25], and we have also examined effects of HIV-1 proteins on murine cells in vitro [21], [23], [24], [35], [71], [72]. In general, the findings in culture have paralleled outcomes in vivo; all have closely modeled key aspects of neurodegeneration and inflammatory biomarker production seen clinically in the CNS. We are specifically interested in effects on striatal neurons, since the striatum is a major target of HIV-1, and since levels of opioid receptors in the striatum are relatively high [21], [73], [74]. Although primary human cells may be preferable as an in vitro model, we have used murine targets since human neurons/glia from specific brain regions are not consistently available, and outcomes frequently show regional specificity [75], [76]. Additionally, murine cultures (a) eliminate human genetic variability in terms of MOR [77], CCR5 [78], [79], and other factors that influence infective and neurodegenerative processes; and, (b) are free from any confounding effects of morphine on HIV replication in human microglia [34]. Still, the issue of species mixing must be considered when interpreting results in this model.

Neurotoxicity induced by HIV ± morphine

The extent to which opiates contribute to the progression of HAND in the era of cART remains controversial, although some large clinical studies now support moderate interactive effects [27], [29]. Opiate drugs of abuse have been shown to enhance particular damaging effects of HIV-1 proteins in vitro [21][24], [72]. However, the CNS of HIV-1-infected patients is exposed to a great many other cellular and viral factors released from infected and/or activated cells. Current studies therefore used supernatant from HIV-infected cells to more fully represent the variety of those toxic and protective elements. HIV+ sup caused neuronal death in a concentration-dependent manner over a range of p24 levels (10–500 pg/ml, Fig. 1 and 2), but significant morphine interactions were observed only at lower p24 levels (10 and 25 pg/ml). Very high levels of neuronal death at p24≥100 pg/ml may have masked interactive effects. If, as our data suggest, HIV-1-opiate interactions are partly governed by the level of infection, HIV-1 patients receiving cART may be especially vulnerable to opiate interactions since cART has greatly reduced the viral load [8][10]. The sensitivity of HIV-opiate interactions to levels of infection may also explain some controversy concerning the role of opiates in severity of HAND.

Since synaptic losses and neuritic pruning/degeneration are thought to be the principal substrate underlying HAND [4], [44][47], we also examined length of neurites in cells that survived treatments. Our results show that HIV+ sup reduced the length of neurites, but unlike the cell death results, there were no significant morphine interactions (Fig. 5). Since HIV+ sup and morphine can induce multiple pathways, it is easily envisioned that interactions may differ between outcome measures. In some instances, cumulative reductions in synapses and dendritic simplification may culminate in cell death. Alternatively, neurite pruning may result in significant loss of cellular functions, but neurons may remain alive [71], [80]. Control treated groups actually showed an increase in the length of neurites over the same timeframe. This suggests that neurite length changes mainly reflected neurite growth arrest/inhibition. Results from repeated neurite length assessments of individual cells (Fig. 6) support this hypothesis. These conclusions are in conflict with some previous studies [71], [72], [81], where reduction in neurite length was mainly attributed to pruning of existing neurites. Disparate findings may reflect different types of neurons, their age and relative maturity, the response of neurons to individual viral proteins versus the multiple stimuli in HIV+ sup, and the selection criteria for neurons; we specifically evaluated sub-lethal neurite length changes by assessing only [TUNEL(-)] cells instead of the entire population.

Although many experimental and epidemiological studies have indicated a link between opiate drug exposure and HAND severity, the mechanisms underlying interactions between HIV-1 and opiates remain largely obscure. HIV-1 is known to induce neurotoxic effects through abnormal activation of GSK3β, and the GSK3β inhibitors, lithium (Li) and sodium valproate (VPA), ameliorate HIV-1-mediated neurotoxicity [55][60]. GSK3β signaling is also implicated in neuropathologic responses to opiates. For example, the accelerated deposition of hyperphosphorylated tau that occurs in the CNS of young opiate abusers [61], [62] may be related to elevated GSK3β expression seen in opiate abusers [61] since GSK3β is a principal tau kinase [82][84]. GSK3β plays a crucial role in regulating the levels and function of various structural and signaling proteins in neurons including tau, MAP2, β-catenin, activator protein 1 (AP-1), cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB), heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1), and among others, all of which regulate neuronal plasticity, gene expression and survival [65], [66], [85]. GSK3β is thus well-positioned to be a potential convergence point for interactions between HIV-1 and opiates that regulate neuronal damage. Our results show that morphine co-exposure significantly augments HIV+ sup-mediated GSK3β-activation (Fig. 8), supporting this hypothesis.

Role of glia in HIV ± morphine-mediated neurotoxicity

Opiates exacerbate the release of numerous factors with neurotoxic potential from glia exposed to HIV [16], [26], [86], and alone or in concert with HIV can disrupt certain neuron-supportive functions of glia, including glutamate buffering, free radical scavenging, phagocytosis and release of neurotrophic factors [23], [86][88]. It is easily appreciated that glia might play a crucial role in HIV-opiate interactions; in our previous studies glia were actually required for interactive neurotoxicity between morphine and HIV-1 Tat [23]. In the present study, morphine significantly enhanced HIV+ sup-mediated striatal neuron death even in the absence of glia. One obvious interpretation is that morphine interacts with factors in addition to HIV-1 Tat in the HIV+ sup. Even among R5 strains, unique gp120 sequences may result in a different degree of interaction between opiates and HIV [24]. While glia are clearly important determinants of neurotoxic HIV-opiate interactions, some interactions, perhaps those involving factors other than Tat, seem to occur directly upon neurons.

Glia also modified neurite recovery, enhancing outgrowth when HIV was removed. The effect of glia on neurons is never entirely positive or negative but instead reflects the net input of various effectors that either promote or damage neurite/neuron structure and function [51][54]. In this context, our finding that glial production of BDNF is suppressed by HIV+ sup but then rebounds to control levels after removal of HIV+ sup shows a return towards a more trophic glial function. The normalization of proinflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-6 after HIV removal indicates a similar trend, although note that continued exposure to morphine partly abrogates the effect of removing HIV (Fig. 7).

Overall, our results show that cellular and viral products released from HIV-1SF162-infected leukemic monocytes have significant negative consequences on striatal neurons. Coincident exposure to morphine worsens neuronal outcomes in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. This is especially true when glia are present, although the net effects of glial exposure depend upon the local levels of virus and opiates. At lower viral titers, HIV+ sup has sublethal effects on growth of neurite arbors, indicating that neurons may undergo functional changes long before they die. This may be quite relevant to the situation in HIV-infected patients where dendritic/synaptic plasticity, not neuron death, is the presumed substrate of HAND. Diminished infection levels in the CNS are probably critical in reversing HIV-driven neurite damage, although our results caution that chronic exposure to opiates may inflict damage even in the absence of HIV.

Funding Statement

NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) - DA034231 [Knapp]; NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) - DA034231 [Hauser]; NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) - DA027374 [Hauser]; NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) - DA033200 [Hauser]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Davis LE, Hjelle BL, Miller VE, Palmer DL, Llewellyn AL, et al. (1992) Early viral brain invasion in iatrogenic human immunodeficiency virus infection. Neurology 42: 1736–1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kramer-Hammerle S, Rothenaigner I, Wolff H, Bell JE, Brack-Werner R (2005) Cells of the central nervous system as targets and reservoirs of the human immunodeficiency virus. Virus Res 111: 194–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu Y, Tang XP, McArthur JC, Scott J, Gartner S (2000) Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp160 sequences from a patient with HIV dementia: evidence for monocyte trafficking into brain. J Neurovirol 6 Suppl 1S70–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ellis R, Langford D, Masliah E (2007) HIV and antiretroviral therapy in the brain: neuronal injury and repair. Nat Rev Neurosci 8: 33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Epstein LG, Gendelman HE (1993) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of the nervous system: pathogenetic mechanisms. Ann Neurol 33: 429–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Garden GA (2002) Microglia in human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurodegeneration. Glia 40: 240–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Xiong H, Zeng YC, Lewis T, Zheng J, Persidsky Y, et al. (2000) HIV-1 infected mononuclear phagocyte secretory products affect neuronal physiology leading to cellular demise: relevance for HIV-1-associated dementia. J Neurovirol 6 Suppl 1S14–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cysique LA, Maruff P, Brew BJ (2004) Prevalence and pattern of neuropsychological impairment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) patients