Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2014 Jun;58(6):3461–3467. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02728-13

Killing of Mycobacterium avium by Lactoferricin Peptides: Improved Activity of Arginine- and d-Amino-Acid-Containing Molecules

Tânia Silva a,b,c, Bárbara Magalhães a, Sílvia Maia b, Paula Gomes b, Kamran Nazmi d, Jan G M Bolscher d, Pedro N Rodrigues a,c, Margarida Bastos b, Maria Salomé Gomes a,c,
PMCID: PMC4068459  PMID: 24709266

Abstract

Mycobacterium avium causes respiratory disease in susceptible individuals, as well as disseminated infections in immunocompromised hosts, being an important cause of morbidity and mortality among these populations. Current therapies consist of a combination of antibiotics taken for at least 6 months, with no more than 60% overall clinical success. Furthermore, mycobacterial antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, urging the need to develop novel classes of antimicrobial drugs. One potential and interesting alternative strategy is the use of antimicrobial peptides (AMP). These are present in almost all living organisms as part of their immune system, acting as a first barrier against invading pathogens. In this context, we investigated the effect of several lactoferrin-derived AMP against M. avium. Short peptide sequences from both human and bovine lactoferricins, namely, hLFcin1-11 and LFcin17-30, as well as variants obtained by specific amino acid substitutions, were evaluated. All tested peptides significantly inhibited the axenic growth of M. avium, the bovine peptides being more active than the human. Arginine residues were found to be crucial for the display of antimycobacterial activity, whereas the all-d-amino-acid analogue of the bovine sequence displayed the highest mycobactericidal activity. These findings reveal the promising potential of lactoferricins against mycobacteria, thus opening the way for further research on their development and use as a new weapon against mycobacterial infections.

INTRODUCTION

The genus Mycobacterium includes several species capable of causing disease in humans and other animals. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the most deadly human pathogens, killing 1 million to 2 million people every year (1), while Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare are frequent opportunistic pathogens of immunosuppressed individuals and people with chronic respiratory distress (2, 3). Equipped with a complex lipid-rich cell envelope and adapted to proliferate inside the host's macrophages, mycobacteria tend to cause persistent infections, which are difficult to cure, requiring long treatment regimens that rely on the combination of several drugs. The increasing emergence of drug-resistant strains of mycobacteria makes the treatment of these diseases even more challenging (1).

The vast array of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) produced by virtually all living organisms as natural barriers against infection is a new and promising source of potential antimicrobial weapons. Although they have little sequence homology, the vast majority of AMP contain a high proportion of hydrophobic and cationic amino acids, and when in contact with bacterial membranes, they adopt amphipathic structures (4). The fact that AMP are active against a wide variety of microorganisms, combined with the observation that both the l and d enantiomers are active, supports the notion that the target of these peptides is a general structure conserved across different bacterial species, such as the cytoplasmic membrane (5, 6). Thus, it is thought that electrostatic attraction is responsible for the initial approach between the cationic peptide and the negatively charged phospholipids usually present at the pathogen's surface (4). Downstream events that lead to bacterial killing are not yet fully understood (4, 6). Acting in such a fundamental and conserved biological target as the bacterial membrane, AMP are believed to be less prone to the development of secondary microbial resistance than other types of antibiotics (4, 7). Therefore, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of action of AMP, along with the establishment of structure-activity relationships, is an essential step toward the identification and development of more active molecules with improved therapeutic characteristics and possibly higher specificity toward pathogens of interest.

Lactoferricins are naturally occurring peptides, formed by the cleavage of the highly cationic N1 terminal domain of the iron-binding protein lactoferrin. Bovine lactoferricin is composed by 25 amino acids, corresponding to residues 17 to 41 in the native protein (5, 8), and has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity (5, 915). A shorter version of bovine lactoferricin containing amino acids 17 to 30 (LFcin17-30) was found to have even higher antimicrobial activity (16). A human peptide with the first 11 amino acids from human lactoferrin (hLFcin1-11) was also demonstrated to be active against a great variety of bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant strains, and fungi, especially Candida albicans (1721), and was already used in different preclinical and clinical trials, where its overall safety was proved (20, 22).

In the present work, we investigated the activity against M. avium of hLFcin1-11 and LFcin17-30, as well as peptides obtained from these by specific amino acid substitutions, to test the importance of various factors on the potency of AMP against that pathogen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peptides.

Human lactoferricins (hLFcin1-11 and hLFcin1-11 all K) (Table 1) were prepared as C-terminal amides by standard Fmoc/tBu [1-(9H-fluoren-9-yl)-methoxycarbonyl)/tert-butyl chemistry] solid-phase peptide synthesis on a Liberty1 microwave (MW) peptide synthesizer (CEM Corporation, Mathews, NC, USA) (23). Briefly, Fmoc-Rink-amide resin (NovaBiochem, Switzerland) was preswelled for 15 min in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (VWR International, Portugal) and then transferred into the MW reaction vessel. The initial Fmoc deprotection step was carried out using 20% piperidine in DMF containing 0.1 M 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) in two MW irradiation pulses: 30 s at 24 W plus 3 min at 28 W, with the temperature in both cases being no higher than 75°C. The Fmoc-protected C-terminal amino acid (Bachem, Switzerland) was then coupled to the resin, using 5 molar equivalents (eq) of the Fmoc-protected amino acid in DMF (0.2 M), 5 eq of 0.5 M N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-O-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)uronium hexafluorophosphate/HOBt in DMF, and 10 eq of 2 M N-ethyl-N,N-diisopropylamine (DIPEA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) (VWR International, Portugal); the coupling step was carried out for 5 min at 35-W MW irradiation, with a maximum temperature reaching 75°C. The remaining amino acids were sequentially coupled in the C → N direction by means of similar deprotection and coupling cycles, except for incorporation of the following: (i) Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH, whose coupling was done in two steps, 25 min with no MW irradiation (room temperature), followed by 5 min of coupling at 25 W, and (ii) Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-OH and Fmoc-Trp(Boc)-OH, both also coupled in two steps, first 2 min of coupling without MW irradiation (room temperature) and then 4 min of coupling at 25 W, with the maximum temperature reaching 50°C. Following completion of sequence assembly, the peptides were released from the resin with the concomitant removal of side chain protecting groups, by a 3-h acidolysis at room temperature using a trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (VWR International, Portugal)-based cocktail containing triisopropylsilane (TIS) (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and water as scavengers (TFA-TIS-H2O, 95:2.5:2.5 [vol/vol/vol]). Crude products were purified by reverse-phase (RP) liquid chromatography on a Vydac C18 column (238TPB1520; Vydac, Hesperia, CA, USA) to a purity of at least 95%, as confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis on a Hitachi-Merck LaChrom Elite system equipped with a quaternary pump, a thermostated (Peltier effect)-automated sampler, and a diode-array detector (DAD). Pure peptides were quantified by UV absorption spectroscopy (Helios Gama, Spectronic Unicam), and their molecular weights were confirmed to be as expected by electrospray ionization/ion trap mass spectroscopy (ESI/IT MS) (LCQ-DecaXP LC-MS system; ThermoFinnigan).

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial activities of lactoferricin peptides against Mycobacterium avium

Peptide Amino acid sequence Mol wta Chargeb Activity (μM) (mean ± SD) against M. avium strainc
2447 SmT
2-151 SmT
2-151 SmD
IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90
hLFcin1-11 GRRRRSVQWCA 1,374 +5 15.8 ± 4.5 34.6 ± 22.4 11.0 ± 4.1 65.8 ± 19.3 15.2 ± 2.9 37.9 ± 15.9
hLFcin1-11 all K GKKKKSVQWCA 1,262 +5 39.1 ± 6.9d
LFcin17-30 FKCRRWQWRMKKLG 1,923 +6 14.2 ± 1.5 18.9 ± 4.0 8.0 ± 1.5 22.8 ± 9.1 12.4 ± 0.3 21.5 ± 4.0
D-LFcin17-30 FKCRRWQWRMKKLG 1,923 +6 10.7 ± 0.9e 14.4 ± 1.9
LFcin17-30 all K FKCKKWQWKMKKLG 1,839 +6 18.0 ± 2.1e,f,g 34.4 ± 8.2e,f
LFcin17-30 all R FRCRRWQWRMRRLG 2,007 +6 10.8 ± 1.6e 19.3 ± 4.8
a

Molecular weight.

b

Calculated overall charge at pH 7.0.

c

Each value represents the average for at least three independent experiments, with the corresponding SD indicated. IC50 is the peptide concentration that inhibits 50% of mycobacterial viability at 7 days of incubation. IC90 is the peptide concentration that inhibits 90% of mycobacterial viability at 7 days of incubation.

d

P < 0.0001 (compared to results for the parental peptide, hLFcin1-11).

e

P < 0.05 (compared to results for the parental peptide, LFcin17-30).

f

P < 0.05 (compared to results for LFcin17-30 all R, by cross-comparison within the bovine peptides).

g

P < 0.0001 (compared to results for hLFcin1-11 all K, by cross-comparison within all peptides).

Bovine lactoferricins (LFcin17-30, D-LFcin17-30, LFcin17-30 all R, and LFcin17-30 all K) (Table 1) were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis using Fmoc-protected amino acids (Orpegen Pharma GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) in a Syro II synthesizer (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) as described previously (24). Peptides were purified to a purity of at least 95% by semipreparative RP-HPLC (Jasco Corporation Tokyo, Japan) on a Vydac C18 column (218MS510; Vydac, Hesperia, CA, USA), and the authenticity of the peptides was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on a Microflex LRF mass spectrometer equipped with an additional gridless reflectron (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) as described previously (25).

All purified peptides were freeze-dried, after which peptide stock solutions were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH = 7.4) and stored at −20°C until use.

Bacteria.

The strains of Mycobacterium avium used in this study were clinical isolates. Strain 2447 smooth transparent variant (SmT) was provided by F. Portaels (Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium); strains 2-151, either SmT or SmD (smooth-domed), was provided by J. Belisle (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA).

Mycobacteria were grown to mid-log phase in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco, Sparks, MD) containing 0.05% of Tween 80 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 10% of ADC supplement (albumin-dextrose-catalase) at 37°C. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with saline containing 0.05% Tween 80, resuspended in the same solution, and briefly sonicated in order to disrupt bacterial clumps. The suspension was stored in aliquots at −80°C until use. Just before use, an aliquot was quickly thawed and diluted to the appropriate concentration.

Effect of antimicrobial peptides on the viability of M. avium in axenic cultures.

M. avium was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium to exponential phase (bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm). Bacteria were seeded at 106 CFU per well into 96-well flat bottom plates and incubated with the peptides in a final volume of 200 μl. Each condition was tested in triplicate. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a humid atmosphere. After 1, 2, 4, or 7 days of incubation, bacterial viability was measured by a CFU assay. A bacterial suspension from each well was serially diluted in water containing 0.05% Tween 80. The dilutions were plated in Middlebrook 7H10 agar medium (Difco, Sparks, MD) and supplemented with OADC (oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase), and the colonies were counted after 7 days at 37°C. The difference, in terms of log10 CFU/ml, between the first and the last days of incubation was designated “log increase.”

IC50 and IC90 (peptide concentration that inhibits 50% or 90% of mycobacterial growth after 7 days of incubation) values were obtained by fitting CFU data through a four-parameter dose-response sigmoidal curve using the GraphPad Prism software program (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). The reported final values correspond to the average of at least three independent experiments, with the corresponding standard deviation (SD) indicated.

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism software using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with adjustment for multiple comparisons in two ways: (i) comparing each value to a control (the corresponding parental peptide) and (ii) performing cross-comparisons among all peptides (within each family). The statistical significance, adjusted P value, and confidence intervals were obtained through the Bonferroni method for a chosen 95% significance.

SEM.

M. avium 2447 SmT was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium to exponential phase. Approximately 106 CFU of bacteria were incubated with the peptides (25 μM) for 2 days at 37°C. After incubation, cytospin centrifugation (1,000 rpm, 2 min) (Cytospin 4; Thermo Scientific) was used to concentrate the bacteria in glass coverslips previously coated with APES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane) to promote bacterial adherence. Bacteria were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2; pH = 7.2) for 2 h, followed by postfixation with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (1 h). Bacteria were then dehydrated by successive incubations with increasing concentrations of ethanol (10 to 100%), dried in a critical point dryer (CPD7501; Polaron), and sputter coated with a gold/palladium thin film (50 s with a 15-mA current) using SPI Module sputter coater equipment. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) exam was performed using a high-resolution (Schottky) environmental scanning electron microscope with X-ray microanalysis and electron backscattered diffraction analysis: Quanta 400 FEG ESEM/EDAX Genesis X4M.

TEM.

A suspension of M. avium 2447 SmT in exponential growth phase was incubated with the peptides (25 μM) for 2 days at 37°C. Bacteria were fixed with a 4% formaldehyde and 1.25% glutaraldehyde solution in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2; pH = 7.2) overnight at 4°C (first 3 h at room temperature), followed by postfixation with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (1 h) and 1% uranyl acetate in water (30 min), gradually dehydrated in ethanol (25 to 100%), included with propylene oxide, and embedded in Epon resin (26, 27). Ultrathin sections were stained with lead citrate and uranyl citrate for 15 min each, and the samples were observed and photographed in a Jeol JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (TEM).

RESULTS

Antimycobacterial activity of lactoferricin peptides.

Human and bovine lactoferricin peptides (hLFcin1-11 and LFcin17-30) were evaluated for their antimicrobial activities against three different strains of M. avium (2-151 SmT, 2447 SmT, and 2-151 SmD) (28). Both peptides were active against the three strains in axenic cultures, with an IC50 of ≤15 μM (Table 1). The bovine peptide tended to be more active than the human one, exhibiting lower IC90 values for all M. avium strains. The activities of each peptide were similar between the M. avium strains (Table 1).

Arginine residues were reported to be critical for the antimicrobial activity of lactoferricins (5, 8, 29). hLFcin1-11 has four arginine residues, and LFcin17-30 has three (Table 1). In order to investigate whether these residues were important for the display of antimycobacterial activity, we synthesized and tested lactoferricin analogues in which arginine residues were replaced by lysine (all-K variants). Lysine was chosen because it has the same charge as arginine, and hence any differences in activity would not be attributable to the alteration of overall positive charge. Since bovine LFcin17-30 has three lysine residues, we also tested a variant of this peptide in which all lysines were replaced by arginines (all-R variant).

When tested against M. avium 2447 SmT in axenic culture, the all-K variants of each peptide were significantly less active than the corresponding original peptide (Table 1) (P < 0.0001 for IC50 for human peptides; P = 0.0329 for IC50 and P = 0.0074 for IC90 for bovine peptides). Conversely, the all-R variant of LFcin17-30 was slightly more active than the original peptide (Table 1) (for IC50, P = 0.0377). Of note, even in the all-K variants, the bovine peptide exhibited a stronger antimicrobial activity than the human peptide (P < 0.0001) (Table 1).

Given that one of the limitations of therapeutic applications of peptides is their sensitivity to proteolysis, we thought it would be interesting to know whether replacement of all native amino acids in LFcin17-30 by their d enantiomers (less prone to degradation) would preserve the peptide's activity against M. avium. Remarkably, the all-d LFcin17-30 sequence (D-LFcin17-30) was found to be significantly more active than the corresponding native peptide (Table 1) (for IC50, P = 0.0455).

We observed in all cases an abrupt decrease in mycobacterial viability at peptide concentrations around 12.5 μM, which translated into very close values for IC50 and IC90 (Table 1). This suggested that a critical concentration threshold may exist for the peptides to exert their activity. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the effect of the human and bovine parental peptides, hLFcin1-11 and LFcin17-30, on M. avium 2447 SmT using narrower concentration intervals in the 12.5 to 25 μM range. As shown in Fig. 1, this experiment confirmed the existence of a threshold concentration and further showed that the dose-effect correlation is different for the two peptides. For hLFcin1-11, there is a gradual decrease in the viability of M. avium as the peptide concentration increases, whereas for LFcin17-30, there is a critical inhibitory concentration above which the increase in the peptide concentration has no further effect on mycobacterial viability.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Direct effect of human and bovine lactoferricin on M. avium viability at 7 days of incubation. M. avium 2447 SmT was incubated with hLFcin1-11 or LFcin17-30 at 0, 6.25, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM concentrations. M. avium viability was determined by measuring CFU after 7 days of incubation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test): ***, P < 0.001. The results of one experiment out of three are shown.

To assess in detail the time dependence of the action of lactoferricin peptides against M. avium 2447 SmT, the antimicrobial activity was determined by CFU at the end of 1, 2, and 4 days of incubation. No significant effects were seen up to 1 day. All peptides showed significant inhibitory activity after 2 days of incubation at 12.5 μM (Fig. 2) and 25 μM (not shown). For the most active peptides (hLFcin1-11, LFcin17-30, D-LFcin17-30, and LFcin17-30 all R), mycobacterial death was observed at 4 days (Fig. 2).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Direct effect of lactoferricins on M. avium viability at 1, 2, and 4 days of incubation. M. avium 2447 SmT was incubated with hLFcin1-11, hLFcin1-11 all K, LFcin17-30, D-LFcin17-30, LFcin17-30 all K, or LFcin17-30 all R at 0 and 12.5 μM. M. avium viability was determined by measuring CFU after 1, 2, and 4 days of incubation. The results of one experiment out of three are shown.

Similar to what was observed at 7 days of incubation, at shorter times the bovine peptides tended to be more active than the human ones, and the peptides with arginines (human or bovine) were more active than those with lysines.

Surface and ultrastructural alterations in M. avium induced by lactoferricins.

To gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of antimicrobial action of lactoferricin peptides against M. avium, we performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to identify surface and ultrastructural alterations in the bacteria upon peptide treatment. After 2 days of incubation with lactoferricins at 25 μM, SEM analysis of M. avium 2447 SmT revealed overall shape deformations (Fig. 3, left panel, arrow), increased roughness of the bacterial surface, and the accumulation of biological material outside the cells (Fig. 3, left panel, arrowhead), this last suggesting leakage of intracellular content. Ultrastructural alterations were also seen using TEM, namely, condensation of cytoplasmic dense material, such as proteins (Fig. 3, right panel, empty arrow), once again with the suggestion of leakage of intracellular material, indicated by accumulation of material extracellularly (Fig. 3; right panel, arrowhead), as well as translucent cytoplasm and a high number of “ghost” cells (Fig. 3, right panel, asterisk). In agreement with the previous results for activity, the bovine peptides induced more severe structural alterations in the bacteria than the human ones, especially D-LFcin17-30 and LFcin17-30 all R (Fig. 3).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Surface and ultrastructural alterations in M. avium induced by lactoferricins at 2 days of incubation. M. avium 2447 SmT was incubated with hLFcin1-11, hLFcin1-11 all K, LFcin17-30, D-LFcin17-30, LFcin17-30 all K, or LFcin17-30 all R at 25 μM for 2 days. Cells were observed and photographed in a scanning electron microscope (left panels) and in a transmission electron microscope (right panels). Representative pictures are shown. Bar= 1 μm (left panels) or 0.5 μm (right panels). Symbols: arrow, shape deformations; arrowhead, increased roughness and accumulation of intracellular material outside; empty arrow, condensation of cytoplasmic material; asterisk, translucent cytoplasm and ghost cells.

DISCUSSION

Considering the potential of AMP as new alternative therapies to fight infectious diseases and the urgent need to develop more efficient therapies for infections caused by mycobacteria, we tested several lactoferricin peptides against Mycobacterium avium. Aside from the antimicrobial activity, toxicity is a fundamental parameter in possible future use. hLFcin1-11 has already been used in different preclinical and clinical trials, where its overall safety was proved (20, 22), and LFcin17-30 has been shown to be nontoxic for erythrocytes and rat hepatocytes up to a 50 μM concentration (30). In the present work, we found that both the human and bovine lactoferricins (hLFcin1-11 and LFcin17-30, respectively) were active against M. avium strains of different virulences, the bovine peptide being more active than the human one.

AMP vary widely in many aspects, such as length, sequence, structure, and source, but they share important common traits, such as a positive charge, presumed to be fundamental for interaction with the negatively charged surface of pathogen cells (4, 6), and amphipathicity, which enables better interaction with the hydrophobic part of the microbial membrane, leading to its disruption (31, 32). Arginine residues were previously suggested to be important for the antimicrobial activity of lactoferricins (5, 8, 29) and also to potentiate the internalization of peptides (3335). Therefore, we studied lactoferricin variants with arginines replaced by lysines and vice versa. As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2, all peptides, human and bovine, with all arginines replaced by lysines were less active against M. avium, whereas when lysines were replaced by arginines, the peptides were more active. This shows that arginine residues are crucial for the antimicrobial activity of these peptides against M. avium. The contribution of arginine for activity is probably not charge related, since it bears the same charge as lysine (+1). The higher activities of peptides with arginine residues could be the result of the presence of the bulky guanidinium group on the side chain, enabling a better interaction with the membranes, since multiple hydrogen bonds can in this case be formed with the lipid headgroups around, whereas lysines can interact with only one (5, 8, 33, 35, 36). Arginine can also establish stronger cation-π interactions, which occur mainly between aromatic residues (e.g., tryptophan) and residues with positively charged side chains (e.g., arginines and lysines), that could allow the peptides to penetrate deeper into the membrane (8, 33, 35, 36). Moreover, arginines can form hydrogen bonds while establishing cation-π interactions, with tryptophan, for instance, whereas lysines cannot (8, 33, 35, 36). All these factors combined may have contributed to a more efficient activity against mycobacteria (5, 8, 29, 33, 36).

Due to the large diversity of AMP and of their properties, there is most probably no universal mechanism for their action. In this work, we have contributed to the elucidation of the mechanism of action of lactoferricins against M. avium. Our observation that the d enantiomer of LFcin17-30 is more active than the l form suggests that antimycobacterial activity is not dependent on chiral centers, such as specific protein receptors, which is in agreement with previous observations made for lactoferricin and other AMP, such as magainin, cecropin, melittin, and protegrin, against other pathogens (5, 6, 3739). One of the major drawbacks of the use of AMP in the clinic is their susceptibility to proteases and other plasma components, resulting in low metabolic stability and bioavailability (40). One way to overcome this problem is to use d peptides, which are more resistant to protease activity (32, 41). This seems to be the case for LFcin17-30, which exhibited a higher activity against M. avium with all d-amino acids, indicating that this can be used advantageously in comparison to the l enantiomer.

The concentration-effect curves obtained for the antimicrobial activities of lactoferricins did not show a gradual decrease. Around 12.5 μM, there was a sharp drop in mycobacterial viability, more pronounced in the case of the bovine peptide, reflected in very close values for IC50 and IC90. This observation is in line with some models of AMP activity that predict the existence of a threshold concentration for their antimicrobial activity (4).

M. avium is a slow-growing mycobacterium, and thus we used 7 days of culture to determine lactoferricin activity. However, previous reports showed that LFcin17-30 is able to exert antimicrobial activity against other pathogens in about 1 h (24, 4244). In order to evaluate the kinetics of the activity of lactoferricins against M. avium, we performed several assays with shorter culture times. We did not observe any significant decrease in the number of viable mycobacterial cells in less than 2 days of incubation, with peptide concentrations up to 25 μM (data not shown). This “delay” in activity against M. avium compared to that against other pathogens can be explained by the particular characteristics of the mycobacterial cell wall, as well as an intrinsic low rate of proliferation. Mycobacterium species are characterized by a complex hydrophobic envelope of extremely low fluidity and high impermeability, which contributes to the capacity of the pathogen to survive inside the host and resist chemotherapy (45, 46). Furthermore, the possibility of an internal target for the action of these peptides against M. avium cannot be discarded. In fact, there are numerous evidences in the literature pointing to the probable existence of an internal target for lactoferricins (5, 4749).

Finally, electron microscopy studies showed that all lactoferricin peptides tested induced significant changes both in the surface and in the ultrastructural organization of the mycobacterial cells. In agreement with the bacterial viability assays, D-LFcin17-30 and the all-R variant showed the most drastic effects on the mycobacterial morphostructure. However, these studies did not allow us to obtain definitive information on what is the target (or targets) of the peptides. The observed accumulation of biological material outside the cells, seen by both SEM and TEM, and the presence of translucent cytoplasm and a high number of “ghost” cells (TEM) indicate leakage and are compatible with cell membrane permeabilization. Clearer evidences that the peptides act by permeabilization, such as the appearance of vesicular budding and disappearance of the cell wall or membrane, were not observed. A mechanism of action that includes crossing over the bacterial surface and acting on internal targets has been proposed for bovine lactoferricins. The higher activity of lactoferricins containing arginines also supports this hypothesis, since this amino acid is often correlated with peptides that exert their activity on internal targets (3335), as opposed to lysines, which are usually described as crucial for membrane-lytic activities. In recent studies, we have shown that LFcin17-30 has a mild effect on model membranes, acting by lipid segregation instead of leading to full membrane disruption, as observed for other membrane-active peptides (50). Further, Haukland et al. (47) showed that lactoferricin is found in the cytoplasm of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and Ulvatne et al. (49) showed that it inhibits the macromolecular synthesis (DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis) of E. coli and Bacillus subtilis. The alterations seen suggest that the mechanism of action of the studied lactoferricins against mycobacteria is not confined to the cell wall or membrane but probably also includes action on internal targets, leading to impairment of several intracellular processes, such as DNA replication, DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis, protein folding, etc., which eventually culminates in cell death.

In summary, key molecular features of lactoferricin-based peptides for the display of antimycobacterial activity were identified, contributing to the understanding of their mechanism of action against mycobacteria. Hence, this work demonstrates that lactoferricin-related AMP are promising molecules for development of clinically useful weapons to treat infections caused by mycobacteria.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research received support from FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia), Lisbon, Portugal, and European Social Fund through projects Pest-C/QUI/UI0081/2011 and PEst-C/QUI/UI0081/2013, awarded to CIQ(UP); “NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000002-Host-Pathogen Interactions,” cofunded by Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON.2, O Novo Norte), under the Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional (QREN), awarded to IBMC; and POFC, COMPETE program FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009400 and project PTDC/CTM/101484/2008, awarded to CIQUP. T.S. receives Ph.D. grant SFRH/BD/77564/2011 from FCT. This work also benefited from a grant from the University of Amsterdam for research into the focal point of oral infections and inflammation to J.G.M.B. and K.N.

We thank Instituto Nacional de Engenharia Biomédica (INEB), Porto, Portugal, for giving access to the critical point dryer essential for SEM experiments, Rui Fernandes from the Histology and Electron Microscopy Service of Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Porto, Portugal, for technical assistance with transmission electron microscopy, and Daniela Silva from Centro de Materiais da Universidade do Porto (CEMUP), Porto, Portugal, for technical assistance with scanning electron microscopy.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 7 April 2014

REFERENCES

  • 1.Villemagne B, Crauste C, Flipo M, Baulard AR, Deprez B, Willand N. 2012. Tuberculosis: The drug development pipeline at a glance. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 51:1–16. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.02.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cook JL. 2010. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: opportunistic environmental pathogens for predisposed hosts. Br. Med. Bull. 96:45–59. 10.1093/bmb/ldq035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Karakousis PC, Moore RD, Chaisson RE. 2004. Mycobacterium avium complex in patients with HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Lancet Infect. Dis. 4:557–565. 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01130-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Teixeira V, Feio MJ, Bastos M. 2012. Role of lipids in the interaction of antimicrobial peptides with membranes. Prog. Lipid Res. 51:149–177. 10.1016/j.plipres.2011.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gifford JL, Hunter HN, Vogel HJ. 2005. Lactoferricin: a lactoferrin-derived peptide with antimicrobial, antiviral, antitumor and immunological properties. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62:2588–2598. 10.1007/s00018-005-5373-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lohner K, Blondelle SE. 2005. Molecular mechanisms of membrane perturbation by antimicrobial peptides and the use of biophysical studies in the design of novel peptide antibiotics. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 8:241–256. 10.2174/1386207053764576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nguyen LT, Haney EF, Vogel HJ. 2011. The expanding scope of antimicrobial peptide structures and their modes of action. Trends Biotechnol. 29:464–472. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chan DI, Prenner EJ, Vogel HJ. 2006. Tryptophan- and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptides: structures and mechanisms of action. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758:1184–1202. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bellamy W, Wakabayashi H, Takase M, Kawase K, Shimamura S, Tomita M. 1993. Killing of Candida albicans by lactoferricin B, a potent antimicrobial peptide derived from the N-terminal region of bovine lactoferrin. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 182:97–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leon-Sicairos N, Reyes-Lopez M, Ordaz-Pichardo C, de la Garza M. 2006. Microbicidal action of lactoferrin and lactoferricin and their synergistic effect with metronidazole in Entamoeba histolytica. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84:327–336. 10.1139/o06-060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Omata Y, Satake M, Maeda R, Saito A, Shimazaki K, Yamauchi K, Uzuka Y, Tanabe S, Sarashina T, Mikami T. 2001. Reduction of the infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii and Eimeria stiedai sporozoites by treatment with bovine lactoferricin. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:187–190. 10.1292/jvms.63.187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turchany JM, Aley SB, Gillin FD. 1995. Giardicidal activity of lactoferrin and N-terminal peptides. Infect. Immun. 63:4550–4552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jenssen H, Hancock RE. 2009. Antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin. Biochimie 91:19–29. 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oo TZ, Cole N, Garthwaite L, Willcox MD, Zhu H. 2010. Evaluation of synergistic activity of bovine lactoferricin with antibiotics in corneal infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:1243–1251. 10.1093/jac/dkq106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sanchez-Gomez S, Japelj B, Jerala R, Moriyon I, Fernandez Alonso M, Leiva J, Blondelle SE, Andra J, Brandenburg K, Lohner K, Martinez de Tejada G. 2011. Structural features governing the activity of lactoferricin-derived peptides that act in synergy with antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:218–228. 10.1128/AAC.00904-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Groenink J, Walgreen-Weterings E, van 't Hof W, Veerman ECI, Nieuw Amerongen AV. 1999. Cationic amphipathic peptides, derived from bovine and human lactoferrins, with antimicrobial activity against oral pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 179:217–222. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08730.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A. 2010. Antimicrobial peptides: the ancient arm of the human immune system. Virulence 1:440–464. 10.4161/viru.1.5.12983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dijkshoorn L, Brouwer CP, Bogaards SJ, Nemec A, van den Broek PJ, Nibbering PH. 2004. The synthetic N-terminal peptide of human lactoferrin, hLF(1-11), is highly effective against experimental infection caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4919–4921. 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4919-4921.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lupetti A, Paulusma-Annema A, Welling MM, Dogterom-Ballering H, Brouwer CP, Senesi S, Van Dissel JT, Nibbering PH. 2003. Synergistic activity of the N-terminal peptide of human lactoferrin and fluconazole against Candida species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:262–267. 10.1128/AAC.47.1.262-267.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brouwer CP, Rahman M, Welling MM. 2011. Discovery and development of a synthetic peptide derived from lactoferrin for clinical use. Peptides 32:1953–1963. 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brouwer CP, Welling MM. 2008. Various routes of administration of (99m)Tc-labeled synthetic lactoferrin antimicrobial peptide hLF 1-11 enables monitoring and effective killing of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in mice. Peptides 29:1109–1117. 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Velden WJ, van Iersel TM, Blijlevens NM, Donnelly JP. 2009. Safety and tolerability of the antimicrobial peptide human lactoferrin 1-11 (hLF1-11). BMC Med. 7:44. 10.1186/1741-7015-7-44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brandt M, Gammeltoft S, Jensen K. 2006. Microwave heating for solid-phase peptide synthesis: general evaluation and application to 15-mer phosphopeptides. Int. J. Peptide Res. Ther. 12:349–357. 10.1007/s10989-006-9038-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bolscher JG, Adão R, Nazmi K, van den Keybus PA, van 't Hof W, Nieuw Amerongen AV, Bastos M, Veerman EC. 2009. Bactericidal activity of LFchimera is stronger and less sensitive to ionic strength than its constituent lactoferricin and lactoferrampin peptides. Biochimie 91:123–132. 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bolscher JG, Oudhoff MJ, Nazmi K, Antos JM, Guimaraes CP, Spooner E, Haney EF, Vallejo JJ, Vogel HJ, van't Hof W, Ploegh HL, Veerman EC. 2011. Sortase A as a tool for high-yield histatin cyclization. FASEB J. 25:2650–2658. 10.1096/fj.11-182212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Silva MT, Macedo PM. 1983. The interpretation of the ultrastructure of mycobacterial cells in transmission electron microscopy of ultrathin sections. Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis. 51:225–234 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Silva MT, Macedo PM. 1984. Ultrastructural characterization of normal and damaged membranes of Mycobacterium leprae and of cultivable mycobacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130:369–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gomes MS, Florido M, Cordeiro JV, Teixeira CM, Takeuchi O, Akira S, Appelberg R. 2004. Limited role of the Toll-like receptor-2 in resistance to Mycobacterium avium. Immunology 111:179–185. 10.1111/j.0019-2805.2003.01807.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kang JH, Lee MK, Kim KL, Hahm KS. 1996. Structure-biological activity relationships of 11-residue highly basic peptide segment of bovine lactoferrin. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 48:357–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.van der Kraan MI, Nazmi K, Teeken A, Groenink J, van 't Hof W, Veerman EC, Bolscher JG, Nieuw Amerongen AV. 2005. Lactoferrampin, an antimicrobial peptide of bovine lactoferrin, exerts its candidacidal activity by a cluster of positively charged residues at the C-terminus in combination with a helix-facilitating N-terminal part. Biol. Chem. 386:137–142. 10.1515/BC.2005.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shai Y, Makovitzky A, Avrahami D. 2006. Host defense peptides and lipopeptides: modes of action and potential candidates for the treatment of bacterial and fungal infections. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 7:479–486. 10.2174/138920306779025620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hancock RE, Sahl HG. 2006. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:1551–1557. 10.1038/nbt1267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hansen M, Kilk K, Langel U. 2008. Predicting cell-penetrating peptides. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60:572–579. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mitchell DJ, Kim DT, Steinman L, Fathman CG, Rothbard JB. 2000. Polyarginine enters cells more efficiently than other polycationic homopolymers. J. Pept. Res. 56:318–325. 10.1034/j.1399-3011.2000.00723.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rothbard JB, Jessop TC, Lewis RS, Murray BA, Wender PA. 2004. Role of membrane potential and hydrogen bonding in the mechanism of translocation of guanidinium-rich peptides into cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:9506–9507. 10.1021/ja0482536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Torcato IM, Huang YH, Franquelim HG, Gaspar D, Craik DJ, Castanho MA, Troeira Henriques S. 2012. Design and characterization of novel antimicrobial peptides, R-BP100 and RW-BP100, with activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1828:944–955. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Merrifield EL, Mitchell SA, Ubach J, Boman HG, Andreu D, Merrifield RB. 1995. D-Enantiomers of 15-residue cecropin A-melittin hybrids. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 46:214–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wade D, Boman A, Wahlin B, Drain CM, Andreu D, Boman HG, Merrifield RB. 1990. All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:4761–4765. 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wakabayashi H, Matsumoto H, Hashimoto K, Teraguchi S, Takase M, Hayasawa H. 1999. N-Acylated and D enantiomer derivatives of a nonamer core peptide of lactoferricin B showing improved antimicrobial activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1267–1269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rotem S, Mor A. 2009. Antimicrobial peptide mimics for improved therapeutic properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1788:1582–1592. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haug BE, Strom MB, Svendsen MJSM. 2007. The medicinal chemistry of short lactoferricin-based antibacterial peptides. Curr. Med. Chem. 14:1–18. 10.2174/092986707779313435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Flores-Villasenor H, Canizalez-Roman A, Reyes-Lopez M, Nazmi K, de la Garza M, Zazueta-Beltran J, Leon-Sicairos N, Bolscher JG. 2010. Bactericidal effect of bovine lactoferrin, LFcin, LFampin and LFchimera on antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Biometals 23:569–578. 10.1007/s10534-010-9306-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lopez-Soto F, Leon-Sicairos N, Nazmi K, Bolscher JG, de la Garza M. 2010. Microbicidal effect of the lactoferrin peptides lactoferricin17-30, lactoferrampin265-284, and lactoferrin chimera on the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Biometals 23:563–568. 10.1007/s10534-010-9295-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Silva T, Abengozar MA, Fernandez-Reyes M, Andreu D, Nazmi K, Bolscher JG, Bastos M, Rivas L. 2012. Enhanced leishmanicidal activity of cryptopeptide chimeras from the active N1 domain of bovine lactoferrin. Amino Acids 43:2265–2277. 10.1007/s00726-012-1304-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Abdallah AM, Gey van Pittius NC, Champion PA, Cox J, Luirink J, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Appelmelk BJ, Bitter W. 2007. Type VII secretion—mycobacteria show the way. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:883–891. 10.1038/nrmicro1773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nigou J, Gilleron M, Puzo G. 2003. Lipoarabinomannans: from structure to biosynthesis. Biochimie 85:153–166. 10.1016/S0300-9084(03)00048-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Haukland HH, Ulvatne H, Sandvik K, Vorland LH. 2001. The antimicrobial peptides lactoferricin B and magainin 2 cross over the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and reside in the cytoplasm. FEBS Lett. 508:389–393. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03100-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu Y, Han F, Xie Y, Wang Y. 2011. Comparative antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of bovine lactoferricin-derived synthetic peptides. Biometals 24:1069–1078. 10.1007/s10534-011-9465-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ulvatne H, Samuelsen O, Haukland HH, Kramer M, Vorland LH. 2004. Lactoferricin B inhibits bacterial macromolecular synthesis in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 237:377–384. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09720.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Silva T, Adao R, Nazmi K, Bolscher JG, Funari SS, Uhrikova D, Bastos M. 2013. Structural diversity and mode of action on lipid membranes of three lactoferrin candidacidal peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1828:1329–1339. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES