Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2014 May 27;2014:361329. doi: 10.1155/2014/361329

18F-Labeling Using Click Cycloadditions

Kathrin Kettenbach 1, Hanno Schieferstein 1, Tobias L Ross 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4070495  PMID: 25003110

Abstract

Due to expanding applications of positron emission tomography (PET) there is a demand for developing new techniques to introduce fluorine-18 (t 1/2 = 109.8 min). Considering that most novel PET tracers are sensitive biomolecules and that direct introduction of fluorine-18 often needs harsh conditions, the insertion of 18F in those molecules poses an exceeding challenge. Two major challenges during 18F-labeling are a regioselective introduction and a fast and high yielding way under mild conditions. Furthermore, attention has to be paid to functionalities, which are usually present in complex structures of the target molecule. The Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) and several copper-free click reactions represent such methods for radiolabeling of sensitive molecules under the above-mentioned criteria. This minireview will provide a quick overview about the development of novel 18F-labeled prosthetic groups for click cycloadditions and will summarize recent trends in copper-catalyzed and copper-free click 18F-cycloadditions.

1. Introduction

For the application in positron emission tomography (PET) [1], fluorine-18 provides ideal nuclear physical characteristics for in vivo imaging. Fluorine-18 offers a half-life of 110 min, a β +-branch of 97%, and especially a low β +-energy of 635 keV, which is responsible for a very high spatial resolution [2]. The challenges for researchers are to develop convenient 18F-labeling strategies, which include short reaction times and applicability for sensitive biomolecules. Especially the harsh conditions during direct 18F-labeling pose an exceeding challenge [3, 4]. Therefore, most of the radiolabeling strategies focus on 18F-containing prosthetic groups, which allow a sensitive and bioorthogonal 18F-labeling to treat the multitude of functional groups in those bioactive compounds with respect.

The most established method, which fulfills all mentioned criteria, is given by click reactions. Especially the Cu(I)-catalyzed variant of the Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of terminal alkynes and azides offers a very powerful reaction with high specificity and excellent yields under mild conditions [5]. As a result, numerous PET tracers have been synthesized using CuAAC in a widespread spectrum of structural varieties of the prosthetic group within the last decade. One of the latest investigations deals with a polar clickable amino acid-based prosthetic group to further improve the pharmacokinetic properties of radiotracers, particularly suitable for peptides and proteins [6].

However, the need of cytotoxic copper during CuAAC has led to the necessity of alternative fast and copper-free click reaction strategies for radiofluorination and additionally enabling pretargeting approaches in living systems. Those so-called strain-promoted click reactions can be carried out between cyclooctyne derivatives and azides (strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition, SPAAC) [713] or tetrazines (tetrazine-trans-cyclooctyne (TTCO) ligation) [1417] as well as between norbornene derivatives and tetrazines [18]. Especially, the TTCO ligation showed promising reaction rates, which makes this click reaction concept very suitable for 18F-labeling and also for in vivo application in living systems. Very recently, new versions of 18F-click cycloadditions are added to the range of reactions [1925]. In this line, the first 18F-labeled β-lactame became available via a new radio-Kinugasa reaction [21].

As a consequence, click cycloaddition is one of the most frequently applied methods for 18F-labeling of new bioactive compounds, with or without a catalytic system. This can be impressively illustrated by the fact that over 50 original papers have been published in this research area within the last eight years.

Tables 13 give an overview of the 18F-prosthetic groups, the reaction conditions and reaction partners applied for copper-catalyzed, copper-free and other kinds of 18F-click cycloadditions, respectively. The most important structures of those prosthetic groups are shown in Figures 1, 3, and 5.

Table 1.

Summary of the prosthetic groups, reaction conditions, and reaction partners applied for copper-catalyzed click 18F-fluorination.

18F-prosthetic group Steps/reaction time1 RCY2 Reacting agent Catalytic system Overall reaction time1
(CCA)
RCY2
CCA
Literature
[18 F] fluoroalkynes 1 step, 10 min 36–81% N-(3-azidopropionyl) peptides CuI/NaAsc/DIPEA 30 min 54–99% [26]
4-[18F]fluoro-1-butyne 1 step, 15 min (estimated) n.d. Glucopyranosyl azide 75–80 min 30% [27]
4-[18F]Fluoro-1-butyne 1 step, 15 min 45 ± 3% 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-glucopyranosyl azide Cu(I)/Asc/2,6-lutidine 30 min 27 ± 6% [28]
5-[18F]fluoro-1-pentyne 1 step, 15 min 59 ± 6% 52 ± 5%
1 step, 22 min 86 ± 2% α V β 6 specific peptide A20FMDV2 azide CuI/Asc 66 min 8.7 ± 2.3% [29]
6-[18F]fluoro-1-hexyne 1 step, 12 min 70–85% γ-(4-azido-butyl)-folic acid amide CuI 1.5 h 25–35% [30]

[18 F] fluoroethyl azide ([ 18 F] FEA) 1 step, 15 min 55% Terminal alkynes Excess of Cu2+/Asc or copper powder 1 h 61–98% respectively
15–98% with copper powder
[31]
[32]
n.d. Caspase 3/7 Selective Isatin CuSO4/Asc n.d. 65 ± 6% [33]
RGD peptides Cu2+/Asc 47 ± 8% [34]
3-Cyanoquinoline core 3 h 37 ± 3.6% [35]
Apoptosis marker ICMT11 CuSO4/Asc/BPDS n.d. 1–3.4% n.d.c. [36]
5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine CuI/ascorbic acid/DIPEA 75 ± 10% [37]
[Tyr3]octreotate analogues CuSO4/Asc/BPDS 30 min (estimated) 40–64% [38]
ICMT-11 (automated synthesis) 90 min 3 ± 2.6% n.d.c. [39]
Nucleosides CuSO4/Asc n.d. 8–12% n.d.c. [40]
4-(prop-2-ynyloxy)Benzaldehyde 35 min 90% [41]
Haloethylsulfoxides CuI/ascorbate/DIPEA n.d. 28.5 ± 2.5% [42]
50% n.d.c. Nitroaromatic substrates CuSO4/Asc 1 h [43]
71 ± 4% RGDfK 60 min 60 ± 2% [44]
55% Alkyne-func.
6-halopurines
One-pot BPDS-copper(I) (CuSO4/NaAsc.) 1 h 55–75% [45]
n.d. tert-butyl ester of N-Boc-(S)-propargyl glycine CuSO4, NaAsc 2.5 h 58 ± 4% [46]
Precursor: 2 steps
[18F]FEA: 15 min.
n.d. 3-Butynyl triphenyl phosphonium bromide 1 h n.d. [47]
1 step, 5–10 min 68–75% Alkynes of benzene rings 30 min 25–87% [48]
[18F] FEA from a polyflourinated sulfonate precursor n.d. n.d. FtRGD 70–75 min 10–30% n.d.c. [49]

18 F-Fluoro-PEG-Alkyne 1 step, 20 min 85–94% Various azides CuSO4/Asc 10–30 min 71–99% [50]
1 step, 15 min 65 ± 1.9% E(RGDyK)2 azide 110 min (estimated) 52 ± 8.3% [51]
57% Nanoparticle azide 1 h (estimated) 58% [52]
[18F]PEG3-azide 1 step, 40 min 62 ± 4% N-alkynylated peptide CuSO4/Asc/BPDS 2 h (estimated) 31 ± 6% [53]
n.d. ZnO nanoparticle alkynes n.d. >95% [54]
[18F]PEG-azide Precursor: 2 steps
labeling: 1 step
labeling: 58% γ-(11-azido-3,6,9-trioxaundecanyl)folic acid amide CuAcetate, NaAsc 2.5 h 8.5% [55]

4- [18F] fluoro-N-methyl-N-(prop-2-ynyl)- benzenesulfonamide (p [18F] F-SA) Precursor: 3 steps,  
labeling: 1 step, 80 min
32 ± 5% Azide-functionalized neurotensin Cu(I)-TBTA n.d. 66% [56]
Azide-functionalized human serum albumin (HSA) 100 min 55–60% [57]
n.d. Azide-functionalized phosphopeptide, protein (HAS), oligonucleotide (L-RNA) CuSO4/Asc 2 h 77%/55–60%/25% [58]

[18F] FPy5yne 1 step, 15 min 42% N3–(CH2)4–CO–YKRI–OH (BG142) Tetrakis(acetonitrilo) copper(I) hexa fluorophosphates/TBTA 160 min 18.7% [59]
Azide-functionalized DNA CuBr/TBTA and 2,6-lutidine 276 min 24.6 ± 0.5%
2-[18F]fluoro-3-pent-4-yn-1-yloxypyridine ([18F]FPyKYNE) 20–25 min 20–35% Azide-functionalized RGD peptide CuSO4/Asc 125 min 12–18% [60]
6-[18F]fluoro-2-etynylpyridine 1 step, 10 min 27.5 ± 6.6% D-amino acid analogue of WT-pHLIP azide Cu-Acetate/NaAsc 85 min 5–20% [61]

propargyl 4- [18F] fluorobenzoate ([18F] PFB) Precursor: 2 steps,
labeling: 1 steps, 15 min
58 ± 31% Benzyl azide, two lysine derivatives, transglutaminase-reactive peptide CuSO4/Asc 1 h (estimated) 88 ± 4%,
79 ± 33% and 75 ± 5%  
37 ± 31%
[62]
4-[18F]fluoro-3-nitro-N-2-propyn-1-yl-benzamide
([18F] FNPB)
1 step, 40 min 58% Azido-peptides cRGDfK and D4 peptide 1 h 87–93% [63]

1-(azidomethyl)-4- [18F] -fluorobenzene 4 steps, 75 min 34% 4-Ethynyl-L-phenylalanine-peptide CuI/NaAsc/DIEA 90 min 90% [64]
4 steps, 75 min 41% siRNA alkyne CuSO4/Asc/TBTA 120 min 15 ± 5% [65]
1 step, 45 min 84% siRNA-linker (two new alkyne-bearing linkers) CuSO4/Asc 120 min 12% [66]
1-Azido-4-(3-[18F] fluoropropoxy)benzene 4 steps, 75 min 35% 120 min 15 ± 5% [65]
[18F] (azidomethyl)fluorobenzene 1 step, 94–188 s around 40% siRNA alkyne n.d. n.d. [67]
4-[18F]Fluorophenylazide around 15%

3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-2- [18F] fluorogluco-pyranosyl azide 1 step, 30 min 71 ± 10% Fmoc-L-propargylglycine CuSO4/Asc 1.5 h (estimated) 60% [68]
2 step, 7.5 min n.d. Alkyne-functionalized peptides (RDG, neurotensin peptoid) 75 min 17–20% n.d.c. [69]
52% folate alkyne Cu-Acetate/NaAsc 3 h 5–25% [70]
1 step, 10 min 84% RGD-peptide alkyne CuSO4/Asc 70–75 min 16–24% [71]
1 step 1.3–4.7% Alkyne-bearing protein CuBr/TTMA 80–100 min 4.1% [72]
n.d. ETAR ligand alkyne CuSO4/Asc 70 min 20–25% n.d.c. [73]
cyanoquinoline (EGFR) alkyne 90 min 8.6 ± 2.3% n.d.c. [74]

[18F] A r B F 3 1 step, 20 min n.d. Alkyne-functionalized RGD CuI/Asc 1 h n.d. [75]
Alkyne-functionalized bombesin (BBN) 20 ± 10% n.d.c. [76]
2 steps, Alkyne-functionalized RGD-boronate 30 min 15–30% [77]

piperazine-based [18F] AFP
[18F] BFP
AFP: 4 steps, 54 h
BFP: 4 steps, 72 h
[18F]AFP: 1 step, 40 min
[18F]BFP: 1 step, 40 min
[18F]AFP: 29 ± 5% 
[18F]BFP: 31 ± 9%
N-Fmoc-e-azido-Lnorleucine (amino acid), SNEW peptide CuSO4, Asc 2 h Amino acid: 59–79%
SNEW peptide: 17–25%
[78]

[18F] serine 2 steps, 125 min 28 ± 5% cRDG-azide CuSO4, Asc 145 min 75% [6]

1Calculated as sum from all steps, for the 18F-prosthetic group, respectively, for the overall reaction yielding the click product, starting from fluorine-18.

2Radiochemical yields for the 18F-prosthetic group starting from fluorine-18 for the click reaction, respectively; decay corrected, as long as not noted elsewise.

CCA: click cycloaddition; (n.)d.c.: (not) decay corrected; Asc: ascorbate; DIPEA: diisopropylethylamin; TBTA: tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine; n.d.: no data.

Table 3.

New developments in 18F-click [3+2]cycloadditions, showing the 1,3-dipolar 18F-prosthetic groups, reaction type, and conditions.

18F-prosthetic group Steps/reaction time RCY Reacting agent Reaction type/
catalytic system
Overall reaction time1
(CCA)
RCY
CCA
Literature
C-(4-[18F]fluoro-phenyl)-N-phenyl-nitrone 2 steps/20 min, (labeling of [18F]FB-CHO: 1 step, 50 min) 22–37%1
([18F]FB-CHO: 30–50%)
(18F-nitrone: 74%)
Various maleimides 80 min
(10 min)
87–91% [19]
4-[18F]fluoro-benzonitrile oxide 3 steps/20 min (labeling of [18F]FB-CHO: 1 step, 50 min) 28–46%1
([18F]FB-CHO: 30–50%)
(18F-nitro oxide: 92%)
Various dipolarophiles 1,3-dipolar [3+2]cycloaddition, no catalyst 80 min
(10 min)
36–99% [20]
Cyclononyne-indomethacins
(COX-2 inhibitor)
81%
Maleimide-indomethacins
(COX-2 inhibitor)
55%
Propyne-indomethacins
(COX-2 inhibitor)
35%
N-hydroxy-4-[18F]fluorobenz-imidoyl chloride 4 steps/20 min (labeling of [18F]FB-CHO: 1 step, 50 min) 27–45%1
([18F]FB-CHO: 30–50%)
(18F-nitro oxide: 92%)
(18F-benzimidoyl Cl: 99%)
Cyclononyne-β-Ala-Phe-OMe
(dipeptide)
85 min
(10 min)
88%2
Norbornene-β-Ala-Phe-OMe
(dipeptide)
82%2

C-(4-[18F]fluoro-phenyl)-N-phenyl-nitrone 2 steps/20 min, (labeling of [18F]FB-CHO: 1 step, 50 min) 22–37%1
([18F]FB-CHO: 30–50%)
(18F-nitrone: 74%)
Terminal alkynes
methyl propiolate
radio-Kinugasa, CuSO4, AscONa
(L-histidine)
80 min
(10 min)
89%
(trans/cis = 2 : 3)
[21]
Terminal alkyne
propargyl alcohol
radio-Kinugasa, CuI (CuI-stabilizing ligands or pyridine) 100 min
(30 min)
82%
(trans/cis = 1 : 5)
60%
(trans/cis = 1 : 5)
Terminal alkyne
1-propargyl uracyl
(nucleobase chimera)
65%
(trans/cis = 4 : 1)
propiolyl-β-Ala-Phe-OMe
(dipeptide)
radio-Kinugasa, CuSO4, AscONa
(L-histidine)
80 min
(10 min)
85%
(trans/cis = 1 : 3)
propiolated protein
(BSA)
32%
o-/p-[18F]fluoro-phenyl acetylene n.d. n.d. 3,6-dihydro-2H-1,4-oxazine-4-oxide radio-Kinugasa, CuI (1,10-phenanthroline) (10 min) 52% (ortho)
41% (para)

1Calculated as sum from all steps.

2Best RCY, obtained only with high precursor amounts.

FB-CHO: 4-fluorobenzaldehyde; CCA: click cycloaddition; PHA: N-phenylhydroxylamine; AscONa: sodium ascorbate'; BSA: bovine serum albumin; n.d.: no data.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Lead structures of the most important 18F-prosthetic groups applied for copper-catalyzed click 18F-fluorination.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Lead structures of the most important 18F-prosthetic groups applied for copper-free click 18F-fluorination.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Lead structures of new 18F-prosthetic groups applied for click 18F-fluorination.

2. Copper-Catalyzed 18 F-Click Cycloadditions

In the last decade, the copper-catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), which has first been reported independently by Rostovtsev et al. [81] and Tornøe et al. [82] in 2002, has spread over almost all fields of chemistry [8387], biology [8890], and material science [91, 92]. The great advantage of this method is given by its outstanding efficiency, its regiospecificity, and fast formation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles at ambient temperatures, which is particularly suitable for 18F-labeling of sensitive biomolecules. In particular, the CuAAC enables incorporation of fluorine-18 via a prosthetic group under mild and bioorthogonal conditions [2225]. 1,2,3-triazoles were first introduced by Michael, who described the formation of a 1,2,3-triazole from a phenylazide in 1893 [93]. Following this pioneering work, Dimroth, Fester, and Huisgen described this type of reaction as a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition for the first time in 1963 [5].

In 2006, Marik and Sutcliffe published the application of the CuAAC as an 18F-labeling strategy for the first time [26]. They radiolabeled three different alkyne precursors in radiochemical yields (RCY) of 36–81%. Afterwards they were reacted them with azido-functionalized peptides in RCY of 54–99% and an overall reaction time of 30 min. Thus, they could show a new, very fast, efficient, and mild 18F-labeling strategy for complex compounds, especially appropriate for sensitive biomolecules. Only two years later, the suitability of this approach was demonstrated for the 18F-labeling of a folate derivative for in vivo tumor imaging with the same prosthetic group, 6-[18F]fluoro-1-hexyne [30]. The radiofolate was obtained in RCY of 25–35% and was applied to KB-tumor bearing mice. A specific tumor accumulation could be observed by using the folate receptor (FR) targeting concept. Furthermore, Kim et al. used 18F-labeled alkynes as prosthetic groups for the 18F-labeling of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl azide [27], which in turn was employed to label the α V β 6 specific peptide A20FMDV2 [28].

Considering all known clickable prosthetic groups for 18F-labeling, [18F]fluoroethyl azide ([18F]FEA) is certainly one of the most investigated clickable 18F-prosthetic groups. Until today, about twenty different manuscripts deal with [18F]FEA to radiolabel a broad variety of biomolecules and compounds. In 2007, Glaser and Årstad [31] mentioned for the first time the preparation of [18F]FEA with a RCY of 55% using 2-azidoethyl-4-toluenesulfonate as precursor. As a proof of concept, they reacted [18F]FEA with different terminal alkynes in very good to excellent RCY of 61–98%. With respect to the catalytic system copper sulfate in combination with ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate has mainly been used, whereas only in a few approaches copper(I) iodide was used [37, 42]. It has been shown that addition of bathophenanthroline disulfonate (CuI stabilizing agent) accelerates the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition [36, 38, 45]. The very good access to [18F]FEA led to the development of a variety of radiotracers labeled with this prosthetic group, like 18F-deoxyuridine [37], 18F-fluoro-oxothymidine (18F-FOT), or 18F-fluoro-thiothymidine (18F-FTT) [40] as well as apoptosis markers [36] and several peptide systems [34, 44, 49]. In 2012, Smith et al. [40] described the reduction of [18F]FEA using copper wire under acidic conditions, which is a possible explanation of the poor yields during some click reactions.

In 2007, Sirion et al. [50] reported for the first time [18F]fluoro-PEGx-derivatives (x = various polyethylene glycol (PEG) ratios) as new 18F-labeled prosthetic click groups. These compounds showed a reduced volatility and increased polarity compared with other 18F-labeled prosthetic groups like [18F]FEA or [18F]fluoroalkynes. These properties ease their handling as well as improving the in vivo behavior of the labeled compounds. The compounds showed a longer circulation time and a reduced renal clearance making them very suitable for in vivo application. Sirion et al. described the preparation of different aliphatic and aromatic 18F-PEG-azides and 18F-labeled alkynes in RCY of 85–94%. As a proof of concept, they carried out cycloadditions with the 18F-labeled prosthetic groups and the corresponding alkynes, respectively, azides in high RCY of 71–99%. Several other groups continued this work by using the 18F-labeled PEGylated prosthetic groups for labeling cRGD derivatives [51] and other peptides [53], nanoparticles [52, 54], or folates [55].

To increase the lipophilicity and metabolic stability of radiotracers, [18F]fluoro-aryl-based prosthetic groups have been developed and investigated. In 2007, Ramenda et al. [56] published for the first time a 4-[18F]fluoro-N-methyl-N-(prop-2-ynyl)-benzenesulfonamide (p-[18F]F-SA), which was obtained in RCY of 32 ± 5%. Subsequently, this prosthetic group was used for radiolabeling an azido-functionalized neurotensin giving a RCY of 66%. Furthermore, the same group used the 18F-aryl prosthetic group for the labeling of human serum albumin (HSA) [57] and other proteins, phosphopeptides, and L-RNA [58] in good RCY. A pyridine-based 18F-prosthetic group was first introduced by Inkster et al. [59] in 2008 by reacting [18F]FPy5yne with a model peptide in RCY of 18.7% and an overall reaction time of 160 min. They started from either 2-nitro- or 2-trimethylammonium pyridine to synthesize [18F]FPy5yne with a RCY of 42%. Furthermore, [18F]pyridine derivatives have been used to radiolabel cRGDs [60] and the D-amino acid analog of WT-pHLIP [61].

In 2009, Vaidyanathan et al. [62] presented a prosthetic group based on a 4-[18F]fluorobenzoate. Propargyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]PFB), which could be obtained in RCY of 58 ± 31% within 15 min. To investigate the labeling properties of this new prosthetic group, numerous compounds have been 18F-labeled using [18F]PFB with RCY from 37% to 88% and overall reaction times of about 1 h. Another approach was published by Li et al. in 2012 [63], who synthesized 4-[18F]fluoro-3-nitro-N-2-propyn-1-yl-benzamide ([18F]FNPB) for 18F-labeling of cRGDfK and a D4 peptide, which was identified as an EGFR targeting ligand. This approach was followed by the synthesis of 1-(azidomethyl)-4-[18F]fluorobenzene by Thonon et al. [64]. They did a multistep radiosynthesis (4 steps), where the fluorine-18 was introduced in the first step. The desired radiolabeled product could be obtained in a RCY of 34% within 75 min and was used itself to label a 4-ethynyl-L-phenylalanine-containing peptide. The same prosthetic group was also employed by Mercier et al. [65] and Flagothier et al. [66] for 18F-labeling of siRNA. Other structural analog prosthetic groups have also been developed by Mercier et al. [65] and Chun and Pike [67].

To improve the in vivo behavior of peptides with respect to blood clearance and stability, Maschauer and Prante developed 18F-gluco-derivatives for CuAAC-radiolabeling of Fmoc-L-propargylglycine with a RCY of 60% [68]. They showed that the 18F-click labeling reaction was more convenient by using the β-anomeric derivative of the azides, respectively, alkynes, giving very high RCY of 71 ± 10%. One year later, they published the first in vivo evaluation of an 18F-labeled RGD peptide labeled with [18F]FDG-β-Az in U87MG-tumor bearing mice showing an improved blood clearance and stability [65, 66]. Likewise, Fischer et al. demonstrated in 2012 that a [18F]fluorodeoxyglycosyl folate could be obtained in RCY of 5–25% and subsequent biodistribution and PET-imaging studies showed a high and specific uptake of the radiotracer in FR-positive tumors [70]. The variety of new 18F-labeling strategies using 18F-Fluoroglycosylation is the focus of a review article as a part of this special issue provided by Maschauer and Prante [94].

As another promising approach, Li et al. presented in 2013 an alkyne-functionalized aryltri-[18F]fluoroborate for radiolabeling azido-bombesin and azido-RGD. The major advantage of this method is the two-step, one-pot procedure providing a water-soluble and noncoordinating aryltri-[18F]fluoroborate anion, which provided specific activities up to 555 GBq/μmol [75, 76, 95].

Two new piperazine-based prosthetic groups, 1-(but-3-ynyl)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)piperazine ([18F]BFP) and 1-(3-azidopropyl)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)piperazine ([18F]AFP), have recently been developed by Pretze and Mamat [78]. Spiro salts were used as precursors, facilitating purification by using solid phase extractions (RP-18 or SiO2-cartridges). Both prosthetic groups could be obtained in RCY of about 30% using an automated synthesis module. To avoid Glaser coupling, which has been observed by using [18F]BFP for radiolabeling of peptides, [18F]AFP was used instead. An important observation was the fact that the applied peptide formed very strong complexes with the copper catalyst, which required the use of bispidine as a strong chelating agent to remove cytotoxic copper species.

One of the latest developments describes the synthesis of an 18F-labeled alanine derivative as a new prosthetic click group, reported by Schieferstein and Ross [6]. In this case, an amino acid-based prosthetic group has been developed to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of 18F-click-labeled biomolecules. The prosthetic group was obtained in good RCY of 28 ± 5% from a two-step reaction as described in Figure 2. The final 18F-labeled prosthetic group was subsequently reacted with an azido-RGD as model system in RCY of 75% within 20 min.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Radiosynthesis of a new amino-acid based 18F-prosthetic group (N-propargyl-2-amino-3-[18F]fluoro-propionic acid, “[18F]serine”) for 18F-CuAAC-labeling of complex biomolecules. (i) [K ⊂ 2.2.2]+/18F, DMSO, 140°C, 10 min; (ii) hydrochloric acid (3.3 M), 100°C, 15 min; for analytical purposes (sequential deprotection): (iii) sodium hydroxide (3.3 M), 60°C, 5 min; (iv) hydrochloric acid (3.3 M), 100°C, 15 min.

Considering the above-mentioned prosthetic groups for radiolabeling with fluorine-18, Table 1 summarizes important properties of those components. It has been shown that the integration of an 18F-propyl, 18F-ethyl, or 18F-aryl moiety can provide an improved metabolic profile and that the glycosylation or PEGylation can further improve the in vivo behavior. Furthermore, for in vivo application a total removal of the copper catalyst is essential. This could be very challenging in the case where peptides or proteins are able to complex copper species from the catalytic system.

3. Copper-Free 18F-Click Cycloadditions

Even though a large number of novel radiotracers using click chemistry have been developed, none of them has entered clinical routine to date, apart from 18F-RGD-K5, which is already used in clinical trials in US. This can be explained by the need of cytotoxic copper during radiotracer syntheses by using copper-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar Huisgen cycloadditions [96]. Thus, there is still a demand for facile (metal-free) and robust 18F-labeling reactions for the syntheses of radiotracers for imaging of malignancies in vivo. This leads to the development of catalyst-free click-labeling approaches, which spare copper species during labeling steps and even enable in vivo pretargeting concept. Recent developments deal with biocompatible strain-promoted copper-free versions of the alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC), where the focus has been set on derivatives of cyclooctynes and dibenzocyclooctynes. First approaches focus on the reaction of 18F-labeled cyclooctynes with azide-bearing biomolecules. On the other hand, in further approaches cyclooctyne-carrying bioactive compounds are used, which can be labeled with different 18F-labeled azides. In the beginning, only a few studies have been reported due to the complex and low yielding syntheses of strained cyclooctynes [10, 12, 14]. However, nowadays lots of cyclooctyne derivatives are commercially available, which facilitates the precursor syntheses and opens a wide range of applications.

In 2011 Bouvet et al. [7] published the first example of a SPAAC with 18F-labeled aza-dibenzocyclooctyne, [18F]FB-DBCO, and a plethora of azides. The 18F-labeled building block was synthesized via acylation of commercially available N-(3-aminopropionyl)-5,6-dihydro-11,12-didehydrodibenzo[b,f]azocine with N-succinimidyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]SFB), which can be easily prepared in an automated synthesis module [97]. The 18F-labeled cyclooctyne could be obtained in a RCY of 85% and a purity >95% within 60 min. The evaluation of this building block in healthy Balb/C mice showed 60% of intact compound at 60 min p.i. and had a blood clearance half-life of 53 s. Besides, the compound was stable in methanol and phosphate buffer over 60 min. Subsequently, [18F]FB-DBCO was reacted with various azides as proof of principle showing different structural complexities. In all reactions, the formation of two regioisomers (1,4- and 1,5-triazole) has been observed and in some cases a separation of the regioisomers by HPLC was impossible. All 18F-labeled radiotracers were obtained in good to excellent RCY of 69–98% within an overall reaction time of about 2 h. However, the reaction rates in these cases were much slower compared to other examples of bioorthogonal reactions, limiting this new approach for in vivo pretargeting applications.

A cyclooctyne derivative has been conjugated to bombesin (aza-DBCO-BN, 9 steps) with an overall yield of 17% by Campbell-Verduyn et al.   [8]. The aza-DBCO-BN was reacted with various 18F-azides giving RCY of 19–37% within 30 min. In 2011, Arumugam et al. [9] investigated the direct 18F-labeling of azadibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO) yielding the 18F-labeled prosthetic group (RCY = 36%). The radiolabeling was followed by a click reaction with an azido-octreotide leading to the 18F-labeled octreotide in a RCY of 95% within a total reaction time of 1.5 h. In contrast, other working groups used 18F-cyclooctynes for labeling RDG-derivatives [11] as well as further integrin-specific peptides [10, 13].

Another possibility to perform copper-free click reactions is given by the inverse electron demand of the Diels Alder cycloaddition between a cyclooctene and a tetrazine under the release of nitrogen. The so-called tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation (TTCO ligation) was first published by Li et al. in 2010 [14]. Concerning the instability of the tetrazines, it is more practical to functionalize the biomolecule with a tetrazine followed by the reaction with an 18F-labeled cyclooctene. The latter are much more suitable for direct 18F-labeling than tetrazines. For this purpose a nosylate precursor was used for 18F-labeling of the cyclooctene providing RCY of 71% within 15 min. To investigate the suitability of the 18F-prosthetic group in click reactions, the 18F-cyclooctene was reacted with a 3,6-di(2-pyridyl)-S-tetrazine in an excellent RCY of 98% within 10 s, showing its outstanding feasibility for in vivo pretargeting approaches. These fast reaction rates made this approach very attractive that even 11C-labeling reaction was explored using the inverse electron demand Diels Alder cycloaddition between a cyclooctene and a tetrazine [98]. In 2011, 18F-labeled cyclooctene was linked to a tetrazine-RGD derivative by Selvaraj et al. [15] with a RCY of 90% within 5 min at room temperature. The resulting 18F-labeled tracer was tested in in vivo experiments showing a high tumor accumulation, which could selectively be blocked. In 2012, the group of Devaraj et al. [80] published for the first time the in vivo click reaction of [18F]trans-cyclooctene and a polymer-modified tetrazine (PMT). The radiolabeled peptide 18F-PMT10 could be obtained in a RCY of 89.2%. Whole body animal PET scans were carried out 3 h p.i., showing renal clearance and a widespread tissue distribution as can be seen in Figure 4. Previously, the same group described the synthesis of an 18F-labeled cyclooctene with a RCY of 46.1 ± 12.2%. Subsequently, this prosthetic group was clicked with a tetrazine-modified exendin-4 in RCY of 46.7 ± 17.3% [16].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

PET and autoradiography using 18F-tetrazine agents. (a) PET/CT fusion of LS174T tumor xenograft labeled using either trans-cyclooctene (TCO) monoclonal antibodies (mAb TCO) or control unlabeled antibodies (mAb) followed by 18F-PMT10 (polymer-modified tetrazine). Arrows indicate location of the tumor xenograft. The bladder was omitted for clarity. (b) Imaging using autoradiography (left side) and fluorescence slices after targeting with fluorescence TCO monoclonal antibody and 18F-PMT10. (c) PET/CT fusion of mouse bearing A431 and LS174T tumors after targeting with anti-A33 TCO monoclonal antibodies followed by 18F-PMT10. Arrows indicate location of tumors and the liver was omitted for clarity. (d) Autoradiography of representative 1 mm LS174T and A431 tumor slices after multistep targeting (reprinted with permission from [80]; Copyright 2012 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America).

A similar strategy was published by Knight et al. in 2013, where an 18F-labeled amino-functionalized norbornene was reacted with a tetrazine-modified peptide [18]. The 18F-labeled norbornene was obtained using N-succinimicyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]SFB) in RCY of 60 ± 17% within 52 min. As a proof of concept, two different tetrazines, an asymmetric dipyridyl tetrazine, and a tetrazine-modified bombesin peptide were labeled with 18F-labeled norbornene derivative ([18F]NFB) in 46–97% RCY within 82 min.

Considering the copper-free click labeling of bioactive compounds with fluorine-18, both the strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) and the tetrazine-trans-cyclooctyne ligation (TTCO ligation) show promising results. Regarding in vivo pretargeting approaches, only the TTCO ligation showed favorable results and reaction rates, which are suitable for this application [80]. Table 2 summarizes reaction conditions, radiochemical yields, and reaction partners of those components.

Table 2.

Summary of the prosthetic groups, reaction conditions, and reaction partners applied for copper-free click fluorination.

18F-prosthetic group Steps/reaction time1 RCY2 Reacting agent Reaction type/catalytic system Overall reaction time1
(CCA)
RCY2
CCA
Literature
[18F]COT 1 step, 15 min 71% 3,6-diaryl-s-tetrazine inverse electron-demand DA cyclo-addition 30 min (without HPLC) >98% [14]

[18F]FB-DBCO 1 step, 60 min 85% Various azides Strain-promoted click 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition 2 h 69–98% [7]
TCO-derivative:
Aza-DBCO-BN
(bombesin)
9 steps, — 17% Three different [18F]azides 30 min (without HPLC) 19–37%
(depending on azide)
[8]
[18F]DBCO 1 step, 1 h 21% Tyr3-octreotide-N3(TATE) 1.5 h 95% [9]

[18F]TCO [14] [14] Tetrazine-RGD Inverse electron-demand DA cyclo-addition 30 min 90% [15]

[18F]bifunctional azadibenzocyclo-octyne 1 step, 30 min 24.5% Alkyl azide Strain-promoted click 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition 202 ± 34 min 74 ± 4.8% [10]
[18F]PEG4 azide 1 step, 45 min 63% cRGD-DBCO 80 min 92% [11]
[18F]cyclooctyne 6–11 steps,
30–80 h (depending on the derivative)
20–57% (depending on the derivative) [18F]2-fluoro-
ethylazide
30 min. 9.6–97% (depending on COT and solvent) [12]
[79]

[18F]trans-cyclooctene ([18F]TCO) 1 step, 102 min 46.1 ± 12.2% Tetrazine modified exendin-4 Inverse electron-demand DA cycloaddition 3 h 46.7 ± 17.3% [16]
Polymer modified tetrazine 89.2% in vivo [80]
[18F]amine-functionalised norbornene 1 step, 52 min 60 ± 17% Tetrazine
(peptide-/bombesin-derivatives)
82 min (without preparation of [18F]SFB) 46–97% (depending on the tetrazine) [18]

[18F]FBA-C6-DBCO [10] [10] α V β 6-specific peptide Strain-promoted click 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition click: 40 ± 4 min 11.9 ± 3.2% [13]

1Calculated as sum from all steps, for the 18F-prosthetic group, respectively, for the overall reaction leading to the click product, starting from fluorine-18.

2Radiochemical yields for the 18F-prosthetic group starting from fluorine-18 for the click reaction, respectively; decay corrected, as long as not noted elsewise.

CCA: click cycloaddition; DA: Diels Alder; DBCO: aza-dibenzocyclooctyne; TCO: trans-cyclooctyne.

4. New Developments in 18F-Click Cycloadditions

The latest developments in metal-free 18F-click cycloadditions have been reported by Zlatopolskiy et al. [1921] (Table 3). In a first approach, the 18F-labeled building block C-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone was developed to form 18F-isoxazolidines via high-yielding [3+2]cycloadditions with various maleimides [19]. C-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone was obtained from the reaction of 4-[18F]fluorobenzaldehyde and N-phenylhydroxylamine in high RCY of 74% with 10 min. In the subsequent click cycloaddition step, differently substituted maleimides as model dipolarophiles were used to form the corresponding isoxazolidines as endo-/exoisomers in high yields of up to >90% within 10 min. A one-pot strategy with in situ generation of C-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone provided the desired 18F-isoxazolidines only in moderate yields of 25% and only after heating to 110°C. Under optimized conditions, 18F-isoxazolidines were obtained from fast 18F-click [3+2]cycloadditions.

In further studies, the same group used 4-[18F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide instead of C-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone as 1,3-dipol for milder reaction conditions [20] (Table 3). 4-[18F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide was obtained in 92% RCY within 10 min from the reaction of 4-[18F]fluorobenzaldehyde (RCY: 30–50%, 50 min [99]) with hydroxylamine and subsequent treatment with phenyl iodine bis(trifluoroacetate).

After the click [3+2]cycloaddition to various 18F-labeled model 2-isoxazolines and isoxazoles was successfully tested, the novel method was applied to three different COX-2 inhibitors (indomethacin conjugates) carrying dipolarophilic moieties of cyclononyne, maleimide, and propyne. The resulting products were obtained in moderate to excellent RCY of 81%, 55%, and 35%, respectively. It is noteworthy that, for the propyne derivative, the milder oxidant [bis(acetoxy)iodo]benzene was used to avoid decomposition. Finally, the method was successfully adapted for 18F-labeling of two model dipeptide conjugates, cyclononyne- and norbornene-β-Ala-Phe-OMe. However, the original cycloaddition using 4-[18F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide did only provide traces of the desired products. Consequently, 4-[18F]fluorobenzonitrile oxide was further treated with chloramine T (CAT) in situ forming the more stable building block N-hydroxy-4-[18F]fluorobenzimidoyl chloride. With the use of high precursor (peptides) amounts, the latter enabled excellent RCY of the 18F-labeled dipeptides of up to 88% within 10 min at room temperature [20]. Under optimized conditions low precursor amounts of 5 nmol (cyclononyne) and 50 nmol (norbornene-β-Ala-Phe-OMe) still allowed RCY of 56% and 47%, respectively.

In a very recent report, Zlatopolskiy and coworkers applied their 18F-labeled nitrone, C-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone, for the first formation of 18F-labeled β-lactames via the CuI-catalyzed Kinugasa reaction [21] (Table 3). The optimized reactions went smooth under very mild conditions to give the 18F-labeled model β-lactames in high RCY and various isomeric mixtures of the trans- and cis-product. In dependency on the reactivity of the terminal alkynes, the reaction parameters needed (individual) optimization regarding catalyst system, solvent, temperature, and CuI-stabilizing ligands. As a biologically relevant molecule the 18Flabeled nucleobase chimera was synthesized as potential PET-imaging agent for bacterial infections.

Moreover, the dipeptide β-Ala-Phe-OMe was propiolated and used in this radio-Kinugasa reaction to give excellent RCY of 85% of the 18F-labeled dipeptide under very mild conditions (aqueous solution, room temperature) [21]. Similarly, this new method was successfully transferred to the 18F-labeling of proteins. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was conjugated with 3-propiolamidopropyl chloroformate. This propiolated BSA was successfully radiolabeled with fluorine-18 in the radio-Kinugasa reaction.

5. Conclusions

The field of click cycloadditions had and still has a major impact in 18F-labeling chemistry. The very mild reaction conditions mostly applicable and the excellent efficiency of all types of these reactions are particularly suitable for 18F-labeling. Especially, complex and sensitive biomolecules benefit from this methodology. No protection group chemistry is needed and the 18F-click cycloaddition step provides the final radiotracer.

Besides several new 18F-labeled radiotracers are available via click cycloadditions, and the metal-free versions even enabled pretargeting concepts by in vivo click. The latest development of a radio-Kinugasa reaction towards the first 18F-β-lactames demonstrates the highly active field and the broad applicability of 18F-click cycloadditions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Phelps ME. Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(16):9226–9233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fowler JS, Wolf AP. The synthesis of carbon-11, fluorine-18 and nitrogen-13 labeled radiotracers for biomedical applications. Bnl-31222 de82 013799. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coenen HH, Franken K, Kling P, Stocklin G. Direct electrophilic radiofluorination of phenylalanine, tyrosine and dopa. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1988;39(12):1243–1250. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lang L, Eckelman WC. One-step synthesis of 18F labeled [18F]-N-succinimidyl 4-(fluoromethyl)benzoate for protein labeling. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1994;45(12):1155–1163. doi: 10.1016/0969-8043(94)90031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huisgen R. 1.3-dipolare cycloadditionen. Angewandte Chemie. 1963;(13):604–637. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schieferstein H, Ross TL. A Polar 18F-labeled amino acid derivative for click-labeling of biomolecules. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bouvet V, Wuest M, Wuest F. Copper-free click chemistry with the short-lived positron emitter fluorine-18. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2011;9(21):7393–7399. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06034a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campbell-Verduyn LS, Mirfeizi L, Schoonen AK, Dierckx RA, Elsinga PH, Feringa BL. Strain-promoted copper-free “click” chemistry for 18F radiolabeling of bombesin. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2011;50(47):11117–11120. doi: 10.1002/anie.201105547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arumugam S, Chin J, Schirrmacher R, Popik VV, Kostikov AP. [18F]azadibenzocyclooctyne ([18F]ADIBO): a biocompatible radioactive labeling synthon for peptides using catalyst free [3+2] cycloaddition. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011;21(23):6987–6991. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.09.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carpenter RD, Hausner SH, Sutcliffe JL. Copper-free click for PET: rapid 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with a fluorine-18 cyclooctyne. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011;2(12):885–889. doi: 10.1021/ml200187j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sachin K, Jadhav VH, Kim E-M, et al. F-18-labeling protocol of peptides based on chemically orthogonal strain-promoted cycloaddition under physiologically friendly reaction conditions. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2012;23(8):1680–1686. doi: 10.1021/bc3002425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evans HL, Slade RL, Carroll L, et al. Copper-free click—a promising tool for pre-targeted PET imaging. Chemical Communications. 2012;48(7):991–993. doi: 10.1039/c1cc16220a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hausner SH, Carpenter RD, Bauer N, Sutcliffe JL. Evaluation of an integrin α v β 6-specific peptide labeled with [18F]fluorine by copper-free, strain-promoted click chemistry. Nuclear Medicine and Biolology. 2013;40(2):233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li Z, Cai H, Hassink M, et al. Tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation for the rapid construction of 18F labeled probes. Chemical Communications. 2010;46(42):8043–8045. doi: 10.1039/c0cc03078c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Selvaraj R, Liu S, Hassink M, et al. Tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation for the rapid construction of integrin α v β 3 targeted PET tracer based on a cyclic RGD peptide. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011;21(17):5011–5014. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keliher EJ, Reiner T, Thurber GM, Upadhyay R, Weissleder R. Efficient 18F-labeling of synthetic exendin-4 analogues for imaging beta cells. ChemistryOpen. 2012;1(4):177–183. doi: 10.1002/open.201200014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Devaraj N. Advancing tetrazine bioorthogonal reactions through the development of new synthetic tools. Synlett. 2012;23(15):2147–2152. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knight JC, Richter S, Wuest M, Way JD, Wuest F, “Synthesis a nd evaluation of an 18F-labelled norbornene derivative for copper-free click chemistry reactions. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2013;11(23):3817–3825. doi: 10.1039/c3ob40548f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zlatopolskiy BD, Kandler R, Mottaghy FM, Neumaier B. C-(4-[18F]fluorophenyl)-N-phenyl nitrone: a novel 18F-labeled building block for metal free [3+2]cycloaddition. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2012;70(1):184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zlatopolskiy BD, Kandler R, Kobus D, Mottaghy FM, Neumaier B. Beyond azide-alkyne click reaction: easy access to 18F-labelled compounds via nitrile oxide cycloadditions. Chemical Communications. 2012;48(57):7134–7136. doi: 10.1039/c2cc31335a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zlatopolskiy BD, Krapf P, Richarz R, Frauendorf H, Mottaghy FM, Neumaier B. Synthesis of 18F-labelled β-lactams by using the kinugasa reaction. Chemistry: A European Journal. 2014;20:4697–4703. doi: 10.1002/chem.201304056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schirrmacher R, Wängler C, Schirrmacher E. Recent developments and trends in 18F-radiochemistry: syntheses and applications. Mini-Reviews in Organic Chemistry. 2007;4(4):317–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Glaser M, Robins EG. “Click labelling” in PET radiochemistry. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2009;52(10):407–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ross TL. The click chemistry approach applied to fluorine-18. Current Radiopharmaceuticals. 2010;3(3):202–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pretze M, Pietzsch D, Mamat C. Recent trends in bioorthogonal click-radiolabeling reactions using fluorine-18. Molecules. 2013;18(7):8618–8665. doi: 10.3390/molecules18078618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marik J, Sutcliffe JL. Click for PET: rapid preparation of [18F]fluoropeptides using CuI catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. Tetrahedron Letters. 2006;47(37):6681–6684. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim DH, Choe YS, Jung K-H, et al. A 18F-labeled glucose analog: synthesis using a click labeling method and in vitro evaluation. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2008;31(5):587–593. doi: 10.1007/s12272-001-1197-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim DH, Choe YS, Kim B-T. Evaluation of 4-[18F]fluoro-1-butyne as a radiolabeled synthon for click chemistry with azido compounds. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2010;68(2):329–333. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hausner SH, Marik J, Gagnon MKJ, Sutcliffe JL. In vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with an α v β 6 specific peptide radiolabeled using 18F-“click” chemistry: evaluation and comparison with the corresponding 4-[18F]fluorobenzoyl- and 2-[18F] fluoropropionyl-peptides. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;51(19):5901–5904. doi: 10.1021/jm800608s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ross TL, Honer M, Lam PYH, et al. Fluorine-18 click radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation of a new 18F-labeled folic acid derivative. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2008;19(12):2462–2470. doi: 10.1021/bc800356r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Glaser M, Årstad E. “Click labeling” with 2-[18F]fluoroethylazide for positron emission tomography. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2007;18(3):989–993. doi: 10.1021/bc060301j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kobus D, Giesen Y, Ullrich R, Backes H, Neumaier B. A fully automated two-step synthesis of an 18F-labelled tyrosine kinase inhibitor for EGFR kinase activity imaging in tumors. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2009;67(11):1977–1984. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smith G, Glaser M, Perumal M, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological characterization of a caspase 3/7 selective isatin labeled with 2-[18F]fluoroethylazide. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;51(24):8057–8067. doi: 10.1021/jm801107u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Glaser M, Solbakken M, Turton DR, et al. Methods for 18F-labeling of RGD peptides: comparison of aminooxy [18F] fluorobenzaldehyde condensation with “click labeling” using 2-[18F]fluoroethylazide, and S-alkylation with [18F] fluoropropanethiol. Amino Acids. 2009;37(4):717–724. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0200-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pisaneschi F, Nguyen Q-D, Shamsaei E, et al. Development of a new epidermal growth factor receptor positron emission tomography imaging agent based on the 3-cyanoquinoline core: synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;18(18):6634–6645. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Glaser M, Goggi J, Smith G, et al. Improved radiosynthesis of the apoptosis marker 18F-ICMT11 including biological evaluation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011;21(23):6945–6949. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ackermann U, O’Keefe G, Lee S-T, et al. Synthesis of a [18F]fluoroethyltriazolylthymidine radiotracer from [18F]2-fluoroethyl azide and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2011;54(5):260–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Iddon L, Leyton J, Indrevoll B, et al. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of [18F]fluoroethyl triazole labelled [Tyr3]octreotate analogues using click chemistry. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011;21(10):3122–3127. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fortt R, Smith G, Awais RO, Luthra SK, Aboagye EO. Automated GMP synthesis of [18F]ICMT-11 for in vivo imaging of caspase-3 activity. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2012;39(7):1000–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith G, Sala R, Carroll L, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of nucleoside radiotracers for imaging proliferation. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2012;39(5):652–665. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhou D, Chu W, Dence CS, Mach RH, Welch MJ. Highly efficient click labeling using 2-[18F]fluoroethyl azide and synthesis of an 18F-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester as conjugation agent. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2012;39(8):1175–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Laurens E, Yeoh SD, Rigopoulos A, et al. Radiolabelling and evaluation of novel haloethylsulfoxides as PET imaging agents for tumor hypoxia. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2012;39(6):871–882. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bejot R, Carroll L, Bhakoo K, Declerck J, Gouverneur V. A fluorous and click approach for screening potential PET probes: evaluation of potential hypoxia biomarkers. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;20(1):324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li J, Shi L, Jia L, et al. Radiolabeling of RGD peptide and preliminary biological evaluation in mice bearing U87MG tumors. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;20(12):3850–3855. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Galante E, Schoultz BW, Koepp M, Arstad E. Chelator-accelerated one-pot “click” labeling of small molecule tracers with 2-[18F]fluoroethyl azide. Molecules. 2013;18(5):5335–5347. doi: 10.3390/molecules18055335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sai KKS, Huang C, Yuan L, et al. 18F-AFETP,18F-FET, and 18F-FDG imaging of mouse DBT gliomas. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2013;54(7):1120–1126. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.113217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Haslop A, Gee A, Plisson C, Long N. Fully automated radiosynthesis of [1-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl),1H[1,2,3]triazole 4-ethylene] triphenylphosphonium bromide as a potential positron emission tomography tracer for imaging apoptosis. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2013;56(6):313–316. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jia L, Cheng Z, Shi L, et al. Fluorine-18 labeling by click chemistry: multiple probes in one pot. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2013;75:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bejot R, Goggi J, Moonshi SS, Robins EG. A practical synthesis of [18F]FtRGD: an angiogenesis biomarker for PET. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2013;56(2):42–49. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sirion U, Kim HJ, Lee JH, et al. An efficient F-18 labeling method for PET study: huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of bioactive substances and F-18-labeled compounds. Tetrahedron Letters. 2007;48(23):3953–3957. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li Z-B, Wu Z, Chen K, Chin FT, Chen X. Click chemistry for 18F-labeling of RGD peptides and microPET imaging of tumor integrin α v β 3 expression. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2007;18(6):1987–1994. doi: 10.1021/bc700226v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Devaraj NK, Keliher EJ, Thurber GM, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R. 18F labeled nanoparticles for in Vivo PET-CT imaging. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2009;20(2):397–401. doi: 10.1021/bc8004649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gill HS, Marik J. Preparation of 18F-labeled peptides using the copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. Nature Protocols. 2011;6(11):1718–1725. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lee C-M, Jeong H-J, Kim DW, Sohn M-H, Lim ST. The effect of fluorination of zinc oxide nanoparticles on evaluation of their biodistribution after oral administration. Nanotechnology. 2012;23(20) doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/20/205102.205102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schieferstein H, Betzel T, Fischer CR, Ross TL. 18F-click labeling and preclinical evaluation of a new 18F-folate for PET imaging. EJNMMI Research. 2013;3, article 68:1–10. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ramenda T, Bergmann R, Wuest F. Synthesis of 18F-labeled neurotensin(8-13) via copper-mediated 1,3-dipolar [3+2]cycloaddition reaction. Letters in Drug Design and Discovery. 2007;4(4):279–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ramenda T, Kniess T, Bergmann R, Steinbach J, Wuest F. Radiolabelling of proteins with fluorine-18 via click chemistry. Chemical Communications. 2009;(48):7521–7523. doi: 10.1039/b916075b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ramenda T, Steinbach J, Wuest F. 4-[18F]Fluoro-N-methyl-N-(propyl-2-yn-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide ([18F]F-SA): a versatile building block for labeling of peptides, proteins and oligonucleotides with fluorine-18 via Cu(I)-mediated click chemistry. Amino Acids. 2013;44(4):1167–1180. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1450-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Inkster JAH, Guérin B, Ruth TJ, Adam MJ. Radiosynthesis and bioconjugation of [18F]FPy5yne, a prosthetic group for the 18F labeling of bioactive peptides. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2008;51(14):444–452. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Valdivia AC, Estrada M, Hadizad T, Stewart DJ, Beanlands RS, Dasilva JN. A fast, simple, and reproducible automated synthesis of [18F]FPyKYNE-c(RGDyK) for α v β 3 receptor positron emission tomography imaging. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2012;55(2):57–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Daumar P, Wanger-Baumann CA, Pillarsetty N, et al. Efficient 18F-labeling of large 37-amino-acid pHLIP peptide analogues and their biological evaluation. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2012;23(8):1557–1566. doi: 10.1021/bc3000222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vaidyanathan G, White BJ, Zalutsky MR. Propargyl 4-[18F]fluorobenzoate: a putatively more stable prosthetic group for the fluorine-18 labeling of biomolecules via click chemistry. Current Radiopharmaceuticals. 2009;2(1):63–74. doi: 10.2174/1874471010902010063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li Y, Liu Y, Zhang L, Xu Y. One-step radiosynthesis of 4-[18F]flouro-3-nitro-N-2-propyn-1-yl-benzamide ([18F]FNPB): a new stable aromatic porosthetic group for efficient labeling of peptides with fluorine-18. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2012;55(6):229–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Thonon D, Kech C, Paris J, Lemaire C, Luxen A. New strategy for the preparation of clickable peptides and labeling with 1-(azidomethyl)-4-[18F]-fluorobenzene for PET. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2009;20(4):817–823. doi: 10.1021/bc800544p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mercier F, Paris J, Kaisin G, et al. General method for labeling siRNA by click chemistry with fluorine-18 for the purpose of PET maging. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2011;22(1):108–114. doi: 10.1021/bc100263y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Flagothier J, Kaisin G, Mercier F, et al. Synthesis of two new alkyne-bearing linkers used for the preparation of siRNA for labeling by click chemistry with fluorine-18. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2012;70(8):1549–1557. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chun J-H, Pike VW. Single-step radiosynthesis of “18F-labeled click synthons” from azide-functionalized diaryliodonium salts. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2012;2012(24):4541–4547. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201200695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Maschauer S, Prante O. A series of 2-O-trifluoromethylsulfonyl-d-mannopyranosides as precursors for concomitant 18F-labeling and glycosylation by click chemistry. Carbohydrate Research. 2009;344(6):753–761. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Maschauer S, Einsiedel J, Haubner R, et al. Labeling and glycosylate of peptides using click chemistry: a general approach to 18F-glycopeptides as effective imaging probes for positron emission tomography. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010;49(5):976–979. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fischer CR, Müller C, Reber J, et al. [18F]fluoro-deoxy-glucose folate: a novel PET radiotracer with improved in vivo properties for folate receptor targeting. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2012;23(4):805–813. doi: 10.1021/bc200660z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Maschauer S, Haubner R, Kuwert T, Prante O. 18F-Glyco-RGD peptides for PET imaging of integrin expression: efficient radiosynthesis by click chemistry and modulation of biodistribution by glycosylation. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2014;11(2):505–515. doi: 10.1021/mp4004817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Boutureira O, D’Hooge F, Fernández-González M, et al. Fluoroglycoproteins: ready chemical site-selective incorporation of fluorosugars into proteins. Chemical Communications. 2010;46(43):8142–8144. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01576h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Maschauer S, Michel K, Tripal P, et al. Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of an 18F-labeled glycoconjugate of PD156707 for imaging ETA receptor expression in thyroid carcinoma by positron emission tomography. Americam Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2013;3(5):425–436. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pisaneschi F, Slade RL, Iddon L, et al. Synthesis of a new fluorine-18 glycosylated “click” cyanoquinoline for the imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2014;57(2):92–96. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li Y, Guo J, Tang S, Lang L, Chen X, Perrin DM. One-step and one-pot-two-step radiosynthesis of functional imaging. American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2013;3(1):44–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li Y, Liu Z, Harwig CW, et al. 18F-click labeling of a bombesin antagonist with an alkyne-18F-ArBF3-: in vivo PET imaging of tumors expressing the GRP-receptor. American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2013;3(1):57–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liu Z, Li Y, Lozada J, et al. Stoichiometric Leverage: rapid 18F-aryltrifluoroborate radiosynthesis at high specific activity for click conjugation. Angewandte Chemie. 2013;125(8):2359–2363. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pretze M, Mamat C. Automated preparation of [18F]AFP and [18F]BFP: two novel bifunctional 18F-labeling building blocks for Huisgen-click. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry. 2013;150:25–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fani M, Wang X, Nicolas G, et al. Development of new folate-based PET radiotracers: preclinical evaluation of 68Ga-DOTA-folate conjugates. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2011;38(1):108–119. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1597-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Devaraj NK, Thurber GM, Keliher EJ, Marinelli B, Weissleder R. Reactive polymer enables efficient in vivo bioorthogonal chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(13):4762–4767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113466109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “Ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angewandte Chemie. 2002;114(14):2708–2711. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::AID-ANIE2596>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tornøe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M. Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2002;67(9):3057–3064. doi: 10.1021/jo011148j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gil MV, Arévalo MJ, López Ó. Click chemistry—what’s in a name? Triazole synthesis and beyond. Synthesis. 2007;(11):1589–1620. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hänni KD, Leigh DA. The application of CuAAC “click” chemistry to catenane and rotaxane synthesis. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1240–1251. doi: 10.1039/b901974j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hua Y, Flood AH. Click chemistry generates privileged CH hydrogen-bonding triazoles: the latest addition to anion supramolecular chemistry. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1262–1271. doi: 10.1039/b818033b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kappe CO, Van Der Eycken E. Click chemistry under non-classical reaction conditions. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1280–1290. doi: 10.1039/b901973c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hein JE, Fokin VV. Copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) and beyond: new reactivity of copper(i) acetylides. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1302–1315. doi: 10.1039/b904091a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mamidyala SK, Finn MG. In situ click chemistry: probing the binding landscapes of biological molecules. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1252–1261. doi: 10.1039/b901969n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Decréau RA, Collman JP, Hosseini A. Electrochemical applications. How click chemistry brought biomimetic models to the next level: electrocatalysis under controlled rate of electron transfer. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1291–1301. doi: 10.1039/b901972n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.El-Sagheer AH, Brown T. Click chemistry with DNA. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1388–1405. doi: 10.1039/b901971p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Binder WH, Sachsenhofer R. “Click” chemistry in polymer and materials science. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2007;28(1):15–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Golas PL, Matyjaszewski K. Marrying click chemistry with polymerization: expanding the scope of polymeric materials. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39(4):1338–1354. doi: 10.1039/b901978m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Michael A. Über die Einwirkung von Diazobenzolimid auf Acetylendicarbonsäure-methylester. Journal für Praktische Chemie. 1893;48(1):94–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Maschauer S, Prante O. Sweetening pharmaceutical radiochemistry by 18F-fluoro-glycosylation: a short review. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:30 pages. doi: 10.1155/2014/214748.214748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Liu Z, Li Y, Lozada J, et al. Stoichiometric leverage: rapid 18F-aryltrifluoroborate radiosynthesis at high specific activity for click conjugation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition English. 2013;56(8):2303–2307. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Brewer GJ. Copper toxicity in the general population. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2010;121(4):459–460. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mäding P, Füchtner F, Wüst F. Module-assisted synthesis of the bifunctional labelling agent N-succinimidyl 4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]SFB) Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2005;63(3):329–332. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Herth MM, Andersen VL, Lehel S, Madsen J, Knudsen GM, Kristensen JL. Development of a 11C-labeled tetrazine for rapid tetrazine-trans-cyclooctene ligation. Chemical Communications. 2013;49(36):3805–3807. doi: 10.1039/c3cc41027g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Haka MS, Kilbourn MR, Watkins GL, Toorongian SA. Aryltrimethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonates as precursors to aryl [18F]fluorides: improved synthesis of [18F]GBR-13119. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 1989;27(7):823–833. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES