Abstract

The reaction of a manganese(V)–oxo porphyrinoid complex with the Lewis acid B(C6F5)3 leads to reversible stabilization of the valence tautomer MnIV(O)(π-radical cation). The latter complex, in combination with B(C6F5)3, reacts with ArO–H substrates via formal hydrogen-atom transfer and exhibits dramatically increased reaction rates over the MnV(O) starting material.
Short abstract
The addition of the nonmetal Lewis acid B(C6F5)3 to a low-spin manganese(V)−oxo corrolazine (Cz) stabilizes the valence tautomer MnIV(O)(Cz•+). Cryospray mass spectrometry, together with other data, supports formation of the 1:1 complex MnIV(O)(Cz•+):B(C6F5)3. The rates of hydrogen-atom abstraction from O−H bonds are significantly enhanced for the latter species. This work provides insight regarding the influence of both the electronic structure and Lewis acids on the reactivity of high-valent metal−oxo complexes.
High-valent metal–oxo species are invoked as key players in both biological and synthetic oxidations. Examples include an FeIV(O) porphyrin π-radical cation, the key intermediate in cytochrome P450,1 and postulated MnIV/MnV(O) intermediates in photosynthetic water oxidation.2 In heme systems such as P450, there are two possible valence tautomers, FeV(O)(p) or FeIV(O)(p•+), and the redox-active nature of the porphyrin ligand plays a critical role in stabilizing the latter. The synthesis of analogous transition-metal complexes with redox-active ligands that enhance reactivity has been targeted for multielectron catalysis.3 The design of complexes that can undergo controlled valence tautomerism is also important for molecular device applications.4
Previously, we introduced a new method for controlling valence tautomerism in a MnV(O) porphyrinoid complex.5 The addition of the Lewis acidic ZnII ion was shown to convert MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) to the valence tautomer MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+). The influence of Lewis acids on the reactivity of biologically relevant high-valent metal–oxo species is of intense current interest,6 especially because of the Ca2+ ion involved in manganese-mediated water oxidation.2 Herein, we show for the first time that a nonmetal ion Lewis acid, B(C6F5)3, can induce valence tautomerism in a high-valent metal–oxo complex. We find that the addition of B(C6F5)3 also causes dramatically enhanced hydrogen-atom abstraction reactivity toward phenol substrates.
The reaction of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) with 1 equiv of B(C6F5)3 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature (Scheme 1) was monitored by UV–vis spectroscopy. An immediate color change from the green solution for MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) to a red-brown solution was observed together with the disappearance of the spectrum for MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (λmax = 420 and 634 nm) and the appearance of new peaks at λmax = 420 and 789 nm (Figure 1). The broadening and decrease in the intensity of the Soret band at 420 nm together with the formation of a relatively weak band in the near-IR region at 789 nm is characteristic of the formation of a porphyrinoid π-radical cation.5
Scheme 1. Formation of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+).

Figure 1.

(a) Spectral titration of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (5 μM) + B(C6F5)3 (0.1–1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2. (b) CSIMS(+) of [Mn(O)(TBP8Cz):B(C6F5)3 + H]+ at −50 °C.
The new spectrum matches that observed previously upon the addition of the Lewis acid ZnII(OTf)2 to the MnV(O) complex, which was shown to convert the low-spin (S = 0) MnV complex into a high-spin triplet (S = 1) (or possibly quintet S = 2) state with an electronic configuration best described as a manganese(IV) corrolazine π-radical cation.5 UV–vis spectral titrations were performed with B(C6F5)3, and tight isosbestic behavior was seen throughout the titration (Figure 1a). A plot of the absorbance at 789 nm versus [B(C6F5)3] (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information, SI) reaches a plateau at ∼1 equiv of B(C6F5)3, and no further spectral changes are seen with the addition of more B(C6F5)3. Assuming that triarylborane reversibly binds to the MnV(O) complex under equilibrium conditions, a good fit of the data can be obtained with a model for a one-to-one binding isotherm. This fit gives an association constant (Ka) of 2.0 × 107 M–1, close to that measured for Zn2+ [Ka(Zn2+) = 4.0 × 106 M–1].5
The 1H NMR spectrum of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) + B(C6F5)3 (1:1 molar ratio) in CDCl3 reveals paramagnetically shifted and broadened peaks, as opposed to the sharp, diamagnetic spectrum seen for low-spin MnV(O)(TBP8Cz). The paramagnetic NMR spectrum is consistent with the formation of a MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) complex, in which a high-spin (S = 3/2) MnIV ion is either ferromagnetically (S = 2) or antiferromagnetically (S = 1) coupled to the corrolazine π- radical cation (S = 1/2). An Evans method measurement in CDCl3 gives μeff = 4.19 μB, which falls between the predicted spin-only values of 2.83 and 4.90 μB for the triplet and quintet spin states, respectively. The X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) in CH2Cl2 at 12 K showed only relatively weak EPR-active impurities, consistent with the main product having an integer spin (S = 1 or 2). The UV–vis, NMR, and EPR data all support the conclusion that the nonmetallic Lewis acid B(C6F5)3 stabilizes the open-shell valence tautomer MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+).
Attempts to isolate the 1:1 complex MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+):B(C6F5)3 in the solid state led to significant reduction, giving a MnIII(TBP8Cz) product. However, it was possible to characterize the B(C6F5)3 complex in solution by cryospray ionization mass spectrometry (CSIMS). The reaction of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) + B(C6F5)3 (1 equiv) in CH2Cl2 at 20 °C was monitored by UV–vis to ensure good conversion to MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) and then analyzed directly by CSIMS (Figure 1b). A cluster centered at m/z 1939.7619 is observed, and the high-resolution, isotopic distribution pattern matches well for the complex of formula [Mn(O)(TBP8Cz):B(C6F5)3 + H]+. The cluster observed at m/z 1426.7712 corresponds to [Mn(O)(TBP8Cz)]+, which likely results from fragmentation of the B(C6F5)3 complex (Figure S4 in the SI). These data provide strong evidence for the formation of a 1:1 complex between the manganese–oxo corrolazine and the Lewis acidic triarylborane.
Athough we have yet to obtain direct structural information for the ZnII- or borane-derived complexes, B(C6F5)3 is anticipated to bind to the oxo ligand of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+). Precedent for this conclusion can be seen in the X-ray structure of an isoelectronic ReV(O)(B(C6F5)3) complex, in which the boron atom is bound directly to the terminal oxo ligand.7 In addition, it was proposed that Sc3+ coordinates directly to the oxo group of nonheme MnIV(O) complexes based on X-ray absorption spectroscopy and other supporting data.6b,6c
The reversibility of the formation of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) was examined with the addition of fluoride anion. Triarylboranes are known to readily form fluoroborate products ([FB(Ar)3]−) upon the addition of F–.8a The reagent [((CH3)2N)3S]+[F2Si(CH3)3]− (TASF) was employed as a soluble, anhydrous fluoride source. The addition of TASF to a freshly prepared solution of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+):B(C6F5)3 led to rapid recovery of the starting low-spin MnV(O) complex, as seen by UV–vis (λmax = 634 nm; Figure S2 in the SI), together with a small amount of the reduced MnIII complex [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]−.9a The addition of excess chloride anion (Bu4NCl), in contrast, produced no observable change by UV–vis. The difference in the reactivity of F– versus Cl– parallels their independent reactivity toward triarylboranes, in which Cl– binds only weakly to B(Ar)3.8b
The reactivity of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+):B(C6F5)3 in hydrogen-atom-transfer (HAT) reactions was examined with phenol substrates. The reaction with 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (2,4-DTBP) was monitored by UV–vis (Figure 2). Isosbestic conversion to a final spectrum with λmax = 443 and 727 nm was observed and is similar to that seen for [MnIV(TBP8Cz)]+.9b EPR spectroscopy gives a well-resolved spectrum with g ∼ 4 and 2 and a hyperfine splitting consistent with 55Mn (I = 5/2; Figure 2b). The spectrum was satisfactorily simulated with a fictitious spin of S′ = 1/2, and g = [4.61, 4.20, 1.92]; Aiso(55Mn) = [82, 86, 50] G. These parameters are within the range of previously reported high-spin manganese(IV) corrolazines (S = 3/2) and other hs manganese(IV) porphyrinoid complexes.9b These data indicate that the reaction with 2,4-DTBP results in a one-electron reduction of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+), consistent with hydrogen-atom abstraction from the O–H bond.
Figure 2.

(a) UV–vis spectral changes (0–60 s) for MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+):B(C6F5)3 + 2,4-DTBP (300 equiv) at 25 °C. (b) EPR spectrum (12 K) after reaction with 2,4-DTBP: exptl, black line; simulation, red line.
The product of oxidation of 2,4-DTBP was identified by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection as the expected bisphenol dimer (eq 1). A maximal yield of 0.5 equiv of dimer per manganese complex is predicted if the manganese complex serves as a one-electron oxidant, and a yield of 0.39 equiv based on manganese was obtained. This result further supports the MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) complex functioning as a one-electron oxidant, in stark contrast to the reactivity seen for the low-spin MnV(O) complex, which acts as a two-electron oxidant toward phenol and C–H substrates.9
![]() |
1 |
The kinetics for phenol substrates were measured to gain insight into the reactivity of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+):B(C6F5)3. Reactions with excess 2,4-DTBP were monitored by UV–vis and found to be first-order over 5 half-lives (Figure S10 in the SI). A plot of [2,4-DTBP] versus kobs was linear, consistent with the rate law rate = k2[Mn(O)][ArOH]. These methods yielded second-order rate constants, k2, for both B(C6F5)3 and ZnII, as well as the more sterically hindered 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenol (2,4,6-TTBP), and are compared in Table 1. The generation of MnIV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) by either ZnII or B(C6F5)3 leads to a significant increase (up to 130-fold) in reactivity compared to the starting low-spin MnV(O) complex for both phenol substrates. The identity of the Lewis acid further influences the reaction rates, with triarylborane being more reactive in both cases. In addition, the much slower rate constants for the more sterically hindered 2,4,6-TTBP indicate a mechanism involving HAT. Support for this mechanism was obtained by measuring a kinetic isotope effect of 3.2 ± 0.3 for 2,4,6-TTBP-OD (Figure S11 in the SI).10 It was reported that the addition of Sc3+ to a nonheme MnIV(O) complex caused a decrease in HAT rates, attributed to steric hindrance from the Sc3+ ion.6b Our results appear to contrast these findings, with Lewis acids strongly increasing the HAT reactivity of a MnIV(O)(Cz•+) complex. However, this comparison is complicated by the fact that the inherent HAT reactivity of the valence tautomer with the electronic structure MnIV(O)(Cz•+) is not known. The influence of the electronic structure on the reactivity of high-valent metal–oxo complexes remains an area of intense debate.11
Table 1. Rate Constants for Oxidation of Phenol Substrates.
| substrate | Lewis acid | k2 (M–1 s–1) | kacid/knone |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-DTPB | Zn2+ | 17 ± 1 | 5.9 |
| B(C6F5)3 | 107 ± 8 | 37 | |
| none | 2.9 ± 0.1 | ||
| 2,4,6-TTBP | Zn2+ | 0.157 ± 0.008 | 2.1 |
| B(C6F5)3 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 130 | |
| none | 0.074 ± 0.007 |
In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that a nonmetal ion Lewis acid can induce reversible valence tautomerism in a metalloporphyrinoid compound. We have also shown that the HAT reactivity of a MnIV(O)(porphyrinoid•+) complex in the presence of Lewis acids is strongly enhanced compared to its closed-shell MnV(O) valence tautomer. This work provides new insight regarding how to control valence tautomerism in porphyrinoid compounds, as well as on how Lewis acids influence the reactivity of high-valent metal–oxo species.
Acknowledgments
We thank the NIH (Grant GM101153 to D.P.G.) for financial support. R.A.B. is grateful for an E2SHI Fellowship. I.I.-B. and M.D. acknowledge support from the “Solar Technologies Go Hybrid” initiative of the State of Bavaria.
Supporting Information Available
Experimental procedures, kinetic studies, and EPR and MS data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Funding Statement
National Institutes of Health, United States
Supplementary Material
References
- a Groves J. T.; Han Y. In Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism and Biochemistry, 2nd ed.; Ortiz de Montellano P. R., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1995. [Google Scholar]; b Denisov I. G.; Makris T. M.; Sligar S. G.; Schlichting I. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Rittle J.; Green M. T. Science 2010, 330, 933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Poulos T. L. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 3919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Green M. T.; Dawson J. H.; Gray H. B. Science 2004, 304, 1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a McEvoy J. P.; Brudvig G. W. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Siegbahn P. E. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Britt R. D. In Oxygenic Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions; Ort D., Yocum C., Heichel I., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996; Vol. 4, p 137. [Google Scholar]; d Umena Y.; Kawakami K.; Shen J.-R.; Kamiya N. Nature 2011, 473, 55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Chirik P. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 9737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Praneeth V. K. K.; Ringenberg M. R.; Ward T. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Luca O. R.; Crabtree R. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Lyons C. T.; Stack T. D. P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Kurahashi T.; Kikuchi A.; Tosha T.; Shiro Y.; Kitagawa T.; Fujii H. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Weiss R.; Bulach V.; Gold A.; Terner J.; Trautwein A. X. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 6, 831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Evangelio E.; Ruiz-Molina D. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 2005, 2957. [Google Scholar]
- Leeladee P.; Baglia R. A.; Prokop K. A.; Latifi R.; de Visser S. P.; Goldberg D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Tsui E. Y.; Kanady J. S.; Agapie T. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 13833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Chen J.; Lee Y.-M.; Davis K. M.; Wu X.; Seo M. S.; Cho K.-B.; Yoon H.; Park Y. J.; Fukuzumi S.; Pushkar Y. N.; Nam W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yoon H.; Lee Y.-M.; Wu X.; Cho K.-B.; Sarangi R.; Nam W.; Fukuzumi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Park Y. J.; Ziller J. W.; Borovik A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Lam W. W. Y.; Yiu S.-M.; Lee J. M. N.; Yau S. K. Y.; Kwong H.-K.; Lau T.-C.; Liu D.; Lin Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Dong L.; Wang Y.; Lv Y.; Chen Z.; Mei F.; Xiong H.; Yin G. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 5418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Mukherjee S.; Stull J. A.; Yano J.; Stamatatos T. C.; Pringouri K.; Stich T. A.; Abboud K. A.; Britt R. D.; Yachandra V. K.; Christou G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109, 2257–2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smeltz J. L.; Lilly C. P.; Boyle P. D.; Ison E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Wade C. R.; Broomsgrove A. E. J.; Aldridge S.; Gabbai F. P. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Zhao H.; Reibenspies J. H.; Gabbai F. P. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Prokop K. A.; de Visser S. P.; Goldberg D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Fukuzumi S.; Kotani H.; Prokop K. A.; Goldberg D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Lansky D. E.; Goldberg D. P. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 5119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- An electron transfer/proton transfer or proton transfer/electron transfer mechanism cannot be definitively ruled out.
- a Saouma C. T.; Mayer J. M. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sahu S.; Widger L. R.; Quesne M. G.; de Visser S. P.; Matsumura H.; Moënne-Loccoz P.; Siegler M. A.; Goldberg D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Usharani D.; Janardanan D.; Li C.; Shaik S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 46, 471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