across pre- and post-highly active antiretroviral therapy eras: a combined study of two cohorts. J Neurovirol 10: 350–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dore GJ, McDonald A, Li Y, Kaldor JM, Brew BJ (2003) Marked improvement in survival following AIDS dementia complex in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 17: 1539–1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cysique LA, Brew BJ (2009) Neuropsychological functioning and antiretroviral treatment in HIV/AIDS: a review. Neuropsychol Rev 19: 169–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sacktor N (2002) The epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurological disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Neurovirol 8 Suppl 2115–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Robertson KR, Smurzynski M, Parsons TD, Wu K, Bosch RJ, et al. (2007) The prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive impairment in the HAART era. AIDS 21: 1915–1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kerza-Kwiatecki AP, Amini S (1999) CNS as an HIV-1 reservoir; BBB and drug delivery. J Neurovirol 5: 113–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Robertson K, Liner J, Meeker RB (2012) Antiretroviral neurotoxicity. J Neurovirol 18: 388–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Johnson TP, Patel K, Johnson KR, Maric D, Calabresi PA, et al. (2013) Induction of IL-17 and nonclassical T-cell activation by HIV-Tat protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 13588–13593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bokhari SM, Yao H, Bethel-Brown C, Fuwang P, Williams R, et al. (2009) Morphine enhances Tat-induced activation in murine microglia. J Neurovirol 15: 219–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Robertson JR, Ronald PJ, Raab GM, Ross AJ, Parpia T (1994) Deaths, HIV infection, abstinence, and other outcomes in a cohort of injecting drug users followed up for 10 years. BMJ 309: 369–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rogers TJ, Peterson PK (2003) Opioid G protein-coupled receptors: signals at the crossroads of inflammation. Trends Immunol 24: 116–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sheng WS, Hu S, Gekker G, Zhu S, Peterson PK, et al. (1997) Immunomodulatory role of opioids in the central nervous system. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 45: 359–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fitting S, Xu R, Bull C, Buch SK, El-Hage N, et al. (2010) Interactive comorbidity between opioid drug abuse and HIV-1 Tat: chronic exposure augments spine loss and sublethal dendritic pathology in striatal neurons. Am J Pathol 177: 1397–1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gurwell JA, Nath A, Sun Q, Zhang J, Martin KM, et al. (2001) Synergistic neurotoxicity of opioids and human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat protein in striatal neurons in vitro. Neuroscience 102: 555–563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hu S, Sheng WS, Lokensgard JR, Peterson PK (2005) Morphine potentiates HIV-1 gp120-induced neuronal apoptosis. J Infect Dis 191: 886–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zou S, Fitting S, Hahn YK, Welch SP, El-Hage N, et al. (2011) Morphine potentiates neurodegenerative effects of HIV-1 Tat through actions at mu-opioid receptor-expressing glia. Brain 134: 3616–3631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Podhaizer EM, Zou S, Fitting S, Samano KL, El-Hage N, et al. (2012) Morphine and gp120 Toxic Interactions in Striatal Neurons are Dependent on HIV-1 Strain. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 7: 877–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bruce-Keller AJ, Turchan-Cholewo J, Smart EJ, Geurin T, Chauhan A, et al. (2008) Morphine causes rapid increases in glial activation and neuronal injury in the striatum of inducible HIV-1 Tat transgenic mice. Glia 56: 1414–1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. El-Hage N, Gurwell JA, Singh IN, Knapp PE, Nath A, et al. (2005) Synergistic increases in intracellular Ca2+, and the release of MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-6 by astrocytes treated with opiates and HIV-1 Tat. Glia 50: 91–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bell JE, Arango JC, Robertson R, Brettle RP, Leen C, et al. (2002) HIV and drug misuse in the Edinburgh cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 31 Suppl 2S35–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Martinez AJ, Sell M, Mitrovics T, Stoltenburg-Didinger G, Iglesias-Rozas JR, et al. (1995) The neuropathology and epidemiology of AIDS. A Berlin experience. A review of 200 cases. Pathol Res Pract 191: 427–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Byrd DA, Fellows RP, Morgello S, Franklin D, Heaton RK, et al. (2011) Neurocognitive impact of substance use in HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 58: 154–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Spudich SS, Huang W, Nilsson AC, Petropoulos CJ, Liegler TJ, et al. (2005) HIV-1 chemokine coreceptor utilization in paired cerebrospinal fluid and plasma samples: a survey of subjects with viremia. J Infect Dis 191: 890–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Soulie C, Tubiana R, Simon A, Lambert-Niclot S, Malet I, et al. (2009) Presence of HIV-1 R5 viruses in cerebrospinal fluid even in patients harboring R5X4/X4 viruses in plasma. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 51: 60–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cheng-Mayer C, Levy JA (1988) Distinct biological and serological properties of human immunodeficiency viruses from the brain. Ann Neurol 23 Suppl: S58–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sawynok J (1986) The therapeutic use of heroin: a review of the pharmacological literature. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 64: 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Peterson PK, Gekker G, Hu S, Cabral G, Lokensgard JR (2004) Cannabinoids and morphine differentially affect HIV-1 expression in CD4(+) lymphocyte and microglial cell cultures. J Neuroimmunol 147: 123–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Singh IN, Goody RJ, Dean C, Ahmad NM, Lutz SE, et al. (2004) Apoptotic death of striatal neurons induced by human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat and gp120: Differential involvement of caspase-3 and endonuclease G. J Neurovirol 10: 141–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sholl DA (1953) Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. J Anat 87: 387–406. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ikeda H, Miyatake M, Koshikawa N, Ochiai K, Yamada K, et al. (2010) Morphine modulation of thrombospondin levels in astrocytes and its implications for neurite outgrowth and synapse formation. J Biol Chem 285: 38415–38427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Miyatake M, Rubinstein TJ, McLennan GP, Belcheva MM, Coscia CJ (2009) Inhibition of EGF-induced ERK/MAP kinase-mediated astrocyte proliferation by mu opioids: integration of G protein and beta-arrestin 2-dependent pathways. J Neurochem 110: 662–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. El-Hage N, Bruce-Keller AJ, Yakovleva T, Bazov I, Bakalkin G, et al. (2008) Morphine exacerbates HIV-1 Tat-induced cytokine production in astrocytes through convergent effects on [Ca(2+)](i), NF-kappaB trafficking and transcription. PLoS One 3: e4093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Berridge MV, Tan AS (1993) Characterization of the cellular reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT): subcellular localization, substrate dependence, and involvement of mitochondrial electron transport in MTT reduction. Arch Biochem Biophys 303: 474–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Liu Y, Peterson DA, Kimura H, Schubert D (1997) Mechanism of cellular 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction. J Neurochem 69: 581–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. van Meerloo J, Kaspers GJ, Cloos J (2011) Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods Mol Biol 731: 237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Royal W 3rd, Selnes OA, Concha M, Nance-Sproson TE, McArthur JC (1994) Cerebrospinal fluid human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) p24 antigen levels in HIV-1-related dementia. Ann Neurol 36: 32–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bellizzi MJ, Lu SM, Gelbard HA (2006) Protecting the synapse: evidence for a rational strategy to treat HIV-1 associated neurologic disease. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 1: 20–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Everall IP, Heaton RK, Marcotte TD, Ellis RJ, McCutchan JA, et al. (1999) Cortical synaptic density is reduced in mild to moderate human immunodeficiency virus neurocognitive disorder. HNRC Group. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. Brain Pathol 9: 209–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kim HJ, Martemyanov KA, Thayer SA (2008) Human immunodeficiency virus protein Tat induces synapse loss via a reversible process that is distinct from cell death. J Neurosci 28: 12604–12613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Masliah E, Heaton RK, Marcotte TD, Ellis RJ, Wiley CA, et al. (1997) Dendritic injury is a pathological substrate for human immunodeficiency virus-related cognitive disorders. HNRC Group. The HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. Ann Neurol 42: 963–972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hauser KF, Hahn YK, Adjan VV, Zou S, Buch SK, et al. (2009) HIV-1 Tat and morphine have interactive effects on oligodendrocyte survival and morphology. Glia 57: 194–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. McMillian MK, Hong JS (1994) Regulation of preproenkephalin expression in astrocytes: is there a role for glia-derived opioid peptides in reactive gliosis? Crit Rev Neurobiol 9: 91–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sargeant TJ, Miller JH, Day DJ (2008) Opioidergic regulation of astroglial/neuronal proliferation: where are we now? J Neurochem 107: 883–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chung WS, Clarke LE, Wang GX, Stafford BK, Sher A, et al. (2013) Astrocytes mediate synapse elimination through MEGF10 and MERTK pathways. Nature. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52. Hatten ME, Lynch M, Rydel RE, Sanchez J, Joseph-Silverstein J, et al. (1988) In vitro neurite extension by granule neurons is dependent upon astroglial-derived fibroblast growth factor. Dev Biol 125: 280–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Le R, Esquenazi S (2002) Astrocytes mediate cerebral cortical neuronal axon and dendrite growth, in part, by release of fibroblast growth factor. Neurol Res 24: 81–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Rousselet A, Fetler L, Chamak B, Prochiantz A (1988) Rat mesencephalic neurons in culture exhibit different morphological traits in the presence of media conditioned on mesencephalic or striatal astroglia. Dev Biol 129: 495–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Crews L, Patrick C, Achim CL, Everall IP, Masliah E (2009) Molecular pathology of neuro-AIDS (CNS-HIV). Int J Mol Sci 10: 1045–1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Dou H, Birusingh K, Faraci J, Gorantla S, Poluektova LY, et al. (2003) Neuroprotective activities of sodium valproate in a murine model of human immunodeficiency virus-1 encephalitis. J Neurosci 23: 9162–9170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Dou H, Ellison B, Bradley J, Kasiyanov A, Poluektova LY, et al. (2005) Neuroprotective mechanisms of lithium in murine human immunodeficiency virus-1 encephalitis. J Neurosci 25: 8375–8385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Everall IP, Bell C, Mallory M, Langford D, Adame A, et al. (2002) Lithium ameliorates HIV-gp120-mediated neurotoxicity. Mol Cell Neurosci 21: 493–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Maggirwar SB, Tong N, Ramirez S, Gelbard HA, Dewhurst S (1999) HIV-1 Tat-mediated activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta contributes to Tat-mediated neurotoxicity. J Neurochem 73: 578–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Sui Z, Sniderhan LF, Fan S, Kazmierczak K, Reisinger E, et al. (2006) Human immunodeficiency virus-encoded Tat activates glycogen synthase kinase-3beta to antagonize nuclear factor-kappaB survival pathway in neurons. Eur J Neurosci 23: 2623–2634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Anthony IC, Norrby KE, Dingwall T, Carnie FW, Millar T, et al. (2010) Predisposition to accelerated Alzheimer-related changes in the brains of human immunodeficiency virus negative opiate abusers. Brain 133: 3685–3698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Ramage SN, Anthony IC, Carnie FW, Busuttil A, Robertson R, et al. (2005) Hyperphosphorylated tau and amyloid precursor protein deposition is increased in the brains of young drug abusers. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 31: 439–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Frame S, Cohen P, Biondi RM (2001) A common phosphate binding site explains the unique substrate specificity of GSK3 and its inactivation by phosphorylation. Mol Cell 7: 1321–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Jacobs KM, Bhave SR, Ferraro DJ, Jaboin JJ, Hallahan DE, et al. (2012) GSK-3beta: A Bifunctional Role in Cell Death Pathways. Int J Cell Biol 2012: 930710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Grimes CA, Jope RS (2001) The multifaceted roles of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta in cellular signaling. Prog Neurobiol 65: 391–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Kaytor MD, Orr HT (2002) The GSK3 beta signaling cascade and neurodegenerative disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 275–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kumar R, Orsoni S, Norman L, Verma AS, Tirado G, et al. (2006) Chronic morphine exposure causes pronounced virus replication in cerebral compartment and accelerated onset of AIDS in SIV/SHIV-infected Indian rhesus macaques. Virology 354: 192–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Bokhari SM, Hegde R, Callen S, Yao H, Adany I, et al. (2011) Morphine potentiates neuropathogenesis of SIV infection in rhesus macaques. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 6: 626–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Reid W, Sadowska M, Denaro F, Rao S, Foulke J Jr, et al. (2001) An HIV-1 transgenic rat that develops HIV-related pathology and immunologic dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 9271–9276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Shacklett BL (2008) Can the new humanized mouse model give HIV research a boost. PLoS Med 5: e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Singh IN, El-Hage N, Campbell ME, Lutz SE, Knapp PE, et al. (2005) Differential involvement of p38 and JNK MAP kinases in HIV-1 Tat and gp120-induced apoptosis and neurite degeneration in striatal neurons. Neuroscience 135: 781–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Suzuki M, El-Hage N, Zou S, Hahn YK, Sorrell ME, et al. (2011) Fractalkine/CX3CL1 protects striatal neurons from synergistic morphine and HIV-1 Tat-induced dendritic losses and death. Mol Neurodegener 6: 78–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Arvidsson U, Riedl M, Chakrabarti S, Lee JH, Nakano AH, et al. (1995) Distribution and targeting of a mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) in brain and spinal cord. J Neurosci 15: 3328–3341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Berger JR, Nath A (1997) HIV dementia and the basal ganglia. Intervirology 40: 122–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Pang X, Panee J, Liu X, Berry MJ, Chang SL, et al. (2013) Regional Variations of Antioxidant Capacity and Oxidative Stress Responses in HIV-1 Transgenic Rats With and Without Methamphetamine Administration. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 8: 691–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Fitting S, Zou S, Chen W, Vo P, Hauser KF, et al. (2010) Regional heterogeneity and diversity in cytokine and chemokine production by astroglia: differential responses to HIV-1 Tat, gp120, and morphine revealed by multiplex analysis. J Proteome Res 9: 1795–1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Proudnikov D, Randesi M, Levran O, Crystal H, Dorn M, et al. (2012) Association of polymorphisms of the mu opioid receptor gene with the severity of HIV infection and response to HIV treatment. J Infect Dis 205: 1745–1756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. O'Brien SJ, Moore JP (2000) The effect of genetic variation in chemokines and their receptors on HIV transmission and progression to AIDS. Immunol Rev 177: 99–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Zimmerman PA, Buckler-White A, Alkhatib G, Spalding T, Kubofcik J, et al. (1997) Inherited resistance to HIV-1 conferred by an inactivating mutation in CC chemokine receptor 5: studies in populations with contrasting clinical phenotypes, defined racial background, and quantified risk. Mol Med 3: 23–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Gilman CP, Mattson MP (2002) Do apoptotic mechanisms regulate synaptic plasticity and growth-cone motility? Neuromolecular Med 2: 197–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Jones G, Zhu Y, Silva C, Tsutsui S, Pardo CA, et al. (2005) Peripheral nerve-derived HIV-1 is predominantly CCR5-dependent and causes neuronal degeneration and neuroinflammation. Virology 334: 178–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Ishiguro K, Shiratsuchi A, Sato S, Omori A, Arioka M, et al. (1993) Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta is identical to tau protein kinase I generating several epitopes of paired helical filaments. FEBS Lett 325: 167–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Liu SJ, Zhang AH, Li HL, Wang Q, Deng HM, et al. (2003) Overactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by inhibition of phosphoinositol-3 kinase and protein kinase C leads to hyperphosphorylation of tau and impairment of spatial memory. J Neurochem 87: 1333–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Mandelkow EM, Drewes G, Biernat J, Gustke N, Van Lint J, et al. (1992) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 and the Alzheimer-like state of microtubule-associated protein tau. FEBS Lett 314: 315–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Plyte SE, Hughes K, Nikolakaki E, Pulverer BJ, Woodgett JR (1992) Glycogen synthase kinase-3: functions in oncogenesis and development. Biochim Biophys Acta 1114: 147–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Hauser KF, El-Hage N, Stiene-Martin A, Maragos WF, Nath A, et al. (2007) HIV-1 neuropathogenesis: glial mechanisms revealed through substance abuse. J Neurochem 100: 567–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Chao CC, Hu S, Shark KB, Sheng WS, Gekker G, et al. (1997) Activation of mu opioid receptors inhibits microglial cell chemotaxis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281: 998–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Takayama N, Ueda H (2005) Morphine-induced chemotaxis and brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in microglia. J Neurosci 25: 430–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES