Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2014 Jul;80(14):4374–4382. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00739-14

Purine Biosynthesis, Biofilm Formation, and Persistence of an Insect-Microbe Gut Symbiosis

Jiyeun Kate Kim a, Jeong Yun Kwon a, Soo Kyoung Kim b, Sang Heum Han a, Yeo Jin Won a, Joon Hee Lee b, Chan-Hee Kim a, Takema Fukatsu c, Bok Luel Lee a,
Editor: C R Lovell
PMCID: PMC4068690  PMID: 24814787

Abstract

The Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiotic system is an experimental model system for studying the molecular mechanisms of an insect-microbe gut symbiosis. When the symbiotic midgut of Riptortus pedestris was investigated by light and transmission electron microscopy, the lumens of the midgut crypts that harbor colonizing Burkholderia symbionts were occupied by an extracellular matrix consisting of polysaccharides. This observation prompted us to search for symbiont genes involved in the induction of biofilm formation and to examine whether the biofilms are necessary for the symbiont to establish a successful symbiotic association with the host. To answer these questions, we focused on purN and purT, which independently catalyze the same step of bacterial purine biosynthesis. When we disrupted purN and purT in the Burkholderia symbiont, the ΔpurN and ΔpurT mutants grew normally, and only the ΔpurT mutant failed to form biofilms. Notably, the ΔpurT mutant exhibited a significantly lower level of cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP) than the wild type and the ΔpurN mutant, suggesting involvement of the secondary messenger c-di-GMP in the defect of biofilm formation in the ΔpurT mutant, which might operate via impaired purine biosynthesis. The host insects infected with the ΔpurT mutant exhibited a lower infection density, slower growth, and lighter body weight than the host insects infected with the wild type and the ΔpurN mutant. These results show that the function of purT of the gut symbiont is important for the persistence of the insect gut symbiont, suggesting the intricate biological relevance of purine biosynthesis, biofilm formation, and symbiosis.

INTRODUCTION

The Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis is a newly emerging insect-bacterium symbiotic system. This system has exceptional merits as an experimental symbiosis model. Most insect symbionts are generally transmitted from mother to offspring and are highly adapted to unique ecological niches within their hosts (1). Thus, it is not easy to culture them in vitro, and consequently, they tend to be neither genetically tractable nor manipulatable (2, 3). On the other hand, every generation of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae) acquires its betaproteobacterial genus Burkholderia symbionts from the environment and harbors them exclusively in a specialized region (the M4 region) of the posterior midgut, which contains numerous crypts (4). Given its free-living nature, the Burkholderia symbiont is cultivable on standard microbiological media and thus can be genetically manipulated. The genetically manipulated symbiont strains can then easily be introduced into the host insects via feeding (58). Because newly hatched R. pedestris nymphs are aposymbiotic, symbiotic and aposymbiotic insect lines are easily established by controlling the feeding of the Burkholderia cells (6, 9, 10). These features show the practicality of the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiotic system for studying the complex cross talk that occurs between insects and symbiotic bacteria at the molecular and biochemical levels.

Recently, the genome of the Burkholderia symbiont strain RPE64 has been sequenced (11), and using genetically manipulated Burkholderia symbionts, several novel bacterial factors necessary for establishing symbiosis with the host have been identified (1214). When the uppP gene of the Burkholderia symbiont, which is known to be involved in the biosynthesis of bacterial cell wall components, is mutated, the peptidoglycan integrity of the bacteria is weakened and the uppP mutant is unable to colonize the host midgut (12). When the purine nucleotide biosynthesis genes purL and purM are mutated, the mutants can colonize the host midgut but fail to reach a normal population level (13). When the bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) synthesis genes phaB and phaC are mutated, the PHA-deficient mutant strains are able to colonize and reach a normal population, but their population decreases in the later stages of symbiotic association, indicating that PHA is important for bacterial persistence in the host midgut (14). These mutant studies collectively suggest that the symbiotic gut environment is somewhat hostile for the symbiont and that bacterial symbiotic factors are intimately related to the conditions of the host symbiotic organ.

During preliminary experiments on the host symbiotic organ to further identify additional symbiotic factors, we observed the presence of an extracellular matrix with a polysaccharide nature, a possible component of the biofilms, in the crypt lumen populated by Burkholderia symbionts. Based on this observation, we hypothesized that Burkholderia symbionts generate biofilms in the host gut to successfully establish an insect-microbe symbiosis. Because this biofilm formation is regulated by the intracellular level of cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP) (15), which is affected by the purine nucleotide pool (1618), we aimed to generate biofilm-defective strains by manipulating the intracellular purine nucleotide pool. We thus constructed two Burkholderia mutant strains by disrupting the purine biosynthesis genes purN and purT and examined the biofilm-forming abilities and symbiotic properties of the mutant strains. In this study, we demonstrate the intricate relationships between bacterial purine biosynthesis and biofilm formation, as well as their effects on symbiont persistence and host fitness in the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transmission electron microscopy.

Dissected M4 midgut samples were prefixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.05% ruthenium red in a 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (SCB) (pH 7.4) at 4°C for 18 h, washed three times with 0.1 M SCB at room temperature for 15 min each time, and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide and 0.05% ruthenium red in 0.1 M SCB for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes with 0.1 M SCB, the samples were dehydrated and cleared with an ethanol and propylene oxide series and embedded in Epon 812 resin. The embedded samples were trimmed and sectioned on an ultramicrotome (Reichert SuperNova; Leica) and processed into semiultrathin sections and ultrathin sections. The ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and then observed under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H-7600).

PAS staining on a midgut section.

The semithin sections of the M4 midgut samples were heat mounted on glass slides and subjected to periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining according to the manufacturer's protocol (Sigma-Aldrich). The sections were hydrated with distilled water for 1 min and treated with a 1% periodic acid solution for 5 min. After a gentle rinse with distilled water, the sections were incubated with Schiff's reagent for 15 min at room temperature. After rinsing in running tap water for 5 min, the sections were air dried, mounted with distilled water and coverslips, and observed under a light microscope (BX50; Olympus).

Bacteria and media.

Table 1 lists the bacterial strains used in this study. Escherichia coli strains were cultured at 37°C in LB medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 0.5% NaCl). The Burkholderia symbiont strain RPE75 was cultured at 30°C in YG medium (0.4% glucose, 0.5% yeast extract, and 0.1% NaCl) (19). The following supplements were added to the culture media: 30 μg/ml rifampin and/or 50 μg/ml kanamycin.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in the study

Strain or plasmid Relevant characteristics Source or reference
Burkholderia symbiont
    RPE75 Burkholderia symbiont (RPE64); Rifr 19
    BBL007 RPE75 ΔpurN; Rifr This study
    BBL008 RPE75 ΔpurT; Rifr This study
    BBL009 RPE75 ΔpurN and ΔpurT; Rifr This study
E. coli
    DH5α λ ϕ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rK mK) supE44 thi-1 gyrA relA1 Invitrogen
    PIR1 F Δlac169 rpoS(Am) robA1 creC510 hsdR514 endA recA1 uidAMluI)::pir-116 Invitrogen
    pHBL1 PIR1 carrying pSTV28 and pEVS104 14
Plasmids
    pSV28 p15Aori; Cmr TaKaRa
    pEVS104 oriR6K helper plasmid containing conjugal tra and trb; Kmr 46
    pK18mobsacB pMB1ori allelic exchange vector containing oriT; Kmr 47
    pBBR122 Broad-host-range vector; Cmr Kmr 48

Generation of deletion mutant strains.

The deletion of the chromosomal purN and/or purT genes of the Burkholderia symbiont was accomplished by homologous recombination, followed by allelic exchange, using the suicide vector pK18mobsacB containing 5′ and 3′ regions of the gene of interest, as described previously (14). The 5′ and 3′ regions of the gene of interest were first amplified from the Burkholderia symbiont RPE75 by PCR, using the primers listed in Table 2. After digestion of the amplified PCR products and the pK18mobsacB vector with the appropriate restriction enzymes, they were ligated and transformed into E. coli DH5α cells. The transformed E. coli cells were selected on LB agar plates containing kanamycin. The positive donor cells carrying pK18mobsacB containing the 5′ and 3′ regions of the gene of interest were then mixed with recipient Burkholderia RPE75 cells, along with helper HBL1 cells to transfer the cloned vector to Burkholderia RPE75. After allowing the first crossover (single crossover) by culturing the cell mixture for triparental conjugation on YG agar plates, RPE75 cells with the first crossover were selected on YG agar plates containing rifampin and kanamycin. The second crossover was allowed by culturing the cells with the single crossover in YG medium and then selecting them on YG agar plates containing rifampin and sucrose (200 μg/ml). The deletion of the purN or purT gene was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

TABLE 2.

PCR primers used for generating mutant strains

PCR target region Product size (bp) Primer name Sequence (5′–3′) Restriction site
5′ region of purN 917 purN-L-P1 CGCGGATCCGTGCCCGCTGATGATGTAG BamHI
purN-L-P2 CGCTCTAGAATGATCCACCACGATGGTTT XbaI
3′ region of purN 888 purN-R-P3 CGCTCTAGACCGACCTCGTCGTACTGG XbaI
purN-R-P4 CGCAAGCTTCTCGCCTTGATCGGATTC HindIII
5′ region of purT 937 purT-L-P1 CGCGAATTCGTCGAGATAAGGCTGCTCCA EcoRI
purT-L-P2 CGCTCTAGAGATCACTTCCTTGCCGAGTT XbaI
3′ region of purT 906 purT-R-P1 CGCTCTAGAGGAGCAAGCAAGTGAAATGG XbaI
purT-R-P2 CGCAAGCTTATCAAGCTGCGTTGGAACTT HindIII
purN complementation 1,161 purN-com-P1 CGAAGGTCATCACGCAGAC
purN-com-P2 CGAGATGCGAAAACTCCATT
purT complementation 1,730 purT-com-P1 AACCGTAAGCGTATCGCACT
purT-com-P2 GAGCGGCACGATCTTCAG

Generation of complemented mutant strains.

To complement the purN or purT deletion mutant, we used the broad-host-range vector pBBR122 to clone the purN or purT gene (Table 1). Blunt-end PCR inserts containing the gene of interest were prepared using the primers for complementation (Table 2). The amplified DNA fragments were cloned into the DraI site of pBBR122, and the cloned vector was transformed into E. coli DH5α cells. Using a triparental conjugation with HBL1, pBBR122 carrying either the purN or purT gene was transferred to the recipient Burkholderia RPE75 ΔpurN or ΔpurT mutant strain, respectively. The complemented strains were selected on YG agar plates containing rifampin and kanamycin.

Insect rearing and symbiont inoculation.

R. pedestris was maintained in our insect laboratory at 26°C under a long-day cycle of 16 h light and 8 h dark, as described previously (12). Nymphal insects were reared in clean plastic containers with soybean seeds and distilled water containing 0.05% ascorbic acid (DWA). When newborn nymphs molted to the second-instar stage, DWA and soybeans were restricted for 10 h, after which a symbiont inoculum solution was provided to the thirsty nymphs using wet cotton balls in a small petri dish. The inoculum solution consisted of mid-log-phase cultured Burkholderia cells in DWA at a concentration of 107 cells/ml.

Measurement of bacterial growth in liquid media.

The growth curves of the Burkholderia symbiont strains were examined either in YG medium or in minimal medium (1.3% Na2HPO4 · 2H2O, 0.3% KH2PO4, 0.1% NH4Cl, 0.05% NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.4% glucose). The starting cell solutions were prepared by adjusting the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) to 0.05 with stationary-phase cells in either YG medium or minimal medium. The media were incubated on a rotator shaker at 180 rpm at 30°C for 18 h, and the OD600 was monitored every 3 h using a spectrophotometer (Mecasys, South Korea).

Microtiter plate biofilm assay.

Mid-log-phase Burkholderia symbiont cells were prepared by adjusting the OD600 to 0.8 in YG medium containing rifampin, and 150 μl of the cell solution was added to each well of 96-well plates. The 96-well plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h with shaking at 120 rpm. At the end of the incubation, the cell solution in each well was carefully transferred to a tube to measure its OD600 value. The wells were washed three times with 10 mM phosphate buffer (PB) (0.058% monosodium phosphate and 0.154% disodium phosphate, pH 7.0), and the adherent biofilm was fixed with 99% methanol for 10 min. After removing the methanol and air drying, 200 μl of a 0.1% crystal violet solution was added to each well. After incubating for 20 min, the crystal violet solution was removed, and the wells were washed in running tap water and air dried. The biofilm-staining dye was then solubilized in 200 μl of 30% acetic acid, and the OD540 of each well solution was measured using a plate reader (Multiskan EX; Thermo Scientific).

Measurement of exopolysaccharide weight.

Bacterial exopolysaccharide was purified from cell culture media by following a previously described method with modifications (20). Bacterial cells were grown for 3 days at 30°C in 10 ml of mannitol medium (0.2% yeast extract and 2% mannitol) containing rifampin. The bacterial cell cultures were rigorously vortexed and centrifuged at 2,300 × g for 10 min. After transferring the media to new tubes, phenol was added to the media at a final concentration of 10%. The phenol-mixed media were incubated at 4°C for 5 h and centrifuged at 9,100 × g for 15 min to collect the water phase solution. To the water phase solution, 4 volumes of isopropanol was added, and the mixture was incubated at 4°C overnight to precipitate the exopolysaccharide. The precipitated exopolysaccharide was pelleted by centrifugation at 9,100 × g for 15 min and suspended in distilled water. The exopolysaccharide suspension was lyophilized and subjected to a dry-weight measurement. The bacterial cells collected from the cell culture were also washed with distilled water three times and lyophilized to measure their dry weight. The exopolysaccharide production of the examined strain was calculated by dividing the exopolysaccharide weight by the cell dry weight.

Biofilm formation in flow cell imaging.

Burkholderia cells were grown overnight and diluted to an OD600 of 0.5 in YG medium containing rifampin, and 200 μl of the cell solution was injected into a flow cell chamber (2 mm by 2 mm by 50 mm). After 1 h of incubation at room temperature without flow for cell attachment, YG medium containing rifampin was allowed to flow into the flow cell at a rate of 200 μl/min. The flow continued for 90 h to develop biofilms in the flow cell at room temperature. The biofilm was then stained with 0.1% Syto9, a membrane-permeable fluorophore (Invitrogen), for 5 min and observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV10i; Olympus). A three-dimensional (3D) image of the biofilm was obtained using Bitplane Imaris 6.3.1 analysis software (magnification, ×20, with excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 mm and 498 nm, respectively).

Measurement of intracellular c-di-GMP concentrations.

The concentration of c-di-GMP was measured according to the previously published method using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS), with some modifications (21). Burkholderia cells were cultured in YG medium for 48 h, and 1 ml of the culture was subjected to a CFU assay to calculate the total cell numbers. The bacterial cells were harvested from 50 ml of the cell culture (OD600 = 6 to 8) at 2,300 × g for 15 min. The pellet was suspended in 1 ml of extraction solution (40% [vol/vol] acetonitrile, 40% [vol/vol] methanol, 0.1 N formic acid). The cell suspension was incubated overnight at −20°C and centrifuged at 9,100 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and dried by centrifugal evaporation under vacuum. After dissolving with 200 μl high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade water, c-di-GMP was detected and measured using ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometric detection (Acquity; Waters). Each sample (with a volume of 10 μl) was injected into an Acquity UPLC BEH column (1.7-μm particle size; 2.1 by 50 mm; Waters). Mobile phase solvent A consisted of 10 mM tributylamine and 15 mM acetic acid in water, and mobile phase solvent B consisted of 10 mM tributylamine in methanol. The following gradient conditions were applied to the sample-injected column at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min: 1% solvent B from 0 to 2.5 min, 1% to 20% solvent B from 2.5 to 7 min, 20% to 100% solvent B from 7 to 7.5 min, and 100% solvent B from 7.5 to 9 min. c-di-GMP was detected in the positive-ion multiple-reaction-monitoring mode at m/z 691 fragmented to m/z 152. The mass spectrometry parameters were as follows: capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; cone voltage, 50 V; collision energy, 38 V; source temperature, 110°C; desolvation temperature, 350°C; cone gas flow (nitrogen), 50 liters/h; desolvation gas flow (nitrogen), 800 liters/h; collision gas flow (argon), 0.45 ml/min; and multiplier voltage, 650 V. Commercially available synthetic c-di-GMP (Biolog) was used to identify c-di-GMP in the cell extracts based on (i) its elution time of 7.9 min, (ii) the identical mass of its protonated molecular ion ([M+H]+) (m/z = 691), and (iii) the identical MS-MS fragmentation pattern of the isolated precursor ions for the major components, with an m/z value of 152. Synthetic c-di-GMP was treated with the same extraction procedure as the bacterial cells, and concentrations of 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 nM c-di-GMP were used for LC–MS-MS to generate a standard curve for calculating the molar concentrations of c-di-GMP. The intracellular molar concentration of c-di-GMP was determined by dividing the molar amount of c-di-GMP of each sample by the volume of cells in the sample. The volume of cells was calculated by multiplying the cell number obtained from the CFU assay by the volume of a single Burkholderia cell, which was estimated to be 4.0 × 10−16 liter based on light microscope and transmission electron microscope images (14).

Estimation of the symbiont population by CFU assay.

Individual midgut fourth regions (M4) were dissected from R. pedestris and collected in 100 μl of PB. Each dissected M4 midgut was homogenized with a plastic pestle and serially diluted in PB. The diluted sample was spread on a rifampin-containing YG agar plate. After 2 days of incubation at 30°C, the colonies on the plates were counted, and the symbiont population per insect was calculated by multiplying the number of CFU by a dilution factor.

Measurements of insect growth and fitness.

Adult emergence was monitored by inspecting late-fifth-instar nymphs and counting the newly molted adult insects every day. Statistical analysis of the adult emergence data was performed using a z test for proportions. The equation of the z test is as follows: z = (P1P2)/[P(1 − P)(1/n1 + 1/n2)]0.5, where P1 and P2 are the proportions of adult insects in each group, P is the average proportion of the two samples, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes. On the second day after molting to an adult, the early-adult insects were anesthetized with CO2, and their body lengths were measured. After measuring the body lengths, the insects were immersed in acetone for 5 min and completely dried by incubating them in a 70°C oven, after which their dry body weights were measured.

Statistical analyses.

The statistical significance of the data was determined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test, provided in the Prism GraphPad software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A polysaccharide-based extracellular matrix in the lumen of the Burkholderia-harboring host midgut.

When ultrathin sections of the M4 midgut, the main symbiotic organ of R. pedestris, were observed by transmission electron microscopy, the lumen of the M4 crypts was found to be full of bacterial cells of the Burkholderia symbiont, whose interspace was occupied by an extracellular matrix (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, when semithin sections of the M4 midgut were stained with the PAS reagent, which stains polysaccharides (22), strong signals were detected in the lumen of the M4 crypts (Fig. 1B). When the content of the M4 midgut was diluted, smeared onto glass slides, and subjected to PAS staining, the symbiotic Burkholderia cells were instead found to be unstained (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), suggesting that the PAS-positive signal in the M4 lumen should be attributed to a polysaccharide-based extracellular matrix.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Observation of extracellular matrix in the lumen of the M4 midgut crypt. (A) Transmission electron microscope image of the M4 crypt of a fifth-instar nymph of R. pedestris. (B) Light microscope image of a semiultrathin section of the M4 crypt stained with PAS reagent. *, extracellular matrix occupying the interspace of symbiont cells; F, fold of a semiultrathin section (artifact); L, crypt lumen; T, crypt epithelial tissue.

Rationale for constructing Burkholderia mutant strains deficient in biofilm formation.

Plausibly, the extracellular matrix in the M4 lumen is produced by both the Burkholderia symbiont and the host intestinal epithelium and plays a biological role at the host-symbiont interface. To address this issue from the perspective of the symbiont, we attempted to generate Burkholderia mutant strains deficient in biofilm formation. First, we focused on homologs of genes involved in the synthesis and export of polysaccharides: the cellulose synthase gene bcsA, the exporter gene kpsT, the flippase gene bceQ, and the glycosyltransferase gene bceR (2326). Unfortunately, however, the ΔbscA mutant strain exhibited normal biofilm formation, and the ΔkpsT, ΔbceQ, and ΔbceR mutant strains could not be successfully produced, most likely because these mutations produced a lethal phenotype (data not shown). While we tried to find other candidates for the biofilm study, we have studied the purine biosynthesis-deficient mutants, the purL and purM strains (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), and found that these strains exhibit defects in biofilm formation that are independent of their auxotrophic growth (13). In other previous studies, purine nucleotide biosynthesis was shown to affect biofilm formation through the secondary messenger c-di-GMP, which plays a central role in the transition from a motile lifestyle to a biofilm lifestyle in Gram-negative bacteria (15, 18, 2729). c-di-GMP is synthesized by diguanylate cyclase (DGC) via the condensation of two GTPs, one of the final products of purine nucleotide biosynthesis (30). Also, previous studies suggested that DGC activity is affected by relatively small changes in the purine nucleotide concentration within the bacterial cells (1618). In addition, an anti-inflammatory drug used in the treatment of several autoimmune conditions, azathioprine, was suggested to prevent biofilm formation in E. coli through inhibition of c-di-GMP synthesis (16). These studies suggest that relatively low concentrations of purine nucleotide, which do not affect the primary role of transcription and translation, may affect biofilm production by regulating c-di-GMP synthesis. In the purine biosynthesis pathway (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), it was reported that both PurN and PurT are involved in the same step of purine biosynthesis, catalyzing the conversion of glycinamide ribonucleotide (GAR) to N-formylglycinamide ribonucleotide (FGAR) via independent pathways (Fig. 2) (31, 32), and only a purN and purT double mutant exhibits purine nucleotide auxotrophy (33). Therefore, we expected that by generating Burkholderia ΔpurT or ΔpurN single-mutant and ΔpurNT double-mutant strains we might be able to control intracellular purine nucleotide concentrations at low and different levels, thus allowing us to analyze their effects on biofilm formation in detail.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Reactions catalyzed by two GAR transformylases, PurN and PurT. In the third step of the de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis pathway (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), PurN uses 10-formyltetrahydrofolate, while PurT uses formate and ATP, to transfer the formyl group to GAR, thereby producing FGAR.

Generation and verification of the ΔpurN, ΔpurT, and ΔpurNT mutant strains.

After finding purN and purT gene sequences from the genome of Burkholderia RPE64 (11), we generated the ΔpurN and ΔpurT strains by disrupting the purN and purT genes of the Burkholderia symbiont by homologous recombination followed by allelic exchange. We also generated a ΔpurNT double-mutant strain to verify whether purN and purT are involved in the same step of purine biosynthesis. In both nutrient-rich YG medium and nutrient-poor minimal medium, the ΔpurN and ΔpurT strains exhibited almost the same growth rates as the wild-type strain (Fig. 3A and B). On the other hand, the ΔpurNT double mutant exhibited a lower growth rate in the YG medium and little growth in the minimal medium in comparison to the wild-type, ΔpurN, and ΔpurT strains (Fig. 3A and B). The growth defect of the ΔpurNT strain was somewhat restored by adding the purine derivative adenosine to the medium, and furthermore, complementation of theΔpurNT strain with the purN gene or the purT gene mostly restored the growth defect of the ΔpurNT strain in minimal medium (Fig. 3C and D), verifying that purN and purT are involved in the same step of purine biosynthesis. When we transformed the ΔpurN and ΔpurT mutant strains with pBBR122 plasmids carrying the functional purN and purT genes, respectively, the complemented strains showed much lower growth rates than the ΔpurN and ΔpurT strains, which may be due to the expense of harboring plasmids (Fig. 3A and B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Growth curves of the wild-type (WT) and mutant strains of the Burkholderia symbiont. (A and B) The growth rates of the wild-type, ΔpurN, ΔpurT, ΔpurN/purN, and ΔpurT/purT strains were measured in YG medium (A) and minimal medium (B). (C and D) The growth rates of the ΔpurNT strain; the ΔpurNT strain with 0.5 mM adenosine supplementation; and complemented strains of the ΔpurNT strain, the ΔpurNT/purN and ΔpurNT/purT strains, were measured in YG medium (C) and minimal medium (D). Means (n = 3) are shown. (Error bars showing standard deviations are too small to be visible.)

Biofilm formation defects in the ΔpurT mutant strain.

The wild-type and mutant Burkholderia strains were tested for the ability to form biofilms using three different assays. First, the strains were cultured for 2 days in 96-well plates, in which the biofilm formation was quantitatively analyzed by a crystal violet staining method (Fig. 4A). While the ΔpurN strain exhibited a level of biofilm formation similar to that of the wild-type strain, the ΔpurT strain exhibited a significantly lower level of biofilm formation. Second, we directly measured the weight of the exopolysaccharide produced by the wild-type and mutant Burkholderia strains. Because mannitol medium has been reported to induce the production of exopolysaccharide in Burkholderia cenocepacia (20), we cultured the strains in mannitol medium for 3 days and purified exopolysaccharide from the culturing media. The ΔpurT mutant strain produced significantly less exopolysaccharide than the wild-type and the ΔpurN mutant strains (Fig. 4B). Third, we examined the levels of biofilm formation by the wild-type and mutant Burkholderia strains in a flow cell system, which allowed microscopic observation of biofilm development of the bacterial cells under hydrodynamic conditions (34). While the wild type and the ΔpurN mutant strain developed a mushroom-like biofilm structure on the bacterial cells, the ΔpurT mutant strain did not form such a structure (Fig. 4C). The results of these three biofilm assays clearly demonstrate that the ΔpurT strain, but not the ΔpurN strain, exhibits a defect in biofilm formation.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Biofilm formation in the wild-type and mutant strains of the Burkholderia symbiont. (A) Microtiter plate biofilm assay. Quantification was done using a crystal violet staining method. Means and standard deviations (n = 8) are shown. Bars with different letters (a and b) indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups (P < 0.0001) determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple-comparison test. (B) Measurement of exopolysaccharide weight. Means and standard deviations (n = 3) are shown. Different letters (a and b) above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple-comparison test; P < 0.05). (C) Biofilm formation in flow cell imaging. The green fluorescent images indicate bacterial cells stained with Syto9. (D) Negative effect of the pBBR122 plasmid on biofilm formation. Biofilm formation was measured by microtiter biofilm assay using crystal violet staining. Means and standard deviations (n = 14) are shown. An unpaired t test was used to statistically evaluate the difference.

Low levels of c-di-GMP in the ΔpurT mutant strain.

To support our hypothesis that the differences in biofilm formation among the wild type and the ΔpurN and ΔpurT mutants may be due to the different levels of c-di-GMP, we measured the level of c-di-GMP in these cells using LC–MS-MS (35, 36). Synthetic c-di-GMP was used to estimate the intracellular concentrations of c-di-GMP in cell extracts from the Burkholderia strains (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). While the c-di-GMP concentration of the ΔpurN mutant was similar to that of the wild-type bacteria, the c-di-GMP concentration of the ΔpurT mutant was significantly lower than those of the wild type and ΔpurN bacteria (Fig. 5). These results suggest that the ΔpurT Burkholderia mutant strain becomes deficient in biofilm formation via suppression of the c-di-GMP level, as reported in previous studies of other bacterial systems (1618). To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that the activity of PurT, but not PurN, is critical for biofilm formation by affecting the level of c-di-GMP.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Quantification of the intracellular concentrations of c-di-GMP by LC–MS-MS. Means and standard errors (n = 5 for the wild-type, ΔpurN, and ΔpurT strains; n = 3 for the ΔpurN/purN and ΔpurT/purT strains) are shown. Bars with different letters (a, b, and c) indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups (P < 0.05), and bars with at least one letter the same indicate no significant differences between the experimental groups (P > 0.05) as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple-comparison test.

Unexpected suppression of biofilm formation in complemented ΔpurT/putT and ΔpurN/purN mutant strains.

Unexpectedly, the complemented ΔpurN/purN and ΔpurT/purT strains exhibited defects in biofilm formation (Fig. 4A to C). The plasmid containing a functional purT gene did not rescue the biofilm formation defect in the ΔpurT strain and, more unexpectedly, the plasmid containing a functional purN gene exhibited a rather suppressed level of biofilm formation in the ΔpurN strain (Fig. 4A to C). When we examined the c-di-GMP level of the complemented strains, the complemented ΔpurN/purN and ΔpurT/purT strains showed a higher level of c-di-GMP than the ΔpurN and ΔpurT mutant strains, respectively (Fig. 5). These results suggest that (i) complementation with the purT gene recovered the c-di-GMP level in the ΔpurT cells and (ii) the biofilm defects in the complemented strains are not related to their c-di-GMP levels. Therefore, we suspected that harboring the pBBR122 plasmid may negatively affect biofilm formation. As expected, when the wild-type strain was transformed with a blank pBBR122 plasmid, biofilm formation was significantly suppressed (Fig. 4D), indicating that the pBBR122 plasmid has a suppressive effect on biofilm formation when introduced into the Burkholderia symbiont strains.

A low population level of the ΔpurT mutant strain in the host M4 midgut.

Based on our in vitro results, we decided to use the wild-type, ΔpurN, and ΔpurT strains, without complemented strains, for the subsequent in vivo experiments to understand the possible role of biofilms in the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis. The wild-type and mutant Burkholderia strains were orally administered to second-instar R. pedestris nymphs, and the bacterial populations in the hosts' symbiotic midgut were monitored with CFU assays on the dissected symbiotic organs. Throughout the developmental course of the host insects, the populations of ΔpurN mutants were at levels similar to those of the wild-type strains (Fig. 6). Meanwhile, the populations of the ΔpurT strain were significantly lower than those of the wild type and the ΔpurN symbionts at the fifth-instar and adult stages (Fig. 6). These results indicate that the ΔpurT mutant strain exhibits a symbiosis defect, while the ΔpurN mutant strain does not.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Infection densities of the wild-type and the ΔpurN and ΔpurT mutant strains of the Burkholderia symbiont in the symbiotic midgut of the Riptortus host. Means and standard deviations (n = 20) are shown. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA with Tukey's correction); NS, not significant; ***, P < 0.0001).

Negative effects of the ΔpurT mutant strain on host growth and fitness.

We further examined the effect of the biofilm-defective ΔpurT symbiont on host growth and fitness. As a growth parameter, we measured the number of days required for the insects to enter the adult stage. The adult emergence rates of the ΔpurT symbiont-infected insects were significantly lower than those of the wild-type- or ΔpurN symbiont-infected insects (Fig. 7A). As fitness parameters, the body length and dry weight of early-adult insects were individually measured at time points of 2 days post-adult molting. While the body lengths showed no significant difference (Fig. 7B), the dry body weights of the ΔpurT symbiont-infected insects were significantly lower than those of the wild-type- and ΔpurN symbiont-infected insects (Fig. 7C). These results showed that the host insects infected with the ΔpurT strain tended to suffer impaired fitness consequences in comparison with the insects infected with the wild-type or ΔpurN strain.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Effects of the wild-type and the ΔpurN and ΔpurT mutant strains of the Burkholderia symbiont on fitness parameters of the Riptortus host. (A) Adult emergence rate. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between the ΔpurT mutant-infected group and the wild-type-infected group (z test; *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.0001). (B and C) Body length (B) and dry weight (C) of early adult insects. Means and standard errors (n = 74) are shown. Different letters (a and b) above the bars indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple-comparison test; P < 0.05).

The ΔpurT strain is a persistence mutant.

Ruby (37) conceptually classified symbiosis-defective mutants into three broad classes: initiation mutants, accommodation mutants, and persistence mutants. In our previous study on purine biosynthesis in the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis, the purL and purM genes were targeted to disrupt purine biosynthesis (13). PurL and PurM are known to be involved in the fourth and fifth steps of purine biosynthesis, respectively, as a sole enzyme, which is different from PurN and PurT, both involved in the third step of purine biosynthesis (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Therefore, both purL and purM single-mutant strains exhibit a purine-auxotropic phenotype in vitro and are revealed to be accommodation mutants in vivo, exhibiting a low infection density throughout the insect age (13). On the other hand, the ΔpurT mutant strain without an auxotrophic phenotype is able to reach a normal population in the host midgut while failing to maintain its population during the later stages of the symbiotic association (Fig. 6), and hence, the strain can be categorized as a persistence mutant. The in vivo symbiotic properties of the ΔpurT strain also show similarities to the previously identified persistent mutants, the PHA-deficient mutant phaC and phaB strains (14), in the decrease of the symbiont population in later stages of symbiosis and the level of delayed development and reduced host fitness.

Conclusion and perspective.

On the basis of these results, as well as our previous study (13), we have demonstrated that purine biosynthesis is important for biofilm formation in vitro and symbiotic association with the host in vivo. While purine biosynthesis is essential for fundamental cellular functions, such as replication and transcription, our findings reveal that the levels of purine biosynthesis may affect various biological phenomena, including biofilm formation and symbiosis, by way of complex metabolic networks, whose underlying mechanisms are currently poorly understood and deserve future detailed studies.

Clinically, bacterial biofilm formation is known to be involved in a variety of chronic pathogenic infections in humans and animals (38). Pathogenic bacteria living in the biofilm are protected against antimicrobial agents, such as antibiotics and host immune responses, thereby persisting continuously in their hosts (38, 39). Also, bacterial biofilm formation is known to play important biological roles, not only in pathogenic infections, but also in symbiotic associations (4045). In the nitrogen-fixing symbiotic associations between leguminous plants and Rhizobium-allied bacteria, the capability to form biofilms enables the bacteria to survive in the soil environment, as well as to attach to the host's root surface to establish the symbiotic association (40, 41). In the marine luminescent symbiotic associations between Euprymna squids and Vibrio fischeri, a capability for biofilm formation is required for the initial bacterial colonization of the nascent light organs of the juvenile host squids (4245). Our study using a purT mutant exhibiting normal growth but a defect in biofilm formation suggests that bacterial biofilm-forming ability may be also important for the Burkholderia symbiont to persist in the midgut of Riptortus to establish an insect-microbe symbiotic association.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mee Sung Lee and Jong Sung Jin at the Busan Center of the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) for analyzing c-di-GMP by LC–MS-MS.

This study was supported by a Global Research Laboratory (GRL) Grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant number 2011-0021535) to T.F. and B.L.L.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 9 May 2014

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00739-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Buchner P. 1965. Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baumann P, Moran NA. 1997. Non-cultivable microorganisms from symbiotic associations of insects and other hosts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 72:39–48. 10.1023/A:1000239108771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pontes MH, Dale C. 2006. Culture and manipulation of insect facultative symbionts. Trends Microbiol. 14:406–412. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kikuchi Y, Meng XY, Fukatsu T. 2005. Gut symbiotic bacteria of the genus Burkholderia in the broad-headed bugs Riptortus clavatus and Leptocorisa chinensis (Heteroptera: Alydidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:4035–4043. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4035-4043.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kikuchi Y, Fukatsu T. 2014. Live imaging of symbiosis: spatiotemporal infection dynamics of a GFP-labelled Burkholderia symbiont in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Mol. Ecol. 23:1445–1456. 10.1111/mec.12479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T. 2007. Insect-microbe mutualism without vertical transmission: a stinkbug acquires a beneficial gut symbiont from the environment every generation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4308–4316. 10.1128/AEM.00067-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T. 2011. An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J. 5:446–460. 10.1038/ismej.2010.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kikuchi Y, Yumoto I. 2013. Efficient colonization of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris by an environmentally transmitted Burkholderia symbiont. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:2088–2091. 10.1128/AEM.03299-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim JK, Han SH, Kim CH, Jo YH, Futahashi R, Kikuchi Y, Fukatsu T, Lee BL. 2014. Molting-associated suppression of symbiont population and up-regulation of antimicrobial activity in the midgut symbiotic organ of the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 43:10–14. 10.1016/j.dci.2013.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim JK, Kim NH, Jang HA, Kikuchi Y, Kim CH, Fukatsu T, Lee BL. 2013. Specific midgut region controlling the symbiont population in an insect-microbe gut symbiotic association. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:7229–7233. 10.1128/AEM.02152-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shibata TF, Maeda T, Nikoh N, Yamaguchi K, Oshima K, Hattori M, Nishiyama T, Hasebe M, Fukatsu T, Kikuchi Y, Shigenobu S. 2013. Complete genome sequence of Burkholderia sp. strain RPE64, bacterial symbiont of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Genome Announce. 1:e00441-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00441-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim JK, Lee HJ, Kikuchi Y, Kitagawa W, Nikoh N, Fukatsu T, Lee BL. 2013. Bacterial cell wall synthesis gene uppP is required for Burkholderia colonization of the stinkbug gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:4879–4886. 10.1128/AEM.01269-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim JK, Jang HA, Won YJ, Kikuchi Y, Heum Han S, Kim CH, Nikoh N, Fukatsu T, Lee BL. 2014. Purine biosynthesis-deficient Burkholderia mutants are incapable of symbiotic accommodation in the stinkbug. ISME J. 8:552–563. 10.1038/ismej.2013.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim JK, Won YJ, Nikoh N, Nakayama H, Han SH, Kikuchi Y, Rhee YH, Park HY, Kwon JY, Kurokawa K, Dohmae N, Fukatsu T, Lee BL. 2013. Polyester synthesis genes associated with stress resistance are involved in an insect-bacterium symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110:E2381–E2389. 10.1073/pnas.1303228110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cotter PA, Stibitz S. 2007. c-di-GMP-mediated regulation of virulence and biofilm formation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10:17–23. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Antoniani D, Rossi E, Rinaldo S, Bocci P, Lolicato M, Paiardini A, Raffaelli N, Cutruzzola F, Landini P. 2013. The immunosuppressive drug azathioprine inhibits biosynthesis of the bacterial signal molecule cyclic-di-GMP by interfering with intracellular nucleotide pool availability. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97:7325–7336. 10.1007/s00253-013-4875-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Monds RD, Newell PD, Wagner JC, Schwartzman JA, Lu W, Rabinowitz JD, O'Toole GA. 2010. Di-adenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) metabolism impacts biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens via modulation of c-di-GMP-dependent pathways. J. Bacteriol. 192:3011–3023. 10.1128/JB.01571-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ueda A, Wood TK. 2009. Connecting quorum sensing, c-di-GMP, pel polysaccharide, and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through tyrosine phosphatase TpbA (PA3885). PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000483. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T. 2011. Specific developmental window for establishment of an insect-microbe gut symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:4075–4081. 10.1128/AEM.00358-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chiarini L, Cescutti P, Drigo L, Impallomeni G, Herasimenka Y, Bevivino A, Dalmastri C, Tabacchioni S, Manno G, Zanetti F, Rizzo R. 2004. Exopolysaccharides produced by Burkholderia cenocepacia recA lineages IIIA and IIIB. J. Cyst. Fibros. 3:165–172. 10.1016/j.jcf.2004.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Massie JP, Reynolds EL, Koestler BJ, Cong JP, Agostoni M, Waters CM. 2012. Quantification of high-specificity cyclic diguanylate signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:12746–12751. 10.1073/pnas.1115663109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fulcher TP, Dart JK, McLaughlin-Borlace L, Howes R, Matheson M, Cree I. 2001. Demonstration of biofilm in infectious crystalline keratopathy using ruthenium red and electron microscopy. Ophthalmology 108:1088–1092. 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00561-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Solano C, Garcia B, Valle J, Berasain C, Ghigo JM, Gamazo C, Lasa I. 2002. Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose. Mol. Microbiol. 43:793–808. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02802.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zogaj X, Nimtz M, Rohde M, Bokranz W, Romling U. 2001. The multicellular morphotypes of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli produce cellulose as the second component of the extracellular matrix. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1452–1463. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02337.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pavelka MS, Jr, Hayes SF, Silver RP. 1994. Characterization of KpsT, the ATP-binding component of the ABC-transporter involved with the export of capsular polysialic acid in Escherichia coli K1. J. Biol. Chem. 269:20149–20158 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ferreira AS, Leitao JH, Silva IN, Pinheiro PF, Sousa SA, Ramos CG, Moreira LM. 2010. Distribution of cepacian biosynthesis genes among environmental and clinical Burkholderia strains and role of cepacian exopolysaccharide in resistance to stress conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:441–450. 10.1128/AEM.01828-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mills E, Pultz IS, Kulasekara HD, Miller SI. 2011. The bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP: mechanisms of signalling. Cell. Microbiol. 13:1122–1129. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01619.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sondermann H, Shikuma NJ, Yildiz FH. 2012. You've come a long way: c-di-GMP signaling. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15:140–146. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Steiner S, Lori C, Boehm A, Jenal U. 2013. Allosteric activation of exopolysaccharide synthesis through cyclic di-GMP-stimulated protein-protein interaction. EMBO J. 32:354–368. 10.1038/emboj.2012.315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tamayo R, Pratt JT, Camilli A. 2007. Roles of cyclic diguanylate in the regulation of bacterial pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61:131–148. 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nygaard P, Smith JM. 1993. Evidence for a novel glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:3591–3597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Y, Morar M, Ealick SE. 2008. Structural biology of the purine biosynthetic pathway. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65:3699–3724. 10.1007/s00018-008-8295-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Saxild HH, Jacobsen JH, Nygaard P. 1994. Genetic and physiological characterization of a formate-dependent 5′-phosphoribosyl-1-glycinamide transformylase activity in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 242:415–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sternberg C, Tolker-Nielsen T. 2006. Growing and analyzing biofilms in flow cells. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. Chapter 1:Unit 1B.2. 10.1002/9780471729259.mc01b02s00 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Newell PD, Yoshioka S, Hvorecny KL, Monds RD, O'Toole GA. 2011. Systematic analysis of diguanylate cyclases that promote biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1. J. Bacteriol. 193:4685–4698. 10.1128/JB.05483-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bobrov AG, Kirillina O, Ryjenkov DA, Waters CM, Price PA, Fetherston JD, Mack D, Goldman WE, Gomelsky M, Perry RD. 2011. Systematic analysis of cyclic di-GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Mol. Microbiol. 79:533–551. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ruby EG. 2008. Symbiotic conversations are revealed under genetic interrogation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6:752–762. 10.1038/nrmicro1958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Parsek MR, Singh PK. 2003. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:677–701. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Burmolle M, Thomsen TR, Fazli M, Dige I, Christensen L, Homoe P, Tvede M, Nyvad B, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Moser C, Kirketerp-Moller K, Johansen HK, Hoiby N, Jensen PO, Sorensen SJ, Bjarnsholt T. 2010. Biofilms in chronic infections—a matter of opportunity: monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59:324–336. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00714.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramey BE, Koutsoudis M, von Bodman SB, Fuqua C. 2004. Biofilm formation in plant-microbe associations. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7:602–609. 10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rinaudi LV, Giordano W. 2010. An integrated view of biofilm formation in rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 304:1–11. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01840.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nyholm SV, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2004. The winnowing: establishing the squid-vibrio symbiosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:632–642. 10.1038/nrmicro957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Visick KL. 2009. An intricate network of regulators controls biofilm formation and colonization by Vibrio fischeri. Mol. Microbiol. 74:782–789. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06899.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Visick KL, Ruby EG. 2006. Vibrio fischeri and its host: it takes two to tango. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9:632–638. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Morris AR, Visick KL. 2010. Control of biofilm formation and colonization in Vibrio fischeri: a role for partner switching? Environ. Microbiol. 12:2051–2059. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02269.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stabb EV, Ruby EG. 2002. RP4-based plasmids for conjugation between Escherichia coli and members of the Vibrionaceae. Methods Enzymol. 358:413–426. 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)58106-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schäfer A, Schwarzer A, Kalinowski J, Pühler A. 1994. Cloning and characterization of a DNA region encoding a stress-sensitive restriction system from Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 and analysis of its role in intergeneric conjugation with Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 176:7309–7319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Szpirer CY, Faelen M, Couturier M. 2001. Mobilization function of the pBHR1 plasmid, a derivative of the broad-host-range plasmid pBBR1. J. Bacteriol. 183:2101–2110. 10.1128/JB.183.6.2101-2110.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES