Pyridines are an extremely privileged heterocyclic class commonly found in natural products and functional materials. They are also important building blocks in both the agrochemical and pharmaceutical industries.1 Consequently, a vast array of synthetic methods has been successfully developed to access these useful molecules.2 Despite many recent advances, novel methods for the synthesis of highly functionalized pyridines in a selective and high yielding manner from accessible starting materials remains an important goal within the synthetic community.3
Following the demonstration by Romo and co-workers of generating ammonium enolates4 from carboxylic acids,5 we have shown that isothioureas6, 7 catalyze the intermolecular Michael addition/lactonization/lactamization of arylacetic acids and electron-deficient Michael acceptors.8 To expand this mode of activation, we questioned whether this methodology could be used to access functionalized pyridines. Conceptually, an isothiourea-catalyzed reaction of an acetic acid bearing an α-leaving group with a suitably electron-deficient α,β-unsaturated ketimine 19 would result in Michael addition/lactamization with subsequent elimination to form the pyridones 2 (Scheme 1).10 Subsequent N- to O-sulfonyl migration11 would allow the pyridines 3 to be accessed directly in one pot. Importantly, in this process the activating sulfonyl group on the ketimine would be transformed into a synthetically useful functional handle (the 2-sulfonate group) in the resultant pyridines, thus allowing subsequent derivatization into a variety of products.
Scheme 1.

Proposed strategy for functionalized pyridines. LB=Lewis base.
After initial screening,12 commercially available (phenylthio)acetic acid 4 was identified as a suitable acid in this process. Treatment of 4 with pivaloyl chloride and iPr2NEt gave the corresponding mixed anhydride in situ. Subsequent addition of the α,β-unsaturated ketimine 513 in the presence of the isothiourea DHPB (6; 20 mol %) in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C for 4 hours afforded the pyridine 7 in only 7 % yield after chromatographic purification,14 despite complete consumption of 5 (Table 1, entry 1). Optimization of this process showed that a combination of increased temperature and changing the solvent gave a higher yield of the isolated pyridine (entries 2–4). The increased temperatures are necessary to promote effective N- to O-sulfonyl migration in this process, with lower temperatures leading to mixtures of the intermediate pyridone and desired pyridine. The use of a microwave reactor led to good product yields (entry 5), and alternative reaction concentrations or catalysts (8–10) had a negative effect upon the yield of the isolated product (entries 6–10). Using 6 and extending the reaction time to 16 h in THF at 80 °C was determined to be the optimal reaction conditions, thus giving 7 in 67 % yield (entry 10).15
Table 1.
Reaction optimization
| Entry | Cat. | Solvent | T [°C] | t [h] | Yield [%][a] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | CH2Cl2 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| 2 | 6 | CH2Cl2 | RT | 4 | 30 |
| 3 | 6 | 1,4-dioxane | 80 | 16 | 52 |
| 4 | 6 | THF | 80 | 4 | 49 |
| 5 | 6 | THF | 80[b] | 2 | 52 |
| 6[c] | 6 | THF | 80 | 4 | 10 |
| 7 | 8 | THF | 80 | 4 | 13 |
| 8 | 9 | THF | 80 | 4 | – |
| 9 | 10 | THF | 80 | 4 | 36 |
| 10 | 6 | THF | 80 | 16 | 67 |
[a] Yield of isolated 7 following chromatography. [b] Biotage Initiator with a program of heating to 80 °C at maximum power of 150 W. [c] 0.0067 m in the ketimine 5 (typically 0.067 m). DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, DHPB=(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole), DMAP=4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine, TBD=1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene.
The generality of this process was next investigated (Table 2). Under optimized reaction conditions, this process tolerates a variety of α,β-unsaturated ketimines. The N-sulfonyl group (benzenesulfonyl and tosyl) can be altered, whilst a variety of different esters (methyl, ethyl, and benzyl) are also tolerated at the β position. Additionally, a range of aryl groups bearing electron-withdrawing (-NO2, -CN,-CF3), electron-donating (-OMe, -Me), and halogen (-F, -Cl) substituents are efficient substrates in this process, along with alkyl substitution. The functionalized trisubstituted pyridines 7 and 11–21 are formed in moderate to good yields following the three consecutive synthetic transformations in one pot.
Table 2.
Reaction scope.[a]
![]() |
[a] Yield is that of the product isolated after chromatography. Np=Naphthyl, Ts=p-toluenesulfonyl.
Given the wide interest in the preparation of functional heterocycles containing a trifluoromethyl unit, this protocol was extended to the synthesis of 4- and 6-trifluoromethyl-containing pyridines. Trifluoromethyl-containing α,β-unsaturated ketimines were readily prepared from the corresponding enones and used in this protocol, thus giving pyridines in acceptable yields (40–66 %; Table 3). Variation of the sulfonyl unit, as well as incorporation of heteroaryl (2-furyl and 2-thiophenyl) and aryl substituents was explored, with the incorporation of 3- and 4-bromosubstituted aromatics targeted to allow the possibility of derivatization by cross-coupling.16, 17 This pyridine-forming protocol is readily applicable to large-scale synthesis, thus forming the pyridine 22 on a 26 mmol scale using 6 (20 mol %) to generate 5.2 g of product (51 % yield). The pyridine 22 can also be accessed from the corresponding (Z)-ketimine under standard reaction conditions in 54 % yield. In addition, the isomeric pyridine 33 could be isolated in 40 % yield from the corresponding ketimine after heating for 48 h.18
Table 3.
Reaction scope using trifluoromethyl α,β-unsaturated ketimines.[a]
![]() |
[a] Yield is that of the product isolated after chromatography. [b] 48 h. Np=Naphthyl, Ts=p-toluenesulfonyl.
The proposed reaction mechanism proceeds by initial formation of the mixed anhydride 34 from 4 and pivaloyl chloride with subsequent N-acylation of DHPB to generate the corresponding acyl isothiouronium ion 35 (Figure 1). Deprotonation generates the (Z)-enolate 36, which undergoes Michael addition with the α,β-unsaturated ketimine 37 and subsequent intramolecular lactamization to generate the corresponding dihydropyridinone 38 and regenerate DHPB. Subsequent elimination of thiophenol gives the pyridone 39, which undergoes thermally promoted N- to O-sulfonyl migration to afford the pyridine 40.19
Figure 1.

Proposed reaction mechanism.
Within the literature, sporadic examples of the key N- to O-sulfonyl rearrangement utilized in this process have been observed, usually as an undesired nonproductive pathway in thermally promoted Diels–Alder reactions of sulfonyl pyridones.11 To understand this process further, a crossover experiment was performed to determine if the N- to O-sulfonyl migration process involves an intra- or intermolecular transfer (Scheme 2). Reaction of 4 (1 equiv) with a 50:50 mixture of the ketimines 41 and 42 under the optimized reaction conditions led exclusively to the pyridines 24 and 28, respectively, in a 50:50 mixture, and is consistent with intramolecular N- to O-sulfonyl transfer from an intermediate pyridone being involved within this process.
Scheme 2.

Crossover experiment to determine intra- or intermolecular N- to O-sulfonyl transfer.
The synthetic utility of the newly installed 2-sulfonate functional handle was next demonstrated through a series of product derivatizations to install H, aryl, heteroaryl, alkyl, and amino substituents (Scheme 3). For example, 22 can be reduced to give the 2,4-substituted pyridine 43 in 89 % yield,20 and it also readily undergoes SNAr with morpholine to give 44 in 85 % yield.21, 22 The pyridine substrates are compatible with traditional cross-coupling methodologies, thus leading to diverse 2,4,6-substituted pyridines. For example, 22 undergoes a Mizoroki–Heck reaction with N-vinylacetamide to afford the pyridine 45 in 76 % yield,23 Suzuki coupling to give 46 in 81 % yield,24, 25 and Kumada cross-coupling to give 47 in 66 % yield.26 In addition to sp2–sp2 coupling reactions, iron-catalyzed sp2–sp3 coupling of 22 with n-hexylmagnesium bromide gives 48 in 74 % yield.27, 28
Scheme 3.

Product derivatizations. a) HCO2H (3 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), dppp (5 mol %), Et3N (5 equiv) DMF, 60 °C, 1 h. b) morpholine (10 eq), Et3N (2 equiv), toluene, 110 °C, 16 h. c) N-vinylacetamide (4 equiv), [Pd(dba)2] (5 mol %), dppf (5 mol %), Cy2NMe (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane, 100 °C, 16 h. d) ArB(OH)2 (2 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol %), BrettPhos (2 mol %), K3PO4⋅H2O (3 equiv), toluene, 110 °C, 2 h. e) 4-MeOC6H4MgBr, (1.5 equiv), [Pd(dba)2] (2.5 mol %), PinP(O)H (5 mol %), 1,4-dioxane, 80 °C, 24 h. f) n-C6H13MgBr (1.5 equiv), FeCl3 (5 mol %), NMP (9 equiv), THF, −10 °C, 10 min. Boc=tert-butoxycarbonyl, Cy=cyclohexyl, dba=dibenzylideneacetone, dppp=1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane, NMP=N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, Pin=pinacol, THF=tetrahydrofuran.
Finally, the utility of this approach for the synthesis of medicinally relevant pyridine-containing molecules was illustrated. For example, the pyridine 50, which possesses activity as a COX-2 inhibitor (<0.5 mm activity, >100 fold selectivity for COX-2 versus COX-1)29 for the treatment of depressive disorders, can be made in 49 % yield over two synthetic steps from the α,β-unsaturated ketimine 49 (14 % overall yield from commercially available starting materials, Scheme 4).
Scheme 4.

Rapid assembly of the biologically active pyridine 50.
In conclusion, we have developed an isothiourea-catalyzed, one-pot synthesis of 2,4,6-substituted pyridines bearing a readily derivatized 2-sulfonate functionality from (phenylthio)acetic acid and range of α,β-unsaturated ketimines. This process proceeds by intermolecular Michael addition/lactamization, thiophenyl elimination, and N- to O-sulfonyl migration, wherein the N-sulfonyl activating group within the α,β-unsaturated ketimine is transformed into a valuable 2-sulfonate functional handle in the resulting pyridine. Functionalization of this group allows the rapid assembly of both novel and biologically relevant pyridines. Current research from this laboratory is directed towards developing new applications of isothioureas in catalysis.
Supplementary material
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
References
- 1a.Roughley SD, Jordan AM. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:3451. doi: 10.1021/jm200187y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1b.Carey JS, Laffan D, Thomson C, Williams MT. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:2337. doi: 10.1039/b602413k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2a.Varela JA, Saa C. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:3787. doi: 10.1021/cr030677f. For reviews, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2b.Henry GD. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:6043. [Google Scholar]
- 2c.Zeni G, Larock RC. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:4664. doi: 10.1021/cr0683966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2d.Ciufolini MA, Chan BK. Heterocycles. 2007;74:101. [Google Scholar]
- 2e.Heller B, Hapke M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:1085. doi: 10.1039/b607877j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2f.Bagley MC, Glover C, Merrit EA. Synlett. 2007:1085. [Google Scholar]
- 2g.Groenendaal B, Ruijter E, Orru RVA. Chem. Commun. 2008:5474. doi: 10.1039/b809206k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2h.Hill MD. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:12052. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3a.Donohoe TJ, Fishlock LP, Procopiou PA. Org. Lett. 2008;10:285. doi: 10.1021/ol702684d. For selected recent methods to access substituted pyridines, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3b.Nakamura I, Zhang D, Terada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:7884. doi: 10.1021/ja102436z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3c.Ohashi M, Takeda I, Ikawa M, Ogoshi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:18018. doi: 10.1021/ja208162w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3d.Wang C, Li X, Wu F, Wan B. Angew. Chem. 2011;123:7300. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:7162. [Google Scholar]
- 3e.Yamamoto S, Okamoto K, Murakoso M, Kuninobu Y, Takai K. Org. Lett. 2012;14:3182. doi: 10.1021/ol301273j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3f.Gati W, Rammah MM, Rammah MB, Couty F, Evano G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:9078. doi: 10.1021/ja303002a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3g.Wei Y, Yoshikai N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:3756. doi: 10.1021/ja312346s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3h.Lei C-H, Wang D-X, Zhao L, Zhu J, Wang M-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:4708. doi: 10.1021/ja401701x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3i.Neely JM, Rovis T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:66. doi: 10.1021/ja3104389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3j.Shi Z, Loh T-P. Angew. Chem. 2013;125:8746. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:8584. [Google Scholar]
- 3k.Kim KH, Kim SH, Lee HJ, Kim JN. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013;355:1977. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gaunt MJ, Johansson CCC. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:5596. doi: 10.1021/cr0683764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5a.Cortez GS, Tennyson RL, Romo D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:7945. doi: 10.1021/ja016134+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5b.Cortez GS, Oh SH, Romo D. Synthesis. 2001:1731. [Google Scholar]
- 5c.Oh SH, Cortez GS, Romo D. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:2835. doi: 10.1021/jo050024u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5d.Henry-Riyad H, Lee C, Purohit VC, Romo D. Org. Lett. 2006;8:4363. doi: 10.1021/ol061816t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5e.Ma G, Nguyen H, Romo D. Org. Lett. 2007;9:2143. doi: 10.1021/ol070616u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5f.Purohit VC, Matla AS, Romo D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:10478. doi: 10.1021/ja803579z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5g.Nguyen H, Ma G, Romo D. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:4803. doi: 10.1039/c0cc00607f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5h.Morris KA, Arendt KM, Oh SH, Romo D. Org. Lett. 2010;12:3764. doi: 10.1021/ol101388h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5i.Leverett C, Purohit VC, Romo D. Angew. Chem. 2010;122:9669. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:9479. [Google Scholar]
- 5j.Nguyen H, Ma G, Gladysheva T, Fremgen T, Romo D. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:2. doi: 10.1021/jo101638r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5k.Liu G, Romo D. Angew. Chem. 2011;123:7679. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:7537. [Google Scholar]
- 5l.Liu G, Shirley ME, Romo D. J. Org. Chem. 2012;77:2496. doi: 10.1021/jo202252y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6a.Taylor JE, Bull SD, Williams JMJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:2109. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15288f. For a recent review detailing the use of isothioureas in nucleophilic catalysis, see: For selected work using isothioureas from this laboratory, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6b.Joannesse C, Johnston CP, Concellón C, Simal C, Philp D, Smith AD. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:9076. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:8914. [Google Scholar]
- 6c.Woods PA, Morrill LC, Bragg RA, Smith AD. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:11060. doi: 10.1002/chem.201100995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6d.Robinson ERT, Fallan C, Simal C, Slawin AMZ, Smith AD. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:2193. [Google Scholar]
- 7a.Birman VB, Jiang H, Li X, Geo V, Uffman EW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:6536. doi: 10.1021/ja061560m. For pioneering work, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7b.Kobayashi M, Okamoto S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:4347. [Google Scholar]
- 8a.Belmessieri D, Morrill LC, Simal C, Slawin AMZ, Smith AD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:2710. doi: 10.1021/ja109975c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8b.Morrill LC, Lebl T, Slawin AMZ, Smith AD. Chem. Sci. 2012;3:2088. [Google Scholar]
- 8c.Simal C, Lebl T, Slawin AMZ, Smith AD. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:3713. doi: 10.1002/anie.201109061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:3653. [Google Scholar]
- 8d.Morrill LC, Lebl T, Slawin AMZ, Smith AD. Chem. Sci. 2013 DOI: 10.1039/C3SC51791H. For an intramolecular approach to pyrrolidines, see: [Google Scholar]
- Belmessieri D, Cordes DB, Slawin AMZ, Smith AD. Org. Lett. 2013;15:3472. doi: 10.1021/ol401554y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. During the preparation of this manuscript, Loh and co-workers published an alternative approach to pyridines using ketimines (1 equiv) and allenoates (2 equiv) as starting materials (Ref [3j])
- 10a.Nishimura T, Unni AK, Yokoshima S, Fukuyama T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:418. doi: 10.1021/ja109516f. For a process involving elimination of a sulfoxide to generate pyridones, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10b.Fujii M, Nishimura T, Koshiba T, Yokoshima S, Fukuyama T. Org. Lett. 2013;15:232. doi: 10.1021/ol303320c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11a.Hamer M, Lira EP. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1972;9:215. For examples of this rearrangement, usually considered to be an undersired, nonproductive pathway, see: [Google Scholar]
- 11b.Abramovitch RA, Knaus GN. J. Org. Chem. 1975;40:883. [Google Scholar]
- 11c.Posner GH, Switzer C. J. Org. Chem. 1987;52:1642. [Google Scholar]
- 11d.Posner GH, Vinader V, Afarinkia K. J. Org. Chem. 1992;57:4088. [Google Scholar]
- 11e.Afarinkia K, Mahmood F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:493. [Google Scholar]
- 11f.Fujita R, Watanabe K, Ikeura W, Ohtake Y, Hongo H. Heterocycles. 2000;53:2607. [Google Scholar]
- 11g.Fujita R, Watanabe K, Ikeura W, Ohtake Y, Hongo H, Harigaya Y, Matsuzaki H. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:8841. [Google Scholar]
- 11h.Hiroya K, Jouka R, Katoh O, Sakuma T, Anzai M, Sakamoto T. Arkivoc. 2003:232. [Google Scholar]
- 11i.Hodgson R, Kennedy A, Nelson A, Perry A. Synlett. 2007:1043. [Google Scholar]
- 11j.Teyssot M-L, Lormier A-T, Chataigner I, Piettre SR. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:2364. doi: 10.1021/jo062186b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11k.Kipassa NT, Okamura H, Kina K, Hamada T, Iwagawa T. Org. Lett. 2008;10:815. doi: 10.1021/ol7029646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11l.Chou S-SP, Wang H-C, Chen P-W, Yang C-H. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:5291. For a related transformation, see: [Google Scholar]
- Kimura M, Horino Y, Mori M, Tamura Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;13:9686. doi: 10.1002/chem.200700691. After acceptance of this manuscript a recent application of this process was disclosed: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mertens MD, Pietsch M, Schakenburg G, Gütschow M. J. Org. Chem. 2013. DOI: 10.1021/jo4010876. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12. Initially, bromo- and chloroacetic acid were tested in this protocol although neither resulted in any conversion into the pyridine 7.
- 13. All ketimines were prepared in three steps from commercially available starting materials by established literature methods. See the Supporting Information for full details.
- 14. The structure of 7 was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystal structure analysis. CCDC 953451 (7) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
- 15. All pyridine-forming reactions using commercially available (phenylthio)acetic acid (4) were carried out using bench-grade solvents under air as standard.
- 16.Johansson Seechurn CCC, Kitching MO, Colacot TJ, Snieckus V. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:5150. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107017. For a general review on palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:5062. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ren H, Knochel P. Chem. Commun. 2006:726. doi: 10.1039/b515168f. For an example of selective cross-coupling of an arylbromide in the presence of a 2-sulfonate group, see: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. A selection of other N-sulfonyl ketimines including α- and α,β-substituted derivatives were tested in this protocol and did not afford the desired pyridine products, but instead led to isolable dihydropyridinones or pyridones. See the Supporting Information for details.
- 19. At the moment we cannot unambiguously distinguish between the N-acylation/deprotonation mechanism to generate 36 as depicted in Figure 1 and the alternative process which proceeds by ketene formation and addition of DHPB.
- 20.Yoshida Y, Mohri K, Isobe K, Itoh T, Yamamoto K. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:6010. doi: 10.1021/jo9008645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Volochnyuk DM, Pushechnikov AO, Krotko DG, Sibgatulin DA, Kovalyova SA, Tolmachev AA. Synthesis. 2003:1531. [Google Scholar]
- 22. An alternative SN Ar with cyclohexylamine proceeded in 79 % yield. See the Supporting Information for full details.
- 23.Gøgsig TM, Lindhardt AT, Dekhane M, Grouleff J, Skrydstrup T. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:5950. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bhayana B, Fors BP, Buchwald SL. Org. Lett. 2009;11:3954. doi: 10.1021/ol9015892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. An alternative Suzuki coupling with 3-furanylboronic acid proceeded in 70 % yield. See the Supporting Information for full details.
- 26a.Ackermann L, Althammer A. Org. Lett. 2006;8:3457. doi: 10.1021/ol061116o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26b.Ackermann L, Kapdi AR, Fenner S, Kornhaaß C, Schulzke C. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:2965. doi: 10.1002/chem.201002386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gøgsig TM, Lindhardt AT, Skrydstrup T. Org. Lett. 2009;11:4886. doi: 10.1021/ol901975u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. The 2-sulfonate group in 7 can also be hydrolyzed by treatment with nBu4NOH to afford a pyridone in 89 % yield. See the Supporting Informationfor full details.
- 29a.Beswick P, Modi S, Pegg N, Skidmore J, Swarbrick M. 2004. WO 2004/024691.
- 29b.Hagan JJ, Ratti E, Routledge C. 2005. WO 2005/048999.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


