Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Nov 7;92(23):10683–10687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10683

The activation domain of GAL4 protein mediates cooperative promoter binding with general transcription factors in vivo.

S Vashee 1, T Kodadek 1
PMCID: PMC40676  PMID: 7479865

Abstract

Most proteins that activate RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription in eukaryotic cells contain sequence-specific DNA-binding domains and "activation" regions. The latter bind general transcription factors and/or coactivators and are required for high-level transcription. Their function in vivo is unknown. Since several activation domains bind the TATA-binding protein (TBP), TBP-associated factors, or other general factors in vitro, one role of the activation domain may be to facilitate promoter occupancy by supporting cooperative binding of the activator and general transcription factors. Using the GAL4 system of yeast, we have tested this model in vivo. It is demonstrated that the presence of a TATA box (the TBP binding site) facilitates binding of GAL4 protein to low- and moderate-affinity sites and that the activation domain modulates these effects. These results support the cooperative binding model for activation domain function in vivo.

Full text

PDF
10683

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almer A., Hörz W. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2681–2687. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aso T., Conaway J. W., Conaway R. C. Role of core promoter structure in assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex. A common pathway for formation of preinitiation intermediates at many TATA and TATA-less promoters. J Biol Chem. 1994 Oct 21;269(42):26575–26583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrod J. D., Reagan M. S., Majors J. GAL4 disrupts a repressing nucleosome during activation of GAL1 transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):857–869. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baniahmad A., Ha I., Reinberg D., Tsai S., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Interaction of human thyroid hormone receptor beta with transcription factor TFIIB may mediate target gene derepression and activation by thyroid hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8832–8836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyer T. G., Berk A. J. Functional interaction of adenovirus E1A with holo-TFIID. Genes Dev. 1993 Sep;7(9):1810–1823. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carey M., Kakidani H., Leatherwood J., Mostashari F., Ptashne M. An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer. J Mol Biol. 1989 Oct 5;209(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavalli G., Thoma F. Chromatin transitions during activation and repression of galactose-regulated genes in yeast. EMBO J. 1993 Dec;12(12):4603–4613. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen J. L., Attardi L. D., Verrijzer C. P., Yokomori K., Tjian R. Assembly of recombinant TFIID reveals differential coactivator requirements for distinct transcriptional activators. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):93–105. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90403-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen J., Ding M., Pederson D. S. Binding of TFIID to the CYC1 TATA boxes in yeast occurs independently of upstream activating sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 6;91(25):11909–11913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.11909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen X., Farmer G., Zhu H., Prywes R., Prives C. Cooperative DNA binding of p53 with TFIID (TBP): a possible mechanism for transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):1837–1849. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dynlacht B. D., Hoey T., Tjian R. Isolation of coactivators associated with the TATA-binding protein that mediate transcriptional activation. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):563–576. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedor M. J., Kornberg R. D. Upstream activation sequence-dependent alteration of chromatin structure and transcription activation of the yeast GAL1-GAL10 genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;9(4):1721–1732. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.4.1721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fedor M. J., Lue N. F., Kornberg R. D. Statistical positioning of nucleosomes by specific protein-binding to an upstream activating sequence in yeast. J Mol Biol. 1988 Nov 5;204(1):109–127. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90603-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geisberg J. V., Lee W. S., Berk A. J., Ricciardi R. P. The zinc finger region of the adenovirus E1A transactivating domain complexes with the TATA box binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2488–2492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giardina C., Pérez-Riba M., Lis J. T. Promoter melting and TFIID complexes on Drosophila genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2190–2200. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilmour D. S., Lis J. T. RNA polymerase II interacts with the promoter region of the noninduced hsp70 gene in Drosophila melanogaster cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3984–3989. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Giniger E., Ptashne M. Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):382–386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.2.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gross D. S., Adams C. C., Lee S., Stentz B. A critical role for heat shock transcription factor in establishing a nucleosome-free region over the TATA-initiation site of the yeast HSP82 heat shock gene. EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3931–3945. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06071.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill J. E., Myers A. M., Koerner T. J., Tzagoloff A. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast. 1986 Sep;2(3):163–167. doi: 10.1002/yea.320020304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ingles C. J., Shales M., Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J., Greenblatt J. Reduced binding of TFIID to transcriptionally compromised mutants of VP16. Nature. 1991 Jun 13;351(6327):588–590. doi: 10.1038/351588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnston M. A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1987 Dec;51(4):458–476. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.4.458-476.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston S. A., Hopper J. E. Isolation of the yeast regulatory gene GAL4 and analysis of its dosage effects on the galactose/melibiose regulon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Nov;79(22):6971–6975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.22.6971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnston S. A., Salmeron J. M., Jr, Dincher S. S. Interaction of positive and negative regulatory proteins in the galactose regulon of yeast. Cell. 1987 Jul 3;50(1):143–146. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90671-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim T. K., Roeder R. G. Proline-rich activator CTF1 targets the TFIIB assembly step during transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 10;91(10):4170–4174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim Y. J., Björklund S., Li Y., Sayre M. H., Kornberg R. D. A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):599–608. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein C., Struhl K. Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo. Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):280–282. doi: 10.1126/science.7939664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koleske A. J., Young R. A. An RNA polymerase II holoenzyme responsive to activators. Nature. 1994 Mar 31;368(6470):466–469. doi: 10.1038/368466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lazarides E., Lindberg U. Actin is the naturally occurring inhibitor of deoxyribonuclease I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Dec;71(12):4742–4746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.12.4742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee W. S., Kao C. C., Bryant G. O., Liu X., Berk A. J. Adenovirus E1A activation domain binds the basic repeat in the TATA box transcription factor. Cell. 1991 Oct 18;67(2):365–376. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90188-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lieberman P. M., Berk A. J. A mechanism for TAFs in transcriptional activation: activation domain enhancement of TFIID-TFIIA--promoter DNA complex formation. Genes Dev. 1994 May 1;8(9):995–1006. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.9.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lieberman P. M., Berk A. J. The Zta trans-activator protein stabilizes TFIID association with promoter DNA by direct protein-protein interaction. Genes Dev. 1991 Dec;5(12B):2441–2454. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin Y. S., Green M. R. Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):971–981. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90321-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lohr D., Hopper J. E. The relationship of regulatory proteins and DNase I hypersensitive sites in the yeast GAL1-10 genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Dec 9;13(23):8409–8423. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.23.8409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lohr D., Torchia T., Hopper J. The regulatory protein GAL80 is a determinant of the chromatin structure of the yeast GAL1-10 control region. J Biol Chem. 1987 Nov 15;262(32):15589–15597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ma J., Ptashne M. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell. 1987 Mar 13;48(5):847–853. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Melcher K., Johnston S. A. GAL4 interacts with TATA-binding protein and coactivators. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 May;15(5):2839–2848. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.5.2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Philippsen P., Stotz A., Scherf C. DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:169–182. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):683–689. doi: 10.1038/335683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rainbow M., Lopez J., Lohr D. The yeast GAL1-10 UAS region readily accepts nucleosomes in vitro. Biochemistry. 1989 Sep 5;28(18):7486–7490. doi: 10.1021/bi00444a048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Salmeron J. M., Jr, Langdon S. D., Johnston S. A. Interaction between transcriptional activator protein LAC9 and negative regulatory protein GAL80. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;9(7):2950–2956. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.7.2950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmid A., Fascher K. D., Hörz W. Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):853–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90560-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stringer K. F., Ingles C. J., Greenblatt J. Direct and selective binding of an acidic transcriptional activation domain to the TATA-box factor TFIID. Nature. 1990 Jun 28;345(6278):783–786. doi: 10.1038/345783a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Swaffield J. C., Bromberg J. F., Johnston S. A. Alterations in a yeast protein resembling HIV Tat-binding protein relieve requirement for an acidic activation domain in GAL4. Nature. 1992 Jun 25;357(6380):698–700. doi: 10.1038/357698a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Swaffield J. C., Melcher K., Johnston S. A. A highly conserved ATPase protein as a mediator between acidic activation domains and the TATA-binding protein. Nature. 1995 Mar 2;374(6517):88–91. doi: 10.1038/374088a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Thut C. J., Chen J. L., Klemm R., Tjian R. p53 transcriptional activation mediated by coactivators TAFII40 and TAFII60. Science. 1995 Jan 6;267(5194):100–104. doi: 10.1126/science.7809597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Triezenberg S. J., Kingsbury R. C., McKnight S. L. Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression. Genes Dev. 1988 Jun;2(6):718–729. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.6.718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Truant R., Xiao H., Ingles C. J., Greenblatt J. Direct interaction between the transcriptional activation domain of human p53 and the TATA box-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 5;268(4):2284–2287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vashee S., Xu H., Johnston S. A., Kodadek T. How do "Zn2 cys6" proteins distinguish between similar upstream activation sites? Comparison of the DNA-binding specificity of the GAL4 protein in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 25;268(33):24699–24706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Workman J. L., Buchman A. R. Multiple functions of nucleosomes and regulatory factors in transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Mar;18(3):90–95. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90160-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu H. E., Kodadek T., Johnston S. A. A single GAL4 dimer can maximally activate transcription under physiological conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 15;92(17):7677–7680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES