Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2014 Apr 15;7(5):2571–2578.

MTHFR A1298C and C677T gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to chronic myeloid leukemia in Egypt

Rabab M Aly 1, Mona M Taalab 2, Hayam F Ghazy 3
PMCID: PMC4069873  PMID: 24966971

Abstract

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme regulating the intracellular folate metabolism which plays an important role in carcinogenesis through DNA methylation. We aimed to evaluate the association between MTHFR A1298C and C677T polymorphisms and the risks of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Eighty-five patients with CML and a control group containing 100 healthy, age and sex matched individuals were examined for MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length (PCR-RFLP) method. The frequency of 677TT genotype in patients with CML was significantly higher compared to controls (OR = 2.513, 95% CI: 0.722-4.086, P = 0.025). No such association was shown for heterozygous 677CT (OR = 1.010, 95% CI: 0.460-2.218, P = 0.981). Moreover, for A1298C genotype, a statistically significant higher frequency of 1298CC was also detected in CML patients compared to control group (OR = 1.1816, 95% CI: 0.952-3.573, P = 0.036), 0.036). No such statistical significance was demonstrable for heterozygote 1298AC (OR = 1.046, 95% CI: 0.740-1.759, P = 0.092). In addition, patients with joint 677CT/1298AC or 677TT/1298CC genotypes showed an association with increased risk of CML (OR = 1.849, 95% CI: 0.935-2.540, P = 0.024; OR = 1.915, 95% CI: 1.202-3.845, P = 0.020 respectively). .A statistically significant increased risk of resistant to therapy was observed with 677CT and 1298AC genotypes (P = 0.001, P = 0.002 respectively). We conclude that both MTHFR 677TT and 1298CC polymorphisms have been associated with risk of CML and both 677CT and 1298AC genotypes are associated with higher risk of resistant to therapy.

Keywords: MTHFR, CML, polymorphism

Introduction

The etiology of most types of leukemia remains unknown. The established causes of leukemia such as ionizing radiation and cancer chemotherapy account for only a small percentage of the total cases [1,2]. Leukemias commonly arise as a result of DNA translocations, inversions, or deletions in genes regulating blood cell development or homeostasis. Folate deficiency has been implicated in increasing the risk of chromosomal aberrations because it is associated with uracil misincorporation into DNA. MTHFR is an enzyme gene located on the short arm of chromosome 1 at 1p36.3. The cDNA sequence of this gene is 2.2kb long and is composed of 11 exons (103 to 432 bp) [3]. It is a key enzyme in folate and homocysteine (Hcy) metabolism which catalyzes the reduction of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methylenetetrahydrofolate, the predominant circulatory form of folate and carbon donor for the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine [4].

There are two common genetic polymorphisms that have been shown to decrease the activity of MTHFR, which are the C677T mutation at codon 222, and the A1298C mutation at codon 429. Hyperhomocysteinemia is a consequence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MTHFR 677 C>T that can cause homocysteine levels in the blood to increase, usually exceeding 15 μmol/L. MTHFR 677 C>T is the result of a missense mutation occurring at position 222, where alanine is substituted with valine. The mutation results in a thermolabile MTHFR that has lower enzyme activity at 37°C, leading to increased total plasma homocysteine [5].

The C677T polymorphism occurs in exon 4 and results in an alanine-to-valine substitution at codon 222. The polymorphism lies at the base of the binding site for the MTHFR cofactor, flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) [6]. Individuals with the MTHFR C677T TT genotype have been shown to have 30 percent in vitro MTHFR enzyme activity compared with the wild type, whereas those with the heterozygous (CT) genotype have been found to have 60 percent wild-type MTHFR enzyme activity [7]. A1298C in exon 7, results in a glutamate-to-alanine substitution at codon 429. A1298C polymorphism leads to diminished enzyme activity and the allele frequencies up to 33% have been reported previously for this polymorphism [8,9]. Thus, different leukemias are most likely the result of an adverse gene environment interaction, with susceptibility being related to polymorphisms in multiple genes. Two MTHFR polymorphisms, C677T and A1298C, have been associated with reduced enzyme activity.

CML is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy that is characterized by translocation between chromosomes 22 and 9 drives the leukemic changes in CML [10]. Although the t [9,22] translocation is the primary cause, findings of recent studies suggest that single nucleotide polymorphisms in various critical genes may affect the risk of CML. Examples for polymorphic genes associated with increased risk for CML include the MTHFR (A1298C) [11], FLT3 (D324N) [12], NQO1 [13], and p53 (codon 72) [14].

Several studies have been completed regarding the correlation between the presence of C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene and the risk of different leukemias that mostly indicate a lower risk of acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) in people possessing 677TT variant [4,15]. However, the findings about this correlation in other acute and chronic leukemias are controversial [16,17]. In the present study, we investigated whether C677T and A1298C polymorphisms might affect the risk for CML.

Materials and methods

Study population

This study consisted of blood or bone marrow samples 85 adult CML outpatients of both genders, who were diagnosed by RT-PCR and immunophenotyping. Patients were treated in hematology Oncology Centre, Mansoura, Egypt. The control group consisted of 100 healthy volunteers of both genders. All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Mansoura School of Medicine. Written informed consent was obtained from all registered volunteers.

MTHFR genotyping

DNA from patients and controls was extracted from peripheral blood samples collected in EDTA tubes using the DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification of the C677T region was performed using the forward primer: 5-TGAAGGAGAAGGTGTCTGCGGGA-3 and the reverse primer: 5 AGGACGGTGCGGTGAGAGTG-3. Amplification of the A1298C region was performed using; forward primer 5-GCA AGT CCC CCA AGG AGG-3 and reverse primer 5-GGT CCC CAC TTC CAG CAT C-3. Each PCR reaction of 25 μL contains the components: 10 Mm Tris HCL, 1.5 Mm MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 1U Taq polymerase, 400 uM dNTP and 0.5 mM primer. Samples were amplified using the following PCR conditions: 5 min of initial denaturation at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 60 sec, and 72°C for 60 sec, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The amplified PCR products of C677T and A1298C were separately digested with HinfI and MboII restriction enzymes (New England Biolabs, USA), respectively. After digestion, products were subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose. The digestion fragment sizes for C677T genotypes were: a single 198 bp band for CC, 198, 175 and 23 bp for CT, and 175 bp and 23 bp for TT. Digestion of PCR product with MboII for 1298AA genotype produces fragments of 72, 37, and 28 bp, whereas mutant CC genotype generates fragments of 100 and 28 bp, and heterozygous AC genotype produces fragments of 100, 72, and 28 bp.

Statistical analysis

Allele frequencies were tested from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) before analysis. Qualitative data were presented as frequency and percentage. Chi square test was used to compare groups. Quantitative data were presented as mean and standard deviation. For comparison between groups; ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis (for non-parametric data) were used. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression, and were given within 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kaplan-Meier test was used for survival analysis and the statistical significance of differences among curves was determined by Log-Rank test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS (statistical package for social science) program (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL) version 16.

Results

Table 1 shows that there was no statistical difference for age when compared CML patients with C677T and A1298C genotypes to control subjects.

Table 1.

Age distribution according to C677T and A1298C genotypes

Polymorphism CML (n = 85) Control (n = 100)

No. Mean SD P * No. Mean SD
Total 85 46.69 12.717 0.500 100 48.22 11.870
C677T CC 30 45.85 14.479 0.592 45 47.51 13.600
CT 44 48.87 11.868 0.097 49 39.71 14.496
TT 11 38.00 14.259 0.937 6 42.00 19.519
A1298C AA 32 45.00 16.820 0.917 40 44.50 14.787
AC 38 48.13 11.071 0.294 51 45.00 14.365
CC 15 42.50 15.175 0.418 9 37.07 15.633

P: Significance between AML versus control group.

*

Significance between CML versus control group.

Table 2 shows no significant difference between the control and CML groups for sex as there was no difference for sex distribution in respect to C677T and A1298C between CML patients and control subjects. Moreover, no statistical differences between males and females in respect to both C677T and A1298C genotypes versus each other.

Table 2.

Sex distribution according to C677T and A1298C genotypes

Polymorphism Case Control

Total Male (n = 40) Female (n = 45) Total Male (n = 49) Female (n = 51) P


No % No % No % No %

C677T CC 30 14 46.6 16 53.3 45 23 51.1 22 48.8 0.592
CT 44 20 45.4 24 54.5 49 23 46.9 26 53.0 0.531
TT 11 6 54.5 5 45.4 6 3 50.0 3 50.0 0.486
p 0.379 P 0.820

Male (n = 37) Female (n = 48) Male (n = 50) Female (n = 50)


No % No % No % No %

A1298C AA 32 17 53.1 15 46.8 40 16 40 24 60.0 0.149
AC 38 16 42.1 22 57.8 51 29 56.8 22 43.1 0.215
CC 15 4 26.6 11 73.3 9 5 55.5 4 44.4 0.380
p 0.310 p 0.206

Table 3 shows no correlations between patients or control subjects and various laboratory parameters as there was no statistical difference for Hemoglobin level, Total leukocyte and platelet counts in respect to C677T and A1297C genotypes among patients with CML and control subjects.

Table 3.

Association between patients’ laboratory findings and MTHFR genotypes

Geno type CML (n = 85) p Contro (n = 100) p


No. Mean SD No. Mean SD
C677T TLC (×109/L) Total 85 68.1747 77.71733 100 7.70 2.24
CC 30 83.4408 97.22829 0.266 45 7.918 2.30 0.301
CT 44 42.1200 24.75076 49 7.50 2.17
TT 11 66.6500 39.14916 6 6.00 1.00
Hemoglobin (g/dL) Total 85 10.4533 1.77221 100 13.4750 .87359
CC 30 10.5077 1.70972 0.294 45 13.4265 .90341 0.669
CT 44 10.7067 1.74088 49 13.5179 .84110
TT 11 9.1500 2.22486 6 13.8667 .83267
Platelet count (×109/L) Total 85 1.90.11 154.79 100 299.95 76.82
CC 30 179.16 151.66 0.786 45 297.73 77.33 0.636
CT 44 179.55 91.71 49 307.54 78.15
TT 11 300.90 320.24 6 265.33 66.34
A1298C TLC (×109/L) Total 85 68.1747 77.71733 100 7.7000 2.23550
AA 32 77.8786 126.42145 0.586 40 8.3125 2.22069 0.122
AC 38 56.4783 34.02699 51 7.3824 2.13222
CC 15 84.8200 60.75070 9 7.0714 2.33582
Hemoglobin (g/dL) Total 85 10.4533 1.77221 100 13.4750 0.87
AA 32 11.0429 1.26291 0.058 40 13.3219 0.79 0.313
AC 38 10.5304 1.81094 51 13.5088 0.97
CC 15 9.2000 1.99069 9 13.7429 0.78
Platelet count (×109/L) Total 85 190.11 154.79 0.522 100 299.95 76.82 0.344
AA 32 153.86 99.48 40 315.38 61.89
AC 38 214.27 147.79 51 288.97 85.24
CC 15 184.10 242.89 9 291.36 85.45

Table 4 shows distribution of C677T and A1298C genotypes and alleles in CML patients and control group. The frequency of the MTHFR 677CC genotype was higher among controls (45.0%) when compared to CML patients (35.2%). In addition, for CML patients, the frequency of the 677CT genotype (51.7%) was higher than control group (49.0%) but with no statistical significance (P = 0.981). However, the frequency of C677T TT genotype was significantly higher (OR = 2.513, 95% CI: 0.722-4.086, P = 0.025) among cases (12.9%) when compared to control group (6.0%), while in MTHFR A1298C genotypes, the frequencies of control subjects who were carrying 1298AA genotype (40.0%) and the heterozygous MTHFR 1298AC genotype (51.0%) were higher among controls compared to CML patients, which were (37.6%) and (44.7%), respectively. In addition, the frequency of individuals who were carrying the 1298CC polymorphisms was significantly higher (OR = 1.1816, 95% CI: 0.952-3.573, P = 0.036), 0.036) in CML patients (17.6%) when compared to controls (9.0%). When considering the combined effect of the two polymorphisms, 677CT/1298AC genotype (OR = 1.849, 95% CI: 0.935-2.540, P = 0.024) and 677TT/1298CC genotype (OR = 1.915, 95% CI: 1.202-3.845, P = 0.020) showed an association with increased risk of CML.

Table 4.

C677T and A1298C genotypes and risk of CML

Polymorphism Cases (N = 85) Control (N = 100) OR 95% CI P

N. % N. %
C677T Genotype CC 30 35.2 45 45.0 1 - - -
CT 44 51.7 49 49.0 1.010 0.460 2.218 0.981
TT 11 12.9 6 6.0 2.513 0.722 4.086 0.025
Allele C 64 75.9 75 75.0 0.786 0.429 1.442 0.436
T 21 24.7 25 25.0
A1298C Genotype AA 32 37.6 40 40.0 1 - - -
AC 38 44.7 51 51.0 1.046 0.740 1.759 0.092
CC 15 17.6 9 9.0 1.816 0.952 3.573 0.036
Allele A 56 65.8 68 68.0 0.827 0.490 1.398 0.478
C 29 34.1 32 32.0
C677T/A1298C CC/AA 11 12.9 36 36.0 0.470 0.264 0.738 0.562
CC/AC 14 16.4 19 19.0 1.258 0.547 1.052 0.937
CC/CC 10 11.7 5 5.0 0.694 0.452 0.939 0.583
CT/AA 18 21.1 13 13.0 1.050 0.853 2.059 0.459
CT/AC 26 30.5 24 24.0 1.849 0.935 2.540 0.024
TT/AA 4 4.7 2 2.0 1.204 0.895 1.630 0.095
TT/CC 2 2.3 1 1.0 1.915 1.202 3.845 0.020

Table 5 shows that there was a significant difference in CML phase’s distribution among patients according to C677T and A1298C genotypes. Higher trend of chronic phase was present among cases with 766CC genotype but higher frequency of blastic crises was present in cases with 677CT genotype. In addition, Patients with 1298AA genotype showed higher trend of chronic phase but cases with 1298AC genotype showed higher trend toward blastic crises. There was a statistically significantly trend toward increased risk of resistant to therapy with 677CT and 1298AC genotype who were associated with worse response to therapy (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively).

Table 5.

Clinical characteristics of CML patients according to MTHFR genotypes

Groups Total C677T P A1298C P


CC CT TT AA AC CC


No % No % No % No % No % No %
Total 85 30 35.2 44 51.7 11 12.9 32 37.6 38 44.7 15 17.6
Phases
    Chronic 60 26 43.3 25 41.6 9 15.0 0.037 27 45.0 20 33.3 13 21.6 0.049
    Accelerated 16 3 18.7 11 68.7 2 12.5 3 18.7 12 75.0 1 6.2
    Blastic 9 1 11.1 8 88.8 0 0.0 2 22.2 6 66.6 1 11.1
Therapy
    Response 35 25 71.4 9 25.7 1 2.8 0.001 20 57.1 13 37.1 2 5.7 0.002
    Resistant 50 5 10.0 35 70.0 10 20.0 12 24.0 25 50.0 13 26.0

Discussion

Leukemias are clonal diseases which commonly arise as a result of genetic damage deregulating blood cell development. The risk of leukemia may be increased by both quantitative and qualitative changes in folate metabolism [11]. Folate metabolism plays an important role in carcinogenesis due to its involvement in DNA methylation by 5-methyl THF [18]. 5, 10-MTHFR catalyzes the irreversible reduction of 5-10-methylen THF to 5-methyl THF [19]. MTHFR activity plays an important role in DNA synthesis and its reduced activity has been associated with abnormal DNA synthesis and repair, chromosomal instability, and alterations of the key pathway of the methylation resulting in an increased cancer risk [20]. The association of MTHFR variants with an increased or decreased risk for different neoplasia was reported in several studies [21]. The variant MTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles have been associated with increased plasma homocysteine levels [22-24], decreased risk of certain cancers, especially acute leukemias [25] and colorectal cancer [26,27]. We were therefore interested to establish the distribution and risk association of the two most common polymorphisms, MTHFR A1298C and MTHFR C677T in CML.

In our study, 6.0% of the control samples had a mutant homozygous MTHFR 677TT genotype, and the frequency of allele T was 25.0%. The 677T allele of the MTHFR gene polymorphisms showed remarkable ethnic and geographical variation. In a previous study, 677T allele varied from 26.6% to 46% in Italy and 25.7% in the Middle East to 44.2% in northern China [28]. Moreover, other studies showed that the homozygous 677TT genotype occurred in approximately 10% to 15% of Caucasian and Asian populations [29] and approximately 5% to 10% of Caucasians carry the 1298CC genotype [3]. In addition, we found that 9.0% of the control samples had a mutant homozygous 1298CC genotype, and the frequency of allele C was 32.0%. Such a high frequency for the A1298C allele had already been reported among the Lebanese and the Iranian population [19,30]. However, our finding seemed to contradict other studies which had lower frequencies of A1298CC genotype among control samples [16,31,32].

Many studies have been performed to identify genetic variants associated with CML susceptibility, and among them are MTHFR [11,13], glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) [16,13], and haptoglobin (Hp) gene polymorphisms [33,34]. Association studies between the MTHFR polymorphisms C677T and A1298C and risk of CML have been carried out in different populations, but several of them had conflicting results. Our study showed a statistically significant association between both of the two common MTHFR gene polymorphisms, C677T and A1298C, and the risk of CML. The association was most clear in cases of the homozygous mutant 677TT and 1298CC genotypes. Two recent studies reported inconsistent results. Barbosa and his colleagues did not find any significant association between both MTHFR polymorphisms and CML [16], while Robin et al. who investigated the relationship between MTHFR polymorphisms and the risk of relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation for CML, observed a decrease in the relapse risk of patients with variants of both MTHFR polymorphisms [17]. A previous study by Moon and his colleagues found that MTHFR 1298CC genotype was strongly associated with the risk of CML in the Korean population, while the 677TT allele did not affect the risk of CML [32].

Our results demonstrated risk association between MTHFR 677TT and CML. In agreement with our findings, previous studies found a significant association between C766TT genotype and CML risk [35,36]. However, there are other studies that show contradictory results to our study as they reported that the C677T variants had no effect on CML patients [11,31,32,35]. In accordance to our study, other studies reported a statistically significant association between 1298CC gene polymorphism and the risk of CML [32,36]. But Lordelo et al observed that the MTHFR 1298AA genotype was linked to significantly increased risk of developing CML, while 1298AC significantly decreased this risk [31]. A study that came from South Korea reported inconsistent results specifically regarding the A1298C polymorphisms where the investigators observed a protective effect for the mutated heterozygous genotype 1298AC [11].

In our study, MTHFR A1298C showed no significant difference between the control and CML groups for age and gender. This is in contrast to a previous study by Lordelo et al. who observed different findings in his study as he found that the 1298AA genotype frequency was higher in the CML group and the genotypes containing the variant allele (AC and CC) predominated in the control and also showed significant difference between the control and CML groups for age [31].

The combination of heterozygosis of both polymorphisms of MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) leads to features similar to those observed in homozygotes 677TT, and has been associated with reduced enzyme activity, decreased plasma folate levels and hyperhomocysteinemia [9,37]. Our study showed that individuals with combined 677CT/1298AC or 677TT/1298CC genotypes were associated with risk of CML. However, Robin et al suggested that individuals with the 677CC/1298AA genotype were at high risk of relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation [17]. Studies on MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphism have yielded inconsistence results that could result from the small sample number and in other cases, including this report; this might stress the existence of an element of ethnic variability.

Most of the studies that investigated the relationship between MTHFR gene polymorphisms and leukemias have not assessed the dietary folate intake, so the effect of folate level has not been completely clarified yet [19]. It was previously reported that MTHFR enzyme activity was not the only effective factor in folate metabolism pathways and the intake of several elements in a nutrient diet, such as vitamins B6 and B12, can influence the folate metabolism. Flavin adenine dinucleotide as MTHFR co-factor is a form of vitamin B riboflavin, and it has been suggested that the riboflavin status may play a role in the optimal function of the MTHFR enzyme [3].

In conclusion, the present study showed an association between MTHFR polymorphisms (677TT, 1298CC) and risk of developing CML. In addition C677T and A1298C carriers might be at risk of resistance to therapy in CML but further studies on larger samples with assessment of folate situation is necessary before absolute judgment about the role of MTHFR polymorphisms in the development of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Declaration of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Greaves MF. Lancet. 1997;349:344–49. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09412-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith MT, Zhang L. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;4:937–46. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s4937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Robien K, Ulrich CM. 5, 10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphisms and Leukemia Risk: A HuGE Minireview. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:571–82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Skibola CF, Smith MT, Kane E, Roman E, Rollinson S, Cartwright RA, Morgan G. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:12810–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scher AI, Terwindt GM, Verschuren WMM, Kruit MC, Blom HJ, Kowa H, Frants RR, van den Maagdenberg AM, van Buchem M, Ferrari MD, Launer LJ. Migraine and MTHFR C677T genotype in a population-based sample. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:372–75. doi: 10.1002/ana.20755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guenther BD, Sheppard CA, Tran P, Rozen R, Matthews RG, Ludwig ML. The structure and properties of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli suggest how folate ameliorates human hyperhomocysteinemia. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:359–65. doi: 10.1038/7594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, Boers GJ, den Heijer M, Kluijtmans LA, van den Heuvel LP. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet. 1995;10:111–13. doi: 10.1038/ng0595-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weisberg I, Tran P, Christensen B, Sibani S, Rozen R. A second genetic polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) associated with decreased enzyme activity. Mol Genet Metab. 1998;64:169–72. doi: 10.1006/mgme.1998.2714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Van der Put NM, Gabreels F, Stevens EM, Smeitink JA, Trijbels FJ, Eskes TK, van den Heuvel LP, Blom HJ. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: an additional risk factor for neural-tube defects. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1044–51. doi: 10.1086/301825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karakosta A, Golias Ch, Charalabopoulos A, Peschos D, Batistatou A, Charalabopoulos K. Genetic models of human cancer as a multistep process. Paradigm models of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and chronic myelogenous and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005;24:505–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hur M, Park JY, Cho HC, Lee KM, Shin HY, Cho HI. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C genotypes are associated with the risks of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and chronic myelogenous leukaemia in the Korean population. Clin Lab Haematol. 2006;28:154–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schnittger S, Kohl TM, Leopold N, Schoch C, Wichmann HE, Kern W, Lohse P, Hiddemann W, Haferlach T, Spiekermann K. D324N single-nucleotide polymorphism in the FLT3 gene is associated with higher risk of myeloid leukemias. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006;45:332–37. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hishida A, Terakura S, Emi N, Yamamoto K, Murata M, Nishio K, Sekido Y, Niwa T, Hamajima N, Naoe T. GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions, NQO1 C609T polymorphism and risk of chronic myelogenous leukemia in Japanese. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2005;6:251–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bergamaschi G, Merante S, Orlandi E, Galli A, Bernasconi P, Cazzola M. TP53 codon 72 polymorphism in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2004;89:868–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Franco RF, Simoes BP, Tone LG, Gabellini SM, Zago MA, Falcão RP. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene polymorphism decreases the risk of childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:616–18. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barbosa CG, Souza CL, Neto JPM, Arruda MGB, Barreto JH, Reis MG, Goncalves MS. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms in myeloid leukemia patients from Northeastern Brazil. Genet and Mol Biol. 2008;31:29–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Robien K, Ulrich CM, Bigler J, Yasui Y, Gooley T, Bruemmer B, Potter JD, Radich JP. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype affects risk of relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7592–98. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang S. Histone methyltransferases, diet nutrients and tumor suppressors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:469–76. doi: 10.1038/nrc819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vahid P, Farnaz R, Zaker F, Farzaneh A, Parisa R. Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase gene polymorphisms and risk of Myeloid Leukemia. Lab Med. 2010;41:490–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, Ulrich CM, Cardon LR, Peters U. Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. JAMA. 2008;299:2423–36. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.20.2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nuckel H, Frey UH, Durig J, Duhrsen U, Siffert W. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene 677C4T and 1298A4C polymorphisms are associated with differential apoptosis of leukemic B cells in vitro and disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2004;18:1816–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lievers KJ, Boers GH, Verhoef P, den Heijer M, Kluijtmans LA, van der Put NM, Trijbels FJ, Blom HJ. A second common variant in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and its relationship to MTHFR enzyme activity, homocysteine, and cardiovascular disease risk. J Mol Med. 2001;79:522–8. doi: 10.1007/s001090100253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Friedman G, Goldschmidt N, Friedlander Y, Ben-Yehuda A, Selhub J, Babaey S, Mendel M, Kidron M, Bar-On H. A common mutation A1298C in human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: association with plasma total homocysteine and folate concentrations. J Nutr. 1999;129:1656–61. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.9.1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fodinger M, Buchmayer H, Heinz G, Papagiannopoulos M, Kletzmayr J, Perschl A, Vychytil A, Hörl WH, Sunder-Plassmann G. Association of two MTHFR polymorphisms with total homocysteine plasma levels in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:77–84. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.25197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wiemels JL, Smith RN, Taylor GM, Eden OB, Alexander FE, Greaves MF. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and risk of molecularly defined subtypes of childhood acute leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4004–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061408298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Keku T, Millikan R, Worley K, Winkel S, Eaton A, Biscocho L, Martin C, Sandler R. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase codon 677 and 1298 polymorphisms and colon cancer in African Americans and whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11:1611–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Curtin K, Bigler J, Slattery ML, Caan B, Potter JD, Ulrich CM. MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms: diet, estrogen, and risk of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:285–92. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-03-0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilcken B, Bamforth F, Li Z, Zhu H, Ritvanen A, Renlund M, Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Czeizel AE, Gelman-Kohan Z, Scarano G, Bianca S, Ettore G, Tenconi R, Bellato S, Scala I, Mutchinick OM, López MA, de Walle H, Hofstra R, Joutchenko L, Kavteladze L, Bermejo E, Martínez-Frías ML, Gallagher M, Erickson JD, Vollset SE, Mastroiacovo P, Andria G, Botto LD. Geographical and ethnic variation of the 677C-T allele of 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): Findings from over 7000 newborns from 16 areas worldwide. J Med Genet. 2003;40:619–25. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.8.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Botto LD, Yang Q. 5, 10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:862–77. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sabbagh AS, Mahfoud Z, Taher A, Zaatari G, Daher R, Mahfouz RA. High prevalence of MTHFR gene A1298C polymorphism in Lebanon. Genet Test. 2008;12:75–80. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lordelo GS, Miranda-Vilela AL, Akimoto AK, Alves PC, Hiragi CO, Nonino A, Daldegan MB, Klautau-Guimarães MN, Grisolia CK. Association between methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase and glutathione S-transferase M1 gene polymorphisms and chronic myeloid leukemia in a Brazilian population. Genet Mol Res. 2012;1:1013–26. doi: 10.4238/2012.April.19.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moon HW, Kim TY, Oh BR, Min HC, Cho HI, Bang SM, Lee JH, Yoon SS, Lee DS. MTHFR 677CC/1298CC genotypes are highly associated with chronic myelogenous leukemia: a case-control study in Korea. Leuk Res. 2007;31:1213–17. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nevo S, Tatarsky I. Serum haptoglobin types and leukemia. Hum Genet. 1986;73:240–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00401236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Campregher PV, Lorand-Metze I, Grotto HZW, Sonati MF. Haptoglobin phenotypes in Brazilian patients with leukemia. Braz J Pathol Lab Med. 2004;40:307–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jakovljevic K, Malisic E, Cavic M, Radulovic S, Jankovic R. Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism C677T and risk of chronic myeloid leukemia in Serbian population. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53:1327–30. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.645210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ismail SI, Ababneh NA, Awidi A. Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) Genotype Association with the Risk of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. J Med J. 2009;43:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miranda-Vilela AL. Role of polymorphisms in factor V (FV Leiden), prothrombin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) genes as risk factors for thrombophilias. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2012;12:997–06. doi: 10.2174/138955712802762338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES